Friday, 13 February 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

President Revokes Landmark Greenhouse Gas Rules in Sweeping Policy Shift

In a move that is already sending shockwaves through global climate politics, the President has revoked a landmark set of greenhouse gas regulations, marking one of the most significant environmental policy reversals in recent years.

The decision rolls back rules that had placed strict limits on carbon dioxide and methane emissions from power plants, manufacturing industries and vehicle fleets. The regulations were originally introduced under the framework of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) following a Supreme Court ruling that classified greenhouse gases as pollutants under the Clean Air Act.

What Has Been Revoked?

The now-cancelled measures required:

Power plants to cut carbon emissions by transitioning toward renewable energy sources

Automakers to meet tighter fuel efficiency standards

Oil and gas companies to monitor and limit methane leaks

States to submit climate compliance strategies

Supporters of the original rules argued they were central to meeting commitments under the Paris Agreement, the global pact aimed at limiting global temperature rises to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

The President’s Justification

The administration described the rollback as a move to “restore economic freedom” and reduce regulatory burdens on American businesses. Officials claim the regulations were driving up energy costs for consumers and stifling domestic energy production.

In a televised address, the President said the decision would “unleash American energy” and protect manufacturing jobs, particularly in coal, oil and natural gas sectors.

Political Fallout

Environmental groups have reacted furiously. Organizations such as Greenpeace and the Sierra Club condemned the move as “reckless” and “dangerous,” warning it could accelerate climate change and damage public health.

Democratic lawmakers are expected to challenge the revocation in court, arguing that the EPA remains legally obligated to regulate greenhouse gases under Supreme Court precedent.

Republican leaders, meanwhile, have praised the move as long overdue, saying it restores balance between environmental protection and economic growth.

Economic and Global Implications

Energy markets reacted swiftly, with fossil fuel stocks rising in early trading. Analysts suggest the rollback could boost short-term domestic production but risk long-term investment uncertainty in the clean energy sector.

Internationally, the decision may strain diplomatic ties with climate-focused allies in Europe and Asia. Critics argue that stepping back from emission limits could weaken U.S. leadership in global climate negotiations.

What Happens Next?

Legal challenges are almost certain, and the final outcome may depend on federal court rulings in the months ahead. States such as California and New York are expected to maintain their own stricter emission standards, potentially creating a patchwork regulatory environment across the country.

The revocation represents more than just a policy shift — it signals a broader ideological battle over how the United States balances environmental responsibility with economic priorities. Whether the move proves economically beneficial or environmentally costly remains to be seen, but its political impact is already undeniable.

Attached is a news article regarding trump admin revokes greenhouse gases 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn0zdd7yl4vo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Administration Ends Major ICE Enforcement Operation in Minnesota

In a dramatic shift, the Trump administration has announced the end of “Operation Metro Surge,” a large-scale immigration enforcement campaign in Minnesota that drew national attention, widespread protests and fierce political backlash. The announcement came on Thursday, February 12, 2026, when White House border czar Tom Homan confirmed that the immigration crackdown would wind down after weeks of controversy and unrest.  

What the Operation Was

Launched in December 2025, Operation Metro Surge represented what the Department of Homeland Security described as the “largest immigration enforcement operation ever” in the state, centered on the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul. At its peak, thousands of federal agents – including personnel from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection, and Border Patrol – were deployed to conduct aggressive sweeps aimed at identifying and arresting undocumented immigrants.  

Officials hailed the crackdown as a necessary campaign against crime and undocumented immigration, with more than 4,000 arrests reported as part of the effort.   However, critics argued that the measures went far beyond targeting criminals and instead terrorized broader immigrant communities.

Fatal Shootings and Rising Tensions

The enforcement sweep rapidly became highly controversial after two Minneapolis residents – Renee Good and Alex Pretti, both U.S. citizens – were killed during confrontations with federal agents. The deaths sparked outrage from local communities, civil rights groups, and political leaders across the country, who condemned the use of lethal force and accused ICE of overreach.  

In response to the brutal footage and rising public anger, mass demonstrations erupted throughout Minnesota, with thousands of protesters calling for the withdrawal of ICE agents and demanding protections for immigrant families.  

