Thursday, 4 September 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tragedy in Lisbon: Funicular Derailment Claims at Least 15 Lives, Dozens Injured

Lisbon, Portugal – September 3, 2025 — A devastating accident struck the historic Glória funicular (Elevador da Glória) in central Lisbon Wednesday evening, leaving at least 15 people dead and 18 others injured, several of them critically. The calamity has plunged the city and country into mourning as investigations into its cause are promptly underway. 

The Incident

The incident unfolded shortly after 6 p.m. local time, as the funicular — a celebrated heritage line that connects Baixa to Bairro Alto — derailed while descending a steep hill and violently collided with a building. Eyewitnesses described an abrupt loss of control:

“It hit the building with brutal force and fell apart like a cardboard box.” 

Emergency crews responded swiftly, deploying dozens of first responders and vehicles. Within hours, the victims were pulled from the wreckage and taken to nearby hospitals.  

Casualties and Victims

Fatalities: At least 15 people were confirmed dead immediately following the crash. 

Injuries: 18 individuals were reported injured, with five in serious condition. Among them, a child was also hospitalized.    

Nationalities: Authorities noted that both local and foreign nationals were among the victims, though no identities have been disclosed. 

What Went Wrong?

Early reports suggest the derailment was triggered by a loose cable, which likely caused brake failure and the tram to veer off the rails.  However, this remains under official investigation.

Carris, the public transport company operating the line, maintains that all maintenance protocols—including daily inspections and monthly and weekly checks—were strictly followed.  

The Glória Funicular: History and Heritage

Operational since 1885, the Glória Funicular is one of Lisbon’s most iconic transit systems, transporting more than 3 million passengers annually along its short but steep 275-meter route. It was designated a national monument in 2002.  

Government Response and Investigation

The Portuguese government has declared Thursday a national day of mourning; Lisbon’s municipality extended mourning over three days.  

The public prosecutor’s office has launched a formal investigation, in tandem with Carris’s internal inquiry. 

In the aftermath, all other funicular and streetcar operations in Lisbon have been suspended for immediate safety inspections.  

Voices of Comfort and Solidarity

Mayor Carlos Moedas called the incident “a tragedy that has never happened before in our city,” extending gratitude for the rapid response.  

Prime Minister Luís Montenegro and President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa offered condolences and pledged full transparency in the investigation.  

European leaders, including Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and EC President Ursula von der Leyen, expressed solidarity and support.  

Looking Ahead

As Lisbon and Portugal grapple with the aftermath, authorities are racing to determine how a system in regular maintenance could succumb to such a catastrophic failure. The suspension of all funicular operations underscores the urgency of reinforcing transport safety standards.

Communities are now mourning, while families and the broader public await answers in what has become one of the most devastating urban transport tragedies in recent memory.

Attached is a news article regarding 15?dead and 18 injured after funicular derails in Lisbon 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1jzlgj915no.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Lloyds Banking Group to Put Thousands of Jobs at Risk Amid Restructuring Plans

Lloyds Banking Group is preparing to announce a sweeping restructuring programme that could put thousands of staff at risk of losing their jobs, raising fresh concerns about employment security within the UK’s financial sector.

The bank, which employs more than 60,000 people across the UK, is reportedly reviewing its operations as part of a wider cost-cutting drive and a push towards digital banking. Sources close to the matter suggest that traditional branch roles and back-office positions are most at risk, as customer behaviour continues to shift towards online and mobile services.

A spokesperson for Lloyds confirmed that a consultation process is under way but stressed that no final decisions have been made. “We are constantly evolving to meet the changing needs of our customers. While this means some roles will be affected, we are committed to supporting colleagues through these changes and, where possible, redeploying them into new positions within the group,” the statement read.

The news comes amid a wider trend in the UK banking industry, where major lenders such as Barclays, NatWest, and HSBC have also announced job reductions over the past year. Analysts point out that digital transformation, rising operating costs, and economic uncertainty have combined to accelerate the sector’s shift away from physical banking networks.

Unions have condemned the move, warning that staff morale and customer service will be damaged. “This is yet another blow for loyal workers who have served their communities for years,” said a representative of Unite the Union. “We will be pushing Lloyds to avoid compulsory redundancies and to provide meaningful redeployment opportunities.”

The potential job cuts highlight the growing tension between efficiency drives in banking and the human cost of technological progress. While Lloyds has reaffirmed its commitment to investing in digital platforms, employees now face an anxious wait to see whether their roles will survive the shake-up.

Attached is a news article regarding Lloyd’s banking group putting staff at risk of losing there job 

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/uks-lloyds-put-thousands-staff-risk-dismissal-2025-09-04/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Wednesday, 3 September 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Morgan Stanley Calls DOJ Ruling a “Near Best-Case Scenario” for Apple—Shares Jump

Date: September 3, 2025

Apple shares surged in premarket trading today, climbing approximately 3.9% after a U.S. District Judge delivered a ruling in the ongoing Google antitrust case that analysts say strongly favors the iPhone maker.  

What Morgan Stanley Said

In its analyst note, Morgan Stanley described the ruling as a “near best-case scenario” for Apple, noting key outcomes:

Apple retains the ability to collect traffic acquisition payments (TAC) from Google—and potentially other search providers—even though Google can no longer maintain exclusive default status for Search, Chrome, Assistant, and Gemini.  

These TAC payments represent a massive annual revenue stream—estimated at $25 billion+ with over 95% margins.  

Apple now has the strategic flexibility to renegotiate these search deals annually, and potentially introduce a search choice screen to its users.  

Morgan Stanley concluded the ruling is a “clearing event for the stock” and likely to have a negligible to possibly positive financial impact.  

Additionally, the firm noted that Apple is “actively looking at” adding a GenAI product as a search option in Safari within the coming year. 

Broader Market Implications

Bank of America echoed the optimistic tone, calling the ruling a “win for Apple” and raising its price objective to $260, citing renewed confidence in Apple’s Services growth.  

Moreover, the ruling preserves Apple’s critical default search revenue stream while granting it greater negotiating power—especially important given increasing regulatory scrutiny and slowed hardware growth.  

Final Take

In essence, Morgan Stanley views the DOJ ruling as a strongly favorable development for Apple—preserving its key revenue model, improving its strategic flexibility, and potentially accelerating its foray into AI-enhanced services. With upbeat commentary from analysts and a refreshed bullish outlook from peers like Bank of America, today marks a pivotal moment for Apple’s Services-driven future.

Attached is a news article regarding Apple saying Morgan Stanley share price has risen 

https://www.marketwatch.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-s-p500-nasdaq-up-as-google-parent-rallies-dow-down-30yr-yieled-near-5-percent/card/alphabet-and-apple-pop-on-court-ruling-and-other-early-market-movers-ur63njGvZnpMhXB1ydi1

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36



















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Epstein Victims Hold Emotional News Conference Demanding Justice

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse gathered at a press conference today to renew their call for justice, accountability, and transparency in the long-running scandal that continues to cast a shadow over powerful institutions and individuals.

The event, attended by several women who say they were abused by Epstein as teenagers and young adults, was marked by powerful testimony. Victims spoke of years of trauma, the failure of authorities to act swiftly, and the lingering frustration that many of Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators have not faced legal consequences.

“We were silenced for too long,” one survivor said, her voice breaking. “Epstein may be dead, but the people who enabled him are still out there. They must be held accountable.”

Lawyers representing the women used the press conference to highlight the systemic failures that allowed Epstein to operate for decades, from lenient plea deals to questionable prosecutorial decisions. They also pressed for the release of more court documents, which could reveal the names of influential figures who were connected to Epstein’s network.

The survivors stressed that their campaign was not only about their own healing but about ensuring that future generations are better protected. Many called for reforms to how cases of human trafficking and sexual exploitation are investigated, particularly when the accused have wealth and connections.

Public interest in the Epstein case remains high, with questions lingering about the extent of his connections to high-profile politicians, business leaders, and celebrities. While Epstein’s 2019 death in a Manhattan jail cell was officially ruled a suicide, it has done little to ease suspicions about whether the full truth has been uncovered.

For the victims, today’s press conference was a reminder that their fight is far from over.

“We want truth, we want justice, and we will not stop until the world knows everything,” another survivor declared.

The group announced plans for further legal action and pledged to continue lobbying lawmakers for stronger protections for victims of trafficking and abuse.

key points from the article:

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse held a press conference demanding justice and accountability.

Victims gave emotional testimony about years of trauma and systemic failures by authorities.

Lawyers criticized lenient plea deals and called for release of more court documents.

Survivors urged investigation into Epstein’s enablers and powerful connections.

Calls were made for reforms in handling human trafficking and sexual exploitation cases.

Public suspicion remains over Epstein’s 2019 jail death and unanswered questions.

The victims pledged to pursue further legal action and continue lobbying for stronger protections.

Conclusion:

The press conference underscored that, despite Epstein’s death, his victims remain determined to expose the full truth and hold every enabler accountable. Their call for justice is not only about personal closure but also about systemic change—ensuring that powerful figures can no longer hide behind wealth and influence to escape scrutiny. As the survivors continue their legal and public campaign, the Epstein case stands as a stark reminder of how deeply institutions can fail victims—and how resilient those victims can be in their fight for justice.

Attached is a news article regarding Epstein victims hold news conference 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cpwywe5ee84t

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Meets Poland’s New President Karol Nawrocki: A Strategic Pivot at the White House

Washington, D.C. — September 3, 2025 – In a highly anticipated diplomatic engagement, U.S. President Donald Trump hosted Poland’s newly inaugurated President Karol Nawrocki at the White House. This marked their second in-person meeting, following Nawrocki’s campaign visit during the lead-up to his victory. 

A Meeting Heavy with Symbolism and Strategy

Nawrocki’s journey to Washington as his first official foreign trip underscores both his intent to assert Poland’s strategic autonomy and deliver on his campaign promise of revitalizing ties with the U.S.

During their meeting, the leaders observed a flyover salute in honor of a fallen Polish F-16 pilot—an emotional tribute symbolizing the deep military ties between the two nations. Trump reiterated America’s commitment to maintaining troop presence in Poland and praised Poland’s defense spending efforts aligned with NATO expectations.

Key Agenda Items: Security, Ukraine, and Energy

The discussions centered on:

Security in the face of Russian aggression: Nawrocki appealed for continued U.S. military presence, particularly given the threat posed by Russia and ongoing military drills by Russia and Belarus.

The conflict in Ukraine: While both leaders reaffirmed support for Ukraine, Nawrocki expressed caution about its NATO aspirations, signaling a nuanced shift from his more dovish predecessor. 

Energy collaboration: Poland’s energy concerns—ranging from LNG imports to nuclear ambitions—were on the table, with both sides eyeing deeper ties. 

Tensions at Home: A Divided Foreign Policy in Warsaw

Nawrocki’s visit has stirred internal friction in Poland. Prime Minister Donald Tusk and his pro-EU government were notably sidelined; no government officials joined Nawrocki’s delegation, breaking with traditional protocols. 

Analysts warn this dualistic approach—where the presidency and government pursue conflicting foreign agendas—could undermine Poland’s coherence on the international stage, especially amid escalating geopolitical challenges. 

What It Means for NATO and Eastern Europe

Poland’s assertive posture reflects its role as NATO’s eastern frontier and underscores the growing divergence between Warsaw’s executive offices and its parliamentary government. With U.S. focus increasingly shifting to the Indo-Pacific, Poland may increasingly lean on Washington for backing in Europe’s evolving security landscape. 

In hosting President Nawrocki, Trump not only bolstered a NATO partnership but also signaled support for Poland’s new leadership—at a time when internal divisions threaten Warsaw’s unity in foreign relations.

Let me know if you’d like deeper insight on Poland’s energy plans, domestic politics, or how this visit might influence upcoming NATO discussions.

Attached is a news article regarding Donald Trump meeting with new polish president karol Nawrocki 

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/trump-welcomes-polands-nawrocki-white-house-with-eye-ukraine-2025-09-03/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Article: Alphabet Stock Surges After Judge Rules Google Can Keep Chrome

A Legal Win, A Market Rally

On Tuesday, September 2, 2025, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta issued a pivotal antitrust ruling, delivering a significant reprieve for Alphabet Inc.—Google’s parent company. The court declined to force the sale of Chrome browser or Android OS, key assets that the Department of Justice (DoJ) had sought to breakup under antitrust remedies. Instead, Judge Mehta imposed less drastic measures—requiring Google to share some search data with competitors and banning certain exclusive agreements—but allowing the company to continue preloading Google products and paying partners like Apple for default placement. 

This decision spared Alphabet from one of the harshest potential penalties—forcing it to divest core components of its business—but maintained a measure of accountability by pushing for increased competition in search. 

Stock Market’s Reaction

Investor sentiment turned decisively bullish. In after-hours trading on Tuesday, Alphabet’s stock jumped by approximately 7%. By Wednesday morning, pre-market gains of around 6% were recorded.,


Why the Market Cheers the Verdict

1. Preservation of Strategic Assets

The ruling allowed Alphabet to retain control over Chrome and Android, avoiding structural breakups that could have severely disrupted its ecosystem and strategy. 

2. Continuity of Apple Deal

Google’s lucrative arrangement—paying Apple over $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine—was upheld, ensuring a vital and high-margin revenue stream for both Alphabet and Apple. 

3. Wall Street Upgrades

Analysts like Daniel Ives at Wedbush dubbed it a “monster win” and raised price targets—from $225 to $245, implying ~16% upside. Oppenheimer also raised its target to $270 from $235, noting the ruling removes a major overhang for investors. 

4. Overhang Removed

With a cloud of uncertainty lifted, investors expect Alphabet’s valuation to realign more closely with peers—especially given its leadership in AI and Google Cloud growth. 

Broader Competitive Implications

While a notable win for Alphabet and Apple, the ruling still imposes constraints:

Data-sharing mandates aim to level the playing field with rivals like Bing and DuckDuckGo. 

Ban on exclusive placement contracts is intended to reduce monopolistic leverage, though default arrangements (with payments) can continue. 

Nevertheless, analysts view the remedies as moderate rather than radical, giving Google room to adapt while signaling that stronger future action could follow if competition remains weak. 

The Road Ahead

Alphabet plans to appeal the ruling, which could delay enforcement or adjustments well into the future. 

The DoJ may contest whether the remedies go far enough. 

Potential for future Apple–Google AI collaboration is gaining traction amid renewed confidence in their strategic ties. 

Conclusion

Judge Mehta’s recent ruling—not forcing Alphabet to divest Chrome or Android—is being hailed as a market-friendly outcome for Google, triggering a sharp rally in its stock. While the company faces increased scrutiny through data-sharing mandates and restrictions on exclusivity, investors and analysts view this as a manageable risk compared to the threat of enforced breakups.

With its strategic assets intact and a path to renewed growth, particularly in AI, Alphabet is now better positioned to realize its value—at least for now. Its stock is soaring, and market sentiment is cheering this legal reprieve.

Attached is a news article regarding alphabet stock jump after court say that goggle can keep Crome browser 

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/09/02/google-antitrust-search-ruling.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Tuesday, 2 September 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Fears Mount Over UK’s £1 Million Earthquake Aid to Afghanistan Falling Into Taliban Hands

In the wake of a devastating earthquake in eastern Afghanistan in early September 2025, the UK pledged £1 million (approximately $1.35 million) in emergency humanitarian aid. Funds have been carefully routed through trusted intermediaries such as the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) to avoid direct dealings with the Taliban government. 

Despite these precautions, concerns are mounting among humanitarian groups and analysts about the risk that aid may still be compromised, intentionally or otherwise, by the Taliban’s existing practices of interference, diversion, and donor restrictions.

The Challenge of Ensuring Aid Reaches Those in Need

Afghanistan’s dire humanitarian landscape—marked by years of conflict, isolation, and declining development support since the Taliban’s return to power in 2021—has made aid delivery exceedingly complex. Even when delivered through neutral channels, aid infrastructures may still fall under Taliban influence. 

A report by the U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) recently accused the Taliban of forcibly diverting aid, excluding minorities and women, and coercing NGOs to work with Taliban-affiliated partners, sometimes through intimidation or worse. The UN, while acknowledging efforts to maintain a complex aid environment, warns of persistent interference and corruption risks. 

These structural issues are deeply ingrained. Reports from local media and aid workers reveal that Taliban-affiliated officials often dictate who receives aid, favoring loyalists or their own networks, even when distribution is ostensibly done by NGOs. 

Earthquake Aid: A Fragile Humanitarian Lifeline

The recent 6.0-magnitude quake struck remote, mountainous regions—particularly in Kunar and Nangarhar—causing significant loss of life and infrastructure damage, while complicating rescue and aid access due to landslides and blocked roads. 

With international aid already shrunken, the UK’s contribution provides essential, life-saving support. However, in a context where even UN-distributed aid can be undercut, the risk of misappropriation is real.

Navigating Aid Delivery Amidst Worsening Conditions

Sanctions and Banking Restrictions: Sanctions on the Taliban-controlled financial system and international “de-risking” policies have drastically limited aid channels, forcing adaptations such as barter systems or currency swaps—and increasing the risk of manipulation. 

Constraints on Women’s Participation: The systematic exclusion of women from NGO work hinders needs assessment, relief operations, and oversight—amplifying both gender inequities and risk of aid diversion. 

Oversight Limitations: Security and regulatory constraints restrict independent audits or monitoring by third parties, making it harder to trace where aid ultimately ends up.

Ongoing Pressure from Aid Agencies: Humanitarian organizations continue pushing for stronger safeguards, insisting on transparency and equitable distribution, even in highly controlled environments.

Balancing Humanitarian Urgency and Accountability

The UK’s decision to channel funds through UNFPA and IFRC reflects an understanding of these challenges—but it is not foolproof. Transparency mechanisms, rigorous third-party monitoring, and conditional funding tied to distribution oversight are vital. At the very least, these funds can provide essential health kits, mobile clinics, and emergency supplies to earthquake victims—provided they reach the intended recipients.

As one aid worker reflects: the goal is not merely to deliver supplies, but to ensure sustained and equitable access to help those in the greatest need—without sustaining the structures that marginalize and suppress them.

Summary:

While the UK’s pledge is a welcome humanitarian gesture, the long shadow of Taliban interference in aid distribution—compounded by sanctions, gender restrictions, and opaque systems—leans toward inevitable concern. Vigilance, accountability, and continued pressure on implementing partners are essential to protect the integrity of urgently needed relief.

Attached is a news article regarding fears regarding aid for Afghanistan falling into to the wrong hands like the taliban 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/afghanistan-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-fear-of-the-taliban-afghanistan-august-2025-accessible

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump the ‘Elephant in the Room’ at Xi–Putin–Modi Chinese Summit

At a high-profile summit hosted in China this week, world leaders gathered to discuss global trade, security, and the shifting balance of power in an increasingly multipolar world. Yet, despite his absence, former U.S. President Donald Trump dominated the subtext of the talks, becoming what many observers called the “elephant in the room.”

The meeting brought together Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi—three figures whose countries collectively represent nearly half of the world’s population and a significant share of global economic output. Ostensibly, the agenda centered on strengthening regional cooperation, advancing new energy deals, and countering Western sanctions. However, behind closed doors, Trump’s potential political return in the United States loomed large.

Diplomats close to the discussions noted that Beijing and Moscow, in particular, are calculating how a second Trump presidency might reshape global alliances. For Xi, Trump’s known skepticism toward NATO and transatlantic commitments could further weaken Western unity, giving China more space to push its global economic initiatives. For Putin, who has endured years of Western sanctions and isolation, the possibility of Trump returning to the White House raises hopes for a less hostile stance from Washington. Modi, meanwhile, finds himself balancing India’s traditional partnership with the U.S. against his country’s growing strategic ties with Russia and China.

Analysts suggest that Trump’s unpredictable foreign policy record is precisely why he casts such a long shadow over such summits. During his presidency, he pursued a trade war with China, held personal summits with Kim Jong-un, and questioned the value of NATO—all moves that unsettled America’s allies and emboldened its rivals. Now, as U.S. elections approach, his name is surfacing in discussions far from Washington, influencing strategies of leaders who must anticipate every possible outcome.

Key Points:

The summit between Xi, Putin, and Modi highlighted global realignments.

Trump, though absent, was widely regarded as a key unspoken factor in the talks.

Russia and China view a possible Trump return as a weakening of Western unity.

India faces a delicate balancing act between Washington and Moscow-Beijing ties.

Conclusion

The Chinese summit underscored not just the importance of multipolar cooperation, but also the uncertainty that American politics injects into the global stage. With Trump looming over international discussions despite being thousands of miles away, it is clear that the world’s leaders are already gaming out scenarios for a future where U.S. policy might once again be defined by his unpredictable hand.

Attached is a news article regarding the Chinese summit meeting 

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/01/china/china-putin-xi-meeting-sco-summit-intl-hnk

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Purple Aki: The Story Behind the Man and the Mystery of His Death

Akinwale Arobieke, widely known across Merseyside and Greater Manchester as “Purple Aki,” was one of the UK’s most notorious and enigmatic figures. His name became urban folklore, whispered in playgrounds, pubs, and on street corners for decades. Now, with his death confirmed in his flat at the age of 62, many are reflecting on the man behind the myth — and what ultimately led to his demise.

Who Was “Purple Aki”?

Born in Liverpool in 1961, Arobieke grew up in a working-class community but soon became infamous for unusual reasons. His towering frame — standing over 6ft 5in tall with a muscular build — made him an intimidating presence. The nickname “Purple Aki” reportedly came from his dark skin tone, a moniker that many considered racist and derogatory, but one that stuck for much of his life.

He first came to public attention in the 1980s and 1990s after a string of arrests for harassment and intimidation, with victims often claiming that he had an obsession with muscles. He was alleged to approach young men, asking to feel their biceps and sometimes coercing them into performing physical exercises like squats or press-ups. These bizarre encounters earned him a mix of notoriety, fear, and a strange sort of folklore status.

The Man vs. The Myth

While the stories about him often grew into exaggerated urban legends — with children daring each other to say his name, or claiming he stalked gyms looking for bodybuilders — the reality was more complicated.

Arobieke spent years in and out of prison for harassment-related offences. At one point, a Sexual Offences Prevention Order was imposed on him, banning him from approaching young men in public or even entering gyms without permission. He fought against some of these restrictions, but his reputation continued to follow him wherever he went.

Despite his notoriety, those who knew him personally sometimes described a different side — a man deeply misunderstood, isolated by his own legend, and living under the weight of being turned into a local bogeyman.

The Circumstances of His Death

Akinwale Arobieke was found dead in his flat in late August 2025. Early reports suggest there were no suspicious circumstances, with initial indications pointing towards natural causes. At 62, his health had been deteriorating in recent years, and friends claim he had become increasingly reclusive.

The official cause of death has not yet been released, though sources close to the investigation suggest that long-term health problems may have played a role.

