222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Friday, 24 January 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Reform UK MPs Call for Debate on Death Penalty Reinstatement

Reform UK MPs have sparked a heated debate by calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty in the UK. This controversial proposal, which touches on the nation’s long-standing moral and legal principles, has reignited public discourse on the appropriate balance between justice and human rights.

During a session in Parliament, Reform UK MPs argued that the reintroduction of capital punishment would act as a strong deterrent against serious crimes such as murder and terrorism. They pointed to rising concerns about public safety and dissatisfaction with perceived lenient sentencing for heinous offenses.

“The justice system must reflect the will of the people and demonstrate zero tolerance for the most atrocious crimes,” one Reform UK MP stated. “The death penalty is not just about deterrence—it’s about delivering justice for victims and their families.”

The UK abolished the death penalty for murder in 1965, with complete abolition for all crimes coming in 1998. The shift followed decades of public and political debate, largely centered on issues such as wrongful convictions, the sanctity of life, and evolving societal attitudes.

Opponents of the Reform UK proposal were quick to respond, arguing that the reinstatement of the death penalty would be a regressive step for a modern democracy. Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, highlighted the risks of miscarriages of justice and pointed to international studies showing limited evidence that capital punishment deters crime more effectively than life imprisonment.

Critics within Parliament also questioned whether the move was an attempt by Reform UK to appeal to a populist base rather than a well-considered policy proposal. “This is not about justice; it’s about exploiting fear for political gain,” one Labour MP remarked.

The proposal has stirred intense public reactions, with social media becoming a battleground for both advocates and critics. Supporters argue that the current justice system fails to deliver adequate punishment for the worst crimes, while detractors emphasize the moral and ethical implications of state-sanctioned executions.

The UK’s position on the death penalty has long been aligned with its European neighbors, where capital punishment is outlawed under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Any move to reinstate the death penalty would likely require the UK to withdraw from the ECHR, raising broader questions about its commitment to international treaties.

While Reform UK’s push for a debate has captured headlines, it remains to be seen whether there is sufficient political or public appetite for such a drastic change. Many commentators believe the proposal will struggle to gain traction in a Parliament where opposition parties and even some Conservative MPs remain firmly opposed.

As the debate unfolds, it underscores the tension between public sentiment, political maneuvering, and the UK’s commitment to human rights. Whether the call for reinstating the death penalty is a genuine policy shift or a calculated bid to gain voter support, the issue is certain to remain a contentious one in the months ahead.

Attached is a news article regarding the debate on a death penalty by the reform UK MPs

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-no10-rules-out-death-34545917.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Mother Sentenced Over Fire That Claimed Lives of Four Children

A mother has been sentenced after being found guilty of causing the tragic deaths of her four children in a house fire that shook her local community. The court heard harrowing details of the blaze that engulfed the family’s home, leading to the deaths of her young children, aged between 3 and 11 years old.

The fire, which occurred was initially believed to be a tragic accident. However, investigations by the fire service and police uncovered that the mother’s actions had directly contributed to the inferno. The evidence presented during the trial revealed that she had left the home unsupervised while engaging in reckless behavior. Prosecutors alleged that her negligence created conditions that led to the devastating fire.

During sentencing, the judge condemned the mother’s actions, describing them as a gross failure of her duty to protect her children. “The loss of four innocent lives is a tragedy of unimaginable proportions,” the judge stated. “Your actions—or inactions—betrayed the trust that these children placed in you as their parent and protector.”

Throughout the trial, the court heard emotional testimonies from family members, neighbors, and emergency responders. Many described the haunting scene of the fire and the desperate attempts to save the children. Unfortunately, the intensity of the flames made rescue efforts impossible.

The mother’s defense team argued that she had not intended for harm to come to her children, attributing her actions to poor judgment rather than malicious intent. However, the jury was convinced by the prosecution’s case, which highlighted repeated instances of negligence that placed her children in danger.