Political Backlash and Legal Pressure

Beyond the streets, the operation faced legal challenges and political scrutiny. Minnesota officials, including Governor Tim Walz, criticized the federal deployment as disruptive and harmful to businesses, schools, and social cohesion. Federal lawsuits and judge rulings also highlighted civil liberties concerns, including findings that detainees were denied adequate access to legal counsel.  

Lawmakers from both parties raised questions about the administration’s strategy, and opinion polls showed significant public skepticism toward such expansive enforcement tactics.  

Decision to End the Operation

At a press conference announcing the conclusion of the crackdown, Tom Homan said he had proposed ending the surge and President Trump concurred. He framed the decision as a success that had made communities safer and reduced Minnesota’s status as what federal officials labelled a “sanctuary state” for criminals. The withdrawal, he explained, would be gradual over the coming week, with agents returning to normal duties or being reassigned elsewhere.  

Despite ending the broader operation, Homan and the White House stressed that immigration enforcement would continue in Minnesota and across the U.S. through targeted actions prioritizing public safety threats.  

Reactions from Minnesota Leaders

Reactions among Minnesota officials were mixed. While some local leaders welcomed the drawdown as a necessary step toward restoring normalcy, others remained deeply critical of the federal campaign’s long-lasting effects.

Governor Tim Walz said the state would begin recovery efforts, noting that the operation left behind economic and emotional scars.  

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey publicly celebrated the federal withdrawal, framing it as a victory for community resilience.  

Civil rights advocates continue to call for accountability regarding the shootings and alleged civil liberties violations during the enforcement.  

What Comes Next

While the conclusion of Operation Metro Surge marks a major retreat from one of the most aggressive immigration enforcement campaigns in years, it does not signal an end to ICE activity nationwide. Federal officials insist that routine immigration enforcement will persist and that lessons from Minnesota will shape future operations.  

The decision, however, underscores the political and social limits of expansive federal enforcement when met with sustained local resistance and tragic outcomes. It also highlights the growing national debate over immigration policy, enforcement priorities, and the use of federal authority in local communities.

Attached is a news article regarding ICE ending operations in Minnesota 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2lr9w29zwyo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

glittering world of Saudi Arabian weddings, grandeur has long been part of the tradition. But a growing trend among affluent families is turning heads even in a country known for lavish celebrations: Saudi brides gifting gold bars to guests.

Across cities such as Riyadh and Jeddah, weddings are evolving into multi-day spectacles where luxury is not just displayed — it is shared. Instead of traditional wedding favours such as perfumes, prayer beads or ornate sweets, some brides are now presenting invited guests with small, engraved gold bars as keepsakes.

A Symbol of Wealth and Blessing

Gold holds deep cultural and economic significance in Saudi society. It is not merely decorative — it represents stability, security and family honour. Bridal jewellery sets, often purchased from luxury retailers such as L’azurde, can weigh heavily in both carats and cost.

By gifting gold bars, families are blending tradition with modern extravagance. The bars — typically ranging from 5g to 20g — are often custom-engraved with the couple’s initials, wedding date, or a Quranic blessing. Some are even packaged in velvet-lined boxes stamped with 24-carat authenticity seals.

Social Media Fuels the Trend

Platforms such as Instagram and Snapchat have amplified the spectacle. Short clips of guests opening gold boxes at wedding receptions have drawn millions of views, further raising expectations for high-society ceremonies.

In one widely circulated video, a bride in Riyadh unveiled a “gold corner” where guests could collect personalised bullion bars after posing for photographs. Another Jeddah celebration reportedly included gold coins embedded inside luxury chocolate displays.

A Display of Status

Saudi weddings are already known for designer gowns, celebrity performers and five-star hotel ballrooms. Venues such as the Four Seasons Hotel Riyadh frequently host ultra-luxury ceremonies where guest lists can exceed 500 people.

For elite families, gifting gold serves as both generosity and status signalling. With gold prices remaining historically strong, even small bars can represent significant expense. A 10g 24-carat gold bar can cost several hundred pounds depending on global market rates.

Critics, however, argue that the trend reflects increasing social pressure to “outdo” previous weddings. While Islam encourages generosity, some commentators question whether competitive displays risk overshadowing the spiritual significance of marriage.

Tradition Meets Modern Wealth

Saudi Arabia’s economic diversification under Vision 2030 has expanded private wealth, luxury retail and global exposure. Younger couples, influenced by international trends yet rooted in local customs, are reshaping what celebration looks like.

