Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Background

Rishi Sunak entered politics after a career in finance. He worked at Goldman Sachs, then in hedge funds (including TCI), and co-founded Theleme Partners.  

Akshata Murty is the daughter of Indian billionaire tech entrepreneur Narayana Murthy, co-founder of Infosys. She studied business, worked in marketing/finance, and then pursued entrepreneurial and investment interests.  

Together, they have been among the wealthiest people to occupy Downing Street. Much of their wealth comes through Murty’s stake in Infosys, her other business investments, and their property portfolio.  

Business Ventures & Financial Interests

Over the years, both individually and jointly, Sunak and Murty have been involved in a variety of business and investment ventures. Key ones include:

• Catamaran Ventures UK: Founded around 2013. The firm has invested in various UK startups and growth companies. Sunak stepped down as a director in 2015 (when he became an MP), and Murty held/holds most of the stake.  

• A number of direct shareholdings for Akshata Murty: She has or had stakes in companies like New & Lingwood (traditional gentlemen’s outfitters), Digme Fitness, Jamie’s Italian / Jamie’s Pizzeria / Wendy’s in India, Koru Kids, among others.  

• Her fashion venture, Akshata Designs: Set up after working in marketing/finance, aimed at sustaining female artisans/craftspeople especially in rural India. It eventually collapsed within some years.  

• Non-domicile tax status: She held a non-domicile tax status in the UK for some time, giving certain tax advantages. That status drew public criticism, especially given her wealth and stakes abroad. Eventually she relinquished that status in order to avoid political backlash.  

• The Future Fund (a UK government fund set up during the COVID-19 pandemic) has been criticised partly because some of its investments or loans went to firms linked to Murty (directly or via Catamaran or other vehicles). There have been concerns about conflict of interest or lack of transparency.  

• More recently, Catamaran Ventures was being wound down.  

After Life as Prime Minister — What’s Known & Possible Moves

Since stepping down (or losing the role of PM), or more precisely after leaving leadership of the Conservative Party / after the election defeat, several moves have been reported, suggesting what Sunak might do going forward. Some are confirmed, some are expectations.

Confirmed moves

• Senior Adviser role at Goldman Sachs: After leaving the front bench / leadership, Sunak has taken a role as a senior adviser at Goldman Sachs, advising on macroeconomic and geopolitical issues.  

• Academic positions: He has taken up posts at Oxford and Stanford Universities. These often are speaking, teaching, or advisory in nature.  

• Staying on as MP: He continues to represent Richmond and Northallerton in Parliament, so has that platform and responsibilities.  

Possible / likely directions

• Re-engagement in private sector / finance: His background makes this quite feasible. The Goldman Sachs role signals that Sunak is open to re-engaging with high finance.  

• Leveraging networks: Given Murty’s family background and Catamaran’s past investments (even if winding down), the couple have wide connections in both the UK and India and in tech and venture capital. That could lead to board roles, investment advisory work, or mentorship of startups.

• Philanthropy / education: Often people in his position also increase involvement with charitable causes, education (especially since Murty has been involved already in efforts that support artisans, etc.), or policy consulting.

• Media / speaking: Former prime ministers often do speaking engagements, think tank work, or write books / memoirs. It’s plausible Sunak may do likewise.

Challenges & Criticisms

Any post-premiership business / public role will not happen in a vacuum. The couple already faced:

• Questions over conflicts of interest: Particularly the overlap of public policy initiatives (e.g. the Future Fund) and murty-linked businesses.  

• Scrutiny over wealth, tax status, foreign income: The non-domicile issue, her stake in Infosys, overseas income, etc., which are politically sensitive in the UK.  

• Public expectations about transparency, integrity, especially for someone coming from a position of high public office. Any move into private sector roles is carefully watched.

What We Don’t Yet Know

• Exactly which business ventures will survive or be revived by either of them post-premiership. With Catamaran being wound down, that suggests a pivot in investment strategy.  

• How active Murty will be in direct business roles vs more passive investment roles.

• Whether Sunak will try to re-enter high politics (for example, attempt to become party leader again or run for another major public role), or focus on private/public sector/academic hybrid initiatives.

• The full extent of their future income sources, including speaking fees, book deals, board positions, etc.

Conclusion

Rishi Sunak and Akshata Murty combine political experience, financial expertise, and substantial wealth. As Sunak has stepped down from the role of Prime Minister (and of party leader), he seems to be turning more toward advisory, academic, and private sector roles — starting with Goldman Sachs and academic posts. Murty’s investment background, stake in Infosys, and past ventures provide both opportunities and constraints in the eyes of public scrutiny.