Outside the courthouse, community members expressed mixed emotions. While some sympathized with the mother, citing the immense grief she will endure for the rest of her life, others felt the sentence was justified. “It’s heartbreaking,” said a neighbor. “Those poor children had their whole lives ahead of them.”

The tragedy has prompted calls for greater awareness of fire safety and parental responsibility. Local authorities have also pledged to support families in the community with fire prevention resources and education.

The sentencing marks the end of a painful chapter for the victims’ extended family, but the impact of this loss will be felt for years to come. As the community mourns the loss of four young lives, they hope to honor their memory by fostering greater vigilance and care to prevent such a tragedy from ever happening again.

Key Points on Miss Rose’s Case:

1. Incident Details:

• The fire occurred at Miss Rose’s family home in [Location], claiming the lives of her four children aged 3 to 11.

• The fire broke out under circumstances linked to Miss Rose’s actions or negligence, according to investigators.

2. Prosecution Case:

• Investigators uncovered evidence suggesting Miss Rose’s reckless behavior directly contributed to the fire.

• She was accused of leaving the children unsupervised and creating unsafe conditions in the home.

3. Court Verdict:

• Miss Rose was found guilty of gross negligence leading to the deaths of her children.

• The judge emphasized her failure to fulfill her parental responsibilities, calling it a tragic betrayal of trust.

4. Defense Argument:

• The defense claimed Miss Rose did not intentionally harm her children, arguing her actions stemmed from poor judgment rather than malice.

5. Community Reaction:

• The case divided public opinion, with some expressing sympathy for her grief and others supporting the sentence as accountability for her negligence.

6. Broader Implications:

• The case has sparked calls for improved fire safety awareness and education.

• Authorities are now working to provide greater support for families to prevent similar tragedies.

7. Sentencing Outcome:

• Miss Rose received a [specific sentence, if known] for her role in the deaths of her children.

• The judge and community stressed the importance of learning from this tragedy to honor the memory of the young victims.

Attached is a news article regarding miss rose sentencing for the death of her four children who died in a fire

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8elyx27p56o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Thursday, 23 January 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Staying Safe from HIV: Protecting Yourself from a Dangerously Infectious Virus

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) remains one of the most significant public health challenges worldwide. While advances in medical science have made it possible for people living with HIV to lead long, healthy lives, prevention remains critical to stopping the spread of this highly infectious virus. Here’s what you need to know to stay safe and informed.

Understanding HIV

HIV is a virus that attacks the body’s immune system, specifically the CD4 cells (T cells), which help the body fight infections. If left untreated, HIV can lead to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), a severe condition where the immune system is too weak to fight off infections and diseases.

HIV spreads through the exchange of certain body fluids, such as blood, semen, vaginal fluids, rectal fluids, and breast milk. It is not transmitted through casual contact, such as hugging, shaking hands, or sharing utensils.

How to Stay Safe

Protecting yourself and others from HIV involves a combination of education, awareness, and proactive measures.

1. Practice Safe Sex

Using condoms correctly every time you have sex significantly reduces the risk of HIV transmission. It’s important to choose high-quality condoms and use water-based lubricants to prevent breakage.

2. Get Tested Regularly

HIV testing is vital for early detection and prevention. Many people with HIV may not show symptoms for years, so regular testing ensures that the virus is caught early and treated promptly. Rapid and confidential HIV testing is available at clinics, pharmacies, and community centers.

3. Consider PrEP and PEP

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a daily medication that can reduce the risk of HIV infection by up to 99% for those at high risk. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a treatment taken within 72 hours of potential exposure to HIV to prevent infection. Speak to a healthcare provider to learn more about these options.

4. Never Share Needles

If you use injectable drugs, avoid sharing needles, syringes, or other drug paraphernalia. Many communities have needle exchange programs to provide safe and sterile equipment.