Legacy of a Troubled Life

“Purple Aki” leaves behind a complicated legacy. To some, he was a menacing figure who instilled fear across communities. To others, he was the victim of exaggerated stories, racist stereotyping, and a lifetime of being socially alienated.

His death closes a chapter on one of Britain’s strangest urban legends — a man who became larger than life, not for fame or fortune, but for infamy that spiraled far beyond his control.

What remains now is a reminder of how easily individuals can be mythologised, ridiculed, and demonised — sometimes obscuring the very human struggles underneath.

Attached is a news article regarding purple AKI reason of death 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15040443/amp/sinister-deadly-truth-purple-aki.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Monday, 1 September 2025

Smileband News




Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Why the Government is Keeping 1,200 Flats Empty Amid Britain’s Housing Crisis

Britain is facing one of the most severe housing crises in modern history. Rents are rising at record pace, first-time buyers are struggling to get on the property ladder, and councils are overwhelmed by families on waiting lists. Yet, despite this acute shortage, the government has reportedly left around 1,200 newly built flats across the country empty, raising questions about mismanagement, priorities, and the state of public housing policy.

The Empty Flats

The flats in question are largely government-owned or tied to housing associations that operate under state contracts. Many were completed months, even years ago, but remain unoccupied. In some cases, this is due to legal disputes with contractors, in others because of bureaucratic delays in safety inspections or allocation processes.

Critics argue that the issue is not simply about red tape but a failure of political will. With homelessness rising—over 300,000 people in England were recorded as homeless or in temporary accommodation in 2024—the decision to allow liveable homes to stand unused is seen by many as both wasteful and morally indefensible.

Government Justification

Officials have defended the situation, claiming that the flats cannot yet be released due to outstanding safety checks, particularly after the Grenfell Tower tragedy heightened scrutiny of building standards. Others have cited the need to negotiate long-term management contracts before tenants can move in.

While ministers insist the delays are temporary, critics believe these explanations are thin cover for deeper structural problems in the housing sector, including chronic underfunding of councils and a reliance on private developers who often prioritise profit over need.

Public Backlash

Campaigners, opposition MPs, and housing charities have condemned the government’s handling of the matter. The optics are particularly damaging: at a time when rough sleeping has surged by nearly 30% in major cities and families are being moved into cramped hotels and B&Bs, the sight of empty, modern flats has become a symbol of the system’s failure.

Groups like Shelter and Crisis argue that housing should be treated as a basic right, not an asset tied up in bureaucracy or speculation. They point to successful models in countries like Finland, where state-led “Housing First” policies have drastically reduced homelessness by prioritising immediate access to permanent homes.

A Wider Pattern

The issue of empty government housing is not new. For decades, Britain has seen thousands of publicly owned properties fall into disrepair or remain unused due to legal wrangling, austerity-driven cuts, or poor coordination between central and local government. The 1,200 flats are simply the latest example in a pattern that highlights deeper failings in housing policy.

Conclusion

At a time when Britain’s housing crisis is reaching breaking point, the revelation that 1,200 homes are being deliberately kept empty feels like a betrayal to many. Whether due to red tape, safety concerns, or political inertia, the reality is the same: families in need are being denied shelter while habitable flats stand unused. Unless the government takes urgent steps to cut through delays and prioritise people over process, the housing crisis will only deepen—and public trust in the system will continue to erode.

Attached is a news article regarding Britain housing crisis 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/property/englands-housing-crisis-stock-low-just825-homesfor-every-1000/?WT.mc_id=tmgoff_psc_ppc_google_money_generic_broad_dsa_content_property&rm_id=RM_News_UK_Search_Ads_MoneyHub_Pot_DSA_Generic&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21046496353&gbraid=0AAAAADAty5BPffFcUWZdb3SSA1XB0voA6

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  British Man Mia O’Brain Given Life Sentence in Dubai A British national, Mia O’Brain, has be...