222 News

Wednesday, 2 September 2026

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Arsenal Defender Gabriel Attacked by Bat-Wielding Robber in Attempted Car Theft

Arsenal defender Gabriel Magalhães was subjected to a terrifying attempted robbery after being targeted by men who tried to steal his car, phone and watch.

The incident happened in north London in August 2021, when Gabriel returned home following an evening out. According to reports, he was followed to his home by two men, one of whom was armed with a baseball bat.

CCTV footage later showed the attackers attempting to take Gabriel’s belongings and car keys. The situation quickly became violent when one of the men, identified as Abderaham Muse, confronted the Arsenal defender and his friend while carrying the bat.

Rather than surrendering his possessions, Gabriel fought back and managed to fend off the attackers. Neither Gabriel nor his friend suffered serious injuries during the confrontation, although the incident reportedly left them shocked.

The attempted robbery centred on Gabriel’s Mercedes, which was reported to be worth around £45,000, as well as his mobile phone and watch.

Police later identified Muse through DNA evidence reportedly recovered from a hat that he left behind. He was subsequently convicted and sentenced to five years in prison for the robbery and possession of an offensive weapon.

A frightening reminder for footballers

The attack highlighted the security risks faced by high-profile footballers away from the pitch. Players earning significant salaries and owning expensive vehicles can become attractive targets for criminals who monitor their movements and lifestyles.

For Gabriel, the incident was a frightening experience that happened outside his professional life. Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta later praised the defender’s character following the ordeal.

Gabriel has since continued to establish himself as an important part of Arsenal’s defence. The incident, however, remains a reminder that fame and wealth can sometimes bring unwanted attention — even when a footballer’s career is focused entirely on the pitch.

Attached is a news article regarding Arsenal footballer Gabriel attacked for his car

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-59493509

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 Mews viewers, sponsored by smileband,

King Charles Set to Receive Nearly £100 Million in Royal Funding — What Does It Mean for the UK Public?

King Charles III and the Royal Household are set to receive almost £100 million a year in core public funding from 2027–28, under a new arrangement that has sparked debate over the cost of the monarchy and whether taxpayers should be providing increased financial support.

The planned figure is £99.9 million, compared with the £51.8 million core Sovereign Grant in 2024–25. However, it is important to understand that this money is not a personal wage or salary for King Charles. The Sovereign Grant is public funding used to support the official work of the monarch and the Royal Household, including staff, official travel, property maintenance and other duties.

The increase follows a change in the formula used to determine the grant. The proportion of Crown Estate profits used in calculating royal funding is being increased from 12% to 20.5%, resulting in the core grant rising substantially.

Why is the figure changing?

The Royal Household’s funding has been affected by significant changes in Crown Estate revenues and the cost of maintaining royal properties.

In 2025–26, the total Sovereign Grant was £132.1 million, while the figure for 2026–27 is £137.9 million. The higher amounts include funding associated with the long-running Buckingham Palace reservicing programme.

The Government intends to reduce the grant once the Buckingham Palace work is completed, meaning the headline £137.9 million figure should not be confused with the longer-term core funding figure of £99.9 million.

What does this mean for ordinary people?

For many people across Britain, the issue is less about the precise amount paid to the Royal Household and more about what public money could otherwise be used for.

Britain continues to face pressure over household finances, housing costs, public services and the cost of living. Critics argue that increasing funding for the monarchy can appear difficult to justify when many families are struggling with everyday expenses.

However, the direct financial effect on an individual taxpayer is relatively small. The Royal Household previously calculated that an £86.3 million Sovereign Grant was equivalent to around £1.29 per person in the UK.

Therefore, an increase in the grant does not mean that people’s personal taxes suddenly rise by hundreds of pounds to fund the King.

Supporters defend the monarchy

Supporters argue that the Sovereign Grant provides the money necessary for the monarch to perform constitutional and ceremonial duties on behalf of the country.

The Royal Household also points to income generated through tourism and commercial activity connected with royal properties. Buckingham Palace, for example, attracts visitors who pay to tour parts of the building.

The argument from supporters is that the monarchy should be viewed not simply as an expense but as an institution that contributes to Britain’s tourism, international profile, diplomacy and heritage.

Critics question the priorities

Opponents, however, believe the Government should be looking more closely at royal expenditure.

They argue that a significant increase in public funding can be difficult to defend when public services are under financial pressure. The question they raise is straightforward: should taxpayers provide more money to maintain the monarchy while ordinary households are being asked to manage rising costs?