Still, not all weddings follow this path. For many families, meaningful gifts remain symbolic rather than extravagant — dates, oud perfume or handwritten prayers.

Attached is a news article regarding Saudi brides family gift gold bars to guess 

https://www.htsyndication.com/mint/article/-24-carat-gold-biscuit-or-chocolate--%3A-viral-video-from-saudi-wedding-leaves-internet-guessing/97504483

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

King Charles Visits Lancashire to Celebrate Cheese and Community Resilience

King Charles III made a much-anticipated visit to Lancashire on 9 February 2026, underlining his long-standing support for British agriculture and artisan food producers. As part of a full day of engagements across the county, His Majesty took time to sample locally made cheese and officially open a new state-of-the-art cheesemaking site — a visit welcomed enthusiastically by local communities and producers alike.  

The highlight of the royal visit was at Butlers Farmhouse Cheeses, a fourth-generation family cheesemaker based near Preston, where the King was on hand to mark the opening of the company’s new “cheese campus.” This cutting-edge facility brings together every stage of cheese production — from milk to maturation and packing — in one location following the devastating fire that destroyed the firm’s previous site in late 2023.  

A Royal Taste Test with a Lancashire Classic

During his tour, King Charles met members of the Butler family, staff and local suppliers who helped rebuild the business. He also took the opportunity to sample Blacksticks Blue, one of Lancashire’s signature cheeses, paired inventively with blackcurrant jam on a ginger biscuit. The King described the combination as “perfect for dessert,” delighting the crowd and reinforcing his reputation as a fan of fine British produce.  

His Majesty’s visit concluded with the unveiling of a commemorative plaque to celebrate the completion of the new facility — a symbol not only of family craftsmanship but also of resilience after adversity. “What an exceptional family business,” the King commented, recognising the importance of small, local food producers to the region’s economy and cultural heritage.  

Warm Welcome Across the County

The Lancashire visit wasn’t solely about cheese tasting. King Charles began his day at Clitheroe Station, greeting crowds enthusiastic to catch a glimpse of the monarch and local representatives. Throughout the day he also visited rural venues including an auction mart, where he met farmers and even a Fell pony connected to the late Queen’s favourite mount.  

Despite a brief moment of heckling from a member of the public about unrelated politics, the overall tone of King Charles’s meetings with communities was positive — with many locals expressing pride at the royal attention on Lancashire’s farmers, producers and rural way of life.  

Highlighting Lancashire’s Cheese Heritage

Lancashire holds a special place in British cheese culture: the county is one of the few in England whose name is linked to multiple distinctive cheese styles — Tasty, Crumbly and Creamy Lancashire — celebrated for their rich flavour and traditional production.  

By spotlighting this heritage during his visit, King Charles not only honoured a centuries-old food craft but also championed the importance of rural communities and small businesses in the UK’s cultural and economic fabric.

Attached is a news article regarding King Charles visit to Lancashire to test cheese 

https://www.lancs.live/news/lancashire-news/king-charles-open-cheese-campus-33379716.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Mass Protests Across America Against President Trump

Across the United States, large numbers of Americans have taken to the streets to protest against President Donald Trump’s policies and actions, marking one of the most sustained periods of civil unrest in recent U.S. history.

In cities from New York to Minneapolis, Los Angeles to Washington D.C., demonstrators have repeatedly assembled in public squares, parks, downtown streets, and outside government buildings to voice dissent against a wide array of issues they associate with the Trump administration — from immigration enforcement to concerns over democratic norms and civil liberties.  

What’s Driving the Protests?

The protests are not driven by a single event but by a broad coalition of grievances:

Immigration policy: One of the most visible flashpoints was Operation Metro Surge, a controversial immigration enforcement campaign in Minnesota. After months of protests spark widespread national unrest — including rallies, marches, and sit-ins — the Trump administration recently announced it would end the surge amid intense public criticism and legal challenges following deadly confrontations and allegations of excessive force.  

Concerns about authoritarianism: Organizers of the so-called “No Kings” protests describe their rallies as a rebuke to what they view as an increasingly authoritarian presidency. These demonstrations have seen millions of people march across the U.S. calling for the protection of constitutional rights and a halt to policies they consider undemocratic.  

