Tuesday, 14 October 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband

Shock in Austrian Operating Room: Surgeon Under Investigation After Daughter Allegedly Drills Hole in Patient’s Skull

A serious medical ethics scandal has unfolded in Graz, Austria, where a neurosurgeon is under investigation after allegedly allowing her 13-year-old daughter to drill a hole in a man’s skull during emergency surgery. The case, first reported in mid-2024, raises grave questions about professional boundariesconsent, and patient safety. Below is a summary of what is known so far. 

What Happened

In January 2024, a 33-year-old man was involved in a forestry accident and suffered severe head injuries. He was airlifted to University Hospital Graz in the state of Styria for emergency brain surgery.  

The allegations state that the neurosurgeon allowed her daughter, then 13 years old, to participate in part of the surgery. It is claimed she was guided and even permitted to drill a hole into the patient’s skull.  

According to media reports, however, the hospital and surgical staff deny there is concrete evidence that the daughter performed a significant or unsupervised portion of the procedure.  

The patient survived the surgery but spent around 11 days in intensive care. He continues to suffer lasting effects, including inability to work.  

Legal and Employment Fallout

An anonymous complaint was submitted to Graz district prosecutors in April 2024, triggering a formal criminal investigation.  

By May, the neurosurgeon and another specialist involved were suspended and later dismissed from their positions. Other members of the surgical team are also under investigation.  

The patient learned of the alleged involvement of the daughter via media reports; he was not notified by the hospital or police until after the public became aware.  

Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues

1. Consent & patient rights: A patient under anesthesia cannot consent to a minor’s participation in such a procedure. Whether the patient or next of kin were informed or gave consent ahead of time is not clear. This raises serious questions of medical ethics and legal duty.  

2. Standards of surgical practice: In medical practice around the world, operations are strictly regulated. Untrained individuals — especially minors — are generally not permitted to perform or assist in invasive procedures. Even among trainees or students, protocols demand oversight, consent, and competence. Allowing a child to drill into a skull is far outside standard practice. Critics have noted the extreme risk and breach of responsibility.  

3. Professional accountability: Hospitals and medical boards have duties to ensure practitioners follow ethical standards; dismissals and criminal proceedings reflect the gravity of the allegations. The investigation covers not just the surgeon and daughter, but the whole surgical team.  

4. Psychological and social dimensions: There are broader concerns about what motivated the decision — whether parental pride, ambition, or misuse of authority played a role. Also at issue is transparency: the delay in informing the patient, and the hospital’s communication (or lack thereof) of what had occurred.  

Current Status & What’s Next

The Graz public prosecutor’s office is investigating potential charges of serious bodily harm.  

The doctors involved have been fired; other staff members are being probed for their roles.  

Court proceedings are ongoing. It remains to be definitively established whether the daughter drilled independently, what supervisory oversight there was, and the extent to which standards or laws were violated.  

Reflections

This case has provoked public outrage and professional condemnation. While some reports say that the operation itself was technically successful, the ethical breach is what has captured attention: an unconscious patient subjected to a medical procedure in which an unqualified minor possibly played an active role. Whether or not criminal charges result, the case underscores how essential transparency, consent, oversight, and strict adherence to medical standards are — especially in life-or-death situations.

Attached is a news article regarding a brain surgeon arrest after letting daughter drill in to a patient skull 

https://news.sky.com/story/austrian-surgeon-let-teenage-daughter-drill-hole-in-patients-skull-13203934

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Afghan migrant with AK-47 face tattoo jailed for threatening to kill Nigel Farage

An Afghan national who posted a chilling TikTok video threatening to kill Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has been jailed for five years at Southwark Crown Court. In the video, which was widely circulated on social media, the defendant mimicked gunfire and pointed to a conspicuous tattoo of an AK-47 on his face as he made the threats.  

The court heard that the man, identified in reporting as 26-year-old Fayaz Khan (also known in some reports under other names and social handles), recorded the clip last October while travelling from Sweden to the UK. Khan told viewers he was “coming to England” and used gun-firing gestures while saying he would “pop, pop, pop” Mr Farage — language the judge described as deliberate and designed to intimidate.  

Khan was convicted after a trial of making threats to kill. He also admitted attempting to enter the UK illegally, for which he received an additional concurrent term. Reporting notes a history of offending in Sweden, where he had prior convictions for violent and threatening behaviour. During the sentencing hearing Khan shouted angrily at Mr Farage and at the court, behaviour the judge took into account when characterising the seriousness of the offence.  

Judge Mrs Justice Steyn told the court the video was not mere abuse or bravado but a deliberate, targeted threat of lethal violence. Prosecutors argued the combination of the explicit words, the gun gestures and the visible AK-47 tattoo on Khan’s face made the message “chilling” and a realistic cause for concern about Mr Farage’s safety. Mr Farage gave evidence in court and said he was genuinely worried by the video.  

Sentencing and immigration consequences

Khan was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for the threat plus an additional concurrent sentence over illegal entry. Reports say he is likely to face deportation proceedings after serving his sentence, although some commentators and the defendant’s critics have expressed concern about the possibility of early release on licence — a point Mr Farage highlighted in public statements.  

Public reaction and context

The case attracted wide media attention because it combines a direct threat to a high-profile political figure, the role of short-form social media in broadcasting violent rhetoric, and broader political debate in the UK about small-boat migration and border security. Coverage across outlets emphasised the speed with which the clip spread online and the court’s view that the defendant was not merely seeking notoriety but had shown a readiness to threaten lethal violence.  

What happened next

Court reporting indicates that as Khan was taken down to the cells he shouted at Mr Farage, accusing him of wanting to “use” him politically. The judge said such outbursts illustrated the defendant’s dangerousness and contempt for the judicial process. Officials will now consider deportation and the practicalities of any future licence or early release, which remains a matter for the prison and parole authorities.  

Attached is a news article regarding a man with a tattoo of a AK 47 on his face said he wants to kill Nigel farage 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj97lkmd23po.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Qatar Cannot Own London: The Truth Behind the City’s Leased Land System

In recent years, headlines about Qatar’s vast property investments in London have led many to believe that the Gulf nation is quietly “buying up” the British capital. From landmark buildings like The Shard to luxury hotels such as Harrods and the Savoy, Qatar’s portfolio in London is undeniably impressive. However, the idea that Qatar “owns” London is a misconception — because in most cases, they don’t actually own the land their properties sit on.

The Reality of Leasehold Ownership

Much of central London, particularly in areas like MayfairBelgravia, and Kensington, is built on leasehold land. This means that while investors and companies can buy the right to use a property for a set number of years — often 99 or 125 years — the freehold (the actual land ownership) remains with a long-established landowner, often an aristocratic family or a trust.

So, even when Qatar or another foreign investor purchases a London building, they are typically buying a lease, not the land itself. When the lease expires, ownership of the property reverts back to the freeholder, unless the lease is renewed — often at a significant cost.

Who Actually Owns the Land Beneath London

A surprising amount of central London’s land remains in the hands of centuries-old estates:

The Crown Estate – manages land and properties owned by the British monarchy, including parts of Regent Street and St James’s.

The Grosvenor Estate – owned by the Duke of Westminster’s family, controls large parts of Belgravia and Mayfair.

The Cadogan Estate – holds much of Chelsea and Knightsbridge.

The Portman and Howard de Walden Estates – own large portions of Marylebone and Fitzrovia.

These estates rarely sell their freeholds. Instead, they lease properties for decades, allowing businesses, investors, and foreign governments — including Qatar — to operate within their boundaries but never truly own the land itself.


Qatar’s London Holdings

Qatar’s investments in London are estimated to be worth over £40 billion, spanning prestigious assets such as:

Harrods department store

The Shard

Canary Wharf stakes

The Olympic Village redevelopment

Portions of Heathrow Airport

Yet even these high-profile acquisitions are structured through long-term leases or shared ownership arrangements. The Qatari government and its sovereign wealth fund, the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), hold major stakes in buildings, but not the soil beneath them.

Why the Leasehold System Matters

The British leasehold system is what prevents any single entity — foreign or domestic — from truly “owning” London. It ensures that much of the capital remains under long-term British freehold control, even if foreign investors temporarily manage or profit from its buildings.

In essence, Qatar’s influence in London is financial, not territorial. They may control valuable assets and reap profits from them, but the city’s ancient system of land tenure guarantees that the ultimate ownership remains rooted in Britain’s historic estates.

A City Built on Leases, Not Ownership

While Qatar’s role in shaping London’s skyline is undeniable, claims that it “owns” the city ignore the legal and historical reality of how London’s property market functions. The land beneath London’s gleaming towers and luxury hotels is still tied to British institutions that predate modern finance — a reminder that in this city, ownership is temporary, but history endures.

Attached is a news article regarding Qatar owning most of London through property and business 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36
















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Alec Baldwin Crashes SUV into Tree During Hamptons Trip — Both He and Brother Stephen Unhurt

Incident Overview

On October 13, 2025, actor Alec Baldwin and his brother Stephen were involved in a car crash in East Hampton, New York. The vehicle—a white Range Rover belonging to Baldwin’s wife, Hilaria—collided head-on with a tree after Baldwin said he swerved to avoid a large garbage truck.   The crash occurred amid heavy weather conditions in the area.  

Photos from the scene show significant damage to the front end of the SUV, with the hood crumpled against the tree trunk.  

Baldwin’s Statement & Aftermath

In a video posted on his Instagram account, Baldwin confirmed that he and his brother were “fine,” and expressed regret over damaging his wife’s car:

“To avoid hitting him [the garbage truck], I hit a tree. I hit a big fat tree and crushed my car—my wife’s car. … But it’s all fine. I’m fine, my brother’s fine.”  

He also thanked the East Hampton Police Department—singling out Officer Gerken—and said he would soon travel to Los Angeles to reunite with his family.  

Stephen Baldwin’s representatives issued a statement confirming he was uninjured and grateful that no one was hurt in the crash.  

Context & Public Interest

This accident comes during a period of intense public attention on Baldwin, especially in light of his prior legal and public controversies. Most notably, Baldwin has been the subject of legal proceedings related to the fatal 2021 on-set shooting on the film Rust, in which cinematographer Halyna Hutchins lost her life.  

In past statements and coverage, Baldwin has often addressed his personal challenges in the media. The car crash—fortunately without serious injury—adds another chapter to the narrative of his public life.

Attached is a News article regarding Alec Baldwin involved in a accident 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/alec-baldwin-stephen-car-crash-b2844771.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Apple Unveils iPhone 17: Affordable AI Powerhouse Aims to Reignite Sales

Apple has announced the launch of a new smartphone, the iPhone 17, a lower-cost device that promises to deliver the power and intelligence of its flagship handsets at a more accessible price. The tech giant hopes this move will rekindle excitement among consumers as iPhone sales continue to decline.

The iPhone 17 features the same A18 processor as the more expensive iPhone 17 models, offering similar storage options but a few compromises elsewhere, including a reduced camera setup. Despite these cutbacks, Apple says the device is designed to bring advanced Apple Intelligence features — the company’s spin on artificial intelligence — to a broader audience.

Set for pre-order on 21 February in 59 countries, the iPhone 16e will launch in the UK for £599, around £200 less than the iPhone 16. Though it’s more expensive than the original iPhone SE, its name and pricing clearly echo Apple’s earlier efforts to produce budget-friendly models.

Industry analyst Paolo Pescatore described the iPhone 17 as “one of the most affordable powerful iPhones on the market,” adding that the move “should help accelerate adoption and especially Apple’s foray into AI.”

However, some experts remain cautious about whether artificial intelligence alone can drive a major boost in sales. Apple has invested an estimated $189 billion (£150 billion) in AI development over the past decade, yet has struggled to produce a breakout product in the field.

“AI should be right in Apple’s wheelhouse,” said Cory Johnson, chief market strategist at Epistrophy Capital Research. “But Apple fanboys, fangirls, and investors are right to be disappointed so far.”

One of the most notable upgrades in the iPhone 17 is its new C1 modem, the first Apple-designed modem to appear in an iPhone. Previously, the company relied on chips from Qualcomm and Intel — an arrangement that led to costly licensing disputes. The new in-house modem marks a significant step towards Apple’s long-term goal of owning and controlling the technology behind its products, a vision outlined by CEO Tim Cook as far back as 2009.

Cook described the 16e as offering “the performance, intelligence, and privacy Apple fans expect,” highlighting its AI-powered tools designed to “save time, help you get more done, and express yourself in new ways.”

The device’s Apple Intelligence suite includes features such as AI-assisted writing tools, photo clean-up capabilities, and a smarter Siri integrated with ChatGPT. The company has faced challenges perfecting its AI systems, including a recent suspension of its AI-generated news summaries after the feature mistakenly attributed headlines to real news outlets — a misstep Apple has since corrected.

Analysts believe the iPhone 17 could open new markets and attract users of older models. Dipanjan Chatterjee, a principal analyst at Forrester, said, “The iPhone 17 generates a new revenue stream for Apple, particularly in key markets like India, where iPhones are typically out of reach for most people. Cheaper devices also bring new customers into the Apple ecosystem.”

A marketing graphic on Apple’s website encourages existing users to upgrade, declaring “there’s never been a better time” to switch, while allowing comparisons with models dating back to 2019.

With the iPhone 17, Apple appears to be banking on affordability, performance, and AI innovation to regain its momentum in a fiercely competitive smartphone market. Whether the strategy succeeds will depend on how much consumers truly value artificial intelligence in their everyday devices.

Attached is a news article regarding I phone selling the new I phone at a cheap price today 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The War on Rats in America: Cities Battle an Unseen Enemy

Across the United States, a new kind of urban warfare is raging — one not fought with guns or armies, but with traps, poison, and technology. From New York to Chicago, Los Angeles to New Orleans, city officials and residents are uniting against a common, resilient foe: rats.

A Growing Infestation

In recent years, rat populations in major American cities have exploded. The reasons are complex — climate change, overflowing rubbish, aging infrastructure, and the COVID-19 pandemic all played a part. With restaurants shuttered during lockdowns, rodents were forced out of alleyways and into residential areas in search of food. Once the cities reopened, they didn’t leave.

New York City, long known as America’s “rat capital,” estimates that it’s home to millions of rodents — with sightings up nearly 70% since 2020. In Chicago, the problem is so bad that the city has topped Orkin’s “Rattiest Cities” list for nine consecutive years. Los Angeles and Washington D.C. aren’t far behind.

City Hall Takes Action

Fed up with chewed wires, contaminated food, and frightened residents, cities are declaring war. In New York, Mayor Eric Adams has appointed a “Rat Czar,” Kathleen Corradi, tasked with leading the city’s anti-rodent efforts. She’s coordinating sanitation schedules, deploying new containment bins, and using dry ice to suffocate rats in burrows.

In Boston, officials have experimented with birth-control pellets to limit breeding. Chicago has released feral cats as part of its “Cats at Work” program, where colonies of sterilised cats patrol alleys. Meanwhile, tech startups are developing smart traps that alert pest control teams the moment a rodent is caught.

The Cost of War

The fight is expensive. Cities are spending millions of dollars annually on extermination campaigns, waste management reforms, and public education. Yet, despite these efforts, the rats seem to adapt faster than humans can control them. Experts warn that traditional poisons may no longer be as effective, as some rat populations have developed resistance to chemicals.

Beyond the nuisance, rats pose serious health risks. They spread diseases such as leptospirosis and salmonella, and their presence often signals deeper urban problems — poor waste management, overcrowding, and inequality.

A Cultural Battle Too

Rats have also become an uncomfortable symbol of urban decay. Viral videos showing rats stealing pizza slices or running through subway cars have turned America’s rodent crisis into social media spectacle. Yet, for many low-income neighbourhoods, the issue is anything but amusing — it’s a daily reality that underscores broader neglect.

The Future of America’s Rat War

Experts agree that the only lasting solution lies not in extermination, but prevention. That means cleaner streets, secure waste systems, and modernised buildings. Cities like Seattle are experimenting with underground waste collection units, while San Francisco has launched “zero waste” zones to cut food scraps that attract rodents.

The war on rats may never be fully won, but it’s reshaping how America thinks about its cities — forcing local governments to confront not only the rats beneath their streets, but the human habits that feed them.

Attached is a News article regarding the war on rats in America 

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/569491/new-york-declares-total-war-on-rats

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News

 


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

TikTok Star HSTikkyTokky Arrested After Year-Long Manhunt

Who Is HSTikkyTokky

HSTikkyTokky is the online alias of Harrison Sullivan, a 24-year-old influencer known for fitness, lifestyle content, and high-end displays of wealth.  

Over recent years, Sullivan has generated both a large following and controversy. Aside from TikTok content, he has also been involved in boxing promotions under the Misfits brand.  

The Incident That Triggered the Manhunt

According to reports, the legal trouble stems from a crash in Virginia Water, Surrey, involving a £230,000 McLaren 720S.  

The allegations include:

Crashing the vehicle

Failing to stop and report the accident

Using a mobile phone while driving

Driving without third-party insurance  

One of his passengers, another influencer known as “General G,” was reportedly injured in the crash.  

After the crash, Sullivan was supposed to appear in Guildford Magistrates’ Court in November 2024, but failed to do so.  

That no-show triggered a court warrant, and over the ensuing months, Surrey Police appealed to the public for help locating him.  

The Manhunt

For much of the past year, Sullivan was considered a fugitive. Authorities believed he might have left the country, due to his reported absence from the UK and his social media activity showing locations abroad.  

Despite being wanted, Sullivan continued posting online — sometimes appearing in videos filmed overseas, or making remarks about police investigations.  

Media monitoring suggested that he appeared in videos from Dubai or Qatar, and he also made taunting posts on social media platforms.  

Law enforcement maintained a public appeal for information and urged Sullivan to return and cooperate.  

The Arrest

On 10 October 2025, Surrey Police arrested Harrison Sullivan in Hutton, Essex, in relation to “failing to appear at court for dangerous driving.”  

He was brought before Guildford Magistrates’ Court on 11 October for a preliminary hearing.  

Sullivan was remanded in custody, pending a further appearance scheduled for 14 October at Staines Magistrates’ Court.  

At the time of writing, he has not formally entered a plea, and the court has yet to decide whether charges will be committed to a higher court.  

Reactions & Implications

Sullivan’s arrest has reignited public debate over accountability for social media personalities. Many observers see this as a cautionary tale: online influence and curated lifestyles do not exempt one from legal obligation.

Supporters of Sullivan argue that he was misunderstood, or that he may have been unfairly targeted. Critics, however, view his attempt to evade justice as emblematic of a broader problem where those with platform often believe they can avoid consequences.

The case also raises questions about cross-border influencer accountability, social media as both stage and sanctuary, and the resources law enforcement must dedicate to pursue high-profile individuals who evade court orders.

What Happens Next

Sullivan will face further court proceedings, where prosecutors must present evidence and attempt to commit the case to a higher court if warranted.

His legal team may request bail or contest the charges.

Investigations will probe deeper into the crash, including forensic and witness evidence, the extent of his flight, and any other potential offences.

Public scrutiny will likely remain intense, given the sensational nature of the case and Sullivan’s high profile in the influencer scene.

Attached is a news article regarding HS tikky tok arrested by uk police 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Monday, 13 October 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Parliament Suspended: What Happened in New Zealand

The Incident

On November 14, 2024, during the first reading of the Treaty Principles Bill, the New Zealand Parliament was briefly suspended. This followed a protest by Māori Party MPs who performed a haka—a traditional Māori dance—within the debating chamber. The sequence included tearing up a copy of the bill. 

The rules of Parliamentary procedure were cited as being breached: the haka protest disrupted proceedings, including the formal vote, and was deemed by some MPs to be intimidating in its execution. 

The Bill in Dispute

The Treaty Principles Bill sought to legally define the principles of the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi (the founding agreement between Māori chiefs and the British Crown). Critics argued the Bill would reinterpret or limit established understandings of Māori rights under the Treaty. 

The Bill triggered widespread public protest: tens of thousands marched to the steps of Parliament during its first reading. 

Eventually, the Bill was defeated in its second reading in April 2025. 

The Suspensions

In May–June 2025, Parliament’s Privileges Committee made recommendations for discipline. Three MPs from Te Pāti Māori were given suspensions:

• Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi (co-leaders of Te Pāti Māori) were each suspended for 21 days—the longest such suspension in New Zealand’s parliamentary history. 

• Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, the youngest MP, was suspended for 7 days. 

The rationale given: their conduct “could have the effect of intimidating a member of the House” and breached parliamentary rules. 

Arguments & Reactions

Supporters of the suspensions argue that rules are rules and that the protest disrupted Parliamentary business. Parliament’s Speaker and Privileges Committee said that permission for such actions (like a haka) was not sought, and that certain procedures (e.g. decorum in the chamber) must be respected. 

Critics see the suspension as disproportionate and possibly discriminatory, arguing it’s part of a wider pattern where Māori culture or protest is penalised. Some suggest it suppresses minority voices or cultural expression in political discourse. 

There have also been warnings that this sets a dangerous precedent, whereby majority parties could impose harsh penalties on opposition MPs or minority representatives for dissent. 

Significance & Implications

The seriousness of the disciplinary action is historically notable: prior to this, the longest suspension for an MP was only three days. That underscores how exceptional these circumstances are. 

The episode highlights ongoing tensions in New Zealand around indigenous rights, the Treaty of Waitangi, and how Māori voices are accommodated (or not) in formal political institutions. Cultural-protest traditions (like haka) intersect with rule-of-order norms, and there is not yet consensus on where the boundaries lie.

There are potential legal, cultural, and political fallout: questions over parliamentary rules, whether they need updating; over what counts as “intimidation” in a chamber; and over how minority MPs can dissent while respecting the procedural norms—but also whether those norms respect cultural practices.

Attached is a news article regarding Haka being performed in the New Zealand house of parliament 

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2025/10/13/see-unexpected-haka-halt-new-zealand-parliament/86631616007/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Protesters Interrupt Trump’s Speech to Israeli Parliament: What Happened

On October 13, 2025, during U.S. President Donald Trump’s address to the Knesset (Israel’s parliament) in Jerusalem, two members of the Israeli parliament disrupted the session. The protesters were Ofer Cassif and Ayman Odeh, both from the Hadash party, a left-wing political alliance.  

The disruption took place while Trump was speaking, reportedly during praise for his special envoy Steve Witkoff’s role in Middle East peace efforts. Odeh is said to have raised a sign reading “Recognise Palestine,” and both lawmakers shouted in protest from their seats.  

Security quickly intervened: the two were removed by parliamentary guards. The session paused for a moment amid the disturbance. Trump responded with a quip, the Knesset speaker apologised to Trump, and then Trump resumed his speech.  

The Issues & Reactions

Political Tensions and Symbolism

The protesters’ message—“Recognise Palestine”—points to a long-standing demand from various quarters inside and outside of Israel regarding Palestinian statehood and rights. Their protest reflects ongoing debates in Israel about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, especially in relation to recent events (such as the Gaza ceasefire, hostage exchanges) which were among the topics in Trump’s speech.  

The interruption underscores the presence of dissenting voices within Israel’s own legislature, particularly from the Arab minority and left-wing parties. That these protests occur in the symbolic venue of the Knesset during a foreign leader’s address adds to the weight of the gesture.

Reactions from leadership

Members of the Israeli government and many in the Knesset reportedly responded with applause to Trump, including after the disruption. This suggests strong institutional support for Trump’s visit and his messaging.  

Meanwhile, the protesters’ removal seemed swift and efficient according to reports; the speaker of the Knesset apologised to Trump, and proceedings continued. Trump himself made light of the situation, joking about the interruption before going on.  

Legal/Parliamentary Implications

Under Knesset rules, behaviour that disrupts proceedings can lead to removal, possibly suspension, and loss of speaking or participatory rights. While no legal prosecution appears to be reported (as of these sources), the removal is consistent with parliamentary norms in Israel.

There is also political risk for the members protesting: they can face criticism, loss of standing, or internal political consequences. But for many in the Hadash party and its constituents, such actions are considered part of legitimate protest/dissent.

Wider Context

Trump’s visit comes at a moment when Israel has just reached a ceasefire with Hamas and secured the release of hostages. The speech in the Knesset was largely celebratory from the perspective of those in Israel who support these developments, seeing them as milestones.  

Nonetheless, unresolved issues remain: the status of Gaza, the long-term treatment of Palestinian detainees, the humanitarian situation, and recognition of Palestinian rights. The protest underscores that even within Israeli political discourse, there is strong dissatisfaction over what many perceive as insufficient or unjust treatment of Palestinians.

Significance & What It Tells Us

1. Internal divisions: The event shows that even significant high-profile diplomatic moments are not free from internal dissent in Israel. The presence of Arab and left-wing MPs willing to interrupt and protest signals persistent concerns among minority and opposition groups.

2. Symbolic politics: By disrupting a speech in such a formal setting, the protesters gained visibility—they forced acknowledgment of alternate narratives in front of an international audience.

3. Limits of dissent in formal settings: The quick removal also reflects how institutions enforce order and protocol, especially during foreign leader addresses. There is often a fine balance between allowing dissent and maintaining decorum.

4. Media and public attention: Protests during major speeches tend to amplify the protesters’ message. In this case, the “recognise Palestine” demand reached far wider audiences because of the disruption; this tends to pressure politicians on all sides to address or respond to those demands.

Conclusion

The protest during Donald Trump’s speech to the Knesset encapsulates the tensions at the heart of Israeli politics and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While the official narrative celebrates diplomatic progress, there remain serious disagreements over how that progress addresses underlying issues. The removal of Ofer to Israel and Ayman Odeh demonstrates both the limits of protest in formal settings and the importance placed on maintaining control in institutions like the Knesset. Whether this moment leads to deeper policy discussions around Palestinian recognition (or further repression of dissent) remains to be seen.

Attached is a news article regarding a protestor charges at Donald Trump during speech to Israeli parliament 

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/recognise-palestine-protesters-interrupt-trumps-address-in-israel-parliament-watch/amp_articleshow/124526350.cms

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Inside the White House: A Look Beyond the Famous Facade

The White House, located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., is one of the most recognized buildings in the world. Known as both the home and the office of the President of the United States, it is far more than just a political landmark — it is a living symbol of American history, power, and tradition.

A Historic Residence

Built between 1792 and 1800, the White House has served every U.S. president since John Adams. Designed by Irish-born architect James Hoban, the building has been expanded, restored, and renovated several times, but it has always maintained its neoclassical character.

The White House covers over 55,000 square feet, containing 132 rooms, 35 bathrooms, and 6 levels. It also houses 412 doors, 147 windows, 28 fireplaces, 8 staircases, and 3 elevators — making it as much a functioning home as a historical monument.

The Main Areas

The White House is divided into three primary sections: the Executive Residence, the West Wing, and the East Wing.

The Executive Residence is the central portion where the First Family lives. It includes private living quarters, guest rooms, and several ceremonial rooms such as the State Dining Room, the Blue Room, the Red Room, and the Green Room, each decorated in distinctive historic styles.

The West Wing is the nerve center of the U.S. government. It houses the Oval Office, where the President conducts official business, as well as the Cabinet Room, the Situation Room, and offices for senior White House staff.

The East Wing includes the offices of the First Lady and her staff, as well as the White House Social Office, which organizes official events and state functions.

The Famous Rooms

Among the most iconic rooms is the Oval Office, perhaps the most photographed office in the world. It is both a working space and a symbol of the presidency, featuring personal touches chosen by each incoming leader. The Lincoln Bedroom, on the second floor, is another notable room — named in honor of President Abraham Lincoln and often used to host special guests.

The State Dining Room can seat over 100 guests and is the site of major state dinners. The East Room, the largest in the house, is used for press conferences, ceremonies, and receptions.

Hidden Facilities and Surprising Features

Below the White House are multiple levels, including a basement and sub-basement that contain a variety of facilities — from a bowling alleymovie theater, and gym, to a Secret Service command center. There is also an underground bunker, first constructed during World War II and expanded after the 9/11 attacks, to serve as a secure command post in emergencies.

The Grounds

The White House sits on 18 acres of land, featuring the South Lawn and North Lawnrose gardensfountains, and the famous White House Kitchen Garden started by First Lady Michelle Obama. The grounds are maintained by a dedicated staff of gardeners and horticulturists.

A Living Symbol

More than just a building, the White House represents the continuity of the U.S. presidency and the nation’s democratic ideals. It hosts everything from international summits to the annual Easter Egg Roll, balancing its roles as a family home, a workplace, and a historic museum open to the public.

Every hallway and room within its walls tells a story — of decisions made, leaders hosted, and moments that have shaped the world. To step inside the White House is to step into the living heart of American history.

Attached is a news article regarding inside secret about the White House

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Entertainment/hidden-history-white-house-dives-presidential-secrets/story?id=113177155

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  The  Invisible Wounds of War : The Lasting Pressure Faced by Soldiers Exposed to Explosions ...