The debate is therefore about more than King Charles himself. It concerns how Britain chooses to spend public money and whether the constitutional role of the monarchy justifies its continuing level of taxpayer support.

A debate that is unlikely to disappear

The nearly £100 million figure is likely to continue generating controversy.

It is also important to distinguish between the King’s personal wealth, his private income and the Sovereign Grant. The grant is primarily funding for the Royal Household’s official responsibilities rather than a £100 million annual pay cheque for King Charles.

Ultimately, supporters see the funding as an investment in Britain’s constitutional system and national heritage, while critics see it as another example of public money being allocated to an institution that already possesses considerable wealth and assets.

For millions of people across the United Kingdom, the central question remains: at a time when the country is under financial pressure, is increasing public funding for the monarchy the right priority.

Attached is a news article on King Charles to receive 100 million pounds sovereign grant up from 31 million

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/king-charles-royal-family-funding-b3043238.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

32-Year-Old Man Dies After Serious Assault at Liverpool Street Station

A 32-year-old man has sadly died after being seriously assaulted at Liverpool Street Underground station while travelling home from Notting Hill Carnival.

The incident happened on Sunday, 30 August 2026, on the eastbound Central line platform at around 10.51pm. British Transport Police (BTP) officers and paramedics were called to the station following reports of a serious assault.

The victim was taken to hospital in a critical condition. Despite medical treatment, he sadly died on Tuesday, 1 September, surrounded by members of his family. Specialist officers are supporting his loved ones following his death.

Police said the man had been travelling home after attending Notting Hill Carnival’s Families and Children’s Day in west London.

A 38-year-old man, Jeremiah Maximo, from Drydock Square in Barking, had previously been charged with grievous bodily harm (GBH) in connection with the assault. He has been remanded in custody. Following the victim’s death, BTP detectives are seeking to have the charge amended through the court process.

Detective Superintendent Sam Blackburn of British Transport Police expressed his condolences to the victim’s family and appealed directly to anyone who witnessed the incident to come forward.

Police are particularly interested in hearing from anyone who was on the Central line platforms between approximately 10.30pm and 11pm that evening and may have information that could assist the investigation.

The investigation remains ongoing as police work to establish the full circumstances surrounding the fatal assault.

Attached is a news article regarding a 32 year old man who died at Liverpool train station

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/liverpool-st-station-death-assault-notting-hill-carnival-b1295479.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Teenager Becomes Second Victim of Rare ‘Brain-Eating Amoeba’ Infection

A teenager in central North Carolina has died after contracting a rare and devastating infection caused by Naegleria fowleri, commonly referred to as the “brain-eating amoeba”.

Health officials confirmed the death on August 27, making the teenager the second person in the United States to die from the infection in roughly two weeks. Authorities have not released the teenager’s identity out of respect for the family’s privacy.

The announcement came shortly after the death of eight-year-old Lillian Smart in Louisiana. Lillian’s family said she died after suffering severe brain injuries caused by the infection. Health officials believe she may have been exposed while swimming in Lake Claiborne.

What is the ‘brain-eating amoeba’?

Naegleria fowleri is a microscopic organism that naturally occurs in warm freshwater, including lakes, rivers and ponds.

The infection is extremely rare. However, when it does occur, the consequences can be devastating. The amoeba can enter the body when contaminated water is forced up the nose, allowing it to travel towards the brain and cause a serious infection known as primary amebic meningoencephalitis

Importantly, people do not become infected simply by swallowing contaminated water, and the infection does not normally spread from person to person.

Symptoms can develop rapidly

Early symptoms can include a severe headache, fever, nausea and vomiting. As the infection progresses, patients can develop a stiff neck, seizures, confusion and eventually coma.

Because the disease progresses extremely quickly and is so uncommon, diagnosing it can be difficult.

How can people reduce the risk?

Health authorities recommend taking precautions when swimming or participating in water activities in warm freshwater.

People can reduce their exposure by keeping their head above the water, holding their nose or using nose clips, avoiding diving or jumping into warm freshwater and avoiding disturbing sediment at the bottom of lakes and ponds.

Officials stress that while Naegleria fowleri can sound frightening, infection remains extraordinarily rare.

For the North Carolina teenager’s family, however, the rare infection has resulted in an unimaginable loss, while health officials continue investigating where the exposure occurred.