Coalition movements: Grassroots movements like 50501 — shorthand for “50 protests in 50 states, one movement” — have coordinated nationwide days of action and walkouts, bringing together civil rights groups, students, labour unions, LGBTQ+ advocates and other organisations to voice opposition to Trump’s agenda.  

Scale and Nature of Demonstrations

These protests have unfolded in waves over the last year:

Mass marches and rallies: Organizers report tens of thousands to millions of participants in major nationwide events such as the June 2025 No Kings Day protests, which drew demonstrators to more than 2,000 locations.  

Coordinated walkouts: On the anniversary of Trump’s inauguration in January 2026, activists held a nationwide Free America Walkout with hundreds of actions planned in every U.S. state and several other countries.  

Nationwide mobilisation: In early 2025, the Hands Off! protests saw more than 1,200 demonstrations across all 50 states, with people rallying against government downsizing, cuts to social services, and broader concerns over rights and freedoms.  

Despite the scale, many of the actions have remained largely peaceful, with organisers stressing nonviolent protest and constitutional rights as central themes of their efforts.  

Political and Legal Impact

The protests have intensified political pressure on state and federal officials. Civil liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have been involved in legal challenges related to protest rights after disputes with police over demonstration restrictions.  

Meanwhile, public opinion remains sharply divided. Supporters of President Trump characterise many demonstrations as politically motivated hostility, while opponents view the protests as democratically justified resistance to what they see as an erosion of civil rights.

What This Means for the U.S.

The pace and breadth of these protests reflect deep political polarization in the United States. Unlike isolated rallies of the past, today’s movements show a highly organised and widespread opposition — stretching from major metropolitan centres to remote towns — that mobilises around shared concerns about government policy, civil liberties, and the future direction of the country.

Whether this wave of civil activism will translate into sustained political change, influence public opinion, or reshape electoral outcomes remains a central question as the nation moves deeper into Trump’s second term in office.

Attached is a news article regarding mass protests against Trump in America 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c70622038yxo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


 Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Rise of “Dollar 2.0”: Is Physical Cash Being Replaced by Digital Currency?

Across the globe, conversations about the future of money are intensifying. As digital payments surge and governments explore new monetary technologies, some analysts are calling the next phase of the US currency system “Dollar 2.0” — a term used to describe a potential fully digital version of the United States Dollar.

While physical cash remains legal tender, the shift toward digital transactions is reshaping how money is stored, spent, and even controlled.

What Is “Dollar 2.0”?

“Dollar 2.0” is not an official name but a phrase often used to describe:

A Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) issued by the Federal Reserve

A fully digital version of the US dollar

A programmable form of money operating on secure digital infrastructure

Unlike cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, which are decentralized and operate independently of governments, a digital dollar would be government-backed, just like traditional US currency.

In simple terms, it would be the same dollar — but existing purely in digital form.

Why Move Away From Physical Cash?

There are several reasons policymakers and economists are considering a digital dollar:

1. Decline in Cash Usage

In many developed nations, physical cash usage has steadily declined as contactless cards, mobile banking, and digital wallets dominate retail transactions.

2. Faster Payments

A digital dollar could allow instant settlement between individuals, banks, and businesses without traditional delays.

3. Global Competition

China has already launched trials of its digital yuan via the People’s Bank of China. Some US policymakers worry that without innovation, the dollar could lose influence in global trade.

4. Financial Inclusion

A CBDC could allow unbanked citizens to hold digital dollars without needing a traditional bank account.

How Would Dollar 2.0 Work?

If implemented, the digital dollar would likely:

Be stored in government-approved digital wallets

Be accessible via smartphones or secure ID systems

Operate on regulated blockchain or ledger technology

Be backed 1:1 by the Federal Reserve

However, it would not necessarily eliminate cash immediately. Most experts suggest a long transition period.

The Privacy Debate

The idea of a digital dollar raises serious questions:

Would transactions be monitored?

Could funds be frozen instantly?

Would spending limits be programmable?

Critics argue that a fully digital currency could increase government surveillance. Supporters say proper legislation could ensure privacy protections similar to current banking systems.

The Federal Reserve has repeatedly stated that any digital dollar would require approval from Congress and would prioritize security and privacy.

