Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Former New Jersey Teacher Julie Rizzitello Jailed for Sexual Assault of Students

A former high school English teacher in the United States has been sentenced to prison after admitting to sexually abusing teenage students under her care.

Julie Rizzitello, 37, previously worked at Wall Township High School in New Jersey. She pleaded guilty to multiple counts of second-degree sexual assault involving two male students, according to prosecutors in Monmouth County.

Abuse of Position

Court documents revealed that the offences began after Rizzitello developed inappropriate relationships with the students while they were enrolled at the school. Prosecutors described a pattern of grooming behaviour, in which she built trust and emotional dependency before engaging in unlawful sexual conduct.

The abuse reportedly occurred in several locations over an extended period, including private residences and other settings away from school grounds.

Arrest and Conviction

Rizzitello was arrested in 2024 following an investigation by local law enforcement. She later entered guilty pleas in court, avoiding a trial.

In February 2026, a judge sentenced her to 10 years in state prison. In addition to her custodial sentence, she must:

• Register as a sex offender

• Comply with lifetime parole supervision

• Have no contact with the victims

• Forfeit her teaching credentials

The judge described the case as a serious breach of trust, emphasising the responsibility educators hold in safeguarding children.

Community Response

The case has prompted renewed discussions in the local community about safeguarding procedures in schools and the importance of reporting inappropriate conduct. Authorities praised the victims for coming forward and cooperating with investigators.

School officials reiterated their commitment to student protection policies and ensuring a safe learning environment.

Attached is a news article regarding Julie rizzitello arrested and sentenced to prison for raping a 14 year old boy 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-teacher-who-slept-students-family-bagel-shop-learns-prison-sentence.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Alexei Navalny ‘Killed by Dart Frog Toxin’, UK and European Allies Allege

LONDON / MUNICH, 14–15 Feb 2026 — A coalition of Western governments has issued a dramatic and detailed accusation that Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny was poisoned with a lethal toxin derived from the skin of poison dart frogs — and that Russia is responsible for his death.  

In a joint statement released during the Munich Security Conference, the foreign ministries of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands said analyses of biological samples taken from Navalny’s body “conclusively confirmed the presence of epibatidine” — a rare neurotoxin normally found only in wild poison dart frogs in South America.  

What the Allies Say the Evidence Shows

According to the statement:

• Epibatidine, a potent toxin not naturally present in Russia, was found in body samples linked to Navalny.  

• The presence of this substance — which can cause fatal respiratory and neurological damage — strongly indicates deliberate poisoning rather than natural causes.  

• The five governments claim that only the Russian state had the “means, motive and opportunity” to administer such a toxin while Navalny was imprisoned.  

• They are reporting the findings to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), asserting that this would breach international chemical weapons conventions.  

Navalny’s Death — Background

Alexei Navalny, Russia’s most prominent opposition figure, died on 16 February 2024 while serving a 19-year prison sentence in a remote Arctic penal colony — a punishment widely seen in the West as politically motivated.  

Russian authorities initially claimed Navalny died of natural causes, citing health issues. But his widow, Yulia Navalnaya, and Western officials contested that explanation, and Navalny had previously survived a 2020 poisoning attempt with a nerve agent widely attributed to Russian operatives.  

At last year’s Munich Security Conference, Navalnaya publicly alleged her husband had been poisoned. On Saturday, she welcomed the new findings as confirmation of what she already believed — that Navalny’s death was a deliberate killing, saying the evidence now amounts to a “science-proven fact.”  

Western Reaction and Next Steps

Top European diplomats have portrayed the revelations as part of a broader pattern of Russian use of chemical agents against opponents, referencing past cases such as the 2018 Salisbury nerve agent attack and the 2006 assassination of Alexander Litvinenko with radioactive polonium.  

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper and her counterparts say they will pursue accountability mechanisms through international law and are urging further action from other nations and organisations.  

Russian Government Response

Moscow has firmly rejected the accusations, dismissing them as Western propaganda and a political effort to shift attention from broader geopolitical issues. Russian officials maintain that Navalny’s death was due to natural causes, challenging the scientific and interpretive basis of the Western analysis.  

Significance

If the claims stand up to further scrutiny and independent verification, they would mark one of the most serious allegations of state-sanctioned chemical killing of a political opponent in recent decades — further straining relations between Russia and European powers and intensifying global criticism of the Kremlin’s conduct.  

