Smileband News

 

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Teacher Faces Scrutiny After Classroom Incident and Subsequent Employment

A teacher has come under scrutiny following allegations that she instructed two students to kiss during a classroom activity, raising concerns among parents and education officials about appropriate conduct in schools.

According to reports, the incident prompted an investigation by school authorities into whether professional boundaries had been crossed. Educational experts note that teachers are expected to maintain a safe and appropriate learning environment, with activities involving physical contact between students generally requiring careful consideration and supervision.

The controversy intensified after it emerged that the teacher later secured a position at an elementary school. Some parents questioned whether sufficient background checks and reviews had been conducted before the appointment was made.

School officials have stated that employment decisions are typically made following established safeguarding procedures, including reviews of an applicant’s professional history and any relevant findings from previous investigations.

Child welfare advocates argue that schools must place student safety and well-being at the centre of all hiring decisions. They emphasize that allegations involving inappropriate classroom conduct should be thoroughly examined to ensure confidence in the education system.

The teacher has not publicly commented on the matter, and it remains important to distinguish between allegations and proven misconduct. Any disciplinary or legal findings would ultimately depend on the results of official investigations and the evidence available.

The case has sparked wider debate about safeguarding standards, professional conduct in schools, and the processes used to assess educators before they are entrusted with the care and education of young children.

Attached is a news article regarding a lesbian teacher face scrutiny over making two students kiss each other 

https://hanfordsentinel.com/_services/v1/client_captcha/challenge?request=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJleHAiOjE3ODE5NzQyMzUsImlhdCI6MTc4MTk3MzkzNSwicmVkaXJlY3QiOiIvbmV3cy9uYXRpb25hbC9kZW52ZXItcHVibGljLXNjaG9vbHMtZmlyZXMtdGVhY2hlci1hY2N1c2VkLW9mLW1ha2luZy1mZW1hbGUtc3R1ZGVudHMta2lzcy1kdXJpbmctY2xhc3Mtc2tpdHMvYXJ0aWNsZV81ZDQ0ZTc2Yi0yNWJiLTVkNmUtOThhYi1iNTA0OGY1MzliNjQuYW1wLmh0bWwiLCJzZXJ2aWNlIjoiX2xiX3JhdGVfY21zYXBwX2ZvcmVpZ24iLCJzaXRlIjoiaGFuZm9yZHNlbnRpbmVsLmNvbSJ9.NSikqOJDUh2H8ubx5hswWzl-YXlFx3TZsQsM2VKvpSY

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Sean Strickland Sparks Controversy After Incident at Boston Church Displaying LGBTQ+ Flags

UFC fighter Sean Strickland has once again found himself at the centre of controversy after a video circulated online showing him reacting to LGBTQ+ and transgender pride flags displayed outside a church in Boston.

The incident reportedly took place at a well-known Boston church that gained popularity through its appearance in the film The Boondock Saints. Social media posts and videos shared online appear to show Strickland expressing disapproval of the flags before spitting in the direction of the church building. 

The footage quickly generated strong reactions online. Supporters of LGBTQ+ rights criticised the action as disrespectful toward both the church and the communities represented by the flags. Others defended Strickland’s right to express his personal views, highlighting ongoing debates surrounding free speech, religion and cultural issues. 

Strickland has previously attracted attention for comments regarding LGBTQ+ issues, with several of his past remarks receiving criticism from activists, journalists and advocacy groups. Those comments have contributed to his reputation as one of the most outspoken and controversial figures in mixed martial arts. 

As of now, there have been no reports of criminal charges or police involvement connected to the Boston church incident. The event remains a topic of discussion across social media platforms, where supporters and critics continue to debate the boundaries of personal expression and public conduct. 

The controversy adds to a growing list of headline-making moments involving Strickland, whose outspoken personality has often generated as much attention outside the cage as his performances inside it.

Attached is a News article regarding Sean Strickland spitting at a church in Boston over LGBTQ flag 

https://www.facebook.com/LifeSiteNews/videos/sean-strickland-wasnt-impressed-at-the-lgbt-colors-on-the-famous-boondock-saints/1640172494780024/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

NATO Warns Europe to Prepare for Potential Russian Threat Within Five Years

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has warned that member nations must strengthen their defences amid concerns that Russia could be in a position to threaten NATO territory within the next five years.

Speaking at an event hosted by Chatham House in London, Rutte said that NATO allies should not underestimate the pace at which Russia is rebuilding its military capabilities. He argued that the alliance must increase defence spending, modernise armed forces and expand military production to maintain a strong deterrent against potential aggression. 