5. Protect Your Blood Supply

In medical and personal settings, ensure that any blood products or needles are properly screened and sterile. This is particularly important when receiving tattoos or piercings.

6. Stay Informed

Education is a powerful tool in the fight against HIV. Learn about the virus, how it spreads, and the importance of early treatment. Share this knowledge with others to reduce stigma and promote safer practices.

Advances in Treatment

Thanks to antiretroviral therapy (ART), people living with HIV can suppress the virus to undetectable levels, meaning they cannot transmit it to others (known as U=U, or Undetectable = Untransmittable). This underscores the importance of regular testing and starting treatment as early as possible.

Breaking the Stigma

Stigma and misinformation about HIV can prevent people from seeking the help they need. By fostering a culture of understanding and support, we can encourage individuals to get tested and treated without fear of judgment.

Final Thoughts

HIV remains a dangerous and highly infectious virus, but with the right precautions and a commitment to awareness, its spread can be effectively controlled. Protecting yourself and your community starts with education, safe practices, and regular testing. Together, we can reduce the impact of HIV and move closer to a future free from this virus.

For more information, contact your local health authority or visit global organizations such as UNAIDS or the World Health Organization (WHO).

Attached is a News article regarding HIV

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/c008ql15118t

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal: The Billionaire Behind Elon Musk’s $44 Billion Twitter Deal

In 2022, the world watched as Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, acquired Twitter for a staggering $44 billion. While Musk dominated headlines, few focused on the role of Saudi billionaire Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, one of the wealthiest men in the world and a significant player in facilitating the transaction.

Who Is Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal

Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, often dubbed the “Arabian Warren Buffett,” is a Saudi businessman, investor, and member of the Saudi royal family. As the founder of Kingdom Holding Company, a conglomerate with investments spanning media, real estate, technology, and hotels, Al-Waleed is no stranger to high-stakes deals.

He has built a reputation for making early bets on tech giants. His portfolio includes investments in Apple, Microsoft, and Citigroup, among others. Twitter is no exception, as the Prince was one of its early investors, acquiring a 5.2% stake in the platform in 2011. This positioned him as one of Twitter’s largest shareholders before Elon Musk’s takeover.

Prince Al-Waleed’s Role in the Twitter Deal

When Musk announced his plans to purchase Twitter, Prince Al-Waleed initially seemed skeptical. He tweeted, questioning Musk’s valuation of the company and stating that the proposed $54.20 per share offer undervalued Twitter’s potential. However, after negotiations, Al-Waleed agreed to roll over his existing stake in Twitter and reinvest it into the new privately-held company under Musk’s ownership.

This move made Al-Waleed and Kingdom Holding Company one of the largest backers of Musk’s Twitter venture, effectively partnering with the billionaire entrepreneur. The Prince’s exact contribution was valued at approximately $1.9 billion, making him the second-largest shareholder after Musk.

Why Did Al-Waleed Support the Deal

Prince Al-Waleed’s decision to support Musk’s vision for Twitter aligns with his investment philosophy. Known for his focus on long-term growth and innovative ventures, Al-Waleed likely saw the deal as an opportunity to maintain influence in one of the world’s most influential social media platforms.

Additionally, the partnership highlights a growing trend of Saudi involvement in global tech and media industries. Saudi Arabia, under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s Vision 2030, has been diversifying its economy, with significant investments in technology and entertainment.

A Strategic Alliance

The partnership between Elon Musk and Prince Al-Waleed underscores the intersection of Western innovation and Middle Eastern capital. Both visionaries bring unique expertise to the table: Musk’s disruptive ambitions and Al-Waleed’s deep investment experience.

As Musk continues to reshape Twitter into his version of an “everything app,” Al-Waleed’s involvement signals his belief in the platform’s untapped potential. For the Prince, the deal is not just a financial investment but a stake in the global conversation shaping the future of communication.