Impact on Banks and Crypto

A US CBDC could:

Reduce reliance on commercial banks for basic deposits

Compete with private stablecoins

Reshape the cryptocurrency market

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin were originally created as alternatives to government-controlled money. A digital dollar could blur that distinction by combining blockchain efficiency with state backing.

Is Cash Really Disappearing?

Despite digital growth, physical dollars remain widely circulated globally. The US dollar is still the world’s dominant reserve currency and is heavily used in international trade.

The move toward “Dollar 2.0” would not necessarily mean paper money disappears overnight — but it signals a shift in how governments are thinking about the future of finance.

The Bigger Picture

The debate over digital currency reflects a larger transformation in the global economy:

Cashless societies

Digital identity systems

Programmable finance

Central bank modernization

Whether “Dollar 2.0” becomes reality depends on political decisions, public trust, cybersecurity readiness, and economic strategy.

One thing is clear: the definition of money is evolving — and the dollar may be entering its most significant transformation since leaving the gold standard in 1971.

Attached is a News article regarding the dollar 2.0 digital currency 

https://www.piie.com/commentary/op-eds/2026/economic-heavyweights-sound-alarm-over-new-currency-top-economist-fears

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Outrage After Photo of Crown Prince in Jeffrey Epstein Files Sparks Backlash

A photograph reportedly showing Mohammed bin Salman with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has ignited waves of criticism and backlash following the latest release of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein files by the U.S. Department of Justice.

In early February 2026, images and references extracted from the massive trove of documents — which include emails, correspondence and photographs seized during U.S. investigations — emerged online and in international media. Among the material was a framed photograph of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman alongside Epstein displayed in Epstein’s New York mansion, a discovery that has become a focal point of public outrage and intense online debate.  

What the Files Show

The Epstein files, released under a 2025 U.S. law compelling authorities to make millions of pages of material public, contain communications and snapshots of Epstein’s wide network of elite contacts. Included in the documents are photos and emails showing the circle of influential people he interacted with — from political leaders to business figures and royalty.  

One of these photos, reported by international outlets, appears to show Mohammed bin Salman with Epstein. While the Saudi royal court has not issued a detailed public response to the specific image, the mere inclusion of the prince in the files has triggered controversy given Epstein’s conviction for sex trafficking and abuse.  

Backlash and Public Reaction

International media outlets and social commentators have widely circulated the image, prompting a strong reaction on social media platforms. Many critics have seized on the photo as evidence of the Crown Prince’s proximity to Epstein — a figure synonymous with sexual abuse, exploitation, and powerful elites exploiting vulnerable people. Some voices online have gone further, demanding accountability and questioning the nature of any relationship between the two figures.  

There have been reports — though difficult to independently verify — of public expressions of discontent and protest in or around Saudi Arabia tied to the release of the photo and the broader Epstein revelations. Clips shared on social media depict people in parts of the Gulf region tearing down or denouncing images of leaders associated with the scandal, particularly Mohammed bin Salman, as anger mounted over his inclusion in files connected to a convicted sex offender.  

Not all of this reaction has been confirmed by mainstream international news agencies, and due to restrictions on protests and political expression inside the kingdom, large-scale public demonstrations are rarely reported by official sources. Nonetheless, the online uproar underscores a broader public concern, especially among Gulf and global audiences, about elite impunity and justice for Epstein’s victims.  

Saudi Response and International Implications

To date there has been no thorough official response from Saudi authorities directly addressing the photograph, its context, or any allegations of inappropriate contact with Epstein. Historically, the Saudi government has been cautious to publicly engage with negative narratives concerning its leaders, especially when they touch on international controversy.  

Internationally, the image has amplified scrutiny of Saudi Arabia’s leadership and raised fresh questions in diplomatic circles about transparency, accountability, and the relationships between global elites. Critics argue that such revelations risk undermining Riyadh’s efforts to position itself as a modernising force on the world stage — a narrative reinforced through major events and economic reforms.  

What This Means

While the photograph itself does not amount to evidence of criminal wrongdoing by the Crown Prince, its presence in the files has had significant reputational consequences — fuelling debate about the circles Epstein moved in and how the powerful and wealthy became linked to him. Public reaction, both online and in some offline settings, highlights broader frustrations with impunity and the need for accountability in high-profile abuse cases.  

As investigations continue and more of the Epstein files are examined, the controversy over this photo underscores how deeply the scandal has penetrated global politics and public discourse — far beyond the U.S. legal system and into international relations involving prominent figures like Mohammed bin Salman.

There’s **no verified, official confirmation that a picture truly showing Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman with Jeffrey Epstein as released in the Epstein files is genuine, and significant evidence points to ongoing misinformation and doctored images circulating online:

✅ No Trusted Source Has Confirmed It

Major news outlets and reliable fact-checking organisations have not published a verified photo from official Department of Justice releases showing MBS with Epstein. There is no documented source, file number or authenticated DOJ image publicly verified by reputable media that definitively proves the picture is real.  

⚠️ Misinformation Is Widespread

Experts and journalists have noted that the release of the Epstein files has triggered a wave of misinformation, including AI-generated and manipulated images showing Epstein with various prominent figures — not all of which are real.  

Some of the viral images shared online (not just related to MBS but other public figures) have been flagged as AI-generated or doctored, having invisible AI watermarks or inconsistencies typical of artificially created content.  

📌 Conflicting Online Claims

On social media (especially Reddit), there are competing claims: some users say a photo exists in the files, others say it’s unverified or potentially fake, and no independent mainstream source has corroborated it.  

This means even if an image has circulated, that doesn’t mean it’s genuine or from the official DOJ document dump.

🧠 Important Distinction

Even if a picture seems to show two people together, that does not prove wrongdoing or anything criminal — and many such images online are simply part of viral rumours or AI manipulation. Mainstream media are generally cautious and have not confirmed a verified photo of MBS with Epstein.  

In summary:

There is no verified, legitimate photo confirmed by official sources that shows Mohammed bin Salman and Jeffrey Epstein together. Many images circulating online are unverified, possibly AI-generated or manipulated, and should be treated with scepticism until confirmed by trustworthy outlets. If you’d like, I can help you understand how to spot fake images or misinformation, especially in high-profile political controversies.

Attached is a News article regarding a picture of Jeffrey Epstein with Mohammed bin Salman in the Epstein files 

https://reporteri.net/en/NEWS/boat/Photo-of-Epstein-with-Saudi-Arabian-prince-released/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

UK Government’s £1 Billion Investment in Domestic Abuse Support the Right Approach — or Missing Half the Picture?

In December 2025 the UK government announced it would invest over £1 billion into supporting victims of domestic abuse and violence, with a major focus on women and girls under its Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) strategy. This funding — spread across safe accommodation, counselling, court support and specialist services — has been described by ministers as the largest state-backed domestic abuse initiative in British history.  

What Is the Funding Aimed At

The £1 billion-plus package includes:

Nearly £500 million for safe accommodation — funding refuges and housing support for victims and children.  

£550 million dedicated to specialist services, such as counselling, court guidance and victim support.  

Additional targeted resources including increased helplines, housing aid, and community support.  

Government ministers say the strategy will not only support victims but also prevent future abuse and prosecute perpetrators, with an ambition to halve violence against women and girls within a decade.  

The Case for Targeted Support for Women

The government’s Violence Against Women and Girls strategy is based on official crime data showing that women and girls experience certain forms of abuse — notably sexual violence and stalking — at a significantly higher rate than men. For example:

Women are statistically far more likely to be victims of sexual assault.  

Domestic abuse and stalking are also more commonly reported by women than by men.  

Supporters of this gender-focused approach argue that targeted investment reflects the scale and severity of these harms, and that specialist services tailored to women’s needs are essential for recovery and safety.

The Debate: Are All Victims Being Counted

While many public health and safety advocates welcome increased funding, there is an ongoing debate about whether the strategy overlooks men and boys who also experience abuse.

Official figures from the Office for National Statistics show that in England and Wales in the past year, an estimated 3.8 million people experienced domestic abuse — with roughly 2.2 million women and about 1.5 million men affected.  

Some commentators and campaigners argue that, despite significant funding, male victims often lack the same level of tailored, specialist support — such as refuges or gender-specific services — compared to women. Independent advocates and researchers have called for more balanced investment and strategies that recognise abuse can happen to anyone, regardless of gender.  

Is the Funding Being Misreported

There’s no evidence that the government is “lying” about the investment figures — the funds are real, documented and published on official government channels.   However, critics sometimes suggest that headline figures can obscure how money is actually spent on the ground, and whether those allocations reflect the needs of different groups of victims.

For example:

Some argue that the VAWG framework — by definition focused on women and girls — may unintentionally sideline male victims within policies and funding streams designed specifically for women.  

Others contend that men are less likely to report abuse or seek help, which complicates how support services are planned and resourced.  

Is the Strategy Working

It’s too early to definitively say whether the current strategy will halve violence against women and girls within ten years. However, initial figures show thousands more survivors accessing safe accommodation and support services following previous funding boosts.  

Supporters argue that:

Investment is crucial and overdue, given the human and economic cost of abuse.

Specialist services help victims escape dangerous situations and begin rebuilding their lives.

Critics argue that:

A gender-neutral or more inclusive strategy might better reflect the lived experience of all victims of abuse.

Funding and services should be based on harm metrics rather than political framing, ensuring that anyone affected — men, women, non-binary people — gets support.

Conclusion

The UK government’s multi-billion-pound funding package for domestic abuse victims represents a significant policy commitment and reflects a long-awaited investment in support services. But the debate over whether the approach is truly inclusive and fair to all victims — irrespective of gender — continues. To many, the headline figures are real and impactful; to others, they raise questions about whether support and recognition are distributed proportionately based on victimisation rather than gendered categorisation.

Domestic abuse and violence are serious problems that affect millions of people in Britain each year. Regardless of the strategy’s label, comprehensive support for all victims — and effective prevention — remains a national priority.

Attached is a news article regarding online misogyny 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/z87wb7h

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Ghost Parakeet: Britain’s Most Mysterious Urban Bird

In parks, cemeteries and suburban gardens across the UK, flashes of bright green have become a familiar sight. The loud screech of the parakeet is now part of the urban soundtrack in parts of the country. But among birdwatchers and folklore enthusiasts, there is talk of something far rarer — the so-called “Ghost Parakeet.”

The Rise of the Parakeet in Britain

The bird most people see is the Rose-ringed Parakeet — a bright green, long-tailed parrot originally native to parts of Africa and South Asia. Over the past few decades, the species has established large wild populations in cities such as London, particularly around parks like Richmond Park and Hyde Park.

The most common theory is that these birds descend from escaped or released pets during the 1960s and 70s. With milder winters and plentiful food from gardens, they have thrived.

So What Is the “Ghost Parakeet”?

Unlike the vibrant green flocks seen daily, the “Ghost Parakeet” refers to unusually pale, white, or cream-coloured parakeets occasionally spotted among them. These birds are not a separate species but are believed to be rare colour mutations — such as leucistic or albino variations — of the standard rose-ringed parakeet.

Because they are so rare, sightings often generate excitement in local communities. Their pale plumage gives them an almost spectral appearance as they dart through trees at dusk, which is where the nickname “ghost” originates.

Myth vs. Biology

Urban myths have grown around these pale birds. Some claim they are a new invasive species. Others believe they are signs of environmental change. In reality, colour mutations occur naturally in many bird populations.

Leucism, for example, results in partial loss of pigmentation, creating pale feathers but usually retaining normal eye colour. True albinism is rarer and involves a complete lack of melanin, often producing red or pink eyes.

The “ghost” label is more poetic than scientific.

A Symbol of Changing Britain

The presence of parakeets — green or ghostly pale — reflects wider environmental changes. Warmer climates, global trade, and the exotic pet industry have reshaped British wildlife. What once would have been considered an escaped curiosity is now an established urban resident.

Some conservationists raise concerns about competition with native birds like woodpeckers and nuthatches. Others argue the impact has been overstated and that ecosystems naturally adapt.

The Allure of the Rare

For birdwatchers, spotting a Ghost Parakeet is a badge of honour. Social media posts quickly circulate when one is seen. Unlike the now-common green flocks, a pale parakeet remains elusive — appearing suddenly, then vanishing back into the canopy.

Whether seen as an ecological oddity, a genetic fluke, or a mystical urban legend, the Ghost Parakeet captures something uniquely modern: the blending of global wildlife with local folklore.

In a city where skyscrapers rise and nature fights for space, even a pale flash of wings can feel like a haunting reminder that the wild still thrives in unexpected ways.

Attached is a news article regarding the ghost parakeet bird 

https://www.ecoticias.com/en/australias-ghost-bird-has-reappeared-for-decades-it-was-almost-a-myth-and-now-there-is-acoustic-evidence-to-prove-it/26056/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 









Thursday, 12 February 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Eight Countries That Will Pay You to Move There and Start a Business

With rising living costs and growing competition in major economies, some countries are flipping the script — offering financial incentives, grants and residency pathways to attract entrepreneurs willing to relocate and build businesses.

From Europe to Asia, governments facing population decline or seeking economic growth are actively encouraging foreign talent to settle down and invest. Here are eight countries that will effectively “pay” you — through grants, tax incentives or startup funding — to move there and build your future.

1. Ireland 🇮🇪

Incentive: Startup funding and tax benefits

Ireland’s Start-Up Entrepreneur Programme (STEP) offers non-EU entrepreneurs a pathway to residency if they launch an innovative business. Successful applicants can access funding support and benefit from Ireland’s competitive corporate tax rate (12.5%).

The country is particularly attractive for tech, fintech and pharmaceutical startups, with strong access to EU markets.

2. Portugal 🇵🇹

Incentive: Grants and startup visas

Portugal offers a Startup Visa and various regional incentives for entrepreneurs willing to base their business in less populated areas. Some regions provide financial support, tax breaks and even relocation grants.

Lisbon and Porto have become fast-growing startup hubs in Europe, offering lower costs than London or Berlin.

3. Spain 🇪🇸

Incentive: Digital nomad and entrepreneur visas

Spain has introduced entrepreneur-friendly visa schemes and tax incentives for foreign founders. Some rural municipalities also offer relocation grants to attract new residents and business activity.

The lifestyle benefits — climate, healthcare and lower living costs — are often as attractive as the financial perks.

4. Italy 🇮🇹

Incentive: Grants for moving to rural areas

Certain Italian regions, particularly in the south, offer grants of up to €50,000 to encourage entrepreneurs and families to move to small towns facing depopulation. In exchange, recipients commit to starting a business or investing locally.

Italy also offers tax reductions for new residents under special schemes.


5. Greece 🇬🇷

Incentive: Tax breaks for foreign entrepreneurs

Greece offers a 50% income tax reduction for certain new residents who relocate and invest or work in the country. With a growing tech and tourism sector, it is becoming increasingly attractive for startups.

Lower property prices and improving infrastructure add to its appeal.

6. Chile 🇨🇱

Incentive: Government-funded startup capital

Chile’s “Start-Up Chile” programme is one of the most famous government-backed initiatives globally. It offers equity-free funding, visas and mentoring to international entrepreneurs who relocate and build their startups in the country.

The aim is to position Chile as Latin America’s innovation hub.



7. Canada 🇨🇦

Incentive: Startup Visa Programme

Canada offers permanent residency through its Startup Visa programme if entrepreneurs secure backing from a designated investor group. Some provinces also provide grants and business incentives to encourage settlement in less populated areas.

With strong infrastructure and access to the US market, Canada remains highly attractive for founders.

8. United Arab Emirates 🇦🇪

Incentive: Long-term residency and tax advantages

The UAE offers long-term “Golden Visas” for entrepreneurs and investors. While it may not hand out direct cash grants, the absence of personal income tax and strong government support for startups makes it financially attractive.

Dubai and Abu Dhabi continue to expand business-friendly policies to attract global talent.

Why Are Countries Offering Incentives?

Many nations are facing:

Declining birth rates

Ageing populations

Economic stagnation in rural areas

Brain drain to larger economics

By offering financial support or tax advantages, governments aim to stimulate economic growth, create jobs and revitalise local communities. 

Is It Really “Free Money

Not exactly.

Most schemes require:

A viable business plan

Minimum investment thresholds

Job creation commitments

Proof of financial stability

However, for entrepreneurs willing to relocate, these programmes can significantly reduce startup risk and offer a pathway to residency or even citizenship.

Final Thoughts

For ambitious founders — particularly those feeling squeezed by rising costs in the UK or other major economies — relocating abroad could offer not only financial incentives but a better lifestyle and long-term opportunity.

As global competition for talent intensifies, countries are increasingly willing to invest in people who are ready to invest in them.

Attached is a news article regarding 8 countries that will pay you money to live and start a business 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-15197557/countries-paying-people-including-destination-offering-72-000.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  President Revokes Landmark Greenhouse Gas Rules in Sweeping Policy Shift In a move that is a...