Rutte stated that Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years, warning that the alliance must be prepared for future security challenges. He stressed that the goal of increased military readiness is to prevent conflict rather than encourage it. 

NATO leaders have called for significant increases in defence investment, with discussions focusing on strengthening air and missile defences, replenishing ammunition stockpiles and improving the alliance’s ability to respond rapidly to emerging threats. 

The warning comes as the war in Ukraine continues to shape European security policy. NATO officials argue that Russia’s military activities and defence production demonstrate the need for long-term planning and preparedness across the alliance. 

At the same time, NATO leaders have emphasised that the alliance remains a defensive organisation. Officials have repeatedly stated that they do not expect an imminent attack on NATO territory, but believe preparations made now are necessary to maintain peace and deter future aggression.

Russia has rejected NATO’s warnings and denied that it intends to attack alliance members. The Kremlin has accused NATO of using such claims to justify higher military spending and a larger military presence in Europe.

The debate over defence spending and military preparedness is expected to remain a major issue for NATO governments as they assess the future security landscape in Europe and the continuing impact of the conflict in Ukraine.

Attached is a News article saying that NATO are saying that the uk must prepare for war with Russia within the next 5 years 

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/06/05/uk-prime-minister-keir-starmer-says-russia-could-attack-nato-within-four-years

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Three Men Jailed for Kidnapping and Abusing 14-Year-Old Girl

Three men have been sentenced to a total of 10 years in prison after being convicted of kidnapping and abusing a 14-year-old girl, following an investigation by police and prosecutors.

The court heard that the teenager was unlawfully taken and subjected to serious abuse during the incident. Authorities launched an investigation after receiving reports of the crime, gathering evidence that ultimately led to the convictions.

During sentencing, the judge described the offences as extremely serious and highlighted the lasting impact such crimes can have on young victims. The court was told that the girl’s welfare remains a priority and that support services have been made available to assist her recovery.

Police welcomed the outcome of the case, stating that the sentence reflects the gravity of the offences and sends a clear message that crimes against children will be pursued vigorously. Investigators also praised the courage of the victim in assisting the investigation.

Child protection organisations have repeatedly stressed the importance of reporting suspected abuse and exploitation, noting that early intervention can help safeguard vulnerable young people from harm.

The identities of victims under the age of 18 are generally protected by law and media organisations do not normally publish information that could lead to their identification.

Attached is a news article regarding three black men who kidnapped a 14 year old and raped and abused her 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgk025jy68no

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

What Did the First Human Look Like

The question of what the first human looked like has fascinated scientists, historians, and the public for generations. While there was no single “first human” born overnight, modern humans evolved gradually from earlier ancestors over hundreds of thousands of years.

Scientists believe that the earliest members of our species, Homo sapiens, appeared in Africa around 300,000 years ago. Fossil evidence suggests these early humans had many features similar to people today, including a high forehead, smaller teeth, and a rounded skull. However, they were generally more robust, with stronger bones and muscles due to the physically demanding lifestyles they lived.

Researchers believe the first humans likely had dark skin, which provided protection against the intense ultraviolet radiation of the African sun. Hair was probably dark and tightly curled, helping regulate body temperature in hot climates. Men and women were typically shorter than many people today, with males averaging around 5 feet 5 inches tall.

Unlike the common image of cavemen dressed in animal skins and carrying clubs, early Homo sapiens were intelligent hunters and gatherers. They crafted stone tools, controlled fire, and eventually developed language, art, and complex social structures.

The evolution of humanity was a gradual process. Earlier human relatives such as Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis shared some characteristics with modern humans but also retained more primitive features, including heavier brow ridges and larger jaws.

Modern technology has allowed scientists to reconstruct the faces of ancient humans from fossil remains. These reconstructions reveal individuals who would appear recognisably human if seen today, although with slightly different facial proportions and stronger physical features.

The search for our origins continues as archaeologists uncover new fossils and genetic evidence. Each discovery provides a clearer picture of how our ancestors lived, adapted, and eventually spread across the globe to become the diverse human population that exists today.

While the exact appearance of the very first humans can never be known with complete certainty, scientific evidence paints a picture of resilient, intelligent people whose legacy lives on in every human being alive today.