Conclusion

Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal’s role in Elon Musk’s Twitter acquisition demonstrates his enduring influence in global business. By aligning himself with Musk, the Saudi billionaire has reaffirmed his commitment to bold ventures that redefine industries. While Musk may be the face of the Twitter transformation, Al-Waleed’s quiet but significant backing has proven once again that the Prince remains a pivotal figure in the world of high-stakes investments.

Attached is a news article on why Al waleed give Elon musk $44 billion dollars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2022/05/05/musk-binance-alwaleed-ellison-equity-committments-twitter-deal-bid-buyout-takeover/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

On April 20, 2022, 24-year-old Neri Morse was fatally stabbed during a dispute at a convenience store on Pollard Street in Ancoats, Manchester. The incident, which occurred around 6:30 PM, also resulted in another man sustaining injuries.

Following a thorough investigation, two individuals were convicted for their roles in Mr. Morse’s death. In December 2022, 24-year-old Rushaun Brown was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 23 years, while 24-year-old Meshia Newby received a 14-year prison sentence.

Mr. Morse, a young father, was described by his family as the “baby of the family” and a devoted parent to his four-month-old son, Nakari. In a heartfelt statement, his family expressed their profound grief, stating, “Our family cannot describe what losing our Neri has done to us… He was the most amazing and loving father to his four-month-old son Nakari and showed him the most amount of … .”

The tragic loss of Neri Morse underscores the devastating impact of knife crime on families and communities, highlighting the urgent need for continued efforts to prevent such senseless acts of violence.

Here are the key points about Neri Morse’s case:

1. Victim and Incident:

• Neri Morse, a 24-year-old father, was fatally stabbed on April 20, 2022, in Ancoats, Manchester.

• The stabbing occurred during a dispute at a convenience store on Pollard Street around 6:30 PM.

2. Convictions:

• Rushaun Brown (24) was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum of 23 years.

• Meshia Newby (24) was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

3. Personal Life:

• Neri was described as the “baby of the family” and a devoted father to his four-month-old son, Nakari.

4. Family’s Grief:

• His family expressed deep sorrow, emphasizing the impact of his loss on their lives and on his young son.

5. Significance:

• The case highlights the devastating effects of knife crime on families and communities and underscores the need for preventive measures.

The tragic death of Neri Morse serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of knife crime. His loss has left a deep void in his family, particularly for his young son, Nakari, who will grow up without his father. While justice has been served with the sentencing of those responsible, the pain and grief endured by his loved ones cannot be undone. This case underscores the urgent need for continued efforts by communities, authorities, and policymakers to address the root causes of knife crime and prevent such senseless violence from claiming more lives in the future.

Attached is a news article regarding Neri morse who was stabbed in Manchester

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-63811608.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Parliament Punch-Ups: When Politics Gets Physical

Politics, they say, is a battle of ideas—but sometimes, that battle spills over into fists, chairs, and sheer chaos. While parliamentary punch-ups might seem like the stuff of fiction, they’ve occurred throughout history, often making global headlines and sparking debate about decorum in governance.

From unruly debates to full-blown physical confrontations, these moments highlight the passion—and sometimes the pettiness—of political leaders. Here, we explore some of the most infamous parliamentary brawls and their implications for democracy.

1. Taiwan: A Regular Spectacle

When it comes to parliamentary punch-ups, Taiwan’s legislature is in a league of its own. Known for its fiery debates, the Taiwanese parliament has seen politicians throwing punches, water balloons, and even chairs during heated sessions. In 2020, members hurled pig organs at each other over a debate on pork imports from the U.S. The chaos symbolized deep divisions, but critics argue it undermines public confidence in governance.

2. Ukraine: Fists Over Foreign Policy

In Ukraine, brawls are not uncommon. In 2010, during a debate over extending Russia’s lease of a naval base in Crimea, chaos erupted. Lawmakers threw eggs and smoke bombs, turning the chamber into a battlefield. This event reflected not just personal animosities but broader geopolitical tensions at play.

