Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

ITV News Joins Gwent Police in Operation Harley: Battling Illegal E‑Bike ‘Epidemic’

ITV News Wales reporter Rhys Williams embedded with Gwent Police on 10 July 2025, as part of Operation Harley—a targeted enforcement initiative responding to a growing wave of illegal and modified e‑bikes and scooters wreaking havoc across Newport. 

High-Speed Threats on Quiet Streets

Within minutes of rolling out, officers spotted an unregistered electric motorbike carrying two youths through a residential neighbourhood. It then veered onto a wooded footpath—evading both ground-level units and a high-flying drone. 

Speeds often top 50–70 mph, creating clearly illegal and perilous conditions for pedestrians, schools, and public spaces across Newport suburbs such as Bettws and Alway. Residents report constant disruption, with riders treating pavements and parks as racetracks. 

Seizure Powers Upgraded

A game-changing legal update now allows Gwent Police to crush seized e‑bikes and scooters within 48 hours, rather than the previous two-week wait. This rapid destruction aims to prevent confiscated machines from returning to circulation via black market resale or re-emergence. 

In the last 12 months, Gwent Police have removed nearly 150 illegal e‑bikes and off-road vehicles—a stark indicator of the scale of the problem. 

Difficulties of Enforcement

Catching offenders in real-time remains challenging. Sergeant Jason Ghalamkary noted that even aerial surveillance struggles to track riders once they disperse into side paths and back alleys—“like a needle in a haystack”

To build public trust and encourage intelligence sharing, Gwent Police have begun actively posting seizure stories on social media. Chief Supt Jason White hopes visibility will prompt community reporting and participation—“Once people see us in action, they’ll step up” 

Echoes from Other Regions

ITV News has reported other UK forces facing similar surges. In Exeter, police have removed 344 illegally modified e‑bikes and scooters in the past 12 months—accounts suggest these may be tied to organised crime and worker exploitation in the gig economy, complete with makeshift conversion kits allowing speeds up to 60 mph. 

Parallel concerns have led a UK parliamentary committee to call for urgent regulation reforms: tighter police seizure authorities, responsibility for online sales platforms listing high-wattage ‘off‑road only’ kits, and a scrappage scheme, particularly targeting delivery riders using illegal bikes. 

What’s at Stake—and What Needs to Change

• Safety at Risk: With speeds far exceeding legal limits (15.5 mph cap, 250 watt assist), these bikes endanger riders and vulnerable road users alike.

• Community Impact: Residents describe chaos in neighbourhoods and parks, especially at school times.

• Criminal Links: Products sold online—e‑bikes and conversion kits—are easy to obtain, untraceable, and sometimes connected to broader exploitation networks.

• Policy Gaps: Current UK laws fail to hold platform sellers accountable, and enforcement remains inconsistent nationally.

Key Takeaways

• ITV News’s coverage spotlights the real-time pressure on local police and communities from illegal e‑bike misuse.

• Gwent Police’s Operation Harley demonstrates proactive patrol tactics, drone surveillance, and faster seizure protocols.

• UK-wide concerns point to the need for stricter regulation, enforcement, and accountability, particularly around online retail and gig economy use.

• A public-aware strategy, combined with bold legal reforms, may be the only effective path to curbing this rising e‑bike crisis.

Suggested Calls to Action

• Expand seizure-to-scrappage powers nationally.

• Require online platforms to vet and remove listings that exceed legal e‑bike specifications.

• Promote police–community collaboration for reporting and neighborhood awareness campaigns.

Summary: ITV News’s ride-along with Gwent Police provides a revealing look at how illegal e‑bikes are creating public safety crises in UK communities. With powerful bikes zooming onto roads and pavements, law enforcement operations like Operation Harley are on the frontline—yet broader legal and policy shifts are urgently needed to curb what many are calling an “e‑bike epidemic.”

Attached is a News article regarding illegal e-bke that the police are on the hunt for as the epidemic 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwye84yj14lo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Iran Warns That a Drone May Strike Trump at Mar‑a‑Lago

In early July 2025, Mohammad‑Javad Larijani, a senior adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, made a chilling remark on Iranian state television suggesting that former U.S. President Donald Trump could be targeted by a drone strike at his Mar‑a‑Lago estate in Florida. Larijani stated:

“Trump has done something so that he can no longer sunbathe in Mar‑a‑Lago… As he lies there with his stomach to the sun, a small drone might hit him in the navel. It’s very simple.”  

Larijani’s comments were widely reported as either a symbolic provocation or as rhetorical escalation by Tehran’s leadership. The remark seemed to echo earlier threats and animosity, including the IRGC’s past vow of retribution following the U.S. drone strike that killed General Qasem Soleimani in 2020. 

The same narrative noted an online campaign called “Blood Pact”—reportedly raising over $40 million—seeking retribution against those perceived to insult Iran’s Supreme Leader, firing up further fears of real violence. 

Trump Responds: Shrugging Off the Threat

Reached at the White House, Trump downplayed the threat, joking that he hasn’t sunbathed since childhood. Reporting that he was “not too big into it,” he quipped:

“I guess it’s a threat. I’m not sure it’s a threat, actually, but perhaps it is.”  

Observers noted that Trump’s triumphal styling often includes spray-tanning, rather than actual sun exposure—elements that sparked satirical commentary on shows like The Daily Show. 

 

Context: Rising Tensions & Prior Threats

• The threat came about two weeks after the U.S. bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities. In response, Iran launched missile strikes against a U.S. base in Qatar—but with prior warning and minimal casualties.  

• Analysts view Larijani’s remarks as part of broader Iranian rhetoric to signal resistance—whether symbolic or intended literal threat—especially amid fundraising efforts by ideologically driven platforms.  

• The United States, along with international allies, has increased surveillance and counterterrorism vigilance—especially over so-called sleeper cells suspected to operate in Western countries, potentially activated in retaliation.  

• In November 2024, U.S. authorities charged individuals allegedly tied to an IRGC-backed plot to assassinate Trump. That case underscores the seriousness behind seemingly hyperbolic rhetoric. 

What Does It Mean

• While Larijani’s words were framed as jocular, they nonetheless reflect Iran’s posture toward Trump and its willingness to escalate rhetoric in retaliation for U.S. strikes and pressure campaigns.

• U.S. officials have not publicly confirmed any specific assassination plot tied to this threat. Still, the Secret Service, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security remain alert.  

• Diplomatically, the remarks complicate any potential talks: Iran has said it may resume cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, and both sides appear open to negotiations in Norway. 

• International watchdogs and advocacy groups have called for sanctions and travel bans targeting Iranian clerics and officials who promote violent rhetoric. 

Attached is a news article regarding Iran warns that a drone might strike trump at mar-a-lago 

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/irans-drone-strike-on-donald-trump-threat-his-not-too-big-into-reply-8859977/amp/1

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tragic Murder of LGBT Civil Partners by Adult‑Film Actor in London

Date of crime: July 8, 2024

Location: Shepherd’s Bush, West London

Victims: Civil partners Albert Alfonso, 62 (swimming instructor), and Paul Longworth, 71 (retired handyman)

Accused: Yostin Andrés Mosquera, 35, Colombian adult‑film actor

Status: Ongoing trial at the Old Bailey (early summer 2025)

Victims and Context

Albert Alfonso and Paul Longworth, described by neighbors as a kind and devoted gay couple, entered into a civil partnership in February 2023 after many years together. Those close to them said that while Albert engaged in paid adult‑film sexual encounters, Paul accepted this aspect of their relationship but did not participate in it. 

The Allegations

• Mosquera reportedly flew to London more than once for paid sexual encounters with Alfonso, and both men also visited him in Colombia earlier in 2024. 

• On July 8, 2024, investigators say Mosquera killed Paul Longworth with a hammer while Alfonso was at work, then stabbed Alfonso during a filmed sexual act.  

• Prosecutors allege that Mosquera dismembered the bodies, kept the victims’ heads in a freezer, and transported suitcases with their remains to the Clifton Suspension Bridge, where he attempted to dump them in Bristol. 

Evidence of Premeditation

Court testimony has revealed that in the weeks prior, Mosquera searched online for information such as house prices, serial killers in London, “Jack the Ripper film,” and even how to kill someone by targeting the head. Records also show he browsed Facebook Marketplace for a chest freezer and copied spreadsheets containing Alfonso’s bank credentials — suggesting financial motive and planning. 

Trial Proceedings

• Mosquera has admitted manslaughter in the death of Alfonso but denies the murder charges regarding both men, instead blaming Alfonso for Longworth’s death  .

• The prosecution asserts the killings were fully premeditated, motivated by theft and financial gain, and followed by a gruesome attempt to dispose of the bodies. 

The trial, held at the Old Bailey, is complex and expected to last multiple weeks into mid‑2025 

The Couple’s Legacy & Legal Importance

• Albert Alfonso was remembered fondly as a dedicated swimming instructor; Paul Longworth, a dyslexic retired handyman who relied on Alfonso. They were regarded as gentle, affectionate, and genuinely close. 

• Their brutal murders have drawn international attention, highlighting vulnerabilities faced by LGBT couples, especially involving financial exploitation and violence tied to sex work.

Summary

This tragic case involves the brutal murder of an LGBT couple by a figure from the adult‑film industry. It is marked by extreme violence, alleged premeditation, and elements of exploitation. With investigations still underway, the Old Bailey trial promises to illuminate not only the precise role Mosquera played in each death but the broader circumstances surrounding motive and culpability.

Attached is a news article regarding LGBT couple murdered by adult film actor 

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/adult-film-star-killed-uk-couple-dumped-their-body-parts-in-suitcases-8301351/amp/1

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Court Rules on Death Penalty for 9/11 Masterminds: Decades-Long Case Nears Conclusion

Washington D.C., July 12, 2025 — After nearly 24 years of legal battles, delays, and political debate, a U.S. military judge has ruled that the alleged masterminds behind the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks could face the death penalty if convicted. The decision comes as a landmark ruling in one of the most complex and high-profile legal proceedings in American history.

The five men at the center of the case, including self-proclaimed mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, have been held at Guantanamo Bay since their capture in the early 2000s. They face multiple charges, including terrorism, conspiracy, and nearly 3,000 counts of murder.

This week’s ruling by the military judge overseeing the case confirmed that the death penalty remains a possible sentence if the accused are found guilty. The decision has reignited national conversations about justice, closure for victims’ families, and the long-standing controversy surrounding the use of capital punishment in terrorism cases.

A Slow-Moving Trial

Since their capture, the five men have faced numerous pre-trial hearings, legal obstacles, and allegations of CIA torture, which complicated the admissibility of evidence. Legal experts have long criticized the U.S. government’s handling of the prosecution, pointing to secret interrogations, the use of waterboarding, and the extended time it has taken to bring the suspects to trial.

The recent ruling does not signal an immediate trial, but it does pave the way for the prosecution to seek the ultimate penalty. Families of 9/11 victims, many of whom have waited more than two decades for justice, welcomed the ruling with mixed emotions.

Families React

Debra Burlingame, whose brother Charles was the pilot of American Airlines Flight 77, said:

“This is a necessary step. If you plan the deadliest attack on American soil, there must be accountability. But we’ve waited far too long for this moment.”

Others have expressed concerns about the fairness and legality of trying these suspects in military tribunals rather than civilian courts. Human rights groups have condemned the decision, arguing that the possibility of a death sentence after years of alleged torture violates international norms.

A Broader Impact

The ruling comes at a time when debates over the death penalty are resurging in the United States. Several states have moved away from capital punishment, but federal cases — especially those involving terrorism — continue to treat it as a viable option.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, often referred to as KSM, admitted to planning the 9/11 attacks during a 2007 military hearing. However, that confession was made after he had been subjected to waterboarding over 180 times, raising serious questions about the legitimacy of his statements.

What Comes Next

With the judge’s ruling now in place, the prosecution can officially pursue the death penalty during trial proceedings, though the start date of the full trial remains unclear. Legal analysts say it could still be years before the case is fully resolved.

For many, the ruling represents both progress and a painful reminder of a case haunted by bureaucracy, secrecy, and the scars of national trauma.

As the U.S. government seeks to close this decades-old chapter, the world watches to see whether justice — however delayed — will finally be delivered.

Attached is a news article regarding the 9/11 mastermind attacks as there is a court ruling 

https://amp.dw.com/en/us-court-throws-out-plea-deal-for-alleged-9-11-mastermind/a-73248794

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

What Happened: Arrest Details

• On Friday, July 11, 2025, Gervonta “Tank” Davis, the 30‑year‑old WBA lightweight boxing champion, was arrested in Miami Beach, Florida, on a domestic violence battery charge stemming from an incident on June 15 (Father’s Day)

• The alleged assault occurred at his ex-girlfriend’s residence in Doral, FL, when he went to pick up their shared children. A verbal dispute purportedly escalated into physical violence, with Davis allegedly hitting her in the back of the head and slapping her face, leaving a minor cut to her inner lip. 

• The victim sent a text to her mother during the incident. The mother then came outside and filmed video footage showing Davis throwing a small box at the victim — evidence reportedly shared with law enforcement. 

Legal Status & Charges

• Davis is currently being held at Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center in Miami-Dade County, without bond; bond is listed as “to be set” 

• According to police, Davis refused to fill out or sign a Miranda rights waiver form when questioned. 

• He faces a charge of battery causing bodily harm in connection with the alleged assault. 

Davis’s Legal History

• This incident is not Davis’s first. Past legal issues include a 2020 domestic battery charge (later dropped) and a 2021 hit-and-run case in Baltimore, for which he served house arrest and jail time after violating probation terms. 

• In December 2022, he faced another battery domestic violence allegation just before a scheduled fight — though the accusation was ultimately recanted and dismissed. 

Fallout & Boxing Implications

• Davis’s arrest has sparked widespread outrage within the boxing community, prompting renewed criticism of his off‑ring behavior and questions regarding how the sport addresses domestic violence among athletes. 

• His last fight was in March 2025, a highly disputed draw against Lamont Roach Jr., which preserved Davis’s title. Plans for a scheduled rematch in August remain uncertain given the current legal developments. 

Why the Headline Mentions His Girlfriend

The arrest is directly tied to allegations from Davis’s former girlfriend: she facilitated documentation of the incident, sent a distress text to her mother during the altercation, and provided video evidence to investigators. Thus, the charges stem from behavior allegedly toward her at their exchange on Father’s Day.

Attached is a news article regarding gervonta Davis arrested for allegedly beating up his girlfriend 

https://www.local10.com/news/local/2025/07/11/boxer-gervonta-davis-arrested-accused-of-assaulting-ex-girlfriend-in-doral/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump’s Visit to Scotland (Summer 2025) — Summary

• Visit scope: Donald Trump, now U.S. President, is planning a semi-private trip to Scotland later this month. The itinerary includes stops at his golf resorts in Turnberry (South Ayrshire) and Menie in Aberdeenshire, including the opening of a new course and memorial garden. No meetings with King Charles are scheduled, although Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to meet him during the visit. 

• Police Scotland preparations: Authorities are gearing up for a significant security operation potentially involving up to 5,000 officers working extended shifts. Planning is underway even before final confirmation of the visit date.  

Historical Precedents and Cost Figures

2018—Presidential Visit:

• Trump’s official UK visit in July 2018 triggered demonstrations primarily in London and Edinburgh. The overall UK policing operation cost was estimated at £18 million, with nearly 10,000 officers across the country deployed and over 26,000 shifts worked.  

• The Visit to Scotland alone (Turnberry golf course) was charged to Police Scotland at approximately £3.2 million, around half of which was for overtime (~£1.6 m). The Treasury covered these costs.  

2023—Private Citizen Visit:

• Trump’s May 2023 trip to Scotland—his first since losing the U.S. presidency—cost only around £60,000 in Police Scotland overtime and subsistence payments (approx. £57,500 overtime and £2,000 subsistence). There was no formal funding mechanism to recover these costs, as he visited as a private individual. The operation was known as “Operation Booknote.”  

Projected Cost for 2025 Visit

While exact costs for the upcoming trip remain unknown, comparisons to prior visits provide context:

1. Given the scale—possibly official due to state or governmental coordination—costs are likely to exceed those of the private 2023 trip.

2. Assuming similar deployment levels (thousands of officers), the expense could approach or exceed the multi‑million‑pound scale seen in 2018.

3. Funding arrangements remain uncertain:

• If deemed an official visit, the Treasury or UK central government may reimburse Police Scotland.

• If unofficial, then Police Scotland may again absorb most of the cost due to lack of recovery mechanisms.

Critics including political figures have voiced concern that Scottish taxpayers may be left footing the bill unless formal arrangements are made with Westminster. 

Latest Reporting

Recent published coverage highlights the scale of planning and concern:

• Up to 5,000 officers may be deployed.

• Preparations include airspace restrictions, presidential motorcade logistics, rooftop snipers, US Secret Service coordination, and potential protests. 

• The visit remains officially unconfirmed, with governments in UK and Scotland still preparing contingency plans.

In Conclusion

Trump’s projected summer 2025 stay in Scotland is poised to be one of the most complex and costly security operations seen since his 2018 state visit. Given the scale of planning and lack of clarity about reimbursement, significant pressure remains on Scottish police funding if the Treasury does not step in. More publicly available budget numbers will likely emerge as the visit is finalized.

Attached is a news article regarding Donald trump visit to Scotland and the considerable cost for the police 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm20xvgmd8yo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Vigilante YouTuber JiDion Confronts Alleged Barber Predator Nicholas Mancini

Allegations, Sting, and Arrest

In June 2025, online content creator JiDion—known for orchestrating sting operations to expose suspected child predators—captured footage that led to the arrest of 39‑year‑old barber Nicholas Mancini in Endicott, New York. Mancini allegedly believed he was grooming a 13‑year-old girl, reportedly sending sexually explicit images through Facebook beginning on April 2, 2025, and later switching to Snapchat when the minor disclosed her age. 

JiDion arranged a visit to Mancini’s place of work—posing as the girl’s acquaintance—to confront him after a haircut. When Mancini insisted they move away from his workplace, the YouTuber recognized suspicious behavior and alerted authorities. The entire exchange was recorded and turned over to the police. Mancini was arrested and sent to Broome County Jail pending charges; his former employer quickly terminated him upon learning of the allegations. 

Legal Status & Ethical Issues

Mancini has since been released from custody, but the case remains under investigation. At the time of writing, the charges—though serious—are still allegations, and no conviction has been reached. 

The case raises complex questions about vigilante justice. Critics warn that YouTubers performing sting operations risk compromising investigations or escalating dangerous situations, despite sometimes assisting law enforcement efforts. 

Community Response

The barber’s former employer issued a public statement expressing shock, condemning Mancini’s alleged behavior, and clarifying that they had no prior knowledge of the misconduct. They emphasized their commitment to upholding community trust and safe business environments. 

Context & Comparisons

This incident reflects a broader trend in which online content creators replicate “paedophile-hunting” stings. A 2024 New Statesman report examined how channels like LuxuryPranks have produced content capturing alleged predators—though many of these videos have raised concerns about authenticity, legality, and morality. 

In the UK, similar cases include a barber in Penwortham who was wrongly targeted by a paedophile hunter and later exonerated; the hunter publicly apologized after damaging his reputation and business. Other high-profile UK cases—including one involving a barber jailed for trying to meet a child he thought was underage online—underscore both the severity and complexity of such crimes. 

What Happens Next

• Criminal Proceedings: Authorities in Broome County are continuing to investigate and decide whether to bring formal charges. If convicted, Mancini could face charges related to child grooming and illegal sexual communication.

• Media Impact: The role of content creators like JiDion continues to be scrutinized—debate centers on whether such operations aid law enforcement or create unacceptable risks.

• Public Safety & Awareness: The case has renewed calls for more transparent, professional handling of child grooming cases—emphasizing the need to protect minors without relying solely on vigilante tactics.

Summary

• JiDion, a YouTuber, conducted a sting operation that led to the arrest of barber Nicholas Mancini, who allegedly tried to groom a 13-year‑old online.

• Messages began on Facebook (April 2, 2025) and continued on Snapchat; all evidence was provided to the police. Mancini was arrested and later released, before a formal charge or conviction.

• The case raises legal and ethical concerns around non‑professional stings and mirror broader controversies in paedophile hunting culture.

• Similar cases have appeared in both the U.S. and UK—including innocent individuals who were wrongly accused—highlighting the risks involved.

• Authorities are now investigating, and no conviction has been confirmed at this time.

Attached is a news article regarding the national child abuse prevention month 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/national-child-abuse-prevention-month-2025/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tragedy at Mile End Underground: Person Dies After Falling on Tracks

London, July 11, 2025 — A person has tragically died after falling onto the tracks at Mile End Underground Station during the morning rush hour, prompting widespread disruption on the Central Line and sparking an outpouring of public grief.

Emergency services were called to the east London station at around 7:45 a.m. following reports of a person on the tracks. Witnesses described chaotic scenes as commuters were evacuated from platforms while paramedics and fire crews rushed to the scene.

Despite the efforts of emergency responders, the person — whose identity has not yet been released — was pronounced dead at the scene. The circumstances leading to the fall remain unclear, and British Transport Police (BTP) have launched an investigation. At this time, the incident is not being treated as suspicious.

“We were called to Mile End station following reports of a casualty on the tracks,” a BTP spokesperson said. “Sadly, a person was pronounced dead at the scene. Officers are working to identify the individual and inform their next of kin.”

Transport for London (TfL) suspended services between Liverpool Street and Leytonstone for several hours, causing significant delays and overcrowding on the line as commuters were forced to find alternative routes. Full service was later restored by early afternoon.

Witnesses on the platform described the moment of the incident as “harrowing,” with some visibly shaken. “Everyone was just standing around waiting for the train, then suddenly there was panic and screaming,” said Hannah Reid, 29, a commuter who witnessed the aftermath. “It’s absolutely heartbreaking.”

Mental health charities have urged the public to be mindful of those struggling and reminded Londoners that help is available. Samaritans volunteers were deployed to the station later in the day to provide emotional support to affected passengers and staff.

TfL issued a statement expressing condolences to the family of the deceased and thanking passengers for their patience during the disruption.

The tragedy is the latest in a series of distressing incidents on London’s rail network, renewing calls for improved platform safety measures, including barriers at busy stations like Mile End.

Anyone affected by the incident or experiencing distress is encouraged to contact Samaritans on 116 123, free of charge, at any time.

Attached is a news article regarding a person who dies on the tracks at Mile End train station underground 

https://www.newhamrecorder.co.uk/news/25296528.mile-end-station-person-dies-hit-train/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Heroes at Hart Street: Police Officers Honoured for Courage in Southport

On May 9, 2025, it was announced that Sergeant Gregory Gillespie, Constable Luke Holden, and PCSO Timothy Parry of Merseyside Police had been nominated—and later awarded—for their extraordinary bravery during the appalling knife attack in Southport on July 29, 2024. 

What Happened

• At midday on July 29, 2024, reports came in of a man attacking children with a knife at a Taylor Swift-themed children’s dance workshop on Hart Street in Southport.

• Sergeant Gillespie, single-crewed and dealing with another case elsewhere at the time, arrived first. He described scenes of “chaos” and directed paramedics to a seriously injured child before entering the building. 

• Moments later, PC Holden and PCSO Parry arrived from Southport police station, joining Gillespie as public panic intensified: people were fleeing with children, and the studio entrance had a smashed glass panel. Armed only with a baton, a taser, and no immediate armed backup, the officers confronted the suspect. 

• Inside, at the top of a narrow staircase, they confronted Axel Rudakubana wielding a large knife. Sergeant Gillespie and PC Holden advanced shoulder‑to‑shoulder, issuing orders to drop the weapon as Parry secured the exit and helped manage civilians. 

• Officials said that when Rudakubana realised he faced firm and unflinching officers, he dropped the knife—pledging an end to further attacks and enabling them to disarm and restrain him on the ground. 

These actions effectively prevented further loss of life in a situation that had already claimed the lives of three young girls and injured ten others inside the venue. 

The Officers

Sergeant Gregory Gillespie

• Beaten route: normally not assigned to Southport; arrived first on the scene while covering for another officer.

• Key moments: saw injured child outside, coordinated early medical support, then entered the building with only a baton in hand, stepping directly into danger.

Constable Luke Holden

• Joined seconds later alongside PCSO Parry.

• Drew a taser upon entry and partnered with Sgt Gillespie to move up the stairs toward the suspect—secure, focused, and unhesitating in the face of real threat.

PCSO Timothy Parry

• Although not equipped with standard police tools like a baton or Taser, positioned at the rear to manage civilians and maintain a secure exit.

• Vital in preventing others from entering the hazardous interior and assisted in the physical restraint of the attacker once he collapsed.

Their unity and courage under extreme pressure were recognized by Chief Constable Serena Kennedy, who described their response as “facing the most harrowing situation Merseyside Police has ever had to deal with” Merseyside Police Federation Chair Chris McGlade praised their professionalism, stating the trio had acted “without hesitation” and with “the highest levels of bravery” 

Award Recognition

• The officers were nominated for the National Police Bravery Awards 2025, hosted by the Police Federation of England and Wales (PFEW).

• On July 10, 2025, they were officially revealed as winners—honoured as “Britain’s bravest officers” for their intervention that likely saved more lives and brought a violent rampage to an end. 