Attached is a news article regarding what the first human looked like 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx01ve5151o

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Son of Norway’s Crown Princess Jailed for Four Years

Marius Borg Høiby, the son of Norway’s Crown Princess Mette-Marit and stepson of Crown Prince Haakon, has been sentenced to four years in prison following one of the most closely watched criminal trials in modern Norwegian history. An Oslo court delivered the verdict on 15 June 2026 after a lengthy trial that attracted widespread media attention across Norway and internationally. 

The 29-year-old was found guilty of multiple offences, including two counts of rape, domestic abuse and other criminal acts. Prosecutors had originally sought a sentence of more than seven years, while the defence argued for a significantly shorter prison term. The court ultimately imposed a four-year sentence. 

Høiby denied the rape allegations throughout the proceedings but admitted responsibility for some lesser offences. The court convicted him on dozens of charges while acquitting him of several others. He has announced plans to appeal the verdict. 

Although Høiby has no royal title and does not carry out official duties on behalf of the Norwegian monarchy, his close connection to the royal family ensured intense public scrutiny of the case. The trial has prompted debate in Norway about domestic violence, sexual offences and accountability, regardless of social status or family connections. 

The court also ordered Høiby to pay compensation to several victims. Norwegian media described the case as one of the most significant scandals to affect the country’s royal family in recent decades. The royal household has largely refrained from commenting on the outcome, maintaining that the judicial process should proceed independently. 

The conviction marks a major moment for Norway’s justice system, with the case receiving national attention due to both the seriousness of the allegations and Høiby’s connection to the future king and queen of Norway. As the appeals process begins, the case is expected to remain a significant topic of discussion across the country. 

Attached is a news article regarding the son of Norway crown prince jailed for 4 years 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly9d10l5p4o

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by Smileband, 

Tommy Robinson Detained Under UK Counter-Terrorism Border Powers

British activist Tommy Robinson was detained at Heathrow Airport after returning to the United Kingdom from Russia via Turkey, according to reports and statements from both Robinson and the Metropolitan Police. The incident has sparked debate about the use of counter-terrorism powers and freedom of expression in the UK. 

Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, said he was held for approximately three hours under provisions of the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act. He stated that police seized his mobile phones and other communication devices before releasing him.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed that officers stopped a man in his 40s at Heathrow Airport following his return to Britain. Police said the individual was interviewed, had communication devices seized for examination, and was later released. Authorities have not publicly disclosed detailed reasons for the stop. 

The detention came after a week of intense online activity by Robinson relating to unrest in Belfast following a stabbing incident. Police and political leaders have expressed concern that inflammatory content shared online may have contributed to tensions surrounding subsequent disturbances. Authorities have stated that the original stabbing incident was not being treated as terrorism. 

Supporters of Robinson argue that the detention raises questions about free speech and the treatment of political activists. Critics, however, say the government’s border security powers are intended to investigate potential hostile activity and national security concerns rather than political opinions. 

Robinson has long been known for his criticism of Islam and his campaigning on issues including immigration, grooming gangs, and national identity. His views have made him one of the most controversial political activists in Britain, attracting both strong support and significant criticism. 

The case has renewed discussion about the balance between national security powers, civil liberties, and freedom of expression. As of now, no terrorism-related charges have been announced in connection with the Heathrow detention, and the investigation remains ongoing. 

Attached is a news article regarding Tommy Robinson detained under terrorist acts of law

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1kym193k7po

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

 

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Arson Attacks on Properties Linked to Keir Starmer Raise Security Concerns

A series of arson attacks on properties linked to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has prompted a major police investigation and raised concerns about the security of public figures in Britain.

The attacks, which occurred in north London during 2025, targeted a former home connected to Starmer, another property linked to his family, and a vehicle previously owned by him. While no fatalities were reported, the incidents caused significant property damage and alarm among residents. Investigators described the attacks as serious criminal acts that had the potential to endanger lives. 

In June 2026, two men were found guilty of conspiring to carry out the attacks. Prosecutors told the court that the suspects had been recruited through the messaging platform Telegram by an individual using the alias “El Money.” Evidence presented during the trial suggested that the organiser communicated in Russian and allegedly offered cryptocurrency payments in exchange for carrying out the arson attacks. 

Court proceedings heard that the convicted men claimed they were motivated by financial reward rather than political ideology. One of the defendants stated that he was unaware that the properties were connected to the Prime Minister. Prosecutors argued that the attacks nevertheless created a significant risk to public safety and were intended to spread fear.

The case has also attracted international attention due to reports that the alleged organiser may have links to individuals operating from Russia. However, British authorities have stated that no definitive evidence has been produced proving direct involvement by the Russian state. Investigators continue to examine the wider network behind the attacks. 