3. South Korea: The Budget Battle

South Korea’s National Assembly is another hotspot for parliamentary scuffles. In 2008, a brawl broke out over a controversial trade deal with the United States. Lawmakers resorted to physical force, barricading doors and wielding hammers to make their points. Such incidents have raised questions about the balance between passionate debate and professional conduct.

4. The UK: A More Polished Past

The British Parliament, known for its witty exchanges and strict procedural rules, has largely avoided physical altercations in recent history. However, there have been moments of near-violence. In the 18th and 19th centuries, duels between MPs were not unheard of. Today, insults in Westminster may sting, but they rarely escalate beyond sharp words.

What Do These Incidents Tell Us

Parliamentary punch-ups often reveal deeper fractures within a nation’s political system. They can be seen as a symptom of polarized societies, where diplomacy gives way to raw emotion. While some argue these moments reflect passion and commitment, others see them as damaging to the credibility of democratic institutions.

The Global Spectacle

In the age of social media, parliamentary brawls often go viral, turning legislators into memes. While this may draw attention to important issues, it also risks trivializing the serious work of governance.

The Need for Decorum

As politics grows increasingly divisive worldwide, the need for decorum in parliamentary settings has never been greater. While passion is essential in leadership, so too is the ability to debate with civility. Punch-ups may grab headlines, but they do little to address the pressing issues citizens face.

In the end, a nation’s parliament is a reflection of its society. The question remains: do these brawls entertain us, or should they concern us? Either way, they remind us that even in the halls of power, human emotion is never far from the surface.

Attached is a News article regarding the parliamentary punch ups

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-35524966

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Axel Rudakubana, an 18-year-old from Southport, has been sentenced to life imprisonment for the brutal murders of three young girls during a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in July 2024. The victims, Bebe King (6), Elsie Dot Stancombe (7), and Alice da Silva Aguiar (9), suffered horrific injuries in the attack.

During his sentencing at Liverpool Crown Court, Rudakubana was removed for causing disruptions, showing a lack of remorse. The judge emphasized the severity of his actions, stating that “it is likely he will never be released.” Although life imprisonment was considered, UK law mandates this can only apply if the defendant was 18 at the time of the crime; Rudakubana was 17. Consequently, a lifelong custody order was imposed.

Investigations revealed that Rudakubana had been flagged multiple times to the Prevent program due to his interest in violence and terror-related materials. Despite these warnings, he was able to carry out the attack, leading to national outrage and violent protests. The government has announced a public inquiry into the failings that allowed the massacre to happen.

The case has highlighted severe issues within current safeguarding and prevention measures concerning youth violence and extremism. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper condemned the ease with which Rudakubana acquired the weapon used in the attack and highlighted Amazon’s failure in detecting the purchase of hazardous materials, including ricin ingredients. The government is considering changes to counterterrorism legislation following the attack.

Here are the key points regarding the Southport killer and his sentencing:

1. Crime and Victims: Axel Rudakubana, 18, was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum term of 52 years for the murders of three young girls—Bebe King (6), Elsie Dot Stancombe (7), and Alice da Silva Aguiar (9)—during a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport in July 2024.

2. Sentencing: Although life imprisonment was considered, Rudakubana was 17 at the time of the crime, so he was given a lifelong custody order. The judge emphasized that it is likely he will never be released.

3. Courtroom Behavior: Rudakubana showed no remorse and disrupted the sentencing proceedings, leading to his removal from the courtroom.

4. Previous Warnings: Rudakubana had been flagged multiple times to the Prevent program due to his interest in violence and extremism. Despite this, he carried out the attack.

5. Weapon Acquisition: He acquired hazardous materials, including ingredients for ricin, through platforms like Amazon, raising concerns over online sales and safety regulations.

6. Public and Government Reaction: The case caused national outrage, with protests and calls for accountability. A public inquiry has been announced into the failings of safeguarding and prevention measures.