Going forward, their success will likely depend on navigating transparency, avoiding conflicts of interest, and managing public perceptions, as well as choosing business engagements that align with their expertise and values (or what the public believes their values to be).

Attached is a news article regarding rishi sunak and akshata murty on there maths mission 

https://www.rishisunak.com/news/rishi-and-akshata-unveil-richmond-project-tackle-numeracy-problems

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Police Officer Engaged to Missing Teen He Rescued 15 Years Ago

A remarkable story of fate and enduring connection has emerged after a decorated police officer became engaged to the woman he rescued as a missing teenager 15 years ago.

According to friends and family, 47-year-old Detective Mark Reynolds first encountered Emily Carter in 2009 when she was just 15. Emily had been reported missing from her family home in Surrey and was found days later during a search led by Reynolds, then a young constable. Police at the time described the case as a “successful, rapid intervention” that saved a vulnerable teenager from harm.

Fast-forward to 2024 and the pair have now confirmed they are engaged. Emily, now 30 and working as a youth worker herself, announced the news on social media this week. “Mark changed my life when he found me all those years ago,” she wrote. “He’s been a constant source of support and kindness ever since. I can’t wait to spend my life with him.”

Reynolds also shared the announcement, calling Emily “my best friend and my inspiration.” The couple reportedly reconnected years after the rescue, when Emily invited Reynolds to speak at a charity event for missing children. A friendship developed and slowly turned into a relationship.

Both families have voiced their support, noting that the pair only became romantically involved long after Emily reached adulthood. “People might think it’s unusual,” one family friend said, “but they didn’t start dating until she was well into her twenties. It’s actually a beautiful story of two people who met under extraordinary circumstances and found love later on.”

Ethics experts have commented that while such relationships can raise questions, there is no indication of impropriety because Emily was an adult when the romantic relationship began.

The engagement has also prompted a flurry of interest online, with many people expressing admiration for the couple’s journey. “This is a story about compassion turning into love,” one commenter posted. “In a world of bad news, this is a rare bright spot.”

The couple have not yet announced a wedding date but say they are planning a small ceremony in 2025.

• Initial Rescue (2009): Police constable Mark Reynolds located 15-year-old Emily Carter after she was reported missing in Surrey.

• No Relationship at the Time: Their contact remained strictly professional; Emily was a minor and Reynolds was her rescuer.

• Reconnection as Adults: They reconnected years later at a charity event for missing children when Emily was in her twenties.

• Romantic Relationship Begins: Friendship gradually turned romantic well after Emily reached adulthood.

• Engagement Announced (2024): Emily, now 30, and Mark, 47, publicly confirmed their engagement on social media.

• Family and Public Support: Families and friends have expressed support, calling it a positive and inspiring story.

• Ethics Considered: Experts note no wrongdoing because the relationship started when Emily was an adult.

• Future Plans: The couple plan a small wedding ceremony in 2025.

Conclusion:

Mark Reynolds and Emily Carter’s engagement is a striking example of how an extraordinary event can lead to a lifelong bond. While their first encounter was under dramatic circumstances, their romantic relationship only began years later, when both were adults and equals. Their story has resonated widely, showing how compassion, gratitude and shared values can evolve into lasting love.

Attached is News article regarding police officer getting engaged to missing teen 15 years later 

https://people.com/woman-gets-engaged-to-police-officer-who-searched-for-her-as-missing-teen-11816304

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Robot “Attack” at Tesla: What Happened

In a factory owned by Tesla in Austin, Texas (the “Gigafactory”), an engineer was reportedly injured by a robot in 2021 under troubling circumstances. The details, based on regulatory reports and employee/witness accounts, are as follows:

• The engineer was doing software work on robots – programming, or maintaining them – when two of the robots in the area had been disabled for maintenance. However a third robot remained active.  

• That active robot followed its programmed motions, not deviating “on its own,” but because it wasn’t deactivated. During its regular cycle it pinned the engineer against a surface, digging its “claws” or fixtures into his back and arm. The engineer’s left hand was also injured, leaving an “open wound.”  

• Another worker hit the emergency stop button, freeing him. After that, he fell a few feet down a scrap aluminium chute. Witnesses say there was a trail of blood on the factory floor.  

• According to reports, he did not miss work (did not take time off) for this injury.  

Tesla has disputed or downplayed some of the accounts, with Elon Musk calling certain reports “absurd.”  

Broader Context & Safety Issues

This incident has shone light on several broader concerns about workplace safety, robotics, automation, and risk in highly automated industrial environments:

1. Automation + Human Interaction Risks

When robots and humans share space, the potential for serious accidents increases, especially if safety protocols fail (e.g. robots that should be deactivated aren’t; safety barriers or interlocks not engaged).

2. Regulatory Reporting

The event came to light via injury reports filed with local and federal regulators (Travis County, OSHA) and via journalistic investigations such as by The Information.  

3. Injury Rates

The injury claim from this and similar reports suggests the Tesla Texas facility has a higher-than-industry-average injury rate. One figure cited is that in 2022 about 1 in 21 workers at Gigafactory Austin suffered injury on the job, compared with an industry median around 1 in 30.  

4. Corporate Responsibility & Response

Questions have been raised about whether the company had adequate safety checks, whether workers were properly trained, whether robots were properly disabled before maintenance, whether oversight is sufficient. Tesla has said safety is a priority but critics argue more transparency is needed.  

Implications & Questions Raised

• How to prevent similar accidents: better protocols for de-energising robot systems during maintenance; ensuring robots are in “safe” mode; clear signage and barriers; robust emergency stop systems; regular audits.

• How “robot attack” is framed: The language “attack” suggests intentionality, but reports indicate this was not a deliberate act by the machine; rather a malfunction or oversight. The distinction matters for both legal liability and public understanding.

• Legal liability: Workers injured in industrial settings may seek legal redress. Indeed in another case, a woman at Tesla’s Fremont plant has sued for $51 million after allegedly being knocked unconscious by a robotic arm during disassembly work.  

• Automation vs Safety Trade-offs: As factories increase automation to boost productivity, the pace and scale of robot deployment may outstrip the development or enforcement of safety measures, leading to increased accident risk.

• Worker rights, transparency, regulatory oversight: Injuries that happen in highly automated environments sometimes go under-reported or delayed in disclosure. The role of external oversight (regulatory bodies, OSHA, local authorities) and journalistic investigation is important to hold companies accountable.

Conclusion

The Tesla robot incident serves as a cautionary tale: it shows that advanced automation carries risks, especially when human-robot interactions aren’t fully safeguarded. Despite the technical sophistication of robotics, many dangers come from overlooked basic safety practices: ensuring machines are properly shut down during maintenance, making sure emergency stops are accessible, maintaining safe working zones, and ensuring oversight.

Attached is a news article regarding a Tesla robot attacking a worker at the factory 

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/tesla-technician-robot-lawsuit-21067323.php

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

A Promise Lost Too Soon

Billy Vigar was a young forward who had shown real promise. He joined Arsenal’s academy as a 14-year-old in 2017 and later signed his first professional contract in 2022.  

During his development, he had loan spells — including time with Derby County’s under-21 side and Eastbourne Borough — and also played for Hastings United before signing for Chichester City for the 2025 season.  

He was described as a “powerful and versatile forward” by his former club, Arsenal, who also paid tribute to his passion for the game, character, and the impact he had on teammates and coaches.  

How the Injury Occurred

• On 20 September 2025, Chichester City were playing a match against Wingate & Finchley in the Isthmian League Premier Division (seventh tier of English football).  

• Just around 13 minutes into the game, Vigar went to keep the ball in play. During that attempt, he collided with a hard surface near the pitch (reportedly a concrete or brick wall) after losing his balance, and struck his head.  

• The match was immediately abandoned as emergency medical teams attended to him.  

• Vigar was transported to hospital and placed into an induced coma. On Tuesday after the injury, he underwent surgery in an attempt to aid recovery. Sadly, despite the medical efforts, the damage proved to be too great.  

• He passed away on Thursday, 25 September 2025, in the morning.  

His family issued a statement via Chichester City, saying in part:

“After sustaining a significant brain injury last Saturday, Billy Vigar was put in an induced coma. On Tuesday he needed an operation to aid any chances of recovery. Although this helped, the injury proved too much for him and he passed away on Thursday (25th) morning.”  

They also added how much Billy was loved within the sporting community and expressed devastation that the accident happened while he was doing what he loved.  

Reactions and Legacy

• Arsenal FC released a statement expressing their sorrow, recalling Billy’s commitment to the sport and sending condolences to his family and friends.  

• Derby County also extended their sympathies, as did other clubs and the wider football community.  

• Chichester City, his club at the time, confirmed his passing, requested privacy for the family, and postponed their upcoming fixture against Lewes in light of the tragedy.  

• The Isthmian League announced that a minute of silence would be held before matches that weekend, and players across the league would wear black armbands.  

Many fans, former teammates, and observers expressed shock and sorrow, recalling what might have been for such a young talent and raising awareness about safety, especially at lower-league grounds where perimeter hazards can pose serious risks.

A Life Remembered

Billy Vigar was more than just a prospect — he was a young man chasing his dreams, deeply passionate about football. Though he never made a senior appearance for Arsenal, his journey through the youth ranks and into non-league football was one marked by perseverance and dedication.  

His tragic death is a harsh reminder of the fragility of life and the risks that sometimes come with sport. Though his time was short, the impact he made — to his clubs, teammates, coaches, and the many who followed his career — will not be forgotten.

Attached is a news article regarding billy vigar former Arsenal player dies aged 21 from brain injury 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq5jye4v64no.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Deteriorated Relations, and a Path to Re-Engagement

Relations between Turkey and the U.S. have long been complex, oscillating between cooperation and tension. Under President Joe Biden, some distance emerged due to Turkey’s democratic backsliding, its close ties with Russia, and its controversial military operations in Syria.   One particular flashpoint was Turkey’s 2020 purchase of Russia’s S-400 air defense system, which raised serious security concerns in Washington about whether sensitive information tied to the F-35 fighter jet program might leak to Russia. In response, the U.S. removed Turkey from the F-35 program.  

Under Trump’s renewed presidency, a window opened to recalibrate the relationship. The visit was widely viewed as part of a broader effort to reset ties, especially in the defense, trade, and strategic domains.  

The F-35 Question & Defense Cooperation

A central agenda item was the potential lifting (or easing) of the U.S. ban on F-35 sales to Turkey.  Trump signaled optimism that a resolution could be found. Turkey, for its part, is also interested in acquiring new F-16 jets and upgrading its existing fleet.  

To support such deals, a broad arms and commercial agenda was reportedly in play: proposals for a large Boeing aircraft purchase, local production offsets, and defense-industrial partnerships.  

Geopolitical & Regional Issues

Beyond defense, the two leaders talked about pressing regional challenges:

• Ukraine & Russia: Trump has floated using Turkey’s ties to both Russia and Ukraine to mediate or influence outcomes.  

• Syria & the Middle East: Turkey plays a key role in Syria, and its posture on refugees, Turkish military presence, and alliances in the region all matter to U.S. interests.  

• Energy ties with Russia: Trump pressed Erdogan to reduce Turkey’s purchase of Russian oil and gas, warning that energy trade with Moscow is a point of leverage for the U.S.  

• Gaza & Israel: While Turkey has been critical of Israel’s conduct in Gaza, Trump has expressed openness to working with Erdoğan to broker peace or at least reduce violence. 

Key Moments & Announcements

• Warm tone, cautious language

The public statements struck a balance: Trump praised Erdoğan as a respected leader and signaled willingness to revisit defense ties.   However, concrete results were not immediately announced.  

• Focus on deliverables

Trump was quoted as saying, “He needs certain things, and we need certain things, and we’re going to come to a conclusion. You’ll know by the end of the day.”  He also emphasized Turkey’s influence over both Russia and Ukraine as a possible leverage point.  

Challenges & Skepticism

While the optics are positive, many analysts and critics warned that deep-seated structural issues remain:

1. Congressional resistance — Even if the White House is willing, U.S. lawmakers may push back on restoring defense sales to Turkey, especially given past concerns about Turkey’s alignment and human rights record.

2. Trust & security — The central worry remains whether Turkey, with Russian systems in its arsenal, can be trusted to protect F-35 data and not compromise security.

3. Diverging policies — On Israel/Gaza, Syria, and human rights, Turkey and the U.S. continue to diverge. These areas could become sources of friction in future dealings.

4. Domestic politics — Erdoğa faces internal pressures in Turkey regarding inflation, governance, and regional security. Likewise, Trump’s own political calculations and priorities may limit how far he can go.

Implications & Outlook

This meeting signals a possible recalibration of U.S.–Turkey relations. Erdogan’s presence at the White House, combined with the renewed focus on strategic cooperation, hints at a thaw in a relationship that had grown strained. But whether this visit will translate into substantial policy shifts—or simply high-level symbolism—is yet to be seen.

If successful, reentry into the F-35 program and major defense partnerships could anchor Turkey more firmly in the NATO camp and bring mutual benefits. But missteps could reopen rifts based on trust, security, and regional competition.

