222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Thursday, 20 February 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

In a high-profile legal battle that captivated the entertainment world, rapper A$AP Rocky, born Rakim Mayers, was acquitted of all charges related to a 2021 shooting incident involving his former friend, Terell Ephron, also known as A$AP Relli. The trial, which concluded on February 18, 2025, saw Mayers facing two felony counts of assault with a semiautomatic firearm. Throughout the proceedings, his partner, global superstar Rihanna, stood by his side, providing unwavering support.

The Incident and Legal Proceedings

The case stemmed from an altercation on November 6, 2021, in Hollywood, where Ephron alleged that Mayers fired a handgun at him during a dispute. Mayers was arrested in April 2022 upon returning to Los Angeles from a vacation with Rihanna. Despite the serious nature of the charges, which carried a potential 24-year prison sentence, Mayers maintained his innocence, rejecting a plea deal and opting for a jury trial. His defense argued that the weapon in question was a prop gun used in a music video and that any shots fired were blanks, suggesting he acted in self-defense. After three weeks of testimony and deliberation, the jury found Mayers not guilty on all counts.

Rihanna’s Support

Rihanna’s presence was a constant throughout the trial. She attended court sessions regularly, often accompanied by the couple’s two young sons, RZA and Riot. Her attendance underscored the family’s solidarity during this challenging period. In a particularly poignant moment, Rihanna brought their children into the courtroom during closing arguments, highlighting the personal stakes involved. Following the acquittal, she expressed her gratitude on social media, stating, “Glory belongs to God,” and thanked supporters for their prayers.

Emotional Aftermath and Future Plans

The courtroom erupted in emotion upon the reading of the not guilty verdict. Mayers leaped over the court bench to embrace a tearful Rihanna, a moment captured and widely shared across media platforms. Expressing his relief, Mayers thanked the jury and described the experience as “crazy,” emphasizing his gratitude for the support received.

In the wake of the trial, the couple has been the subject of various reports regarding their future plans. Some outlets suggest that Mayers and Rihanna are considering marriage, potentially in Rihanna’s native Barbados, as they look forward to a new chapter in their lives. Additionally, in a lighthearted exchange, Mayers’ attorney, Joe Tacopina, joked that the couple might name their next child after him, a testament to the close bond formed during the legal proceedings.

This trial has not only tested the resilience of A$AP Rocky and Rihanna but has also showcased their steadfast commitment to each other and their family. As they move past this legal hurdle, the couple appears poised to focus on their personal lives and future endeavors.In a high-profile legal battle that captivated the entertainment world, rapper A$AP Rocky, born Rakim Mayers, was acquitted of all charges related to a 2021 shooting incident involving his former friend, Terell Ephron, also known as A$AP Relli. The trial, which concluded on February 18, 2025, saw Mayers facing two felony counts of assault with a semiautomatic firearm. Throughout the proceedings, his partner, global superstar Rihanna, stood by his side, providing unwavering support.

The Incident and Legal Proceedings

Rihanna’s Support

Emotional Aftermath and Future Plans

Attached is a news article regarding ASAP rocky trial over shooting a prop gun

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna191822

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Dame Priti Patel’s Views on the Ukraine War

Dame Priti Patel, the former UK Home Secretary, has been vocal in her support for Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. As a senior Conservative MP, she has aligned herself with the UK government’s firm backing of Ukraine, advocating for strong sanctions against Russia and increased military and humanitarian aid for Ukrainians.

Support for Ukraine and Criticism of Russia

Patel has consistently condemned Russia’s aggression, labeling it a blatant violation of international law. She has expressed unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, arguing that the UK must stand with its allies in pushing back against Russian expansionism. Like many Conservative politicians, she has framed the war as a crucial battle for democracy, warning that a Russian victory would embolden authoritarian regimes worldwide.

Role in the Refugee Response

During her tenure as Home Secretary, Patel played a key role in shaping the UK’s response to Ukrainian refugees. The UK government introduced the Homes for Ukraine scheme, allowing British citizens to sponsor and host Ukrainian refugees. However, Patel faced significant criticism over delays in visa processing and bureaucratic hurdles that left many Ukrainians stranded. Some MPs and humanitarian groups accused the Home Office of being too slow and restrictive compared to the EU’s more open approach. Patel defended the system, arguing that security checks were necessary to prevent exploitation and ensure national safety.