Attached is a news article regarding alexei navalny killed by Russian dart with frog toxin 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyk4lz4e3eo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Ex-Google Engineer Convicted for Stealing AI Trade Secrets to Benefit China

In a landmark legal decision that highlights growing concerns over intellectual property theft in the tech sector, a U.S. federal jury in San Francisco has found former Google software engineer Linwei “Leon” Ding, 38, guilty on multiple serious charges related to the theft of artificial intelligence (AI) trade secrets for the benefit of entities linked to the People’s Republic of China (PRC).  

The verdict, delivered after an 11-day trial before U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, marks the first known conviction in the United States on AI-related economic espionage charges — a milestone in how the legal system is responding to the intersection of cutting-edge technology, national security, and corporate confidentiality.  

The Crime and Conviction

Ding, who joined Google in 2019 as a software engineer working on supercomputing infrastructure for the company’s advanced AI projects, was convicted on seven counts of economic espionage and seven counts of theft of trade secrets. Prosecutors showed that between approximately May 2022 and April 2023, while still employed at the company, Ding illicitly copied and transmitted over 2,000 pages of highly confidential Google documents to personal accounts — including a Google Cloud account — without authorization.  

The stolen material reportedly included detailed information on:

• Google’s custom AI hardware architectures, such as Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) and Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) systems.  

• Core software platforms used to orchestrate and manage machine learning workloads across Google’s supercomputing data centers.  

• Technical specifications for high-speed networking technology such as custom SmartNIC cards.  

Prosecutors argued that Ding used his privileged access to essentially shortcut years of development work, giving foreign competitors insights into some of Google’s most sensitive AI infrastructure technology.  

Affiliations with China and Motive

While employed at Google, Ding allegedly secretly affiliated himself with two China-based technology companies. In mid-2022, he held discussions to become chief technology officer of an early-stage Chinese firm and soon after founded his own AI startup — Shanghai Zhisuan Technology Co. — positioning himself as CEO.  

Court evidence showed that Ding told potential investors he could replicate Google’s AI supercomputing capabilities using the stolen trade secrets. He also applied for a Shanghai government-sponsored “talent program,” stating his intention to help China achieve computing power infrastructure on par with global leaders — an indication of how these trade secrets might be used to advance competitive ambitions abroad.  

National Security and Legal Significance

Officials from the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI stressed the broader implications of the case. The theft of confidential AI technology not only threatens the economic competitiveness of U.S. companies but also carries national security implications, given the strategic importance of artificial intelligence in future technologies and defense systems.  

Assistant Attorney General for National Security John A. Eisenberg described the theft as a “calculated breach of trust” at a critical moment in AI development, while FBI counterintelligence leaders emphasized their commitment to protecting American technological innovations.  

Potential Sentencing and Future Proceedings

Ding is scheduled to appear at a status conference on February 3, 2026, ahead of sentencing. If given the maximum penalties under U.S. law, he faces up to 15 years in prison for each count of economic espionage and 10 years for each count of theft of trade secrets, along with substantial fines.  

The case reinforces the seriousness with which the U.S. legal system is beginning to treat the protection of AI and other advanced technologies, especially as global competition intensifies and concerns about the misuse of intellectual property — whether by foreign states, corporations, or individuals — grow ever more acute.

Attached is a news article regarding goggle engineer found guilty of releasing AI trades secrets in china 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-google-engineer-found-guilty-economic-espionage-and-theft-confidential-ai-technology

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Largest Bat Ever Found: Giants of the Sky

When most people think of bats, they imagine tiny night-fliers swooping about catching mosquitoes. But look deeper into the world of Chiroptera, and you find some truly astonishing sizes — from massive fruit-eating megabats to now-extinct prehistoric vampires.  

🛩️ Living Giants: Flying Foxes That Dwarf the Rest

Among living bats, the champions are not the insect hunters of European attics but the tropical flying foxes — megabats with wingspans broader than many birds of prey.

• The largest of these is the giant golden-crowned flying fox (Acerodon jubatus), native to the Philippines. This incredible species boasts a wingspan of around 1.5–1.7 m (5–5.6 ft) — wider than many people are tall — and can weigh over 1 kg (2–3 lb).  

