Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Edgar Charles Frederick, a 79-year-old retired British banker from Poole, Dorset, was tragically killed in Nairobi, Kenya, after being struck by a vehicle in President William Ruto’s motorcade. The incident occurred as Frederick stepped onto a road that had been cleared for the high-speed convoy. The vehicle did not stop following the collision, and the driver was subsequently arrested and released on bail.  

Frederick had been visiting his sister and nephew in Kenya at the time of the accident. He was known for his extensive charitable work, having raised hundreds of thousands of pounds for overseas Christian aid over the past 35 years. His philanthropic efforts included building a school in Kenya and organizing various fundraising events, such as talent shows, quiz nights, and sponsored walks for clean water projects in Ethiopia. In 2019, Frederick received a papal blessing from Pope Francis in recognition of his fundraising endeavors.  

The Foreign Office has expressed its support for Frederick’s family during this difficult time, stating, “We are supporting the family of a British man who died in Kenya and are in contact with the local authorities.” The Kenyan National Police Service has launched an investigation into the incident and is urging witnesses to come forward. They have also called on all road users, including pedestrians, to exercise extreme caution to prevent accidents.  

Road accidents remain a significant concern in Kenya, with over 3,000 fatalities annually attributed to factors such as poor road conditions, unsafe vehicles, speeding, and reckless driving. The government has pledged to address these issues, especially following high-profile incidents like the death of marathon world record holder Kevin Kiptum and his coach in central Kenya last year.  

Frederick’s tragic death has cast a spotlight on the dangers associated with high-speed motorcades and the broader challenges of road safety in Kenya. His legacy of philanthropy and dedication to improving lives in Africa will be remembered by many.

• Victim: Edgar Charles Frederick, a 79-year-old retired British banker from Poole, Dorset.

• Incident: Struck and killed by a vehicle in President William Ruto’s motorcade in Nairobi, Kenya.

• Circumstances: He stepped onto a cleared road; the vehicle did not stop; the driver was arrested and later released on bail.

• Charity Work: Raised hundreds of thousands of pounds for Christian aid over 35 years, built a school in Kenya, and supported clean water projects in Ethiopia.

• Recognition: Received a papal blessing from Pope Francis in 2019 for his philanthropic work.

• Family Support: The UK Foreign Office is assisting his family.

• Investigation: Kenyan authorities are looking into the accident, urging witnesses to come forward.

• Road Safety in Kenya: Over 3,000 annual road deaths, with concerns over speeding and reckless driving.

• Broader Impact: Highlights risks of high-speed motorcades and road safety issues in Kenya.

Edgar Charles Frederick’s tragic death has brought attention to the dangers of high-speed motorcades and broader road safety issues in Kenya. While authorities investigate the incident, his legacy as a dedicated philanthropist who worked tirelessly to improve lives in Africa will not be forgotten. His contributions, from building schools to funding clean water projects, have left a lasting impact. As his family grieves, the tragedy serves as a reminder of the urgent need for stricter road safety measures to prevent further loss of life.

Attached is a news article regarding a banker killed in a bike crash in Kenya with the president 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y05p07gdjo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Donald Trump’s Travel Ban: A Controversial Legacy

Donald Trump’s travel ban, formally known as Executive Order 13769, was one of the most controversial policies of his presidency. Announced in January 2017, just days after Trump took office, the order temporarily restricted travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. The policy, framed as a national security measure, sparked global outrage, legal challenges, and protests across the United States.

The Rationale Behind the Ban

Trump justified the executive order as a way to prevent terrorism, claiming that stricter vetting was necessary to protect American citizens. His administration argued that these countries either harbored terrorists or lacked proper vetting procedures. However, critics pointed out that no major terrorist attacks on U.S. soil had been committed by individuals from these nations, raising questions about the policy’s effectiveness and true intent.

Legal Battles and Revisions

The original order was met with immediate legal challenges. Judges blocked its enforcement, citing violations of constitutional rights and religious discrimination. In response, the Trump administration issued a revised version in March 2017, removing Iraq from the list and making other modifications to withstand judicial scrutiny.

A third version of the ban, issued in September 2017, added North Korea, Chad, and certain Venezuelan officials while removing Sudan. This version was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2018 in a 5-4 decision, ruling that the president had broad authority over immigration policy.