Sanctions and Tough Stance on Russia

Patel has supported strict economic sanctions against Russia, including asset freezes on Russian oligarchs and measures targeting Russian financial institutions. She has emphasized the importance of economic pressure in weakening Vladimir Putin’s war machine, urging continued Western unity in isolating Russia on the global stage.

A Long-Term View on Security

Beyond immediate military aid and sanctions, Patel has also spoken about the long-term security challenges posed by Russia. She has called for the UK to strengthen its defense capabilities and deepen alliances within NATO. She has also stressed the importance of cracking down on illicit Russian money in the UK, an issue that has been a longstanding concern in British politics.

Conclusion

Dame Priti Patel remains a strong supporter of Ukraine, advocating for robust military, economic, and diplomatic measures to counter Russia. While her time as Home Secretary saw controversies over the UK’s refugee response, her broader stance has been in line with the Conservative government’s commitment to assisting Ukraine and punishing Russian aggression. With the war ongoing, Patel continues to push for firm action, arguing that a decisive defeat of Russia is essential for global stability.

Attached is a news article regarding priti Patel views on the Ukraine war

https://www.gbnews.com/politics/priti-patel-britain-step-up-defence-spending-number-one

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Muhsin Hendricks, widely recognized as the world’s first openly gay imam, was fatally shot on February 15, 2025, near Gqeberha, South Africa. The 57-year-old cleric was ambushed while en route to officiate the weddings of two interfaith heterosexual couples. Two masked assailants blocked his vehicle and fired multiple shots, resulting in his death. The motive for the attack remains under investigation, with authorities exploring the possibility of a hate crime.

Hendricks was a pioneering advocate for LGBTQ+ rights within the Muslim community. In 2011, he founded the Al-Ghurbaah mosque in Cape Town, providing a safe haven for LGBTQ+ and other marginalized Muslims. Despite facing threats and opposition from conservative religious groups, he remained steadfast in promoting inclusivity and acceptance.

His untimely death has elicited widespread condemnation and mourning. The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA) denounced the killing and called for a thorough investigation. The South African Human Rights Commission praised Hendricks’ efforts to challenge discrimination and promote human rights within religious contexts.

Hendricks’ legacy as a trailblazer for LGBTQ+ Muslims endures, inspiring many to continue advocating for acceptance and equality within faith communities.

• Victim: Muhsin Hendricks, the world’s first openly gay imam.

• Incident: Shot dead on February 15, 2025, near Gqeberha, South Africa.

• Circumstances: Ambushed by two masked gunmen while traveling to officiate weddings.

• Possible Motive: Authorities investigating whether it was a hate crime.

• Background: Founded the Al-Ghurbaah mosque in Cape Town in 2011, providing a safe space for LGBTQ+ Muslims.

• Challenges: Faced threats and opposition from conservative religious groups.

• Reactions: Global condemnation from human rights organizations; calls for justice.

• Legacy: Remembered as a pioneer for LGBTQ+ rights in the Muslim community.

Muhsin Hendricks’ tragic death marks a profound loss for both the LGBTQ+ and Muslim communities. As a trailblazer for inclusivity in faith, his work challenged deeply rooted prejudices and provided a voice for marginalized individuals. While his murder highlights the persistent dangers faced by those advocating for equality, his legacy of courage and compassion will continue to inspire future generations. The global outcry following his death underscores the urgent need for stronger protections against hate crimes and greater acceptance within religious spaces.

Attached is a news article regarding the gay imam shot dead in South Africa

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly3nlv5d52o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Wednesday, 19 February 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

In a tragic event on Tasmania’s remote northwest coast, 157 false killer whales have been found stranded near the Arthur River. Despite prompt response efforts, the challenging location and adverse weather conditions have severely hindered rescue operations. As a result, authorities have made the difficult decision to euthanize the approximately 90 whales that remained alive, prioritizing their welfare and the safety of personnel involved.

False killer whales, despite their name, are large members of the dolphin family, typically inhabiting deep offshore waters in tropical and subtropical oceans. This incident marks the first mass stranding of false killer whales in Tasmania since 1974, when over 160 were similarly stranded. The exact cause of such strandings remains unclear, and examinations of the carcasses are planned to seek potential insights.