• Close rivals include the Indian flying fox (Pteropus medius) and the great flying fox (Pteropus neohibernicus), both reaching similar weights and wingspans, making them some of the heaviest and biggest bats alive today.  

These majestic megabats don’t hunt insects; instead, they glide gracefully over tropical forests in search of fruit, nectar, and flowers — pollinating and spreading seeds as they go, making them ecological keystones in their environments.  

🦴 Prehistoric Titans: The Largest Bat Ever Discovered

While contemporary bats can be remarkably large, the fossil record suggests that ancient bats once reached extraordinary proportions — though not all prehistoric reports stand up to scrutiny.

One of the most intriguing extinct species is the giant vampire bat, Desmodus draculae. Despite its fearsome name, this bat did not match the wingspan of modern flying foxes. However, it was the largest vampire bat species ever known.  

• D. draculae lived in Central and South America throughout the Pleistocene (up to around 11,700 years ago). Based on fossil skulls and skeletal remains, this species was about 30 % larger than today’s vampire bats.  

• Estimates suggest a wingspan around 50 cm (≈20 in) — modest compared with flying foxes — and a body mass near 60 g (~2 oz). Although relatively small by bat standards, its size was exceptional for a blood-feeding species.  

🦇 Key Points: The Largest Bat Ever Found

• Largest living bat: Giant golden-crowned flying fox

• Wingspan up to 1.7 metres (5.6 ft)

• Weighs around 1–1.2 kg

• Native to the Philippines

• Eats fruit (not blood) and plays a vital role in forest pollination

• Other giant living species:

• Indian flying fox

• Great flying fox

• Both can reach similar wingspans and heavy body weights

• Largest vampire bat ever discovered (extinct):

• Desmodus draculae

• Lived during the Pleistocene era

• Around 30% larger than modern vampire bats

• Estimated wingspan about 50 cm (20 inches)

• Important fact:

• The biggest bats in history by wingspan are still living today (flying fox species).

• Prehistoric bats were not larger in wingspan than today’s megabats.

Attached is a news article regarding the largest flying bat ever found 

https://www.reddit.com/r/AIDKE/comments/1bu25dv/giant_goldencrowned_flying_fox_acerodon_jubatus/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

King Charles Proudly Reflects on Half a Century of The King’s Trust Transforming Young Lives

His Majesty King Charles III has issued a heartfelt statement marking the 50th anniversary of The King’s Trust — the youth charity he founded in 1976 — celebrating its remarkable journey from a modest initiative into one of the UK’s most influential social impact organisations.  

Established originally as The Prince’s Trust using his Royal Navy severance pay of £7,400, the organisation was created at a time of rising unemployment and social unrest with a clear mission: to support disadvantaged young people to build confidence, develop skills, find employment, and unlock opportunities that might otherwise remain out of reach.  

In a video message released to commemorate the milestone, King Charles said he was “so very pleased, and proud” of how The King’s Trust’s work has continued “to go from strength to strength” over the last half-century. He highlighted the transformative impact the charity has had on young lives across the UK and beyond.  

A Legacy of Empowerment and Achievement

Over the past 50 years, The King’s Trust has supported more than 1.3 million young people, helping them grow in confidence, continue in education, find sustainable employment, and — in the UK alone — launch over 92,000 new businesses.  

King Charles emphasised that the core principle on which the charity was founded — that young people can make an enormous contribution to society when given the skills and confidence to realise their potential — remains as vital today as ever. He acknowledged that while the challenges facing young people may evolve, their “spirit and resilience remain constant,” and that The King’s Trust will continue to stand beside them as they prepare for the demands of an ever-changing world of work.  

Growth, Impact and Beyond the UK

What began as a UK-focused initiative has grown into a global network. Through affiliated organisations including King’s Trust International, the charity now runs programmes in regions such as the Commonwealth, North America, and beyond, extending opportunities for education, training and enterprise to young people across continents.  

Research conducted by The King’s Trust suggests its work has contributed at least £11.4 billion to society, underlining not just individual success stories but broad economic and social value.  

Continuing the Mission

In his message, the King reaffirmed his belief in the organisation’s guiding mission: that with confidence, skills, and determination, young people can thrive and contribute meaningfully to their communities. He pledged ongoing support for programmes that help to build personal resilience and professional capability — central pillars in the pursuit of more stable, fulfilling futures for generations to come.  