Security experts have warned that attacks on elected leaders, their families, and associated properties represent a threat not only to individuals but also to democratic institutions. The convictions mark a significant step in the investigation, but questions remain about who ultimately directed the operation and whether others were involved.

The defendants are expected to be sentenced following the conclusion of legal proceedings. Meanwhile, authorities have reaffirmed their commitment to protecting public officials and ensuring that those responsible for politically sensitive crimes are brought to justice.  

Attached is a news article regarding a arson attack on kier house

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8r2l352z2do

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

 

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Keir Starmer Announces Social Media Ban for Under-16s

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has announced a landmark plan to ban children under the age of 16 from accessing major social media platforms, describing the move as a necessary step to protect young people from the growing dangers of the online world.

The proposed legislation would prevent under-16s from using platforms including Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook, YouTube and X. The government says the measures are designed to tackle online harms such as cyberbullying, exposure to harmful content, addictive algorithms and the negative impact social media can have on young people’s mental health.

Speaking about the policy, Starmer said parents across the country have become increasingly concerned about the amount of time children spend online and the risks they face while using social media. He argued that the government has a responsibility to put children’s safety ahead of the interests of technology companies.

Under the plans, platforms will be required to carry out stronger age-verification checks to prevent children from creating accounts. Regulators are expected to use a combination of digital identification methods and age-assurance technology to enforce the rules. The government aims to introduce the legislation before Christmas, with the restrictions expected to come into force in 2027. 

The announcement has received strong support from many parents and child-safety campaigners. Government consultation figures suggest that around nine in ten parents backed tougher restrictions on children’s access to social media. Supporters argue that the ban could help reduce online bullying, improve mental wellbeing and encourage children to spend more time socialising, exercising and learning offline. 

However, the proposal has also sparked criticism from technology companies and some online safety experts. Firms including Meta, YouTube and Snapchat have warned that a blanket ban could push young people towards unregulated websites and platforms with fewer safety protections. Some campaigners have argued that technology companies should instead be forced to make their platforms safer rather than relying solely on age-based restrictions.

The policy follows similar action taken in Australia and is one of the most significant changes to online child protection laws in the UK in recent years. Alongside the social media ban, the government is also considering additional safeguards, including restrictions on livestreaming, contact from strangers, AI companion chatbots and other online features considered harmful to children.

If approved by Parliament, the reforms would mark a major shift in how young people access the internet and could set a precedent for other countries considering similar restrictions on social media use by children.

Attached is a news article regarding the ban for under 16 through social media 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqdny4l3jdo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

UFC Freedom 250 Makes History at the White House

WASHINGTON, D.C. — UFC Freedom 250 made sporting history as the first professional combat sports event ever held on the South Lawn of the White House. The event, staged as part of America’s 250th anniversary celebrations, transformed one of the world’s most recognisable political landmarks into a unique sporting arena. 

The event was organised by UFC CEO Dana White and was strongly backed by Donald Trump, who has maintained a long relationship with the UFC dating back more than two decades. The White House grounds were converted into a temporary fight venue featuring a full-size Octagon, large video screens, military displays and patriotic celebrations. 

Thousands of invited guests, military personnel and VIP attendees watched as some of the UFC’s biggest stars competed under the lights in front of the White House. The event attracted worldwide attention and was widely described as one of the most ambitious productions in mixed martial arts history.

In the headline bout, Justin Gaethje stunned many observers by defeating Ilia Topuria to capture the UFC lightweight championship. After surviving difficult early rounds, Gaethje rallied with powerful striking before Topuria’s corner stopped the contest before the final round.

The co-main event saw Ciryl Gane defeat Alex Pereira by knockout to secure the interim heavyweight title. The victory placed Gane back among the elite heavyweight contenders in the promotion. 

Despite concerns over weather conditions, including thunderstorms that briefly delayed proceedings, organisers successfully completed the event. The evening featured military escorts, patriotic ceremonies, a flyover and entertainment designed to celebrate the United States’ 250th anniversary.

UFC Freedom 250 will likely be remembered as one of the most unusual and talked-about events in combat sports history. By bringing mixed martial arts to the White House, the UFC created a spectacle that blended sport, politics and national celebration in a way never before seen in the United States.

Attached is a news article regarding the UFC 250 Freedom held at the White House 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/mixed-martial-arts/articles/cn8krr1ymxzo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156