The inaccessibility of the beach, combined with challenging ocean conditions, has complicated the response efforts. Transporting specialized equipment to the remote area has proven difficult, further impeding rescue attempts. Authorities have emphasized the importance of public safety and have advised locals and tourists to avoid the area, especially as ongoing bushfire responses are also underway nearby.

This event adds to a series of similar incidents in recent years, highlighting the need for continued research into the causes of mass whale strandings and the development of effective response strategies.

Key Points: 157 Stranded Whales in Tasmania

• Incident: 157 false killer whales were found stranded near Arthur River on Tasmania’s northwest coast.

• Response Challenges: Harsh weather and a remote location made rescue efforts extremely difficult.

• Euthanasia Decision: Authorities euthanized approximately 90 surviving whales to prevent prolonged suffering.

• Species Information: False killer whales are large dolphins that usually inhabit deep tropical and subtropical waters.

• Historical Context: This is the first mass stranding of false killer whales in Tasmania since 1974, when over 160 were stranded.

• Unknown Causes: The reason for the stranding is unclear, and examinations of carcasses are planned for further study.

• Safety Warnings: Authorities advised the public to avoid the area due to dangerous ocean conditions and ongoing bushfire responses.

• Wider Context: Adds to a series of mass whale strandings, emphasizing the need for continued research and better response strategies.

Conclusion

The tragic mass stranding of 157 false killer whales on Tasmania’s remote northwest coast underscores the ongoing mystery of why such events occur. Despite rapid response efforts, the remote location and harsh conditions made rescue attempts nearly impossible, leading authorities to euthanize the surviving whales to prevent further suffering.

This event, the first of its kind in Tasmania since 1974, raises crucial questions about the environmental and biological factors contributing to mass strandings. While examinations of the carcasses may provide some insights, the broader issue remains unresolved.

Moving forward, continued research and investment in better response strategies are essential to mitigate the impact of future strandings. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerability of marine life and the urgent need for further scientific investigation into these distressing occurrences.

Attached is a news article regarding 150+ stranded whales

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd7e38py4geo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The Rise of Knife Crime: How Online Sales Are Fueling the Crisis

Knife crime has been a persistent issue in the UK, but recent trends suggest that the ease of purchasing weapons online is making the problem worse. With just a few clicks, anyone—including teenagers—can order deadly blades and have them delivered straight to their doorstep, often with little to no age verification. This alarming accessibility raises serious concerns about regulation and enforcement in an era where online shopping dominates retail.

The Surge in Online Knife Sales

A quick search on various e-commerce platforms reveals an array of knives available for sale, ranging from standard kitchen utensils to combat-style blades, machetes, and so-called “zombie knives.” While some of these weapons are marketed for outdoor activities such as camping or self-defense, they are increasingly falling into the wrong hands. Criminals and gang members can exploit lax online checks to obtain deadly weapons that are illegal to carry in public.

Loopholes in Age Verification

Despite laws prohibiting the sale of knives to under-18s, reports suggest that online retailers are failing to enforce proper age checks. While high-street stores require ID for purchases, many websites rely on basic tick-box declarations that can be easily bypassed. Some sellers on social media and online marketplaces operate without any verification process at all, allowing young people to access knives with minimal effort.

The Link Between Online Knife Sales and Crime

Police forces across the UK have linked rising knife crime to the increased availability of weapons online. In many cases, confiscated knives used in violent incidents were traced back to online purchases. The anonymity of the internet makes it easier for criminals to obtain weapons without stepping into a store, reducing the risk of detection.

Recent figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that knife crime remains a serious issue in cities like London, Birmingham, and Manchester. The Metropolitan Police have repeatedly warned that without stricter regulations on online sales, the cycle of violence will continue.

Government Crackdown and Proposed Changes

In response to growing concerns, the UK government has introduced tougher legislation, including the Offensive Weapons Act 2019, which bans the possession and sale of certain dangerous knives. However, critics argue that enforcement remains weak, and loopholes still allow illegal knife sales to thrive online.

