Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.
Kane Morrison and the Shooting That Targeted His Family Home
A violent gang feud in Greater Manchester escalated in October 2015 when the family home of Kane Morrison became the target of a shooting, leaving a member of his family seriously injured.
Morrison, from Little Hulton, was later identified by police and prosecutors as being connected to a series of shootings carried out during a violent feud between rival organised crime groups in the Salford area. Greater Manchester Police subsequently obtained a civil injunction against Morrison as part of efforts to stop the violence.
According to evidence presented during the later court case, the chain of violence began when rivals fired a shotgun at Morrison’s home address on 10 October 2015. A family member was seriously injured during the attack. The incident then became a catalyst for a retaliatory series of shootings.
Reports surrounding the wider feud state that, during an earlier shooting at the home of Morrison’s mother, her partner was shot in the back. The attack demonstrated how the conflict had extended beyond the alleged gang members themselves and placed relatives and people inside family homes at serious risk.
Following the attack on Morrison’s family, prosecutors said Morrison and other members of the group met later that day and planned retaliation. At approximately 10.05pm, Morrison and Harry Allen travelled by moped to an address in Farnworth, where shots were fired at a property while a couple were inside watching television. Fortunately, nobody was injured in that particular attack.
The violence continued with another shooting at a property in Little Hulton just over an hour later.
Police eventually pieced together the events using CCTV footage and telephone records, establishing the involvement of several men. The investigation resulted in a major criminal case involving six men and the wider Salford gang feud.
In October 2017, Morrison pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess a firearm with intent to endanger life. He was sentenced at Manchester Crown Court to 17 years in prison, with the sentence also including offences involving a mobile phone and SIM card while he was in prison.
The case illustrates the devastating consequences of gang-related violence: when firearms are used in disputes between rival groups, the danger can quickly reach innocent relatives, partners and residents who have no involvement in the conflict.
The shooting at Morrison’s family home was therefore more than another episode in a gang feud. It showed how violence between rival groups could spill directly into family homes, putting ordinary people in the line of fire.
Attached is a article on gang member Kane Morrison who mother home was shot at
Serine Sanneh Faces Serious Allegation Involving a 13-Year-Old Girl
Baller League goalkeeper Serine Sanneh has reportedly become the subject of serious allegations involving a 13-year-old girl, prompting widespread discussion online.
Sanneh, a former England youth goalkeeper who has also been associated with professional academies including West Ham and has appeared in the Baller League, has recently been mentioned in social-media posts alleging that he was arrested in connection with an offence involving a minor. However, at the time of publication, the claims circulating online have not been sufficiently verified by authoritative sources to establish exactly what happened or what charges, if any, have formally been brought.
Allegations circulating online
Posts circulating on social media have described Sanneh using extremely serious language and have referred to alleged offences involving a 13-year-old girl. One widely circulated post claimed that the Baller League player had been arrested on an allegation involving a minor.
However, social-media claims should not automatically be treated as established facts. Another publicly available post concerning Sanneh states that an allegation has been described as false, highlighting that there are conflicting claims surrounding the situation.
The allegations are extremely serious because they concern a child. At the same time, an allegation or arrest does not mean that a person has been found guilty.
Unless and until a court establishes the facts, Sanneh remains entitled to the presumption of innocence. It is therefore important to distinguish between what has been alleged online, what police may have investigated, what charges may have been filed and what has actually been proven in court.
Sanneh’s football career
Before becoming known through the Baller League, Sanneh represented England at youth level and spent time within academy football. He has been photographed and reported alongside players who went on to become major names in the professional game, including Cole Palmer.
The 23-year-old goalkeeper later joined the Baller League and was managed by former England and Chelsea captain John Terry. His football career had previously been described as a fight to return to the professional game after setbacks.
Because the alleged victim is a child, identifying information about the girl should not be published. Any reporting should also avoid presenting unverified social-media accusations as established facts.
If formal proceedings are taking place, the evidence presented in court will ultimately determine what can be established.