Reflecting on the award, PCSO Parry described it as “bittersweet”—recognition against the backdrop of profound tragedy. 

Why It Matters

• Swift, brave action: With limited equipment and no armed back‑up, the officers leveraged presence, teamwork, and courage to confront a heavily armed individual.

• High stakes: Their actions occurred as young children were under direct threat inside a crowded space.

• Community impact: Their intervention ended a violent sequence and prevented further casualties, bringing a tragic episode to a close and giving space for the law to take over.

The brutality of the scene, the targeted nature of the attack, and the emotional devastation left behind made their actions deeply significant—not just tactically, but morally and symbolically.

In Summary

Sergeant Gregory Gillespie, Constable Luke Holden, and PCSO Timothy Parry demonstrated exemplary courage during Southport’s worst tragedy—a professionalism recognized with the top bravery award in policing. Their actions underscore how dedication, rapid response, and human resolve can make the ultimate difference in moments of crisis.

Attached is a News article regarding the three police officers who was given awards over the Southport murders 

https://news.sky.com/story/officers-who-confronted-coward-southport-killer-axel-rudakubana-win-police-bravery-award-13394408

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Agents Crack Down on Illegal Moped Delivery Drivers in Major UK Cities

Authorities across the UK have launched a sweeping crackdown on illegal moped delivery drivers operating under the radar of law enforcement and immigration rules. The coordinated effort, led by the Home Office, local police forces, and immigration enforcement teams, is targeting drivers using fake identities, lacking proper licences, or working in breach of visa restrictions.

The operation has been most visible in London, Birmingham, and Manchester—cities with some of the highest concentrations of delivery riders. Officers in plain clothes have been stationed outside popular food delivery hotspots, such as high streets, fast-food chains, and delivery hubs, pulling over riders for surprise checks on licences, insurance, vehicle documents, and immigration status.

Dozens of Arrests and Bikes Seized

In London alone, over 80 mopeds were seized in the past two weeks, and at least 30 individuals have been arrested on suspicion of illegal working, immigration breaches, or traffic offences. Several riders were found to be using other people’s identities, or renting accounts from third parties—both violations of major delivery companies’ policies.

“We are sending a clear message that this type of law-breaking won’t be tolerated,” said Chief Inspector Mark Dempsey of the Metropolitan Police. “While the vast majority of delivery drivers are hard-working individuals doing the right thing, a minority are putting public safety at risk and undermining immigration laws.”

Public Safety Concerns

Illegal moped riders have been linked to a rise in road traffic accidents and crimes such as phone snatching and drug delivery. Many lack training or insurance, making them a risk on the road. In some cases, individuals with serious criminal records have managed to evade background checks by using fake documents.

“We’ve had reports of people with no legal status in the UK making hundreds of deliveries a week using accounts rented on WhatsApp for £50 a night,” said an official from Immigration Enforcement. “This kind of activity undermines our labour system and puts legal workers at a disadvantage.”

Food Delivery Giants Under Pressure

Major platforms like Deliveroo, Uber Eats, and Just Eat are under renewed scrutiny. Critics say lax verification systems and the use of third-party accounts have created a loophole for exploitation.

In response, Deliveroo said it was “fully cooperating” with authorities and has removed hundreds of fraudulent accounts in recent months. Uber Eats has also announced it is investing in more secure facial recognition and ID verification tools to crack down on illegal account sharing.

Mixed Reactions from the Public

While many citizens have welcomed the action, arguing that it protects jobs and improves safety, others have raised concerns over the impact on vulnerable migrants.

Campaigners warn that some illegal riders are victims of trafficking or economic desperation. “The system is failing to differentiate between criminals and those being exploited,” said Amina Begum from the Migrant Rights Network. “We need a more compassionate approach, not just crackdowns.”

What’s Next

The Home Office has confirmed that enforcement operations will continue “in the coming months” and is urging delivery companies to strengthen their systems. In the meantime, riders are being advised to ensure they have proper documentation, valid insurance, and legal right to work—or risk fines, arrest, and deportation.

As the gig economy continues to grow, the battle over legality, safety, and exploitation in the delivery sector is far from over.

Attached is a News article regarding crack down on illegal migrants driving moped for delivery companies in the uk streets 

https://news.sky.com/story/a-constant-game-of-cat-and-mouse-inside-the-crackdown-on-illegal-moped-delivery-drivers-13394792

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561