Attached is a news article regarding a brain eating disorder called amoeba

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79ven0xxyqo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Tuesday, 1 September 2026

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Svetoslav Stoykov: The Shocking Berlin Subway Attack That Left a Woman Seriously Injured

A shocking act of violence in Berlin became an international news story after CCTV captured a man kicking a woman down a flight of stairs at a subway station.

The attacker was identified as Svetoslav Stoykov, a Bulgarian national who was 27 at the time of his arrest. The incident happened at Hermannstraße U-Bahn station in Berlin in October 2016.

A Completely Unexpected Attack

CCTV footage showed a 26-year-old woman walking down the stairs towards the platform when Stoykov approached from behind. He kicked her in the back, causing her to fall headfirst down the stairs and onto the platform.

The woman suffered a broken arm and injuries to her head and face and required hospital treatment. The footage also showed Stoykov walking away from the scene while the injured woman remained on the platform and bystanders came to her assistance.

The disturbing images were eventually released publicly by Berlin police after investigators struggled to identify the attacker. The video quickly spread around the world, generating widespread anger and concern.

Stoykov Was Eventually Arrested

After the footage became public, a major search was launched for the man responsible. Stoykov was eventually arrested at a coach station in Berlin after travelling back from France, where he had reportedly been staying with relatives.

The case initially involved consideration of a more serious charge, including attempted murder, but prosecutors ultimately pursued a charge relating to grievous bodily harm after determining that there was insufficient evidence to establish an intention to kill.

What He Told the Court

During his 2017 trial, Stoykov accepted responsibility for the attack but said he could not remember committing it.

He told the court that he had consumed large amounts of alcohol and drugs before the incident. A medical expert also gave evidence concerning brain injuries Stoykov had previously suffered in a serious road accident and their possible effect on his behaviour and ability to control his actions.

Stoykov apologised to the victim during the proceedings and expressed regret over what had happened.

The Victim’s Life Was Changed

The physical injuries were only part of the consequences. During the trial, the victim described the psychological impact of the attack, explaining that she became afraid to go out alone and stopped studying for a period following the incident.

The case demonstrated how a single violent act in a public place can have consequences far beyond the immediate physical injuries.

Prison Sentence

In July 2017, a Berlin court sentenced Stoykov to 35 months — two years and 11 months — in prison for the attack.

The case remains remembered because of the extraordinary CCTV footage and the seemingly sudden nature of the assault. It also became a reminder of the vulnerability of people using public transport and the importance of surveillance footage in helping police identify violent offenders.

Importantly, later misinformation surrounding the video falsely portrayed the attacker as belonging to a particular religious or migrant group. Contemporary reporting identified Stoykov as Bulgarian, and there was no evidence establishing a religious motive for the assault.

The incident was ultimately a case of brutal, apparently unprovoked violence that left a young woman physically injured and psychologically traumatised — while the CCTV footage played a crucial role in bringing the attacker before the courts.

Attached is a news article regarding a man in Berlin who kicked a women down stairs

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-40518181

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Andy Burnham Faces Prison Crisis Head-On as IPP Sentences Expose Deep Problems in Britain’s Justice System

By 222 News

Prime Minister Andy Burnham is facing one of the biggest challenges of his government: how to deal with an overcrowded prison system while maintaining public protection and addressing the long-running controversy surrounding Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences.

IPP sentences were introduced in England and Wales in 2005 for offenders considered dangerous but who did not receive a life sentence. Although the system was abolished for new cases in 2012, it was not abolished retrospectively, leaving thousands of people subject to the legacy of the scheme. Critics have argued that some prisoners have remained behind bars long after completing the minimum tariff imposed by the courts.

A prison system under extreme pressure

The IPP issue has become particularly important as Britain’s prisons approach capacity. Adult male prisons are operating at around 98% capacity, creating intense pressure on the government to find additional space while avoiding releases that could place the public at risk.

Burnham’s government has therefore been examining several options, including changes to prisoner release arrangements, deportation of eligible foreign national offenders and action on the remaining IPP population.

The Prime Minister has also faced political pressure after his government initially proposed a major early-release programme. Following criticism from victims’ families, opposition parties and others, Burnham tightened the scheme and excluded a number of serious offences from early release.

The IPP problem

The central question surrounding IPP sentences is whether the current system continues to deliver justice when a prisoner has completed the minimum punishment originally imposed by the court but remains incarcerated because they have not demonstrated that they can safely be released.