At present, the responsible position is to describe the matter as an allegation and not label Serine Sanneh a convicted sexual offender or predator unless a court has established that fact.
Attached is a news article regarding a ballers league player targeting a 13 year old
Meta Faces Billions in Social Media Addiction Settlement After Landmark Teen Trial
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has agreed to pay billions of dollars to settle a landmark legal battle over allegations that its platforms contributed to social-media addiction and harmed young people’s wellbeing.
The case has become one of the biggest legal challenges ever faced by a social-media company. Dozens of US states accused Meta of deliberately designing Facebook and Instagram in ways that encouraged young users to spend excessive amounts of time on its platforms.
After months of legal proceedings and testimony, Meta agreed to a settlement that could be worth up to $18 billion. The agreement covers claims brought by 48 US states and territories and also requires Meta to introduce stronger protections for teenagers.
What was Meta accused of?
The states alleged that Meta knew its products could have harmful effects on children and teenagers while continuing to use features designed to maximise engagement.
Among the features examined were recommendation algorithms, notifications, infinite scrolling and other mechanisms that can encourage users to remain on the platforms for longer periods.
During the trial, Instagram chief Adam Mosseri faced questions about the company’s efforts to encourage teenagers to take breaks from the platform. Evidence presented in court examined the use of Instagram’s “Take a Break” feature and how few teenagers initially activated it.
The states argued that excessive social-media use could contribute to problems including anxiety, depression, body-image concerns and other mental-health difficulties among young people.
Meta has denied deliberately designing its services to addict children and has disputed claims that its platforms are responsible for the wider decline in adolescent mental health.
Major changes for teenagers
The settlement is not only about money.
Meta has agreed to introduce stronger restrictions and safety measures for younger users. Among the reported changes are daily usage limits, restrictions on overnight access, stronger parental controls and changes to notifications and content recommendations.
Teen accounts are also expected to receive greater protection from certain forms of harmful content and features that can encourage social comparison.
The settlement could therefore have a major effect on how teenagers use Facebook and Instagram in the United States.
How much will Meta actually pay?
The headline figure is potentially $18 billion, although the settlement is structured over a number of years rather than representing one immediate payment.
Reports indicate that a substantial portion is guaranteed, while additional payments are linked to whether competing platforms introduce comparable child-safety measures.
This is considerably larger than the $1.7 billion figure that has circulated in some reports or social-media discussions.
The settlement also does not necessarily end every legal battle facing Meta. Individual families, schools and other parties continue to pursue separate claims involving alleged harms caused by social-media platforms.
A warning for the entire technology industry
The case could have consequences far beyond Meta.
State officials and campaigners argue that social-media companies should be held responsible for how their products affect children, rather than simply leaving parents to control how much time their children spend online.
The settlement may also increase pressure on other major platforms, including TikTok, YouTube and Snapchat, to introduce stronger protections for younger users.
For Meta, the agreement represents a significant financial and reputational setback, but the company continues to deny wrongdoing.
The wider question now is whether billions of dollars in penalties and stricter controls will be enough to change the way social-media platforms are designed — or whether technology companies will continue to rely on systems designed to keep users coming back.
The Meta case could ultimately become a turning point in the battle over children’s safety online, with governments increasingly challenging the business models behind the world’s biggest social-media platforms.
Attached is a news article regarding meta paying 17.1 billion dollars over addiction on social media
Major Fire Erupts Near Wembley Stadium as Huge Smoke Plume Covers North-West London
A major fire broke out at an industrial estate near Wembley Stadium in north-west London, sending a huge column of dark smoke into the sky and triggering a major emergency response.
The blaze began on Friday morning, 28 August, at a mixed-waste facility on Hannah Close in Neasden, less than a mile from Wembley Stadium. London Fire Brigade received more than 70 calls reporting the incident, with the first call coming in at around 11:34am.
Around 20 fire engines and 125 firefighters were deployed to tackle the blaze. Fire crews found a large industrial unit, measuring approximately 100 metres by 150 metres, well alight. Specialist equipment, including 32-metre aerial ladders, a drone team, a hose-laying unit and a high-volume pump, was brought in to help firefighters fight the flames.