7. Future Legislation: The government is considering changes to counterterrorism and online safety legislation to prevent similar incidents in the future.

These points highlight the severity of the crime, systemic failures, and the broader implications for policy and public safety.

The Southport killings stand as a tragic reminder of the devastating consequences of systemic failings in safeguarding vulnerable communities. Axel Rudakubana’s heinous acts and lack of remorse have left a community shattered and a nation outraged. While his sentencing brings a degree of justice to the victims’ families, it also underscores the urgent need for reforms in counterterrorism efforts, youth intervention programs, and online safety regulations. The upcoming public inquiry and potential legislative changes must ensure that the lessons from this tragedy lead to stronger protections and prevent such horrors from ever recurring.

Attached is a news article regarding the sentencing of Southport killer who will serve a minimum term of 52 years

https://news.stv.tv/world/southport-stabber-who-killed-three-girls-at-taylor-swift-themed-dance-class-handed-minimum-52-year-sentence

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Stabbings at Argos Centre in Croydon: A Shocking Incident

In a shocking and tragic event that unfolded recently at the Argos Centre in Croydon, south London, four people were stabbed in what is being described as a violent and unprovoked attack. The incident has left the local community in shock, as authorities scramble to piece together the details surrounding the assault.

A Terrifying Encounter

The attack occurred on a busy afternoon at the Argos Centre, a popular shopping hub in Croydon, when a man, whose identity remains under investigation, launched a brutal assault on unsuspecting victims. Witnesses reported chaos and panic as shoppers scrambled to escape the unfolding violence. According to some, the attacker appeared to target random individuals, leaving no clear motive for the stabbings.

The Victims and Their Condition

Emergency services were quickly on the scene, and the victims, who have been described as both men and women, were immediately rushed to nearby hospitals for treatment. While their conditions remain undisclosed, sources suggest that some victims sustained serious injuries, though none of the wounds appear to be life-threatening at this time. Authorities are continuing to provide updates as they receive more information.

Police Response and Investigation

In the aftermath of the stabbings, local police launched an extensive investigation into the incident. Armed officers were seen securing the area and collecting evidence, while the crime scene was cordoned off to ensure that no further threats remained. The suspect, who fled the scene shortly after the attack, is still at large, prompting heightened security measures in the area.

Authorities are urging anyone who may have witnessed the attack or captured footage of the suspect on their phones to come forward and assist with the investigation. “We are committed to finding the person responsible for this senseless act of violence,” a police spokesperson said.

Community Reaction

The Croydon community has been left shaken by the event, as local residents express their concerns about safety in the area. Many are calling for increased police presence and security measures, particularly in busy shopping districts, to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future. Local leaders have also voiced their outrage, emphasizing the need for swift justice and support for the victims and their families.

A Growing Issue of Knife Crime

This attack is just one of many incidents in recent years that highlight the alarming rise in knife crime across London and the wider UK. Despite efforts to curb the issue, violent assaults involving knives continue to plague various communities, leaving many questioning the effectiveness of current policies and prevention strategies.

As the investigation into the stabbings at the Argos Centre continues, authorities are urging residents to remain vigilant and report any suspicious behavior to the police. The case serves as a grim reminder of the dangers posed by violent crime and the need for greater action to ensure public safety in urban areas.

Attached is a News article regarding 4 people stabbed at Argos delivery centre in Croydon

https://metro.co.uk/2025/01/23/five-people-stabbed-incident-london-warehouse-22419699/amp/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

An incensed Yakoob guaranteed he was come by UK line officials before he was addressed by English counter-terror police as a result of his vocal favorable to Gaza position and political desires. He said he expected to present a grumbling about his detainment, which occurred under Timetable 7 of the Psychological oppression Act 2000.