As The King’s Trust steps into its sixth decade, King Charles’s statement serves both as a celebration of past achievements and a declaration of continued commitment to young people — a legacy that began with a modest act of personal investment and has grown into a cornerstone of youth opportunity and empowerment.  

Attached is a news article regarding King Charles statement regarding the kings trust trust 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/charles-kings-trust-anniversary-50-b2906993.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

China Declares Cryptocurrency Activities Financial Crimes and Reinforces Total Ban

Beijing, China — In a sweeping reaffirmation of its long-standing hostility toward private digital currencies, the Chinese government has reinforced a comprehensive ban on cryptocurrency activities — declaring them illegal financial operations and subject to criminal investigation under national law.  

The policy, issued on 6 February 2026 by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) together with eight major government departments, makes clear that virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, and other crypto tokens do not have legal status as money in the People’s Republic of China. It states that any business activity involving cryptocurrencies — including trading, exchange, issuance and related financial services — constitutes illegal financial activity and is strictly prohibited.  

Illegal Financial Activity and Criminal Liability

Under the new directive, virtual currency–related business activities are explicitly classified as illegal and subject to enforcement actions. The notice clarifies that engaging in such activities can trigger investigations for criminal liability under Chinese law. Activities targeted include:

• Trading or exchanging cryptocurrency for fiat currency.

• Operating virtual currency trading platforms.

• Providing services that support or facilitate crypto transactions.

• Issuing tokens or engaging in fundraising via cryptocurrencies.  

The central bank and regulators have stressed that private crypto assets “do not have the same legal status as fiat currencies,” such as the renminbi, and therefore cannot be used in commerce or finance within China’s regulated economic system.  

Expanded Restrictions: Overseas Issuance and Stablecoins

In addition to domestic bans, Chinese authorities have also tightened controls on overseas cryptocurrency issuance. Domestic entities — and even their controlled offshore affiliates — are forbidden from issuing cryptocurrencies or stablecoins pegged to the yuan without prior approval from regulators. This marks an effort to prevent companies from bypassing domestic bans by operating from abroad.  

Stablecoins — digital tokens typically pegged to a fiat currency — have also been placed under scrutiny, with regulators warning that they pose risks of money laundering, fraud, and unauthorized cross-border fund transfers if not subject to strict identity verification and anti-money-laundering standards.  

The Rationale Behind China’s Hard Line

Chinese regulators have long argued that cryptocurrencies are a threat to financial stability and economic order. Authorities claim that speculative crypto trading can fuel illegal fundraising schemes, fraud, and other criminal conduct, while also undermining the government’s control of monetary policy.  

This stance goes hand-in-hand with China’s development of its own digital yuan (e-CNY) — a state-issued central bank digital currency — which the government promotes as the only legitimate digital currency for national use. Against this backdrop, private cryptocurrencies are portrayed by Beijing as inherently risky and unsuitable for mainstream financial systems.  

Ongoing Enforcement and Public Messaging

Officials have called on multiple government agencies to coordinate enforcement efforts, monitor online and financial channels for illicit crypto activity, and educate the public on the potential dangers of engaging in unregulated digital currencies. Law enforcement agencies continue to pursue cases linked to money laundering and fraud tied to cryptocurrencies.  

Despite these restrictions, some cryptocurrency mining and trading activity still persists informally or underground, though it remains officially illegal within China’s jurisdiction.  

Attached is a news article regarding china banning cryptocurrency saying it’s a financial crime 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-58678907.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Russia Blocks WhatsApp Nationwide in Major Tech Crackdown

Moscow 

Russian authorities have fully blocked access to the Meta-owned messaging app WhatsApp, cutting off one of the country’s most widely used communication platforms for around 100 million users. The move marks a significant escalation in Moscow’s campaign to tighten control over digital communications and promote home-grown alternatives.  

According to official statements, the Kremlin’s decision stems from WhatsApp’s alleged failure to comply with Russian laws and regulatory demands. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that the app’s refusal to meet legal requirements — particularly around data access and cooperation with authorities — left the government with little choice but to impose a block.  