Impact and Criticism

The travel ban led to confusion and chaos at airports, as travelers with valid visas were detained or turned away. Families were separated, students and workers faced uncertainty, and refugees were denied entry. Civil rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), condemned the ban as discriminatory and based on religious bias, pointing to Trump’s previous campaign promise of a “Muslim ban.”

Opponents also argued that the ban harmed America’s global reputation and diplomatic relations, particularly with Muslim-majority nations. Human rights organizations pointed out that it disproportionately affected vulnerable populations, including those fleeing war and persecution.

Biden’s Reversal

One of Joe Biden’s first actions as president was to repeal the travel ban on January 20, 2021, calling it “a stain on our national conscience.” His administration moved to restore normal visa processing and prioritize a more inclusive immigration policy.

Conclusion

Trump’s travel ban remains a defining moment of his presidency, illustrating his hardline stance on immigration and national security. While his supporters viewed it as a necessary step to protect Americans, critics saw it as an unconstitutional attack on religious freedom and a departure from America’s values as a nation of immigrants. Even after its repeal, the policy continues to fuel debates about the balance between security and civil liberties in U.S. immigration law.

Attached is a news article regarding Donald Trump travel ban 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-weighs-travel-ban-dozens-countries-memo-says-2025-03-15/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tragic End for Trafficked Mother Who Died in Cyprus Nightclub

A mother who was trafficked to Cyprus under the false promise of a job has died in a nightclub after being forced into sexual slavery. The woman, whose identity has not been disclosed, was reportedly lured from her home country with the hope of a better future but instead became a victim of human trafficking.

According to local sources, the woman had been recruited by a criminal network that preys on vulnerable individuals, offering them work abroad as waitresses, cleaners, or other legitimate professions. However, upon arriving in Cyprus, she was stripped of her passport, threatened, and forced into prostitution.

Witnesses at the nightclub reported that she collapsed on the premises late at night. Emergency services were called, but she was pronounced dead at the scene. The cause of death has not yet been confirmed, but authorities are investigating whether she was subjected to physical abuse or forced drug use—common tactics used by traffickers to control their victims.

Cyprus, like many other European countries, has been a hotspot for human trafficking, with women from Eastern Europe, Africa, and Asia often falling prey to these ruthless networks. NGOs working in the region have long warned about the lack of effective protections for victims and the failure of authorities to crack down on traffickers operating with impunity.

The woman’s tragic death has reignited calls for stronger anti-trafficking measures and better support for victims who manage to escape. Advocacy groups are urging Cypriot authorities to take decisive action against the criminal rings that exploit vulnerable individuals for profit.

As investigations continue, campaigners stress that her case is not an isolated incident but part of a much wider crisis that demands urgent attention.

• Lured by Fake Job Offer: The woman was trafficked to Cyprus under the false promise of legitimate employment.

• Forced into Prostitution: Upon arrival, she was stripped of her passport, threatened, and coerced into sexual slavery.

• Died in Nightclub: She collapsed at a nightclub, with emergency services pronouncing her dead at the scene.

• Possible Causes of Death: Authorities are investigating whether she suffered abuse or was forced to take drugs.

• Human Trafficking Crisis: Cyprus has been identified as a hotspot for trafficking, with criminal networks exploiting vulnerable women.

• Calls for Action: NGOs and advocacy groups urge stronger anti-trafficking measures and better victim support.

• Ongoing Investigation: Authorities are under pressure to dismantle trafficking rings operating in the region.

The tragic death of this trafficked mother highlights the brutal reality of human trafficking in Cyprus and beyond. Her story is a stark reminder of the exploitation faced by countless women who are deceived and forced into sexual slavery. While authorities investigate the circumstances surrounding her death, activists stress that urgent action is needed to dismantle trafficking networks, protect vulnerable individuals, and provide real support for victims. Without stronger enforcement and international cooperation, tragedies like this will continue to occur, leaving countless lives destroyed in the shadows of a global crisis.

Attached is a news article regarding a sex slave who died in a night club, was lured to Cyprus for a fake job and was forced to do prostitution 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/tragic-married-mum-one-24-34838858.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

In a recent court proceeding, 43-year-old Damion Ogeare pleaded guilty to charges of sexually abusing a Shetland pony and trespassing with intent to commit a sexual offence. The incident occurred on January 24 of the previous year at a farm in Trowbridge, Wiltshire.  