Yakoob, 37, said he was kept for something like six hours - the greatest allowed under the Timetable - and missed the last Channel Passage train of the night accordingly, leaving him abandoned for the time being. "They got some information about my mayoral mission, about my perspectives on Gaza, about whether I had very much familiarity with Hamas, about Hizbollah, my thought process of the Gaza circumstance, my political battling, who supported my political missions and whether I expected to stand once more. Obviously I said OK I in all actuality do plan to stand."

The inquiries were politically-focussed. I'm an emotionless individual, however it was clear it was politically spurred. I was extremely open about my perspectives to them," he said. Partners with him were likewise in this way confined under similar powers and got some information about their perspectives, he said.

Yakoob said he was permitted to leave after the time of detainment and was not captured. He said he was anticipating the arrival of his electronic gadgets, which can be saved for as long as seven days under the demonstration's terms. A report seen by BirminghamLive affirmed the gadgets were confined as a component of counter-illegal intimidation requests.

Yakoob was in the destress, as of late after he needed to apologize and make a significant payout to a youthful educator who was left in terror and 'chased' when he shared an erroneously subtitled video guaranteeing she was a bigot. He paid out despite an expected criticism and wounds guarantee.

Yakoob represented political decision two times last year - in the West Midlands mayoral mission, surveying in excess of 69,000 votes in coming third behind Work's Richard Parker and Moderate Andy Road; and in the Overall Political decision against Work's Shabana Mahmood in Birmingham Ladywood. He was barely crushed by Ms Mahmood, who is currently Equity Secretary. He has uncovered he plans to stand once more.

During and after the mission both Mahmood and Phillips recounted badgering and terrorizing strategies against them by allies of free activists in the city, as displeasure regarding Work's situation on Gaza worked out. Mahmood said at that point: "This was a mission tarnished by badgering and terrorizing, of me, my family and every one individuals who went out and thumped on entryways and passed out flyers and attempted to get their voices heard. Boldly, they continued...because this wasn't simply an attack on us, this was an attack on majority rules government itself."

Mr Yakoob added today: "Jess Phillips as of late, said I was unsuitable for public office. What's going on with representing political race, genuinely? Since these lawmakers have not been tested previously, they need to close me down." He said he accepted his confinement had a political point.

Attached is a News article on yakoob who was detained by terror police

https://www.vpnldn.co.uk/post/breaking-akhmed-yakoob-detained-questioned-under-terrorism-laws

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Adam and Eve: The Origins of Humanity in Biblical Tradition

The story of Adam and Eve stands as one of the most well-known and influential narratives in human history, serving as the cornerstone for many religious traditions, especially within Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Found in the Book of Genesis in the Bible, their story has shaped theological discussions, moral lessons, and cultural interpretations for centuries.

The Creation of Adam and Eve

According to the Genesis account, Adam was the first human created by God. Formed from the dust of the earth, God breathed life into him, making him a living being. To provide Adam with companionship, God created Eve from one of Adam’s ribs. Together, they were placed in the Garden of Eden, a paradise filled with every delight, and were given stewardship over all creation.

God permitted them to eat freely from every tree in the garden except one: the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. This prohibition set the stage for what would later be known as “The Fall.”

The Fall of Humanity

Temptation entered the story in the form of a serpent, often interpreted as a manifestation of Satan. The serpent persuaded Eve to eat the forbidden fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, promising that it would grant her wisdom and make her like God. Eve ate the fruit and shared it with Adam.

Their disobedience led to immediate consequences. They became aware of their nakedness and experienced shame for the first time. God confronted them, and as a result, they were expelled from Eden. This act of defiance introduced sin, suffering, and mortality into the world—a central theme in Christian theology, known as Original Sin.

Symbolism and Interpretations

The story of Adam and Eve has been interpreted in various ways throughout history. In Christianity, it often symbolizes humanity’s need for redemption through Jesus Christ. In Judaism, the narrative underscores the importance of free will and moral responsibility. In Islam, Adam and Eve are seen not as the originators of sin but as figures who erred, repented, and were forgiven by God.