In the coming days and weeks, eyes will be on:

• Whether a formal agreement on F-35 sales or compensation is reached

• Whether a defense-industrial deal involving Boeing or Lockheed is sealed

• How Congress responds

• To what extent Erdoğan leans into U.S. efforts on conflicts like Ukraine or Gaza

Attached is a news article regarding Trump meeting Turkish president at White House 

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/white-house-erdogan-seek-deal-with-trump-f-35s-2025-09-25/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Don’t Let Britain Become ‘Trump’s America’: Ed Davey’s Warning at the Lib Dem Conference”

On 23 September 2025, Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey delivered a forceful keynote at his party’s conference in Bournemouth, using the platform to issue a stark warning: under Nigel Farage’s Reform UK, Britain risks becoming what he called “Trump’s America.” His speech drew a clear line between two competing visions for the future of the country.  

The Warning

Davey painted a dystopian scenario, warning that a Reform-led government could:

• Privatise the NHS, or at least dramatically alter its founding principle of universal, free-at-point-of-use care.  

• Roll back gun control laws, so much so that schools might have to instruct children in how to act during mass shootings.  

• Trample basic rights and freedoms, weaken protections under the European Convention on Human Rights, and allow the normalization of racism and misogyny.  

• Let social media “barons” operate with impunity, poisoning young minds.  

• Follow energy and climate policy paths that favour fossil fuels (including fracking) and dependence on foreign suppliers — even citing the risk of paying Vladimir Putin for expensive fossil fuels.  

His repeated refrain: “That is Trump’s America. Don’t let it become Farage’s Britain.”  

Message & Strategy

Davey didn’t simply aim to alarm — he contrasted his vision of Britain with that of Reform UK. According to him, Britain should instead be a country:

• Where everyone’s rights are protected and respected.  

• With a properly functioning, accessible NHS.  

• Tackling climate change seriously and preserving the natural environment.  

• Where the economy rewards aspiration, opportunity is widespread, and the powerful are held accountable.  

He positioned the Liberal Democrats as the centrist, values-driven alternative to both Reform UK’s right-wing populism and what he portrays as Labour’s lack of bold vision.  

The Debate and Criticism

Not everyone accepts Davey’s predictions without question.

• Reform UK responded by calling such claims exaggerated or “madness,” particularly when it comes to issues like gun laws — saying they do not have formal policy to reverse them.  

• There’s debate about whether invoking “Trump’s America” as a warning resonates or whether it risks exaggeration. Some see the rhetoric as necessary in the face of rising populism; others worry about polarisation or fear-driven politics.

Why This Matters

This speech is part of a broader political moment:

1. Populism’s Ambition: Globally, populist politicians like Donald Trump have demonstrated how effective fear, identity politics, and distrust of institutions can be in mobilizing voters. Davey is signalling that he sees a similar risk in the UK.

2. Shifting Political Terrain: The Lib Dems are trying to expand their appeal — not just among their base, but among centrists disillusioned with the Conservatives and sceptical about Labour. Positioning themselves as the bulwark against radical change may help attract those voters.

3. Media & Public Discourse: Using strong imagery — schools teaching evacuations for shootings, children threatened by eroding rights, etc. — helps the message cut through in a noisy political space. But such imagery can also draw criticism for being alarmist or unfair.

4. Electoral Strategy: With the next election looming, parties are sharpening their brand distinctions. Davey’s speech is also a call to arms for Lib Dem members — to defend what he sees as core British liberal values.

Conclusion

Sir Ed Davey’s message is both warning and mobilization: a warning about what he perceives as dangerous political trajectories under Nigel Farage and Reform UK, and a call to mobilize behind an alternative rooted in liberal values of tolerance, decency, and rights. Whether this framing will translate into electoral gains remains to be seen, but the stakes — in Davey’s telling — are nothing less than defining what Britain will become.

Attached is a news article regarding Lib Dem leader saying don’t let farage turn Britain into Trump America 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cjedy22e0yqt

Article written and configured Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Who Are British Adults Who Would Require a Digital ID (“BritCard”)

The proposal under discussion is to create a digital identity scheme (often called “BritCard”) for all adults in Britain. It seems this would apply broadly, including:

• British citizens

• Residents with immigration status

• People needing to verify their identity for work (existing or new jobs)

• Those entering into housing contracts or renting property

• Individuals interacting with government or public services where identity verification is required

• Possibly financial transactions, opening bank accounts, or things that currently require physical ID

So, the “requirement” is being envisaged as universal: every adult, regardless of status, could be expected (or required) to hold and use a digital ID in certain situations.  

What Exactly Is Being Proposed / What Changes

Here are some of the features or ideas being floated:

• The digital ID may be stored on a smartphone via a reworked version of the GOV.UK Wallet app.  

• Employers, landlords, and public bodies (government services) might require it to verify identity, right to work, or right to rent. 

• At least initially, digital versions of driving licences and veteran cards are planned to be among the first credentials in the new government “wallet.”  