The problem is particularly complicated because IPP prisoners are not simply serving an ordinary fixed-term sentence. Their continued detention can depend on assessments of future risk and whether they have made sufficient progress to satisfy the authorities responsible for their release.

Critics say this can create a system in which a person effectively does not know when their imprisonment will end.

There were still thousands of people affected by the IPP legacy in recent years, including prisoners who had remained in custody continuously since their original conviction. The Justice Select Committee previously described the IPP system as fundamentally flawed and called for further legislative action.

What has gone wrong?

The problem is bigger than simply the number of prisoners.

Britain’s prison crisis has developed through a combination of longer sentences, overcrowding, pressure on probation, court backlogs, limited rehabilitation opportunities and an increasing number of prisoners being recalled to custody.

Parliamentary evidence has highlighted the growing recall population, with recalled prisoners accounting for 15% of the prison population at the end of March 2025.

This creates a cycle.

A prisoner may need rehabilitation and psychological support before release. But an overcrowded prison system can make it harder to provide courses, assessments and programmes quickly. If progress is delayed, release can also be delayed.

At the same time, probation services must supervise people after release, despite already facing significant workloads.

Burnham’s difficult balancing act

Burnham is now attempting to balance two competing responsibilities: protecting the public while fixing a prison system that cannot continue operating indefinitely at near-full capacity.

His government has indicated that the IPP legacy needs to be addressed, with plans reported to involve ending the remaining indefinite sentences by 2029.

But releasing IPP prisoners cannot simply mean opening the prison gates.

A serious reform programme would need to establish who can safely return to the community, what rehabilitation they require, how victims can be protected and whether probation services have sufficient staff and resources to supervise them.

Electronic monitoring, restrictions on movement and other post-release measures are among the tools being considered for managing risk.

The real diagnosis

The IPP controversy exposes a deeper weakness in Britain’s criminal justice system: sentencing someone is only one part of the justice process.

If the state imposes an indefinite sentence because of concerns about future risk, it also has a responsibility to provide a realistic pathway for that individual to demonstrate that the risk has been reduced.

Without adequate rehabilitation, mental-health support, offending-behaviour programmes, parole assessments and probation supervision, an indefinite sentence can become extremely difficult to resolve.

That is why campaigners and prison reform organisations have argued that the remaining IPP population needs a comprehensive solution rather than simply being managed from year to year.

A defining test for Andy Burnham

For Burnham, the IPP issue could become one of the defining tests of his premiership.

He must demonstrate that prison reform does not mean being soft on serious crime. Equally, the government must demonstrate that keeping people in prison indefinitely is not being used as a substitute for effective rehabilitation and risk management.

The challenge is therefore not simply how many prisoners can be released.

It is whether Britain can build a justice system in which punishment, rehabilitation, public protection and victims’ rights work together.

The IPP legacy has been described by critics as one of the most serious unresolved problems in modern English and Welsh sentencing. Burnham now has an opportunity to provide a lasting solution—but that solution will need to be carefully designed, properly funded and centred on public safety.

The prison crisis may have forced the issue onto the political agenda. The IPP scandal has now raised a much bigger question:

Attached is a news article regarding Andy burnham speech regarding the IPP prison sentencing

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/08/30/burnham-risks-freeing-hundreds-of-dangerous-criminals/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Monday, 31 August 2026

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Duane “Keffe D” Davis Found Guilty of Tupac Shakur’s Murder After Nearly 30 Years

LAS VEGAS — Nearly three decades after the murder of hip-hop legend Tupac Shakur, a Las Vegas jury has found Duane “Keffe D” Davis guilty of first-degree murder with a deadly weapon, bringing a major development to one of the most famous unsolved cases in music history.

Davis, 63, was convicted on Monday, August 31, 2026, after jurors deliberated for approximately three hours. Prosecutors accused him of organising the September 7, 1996, drive-by shooting that ultimately claimed Tupac’s life.

Tupac’s final night

Tupac Shakur was just 25 years old when he was shot while travelling in a BMW driven by Death Row Records co-founder Marion “Suge” Knight in Las Vegas.

A white Cadillac pulled alongside the vehicle at a red light and gunfire erupted. Tupac was struck several times and died six days later from his injuries. Knight survived the attack.

The shooting followed an earlier confrontation at the MGM Grand involving Tupac’s associates and Orlando “Baby Lane” Anderson, Davis’ nephew. Prosecutors argued that the confrontation became the motive for a retaliatory attack against Tupac and those associated with Death Row Records.

Davis did not pull the trigger

One of the most important aspects of the case is that prosecutors did not allege Davis personally fired the fatal shots.

Instead, prosecutors argued that Davis played a leadership role in organising the attack, providing the weapon and directing the men involved. Under Nevada law, a person who helps organise or directs a murder can be held criminally responsible even if they are not the person who pulls the trigger.

The prosecution relied heavily on statements Davis had made over the years, including interviews and material connected with his 2019 memoir, Compton Street Legend. Prosecutors argued that Davis had repeatedly described his involvement in the events surrounding Tupac’s killing.

Defence challenged Davis’ own statements

Davis pleaded not guilty and his defence challenged the prosecution’s interpretation of his previous statements.

His lawyers argued that Davis had exaggerated or fabricated parts of his story, including material published for financial gain, and questioned whether the prosecution had sufficient physical evidence connecting him directly to the shooting.

Despite the defence arguments, the jury ultimately accepted the prosecution’s case and returned a unanimous guilty verdict.

A case that changed hip-hop history

Tupac Shakur’s murder became one of the biggest mysteries in popular music. For almost 30 years, theories surrounding who was responsible continued to circulate among fans, investigators and the wider hip-hop community.

Davis’ conviction represents the first conviction in connection with Tupac’s killing, closing a major chapter in a case that remained unresolved for decades.

Davis was arrested in 2023 after years of public statements about the killing. The prosecution’s case ultimately centred on his own words and his alleged role in organising the attack.

What happens next?

Davis now faces the possibility of life imprisonment, with sentencing still to come. He has indicated that he intends to appeal the conviction.

For Tupac’s family, friends and millions of fans around the world, the guilty verdict represents a dramatic moment in a case that has remained part of hip-hop history since that September night in Las Vegas.

Almost 30 years after Tupac Shakur’s death, the question of criminal responsibility has finally reached a courtroom verdict.

Attached is a news article regarding the murderer of Tupac found guilty

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2026/aug/31/tupac-shakur-killing-duane-keith-davis

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Luton Faces Growing Concern Over High Number of Stray Cats

Luton, Bedfordshire — Concerns are growing over the number of stray and abandoned cats being seen across Luton, with animal-welfare organisations facing continued pressure to care for unwanted cats and kittens.

Local reports have highlighted the scale of the problem, with a charity previously warning that Luton had significantly higher numbers of stray cats than some other areas. However, there is no reliable current figure establishing exactly how many stray cats are living on the streets of Luton.

The issue is being tackled by local animal-welfare groups. ANIMALS AT RISK SHELTER is based in Luton, while Cats Protection’s Luton, Dunstable & District branch provides support for cats and kittens across the area, including assistance with neutering, lost and found cats and finding permanent homes.

One of the major concerns is uncontrolled breeding. Cats that are not neutered can produce multiple litters, meaning a small number of unowned cats can quickly develop into a much larger population. Kittens born outside homes can also face illness, injuries, starvation and exposure to traffic.

Another challenge is distinguishing between a genuinely stray cat and a pet that is allowed to roam. Some cats regularly seen outdoors may have owners who are unaware that their animals are being mistaken for strays.

Local rescue organisations therefore stress the importance of checking whether a cat is owned before assuming it has been abandoned. Microchipping, neutering and responsible ownership can all play an important role in reducing the number of cats entering the stray population.

The charity Stray Cat Rescue also works with unwanted and stray cats in the wider Bedfordshire area. Meanwhile, Feline Cat Rescue is registered as a charity that takes in unwanted, abandoned and stray cats and kittens in Luton.

For Luton, the growing concern is not simply about the number of cats being seen on the streets. It is about whether local rescue organisations have enough volunteers, funding, foster homes and veterinary resources to deal with the animals needing help.

Animal welfare campaigners say preventing unwanted litters is one of the most effective ways to tackle the problem in the long term. Without greater emphasis on neutering, microchipping, responsible ownership and rehoming, the number of stray and abandoned cats could continue to place pressure on local rescue services.

The situation highlights a wider issue facing communities across Britain: when unwanted animals are left without proper care, the responsibility often falls on charities and volunteers who rely heavily on public donations and support.

Attached is a news article regarding the high number of stray cats in Luton

https://www.lutontoday.co.uk/news/people/cat-watch-scheme-will-help-lutons-stray-cats-3023850

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Ivanka Trump Shows Off Her Surfing Skills During Costa Rica Family Getaway

Ivanka Trump has swapped the political spotlight for the waves, showing off her surfing abilities during a family holiday in Costa Rica.

