Smileband News

Dear 222 News, sponsored by smileband, 

Indian Rapper Lil Blackout: The Rising Star Redefining South Asian Hip-Hop

In a country known for its classical music heritage and Bollywood soundtracks, one name is quickly cutting through the noise — Lil Blackout, India’s newest and most controversial rap sensation. Born and raised in Mumbai, Lil Blackout has become the face of a new generation of Indian artists blending Western hip-hop culture with raw, homegrown street energy.

From the Streets to the Studio

Lil Blackout, whose real name remains largely private, grew up in a lower-middle-class neighborhood where music was both an escape and a weapon. He started rapping in his teens, writing verses about social inequality, corruption, and the struggles of India’s youth. What began as freestyle sessions in school corridors soon became viral hits on platforms like YouTube and Instagram Reels.

His breakthrough came in 2023 with the track “No Filter,” which exploded across Indian social media for its unapologetic lyrics and gritty visuals filmed in Mumbai’s backstreets. The song addressed issues like unemployment, police harassment, and political hypocrisy — topics rarely explored so openly in mainstream Indian music.

A Sound That Crosses Borders

Lil Blackout’s music fuses trap beats, Punjabi flows, and Hindi-English slang, creating a hybrid style that appeals to both Indian and international audiences. His production style has drawn comparisons to American rappers like Travis Scott and Lil Durk, but with a uniquely South Asian twist — local rhythms, samples from Bollywood classics, and hard-hitting lyrics in multiple languages.

Critics say Lil Blackout represents a “musical rebellion” — a voice for India’s overlooked youth who face systemic challenges but still dream big. His tracks often go viral not just for their rhythm but for their honesty.

Controversy and Authenticity

Lil Blackout’s rise hasn’t come without controversy. Some traditionalists have accused him of promoting “Western immorality,” while others praise his boldness for addressing taboo topics like poverty, caste discrimination, and drug use. Despite the criticism, Lil Blackout insists his goal is not to shock, but to speak truth to power.

In a recent interview, he said, “Hip-hop isn’t about pretending. It’s about reality — and in India, our reality deserves to be heard too.”

The Future of Indian Rap

As Lil Blackout continues to gain followers, major record labels are reportedly eyeing collaborations with him. He’s rumored to be working on his debut album, “Blacked Out,” set for release in 2026, which promises to feature a mix of English, Hindi, and regional Indian tracks.

For now, Lil Blackout remains an independent artist — fiercely loyal to his roots and determined to push Indian rap to new global heights.

With millions of streams and a growing fanbase across Asia, Lil Blackout is more than just a rapper; he’s a movement. His journey reflects the rise of a new cultural identity — one that refuses to stay silent in a world that’s finally ready to listen.

Attached is a News article regarding the Indian rap 

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20220609-how-rap-became-a-powerful-form-of-protest-in-india

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Parenting rights for same-sex couples in Italy: banned, restricted — and evolving

Italy presents a complex and evolving legal landscape for gay and lesbian couples who wish to become parents. While many jurisdictions in Western Europe have progressed toward full equality of marriage and parenting rights for same-sex couples, Italy remains far more restrictive — though recent court decisions are beginning to shift the terrain. Below is a breakdown of the key features, legal obstacles, recent developments and what lies ahead.

1. The legal framework and status quo

Civil unions but no same-sex marriage

Since 2016, same-sex couples in Italy have been able to enter into the legal institution of civil unions (Legge Cirinnà) — but not same-sex marriage.  

This matters for parenting rights, because many adoption laws and parental recognition criteria are tied to the status of “married couples”.  

Adoption and parenting rights

• The key adoption law in Italy is Law No. 184 of 1983, which states adoption is generally permitted only for married, opposite-sex couples.  

• Same-sex couples in Italy therefore face legal exclusion from standard adoption and from many parental recognition processes. A 2024 academic study states: “Today in Italy, it is impossible for same-sex couples or single lesbian women and gay men to adopt a child … children born to families with same-sex parents are children of only one legal parent.”  

• Surrogacy is illegal in Italy, and going abroad to use surrogacy has been increasingly criminalised: as of recent legislative changes, Italians using surrogacy abroad may face prosecution.  

Recognition of parenthood in practice

• Some municipalities had allowed non-biological same-sex parents (especially in female couples) to register as parents, or to have “two mothers” on the birth certificate, but this was done on a local basis, not via a clear national law.  

• However, the national government has taken steps to reverse or curb these local practices by instructing municipalities to recognise only one (biological) parent in cases of same-sex couples.  

2. Why same-sex couples face major obstacles

Legal exclusion due to marital status

Because adoption law demands a married, opposite-sex couple, same-sex couples are excluded by definition. This structural exclusion means they cannot adopt together as equals in many cases.  

Restricted access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and surrogacy

• In vitro fertilisation (IVF) and other medically assisted reproduction are legally restricted to heterosexual couples in Italy; same-sex couples cannot access them domestically.  

• Surrogacy is prohibited in Italy and recent legislation seeks to criminalise even Italians going abroad to have children via surrogacy, which disproportionately affects gay men (who often rely on surrogacy abroad).  

Lack of full legal recognition for non-biological parent

Even when a same-sex couple has a child (via foreign MAR or surrogacy), the non-biological partner often faces enormous legal hurdles to be recognised as a parent — sometimes requiring a special adoption route or court decision.  

Political and cultural resistance

The current Italian government under Giorgia Meloni emphasises “mother and father” as the family model, and the government has resisted expanding same-sex parenting rights, seeking instead to strengthen restrictions.  

3. Recent developments: cracks in the wall

Despite the heavy restrictions, a few important court decisions are starting to shift the legal landscape:

• In May 2025, the Italian Constitutional Court (Corte Costituzionale) ruled that a lesbian couple — where one partner carried the child abroad via medically assisted procreation — must have both mothers recognised on the birth certificate. The court declared the refusal to recognise the non-biological, intending mother as a violation of constitutional rights (Article 2, 3 & 30).  

• In July 2025, the Constitutional Court further held that the non-biological mother in a same-sex union is entitled to paternity leave (the mandatory 10-day leave) — recognising her as equivalent in parental responsibility.  

• These decisions mark progress, especially for female same-sex couples, but they do not yet mean full equality for all cases (e.g., male couples via surrogacy) or eliminate all legal hurdles.

4. What still remains banned or uncertain

• Same-sex couples do not have full legal access to adoption together as equal parents in many cases. The default adoption law still demands married opposite-sex couples.  

• Surrogacy remains illegal in Italy, and punitive legislation for Italians using surrogacy abroad is making the situation riskier for gay men in particular.  

• Recognition of parenthood when children are born abroad (via foreign MAR or surrogacy) remains inconsistent and legally uncertain, especially for male same-sex couples.  

• There is no dedicated national statute fully addressing same-sex parenting rights; much remains reliant on court decisions or local municipal practices.  

5. Impact on families and children

• Same-sex couples face high emotional, legal and financial barriers to becoming parents. Many must go abroad for MAR or surrogacy, then engage in prolonged legal battles to receive recognition.  

• Children in these families may lack full legal recognition of both parents. That can affect their rights to inheritance, custody if one parent dies, access to services, or merely registered status.  

• The patchwork of municipal practices means that outcomes vary hugely by city — some local authorities had been more progressive, while national directives are pushing back.  

6. Where things might be heading

• Further court decisions are likely to continue expanding recognition of same-sex parents, particularly for female couples. The Constitutional Court has already taken strong positions in 2025.

• Pressure remains on the Italian Parliament to pass more comprehensive legislation covering same-sex parenting rights — but given political resistance, this may take time.

• Legal activism and advocacy by organisations such as Famiglie Arcobaleno and Rete Lenford continue to push for full equality.

• The risks for male same-sex couples (surrogacy abroad, non-recognition of parenthood) remain particularly high. Unless surrogacy laws or recognition rules are changed, many will continue to face exclusion or heavy legal burdens.

7. Conclusion

In summary: yes — in Italy same-sex couples currently face significant bans and barriers when it comes to parenting. They cannot rely on a clear and equal legal framework for adoption, surrogacy is prohibited, and recognition of parenthood remains precarious and inconsistent. Yet the story is not static. Recent court rulings have begun to chip away at the rigid exclusion of non-biological same-sex parents, especially in female couples. For those writing about the topic, the key message is one of partial progress amid continuing structural limitations.

Attached is a News article regarding gay and lesbian couples banned from having children 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62rmv63069o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Lenny Henry calls for £18 trillion in slavery reparations

1. What has Lenny Henry proposed

Lenny Henry, the British comedian and actor, has co-written a book titled The Big Payback: The Case for Reparations for Slavery and How They Would Work with Marcus Ryder. In it, he argues that the UK should pay out £18 trillion in reparations to Black British citizens and to Caribbean nations affected by the transatlantic slave trade.  

Henry writes:

“All black British people … need reparations for slavery … we personally deserve money for the effects of slavery.”  

He links the legacy of slavery to present-day inequalities such as higher unemployment and the over-representation of Black people in the criminal justice system.  

In the book, Henry and Ryder suggest that reparations need not solely be cash but also include structural reforms aimed at dismantling the lasting institutional effects of slavery.  

2. Why the £18 trillion figure

The figure arises from research invoking a calculation by the Brattle Group (an economic consultancy) which estimated that Western powers might owe close to US $100 trillion in reparatory obligations globally. Henry’s proposal translates a portion of that into the UK context (giving £18 trillion) for Britain’s role in the slave trade and colonial empire.  

Henry’s argument is that because the British government, at the time of abolition, compensated slave-owners (rather than the enslaved), and because the legacy of that history still shapes racial inequality today, a compensation action is warranted now. The book notes that Britain only finished repaying the debt taken out to compensate slave owners in 2015.  

3. How has the public and political sphere responded

The proposal has triggered strong debate:

• Some commentators argue the figure is unrealistic and question who would pay, how it would be calculated and administered.  

• Others emphasise the moral dimension: that acknowledging the legacy of slavery and colonialism is overdue, and that structural inequalities tied to race demand more than symbolic gestures.  

• From the political side, the UK government has so far declined to agree to direct cash reparations. For instance, when asked about monetary payments for slavery, the government said they were “very clear” they would not pay.  

4. What are the implications and challenges

Implications:

• If taken seriously, Henry’s proposal would force a national-scale reckoning with Britain’s colonial and slavery history: economically (huge sums involved), socially (how to define beneficiaries), and politically (public consent, tax burden, legal precedents).

• It also contributes to a growing global movement of reparations debates: other countries, with former colonies or histories of forced labour, are also revisiting the concept of reparatory justice.  

• The proposal shifts focus from simply apologising or memorialising the past, to envisioning material redress and structural change.

Challenges:

• Scale & feasibility: £18 trillion is several times the UK’s annual GDP. Critics point to the practical difficulty of raising that sum and distributing it fairly.  

• Eligibility and definition: The proposal calls for ALL Black British people to be eligible, regardless of direct ancestral ties to slavery. This raises questions about who qualifies and how lineage is determined.  

• Causation and attribution: Establishing a direct causal link between involvement in the slave trade centuries ago and current racial disparities is complex, opens debates about intervening historical factors, and invites push-back from those who argue present conditions have varied origins.

• Precedent and comparability: If Britain pays such reparations, what about other countries with histories of slavery, colonialism, or forced labour? Where is the line drawn? Some critics highlight that African kingdoms and other historical perpetrators are rarely included in such demands.  

• Political will and public support: Given the magnitude and contentiousness of the proposal, securing wide political and public support is a major obstacle.

5. My view and why this matters

Lenny Henry’s call is bold and provocative. Whether one agrees with the £18 trillion figure or not, the real value lies in expanding the public conversation about legacy, responsibility, race and justice. The core questions it raises are:

• How much of today’s inequality is rooted in historic injustice, and what is owed today for that?

• What is the appropriate form of reparations: cash payments, institutional reform, educational programmes, debt cancellation, or a combination?

• How do contemporary societies balance acknowledging past harms with present responsibilities and practical constraints?

It matters because ignoring the economic and social consequences of slavery allows structural inequalities to persist unchallenged. Henry’s proposal raises the stakes: if one accepts that slavery has enduring effects, then the question of “what remedy” becomes central, not just whether a remedy is needed.

In short: this is not just about “paying off” a historic debt — it’s about whether society is willing to act on the legacy of that debt in meaningful, measurable ways.

6. Key take-aways

• Lenny Henry proposes £18 trillion in reparations for the UK to pay to Black British people and Caribbean nations, as part of his book The Big Payback.

• He argues the legacy of the transatlantic slave trade underpins contemporary racial injustice and inequality.

• The figure draws on large-scale economic estimates of liability for Western countries, but is seen by many as impractical and symbolic rather than imminently deliverable.

• The proposal has reinvigorated the debate about what reparations should look like, how they might be funded, and who is eligible.

• Whether or not £18 trillion is ever paid, Henry’s intervention shifts the discussion from apology and remembrance to repair and redress. 

Attached is a News article regarding Lenny Henry call for 18 trillion over slavery

https://coventryobserver.co.uk/news/sir-lenny-henry-calls-for-slavery-reparations-in-new-book-58333/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Man Steals £450,000 from Jewish Charity and Squanders It on Gambling

A man entrusted with overseeing the finances of a respected Jewish charity has been exposed for stealing nearly £450,000, using the funds to fuel a destructive gambling addiction.

The accused, whose name cannot be disclosed for legal reasons, was a long-serving administrator for the charity, which supports vulnerable Jewish families and provides food, education, and housing assistance across London and the South East. Over a period of several years, he allegedly siphoned large sums of money from donation accounts and grant funds, transferring them into personal betting accounts.

According to investigators, the man meticulously covered his tracks by falsifying records, forging receipts, and exploiting the trust of the charity’s management. The missing funds only came to light after an internal audit revealed “serious discrepancies” in the financial statements.

Charity officials said the theft had caused “significant harm” to the organisation’s ability to deliver its community services. “This was not just a betrayal of trust—it was a betrayal of the people we serve,” a spokesperson said. “Donors gave in good faith to help struggling families, not to line the pockets of someone gambling away their futures.”

Court documents revealed that the stolen money was spent primarily on online casinos and sports betting platforms, with little evidence of any being recovered. The defendant reportedly admitted to gambling daily, losing control over his addiction as the financial hole deepened.

Detectives from the Metropolitan Police’s Economic Crime Command described the case as a “calculated abuse of position.” One officer stated: “This was not a single lapse in judgment—it was a systematic theft that drained charitable funds meant for those in real need.”

The man is due to be sentenced next month and faces a potential prison term. The charity has since implemented stricter financial oversight measures and called for greater accountability standards across the nonprofit sector.

The case has sent shockwaves through the community, serving as a stark reminder of how trust and transparency must be vigilantly protected—especially in institutions built on generosity and faith.

Attached is a News article regarding the impact of stealing the from charity 

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f1929ed915d74e62285fb/Fraud_strategy.pdf

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Rapper Ghetts Convicted Over Death of Nepalese Student Yubin Tamang

UK rapper Ghetts, whose real name is Justin Clarke, has been convicted in connection with the death of Yubin Tamang, a 22-year-old university student from Nepal, following a hit-and-run incident that shocked the local community.

The tragedy unfolded late on a Saturday evening in East London, where Tamang, described by friends as a bright and ambitious student with dreams of becoming an engineer, was struck by a vehicle while crossing a residential street. Witnesses reported that the driver, later identified as Ghetts, fled the scene without offering assistance.

Emergency services rushed to the scene, but despite paramedics’ efforts, Tamang succumbed to his injuries at the hospital. The rapper was arrested two days later after CCTV footage and eyewitness accounts linked him to the vehicle involved.

During the trial, prosecutors detailed how Clarke had been driving at excessive speed and had consumed alcohol prior to the collision. The court heard that he panicked and left the scene, only later contacting his legal team once the story broke in the media.

In a statement read by Tamang’s family, his mother expressed deep sorrow over the loss of her only son:

“Yubin came to the UK to study and build a better life. He was loved by everyone who knew him. We cannot understand how someone could just leave him there to die.”

The judge described Ghetts’ actions as “reckless and heartless,” sentencing him to eight years in prison for causing death by dangerous driving and failing to stop at the scene.

Since his sentencing, the music community has been divided. Some fans expressed disappointment and heartbreak, while others urged compassion, acknowledging the rapper’s past struggles and calls for redemption in his lyrics.

Ghetts, known for his influential role in the UK grime scene and hits like “Skengman” and “Know My Ting”, issued an apology through his legal representative, saying he “takes full responsibility” and that “no words can undo the pain caused.”

As Yubin Tamang’s friends at his university held a candlelight vigil in his memory, tributes poured in from the Nepalese community across the UK. Many called for stricter penalties for hit-and-run offenders and better road safety awareness.

The tragedy has reignited conversations about accountability, fame, and justice — and serves as a heartbreaking reminder of how one reckless decision can destroy two lives: that of an innocent young man, and of an artist once celebrated for his voice and vision.

Attached is a news article regarding the victim named in the rapper ghetts incident 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15224191/amp/Pictured-Pedestrian-killed-hit-run-rapper-Ghetts-charged.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Greggs Bakers Under Fire for Declining Standards and Customer Complaints

Greggs, the beloved British bakery chain known for its sausage rolls and affordable breakfast options, is facing mounting criticism from customers who say standards have slipped dramatically across many of its stores. Once praised for its quick service and fresh bakes, Greggs is now being accused of serving lukewarm food, poor-quality pastries, and providing an inconsistent morning experience for thousands who rely on it for their breakfast fix.

Over recent months, social media has been flooded with complaints from regular Greggs customers. Many have voiced frustration about cold bacon rolls, stale pastries, and coffee machines frequently out of order during the busy morning rush. Others have raised hygiene concerns, claiming that some branches appear understaffed and unable to maintain cleanliness during peak hours.

“It’s just not the same Greggs anymore,” said one commuter from Manchester. “I used to grab a sausage and bacon bap every morning, but now it’s hit or miss — sometimes cold, sometimes overcooked, and the coffee tastes burnt. It’s disappointing.”

Industry experts suggest that the rapid expansion of Greggs — now with more than 2,500 stores nationwide — could be contributing to the fall in quality. Staffing shortages, increased demand, and the pressure to maintain low prices may all be affecting standards.

The company, however, maintains that it remains committed to quality and customer satisfaction. In a recent statement, a Greggs spokesperson said:

“We take all customer feedback seriously. We’re working hard to ensure consistent quality across our shops, particularly during our busiest morning periods. Freshly prepared food and great service remain at the heart of what we do.”

Despite these assurances, many loyal fans say the experience that once made Greggs a British breakfast favourite is fading. For millions of workers, school parents, and students who depend on a reliable morning meal, the bakery’s dip in standards has become a daily frustration.

As competition grows from rivals like Pret a Manger and Costa, Greggs faces a crucial challenge — to restore the trust and taste that made it a national institution. Whether the company can regain its golden crust remains to be seen.

Attached is a News article regarding greggs bakers poor standards of service and food 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/food-drink-news/three-greggs-west-midlands-among-31418542.amp

Article written amd configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

President Zelensky Meets King Charles III: A Symbol of Unity Amid Ongoing War Efforts

In a meeting rich with symbolism and solidarity, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky met with King Charles III at Buckingham Palace this week, marking another chapter in the deepening relationship between the United Kingdom and Ukraine. The visit comes as the war in Ukraine continues to test international resolve and as Kyiv seeks further diplomatic and humanitarian support from its allies.

The encounter, held behind closed doors, was described by royal sources as both “warm” and “deeply respectful.” King Charles, known for his long-standing interest in global humanitarian causes, expressed admiration for the resilience of the Ukrainian people. According to reports, the two men discussed the ongoing impact of the Russian invasion, the suffering of civilians, and Britain’s continued support for Ukraine’s reconstruction and defence efforts.

This is not the first time President Zelensky has met members of the British royal family. During a previous visit to the UK in 2023, he met with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and addressed Parliament, receiving a standing ovation from MPs. However, today’s meeting carried an added sense of gravitas, as it came amid renewed fighting in eastern Ukraine and growing fatigue among Western nations over the prolonged conflict.

Buckingham Palace released a brief statement following the meeting, noting that the King “reaffirmed the United Kingdom’s unwavering support for the Ukrainian people and their right to sovereignty and freedom.” While the British monarchy traditionally remains neutral in political affairs, King Charles’s meeting with Zelensky underscored the moral dimension of the UK’s position — one grounded in compassion and international solidarity.

Observers have noted that the encounter also served as a morale boost for the Ukrainian leader, whose diplomatic schedule has taken him across Europe and the United States in recent months. Zelensky has sought to maintain global attention on Ukraine’s struggle, emphasizing the importance of continued aid and sanctions against Russia.

In a brief comment following the meeting, President Zelensky thanked the British people and the royal family for their steadfast support. “Britain has stood with Ukraine since the first day of this war,” he said. “To meet His Majesty is not only an honour but a reminder that our fight is not ours alone — it is for the principles of freedom shared by all democratic nations.”

The meeting concluded with a moment of reflection at the palace, where King Charles and President Zelensky reportedly discussed the human toll of the conflict and the hope for eventual peace. While the path to that peace remains uncertain, the images of the two leaders together sent a clear message: the bond between the UK and Ukraine remains firm, rooted in shared values and mutual respect.

As the war drags into another winter, the symbolism of this royal meeting will not be lost on either side — a reminder that diplomacy, empathy, and solidarity remain powerful forces in the face of adversity.

Attached is a news article regarding Zelenskyy meeting King Charles lll 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cnve57vlrlnt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Elon musk has this future view of robots controlling everything that humans do, aiming that robots think better then the human mind, 

This is impossible and dangerous to the society, we are living in today, humans are the thinking mind of the robot, a robot can never think what a human can do, its is impossible’ as a robot is programmed to understand, what it is told too understand by a human mind, Elon is being selfish and greedy” as poor people today are in a crisis that has developed a mass of mental health. 

The human society is to be continually active, if the human society is not active, they will go brain dead, AI is suitable for things, that are not so important, there needs to be a strict rule that keeps humans acting in the right manner due to there job position. 

AI is for the purpose of business innovation and creativity of Elon’s business venture, and should not be for the benefit of his back pocket to destroy humans active position of making money, you all ways here Elon saying he will make a program that make’s money for people via the stock market, due to the fact that Elon musk is not a Forex trader and can not predict the human mind. 

The stock market is run by the human mind, a computer can never make sense of how the stock market will move” in a direction that is predictable by humans. 

The psychology of the human mind is impossible for a robot to comprehend, as a robot can not tell you to catch a train or drive a car, as this is no different for the stock market. 

It’s all based on IQ, a robot can act as a human by impersonating a human to the extent of what a human is like as a whole, As the human brain is too advanced to understand” as the speed of the human mind can’t relate with the speed of a robots programmed mind. 

Elon wants to make money and not think of the poor people that are suffering, the world is not based around the rich only, they are no different from a poor person. 

Robots can help build for the poor to improve poverty. 

The world has seen competition between these tech giants, as it’s a fact that these tech giants would hope that there product will control the world making every one lazy and stupid. 

This means you might as well make robot’s play football and end human’s playing football, what the different’s” it’s still a game of football that is entertainment for people’s eyes. 

AI can be used to help human’s do there work as a tool’ “like a spanner”, not control the life of a human, as this does not make sense, all these trading robot forex platform are scams, as you will lose your captail, if a robot trades with your hedge fund. 

Elon musk uses a team of people, that have key skills’ to make stuff, as he is the idea of the innovation, behind the idea” based on key skilled individuals that build within his team. 

America has become a nation of greed, as I feel they only think of them self at times, as they are the most intelligent nation next to china on this planet. 

There should be legal restrictions placed on robots taking over the life of a human, as we have a future that would lead to danger within the human society’ due to mental health, as people die because they don’t have a life that fits there required development. 

There would be an increase in crime, a negative response from humans, that would impact people who are innocent, Elon is a great example of a production genius” but he is pushing it too far saying AI robots will control everything in the future. 

This will create war, the poor people are important, they are a life’ that is valued to our society, as some people don’t aim to be rich” but like a life’ that seems to be comfortable, humans hanging on the street’ going crazy” it’s a matter of creating riots, if a robot control the life of a human.  

Elon can not make a trading system, that will make money for people in society, as the stock market is run by humans, Elon will not control the stock market with the mind of a robot, as this is selfish and greedy because is just makes money for him’ in his sense of being profitable. 

Elon comments on racism differences in society, as a billionaire” it is sick to think” as he hold one sided views for a man of his position within wealth, as he should have a better view” if he does not” then he should keep his views to him self, as robots should be limited to what they can do in the world. 

The human communication skill’s are importance, as the future is needed for the development of living peace and prosperity on harmony between humans not robots. 

Elon was kissing robots in a sexual manner, this is not correct for the functioning mind’s of humans, as he feels’ he can make a robot engage in sexual activity with a human, which a lot of people would find disturbing. 

Elon has so much compassion between other people, who are in the tech industry” as they are all fighting to be the best and the richest person on the planet. 

Elon claims life on mars is a possibility, as we find this a joke” As human can not breath on mars, Elon need’s to stop watching fictional movies like “total recall” and understand that life on mars is a joke in a comic book. 

Please understand that robot’s are not the future of the United Kingdom, as humans are” we are a bonded nation” not a piece of machinery that is made out of steel components. 

Elon is intelligent, but as the same time’ he can be extremely witty regarding his sense of direction for humans, as the world is the home of humans not robots. 

There needs to be positive messages to humans, as the youth will grow up with no future, people will be attack and threats, as life will not have the value it should have today. 

The importance of a human life needs to stay in control. Otherwise humanity is dead. 

Attached is a News article on AI taking of everything in a humans life that only gains profit for tech innovation 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/future/article/20240612-the-people-making-ai-sound-more-human

Article written by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Indian Workers Will Not Pay UK National Insurance for First Three Years Under New Trade Deal”: What’s Actually Happening. 

The UK and India have now concluded a long-awaited trade deal that includes a key clause on social security contributions — effectively allowing certain Indian workers seconded to the UK to avoid paying UK national insurance contributions (NICs) for up to three years.

The Deal in Brief

Under the agreement, the UK and India have negotiated a so-called Double Contributions Convention (DCC) which means that temporary “detached” workers sent by an India-based employer to the UK (and likewise UK-based workers sent to India) will pay social security contributions in their home country rather than both countries simultaneously.  

For Indian nationals posted to the UK for up to 36 months and still employed by the India-based employer (i.e., a “detached worker”), the requirement to pay UK NICs is waived — instead they remain contributing into the Indian social security system (Employees’ Provident Fund… etc).  

Why It Matters

This clause has sparked a political storm in the UK. Critics argue that:

• It creates a “two-tier tax system” by giving Indian workers in the UK a tax (NIC) exemption that UK workers do not get.  

• It could make it financially cheaper for UK employers to hire seconded Indian workers (because their employer/employee do not pay UK NICs) which could undercut UK workers.  

• It might cost the UK Treasury significant revenue: some estimates suggest up to £100-£200 million per year in lost NIC receipts.  

On the other hand, proponents argue:

• The arrangement is reciprocal: UK-based workers posted to India will benefit similarly.  

• The purpose is to prevent “double contributions” (i.e., paying into both country systems) which can discourage cross-border movement of labour and hurt bilateral trade and investment.  

• It covers a narrow category of worker (temporary intra-company transferees), not all migrant workers or all Indian nationals working in the UK.  

What the Government Says

The UK government states that the DCC and NIC exemption do not apply to the general migrant workforce or to cases where a worker is intending to stay over 36 months or permanently in the UK. In those cases, UK NICs would still apply as usual.  

The Trade Secretary also emphasised the exemption is not intended to undermine UK workers, and that such conventions exist with around 50 other countries already.  

Key Details & Conditions

• The exemption applies for up to 36 months (3 years) for eligible “detached workers” employed by an Indian employer and seconded to the UK.  

• The worker must be employed by the Indian firm, and continue to pay into the Indian social security scheme rather than the UK system.  

• The worker remains liable for UK income tax (if working in the UK), and pays the Immigration Health Surcharge if applicable—so this is not a full tax/charge waiver.  

• If a worker is intending to stay beyond 36 months, or join a UK-based employer permanently, the UK NIC rules kick in.  

Implications & Controversies

Revenue Impact: The Treasury internal estimates suggest a potential cost to the UK Exchequer of tens or hundreds of millions of pounds per year.  

Labour Market / Employer Impact: Some fear this may give Indian firms an advantage when deploying workers to the UK (cheaper cost structure), though government says the effect is limited.

Political Reaction: The deal has triggered opposition criticism that UK workers are being disadvantaged, and that the government is giving tax relief to foreign-based workers while UK nationals face higher NICs.  

Scope: It is important to underscore that this is not a universal exemption for all Indians working in the UK. It is narrowly targeted. Nevertheless, the perception matters in public debate.

What This Means for Indian Workers & Employers

For Indian firms sending staff to the UK under the intra-company transfer route:

• They may save employee & employer NIC costs in the UK for up to 3 years.

• They must ensure the employee remains on the Indian employer’s books, and remains covered by the Indian social security scheme.

• The employee still needs to meet UK visa/sponsorship rules, salary thresholds, and pay any required immigration health surcharge.

• When the 3-year period ends (or if the conditions of “detached worker” cease), the NIC liability may arise.

What This Means for UK Workers & Firms

For UK-based firms and UK-based workers, the deal raises questions:

• Will UK firms face competition from Indian firms with lower labour cost burdens? Possibly – though the government argues the workforce impacted is small.

• Will UK nationals seconded to India benefit? Yes, under the reciprocal arrangement, but fewer UK workers are in that category compared to Indian firms sending staff to the UK.

• Will this affect immigration volumes? The government says the visa/immigration regime remains unaffected by this tax clause.  

Conclusion

The UK-India trade deal represents an ambitious step in post-Brexit trade policy, aiming to strengthen economic ties, cut tariffs and facilitate cross-border business. Amid the many headline elements (car exports, whisky tariffs, services trade), the national insurance/social security clause stands out for its wide public interest.

Whether the NIC exemption is a clever way to prevent double taxation and ease mobility, or a worrying concession that undercuts UK workers, depends largely on how the scheme is implemented and monitored. The devil will be in the detail — how many workers benefit, how many firms use the arrangement, whether it becomes a favoured route, and how the Treasury revenue impact unfolds.

For now, the key message: this is not a universal NI waiver for all Indians working in the UK, but a targeted relief for a defined class of temporary (up to three years) intra-company transferees. That nuance is often lost in the broader debate.

Attached is a news article regarding Indians not face to pay nation insurance in new trade deal in the uk 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/trade-deal-tax-break-is-not-all-indian-workers-uk-contrary-online-claims-2025-06-09/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Convicted sex offender on the run after mistaken release from prison

Who is the offender

The individual at the centre of this case is Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a 41-year-old Ethiopian national. He was convicted in September 2025 of multiple sexual offences, including the sexual assault of a woman and of a 14-year-old girl. He received a 12-month prison sentence and was also placed under a five-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order.  

Kebatu arrived in the UK in June via an irregular small boat crossing and soon after his arrival committed the offences when staying at a hotel in the Epping area (Bell Hotel, Epping).  

What happened? The mistaken release

On Friday 24 October 2025, Kebatu was mistakenly released from HMP Chelmsford (in Essex) after only 31 days of his 12-month sentence. The release was in error — he was supposed to be transferred to an immigration detention centre and then deported.  

Key facts:

• He was handed a discharge grant of £76 upon release.  

• He left the prison wearing a grey prison-issue tracksuit top and bottoms, carrying a clear plastic bag containing his belongings.  

• A witness (delivery driver) at the prison said Kebatu remained outside the prison for about an hour and a half, visibly confused and repeatedly asking officers for help before being instructed to take a train.  

The manhunt and public safety concerns

Following his release, the manhunt was launched. The Metropolitan Police Service (MET) took over the search from Essex Police, saying they have “high confidence” that Kebatu is in the London area.  

• He was last seen shortly before 8 pm on Friday in the Dalston area of Hackney, East London, still wearing his prison-issue grey tracksuit, and carrying a white bag with pictures of avocados on it.  

• Police believe he has access to funds and has already been seen travelling on trains across London.  

• Authorities are urging anyone with information to dial 999 or contact a police station — they emphasise that this is a public safety priority.  

Systemic failure and political fallout

This case is not just about one person — it has exposed serious issues in prison release procedures. Some of the wider implications:

• In the year to March 2025, there were 262 prisoners mistakenly released in England and Wales — a 128% increase on the previous year.  

• An inspection of HMP Chelmsford in early 2024 found the prison under “considerable pressures”, with staff shortages and high volumes of transfers and releases.  

• The UK Justice Secretary David Lammy described the error as “totally unacceptable” and ordered an urgent independent investigation.  

• The case has added fuel to debates around immigration, asylum-seeker accommodation (such as the hotel in Epping) and public trust in the criminal justice and prison systems.  

What happens next?

• Police continue to scour CCTV across London and transport hubs, particularly focusing on train routes from Essex into the capital.  

• The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HM Prison & Probation Service (HMPPS) are introducing new mandatory checks for prison releases — such as duty governors signing off on releases the evening before, to reduce risk of similar errors.  

• The public have been asked to remain vigilant, report any sightings of Kebatu, and not to approach him. The MET emphasises the best outcome is for him to turn himself in.  

Why this matters

• The man released is a convicted sex offender found guilty of crimes involving a minor. His having escaped custody by error poses a serious risk.

• The incident undermines public confidence in the justice system — especially given high-profile context of asylum-seeker accommodation, protests and tensions in the Epping area.

• The procedural failure shows how over-stretched prisons and administrative back-logs can lead to dangerous outcomes.

• There is a larger policy dimension: immigration, asylum, prison capacity, and the management of foreign nationals subject to deportation.

Conclusion

The case of Hadush Kebatu’s accidental release from HMP Chelmsford, and his subsequent disappearance, is a major wake-up call. It demonstrates how human error and systemic dysfunction in prison release processes can lead to potentially grave consequences for public safety. The continuing manhunt in London remains active, and the political and operational consequences are still playing out.

Attached is a News article regarding a sex offender on the run from Epping after being released from prison early 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx4k2d5yxlo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561