Ogeare was apprehended after the pony’s owner observed him entering the stable on CCTV footage. The video showed Ogeare entering the stable partially clothed and leaving naked approximately ten minutes later. DNA evidence collected from the scene led to his identification and subsequent arrest.  

Following his guilty plea at Salisbury Crown Court, Ogeare was released on bail pending a pre-sentence report. He is scheduled to be sentenced in May.  

This case has attracted significant attention due to the nature of the offence and the breach of trust involved in trespassing onto private property to commit such an act. The legal proceedings highlight the seriousness with which the judicial system treats offences involving sexual misconduct and animal abuse.

• Defendant: Damion Ogeare, 43, pleaded guilty in Salisbury Crown Court.

• Charges: Sexual abuse of a Shetland pony and trespassing with intent to commit a sexual offence.

• Incident: Occurred on January 24, 2023, at a farm in Trowbridge, Wiltshire.

• Evidence: CCTV footage captured Ogeare entering the stable partially clothed and leaving naked 10 minutes later; DNA evidence confirmed his involvement.

• Legal Proceedings: Released on bail pending a pre-sentence report; sentencing scheduled for May.

• Significance: Case highlights serious judicial approach to animal abuse and sexual misconduct.

The case of Damion Ogeare underscores the severity with which the justice system treats offences involving sexual misconduct and animal abuse. His guilty plea, supported by clear CCTV and DNA evidence, ensures that he will face appropriate legal consequences. As the court prepares for sentencing in May, the case serves as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance in protecting animals from such disturbing crimes.

Attached is a news article regarding the man who abused a Shetland pony and pleaded guilty in court 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14494255/amp/Man-admits-having-sex-Shetland-pony.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

In a recent episode of “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” British boxers Chris Eubank Jr. and Conor Benn engaged in a heated exchange that underscored their escalating rivalry ahead of their scheduled bout on April 26, 2025, at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.  

The interview quickly became contentious, with both fighters trading personal insults. The animosity reached a point where security personnel had to intervene multiple times to prevent a physical altercation. A notable moment occurred when Eubank Jr. refused to shake Benn’s hand, despite Benn’s willingness to do so when prompted by host Piers Morgan.  

The roots of this tension trace back to an incident during a previous press conference where Eubank Jr. smashed an egg into Benn’s face, referencing Benn’s failed drug test in 2022. This act not only intensified their feud but also led to a confrontation involving Benn’s father, Nigel Benn, and a significant fine for Eubank Jr.  

During the interview, Eubank Jr. expressed skepticism about Benn’s explanation for his failed drug tests, where Benn claimed the positive results were due to excessive egg consumption. This skepticism led to a particularly intense exchange, culminating in Eubank Jr. abruptly walking out of the interview.  

The rivalry between Eubank Jr. and Benn is deeply rooted in their family histories. Their fathers, Chris Eubank Sr. and Nigel Benn, had a storied rivalry in the 1990s, with two major bouts that resulted in one victory for Eubank Sr. and a split draw. This legacy adds an extra layer of intensity to the upcoming fight between their sons.  

Key Points from the Chris Eubank Jr. & Conor Benn Interview with Piers Morgan:

1. Heated Exchange – The interview was filled with personal insults and tensions, requiring security to step in multiple times.

2. Handshake Refusal – Chris Eubank Jr. refused to shake Conor Benn’s hand, despite Benn offering one when prompted by Piers Morgan.

3. Egg Incident & Rivalry – Eubank Jr. previously smashed an egg into Benn’s face, mocking Benn’s failed drug test in 2022, which he attributed to excessive egg consumption.

4. Walkout Moment – Eubank Jr. eventually walked out of the interview after an intense exchange regarding Benn’s doping controversy.

5. Family Feud – The animosity stems from their fathers’ famous boxing rivalry in the 1990s (Chris Eubank Sr. vs. Nigel Benn), adding extra weight to their upcoming fight.

6. Upcoming Fight – The two will settle their rivalry in the ring on April 26, 2025, at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

Conclusion

The fiery interview between Chris Eubank Jr. and Conor Benn on Piers Morgan Uncensored has only intensified anticipation for their upcoming fight on April 26, 2025. Their longstanding personal and family rivalry was on full display, with heated exchanges, a handshake snub, and even a dramatic walkout. The bad blood between them, fueled by past controversies like Benn’s failed drug test and Eubank Jr.’s infamous egg stunt, has turned their clash into one of the most highly anticipated boxing showdowns in recent years. With tensions at an all-time high, their bout at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium promises to be as explosive as their war of words.

Attached is a news article regarding Conner benn and Chris Eubanks headed exchange 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/boxing/2022/12/17/exclusive-conor-benn-submits-270-page-document-clear-name-failed/?WT.mc_id=tmgoff_psc_ppc_google_core_pmax_broad_pmax_content_DSA_BrandExclusions&rm_id=RM_News_UK_Pmax_Ads_Bau_Core_DSA_Exclusions&gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAADAty5BE-h_jIklIQrZDS_M0fM1RC

 Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Infected Blood Inquiry has been a pivotal development in addressing one of the gravest healthcare disasters in UK history. During the 1970s and 1980s, thousands of individuals, primarily haemophiliacs, were infected with HIV and hepatitis C through contaminated blood products provided by the National Health Service (NHS). This tragedy led to over 3,000 deaths and left many others grappling with lifelong health complications.  

The scandal’s origins trace back to the NHS’s reliance on imported blood products, notably factor VIII and factor IX concentrates used to treat haemophilia. These products were often sourced from high-risk donors, including prisoners and individuals with substance abuse issues, leading to widespread contamination.  

In response to mounting pressure from victims and their families, the UK government initiated the Infected Blood Inquiry in 2017. Chaired by Sir Brian Langstaff, the inquiry sought to uncover the circumstances that led to the distribution of contaminated blood products and to determine accountability. The final report, published in May 2024, concluded that the disaster was largely avoidable and that there was a systematic failure to protect patients, accompanied by attempts to conceal the truth.  

Following the inquiry’s findings, the government established the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme in August 2024, allocating £11.8 billion to compensate victims and their families. This scheme marked a significant step towards acknowledging the suffering endured by those affected. However, the implementation has faced criticism due to delays in disbursing funds. As of December 2024, only 10 out of approximately 4,000 victims had received compensation, leading to frustration among campaigners and survivors.  

The compensation scheme is designed to provide financial redress to both living victims and the estates of deceased individuals. It includes provisions for injury impact awards, social impact awards, autonomy awards, and compensation for past financial losses. Despite these comprehensive measures, the slow pace of payments has left many feeling in limbo, exacerbating the anguish of those who have already endured decades of hardship. 

The government’s commitment to expedite the compensation process is crucial. Victims and their advocates continue to call for timely action to ensure that those affected receive the justice and support they deserve without further delay. The reactivation of the inquiry to scrutinize the compensation scheme underscores the ongoing challenges in addressing this tragic chapter of the NHS’s history.  

Background of the Scandal

• Thousands of people, primarily haemophiliacs, were infected with HIV and hepatitis C through contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s.

• The NHS sourced blood products from high-risk donors (e.g., prisoners and drug users), leading to widespread infections.

• Over 3,000 people died, and many more suffered lifelong health issues.

The Infected Blood Inquiry

• Launched in 2017, chaired by Sir Brian Langstaff.

• Investigated government and NHS accountability for the disaster.

• Final report in May 2024 found the scandal was avoidable and involved cover-ups.

Compensation Scheme

• UK government announced an £11.8 billion compensation fund in August 2024.

• Victims and families were promised financial redress, including payments for:

• Injury impact

• Social and autonomy impact

• Past financial losses

Delays in Compensation

• As of December 2024, only 10 out of 4,000 victims had received compensation.

• Delays led to frustration among survivors and campaigners.

• The government has been urged to speed up the process.

Ongoing Issues

• The inquiry is being reactivated to scrutinize the slow compensation rollout.

• Victims are still awaiting justice and financial support decades after the scandal.

Conclusion

The Infected Blood Inquiry has shed light on one of the most devastating healthcare scandals in UK history, revealing systemic failures and deliberate cover-ups that led to the infection of thousands with HIV and hepatitis C. While the government’s £11.8 billion compensation scheme is a significant step towards justice, the delays in payouts have left many victims and their families frustrated and disheartened.