The 44-year-old businesswoman and former White House adviser was photographed surfing off the Costa Rican coast on August 23, as she enjoyed an active break with her family.

Dressed in a white long-sleeved surf top with black bottoms, Ivanka climbed onto a soft-top longboard and took on the waves with the assistance of a surf instructor. Photographs showed her successfully standing on the board and maintaining her balance as she moved through the water.

At one point, she appeared confident enough to raise her hand in a traditional “shaka” gesture associated with surfing. But the session was not completely flawless — she was also photographed falling from the board before getting back up and continuing to surf.

Surfing Has Become a Regular Hobby

The Costa Rica trip is not Ivanka’s first experience with surfing. Reports indicate that she has returned to the country several times and has previously taken surfing lessons there.

Her connection with Costa Rica reportedly stretches back several years, with visits involving beaches around the Nicoya Peninsula and other popular coastal destinations. A local surf-school owner previously said that Ivanka and members of her family had been taking lessons for several years.

The latest photographs suggest that her experience is paying off. Rather than simply posing with a surfboard, Ivanka was repeatedly photographed getting to her feet, riding waves and returning to the water after falling.

A Family Escape

The surfing session formed part of a wider family getaway. Ivanka has been photographed enjoying a range of outdoor activities during the trip, including spending time with her children.

She was also photographed horseback riding along the beach with her eldest daughter, Arabella, during the Costa Rica holiday.

For Ivanka Trump, the trip provides a very different setting from the political world associated with her family name. Away from Washington and the White House, she has been able to focus on family, outdoor activities and one of her increasingly familiar hobbies — surfing.

Her latest Costa Rican adventure has now attracted international attention, with images of her balancing on the board, catching waves and recovering from a fall providing a glimpse into the more adventurous side of her life.

Attached is a news article regarding Ivanka Trump showing off her surfing skills in Costa Rica

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/ivanka-trump-takes-surfing-lesson-costa-rica-family-beach-vacation-getaway.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

California Man Arrested Again After Allegedly Sniffing Women in Stores

A California man who has gained notoriety online for allegedly approaching women and sniffing their buttocks has been arrested again, with police investigating another series of incidents in Glendale.

Calese Carron Crowder, 39, was arrested on Friday afternoon after employees at two Glendale businesses reported a man behaving suspiciously around customers and allegedly bending down behind people. According to Glendale police, investigators reviewed surveillance footage from both locations and identified Crowder as the suspect.

Police later located Crowder nearby and arrested him on suspicion of a parole violation. One of the businesses was reportedly a Marshalls store, while a nearby grocery store also contacted police after a customer was allegedly seen bending down behind shoppers and attempting to sniff them. The investigation is continuing, and police say the case will be submitted to prosecutors for possible criminal charges.

A history of similar allegations

Crowder has previously been arrested in connection with similar incidents in the Glendale and Burbank areas. His alleged behaviour first attracted widespread attention in 2023, when a video circulated online appearing to show him following a woman around a Barnes & Noble store and getting close to her from behind.

The allegations resurfaced in July 2025, when Burbank police arrested Crowder following a report at a Nordstrom Rack. Authorities said surveillance footage appeared to show him following a female shopper, crouching behind her and allegedly sniffing her buttocks. He was subsequently arrested again the following month after another alleged incident at a Burbank Walgreens.

Police have previously said that complaints involving similar alleged behaviour date back to 2021.

Registered sex offender and parole history

Crowder is a registered sex offender and has previously been on parole. His criminal history also includes convictions involving burglary and robbery, while he was sentenced in 2023 for indecent exposure. He has subsequently faced additional parole-related legal proceedings.

The latest arrest has once again raised questions about how authorities deal with repeat offenders when allegations of unwanted behaviour continue to emerge.

However, an arrest is not a conviction, and the latest allegations against Crowder will have to be considered through the criminal justice process.

The Glendale investigation remains ongoing, with prosecutors expected to determine whether additional criminal charges should be brought.

Attached is a News article regarding a man who likes to sniff women’s butts was arrested for the 4th time

https://ktul.com/news/nation-world/sex-offender-nicknamed-serial-butt-sniffer-on-social-media-arrested-again-in-california-calese-carron-crowder-crime-lewd-behavior-shopping-loitering-buttocks-rear-end

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156