One proposed solution is stronger age verification methods, such as requiring customers to provide official identification before a purchase is completed. Some campaigners also advocate for stricter oversight of online marketplaces, ensuring they take responsibility for preventing the illegal sale of knives.

The Role of Retailers and the Public

Retailers must do more to prevent knives from being sold to those who should not have access to them. Implementing rigorous ID checks, working closely with law enforcement, and removing listings for dangerous weapons can help curb the problem.

At the same time, the public has a role to play. Parents should be aware of what their children are buying online, and communities must work together to discourage young people from carrying weapons. Educational campaigns and initiatives to steer youths away from violence can also contribute to long-term solutions.

Conclusion

The rise in knife crime is a complex issue with multiple causes, but the ease of purchasing knives online has undoubtedly played a role. Without tougher regulations, proper enforcement, and responsible retail practices, online knife sales will continue to fuel violence on UK streets. Addressing this issue requires coordinated action from the government, online marketplaces, law enforcement, and the public to prevent more lives from being lost to knife crime.

Attached is a news article regarding knives sold online that is causing a rise in knife crime

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2016254/Knife-crime-police-epidemic-online/amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

In January 2025, the United Kingdom experienced a notable increase in its inflation rate, reaching 3%, up from 2.5% in December 2024. This marks the highest inflation rate in ten months and surpasses the Bank of England’s 2% target.

Key Drivers of Inflation

Several factors have contributed to this rise:

• Food Prices: Food costs surged by 3.3% due to increased production expenses, influenced by rising energy and water bills, as well as higher raw material prices.

• Transport Costs: There was a significant uptick in transport expenses, particularly in airfares and motor fuel prices.

• Private School Fees: The imposition of a 20% Value Added Tax (VAT) on private education led to a substantial increase in school fees.

Economic Implications

The unexpected rise in inflation poses challenges for the Bank of England’s monetary policy. The Bank recently reduced its main interest rate to 4.5% to address sluggish economic growth and has halved its growth forecast for 2025 to 0.75%. However, with inflation exceeding targets, further rapid interest rate cuts may be reconsidered.

Bank of England Chief Economist Huw Pill emphasized the need for caution regarding additional rate cuts, citing persistent inflationary pressures. While inflation has decreased from its peak in 2022, it remains above the target, with forecasts indicating a temporary rise later in 2025.

Future Outlook

Economists predict that inflation could rise to 3.5% later in the year, influenced by higher domestic energy bills and other cost pressures. This trend may further impact household budgets and complicate economic recovery efforts.

The government aims to mitigate these challenges by reducing business costs and investing in infrastructure to alleviate financial pressures on households. However, the interplay between inflation, wage growth, and employment remains a critical area of focus for policymakers in the coming months.

Key Points on the UK’s 10-Month Inflation Rise

• Inflation Hits 3%: January 2025 saw UK inflation rise to 3%, up from 2.5% in December 2024, marking a 10-month high.

• Main Contributors:

• Food Prices: Increased by 3.3% due to rising production costs.

• Transport Costs: Airfares and fuel prices surged.

• Private School Fees: A new 20% VAT on private education added to household expenses.

• Impact on Monetary Policy:

• The Bank of England had recently cut interest rates to 4.5% to support growth.

• Further rate cuts may now be delayed due to inflation staying above the 2% target.

• Economic Concerns:

• Inflation is expected to reach 3.5% later in 2025.

• Higher energy bills could drive further price increases.

• The Bank of England remains cautious about additional rate reductions.

• Government Response: Plans to ease business costs and invest in infrastructure to reduce financial pressures on households.

Conclusion

The UK’s 10-month high inflation of 3% in January 2025 signals ongoing economic pressures, driven by rising food, transport, and education costs. While the Bank of England had begun cutting interest rates to support growth, persistent inflation may delay further reductions. With projections suggesting inflation could rise to 3.5% later in the year, households and businesses face continued financial strain.

The government’s response—aiming to reduce business costs and invest in infrastructure—may help ease some pressures, but inflation’s trajectory remains uncertain. Policymakers will need to balance economic growth with inflation control in the coming months, making the Bank of England’s decisions on interest rates critical for the UK’s financial stability.