With only a handful of victims receiving compensation, campaigners continue to demand urgent action to ensure survivors are not forced to wait any longer for the financial and moral redress they deserve. The reactivation of the inquiry to monitor the slow rollout of funds highlights the ongoing challenges in addressing this tragic chapter of the NHS’s history.

For the victims, time is running out. The government must act swiftly to deliver justice before it is too late.

Attached is a news article regarding the NHS infected blood claim inquiry 

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/organisations-criticise-compensation-delays-as-infected-blood-inquiry-publishes-new-evidence-13327723

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

On March 13, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump met with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the White House to discuss pressing international security matters. The meeting underscored the United States’ commitment to strengthening the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and addressing contemporary geopolitical challenges.

Enhancing NATO’s Defense Capabilities

A central theme of the discussion was the enhancement of NATO’s defense spending. Secretary General Rutte praised President Trump’s efforts in motivating alliance members to increase their defense budgets. He highlighted that, under Trump’s leadership, NATO nations have collectively augmented their military expenditures, with countries like Germany and the United Kingdom committing to significant boosts in their defense budgets. Rutte remarked that these contributions are pivotal for adapting to evolving security threats and ensuring the alliance’s readiness.  

President Trump reiterated the necessity for NATO members to meet and exceed the previously established defense spending target of 2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP). He proposed that members aim for a 5% contribution, emphasizing that such investments are crucial for maintaining NATO’s strength and deterrence capabilities.  

Addressing the Ukraine-Russia Conflict

The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia was another focal point of the meeting. President Trump disclosed that the United States has engaged in discussions with Ukraine regarding potential territorial concessions as part of a peace agreement with Russia. Specifically, the status of the Zaporizhzhia power plant, currently under Russian control, was addressed. Trump acknowledged Ukraine’s acceptance of a 30-day ceasefire and noted that U.S. diplomats are actively negotiating in Moscow to facilitate a peaceful resolution.  

However, Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed reservations about the proposed ceasefire, suggesting that it might allow Ukraine to regroup and strengthen its military forces. Putin’s concerns indicate potential challenges ahead in securing a lasting peace agreement.  

Strategic Interests in Greenland

In a surprising turn, President Trump reiterated his interest in annexing Greenland to the United States, citing national security reasons. During the meeting, he stated, “We have to do it,” emphasizing that such an acquisition would bolster both U.S. and international security. While Secretary General Rutte did not directly address the annexation proposal, he acknowledged the Arctic’s strategic importance, especially considering the increasing influence of Russia and China in the region. Trump also mentioned plans to acquire 48 new icebreakers, with support from Canada, to enhance Arctic operations.  

Conclusion

The meeting between President Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte highlighted the United States’ ongoing commitment to reinforcing NATO’s capabilities and addressing global security challenges. Discussions encompassed a range of topics, from increasing defense spending among member nations to navigating complex geopolitical issues like the Ukraine-Russia conflict and the strategic significance of Greenland. As the international landscape continues to evolve, such dialogues are essential for ensuring the alliance’s adaptability and resilience.

Attached is a news article regarding trump and mark rutte nato leader hold a meeting 

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_233821.htm

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

In a significant development aimed at de-escalating the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed conditional support for a U.S.-proposed 30-day ceasefire. This proposal, initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump, seeks to halt hostilities and pave the way for comprehensive peace negotiations.

During a recent press conference at the Kremlin alongside Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, Putin acknowledged the ceasefire proposal but underscored the necessity of addressing the fundamental issues underlying the conflict. He emphasized that while Russia is amenable to a temporary cessation of hostilities, the ceasefire must lead to enduring peace and not merely serve as a pause in the fighting. Putin stated, “Several details need to be sorted out,” highlighting the complexity of the situation and the importance of ensuring that any agreement effectively resolves the root causes of the crisis.  

The U.S. proposal comes amid ongoing diplomatic efforts to resolve a conflict that has persisted since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. President Trump expressed optimism about Russia’s potential response, stating his hope that Russia “will do the right thing.” He also engaged in discussions with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte to garner support for the ceasefire initiative.  

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has welcomed the U.S. proposal, emphasizing the urgency of moving swiftly towards peace. However, he has also accused Russia of delaying its response to the ceasefire offer, expressing concerns that any postponement could lead to further escalation and loss of life.  