In response, Russian officials have urged citizens to shift to a state-backed messaging service called MAX, which authorities describe as a secure “national messenger.” MAX is already pre-installed on many devices sold in the country and is being positioned as a Russian alternative to foreign platforms. 

What the Block Means

The removal of WhatsApp isn’t just a technical change — it’s part of a broader geopolitical and regulatory agenda:

• 📱 Mass Impact: Up to 100 million people in Russia relied on WhatsApp for daily communication, from private chats to business messaging. Its block affects individuals, families, and enterprises alike.  

• 🔒 Security & Privacy Concerns: Meta has criticised the ban, arguing that isolating users from an end-to-end encrypted platform is a “backwards step,” potentially making communications less safe.  

• 🛰 Sovereign Internet Push: The block fits within Moscow’s long-term strategy of building a “sovereign internet” — a tightly regulated digital environment where foreign tech companies must adhere to strict domestic laws or leave the market.  

• 📶 Workarounds & VPNs: Some users are now relying on virtual private networks (VPNs) and other tools to access blocked services, though these are increasingly throttled by authorities. 

Why Russia Says It Took This Step

Russian regulators have justified the decision with several claims:

• Legal non-compliance: Authorities argue that WhatsApp failed to follow local regulations — especially related to criminal investigations and data sharing.  

• Fraud and security fears: Officials have alleged that foreign messaging apps are being used to organise illegal activity, although critics see these claims as pretexts.  

• Digital autonomy: The Kremlin says a domestic service — built, controlled or heavily influenced by Russian entities — better serves national interests than foreign platforms tied to Western firms. 

Critics’ Response & International Concerns

Rights groups and tech freedom advocates have sharply criticised the ban:

• 🔍 Threat to Privacy: MAX, the government-encouraged alternative, does not use the same level of encryption as WhatsApp and could allow greater access to user data by authorities, raising surveillance concerns.  

• 🗣 Free Speech: Observers regard the move as a part of Russia’s widening efforts to curb free expression and limit foreign influence online.  

• 🌐 Wider Crackdown: The block comes alongside ongoing restrictions on platforms like Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, Telegram, and others — all of which have seen degraded access or official bans in recent years.  

What Happens Next?

Meta has indicated that WhatsApp continues to explore ways to keep Russians connected. Meanwhile, Moscow maintains that compliance with Russian laws could eventually restore access — but only if foreign platforms agree to stringent oversight and data access measures.  

For many users, however, the block signals a shift toward a more insular and state-controlled digital environment, one where global platforms must either acquiesce to local rules or be pushed out entirely.

Attached is a news article regarding Russia issues a block on what’s app 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clygd10pg5lo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Record-Breaking 2,492-Carat Diamond Unearthed in Botswana Shocks the World

In a stunning testament to the riches hidden beneath the Earth’s surface, a 2,492-carat diamond — one of the largest ever discovered — has been unearthed deep within the southern African nation of Botswana. The gargantuan gemstone, roughly the size of a small fist, was recovered from the country’s famed Karowe Diamond Mine, operated by Canadian mining firm Lucara Diamond Corp.  

A Discovery a Century in the Making

The discovery, announced in August 2024, marks the largest diamond found in more than a century and is widely celebrated as the second-largest gem diamond ever mined. Only the legendary 3,106-carat Cullinan Diamond, unearthed in South Africa in 1905, surpasses it in sheer size.  

Botswana’s President Mokgweetsi Masisi personally viewed the stone during an unveiling ceremony in the capital, Gaborone, underscoring its national significance. Officials have yet to assign an official market value to the diamond, as assessments typically take time and depend on factors such as clarity, colour and eventual cutting.  

From Deep Underground to Global Spotlight

The immense rough diamond was detected using cutting-edge Mega Diamond Recovery X-ray Transmission (XRT) technology — an advanced system installed at Karowe to find large, high-value stones without damaging them in traditional crushing processes. This technology has already revolutionised diamond recovery at the mine, helping preserve massive stones that might otherwise be fragmented.  

Lucara’s leadership said the find reaffirms the mine’s reputation as one of the most prolific sources of giant diamonds on the planet, building on a streak of significant discoveries. In the past decade, the Karowe mine has produced other oversized gems, including the 1,758-carat Sewelô and the 1,109-carat Lesedi La Rona diamonds.  

A Gemstone of Global Importance

At a time when global diamond markets are facing challenges — with prices under pressure and synthetic alternatives growing — this extraordinary natural diamond has reignited interest in the value and allure of earth-mined gems. Botswana, which is the world’s second-largest diamond producer by value, depends heavily on the industry for export revenue and economic stability.  

Experts say the stone could fetch tens of millions of dollars once sold, depending on its characteristics and the outcome of cutting and polishing decisions by gemological specialists.  

Scientific and Cultural Significance

Natural diamonds like this are formed billions of years ago under extreme heat and pressure deep within the Earth. Their journey to the surface — carried by volcanic eruptions and trapped within kimberlite rock — is a remarkable geological story in itself.  

More than just a mineral treasure, the enormous 2,492-carat diamond has become a symbol of Botswana’s enduring legacy in global diamond discovery, drawing attention from collectors, scientists and luxury markets worldwide.

Attached is a news article regarding 2,492 carat diamond found in Botswana 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1w78rwlqvxo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Chaos in Ankara: A Brawl in the Heart of the Turkish Government

On 11–12 February 2026, Turkey’s Grand National Assembly — the country’s parliament in Ankara — descended into chaos as lawmakers engaged in a physical brawl during a highly charged political session. The confrontation erupted amid fierce opposition to a controversial appointment within President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s cabinet, exposing fault lines in Turkish politics and raising questions about the state of democratic norms in the country.  

Trigger: Controversial Appointment Sparks Outrage

The immediate catalyst for the melee was Erdoğan’s decision to appoint Akın Gürlek, a former Istanbul chief prosecutor, as the new justice minister. Opposition lawmakers from the Republican People’s Party (CHP) vehemently opposed the nomination, alleging that Gürlek played a central role in politically motivated prosecutions against opposition figures — most notably Ekrem İmamoğlu, the jailed former mayor of Istanbul and Erdoğan’s most formidable rival.  

As parliament prepared to administer the oath of office to Gürlek, CHP legislators attempted to block the proceedings. Tensions quickly escalated into a physical altercation, with MPs from both sides pushing, shoving and even throwing punches on the chamber floor. Dramatic video footage captured lawmakers grappling around the speaker’s podium, forcing parliamentary officials to suspend the session briefly. 

Statements and Reactions

The brawl drew condemnation from within the government itself. The Speaker of the Parliament, Numan Kurtulmuş, publicly denounced the violence, calling it “unbecoming of the dignity of the TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi)” and an affront to constitutional norms. Despite this, the appointment process continued, and Gürlek was eventually sworn in, protected by a cohort of ruling party MPs.  

CHP leaders blasted the appointment as part of a broader “judicial coup”, arguing that it undermined judicial independence and threatened the fairness of Turkey’s political process. Human rights groups and some foreign governments have echoed these concerns, pointing to a broader pattern of political pressure on the judiciary.  

Beyond the Brawl: Broader Political Stakes

The altercation is more than a mere spectacle of parliamentary discord — it reflects deep-seated institutional tensions within Turkey’s political landscape:

1. Political Polarization and Judicial Independence

Gürlek’s prosecution of CHP figures, especially the indictment of İmamoğlu — which involved more than 140 charges and sought sentences that exceeded 2,000 years — has been criticised by opposition leaders and international observers as politically motivated. This has intensified debate over the independence of Turkey’s judiciary and the balance of powers between the executive branch and democratic institutions.  

2. Cabinet Reshuffle Amid Other Challenges

Alongside appointing Gürlek, Erdoğan also named Mustafa Ciftci as the new interior minister — another move that drew attention due to the broader political context of corruption probes and security concerns across Turkey’s provinces.  

3. Constitutional Reform and Peace Initiatives

The cabinet reshuffle comes at a time when Turkey’s parliament is debating constitutional changes and advancing legislative steps tied to a potential peace process with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) — a decades-long conflict that has shaped Turkish domestic politics.  

Historical Context: Not the First Clash

Physical confrontations in Turkey’s parliament may seem dramatic, but they are not unprecedented. Previous scuffles occurred during heated debates over jailed lawmakers or contentious policy issues in 2024 and earlier years, underscoring recurring volatility in Turkish legislative politics when tempers flare on deeply divisive topics.  

What This Means for Turkey’s Future

The parliamentary brawl is emblematic of broader political fissures in Turkey at a time when the nation grapples with questions of judicial integrity, democratic norms, and political rivalry ahead of future elections. The clash has become a touchstone moment — cited by critics as evidence of eroding parliamentary decorum and by supporters as a symbol of uncompromising political struggle.

Attached is a news article regarding the brakeout distribution within the Turkish government 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7vzp3e62d4o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Will the Royal Family Help With the Epstein Investigation?”

ITV Reporter’s Question Puts Palace on the Spot — and Highlights Growing Pressure on the Monarchy

A routine public appearance turned into a moment of intense scrutiny this week when an ITV reporter directly asked King Charles III whether the royal family would assist with ongoing investigations linked to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein — whose network of sex trafficking and abuse has cast a long shadow over powerful figures around the world.  

During the encounter, filmed and broadcast by ITV News, the reporter specifically asked whether the royals would cooperate with authorities investigating new revelations tied to Epstein’s activities and documents recently made public. The clip quickly spread across social media and news outlets — partly because it captured a rare moment in which members of the royal household were pressed on a politically charged issue.  

Why the Question Matters

The renewed focus stems from documents released under the so-called “Epstein files,” which have included emails and images involving former Prince Andrew (Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor) — the King’s younger brother — and his association with Epstein years after the financier’s initial conviction. These files have drawn fresh investigations and political pressure on both sides of the Atlantic.  

Britain’s Education Secretary, Bridget Phillipson, has publicly urged that King Charles and the wider royal family “cooperate as much as they can” with investigations, including calls for Andrew to testify before U.S. lawmakers.  

Meanwhile, opposition politicians and commentators have echoed similar demands. Sir Keir Starmer, leader of the UK’s Labour Party, said anybody with relevant information should be prepared to share it with investigators — a comment widely interpreted as referring to Andrew’s position.  

Palace Reaction — and What It Says

Within hours of the ITV question airing, Buckingham Palace issued a statement making clear that the monarch and his household are prepared to support police inquiries if approached. The Palace stressed the distinction between the royal institution and the actions of individual members — noting that any specific allegations against Prince Andrew are for him to address directly, and that the family’s priority is support for victims.  

This marked one of the most explicit contrasts in tone from the Palace in recent years: while typically careful to avoid engagement with legal matters, the statement acknowledged “profound concern” about the allegations and affirmed a willingness to cooperate with Thames Valley Police — the force now looking into certain claims.  

In another incident reported this week, Queen Camilla was also asked if the royal family would help with the investigation during a public engagement — and chose not to answer before entering her scheduled event. Her silence was noted by several commentators as illustrative of the tightrope the monarchy is walking between non-interference and public accountability.  

Broader Royal Responses

Beyond the King’s comments, other senior royals have begun to address the issue publicly — albeit cautiously. The Prince and Princess of Wales released a statement expressing that they were “deeply concerned” by the latest Epstein files revelations and that their thoughts were with victims.  

Prince Edward has also spoken about the scandal — though not without controversy — becoming one of the first working royals to address the topic in detail.  

Public and Political Fallout

The repeated questions from journalists and hecklers alike underscore how the Epstein files have become a potential reputational crisis for the monarchy. Critics argue that failing to engage openly risks eroding public trust in the institution. Some commentators have even framed the royal response as appearing more defensive than transparent.  

Among politicians, there have also been calls for more decisive action — including demands that the King publicly address what he knew about his brother’s activities and that Prince Andrew make himself available to testify abroad.  

What Happens Next

At this stage, the investigation remains active, with Thames Valley Police assessing evidence and considering whether to launch a full criminal inquiry. The royal household’s statement of cooperation makes clear that, if formal requests are made by law enforcement, the monarchy is prepared to assist — but it has not volunteered additional information on its own initiative.  

The ITV reporter’s question — and the Palace’s response — will likely be seen as a defining moment in how the British royal family navigates accountability in the face of politically sensitive legal scrutiny. With public interest high and pressure from lawmakers continuing, how the institution responds in the coming weeks could shape its broader reputation for years to come.

Attached is a news article regarding a ITV reporter asking King Charles will he help with the Epstein investigation 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15531691/amp/King-Charles-heckled-questions-Jeffrey-Epstein-Dedham.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156