Huge smoke cloud seen across London
The intensity of the fire produced enormous plumes of smoke that could be seen from parts of London. Residents close to the incident were advised to close their doors and windows and remain indoors where possible because of the amount of smoke being produced.
A nearby Amazon warehouse was also evacuated as a precaution. Authorities stressed that the warehouse was separate from the industrial building where the fire started.
Major transport disruption
The fire also caused significant disruption to London’s transport network.
The incident created particular concern because of the fire’s proximity to the busy Wembley area, although there was no indication that Wembley Stadium itself had caught fire.
Fire brought under control
Firefighters eventually brought the blaze under control at around 5pm, although crews remained at the scene to continue extinguishing hotspots and making the area safe.
At the time of reporting, the cause of the fire had not been established, and an investigation was expected to determine how the blaze began.
The London Ambulance Service said an incident response officer attended, but no patients were being treated in connection with the fire at the time of the initial response.
The Himalayas are among the youngest major mountain ranges on Earth, but their formation was not a single event that happened in one particular year. Instead, the mountains developed over tens of millions of years as two enormous tectonic plates collided.
How did the Himalayas form?
The story begins roughly 50–60 million years ago, when the Indian tectonic plate was moving northwards and eventually collided with the Eurasian Plate.
Before the collision, the region between India and Eurasia was covered partly by the ancient Tethys Ocean. As the Indian Plate moved north, the oceanic sediments accumulated over millions of years.
When India collided with Eurasia, the Earth’s crust was compressed, folded and pushed upwards. This enormous geological collision gradually created the Himalayan mountain range.
Scientists generally place the beginning of the main Himalayan mountain-building phase at around 50 million years ago, although some geological evidence indicates that mountain-building and crustal deformation began earlier.
The mountains are still growing
One of the most remarkable facts about the Himalayas is that their formation has not completely stopped.
The Indian Plate continues to move northwards and push against the Eurasian Plate. This ongoing collision causes parts of the Himalayas to continue rising, although erosion, landslides and earthquakes constantly wear the mountains down.
Mount Everest, the highest point on Earth above sea level, is part of this enormous mountain system.
A mountain range millions of years in the making
So, if we ask “What year did the Himalayas form?”, there isn’t one exact year.
A useful timeline is:
* Around 200+ million years ago: India was part of the ancient supercontinent Gondwana.
* Around 120–100 million years ago: The Indian Plate began travelling rapidly northwards.
* Around 50–60 million years ago: India collided with Eurasia, beginning the major phase of Himalayan mountain building.
* Millions of years afterward: Continued compression pushed the Earth’s crust upward and developed the enormous range we recognise today.
* Today: India is still pushing into Eurasia, meaning the Himalayas remain geologically active.
A mountain range still being created
The Himalayas are therefore not simply an ancient mountain range that formed and stopped changing. They are the result of an ongoing continental collision.
The same geological forces responsible for creating the mountains continue to produce earthquakes and uplift across the region.
Attached is a news article regarding how the Himalayas mountain was formed
For decades, Sir Richard Branson’s Necker Island has represented extraordinary wealth, luxury and celebrity. What began as an ambitious purchase by a young entrepreneur for just $180,000 in 1979 has been transformed into one of the world’s most exclusive private island retreats.
But in recent years, Necker Island has attracted attention for reasons far beyond luxury tourism.
Questions have resurfaced about Branson’s political connections, his relationship with controversial financier Jeffrey Epstein, and a 2017 allegation involving a singer who said she was sexually harassed at a party on the island.
From $180,000 to a multimillion-dollar paradise
Branson has explained that he originally became interested in Necker Island while looking for somewhere in the Caribbean to impress his then-girlfriend Joan Templeman.
The island was reportedly being offered for millions of dollars, but Branson did not have the money. After making a much lower offer, he eventually agreed a purchase price of $180,000. Branson himself has described how the deal came together.
Today, Necker Island is a completely different proposition.
The 74-acre island has been transformed into a luxury resort capable of hosting wealthy guests and celebrities, with accommodation, private beaches, pools and extensive facilities. Reports have placed the cost of renting the entire island at well over $100,000 per night.
Claims circulating online that the island is now simply “worth $100 million” should therefore be treated cautiously. There does not appear to be a reliable current public valuation establishing that exact figure. What is beyond dispute is the extraordinary increase in the island’s commercial value and earning potential since Branson bought the undeveloped property.
The Epstein connection
One of the biggest reasons Necker Island has recently returned to the spotlight is Jeffrey Epstein.
Newly released Epstein-related records have documented contact between Epstein and Branson. In a 2013 email, Branson invited Epstein to visit Necker Island, and other correspondence discussed arrangements surrounding visits to the Caribbean.
The records have inevitably raised questions because Epstein owned Little St James in the US Virgin Islands, another private Caribbean island associated with his criminal activities.
However, proximity between islands should not be confused with evidence of criminal conduct.
Branson’s representatives have said that his contact with Epstein was limited to a small number of group or business encounters. They have also said Branson later rejected a charitable donation after his team learned more about Epstein’s background and allegations. Branson has not been charged with an Epstein-related crime.
The newly published correspondence nevertheless provides evidence that the two men knew one another and that Epstein was invited to Necker Island.
That is a significant fact, but it is not proof that Branson was involved in Epstein’s criminal activities.
The 2010 allegation at Necker Island
Another controversy surrounding Necker Island dates back to 2010.
Antonia Jenae, an American singer who was working as a backing singer for Joss Stone, alleged that Branson behaved inappropriately towards her during a party on Necker Island.
Jenae claimed that Branson approached her as guests were saying goodbye and put his face against her breasts. She said she was shocked by what happened and claimed Joss Stone was present afterwards.
The allegation was widely reported in 2017.
Branson denied remembering the incident. A spokeswoman for Virgin Management said that there was no intention to offend or make anyone uncomfortable and said Branson had no recollection of the alleged incident. Joss Stone’s father, Richard Stoker, who was also present, described the group’s afternoon on the island as enjoyable.
It is therefore important not to present the allegation as an established fact. It remains an allegation made by Jenae, which Branson said he did not remember.
Branson’s political history is also more complicated than some social-media claims suggest.
He has at various times expressed views that aligned with Conservative policies. In 2010, for example, he publicly supported the Conservatives’ approach to reducing the government deficit.
However, describing him simply as a long-standing Conservative Party member would be misleading.
Branson has also criticised Conservative policies and has had relationships with politicians from different sides of British politics. In 1998, he even claimed that he had been pressured to make a Conservative donation during the National Lottery bidding process, an allegation reported by The Independent at the time.
His political associations therefore need to be separated from the much more serious claims now being discussed online.
Why Necker Island continues to attract attention
There are several reasons the island has become the subject of fascination.
First, there is the extraordinary story of how Branson acquired it for $180,000 and transformed an undeveloped Caribbean island into a luxury retreat.
Second, the island has hosted numerous famous and influential people over the years.
Third, the 2010 allegation involving Antonia Jenae placed Necker Island at the centre of a sexual-misconduct controversy.
And now, the release of additional Epstein-related documents has put Branson’s historical contact with Epstein under renewed scrutiny.
The combination of extreme wealth, private islands, famous guests and connections between powerful individuals naturally creates intense public interest.
But there is an important distinction between documented associations, allegations and proven criminal conduct.
The bigger question
The renewed scrutiny of Richard Branson and Necker Island is ultimately part of a much wider public debate about how wealthy and influential people interacted within elite social circles.
The Epstein files have shown that Epstein had relationships or correspondence with a remarkable number of prominent individuals. Being mentioned in those records does not, by itself, mean someone committed a crime.
In Branson’s case, there is documented evidence of communication and meetings with Epstein, including discussions involving Necker Island. There is also a separately documented allegation of inappropriate behaviour at a 2010 party on the island.
Those facts deserve scrutiny and accurate reporting.
But the evidence currently available does not justify turning allegations or associations into claims that Branson was involved in Epstein’s crimes.
Necker Island began as a $180,000 gamble by a young businessman. More than four decades later, it has become a symbol of billionaire wealth — and increasingly, a place surrounded by questions about the people who have passed through its gates.
One of the most disturbing incidents connected with Necker Island occurred in August 2025, when Sihle Somdaka, an executive sous chef working at the luxury resort, died following an accident on the island.
Somdaka, who was originally from South Africa and had worked in high-end restaurants in places including Kuwait, Qatar and Johannesburg, was reportedly 35 or 37 years old in different reports. He was a father of two and had become part of the Necker Island team.
According to reports, the incident happened late on 29 August 2025, with the Royal Virgin Islands Police Force confirming that a fatal incident occurred in the early hours of 30 August.
Somdaka was reportedly travelling in an electric buggy after attending a farewell gathering at the island’s Great House. He apparently lost control of the vehicle while travelling down a steep area of the island and suffered a serious head injury. A second person involved in the incident suffered non-life-threatening injuries.
Medical staff on the island responded and CPR was reportedly performed. Somdaka was subsequently transported to hospital on Tortola, where he was pronounced dead.
Police investigation
The Royal Virgin Islands Police Force confirmed that officers and other relevant agencies attended the scene and that an investigation was launched to establish exactly what had happened. Police described it as a tragic event and offered condolences to Somdaka’s family, friends and colleagues.
The fact that police investigated the death is important, but it should not be interpreted as evidence that the death was a murder or that foul play was established.
Reports later identified Somdaka as the deceased chef. Virgin Limited Edition, which operates Necker Island, said it was deeply saddened by the loss and described him as a talented and exceptional member of the Necker Island family.
Questions surrounding the circumstances
The tragedy nevertheless generated questions because of the circumstances surrounding the accident. Some media reports quoted unnamed sources alleging a culture of excessive partying on the island and claimed that there had previously been near misses involving staff and guests. Those claims are allegations from unidentified sources and have not been established as findings by police.
There is also no reliable evidence in the reporting reviewed that Richard Branson was present when Somdaka died. Reports stated that Branson was not on Necker Island at the time and that he was informed of the tragedy afterwards.
The death therefore raises legitimate questions about what happened that night and why the accident occurred, but it is important to distinguish questions and allegations from proven facts.
For an investigative article about Necker Island, Somdaka’s death is particularly significant because it is a recent, independently reported tragedy that resulted in an official police investigation. It should not, however, be presented as evidence of a wider criminal conspiracy without further evidence.
Attached is a news article regarding Richard Branson island and connections to Jeffrey Epstein
Flash Floods Hit Birmingham as Thunderstorms Bring Torrential Rain
Birmingham has been hit by significant flash flooding after powerful thunderstorms and torrential rain swept across the West Midlands, leaving homes, roads and vehicles overwhelmed by rapidly rising water.
The worst conditions were reported on Wednesday evening, particularly around Perry Barr and areas near the Perry Brook and Tame Valley canal. West Midlands Fire Service said crews responded to significant flooding, with 32 properties affected near the Tame Valley canal. Seven fire engines were sent to the area.
Residents described how quickly the water rose. One homeowner in Perry Barr, Ryan Goodwin, said his conservatory was flooded with around 3ft (1 metre) of water, while water also entered his living room and damaged the property.
Roads turned into rivers
The intense downpours caused streets across parts of Birmingham to become submerged, leaving some motorists stranded and making roads difficult and dangerous to use.
Birmingham City Council urged people to take care and avoid walking, cycling or driving through floodwater, while emergency services worked with the council to respond to affected communities.
A flood warning was issued for Perry Brook at Perry Barr, with additional flood alerts covering waterways including the River Cole, River Rea and Upper Tame.
From drought to flooding
The flooding came after weeks of exceptionally hot and dry weather across England and Wales. The prolonged dry conditions left the ground hard and less able to absorb sudden, intense rainfall, increasing surface-water runoff and the risk of flash flooding.
The Met Office warned that thunderstorms could produce 20–30mm of rain in an hour locally, with some areas potentially receiving more than 75mm over 12 hours. Hail, lightning and strong winds were also possible.
The Environment Agency has warned that heavy rainfall can cause rivers and drainage systems to respond rapidly, particularly when large amounts of water fall over a short period.
More unsettled weather ahead
The flooding in Birmingham is part of a wider change in the UK’s weather pattern, with thunderstorms and heavy rain replacing the prolonged heat and drought experienced earlier in the summer.
Further thunderstorms and heavy rain were forecast across parts of England and Wales, meaning residents in areas vulnerable to flooding were being advised to monitor official warnings and avoid unnecessary travel through flooded areas.
For residents whose homes and businesses were affected, Birmingham City Council said it was working with West Midlands Fire Service and other agencies, including carrying out visits to identify vulnerable residents and arrange follow-up support.
The Birmingham flooding is a reminder of how quickly weather conditions can change. After weeks of intense heat and drought, a sudden burst of torrential rain was enough to overwhelm drainage systems and turn roads into fast-moving streams within minutes.
Attached is a news article regarding flash floods in Birmingham
Andrew Tate appeared before a federal court in Miami this week as he and his brother Tristan Tate continued their fight against extradition to the United Kingdom, where they face serious criminal allegations including rape, assault and trafficking for sexual exploitation.
The hearing was not a trial or a verdict on the allegations themselves. Instead, the brothers were asking a US judge to release them from custody while the extradition proceedings continue.
Baby mother takes the witness stand
One of the most notable moments came when Natasha Sesay, the mother of Andrew Tate’s young child, gave evidence in support of him.
Sesay described Tate as a caring father and attempted to draw a distinction between the man she knows privately and the controversial personality he presents online. She told the court that she believed his online persona did not accurately represent his behaviour in private.
During questioning by prosecutors, however, Sesay acknowledged that Tate provides significant financial support to her, including a home in Dubai and expensive gifts. Reports also said that the couple are expecting another child through surrogacy.
Her testimony was therefore used by Tate’s defence to portray him as a responsible father and to challenge the prosecution’s argument that he should remain behind bars.
Andrew Tate gives evidence
Andrew Tate himself also took the witness stand. He denied the criminal allegations against him and argued that his provocative social-media personality was exaggerated for entertainment and business purposes.
His lawyers argued that keeping the brothers in custody was making it difficult for them to prepare their legal defence, including their ongoing legal matters in Romania.
Prosecutors took a very different position. They argued that Tate and his brother could present a flight risk because of their financial resources, international connections and previous conduct. Prosecutors also raised concerns about material they say demonstrates the brothers’ willingness to disregard legal restrictions.
The prosecution also pointed to Tate’s online statements and videos as evidence relevant to whether he could pose a danger to the community.
What happened to the bail request?
Despite the lengthy hearing, the judge did not issue a final decision on bail.
US Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis postponed the decision and requested further information before deciding whether the brothers should remain in federal custody or be released under strict conditions.
The defence had proposed conditions including surrendering passports and electronic monitoring.
Therefore, there was no “not guilty” or “guilty” verdict at this hearing.
What charges does Andrew Tate face in Britain?
The UK’s Crown Prosecution Service announced in July 2026 that it had authorised additional charges against Andrew Tate.
According to the CPS, Tate faces seven additional counts of rape, three counts of arranging or facilitating trafficking for sexual exploitation, three counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and 19 charges relating to alleged indecent images of a child and extreme pornography. The CPS said the allegations relate to four additional victims, bringing the total number of alleged victims in the case to seven.
Tate denies the allegations.
His arrest in the United States followed a British extradition request. The extradition proceedings will determine whether he is sent back to Britain to face the UK legal process.
So, what was the verdict?
There was no final verdict against Andrew Tate at the Miami hearing.
The court was deciding whether he should be released on bail while he fights extradition. Judge Lauren Louis delayed her decision, meaning Tate and his brother remained in US federal custody following the hearing.
The substantive criminal allegations still have to be dealt with through the appropriate courts, and Tate remains legally presumed innocent unless and until he is convicted.
The next major stage is the extradition process, which could determine whether Andrew Tate is returned to the UK to face the charges authorised by British prosecutors.
Attached is a News article regarding Andrew and Tristan Tates bail hearing
King Harald V of Norway Dies Aged 89 After More Than Three Decades on the Throne
Norway is mourning the death of King Harald V, who has passed away at the age of 89 after more than 35 years as the country’s monarch.
King Harald V died peacefully at Oslo University Hospital on Friday, August 28, 2026, at 6:35am, according to an announcement from the Norwegian Royal Court.
Born on February 21, 1937, Harald became King of Norway in January 1991 following the death of his father, King Olav V. He went on to become one of Europe’s longest-serving monarchs and was widely regarded as a unifying figure within Norwegian society.
During his reign, King Harald became known for his approachable personality and his efforts to represent modern Norwegian society. He was particularly praised for speaking about tolerance, diversity and the importance of bringing people together.
His leadership was especially significant following the devastating terrorist attacks of July 22, 2011. The King provided emotional support to the Norwegian people during one of the country’s darkest periods and became an important symbol of national unity.
King Harald was also passionate about sailing and represented Norway at three Olympic Games. His marriage to Queen Sonja, whom he married in 1968, was regarded as an important moment in the modernisation of the Norwegian monarchy.
The Royal Court confirmed that the King had died peacefully in hospital. His death has prompted national mourning, with flags being lowered and tributes being paid across Norway.
Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre said the country was mourning while expressing gratitude for the King’s long life of service. He described Harald as a monarch who helped bring people together during difficult moments.
Following King Harald’s death, his son, Crown Prince Haakon, automatically became Norway’s new monarch. The succession will now begin a new chapter for the Norwegian royal family and the country.
King Harald leaves behind Queen Sonja, his children and grandchildren, as well as a legacy spanning more than three decades at the centre of Norwegian public life.
For many Norwegians, his death marks the end of an era. A monarch who dedicated much of his life to serving his country is now being remembered as a symbol of stability, compassion and national unity.
Attached is a news article regarding the king of Norway passing away
Jorge Messi, Father of Football Legend Lionel Messi, Dies Aged 68
Jorge Messi, the father of Argentine football superstar Lionel Messi and a longtime figure behind his son’s career, has died at the age of 68.
Jorge passed away in Rosario, Argentina, following a long illness. His death was confirmed in early August 2026, with reports stating that he had been receiving medical treatment in the city where the Messi family has its roots.
For Lionel Messi, Jorge was far more than a father. He played an important role in the development of his son’s football career from a young age and later became his business representative and agent.
Jorge was closely involved as Lionel progressed from playing football as a child in Rosario to becoming one of the most famous footballers in the world. His influence continued throughout Messi’s professional career, including during his years at Barcelona, Paris Saint-Germain and Inter Miami.
The death came after Jorge’s health had reportedly deteriorated during the 2026 World Cup period. His condition meant that he was unable to watch his son compete in the tournament.
Lionel Messi later paid an emotional tribute to his father, describing the difficulty of facing life without him and reflecting on the years they had shared together. Messi also admitted that his father’s death had left him questioning whether he wanted to continue playing football for much longer.
The loss has therefore affected not only Messi’s personal life but potentially his future in professional football.
Jorge’s contribution to his son’s extraordinary journey has also been recognised by clubs connected with Messi’s early career. Newell’s Old Boys described Jorge as a pillar who supported Lionel’s career with vision, discipline and affection.
Jorge Messi leaves behind his wife, Celia Cuccittini, and his children, including Lionel, Rodrigo, Matías and María Sol.
His death marks a deeply personal moment for one of football’s greatest stars. While Lionel Messi’s achievements on the pitch have made him a global icon, behind that remarkable journey was a father who helped guide him from his earliest days in Rosario.
For the Messi family, Jorge’s legacy will remain closely connected to the extraordinary career of the son he supported from childhood.
Attached is a news article regarding jorge Messi passing away