Despite these diplomatic overtures, challenges remain. Observers have noted that both Russia and Ukraine might use the ceasefire period to regroup and rearm, potentially prolonging the conflict. Additionally, Russia has firmly rejected the involvement of NATO peacekeepers, complicating efforts to establish a neutral monitoring force to oversee the ceasefire’s implementation.  

The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, with various nations expressing cautious optimism about the potential for a ceasefire. The success of this initiative largely depends on the willingness of all parties to engage in sincere negotiations and make the necessary concessions to achieve lasting peace in the region.

1. Putin’s Agreement in Principle – Russian President Vladimir Putin has conditionally agreed to a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine, based on a U.S.-led proposal.

2. Concerns About Ceasefire Terms – While supporting the idea, Putin emphasized that fundamental issues must be addressed to ensure long-term peace rather than a temporary pause in fighting.

3. U.S. and NATO Involvement – The ceasefire initiative was pushed by U.S. President Donald Trump, who expressed hope that Russia would accept the proposal. Trump also discussed the plan with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.

4. Ukraine’s Response – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy welcomed the ceasefire proposal but accused Russia of delaying its response, warning that delays could lead to more escalation.

5. Concerns Over Military Strategies – Analysts worry that both Russia and Ukraine could use the ceasefire to regroup and rearm, potentially prolonging the conflict.

6. Russia Rejects NATO Peacekeepers – Moscow has firmly opposed NATO peacekeepers monitoring the ceasefire, complicating efforts for neutral oversight.

7. International Reactions – The global community is watching closely, with cautious optimism, but concerns remain about whether this will lead to lasting peace or just a temporary break in the conflict.

The ceasefire proposal marks a potential turning point in the ongoing Ukraine conflict, but its success hinges on genuine commitment from all sides. While Putin’s conditional acceptance signals a willingness to engage in diplomacy, his insistence on addressing broader security concerns suggests that peace is still a distant goal. Ukraine’s cautious optimism is tempered by fears of Russian stalling tactics, and the rejection of NATO peacekeepers complicates enforcement efforts. Ultimately, whether this ceasefire leads to lasting peace or merely serves as a temporary lull will depend on the sincerity of negotiations and the ability of international mediators to secure a meaningful resolution.

Attached is a news article regarding Putin peace ceasefire deal condition 

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/liveblog/2025/3/13/russia-ukraine-war-live-news-us-negotiators-to-set-out-truce-plan

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Bruce Willis Battles Aphasia: Hollywood Icon Struggles to Speak

Bruce Willis, the legendary action star known for his roles in Die Hard, Pulp Fiction, and The Sixth Sense, is facing a devastating health battle. The 69-year-old actor has been diagnosed with aphasia, a condition that affects a person’s ability to speak, write, and understand language. His family announced the diagnosis in 2022, revealing that his condition has since progressed, forcing him to retire from acting.

What Is Aphasia

Aphasia is a neurological disorder often caused by a stroke, brain injury, or progressive disease. It impacts the brain’s language-processing centers, making communication difficult. In Willis’s case, his condition has worsened, leading to frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a rare and degenerative brain disorder that further affects speech, behavior, and cognitive function.

A Slow and Heartbreaking Decline

Willis’s family, including his wife, Emma Heming Willis, and ex-wife, Demi Moore, have been open about his struggles. Heming Willis has been an advocate for raising awareness about FTD, often sharing updates about her husband’s condition. She has described the process as “painful” but remains committed to supporting Willis through this challenging time.

Reports indicate that Willis’s ability to communicate has significantly declined. Close friends and colleagues have revealed that he can no longer engage in conversations as he once did, and even recognizing familiar faces has become difficult. Despite this, his family remains by his side, ensuring he is surrounded by love and care.

A Legacy That Will Never Fade

Though Bruce Willis has stepped away from the limelight, his impact on Hollywood remains undeniable. From his early days in Moonlighting to becoming one of the biggest action heroes of the ‘80s and ‘90s, his performances continue to captivate audiences worldwide.

As fans and the entertainment industry come to terms with his diagnosis, there is an outpouring of support for Willis and his family. Many have praised his contributions to film and television, celebrating his legacy while mourning the loss of his presence on screen.

Raising Awareness for FTD

Willis’s diagnosis has brought much-needed attention to frontotemporal dementia, a condition that is often misunderstood and under-researched. His family has encouraged others to learn more about FTD and support those affected by it. Organizations such as The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration (AFTD) continue to push for better research and treatments.

While Bruce Willis may no longer be able to speak as he once did, his work, charisma, and influence will always speak volumes. His legacy in Hollywood remains unshakable, and his battle with aphasia serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of awareness, research, and compassion.

Attached is a news article regarding Bruce Willis who has been diagnosed with aphasia 

https://www.itv.com/news/2022-03-30/what-causes-aphasia-and-is-it-a-treatable-condition

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by Smileband, 

Mark Harris, a 38-year-old banker formerly associated with Investec, has been charged with rape and sexual abuse following an alleged assault on a 25-year-old woman in her Midtown Manhattan apartment on February 25, 2025. According to prosecutors, Harris forcibly held the victim against a mattress and assaulted her, ignoring her repeated pleas to stop. The victim managed to fend off Harris by kicking him away. As he departed, Harris allegedly verbally abused her, stating, “You had this coming.”  

Harris was arrested and arraigned on charges of rape and sexual abuse in Manhattan Criminal Court on March 6, 2025. He was released on a $150,000 cash bail. His attorney, Jason Goldman, has asserted Harris’s innocence, stating that their investigation has uncovered evidence that will exonerate him.  

Professionally, Harris has an extensive background in the banking sector. He spent 11 years at Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC), where he served as the director of structured and project finance. In 2022, he transitioned to SMBC Nikko Securities before joining Investec, an international banking company, in August 2023. At Investec, he worked in energy and infrastructure finance and was involved in U.S. deals as a bookrunner. His tenure at Investec concluded in December 2024.  

Harris resides in a two-bedroom apartment in the upscale Brooklyn Point building in Downtown Brooklyn, with similar units recently selling for approximately $2.6 million.  

The case has attracted significant media attention, reflecting ongoing concerns about sexual violence and the conduct of professionals in positions of authority. Harris is scheduled to return to court on March 11, 2025, as the legal proceedings continue.

1. Incident Details

• Mark Harris, 38, allegedly raped a 25-year-old woman in her Midtown Manhattan apartment on February 25, 2025.

• Prosecutors say he pinned her down and ignored her repeated pleas to stop.

• The victim managed to push him away by kicking him.

• As he left, Harris allegedly told her, “You had this coming.”

2. Arrest & Charges

• Harris was arrested and arraigned in Manhattan Criminal Court on March 6, 2025.

• He faces charges of rape and sexual abuse.

• He was released on a $150,000 cash bail.

• His lawyer, Jason Goldman, claims he is innocent and will be exonerated.

3. Professional Background

• Harris has over a decade of experience in banking, working at Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) for 11 years.

• He later joined SMBC Nikko Securities in 2022 and moved to Investec in August 2023.

• He worked in energy and infrastructure finance before leaving Investec in December 2024.

4. Personal & Residence

• Harris lives in a luxury Brooklyn Point apartment in Downtown Brooklyn, where similar units sell for around $2.6 million.

5. Legal Proceedings

• The case has gained media attention amid concerns about sexual violence and corporate misconduct.

• Harris is due back in court on March 11, 2025.

The allegations against Mark Harris have drawn significant public attention, not only due to the severity of the charges but also because of his high-profile career in finance. As the legal process unfolds, the case raises broader concerns about accountability and misconduct among professionals in positions of power. While Harris’s defense maintains his innocence, the prosecution’s claims paint a troubling picture of the alleged incident. With a court appearance scheduled for March 11, the outcome of this case will be closely watched, both for its legal implications and its potential impact on corporate culture and public trust.

Attached is a news article regarding mark harris the banker who raped women in NYC apartment 

https://www.aol.com/news/ny-banker-charged-raping-woman-010101452.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAEF-noGDw4eLvOCxXdLjjiuHItdyk3hTd8cWlbscy6gJrCtmiQYa8KNqBiQ5B1a6T3U8sH6I5xxe9UmS_L1T-PcFGXj0Gewf4WYGJkmI-VU-u5cr_2WtxO65xJdpnWYr9ytf5Wo70IMf8YBuIApAVf8Pc4uXica-crakcQ3KNPP6

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/