Attached is a news article regarding the inflation rise rate

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0l18pzrz00o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Tuesday, 18 February 2025

Smileband news

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

On February 17, 2025, Delta Air Lines Flight 4819, operated by Endeavor Air, experienced a catastrophic landing at Toronto Pearson International Airport. The aircraft, a Bombardier CRJ900, was en route from Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport when it crashed upon landing, flipping upside down and catching fire. Miraculously, all 80 passengers and crew survived, though 18 individuals sustained injuries, with three reported in critical condition.

Passenger John Nelson recounted the harrowing experience, noting that the runways were in “weird condition” due to gusty winds and blown snow. He described the plane hitting the ground “super hard,” skidding sideways before flipping over, and witnessing a fireball on the left side of the aircraft.

Dramatic footage captured the chaotic aftermath, showing the overturned aircraft engulfed in flames as passengers evacuated. Emergency responders swiftly arrived on the scene, extinguishing the fire and assisting in the evacuation process. Despite the severity of the crash, there were no fatalities.

The cause of the crash is currently under investigation by the Transportation Safety Board of Canada and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board. While the exact cause remains undetermined, factors such as landing gear issues and adverse weather conditions, including strong winds and recent snowfall, may have contributed to the accident.

This incident is the most significant aviation accident at Toronto Pearson International Airport since the 2005 Air France Flight 358 crash, where an Airbus A340 overran the runway and burst into flames; all 309 passengers and crew survived that accident as well.

Delta Air Lines has stated that they are cooperating fully with the investigation and are committed to supporting the affected passengers and crew during this time.

Key Points on the Toronto Plane Crash

• Incident Details: Delta Air Lines Flight 4819, operated by Endeavor Air, crashed while landing at Toronto Pearson International Airport on February 17, 2025.

• Aircraft & Route: The aircraft was a Bombardier CRJ900, flying from Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport to Toronto.

• Crash & Fire: The plane flipped upside down upon landing and caught fire.

• Survivors & Injuries: All 80 passengers and crew survived, but 18 were injured, including three critically.

• Passenger Accounts: Witnesses reported “weird” runway conditions, heavy impact, skidding, and a fireball.

• Emergency Response: Firefighters quickly extinguished the flames, and passengers evacuated safely.

• Possible Causes: The crash is under investigation, with landing gear issues, strong winds, and snow among the potential factors.

• Historical Context: This was the most severe crash at Toronto Pearson since Air France Flight 358 (2005), where all 309 people survived.

• Delta’s Response: The airline is cooperating with authorities and assisting passengers.

• Investigation Ongoing: The Transportation Safety Board of Canada and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board are leading the inquiry.

Conclusion

The Toronto plane crash involving Delta Air Lines Flight 4819 was a terrifying but miraculous incident, as all 80 passengers and crew survived despite the aircraft flipping upside down and catching fire. While adverse weather conditions and possible landing gear issues are being considered as contributing factors, a full investigation by aviation authorities is underway to determine the exact cause.

The swift response from emergency crews helped prevent fatalities, highlighting the importance of airport safety protocols and training. As Delta Air Lines cooperates with the investigation, passengers and industry experts await further insights into how such accidents can be prevented in the future.

Attached is a news article regarding the plane crash in Toronto

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14409013/amp/Exact-moment-Delta-plane-skidded-landing-clipped-wing-exploded-entire-aircraft-flipped-captured-dramatic-new-footage.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

In a recent development, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has declined a proposal from U.S. President Donald Trump, which sought $500 billion worth of Ukraine’s rare earth minerals as compensation for American aid. Zelenskyy cited the absence of concrete security guarantees for Ukraine as a primary reason for rejecting the offer.

The U.S. proposal aimed to acquire 50% of Ukraine’s critical mineral resources, including lithium, titanium, and rare earth elements, which are essential for various industries such as defense and technology. This move is part of a broader strategy to reduce Western dependence on Chinese mineral supplies.

White House National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes criticized Zelenskyy’s decision, describing it as “short-sighted” and emphasizing the importance of economic ties with the U.S. for Ukraine’s future security. Despite the initial rejection, Ukraine is preparing a counter-proposal to present to the U.S., aiming to secure both investment and security assurances.