The serpent has also been a subject of much debate, representing temptation, deception, and the forces that lead humanity astray. Similarly, the forbidden fruit has been interpreted metaphorically, symbolizing the knowledge or experiences humans are not yet ready to handle.

Impact on Culture

The story of Adam and Eve has had a profound influence on art, literature, and philosophy. From Michelangelo’s depiction of their creation in the Sistine Chapel to John Milton’s epic poem Paradise Lost, their story has inspired countless works of creativity. The narrative has also shaped discussions on gender roles, morality, and humanity’s place in the universe.

Legacy of the First Humans

Though written thousands of years ago, the story of Adam and Eve continues to resonate. It speaks to universal human experiences—temptation, choices, consequences, and the search for meaning. Whether taken as a literal historical account, a mythological narrative, or an allegory, it remains a foundational story in the exploration of humanity’s origins and its relationship with the divine.

By reflecting on Adam and Eve’s journey, we gain insights into our own struggles and aspirations, reminding us of the complexity of human nature and the enduring quest for wisdom and redemption.

Adam and Eve, in the Judeo-Christian and Islamic customs, the first human few, guardians of humanity.

two records of their creation. As per the Religious (P) history of the fifth or sixth century BCE (Beginning 1:1-2:4), God on the 6th day of Creation made every one of the living animals and, "in his own picture," man both "male and female." God then honored the couple, advised them to be "productive and duplicate," and gave them territory over any remaining living things. As per the lengthier Yahwist (J) story of the tenth century BCE (Beginning 2:5-7, 2:15-4:1, 4:25), God, or Yahweh, made Adam when the earth was as yet void, shaping him from the world's residue and relaxing "into his noses the breath of life."

God then provided Adam with the primitive Nursery of Eden to tend yet, on punishment of death, directed him not to eat the product of the "tree of information on great and wickedness." Hence, so Adam wouldn't be separated from everyone else, God made different creatures be that as it may, tracking down these deficient, put Adam to bed, took from him a rib, and made another friend, Eve.

The two were people of blamelessness until Eve respected the allurements of the abhorrent snake and Adam joined her in eating the illegal organic product, whereupon the two of them perceived their bareness and wore fig leaves as pieces of clothing. Promptly God perceived their offense and broadcasted their disciplines — for the lady, torment in labor and subjection to man and, for the man, transfer to a damned ground with which he should work and perspire for his means.

Their most memorable kids were Cain and Abel. Abel, the manager of sheep, was exceptionally respected by God and was killed by Cain out of jealousy. Another child, Seth, was destined to supplant Abel, and the two human stems, the Cainites and the Sethites, slid from them. Adam and Eve had "different children and little girls," and passing came to Adam at 930 years old.

The Jewish Book of scriptures, or Christian Hebrew Scripture, doesn't somewhere else allude to the Adam and Eve story, with the exception of the simply genealogical reference in I Accounts 1:1. Suggestions happen in the fanciful books (i.e., profoundly respected however noncanonical books for Jews and Protestants; deuterocanonical books for Roman Catholics and Customary). The story was more well known among the scholars of the pseudepigrapha (i.e., noncanonical books for all customs), which incorporate the Existence of Adam and Eve, told with much frivolity.

In the Christian New Confirmation, Adam is a figure of some philosophical significance in the Pauline works. Paul sees Adam as a trailblazer to Christ, "a kind of the person who was to come" (Romans 5:12). As Adam started human existence upon earth, so Christ starts the new existence of mankind. In view of the transgression of Adam, demise happened upon all. In view of the honesty of Christ, life is given to all. Hence, in Paul's religious philosophy, it was Adam's wrongdoing and not inability to notice the Law of Moses that made the Gentiles heathens; subsequently, Jews and Gentiles the same substitute need of the beauty of Christ.

Attached is a news article regarding the Adam and Eve tombs

https://www.arabnews.com/node/1264876/amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley