Thursday, 12 February 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Eight Countries That Will Pay You to Move There and Start a Business

With rising living costs and growing competition in major economies, some countries are flipping the script — offering financial incentives, grants and residency pathways to attract entrepreneurs willing to relocate and build businesses.

From Europe to Asia, governments facing population decline or seeking economic growth are actively encouraging foreign talent to settle down and invest. Here are eight countries that will effectively “pay” you — through grants, tax incentives or startup funding — to move there and build your future.

1. Ireland 🇮🇪

Incentive: Startup funding and tax benefits

Ireland’s Start-Up Entrepreneur Programme (STEP) offers non-EU entrepreneurs a pathway to residency if they launch an innovative business. Successful applicants can access funding support and benefit from Ireland’s competitive corporate tax rate (12.5%).

The country is particularly attractive for tech, fintech and pharmaceutical startups, with strong access to EU markets.

2. Portugal 🇵🇹

Incentive: Grants and startup visas

Portugal offers a Startup Visa and various regional incentives for entrepreneurs willing to base their business in less populated areas. Some regions provide financial support, tax breaks and even relocation grants.

Lisbon and Porto have become fast-growing startup hubs in Europe, offering lower costs than London or Berlin.

3. Spain 🇪🇸

Incentive: Digital nomad and entrepreneur visas

Spain has introduced entrepreneur-friendly visa schemes and tax incentives for foreign founders. Some rural municipalities also offer relocation grants to attract new residents and business activity.

The lifestyle benefits — climate, healthcare and lower living costs — are often as attractive as the financial perks.

4. Italy 🇮🇹

Incentive: Grants for moving to rural areas

Certain Italian regions, particularly in the south, offer grants of up to €50,000 to encourage entrepreneurs and families to move to small towns facing depopulation. In exchange, recipients commit to starting a business or investing locally.

Italy also offers tax reductions for new residents under special schemes.


5. Greece 🇬🇷

Incentive: Tax breaks for foreign entrepreneurs

Greece offers a 50% income tax reduction for certain new residents who relocate and invest or work in the country. With a growing tech and tourism sector, it is becoming increasingly attractive for startups.

Lower property prices and improving infrastructure add to its appeal.

6. Chile 🇨🇱

Incentive: Government-funded startup capital

Chile’s “Start-Up Chile” programme is one of the most famous government-backed initiatives globally. It offers equity-free funding, visas and mentoring to international entrepreneurs who relocate and build their startups in the country.

The aim is to position Chile as Latin America’s innovation hub.



7. Canada 🇨🇦

Incentive: Startup Visa Programme

Canada offers permanent residency through its Startup Visa programme if entrepreneurs secure backing from a designated investor group. Some provinces also provide grants and business incentives to encourage settlement in less populated areas.

With strong infrastructure and access to the US market, Canada remains highly attractive for founders.

8. United Arab Emirates 🇦🇪

Incentive: Long-term residency and tax advantages

The UAE offers long-term “Golden Visas” for entrepreneurs and investors. While it may not hand out direct cash grants, the absence of personal income tax and strong government support for startups makes it financially attractive.

Dubai and Abu Dhabi continue to expand business-friendly policies to attract global talent.

Why Are Countries Offering Incentives?

Many nations are facing:

Declining birth rates

Ageing populations

Economic stagnation in rural areas

Brain drain to larger economics

By offering financial support or tax advantages, governments aim to stimulate economic growth, create jobs and revitalise local communities. 

Is It Really “Free Money

Not exactly.

Most schemes require:

A viable business plan

Minimum investment thresholds

Job creation commitments

Proof of financial stability

However, for entrepreneurs willing to relocate, these programmes can significantly reduce startup risk and offer a pathway to residency or even citizenship.

Final Thoughts

For ambitious founders — particularly those feeling squeezed by rising costs in the UK or other major economies — relocating abroad could offer not only financial incentives but a better lifestyle and long-term opportunity.

As global competition for talent intensifies, countries are increasingly willing to invest in people who are ready to invest in them.

Attached is a news article regarding 8 countries that will pay you money to live and start a business 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-15197557/countries-paying-people-including-destination-offering-72-000.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Ratcliffe’s Migration Remarks Spark Debate Over Culture, Work and Responsibility

Comments attributed to billionaire businessman Sir Jim Ratcliffe about migration and cultural change in England have ignited a fierce debate about identity, work ethic and economic responsibility — particularly given his own financial arrangements and growing influence at Manchester United.

Ratcliffe, one of Britain’s richest men and now a key figure at Manchester United, has previously spoken about concerns surrounding immigration and the cultural direction of the UK. Critics argue that framing England as being “colonised” by different cultures risks fuelling division and resentment at a time when immigration remains one of the country’s most politically sensitive issues.

The debate becomes more complex when questions of labour and economic contribution are raised. Migrant workers make up a significant portion of the UK workforce in sectors often described as “low-paid” or “low-skilled” — including care, hospitality, agriculture and logistics. Many economists point out that these industries have long struggled with recruitment shortages among domestically born workers, particularly since Brexit reshaped the labour market.

Some commentators argue that the narrative suggesting migrants are displacing British workers overlooks structural challenges: stagnant wages, rising living costs and changing expectations around job security and working conditions. Others counter that immigration levels should be better managed to protect domestic opportunity.

Ratcliffe’s own financial affairs have also drawn scrutiny. The INEOS founder relocated to Monaco in 2020, a move widely reported to result in substantial tax savings compared to remaining UK-based. While such arrangements are legal, critics argue that wealthy individuals benefiting from Britain’s economic system should contribute proportionately to its public finances — particularly when engaging in national debates about social cohesion and economic contribution.

This perceived contradiction — criticising cultural and economic shifts while legally minimising UK tax liabilities — has not gone unnoticed among political observers.

The conversation has also spilled into football. As a major shareholder and decision-maker at Manchester United, Ratcliffe oversees one of the most culturally diverse institutions in Britain. Modern football is built on international talent: players from across Europe, Africa, South America and beyond compete in the Premier League, contributing billions to the UK economy and enhancing its global influence.

Football authorities have long maintained a zero-tolerance stance on racism and discrimination. Campaigns such as “Kick It Out” and Premier League anti-racism initiatives stress that prejudice has no place in the sport. The global nature of football is often cited as a model of multicultural cooperation, where performance and teamwork outweigh nationality or background.

Critics argue that rhetoric perceived as culturally divisive sits uneasily with leadership in such a diverse sporting environment. Supporters, however, contend that debating immigration policy does not equate to racial prejudice, and that legitimate political discussion should not be conflated with discrimination.

The wider issue highlights a recurring tension in Britain: how to balance national identity, economic competitiveness and social cohesion in a globalised era. It also raises broader questions about consistency — whether those shaping public discourse should align their economic choices with the values they promote.

As debates around migration, taxation and cultural identity continue, the challenge for leaders in business and sport alike is clear: to engage responsibly, avoid inflammatory language, and ensure that inclusion — particularly in football — remains non-negotiable.

Attached is a news article regarding ratcliffe comments over migrant status in the uk 

https://news.sky.com/story/the-uk-has-been-colonised-by-immigrants-says-ineos-boss-and-man-utd-co-owner-sir-jim-ratcliffe-13506333

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Wednesday, 11 February 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Putin Expels Rothschild Family from Russia: What It Means for Moscow and the West

Russian President Vladimir Putin has reportedly moved to expel members of the Rothschild family and associated financial interests from Russia, in a development that is already fuelling geopolitical speculation and renewed debate over foreign influence in the country’s economy.

While details remain limited, the decision is being interpreted by analysts as part of the Kremlin’s broader effort to reduce Western financial presence inside Russia, particularly amid ongoing tensions with Europe and the United States.

Who Are the Rothschilds

The Rothschild family is one of Europe’s oldest and most prominent banking dynasties, with roots dating back to the 18th century. Over generations, the family built a vast financial network spanning London, Paris, Vienna, Frankfurt and Naples. Today, Rothschild & Co operates as a global financial advisory and asset management firm.

Although the modern Rothschild banking group is far removed from the myths and conspiracy theories that often surround the name, it remains symbolically associated with Western finance and elite banking circles.

The Kremlin’s Broader Strategy

If confirmed, the expulsion would align with Russia’s long-standing push for financial sovereignty. Since the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and especially following the Ukraine conflict escalation in 2022, Russia has steadily reduced its reliance on Western banks, investors and financial institutions.

The Kremlin has:

Shifted trade toward China, India and Middle Eastern partners

Increased gold reserves

Promoted the use of the rouble and alternative payment systems

Restricted foreign ownership in key sectors

Removing high-profile Western financial entities would send a strong political message that Moscow intends to operate outside traditional Western financial networks.

Political Signal or Economic Reality

Some experts suggest that the move may be more symbolic than economically disruptive. Western financial firms have already scaled back operations in Russia due to sanctions, regulatory restrictions and reputational risk. As a result, direct Rothschild-linked financial activity in Russia may have already been minimal.

However, symbolism matters. The Rothschild name carries historical weight, particularly in narratives around global finance. Expelling them could be framed domestically as part of a broader effort to protect Russian sovereignty and reduce foreign leverage.

International Reaction

Western governments have yet to formally respond. However, relations between Moscow and major European capitals remain strained. Any move perceived as targeting a well-known Western financial family could deepen diplomatic tensions.

Financial markets will be watching closely to see whether the expulsion signals further restrictions on foreign capital, or if it is an isolated political gesture.

The Bigger Picture

For President Putin, the decision fits within a long-running narrative of resisting Western influence and reshaping Russia’s global economic alliances. Whether this step has meaningful economic consequences or serves primarily as a political statement will depend on how it is implemented and whether similar actions follow.

As global power dynamics continue to shift, Russia’s financial decoupling from the West appears to be accelerating — and this latest development may be another chapter in that broader realignment.

Attached is a news article regarding Putin who expels the Rothschild family from Russia 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-23/rothschild-s-wealth-unit-will-not-accept-new-russian-clients

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36







Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Afghan Migrant Who Attacked Woman in London Dies in Prison

An Afghan national serving time in a London prison has died in custody, prompting an investigation by prison watchdogs into the circumstances of his death.

Death Behind Bars

Gulwali Stanekzay, 25, was found dead in his cell at HMP Wandsworth, a Category B men’s prison in south-west London, on 17 January 2026, while serving a three-year sentence for a brutal and unprovoked assault on a woman in north-west London. The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman has begun probing the incident to establish how and why he died.  

The Crime: Random Assault in Harlesden

The offence occurred on the evening of 26 February 2023, when Stanekzay approached 23-year-old Aisha Waris as she walked home along Minet Avenue in Harlesden, north-west London. CCTV footage showed him deliberately cycling into her, then repeatedly punching her about the head and shoulders for about a minute. The victim was left covered in blood and requiring hospital treatment for her injuries.  

In the ensuing chaos, the assailant returned to the scene and continued the assault, reportedly striking the victim again at a neighbour’s property before turning his aggression on nearby property, causing significant damage.  

Stanekzay pleaded guilty in May 2023 to two counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and two counts of criminal damage. At sentencing, the judge described the attack as “wholly unprovoked” and emphasised the frightening nature of the footage capturing the assault.  

Background and Context

Stanekzay arrived in the UK from Afghanistan as an unaccompanied minor in 2016 and was reported to have experienced periods of homelessness prior to the offence. At the time of the attack, he had spent time in immigration centres and had been detained under immigration powers on several occasions.  

HMP Wandsworth, where he died, is one of the largest prisons in the UK, holding adult male prisoners, and has previously been the subject of operational scrutiny.  

Prison Death Investigations

The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman (PPO) is independently examining the circumstances surrounding Stanekzay’s death. The PPO’s investigations typically aim to determine whether there were any issues in care, health support, safety procedures, or security that contributed to a death in custody. Full findings will only be available once the inquiry concludes and is published.  

Reactions and Wider Debate

Incidents involving migrants and asylum seekers committing violent crimes often feature in public and political debate about immigration policy and community safety. Experts caution against drawing broad conclusions from individual cases, emphasising that crime statistics are complex and influenced by many factors beyond nationality or immigration status.  

Attached is a news article regarding Afghanistan migrant found dead in uk jail 

https://uknip.co.uk/news/uk/breaking/afghan-migrant-who-brutally-attacked-woman-dies-in-prison/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Poland Steps Up Deportations of Foreign Nationals After Breaches of Law — Including Pakistani Citizens

Poland’s border guards and immigration authorities have intensified removal operations against foreign nationals found to be in violation of Polish law, part of a broader government crackdown on illegal migration and breaches of conduct rules.  

Recent Deportations of Pakistani Nationals

In early February 2026, the Polish Border Guard carried out an officially announced deportation operation that saw 25 Pakistani citizens removed from Poland after being found to have breached legal rules during their stay in the country. Government officials described the action as the latest in a series of enforcement measures aimed at those who fail to comply with Polish law.  

Interior and Administration Minister Marcin KierwiÅ„ski highlighted that such deportations are part of a wider policy of “zero tolerance” for legal violations by non-citizens, noting that close to 900 foreign nationals were deported by air on enforcement orders in 2025 alone — though this total encompassed multiple nationalities and cases, not solely Pakistani citizens.  

The individuals removed were flown out of Poland through a coordinated operation involving the Polish Border Guard and military aviation units. Prior to deportation, administrative return orders had been issued and carried out after compulsory enforcement measures were applied.  

Broader Enforcement Context

Poland has been tightening immigration enforcement and deportation efforts in recent years as part of a policy shift designed to reinforce border control, discourage illegal entry and overstays, and uphold public order. In 2025 authorities were reported to have carried out hundreds of deportations of foreign nationals — including those deemed security risks or in breach of immigration rules — both independently and in cooperation with European Union agencies.  

Pakistani nationals have featured in broader border enforcement data, including at the Poland–Belarus frontier, where officials have intercepted significant numbers of would-be migrants attempting irregular crossings — illustrating the ongoing pressure along external EU borders and the challenges of managing migration flows.  

Local and International Reactions

Authorities in Warsaw maintain that rigorous enforcement of immigration and public order rules — including deportations for legal violations — is consistent with national interests and security priorities. However, such operations often attract scrutiny from human rights groups and legal advocates, particularly when concerns arise over due process, access to asylum procedures, and compliance with international protections for people fleeing persecution.

For example, debates have at times emerged over the handling of returns where asylum claims may not have been fully processed or evaluated. These discussions reflect broader tensions across Europe over migration policy, border management, and compliance with both national and international law. (Note: reporting available on related procedural and human rights discussions but not directly linked to the specific recent Pakistani deportations.)  

What’s Not Confirmed

While broader migration reports sometimes cite large cumulative numbers of deportations of Pakistani nationals from multiple countries globally, including Gulf nations, there is no verified reporting confirming that Poland has deported exactly 4,800 Pakistani nationals in a single operation or as a single category. Figures reported by Pakistan’s National Assembly and other sources referring to tens of thousands of deportations relate to multiple host countries and contexts, not exclusively to Poland.  

Attached is a news article regarding deportations of Pakistan nationals from Poland 

https://www.thenews.pk/print/1393130-pakistani-migrants-among-top-seven-nationalities-detained-at-poland-belarus-border

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

School Shooting in Canada Leaves Community in Shock as Investigation Intensifies

A school shooting in Canada has left a community reeling, prompting renewed debate about school safety, youth violence, and gun control across the country.

Emergency services were called to the secondary school shortly after reports of gunfire during school hours. Students and staff were placed into immediate lockdown as police units, ambulances, and tactical response teams surrounded the building. Authorities confirmed that multiple individuals were injured, and fatalities have been reported. The exact number of victims has not yet been officially released, pending notification of families.

Witnesses described scenes of confusion and fear as alarms sounded and teachers quickly ushered students into classrooms, barricading doors and following active threat protocols. Some students reportedly hid under desks or inside storage areas while waiting for police to secure the premises. Parents gathered outside police cordons, desperate for information about their children as officers worked to clear the building room by room.

Law enforcement officials confirmed that a suspect was taken into custody. Police have not yet disclosed a motive but stated that the individual is believed to have acted alone. Investigators are examining the suspect’s background, including social media activity and any potential warning signs that may have preceded the attack. Authorities have urged the public not to speculate while the investigation remains ongoing.

The Prime Minister and provincial leaders expressed condolences to the victims and their families, calling the incident a “devastating tragedy.” Flags at government buildings have been lowered to half-mast in honour of those affected. Crisis counselling services have been made available to students, staff, and families as the community begins the difficult process of healing.

Canada has historically maintained lower rates of gun violence compared to its southern neighbour, largely due to stricter firearm regulations. However, this incident has reignited discussions about access to weapons, mental health support for young people, and the effectiveness of existing school security measures. Advocacy groups on both sides of the gun control debate are calling for urgent action.

School officials announced that the campus will remain closed for several days while investigators continue their work and safety assessments are conducted. A vigil is being planned to honour the victims and provide a space for collective mourning.

As details continue to emerge, the focus remains on supporting those directly impacted and understanding how such a tragedy could occur in a setting meant to be safe for learning. The incident stands as a stark reminder of the profound consequences of violence within educational spaces and the importance of preventative measures moving forward.

Attached is a news article regarding ten killed and 25 injured in Canada school shooting 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cr5lnzqdr5pt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Prince William Embarks on Key Diplomatic Mission to Saudi Arabia

In a major diplomatic move, Britain’s Prince William, Prince of Wales, arrived in Saudi Arabia on February 9, 2026, for his first official state visit to the Kingdom. The three-day trip, conducted at the request of the UK government, is intended to deepen political, economic and cultural ties between the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia — two nations with nearly a century of diplomatic relations.  

The visit follows a 2025 trade mission by the UK’s finance minister, which London said unlocked £6.4 billion ($8.7 billion) in trade and investments — illustrating strong commercial momentum between both countries.  

Meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman

A cornerstone of William’s trip was his meeting with Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman (MBS). Shortly after arriving in Riyadh, William was welcomed by MBS and together they toured At-Turaif, a UNESCO World Heritage Site in Diriyah, the historic birthplace of the Saudi state.  

The crown prince personally guided William through Salwa Palace and the At-Turaif district, discussing traditional Najdi architecture and heritage — symbolic of a shared commitment to preserving cultural history while forging modern ties. A commemorative photo at Salwa Palace marked the significance of their collaboration.  

That evening, the two royals shared a private dinner, reportedly featuring local cuisine and informal conversations designed to foster trust and discuss bilateral priorities quietly and respectfully — aligning with diplomatic protocol and William’s constitutional role.  

In a gesture of sporting camaraderie, William also presented MBS with an England football shirt signed by captain Harry Kane, underscoring the soft power dimension of their engagement.  

Cultural and Social Engagements in Riyadh

Beyond high-level talks, William’s itinerary was packed with public engagements showcasing social and cultural transformation within Saudi Arabia:

Sports and youth outreach: William visited a Riyadh “Sports Boulevard” project — an urban regeneration initiative aligned with Saudi Vision 2030 aimed at boosting green spaces and quality of life — where he engaged with local residents and discussed women’s changing roles in society.  

Female football and gaming events: On the second day of his visit, the prince trained with female footballers, played video games with local youths at an e-sports tournament, and met visitors at a café — signalling support for women’s participation in sports and digital culture.  

These engagements helped highlight both countries’ efforts to improve cultural exchange and promote diversity, opportunity and youth empowerment.


Environmental and Heritage Initiatives in AlUla

On the final day of his trip, William traveled to AlUla, an ancient oasis city designated for heritage conservation and sustainable tourism. There, he:

Visited wildlife reserves to learn about conservation efforts for species such as Arabian oryx and Arabian leopards.

Observed environmental restoration projects, aligning with his long-standing support for global environmental causes through initiatives like the Earthshot Prize.

Explored the newly opened “Prince of Wales House”, a cultural space promoting UK-Saudi cooperation in arts, education and heritage.  

These activities underscored shared environmental priorities and highlighted how heritage protection can dovetail with economic development. 

Diplomatic Context and Broader Significance

The visit comes at a time of shifting global alliances and heightened strategic competition. Saudi Arabia remains a key partner for the UK in areas including trade, energy, defence and regional diplomacy — even as controversies, such as concerns over human rights and past incidents like the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, continue to loom in public discourse. 

William’s official role — representing the UK government rather than engaging in partisan politics — means sensitive topics are addressed privately and constructively, consistent with diplomatic norms.  

Observers see the tour as both a continuation of historic UK-Saudi ties and a strategic effort to expand cultural, economic, and environmental cooperation in the decades ahead. 

Conclusion

Prince William’s 2026 Saudi Arabia visit was more than ceremonial: it showcased a multi-faceted diplomatic mission — balancing heritage tours, cultural engagements, and strategic discussions with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. From Diriyah’s ancient palaces to AlUla’s desert landscapes, the trip highlighted both nations’ ambitions for sustainable progress and deeper cooperation on the world stage.  

Attached is a news article regarding prince William and prince Mohammed bin Salman 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62dg5egr7lo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Irish Armed Groups Issue Threats Against Foreigners, Sparking National Security Concerns

Irish authorities are investigating a series of alarming online statements and videos in which self-styled armed groups claim to have “declared war” on foreigners living in Ireland, using weapons as a tactical threat to intimidate communities and the state.

The material, circulating on encrypted messaging apps and fringe social media platforms, shows masked individuals making anti-immigrant statements while displaying firearms or weapon replicas. While it remains unclear how organised or capable these groups truly are, security experts warn that the rhetoric alone poses a serious risk, particularly in a climate of rising social tension and misinformation.

Gardaí and intelligence services have stressed that Ireland does not face an insurgency, but they acknowledge that extremist language combined with the display of weapons is a significant escalation from protest to potential criminal terrorism. Officials are treating the threats as credible enough to warrant active monitoring and possible arrests under Ireland’s terrorism and firearms legislation.

“These are not freedom fighters or patriots,” one security source said. “They are individuals attempting to use fear, symbolism and violence to gain attention and provoke unrest.”

Ireland has seen an increase in far-right agitation in recent years, often driven by false claims about migration, housing shortages and government policy. Analysts note that many such groups exaggerate their strength online, using military-style language and imagery to project power they do not actually possess. However, lone-actor violence remains a serious concern, particularly when inflammatory messaging targets specific communities.

Community leaders and migrant advocacy organisations have condemned the threats, warning that such rhetoric risks inciting real-world attacks and further polarising Irish society. “This kind of language dehumanises people and puts lives at risk,” one spokesperson said. “Ireland has a long history of rejecting sectarian violence, and this must be no different.”

The Irish government has reaffirmed that any attempt to intimidate or harm people based on nationality or ethnicity will be met with the full force of the law. Under Irish legislation, possession of illegal firearms, public threats of violence, and involvement in terrorist-style organisations carry severe prison sentences.

Authorities are urging the public not to share extremist content and to report any credible threats directly to Gardaí. “These groups rely on attention,” officials said. “Starving them of publicity while enforcing the law is the most effective response.”

As investigations continue, Ireland faces a familiar challenge seen across Europe: confronting radicalisation early, protecting vulnerable communities, and ensuring that violent extremism—no matter how loudly it shouts online—never gains a foothold in reality.

Attached is a news article regarding Irish patriots declaring war on foreigners using weapons as a threat 

https://www.facebook.com/dailymirror/posts/armed-and-masked-men-standing-in-front-of-an-irish-flag-issued-threats-to-politi/1303880938453654/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Hidden Dangers of Processed Food: How It Impacts Your Heart

Processed food has become a staple in modern diets. From ready meals and packaged snacks to processed meats and sugary cereals, convenience often comes at a cost. Health experts have long warned that diets high in processed foods significantly increase the risk of heart disease — the leading cause of death worldwide.

But how exactly does processed food affect the heart? And how long can someone eat this way before facing serious consequences like a heart attack. 

What Is Processed Food. 

Processed food refers to items that have been altered from their natural state for safety, convenience, or longer shelf life. This includes:

Processed meats (sausages, bacon, ham)

Sugary drinks and snacks

Instant noodles and ready meals

Fast food

Packaged baked goods

Chips and crisps

Many of these foods are high in salt, sugar, unhealthy fats, and artificial additives — all of which can damage cardiovascular health over time.

How Processed Food Harms the Heart

1. High Salt Content (Sodium)

Too much salt raises blood pressure. High blood pressure forces the heart to work harder and damages arteries, increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke.

2. Unhealthy Fats

Many processed foods contain trans fats and high levels of saturated fat. These fats raise “bad” LDL cholesterol, which builds up in arteries and can lead to blockages.

3. Added Sugars

Excess sugar contributes to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and inflammation — all major risk factors for heart disease.

4. Low Nutritional Value

Processed foods often lack fibre, vitamins, and essential nutrients that protect heart health.

Over time, these factors contribute to atherosclerosis — a narrowing and hardening of the arteries — which is the main cause of heart attacks.

How Long Before a Heart Attack

There is no fixed timeline for how long someone can eat processed food before suffering a heart attack. The risk depends on several factors:

Genetics

Age

Physical activity levels

Smoking or alcohol use

Overall diet balance

Existing health conditions (like high blood pressure or diabetes)

For some people, years or even decades of unhealthy eating gradually increase risk. For others with genetic vulnerabilities or multiple risk factors, damage can happen more quickly.

Research shows that regularly consuming high amounts of ultra-processed foods is associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, heart attacks are usually the result of long-term damage rather than short-term eating habits.

In simple terms: the longer and more frequently processed foods dominate your diet, the higher your risk becomes. 

Can the Damage Be Reversed

The good news is that the heart is resilient. Lifestyle changes can significantly reduce risk:

Switching to a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and healthy fats

Reducing salt and sugar intake

Exercising regularly

Maintaining a healthy weight

Quitting smoking

Studies show that improving diet can lower blood pressure and cholesterol within weeks to months. Long-term heart attack risk can decrease substantially over time with consistent healthy habits.

The Bottom Line

Eating processed food occasionally is unlikely to cause immediate harm. The real danger lies in making ultra-processed foods a daily dietary foundation.

Heart disease develops quietly over years. While there is no countdown clock to a heart attack, consistently poor eating habits dramatically raise the odds.

Moderation, balance, and awareness are key. Protecting your heart starts with what you put on your plate every day.

Attached is a news article regarding Biden danger of process food that can impact a heart attack 

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/ultraprocessed-foods-cardiovascular-disease-risk-b2915601.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Tuesday, 10 February 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

British Woman Shot Dead by Father in Texas After Argument About Donald Trump

A 23-year-old British woman was fatally shot by her father at his home in Texas last year after the pair argued about U.S. politics, an inquest has heard.

Lucy Harrison, a fashion buyer from Warrington in Cheshire, was staying with her father, Kris Harrison, and his family at their suburban home in Prosper, Texas, a town near Dallas, when she died on January 10, 2025 — the day she and her boyfriend were due to fly home to the United Kingdom.  

A Heated Argument Before the Fatal Incident

The inquest at Cheshire Coroner’s Court was told that tension between Ms Harrison and her father had built over the course of the visit, particularly over his news-driven discussions and ownership of firearms.  

On the morning of her death, Ms Harrison and her father became embroiled in a “big” argument that included debate over U.S. President Donald Trump, who was preparing to begin a second presidential term. According to evidence from her boyfriend, Sam Littler, the dispute was intense and led to Ms Harrison becoming upset and running upstairs.  

During the exchange, Ms Harrison reportedly challenged her father with a hypothetical question about how he would feel if she were sexually assaulted — to which he allegedly replied that he had other daughters and it “would not upset him that much,” the court heard.  

The Shooting

About half an hour before Ms Harrison and Mr Littler were due to leave for the airport, her father took her by the hand and led her into his ground-floor bedroom, the boyfriend testified. Approximately 15 seconds later, a loud bang was heard. When Mr Littler and Ms Harrison’s stepmother arrived, Ms Harrison was found on the floor near the bathroom entrance with a single gunshot wound to the chest.  

Mr Harrison was screaming and called for his wife. Emergency services were contacted, but Ms Harrison was pronounced dead at the scene.  

Background and Inquest Proceedings

The inquest heard that Mr Harrison had a past history of alcohol addiction and had previously attended rehab. He did not attend the inquest in person; his legal representative described the proceedings as more akin to a criminal investigation than a fact-finding hearing.  

According to his statement read in court, Mr Harrison said he had been watching a news segment on gun crime with his daughter and offered to show her his handgun — a Glock 9mm he kept in a bedside cabinet. He claimed he did not understand what happened and did not recall whether his finger was on the trigger when the weapon discharged.  

Despite the circumstances, a Collin County grand jury in Texas declined to indict him on any criminal charges, concluding there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.  

Remembering Lucy Harrison

Ms Harrison’s mother, Jane Coates, described her daughter as a “real force of life” who cared deeply about social issues and was unafraid to engage in passionate debate. She worked as a fashion buyer for a major brand and had a close circle of family and friends both in the UK and abroad.  

The inquest into her death is expected to conclude with the coroner’s formal findings later this week.

Attached is a news article regarding British women called Lucy Harrison shot by her father in Texas 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyk917xy8no

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Eight Countries That Will Pay You to Move There and Start a Business With rising living cost...