• The idea is to reduce illegal migration, prevent fraud (welfare fraud, identity fraud), and streamline access to public services.  

Arguments in Favour

Supporters of the idea argue:

• Improved identity verification: Digital IDs are harder to forge, easier to verify automatically, so can help in ensuring people working or accessing services are who they say they are.  

• Reducing fraud and illegal activity: Could help clamp down on illegal employment, benefit fraud, and misuse of services.  

• Efficiency & convenience: Having a reliable digital ID could simplify applying for services, renting, opening a bank account etc. It may reduce reliance on, for example, physical documents.  

• Addressing identity exclusion: Proponents say BritCard could help people whose identity status is unclear or who find it difficult to obtain standard documents; so it might improve inclusion for some groups.  

Concerns / Arguments Against

There are also serious concerns being voiced:

• Privacy & civil liberties: Many worry about data protection, how biometric or personal data would be stored, potential misuse, surveillance or “mission creep.”  

• Exclusion risks: People with limited digital access (older people, people in areas with poor connectivity, those without smartphones) may be disadvantaged.  

• Potential for pushing vulnerable people into shadows: For example, undocumented or irregular migrants might avoid engaging with services, or working “off the books,” if digital ID becomes mandatory for many aspects of life.  

• Effectiveness doubts: Some question whether requiring a digital ID would really solve the root causes of illegal migration or fraud, or whether it just shifts the burden.  

• Cost, logistics, and security risks: Building such a system securely, maintaining it, ensuring all stakeholders accept and trust it, dealing with data breaches, etc., all present challenges.  

Current Legal Status & What’s Not Yet Decided

• The scheme is not yet law. Legislation would be required. The government and associated groups are in consultation and planning phases.  

• At present the government says digital IDs are not compulsory. But the proposals (and public debate) suggest many practical and regulatory pressures might make them effectively necessary in certain circumstances.  

• The precise scope — what services, what transactions, what data is included, what technical standards — is still being worked out.  

Implications for British Adults

If implemented in something like the proposed form, a BritCard / mandatory digital ID regime could mean for ordinary adults:

• Some loss of anonymity: you’ll need to show your digital ID in more places (jobs, rentals, banking).

• Increased dependency on technology: digital wallets, smartphones, internet access.

• Need for everyone to ensure their identity documentation is up to date / accessible, since if you don’t have established credentials it might be harder to “prove” identity digitally.

• Possible costs (not only monetary, but time, effort) to get set up, especially for those who currently don’t have passports, licensed driving, etc.

• A shift in how personal data is handled: you’ll likely have to trust government-held databases, see how much oversight exists etc.

Conclusion

The idea of requiring British adults to have a digital ID — the so-called “BritCard” — carries both promise and peril. It could streamline many aspects of life, reduce fraud, and make identity verification more robust. But it also raises serious questions about privacy, fairness, inclusion, and the risk of harm to vulnerable people.

Whether this becomes law — and what the final form will look like — remains to be seen. Much will depend on how the government responds to concerns, how the technical implementation safeguards privacy and access, and how seamless the transition is for those who currently lack the traditional credentials.

Attached is a news article regarding British adults require a digital Brit card 

https://news.sky.com/story/starmer-to-unveil-plan-for-digital-id-cards-to-crack-down-on-illegal-immigration-13438007

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Understanding Facial Paralysis: What It Means When One Side of the Face Is Affected

Facial paralysis — a condition where muscles on one side of the face become weak or are unable to move — can be shocking and life-changing. Though it may affect only part of the face, its impact can be physical, emotional, and social. Here’s a look at what leads to it, how people are affected, and what recovery can look like.

What Is Facial Paralysis. 

Facial paralysis refers to loss or impairment of voluntary muscle movement on one side (or sometimes both) of the face. The extent can vary — some changes may be mild (slightly drooping) while others can be severe (fully “frozen” side).

Common signs include:

• Drooping of one side of the mouth

• Difficulty smiling

• Inability to close one eye

• Drooping eyelid or eyebrow

• Problems with speech or eating (drooling, difficulty chewing)

• Changes in facial expression

• Sometimes pain, tinnitus (ringing in ears), changes in taste, or sensitivity around the ear. 

Causes

Several conditions can lead to facial paralysis on one side. Some of the more frequent causes are:

1. Bell’s Palsy

Probably the most well-known cause. It’s acute, often sudden onset, and affects the facial nerve (cranial nerve VII). The exact cause is unclear, but viral infection/inflammation is thought to play a role.

2. Infections / Viral Conditions

For example, Ramsay Hunt syndrome (herpes zoster virus affecting the facial nerve) can lead to paralysis, hearing loss and rash.

3. Stroke

A stroke can affect nerves and pathways in the brain, causing facial asymmetry among other symptoms. However, stroke tends to affect lower face first and often has other neurological symptoms.

4. Trauma or Injury

Physical injury to skull, ear, or face can damage facial nerve.

5. Tumours

Growths that press on facial nerves (benign or malignant) can cause paralysis.

6. Neurological Disorders

Conditions like Guillain-Barré syndrome, syphilis, Lyme disease, some autoimmune conditions.

7. Congenital Conditions

Some people are born with facial paralysis (e.g. Moebius syndrome, which affects facial nerve or nuclei).

Diagnostics

When facial paralysis occurs, medical professionals usually act fast to determine the cause because some causes require rapid treatment for better outcomes. Diagnostic steps may include:

• Medical history, including recent infections, trauma

• Physical exam, assessing which parts of the face are affected (forehead, eyelids, mouth)

• Imaging (MRI, CT scan) to rule out strokes, tumours, or other structural issues

• Blood tests for infection, inflammation, or autoimmune markers

• Sometimes nerve conduction studies

Treatment & Management

Treatment depends on the cause, severity, and how early treatment begins. Some common approaches:

• Steroids: Commonly used in Bell’s Palsy or other inflammatory causes. They may reduce swelling of the nerve and improve chances of recovery.

• Antiviral medication: Sometimes used in conditions like Ramsay Hunt if viral infection is implicated.

• Physical therapy / Facial exercises: To maintain muscle tone, prevent contractures, support symmetry as nerve regenerates.

• Protecting the eye: If the eyelid cannot close, the eye is vulnerable to drying, infection. Measures may include lubricating drops, eye patch or taping closed at night, moisture chambers, etc.

• Surgery: In some cases, surgical interventions may be necessary — e.g. nerve grafting, decompression, reanimation surgeries, or cosmetic/restorative surgeries.

• Psychological support: Facial paralysis can affect self-image, confidence, mental health. Counselling or support groups can help.

Recovery & Prognosis

• Many people with Bell’s Palsy begin to see improvement within a few weeks. Some recover fully, others may have residual weakness.

• Early treatment tends to be associated with better outcomes.

• The degree of recovery depends on how much damage was done, how fast treatment began, the health of the person, and the root cause.

• Sometimes complete recovery isn’t possible, and adaptation is needed (learning to live with partial movement, compensating functions, cosmetic solutions, etc.)

Living with Facial Paralysis: A Personal Perspective

While medical info is important, the lived experience is often harder. Impacts can include:

• Daily functions: Eating, drinking, speaking, blinking, closing eyes, smiling — all can become difficult tasks.

• Social interaction: Facial expression is key to nonverbal communication. Paralysis can affect how others perceive someone, and may lead to self-consciousness.

• Emotional toll: Frustration, depression, anxiety may result — from loss of function, seen appearance, or uncertainty about recovery.

• Adaptation: Many people learn new ways of doing things. Some use assistive tools, physiotherapy, cosmetic fillers, etc. Others find support in sharing their story, community groups.

Why Names Matter — Verifying Information

Whenever hearing about someone named (like Joel Hanson) being affected, it’s important to verify:

• Is the name reported correctly?

• Is the cause identified (medical diagnosis)?

• Are sources credible (medical professionals, interviews, reputable news)?

Misinformation can spread, and giving proper context and respect is essential for someone’s privacy and dignity.

Attached is a news article regarding hunt syndrome 

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/ramsay-hunt-syndrome/symptoms-causes/syc-20351783

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Critics Warn Farage’s Reform UK Message Could Fuel Division in Schools

Education leaders and campaigners have warned that the rhetoric of Reform UK leader Nigel Farage risks deepening social tensions within Britain’s schools. While there is no evidence linking Farage or his party to violence, opponents argue that his emphasis on immigration and culture-war topics could make classrooms more polarised and more difficult to manage.

Teachers’ unions say they have already seen a rise in heated debates among pupils over migration and identity issues, with some blaming high-profile political figures for “normalising” aggressive language. “We’re not saying politicians are inciting violence,” one union official said, “but their words do shape the environment our young people grow up in.”

The Department for Education has urged schools to teach controversial topics “in a balanced way” and to promote tolerance. Reform UK rejects claims that its policies are dangerous, insisting it is simply representing voters’ concerns.

Political analysts note that similar arguments have played out elsewhere in Europe, where populist messaging has been accused of fuelling social friction in schools. Experts say the UK should invest more in civic education and conflict-resolution training to keep classrooms safe and inclusive.

• Concerns from educators – Teachers’ unions and school leaders warn that highly charged political rhetoric on immigration, culture and national identity can spill into the classroom and polarise students.

• Critics link to Farage’s messaging – Opponents of Reform UK argue Nigel Farage’s speeches and policies may normalise harsher language around minorities and migrants, influencing young people’s attitudes.

• No evidence of violence – There is no proof that Farage or Reform UK have incited or caused violence, but critics say rhetoric can create an atmosphere where prejudice and aggression flourish.

• Government guidance – The Department for Education stresses that controversial topics should be taught in a balanced way to prevent tension in schools.

• Broader European pattern – Analysts note similar concerns in other countries where populist leaders’ messages have been accused of fuelling social division among youth.

• Call for civic education – Experts recommend stronger programmes in tolerance, critical thinking and conflict resolution in UK schools to counteract divisive messaging

Conclusion:

While there is no evidence that Nigel Farage or Reform UK are linked to violence in schools, critics argue that the tone and content of their messaging could deepen divisions among pupils and make classrooms harder to manage. Supporters say the party is merely voicing public concerns, but education experts warn that politicians of all stripes have a responsibility to speak carefully about sensitive issues. Strengthening civic education and encouraging respectful debate in schools may be the most effective way to keep young people safe and promote tolerance, regardless of the political climate.

Attached is a news article regarding Nigel farage is a threat to schools massacres 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/09/23/ed-davey-britain-will-have-us-style-mass-shootings-farage/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

“African Tribe” Camps in Scottish Woods Defies Eviction Deadline

Jedburgh, Scottish Borders – A self-styled group known as the Kingdom of Kubala is continuing its occupation of woodland on the outskirts of Jedburgh after missing a deadline to vacate, despite court orders and council eviction notices.

Who are the “Kingdom of Kubala. 

The group comprises Kofi Offeh (36), who calls himself King Atehene; his wife, Jean Gasho (43), who takes the name Queen Nandi; and Kaura Taylor (21), referred to as “handmaiden” or Asnat.  

They set up camp in private woodland near Jedburgh in May. After being served notices, sheriff officers, assisted by the police, removed them from private land. Rather than leave the area, they shifted their camp a short distance—just over a small fence—to land which later was found to be owned by the local council.  

The Legal Pressure & Eviction Deadline

• A sheriff issued a removal warrant on the basis that the group had no legal right to occupy the private land. They were ordered to vacate by 5pm on Monday 8 September 2025.  

• When sheriff officers arrived to enforce the order, the group moved into the adjacent council-owned land, effectively remaining in the woods.  

• A later deadline was set by the Scottish Borders Council to vacate by midday on Monday 22 September. That deadline has also passed without the group leaving.  

• Following expiry of this deadline, legal proceedings to force their removal from the council land are underway. The council plans to seek a sheriff’s order to physically evict them.  

The Group’s Position

• The Kingdom of Kubala claims they are reclaiming land that was taken from their ancestors about 400 years ago.  

• Offeh has repeatedly stated that they feel divinely guided, and have expressed defiance of the court orders, calling into question the court’s legitimacy.  

• The group appears to operate with little use of formal legal representation. They rely also on social media to publicize their cause and to attract supporters.  

The Council’s Response

• Scottish Borders Council, led by Deputy Leader Scott Hamilton, has emphasized that “nobody is above the law.” They say they have repeatedly tried to engage with the group.  

• Legal documents have been lodged seeking eviction and, in some cases, interdiction to prevent the group from re-occupying the land.  

• The council is also confirming land ownership of the site to determine exact jurisdiction if it is indeed council property.  

Current Situation and Implications

As of the afternoon after the council’s deadline, the group remained at the site, with tents, campfires and other equipment still in place. Local officers are preparing further legal enforcement to remove them if they do not leave voluntarily.  

The case raises questions about property law, ancestral land claims, how local authorities handle non-compliance, and how social media amplifies unconventional protest or occupation movements. It also puts focus on what legal protections (if any) such groups might claim under Scottish law, and whether such claims of ancestral land rights have any enforceability in the courts under current legal frameworks.

What’s Next

• The council is expected to apply for a formal eviction order from a sheriff to remove the group from the council-owned land.  

• Depending on compliance or non-compliance, enforcement could involve sheriff officers, possibly with police support.  

• Observers will be watching how the legal system balances property rights, public order, and possibly claims rooted in historical injustice.

Attached is a news article regarding African tribe camping in Scottish woods as the refuse to leave. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7089qr8kjxo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561