This development occurs amidst U.S.-Russia peace talks in Saudi Arabia, from which Ukraine has been notably excluded. European leaders have expressed concern over their exclusion and are advocating for a unified response, increased defense spending, and greater military independence. Former NATO official Stefanie Babst criticized President Trump for abandoning traditional U.S.-European alliances and aligning more closely with Russia.

Ukraine possesses significant reserves of critical minerals, with estimates suggesting it holds about 10% of the world’s lithium reserves, along with substantial deposits of titanium, uranium, and graphite. However, many of these assessments are based on outdated Soviet-era data, and contemporary evaluations are lacking.

The exploitation of these resources faces challenges, including Russian control over parts of Ukraine’s mineral-rich territories, bureaucratic hurdles, and ongoing conflicts affecting mining operations. As the situation develops, Ukraine seeks to balance the need for foreign investment with the imperative of securing its national interests and sovereignty.

Key Points: Zelenskyy Rejects Trump’s $500 Billion Bid for Ukraine’s Natural Resources

• Proposal Rejected: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy declined a proposal from Donald Trump, which sought $500 billion worth of Ukraine’s rare earth minerals in exchange for continued U.S. aid.

• Security Concerns: Zelenskyy rejected the deal primarily due to the lack of concrete security guarantees for Ukraine.

• U.S. Interest in Minerals: The deal aimed to secure 50% of Ukraine’s critical mineral resources, including lithium, titanium, and rare earth elements, which are vital for defense and technology industries.

• Western Strategy: The U.S. is looking to reduce reliance on China for rare minerals, making Ukraine’s resources strategically important.

• White House Response: A U.S. National Security Council spokesperson called the rejection “short-sighted,” stressing the importance of economic ties for Ukraine’s security.

• Ukraine’s Counter-Proposal: Ukraine is working on an alternative deal that would ensure both investment and security assurances.

• Geopolitical Context: The rejection comes amid U.S.-Russia peace talks in Saudi Arabia, where Ukraine has been excluded, raising concerns among European leaders.

• European Reaction: NATO officials and European leaders are worried about Trump’s distancing from traditional U.S.-European alliances and his perceived alignment with Russia.

• Ukraine’s Mineral Wealth: Ukraine is estimated to hold around 10% of the world’s lithium reserves, along with significant titanium, uranium, and graphite deposits, though many figures are based on outdated Soviet-era data.

• Challenges to Exploitation: Russian control over mineral-rich areas, bureaucratic issues, and the ongoing war hinder Ukraine’s ability to fully capitalize on its resources.

Conclusion

President Zelenskyy’s rejection of Trump’s $500 billion bid for Ukraine’s natural resources highlights the complex intersection of geopolitics, security, and economic interests. While the U.S. seeks to secure critical minerals to reduce dependence on China, Ukraine remains focused on preserving its sovereignty and ensuring long-term security guarantees rather than engaging in short-term economic deals.

The decision also underscores shifting global alliances, with Trump’s administration appearing to pivot away from traditional European partners while engaging in diplomatic talks that exclude Ukraine. As Kyiv works on a counter-proposal, the outcome will shape not only Ukraine’s economic future but also its strategic position in the global energy and defense landscape.

Attached is a news article regarding trump bid for 500bn of Ukraine natural resources

https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/world/story/donald-trump-ukraine-rare-earth-minerals-zelenskyy-ukraine-war-vladimir-putin-russia-peace-negotiations-2681622-2025-02-18

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Monday, 17 February 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

In a tragic medical incident in France, a woman underwent an abortion procedure and subsequently faced severe complications leading to the amputation of all four limbs. The case, reported in 2014, highlights the potential risks associated with medical procedures and the critical importance of prompt and effective medical intervention.

The woman, whose identity remains confidential, sought medical assistance for an abortion. Following the procedure, she developed a severe infection that rapidly progressed to septicemia, a life-threatening condition caused by the body’s response to a severe infection. The septicemia led to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), a condition causing blood clots to form throughout the body, which can block small blood vessels. As a result, the blood flow to her extremities was compromised, leading to tissue death. To save her life, doctors made the difficult decision to amputate both her arms and legs.

This case underscores the necessity for immediate medical attention when post-operative complications arise. Septicemia and DIC are medical emergencies that require swift diagnosis and treatment to prevent severe outcomes such as organ failure or limb amputations.

While such severe complications are rare, this incident serves as a poignant reminder of the potential risks inherent in medical procedures. It also highlights the importance of patient education regarding the signs of post-operative infections, such as high fever, severe pain, or unusual discharge, so they can seek timely medical care.

In the aftermath of this tragedy, discussions about medical protocols, patient monitoring, and the quality of post-operative care have been brought to the forefront, emphasizing the need for continuous improvements in healthcare practices to prevent similar incidents in the future.

It’s essential to recognize that while medical procedures carry inherent risks, they are generally safe when performed under appropriate medical supervision with proper post-operative care. Patients are encouraged to maintain open communication with their healthcare providers and promptly report any concerning symptoms following medical procedures.

• Medical Incident: A woman in France went to the hospital for an abortion and later suffered severe complications.

• Septicemia and DIC: She developed a life-threatening infection (septicemia), leading to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which caused blood clots and restricted blood flow.

• Amputation: Due to tissue death in her limbs, doctors had to amputate both her arms and legs to save her life.

• Post-Operative Risks: The case highlights the rare but serious risks of medical procedures and the importance of early detection of infections.

• Healthcare Protocols: The incident sparked discussions on improving patient monitoring, infection control, and post-operative care.

• Patient Awareness: Patients should be educated on recognizing infection symptoms like high fever, severe pain, or unusual discharge to seek timely medical help.

This tragic case underscores the importance of vigilant post-operative care and early intervention in medical complications. While severe outcomes like this are rare, they highlight the critical need for strict infection control measures, improved patient monitoring, and better awareness of post-surgical risks. It also raises questions about medical protocols and whether more could have been done to prevent such a devastating outcome. Moving forward, both healthcare providers and patients must remain proactive in recognizing and addressing potential complications to ensure better safety and care in medical procedures.

Attached is a news article regarding a women how went in to hospital to have a abortion and ended up have her legs and arms amputated

https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-florida-sepsis-amputee-20171105-story.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Pope Francis, aged 88, has been hospitalized at Rome’s Gemelli Hospital since Friday, February 14, 2025, due to a polymicrobial respiratory tract infection. This complex infection, involving multiple microorganisms, has necessitated an extended hospital stay and adjustments to his treatment regimen.

Initially admitted for bronchitis, the Pope’s condition evolved into a more severe respiratory infection. Despite initial stability, his health has required continuous medical attention, leading to the cancellation of his general audience scheduled for Wednesday.

Throughout his hospitalization, Pope Francis has maintained communication with the Catholic community, including daily phone calls to Gaza’s Holy Family Church. He has also expressed gratitude for the public’s prayers and support during this challenging time.

The Vatican has not provided a specific timeline for the Pope’s discharge, stating that he will remain hospitalized as long as necessary to address the “complex clinical situation.”

Pope Francis has faced several health challenges in recent years, including a partial lung removal in his youth, colon surgery in 2021, and treatment for bronchitis in 2023. Despite these issues, he has continued to fulfill his papal duties with resilience and dedication.

• Hospitalization: Pope Francis, 88, has been in Rome’s Gemelli Hospital since February 14, 2025, due to a polymicrobial respiratory tract infection.

• Condition: Initially admitted for bronchitis, but his condition worsened into a more complex respiratory infection.

• Medical Response: Doctors are closely monitoring him, and no discharge date has been confirmed.

• Public Engagement: Despite being in the hospital, he remains in contact with the Catholic community, making daily phone calls to Gaza’s Holy Family Church.

• Health History: Pope Francis has a history of respiratory issues, including a partial lung removal in his youth and previous colon and bronchitis treatments.

• Vatican Statement: The Pope will stay in the hospital for as long as necessary due to the “complex clinical situation.”

Pope Francis’s hospitalization underscores the challenges of his advancing age and ongoing health struggles. While his condition has been described as complex, his resilience and continued engagement with the Catholic community reflect his enduring commitment to his role. As the Vatican closely monitors his recovery, the global Catholic faithful remain hopeful for his swift return to health. His past ability to bounce back from medical issues suggests that, with proper care, he may once again resume his papal duties in due time.

Attached is a news article regarding pope Francis in hospital

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/17/pope-francis-to-stay-in-hospital-because-of-complex-clinical-picture

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley