Tuesday, 11 November 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tragedy in Leominster: Man dies after lorry crashes into building

What happened

In the early hours of Tuesday 11 November 2025, at approximately 6.40 a.m., a bin-lorry crashed into a building on Mill Street in the market town of Leominster, Herefordshire.  

The vehicle reportedly carried three people — the driver and two passengers.  

A man in his 60s, who was a passenger, was tragically pronounced dead at the scene.  

The driver and the second passenger were seriously injured and were air-lifted to hospital for further treatment.  

At the time of the crash, the building was empty and no one inside the building appears to have been injured.  

Response from agencies & immediate aftermath

The incident triggered a multi-agency emergency response. The West Midlands Ambulance Service (WMAS) reported receiving multiple 999 calls at around 6.45 a.m. and dispatched a range of units including paramedics, trauma doctors, air ambulance support and Hazardous Area Response teams.  

Hereford & Worcester Fire and Rescue Service was involved, working with local authorities to assess structural damage to the building and secure the site.  

West Mercia Police confirmed a cordon remains in place around Mill Street while the building is declared unsafe and investigators remain at the scene. Roads in the vicinity are closed and local residents have been advised to avoid the area.  

Supt. Helen Wain spoke on behalf of the local multi-agency coordination, offering condolences: “On behalf of all agencies, our thoughts and condolences are with those involved and the families affected by the incident.”  

Impact and local concerns

The crash has raised a number of local concerns:

The structural safety of the building struck — the damage appears significant and the building has been declared unsafe.  

The disruption to Mill Street and surrounding roads, with closures likely to continue for some time while investigations and structural works proceed.  

The question of how a refuse vehicle came to lose control or veer into a property so early in the morning, and whether mechanical failure, driver medical condition or road conditions played a role. Although no definitive cause has yet been released.

The human cost of the incident: a life lost, and others seriously injured. Local residents have reported being awakened by a loud crash and expressing shock at the scale of the incident in a normally quiet area.

What happens next

Investigations will focus on:

Determining the cause of the crash — the condition of the vehicle, brakes, steering, and any possible health issues affecting the driver.

Establishing whether the building’s structural damage was made worse by the collision and whether any further risk to the public remains.

Reviewing the emergency response and cordon, inspection of the scene and subsequent clean-up or demolition work if required.

Support for the family and loved ones of the deceased, as well as for those injured and affected residents in the area.

In conclusion

This is a tragic incident for the town of Leominster, where early morning routines were shattered by a serious crash that resulted in loss of life. The fact that the building was unoccupied likely prevented further casualties. The full details remain to emerge, but the loss of a life and the serious injuries to others underlines the profound impact of road-traffic accidents in any context — even on familiar local streets.

AttachĂ© is a news article regarding a lorry that crashes in to Leominster building 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clykr5ngrg4o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Donald Trump’s Ceremony in South Korea: Symbolism, Strategy and Global Reactions

1. The Event: What Happened

On 29 October 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump visited the city of Gyeongju in South Korea and was formally presented with the country’s top civilian honour, the Grand Order of Mugunghwa.  

The award ceremony took place during his Asia tour (which included stops in Malaysia and Japan) and ahead of the Asia‑Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit.  

At the same time, President Lee Jae‑myung of South Korea gifted Trump a replica of the golden “Cheonmachong” crown, an artefact styled after those of the ancient Silla Kingdom (57 BC – 935 AD).  

Trump remarked during the presentation: “I’d like to wear it right now.”  

2. Significance of the Award & Gift

The Grand Order of Mugunghwa

Established in 1949, it is the highest national order of South Korea, awarded for “outstanding meritorious services in the interest of promoting the development and security of the Republic of Korea.”  

Prior recipients have included heads of state and their spouses.  

Trump is reportedly the first U.S. President to receive it.  

The Crown Replica

The crown comes from the Silla Kingdom heritage (the tomb of “Cheonmachong” in Gyeongju yielded the original) and is symbolic of royal authority and long-term peace in Korean history.  

South Korean officials explained it symbolised “a new era of peaceful coexistence and common growth on the Korean Peninsula” between the U.S. and South Korea.  

3. Why Now? Strategic and Diplomatic Context

The ceremony occurred as South Korea and the U.S. were engaged in high-stakes negotiations on trade, defence, and regional security (for example, discussions about auto tariffs, investments, and the U.S.–South Korea military alliance).  

South Korea may have used this high-profile symbolic gesture in part to reinforce its strategic ties with the U.S., signalling the value it places on the alliance. At the same time, presenting the replica crown and lavish ceremony may reflect an understanding of Trump’s personality and his affinity for symbolic “big gestures”.  

The use of Gyeongju (ancient capital of Silla) rather than Seoul adds a cultural and historic dimension — linking modern diplomacy with Korea’s long heritage.  

4. Reactions and Interpretations

Positive / official stance

Official statements emphasised Trump’s role as a “peacemaker” on the Korean Peninsula and credited his previous engagements with North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un as part of the rationale.  

For Trump, this award offers both prestige and a symbolic boost ahead of other diplomatic engagements (notably with China).

Criticism & public debate

Some observers viewed the ceremony as over-the-top or pandering, noting the crown gift’s regal overtones in light of protests in the U.S. against Trump’s perceived authoritarian style.  

Critics questioned the value of the award if it is seen as part of diplomacy rather than a strictly merit-based recognition. For example:

“What is the honour in honour of? … If it is just because he showed up?”  

There were also concerns about optics: balancing alliance obligations with U.S. demands, and South Korea’s need to manage its relations with both the U.S. and China.  

5. Broader Implications

The event underscores how symbolic diplomacy (medals, crowns, ceremonies) remains important in modern international relations — especially when personality and image matter.

It also reflects the changing nature of U.S.–South Korea relations: from purely security-first to a more diversified mix of trade, cultural diplomacy, and alliance management.

For Trump, the award could serve as a domestic political tool, reinforcing his image internationally and appealing to supporters who value recognitions of “greatness” or “global status”.

For South Korea, the gesture may help secure favourable terms in trade/defence deals, but also risks domestic backlash if perceived as overly flattering without sufficient reciprocal benefit.

6. What to Watch

Will the grand symbolism translate into tangible outcomes (trade deals, defence cooperation, naval technologies) or remain largely ceremonial?

How will North Korea respond (if at all) to this message of U.S.–South Korea unity and symbolism of peace on the peninsula?

Will the public and media in South Korea give sustained attention to this award, or view it as a one-off spectacle?

How will China perceive the ceremony, especially given South Korea’s efforts to balance relations with both the U.S. and China?

Attached is a news article regarding trump receiving the highest awarded by South Korea 

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-korea-award-trump-its-highest-medal-gift-him-golden-crown-2025-10-29/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband

Trump Influencer Rein Lively Appeals Conviction Over Alleged Assault and Racial Abuse in London

American social media influencer and outspoken Donald Trump supporter, Rein Lively, is at the centre of a high-profile legal battle in London after launching an appeal against her conviction for alleged assault and racial abuse stemming from an incident earlier this year.

Lively, who rose to online prominence for her fiery political commentary and unwavering support of former U.S. President Donald Trump, was accused of verbally abusing a passer-by and assaulting a woman outside a hotel in central London during a heated confrontation.

According to court documents, the alleged altercation took place in June when Lively was visiting the capital for a political networking event. Witnesses claimed she became aggressive after an exchange of words turned confrontational, allegedly shouting racist remarks and striking one of the individuals involved.

Lively has consistently denied the allegations, maintaining that she acted in self-defence and that her comments were “taken out of context” during a chaotic scene captured on bystanders’ phones. Her legal team argues that she was unfairly portrayed by the media due to her political affiliations and online reputation as a far-right commentator.

In a statement released through her representatives, Lively said:

“I have been misrepresented and vilified because of my political beliefs. I look forward to clearing my name and showing the truth in court.”

The appeal hearing, held at Southwark Crown Court this week, drew attention from both British and American media, with supporters and critics gathering outside. Some of Lively’s followers held placards reading “Justice for Rein” while counter-protesters accused her of spreading hate and division.

Legal experts say the case highlights the tension between freedom of expression and hate speech laws in the UK, particularly when international figures known for controversial online rhetoric face allegations abroad.

The court has yet to reach a verdict on the appeal, with proceedings expected to continue later this month.

If the conviction is upheld, Lively could face a suspended prison sentence and a permanent ban from entering the UK.

Attached is a news article regarding rein lively a political consultant who is subjected over alleged assault and racial abuse in London 

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/police-appeal-racial-incident-identity-5HjdGhH_2/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36
















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Latest UK parcel‑theft news

An alarming surge in doorstep thefts

In the year to June 2025, a staggering £666 million worth of parcels were stolen from UK doorsteps, according to data compiled from 27 police forces by parcel-locker firm Quadient. That represents an increase of about £290 million compared with the previous 12 months.  

While the exact number of parcels stolen is harder to pin down (many go unreported), the value and scale point to what many are calling a “porch-piracy” epidemic.

What we know

The average value of stolen parcels is rising: one study found it climbed from £66.50 in one year to £102 in the next.  

Flats and communal buildings appear to be more vulnerable: thefts from multi-unit dwellings are over-represented.  

A notable chunk of these thefts are never reported to police, meaning the official statistics likely under-represent the true scale.  

Younger adults (22-34) appear especially at risk, often because parcels are left unattended when people are working. 



Why this is happening

A number of factors combine to create the perfect storm:

Online shopping is at record highs; more parcels = more targets.

Deliveries are often left unattended on doorsteps or in communal lobbies, providing easy pickings for theft.

Delivery optimisation pressures can mean parcels arrive when nobody’s home, or are left in less-secure locations.

Criminals recognise the opportunity: low risk, potentially high reward. For many thefts, the odds of getting caught are low.

The value of items is rising (tech, fashion, etc), so more incentive for thieves.

Consequences & repercussions

Consumers lose money, time and trust in home-delivery.

Retailers and couriers face cost burdens—whether through replacements, insurance, or reputational damage.

The thefts add to broader issues of crime, security and home-logistics.

Increased insecurity may change how people order goods (e.g., fewer home deliveries, more locker use) or alter behaviour (installing cameras, redirecting deliveries).

Some neighbourhoods risk higher crime perception and reduced community trust.

What can be done: steps for consumers

Here are practical measures to reduce risk:

Request signature on delivery or use delivery instructions (safe place, neighbour, etc).

Use parcel-lockers, collection points or delivery to workplace if home might be unattended.

Install a video doorbellCCTV or security lighting.

Have parcels delivered when someone is home, or schedule a slot.

For flats, ask management for secure parcel-drop areas rather than leaving in lobbies.

Retain order/tracking info; if a parcel is marked “delivered” but missing, contact the retailer.

Report thefts to police where appropriate (even if low recovery rates), and inform the seller/retailer.

The bigger picture

The £666 million figure underscores that doorstep theft is far more than a nuisance—it’s a widespread crime impacting millions of people, and the ecosystem of retail, delivery and housing needs to adapt. It raises questions about industry practices (how safe are current drop-off protocols?), regulatory oversight, and whether more systemic solutions (secure delivery infrastructure, improved parcel tracking, shared responsibility between retailer/courier) are needed.

Attached is a news article regarding £666 million parcel have be stolen from door steps in the uk 

https://www.itv.com/watch/news/pound666-million-worth-of-parcels-stolen-from-doorsteps-new-research-reveals/0prc5wm

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband 

Michael Leiters

A strategic return to the wheel: Leiters named CEO of Porsche AG

German car-maker Porsche has announced that Michael Leiters, the former boss of McLaren Automotive, will assume the role of Chief Executive Officer of Porsche on 1 January 2026, succeeding Oliver Blume.  

Leiters will take over at a critical moment for Porsche as it faces multiple headwinds: a declining Chinese market, tariffs on U.S. exports, and the complex pivot to electrification.  

1. Leiters’ rĂ©sumĂ©: engineering roots and senior leadership

Michael Leiters has a strong technical and engineering background, holding a doctorate in engineering and a mechanical engineering diploma from RWTH Aachen University.  

He spent 13 years at Porsche (2000-2013) in roles including project manager for the Cayenne hybrid, product line director for the Macan/Cayenne ranges and executive assistant to the CEO.  

From 2014-2019, he served as Chief Technology Officer at Ferrari N.V., helping develop its first hybrid production models (SF90 Stradale296 GTB).  

In July 2022, he took over as CEO of McLaren Automotive, steering the firm through launches including the 750S before stepping down in April 2025 after a merger with EV start-up Forseven.  

This mix of technical depth + senior leadership across premium automakers gives Leiters a rare profile: someone who knows how to build both cars and organizations.

2. Why Porsche is bringing him in

Several developments made this leadership transition both necessary and strategic:

Oliver Blume had held the dual role of CEO of Porsche and CEO of the Volkswagen Group for the past three years. That dual burden drew criticism from investors and unions who argued the Porsche role deserved full-time focus.  

Porsche’s performance has flagged: weakening demand in China, U.S. tariffs, and the cost of its EV push have squeezed margins. The company announced ~3,900 job cuts earlier this year.  

The supervisory board judged that a new single-minded CEO was needed to lead Porsche through the next phase. Leiters’ background at Porsche, Ferrari and McLaren puts him in a strong position to understand both brand heritage and future challenges.  

In short: Porsche is seeking a reset. Leiters offers both continuity (he knows Porsche well) and new leadership.

3. Challenges ahead for Leiters

When he takes over in January 2026, Leiters will step into a landscape with big questions:

Electrification strategy: Porsche’s EV ambitions have come under pressure. The company recently shifted emphasis back to hybrids and combustion in some markets.  

China & global demand: China is a key battleground for luxury car makers. Slowing demand there, plus U.S. trade/tariff pressure, make the global market less predictable.  

Margins and cost control: Premium automakers are feeling margin pressure from rising raw material and development costs, especially EVs. Porsche will need to defend its premium positioning while managing costs.

Brand identity: Porsche has a deeply-rooted sports car legacy. As model lines expand (SUVs, crossovers, electrified variants), maintaining the balance between volume growth and brand exclusivity will be tricky.

Leiters’ experience with SUVs (Cayenne/Macan) and hybrids at Porsche, as well as his time at Ferrari and McLaren, give him the skill-set — but execution will be critical.

4. What this means for Porsche (and Volkswagen)

Blume will continue as CEO of Volkswagen Group, relinquishing his Porsche role to focus solely on the broader group.  

For Porsche: Having a dedicated CEO means sharper strategic focus at the brand. It signals to investors and the market that Porsche is addressing its internal governance and strategic drift.

For Volkswagen Group: The separation may help bring clearer accountability and stronger brand autonomy at Porsche, which could improve responsiveness to the luxury/performance car market.

For the luxury/automotive sector: The move highlights the trend of recruiting leaders who are both technically grounded and commercially savvy — engineers who can lead businesses, not just build cars.


5. Final thoughts

Michael Leiters’ appointment as CEO of Porsche is a strong signal. It says: “We’re serious about the next phase”. He brings a unique mix of legacy knowledge (Porsche roots) and fresh leadership (McLaren, Ferrari) at a time when Porsche’s future is far from guaranteed.

However — the road ahead is steep. The luxury-performance sector is under pressure: electrification, changing consumer behaviour, global market shifts. Whether Leiters can navigate Porsche through this will depend as much on culture, execution and strategy as on his pedigree.

If I were advising accordingly: keep an eye on his first 100 days — how quickly he defines a clear vision for Porsche’s electrification roadmap, how he restructures model lines, how he communicates with investors and employees. The transition is symbolic — but the real test will be what he delivers by 2028.

Attache is a news article regarding the boss of McLaren becoming boss of Porsche 

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/porsche-supervisory-board-agrees-successor-ceo-blume-bild-reports-2025-10-17/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Monday, 10 November 2025

Smileband News


Abby Zwerner

Summary

A jury in Virginia has awarded $10 million in a civil case brought by former first-grade teacher Abby Zwerner, who was shot by a 6-year-old student in January 2023.  

What happened

On 6 January 2023, at Richneck Elementary School in Newport News, Virginia, a six-year-old boy — whose identity is protected — brought a 9 mm handgun from home into his classroom and shot his teacher, Abby Zwerner. The bullet struck her through her raised hand, then into her chest, where it remains.  

Zwerner, who was teaching first grade at the time, had evacuated her students even after being hit, was hospitalised for nearly two weeks, underwent several surgeries, and continues to suffer from permanent injury to her left hand and emotional trauma.  

The lawsuit

Zwerner filed a civil lawsuit in April 2023 against the former assistant principal of the school, Ebony Parker, alleging gross negligence. She claimed Parker ignored multiple warnings on the day of the shooting that the boy had a gun, failed to investigate those warnings or remove the threat, and thereby breached her duty to protect staff and students.  

Parker’s defence argued the incident was “unthinkable” and “unprecedented” — that no reasonable school official could have foreseen a 6-year-old bringing a gun to class and shooting a teacher.  


The verdict

On 6 November 2025, after a six-day trial and about five and a half hours of jury deliberation, a Newport News jury returned a verdict in favour of Zwerner, awarding her $10 million in damages.  

It is reported that Zwerner had sought approximately $40 million.  

The jury found that Parker acted with gross negligence by failing to act on credible reports that a student had a firearm.  

Why the case matters

It highlights the extreme breach of school safety protocols and raises questions about accountability at the level of administration when warnings are given.

The case may set precedent for civil liability of school officials when there are prior warnings of violent threats from students.

It draws attention to the issue of firearms accessibility to very young children in homes, and the intersection of home storage practices, parental responsibility and school safety.  

It underscores the long-term physical and emotional toll on educators from gun violence in schools.

Aftermath

Zwerner has not returned to teaching; she has become a licensed cosmetologist and does not plan to return to the classroom, citing ongoing anxiety, PTSD and physical limitations.  

Parker faces separate criminal trial charges of child neglect in connection with the shooting.  

The student’s mother, Deja Taylor, was previously sentenced to 21 months in prison in 2023 on federal gun-related offences and child neglect.  

Broader context & reactions

Many school officials across the U.S. and experts in school security say this verdict sends a strong message: once credible warnings are received that a student has a weapon, administrators must act — simply “see something, say something” is not sufficient.  

Advocacy groups for safe gun storage have pointed to this incident as further evidence of the danger posed when firearms in homes with children are not secured, noting that many school shooters obtain their weapons from home or relatives.  

What’s next

The $10 million award may be subject to appeal by Parker or by the insurance/School Board.  

The criminal case against Parker is pending, which could add further consequences for school leadership breaches.

The case may trigger policy reviews in school districts about how warning reports from staff and students are handled, and how risk is assessed when very young children show signs of violence.

It may influence legal standards on administrator liability in analogous cases where children bring weapons to schools.

Conclusion

The verdict in favour of Abby Zwerner marks a landmark civil judgment in a rare and shocking school-shooting incident involving a 6-year-old. It reflects not only on the devastating personal impact on one teacher but on systemic questions of how schools, administrators, and parents respond to early warning signs of violence, and the stakes of accountability when prevention fails.

Attached is a news article regarding a Virgina school teacher who was shot by a 6 year old awarded 10 million dollars 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy5q7ygx14zo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tragic incident in Birmingham city centre

A young woman, Katie Fox, aged 34, has died after being stabbed in the neck during what police have described as an “unprovoked attack” in the heart of Birmingham city centre.  

The incident occurred shortly before 9pm on Friday 7 November on Smallbrook Queensway — a busy road adjacent to the main shopping area and transport links in Birmingham.  Ms Fox was taken to hospital in critical condition and, despite the efforts of medical staff, she subsequently died of her injuries.  

The suspect and legal proceedings

A suspect, 21-year-old Djeison Rafael of Smethwick, has been charged in connection with the attack. Initially, he was charged with attempted murder; however, following Ms Fox’s death the charge was upgraded to murder.  

Additional charges include two counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm (relating to earlier dates), possession of a Stanley knife/blade, and assaulting a detention escort officer.  During his appearance at Birmingham Magistrates Court, Rafael interrupted proceedings repeatedly and was remanded in custody, with the case sent to the Crown Court for hearings on 12 November.  

Investigation details and police appeal

The West Midlands Police (WMP) say that they believe the attack was unprovoked and that no other suspects are being sought at this stage.   They have released details of the suspect’s clothing to assist with enquiries: on the evening of the attack he was reportedly wearing an all-grey tracksuit, black hat, trainers and carrying a rucksack.  

In response to the incident and the public concern it has generated, extra police patrols have been deployed in the city-centre area to reassure the public.  Anyone who witnessed the incident, or has relevant video or information, is being asked to contact WMP via their major incident portal or by phone quoting log 5503 of 7 November.  

Impact and community response

The news has sent shockwaves through Birmingham’s city centre and local communities. Many have described the attack as horrifying and senseless. The fact that the victim was stabbed in such a public, busy location has raised serious concerns about street safety, especially in central urban areas during the evening.

Local neighbours of Ms Fox’s family home (in Northfield, Birmingham) expressed their devastation, stating that although she had moved out of the family home a few years ago, she was known, well-liked, and the attack has left a void in the community.  

Broader issues and questions raised

This tragic incident raises several broader issues that merit attention:

Public-space safety: The attack took place on a busy thoroughfare outside one of Birmingham’s main stations and shopping districts. How safe are urban public spaces during evening hours, and what more can be done to deter such sudden acts of violence?

Knife crime and carry of blades: The suspect was charged with possession of a blade in a prior incident. This underlines the ongoing challenge of knife-crime in the UK and the enforcement/prevention measures that may be needed.

Victim protection and bystander support: In cases of sudden, unprovoked attack, immediate emergency response and bystander intervention can be critical. The public may benefit from increased awareness about how to respond safely in such situations.

Police visibility vs. community reassurance: The deployment of extra officers is intended to reassure, but longer-term strategies may be needed to maintain public confidence, especially after high-profile incidents.

Media and societal reaction: There is always a fine line between reporting necessary facts and sensationalism. Sensitivity to the victim and her family must remain paramount while ensuring public information is accurate and helpful.

Conclusion

Katie Fox’s death following this shocking attack is a stark reminder of the fragility of safety in public urban environments and the devastation that acts of violence bring not just to individuals and families, but to entire communities. As the legal process moves to the Crown Court, the questions raised by this incident — about prevention, public space security, and community resilience — remain urgent.

Attached is a news article regarding Katie fox who was stabbed in the neck at Birmingham city centre 

Attached is a News article regarding Kate fox who was stabbed in the neck at Birmingham city centre 

https://news.sky.com/story/woman-34-has-died-after-being-stabbed-in-the-neck-in-birmingham-13467841

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tim Westwood Granted Conditional Bail Following Court Appearance

Veteran DJ and former BBC Radio 1 presenter Tim Westwood has been granted conditional bail following a court appearance earlier this week. The decision was made after magistrates reviewed arguments from both the prosecution and defence regarding the ongoing investigation into serious allegations against the 66-year-old.

While full details of the case have not been disclosed for legal reasons, it is understood that Westwood’s bail conditions include strict reporting requirements, travel restrictions, and a ban on contacting certain individuals connected to the investigation.

The presiding magistrate stressed that granting bail does not imply guilt or innocence, but ensures Westwood remains available for future hearings while the investigation continues.

A spokesperson for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) confirmed that the matter remains active, stating:

“The bail conditions are in place to safeguard those involved and ensure that the integrity of the ongoing legal process is maintained.”

Westwood, who appeared calm and composed throughout the hearing, did not make any public comments as he exited the courthouse. His legal team said he intends to fully comply with all bail conditions and assist with the ongoing inquiries.

The case is expected to return to court later this month for a further procedural hearing, where additional evidence may be reviewed.

Authorities have reminded the public to avoid speculation while proceedings are ongoing, underscoring that every defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Attached is a news article regarding Tim Westwood granted conditional bail 

https://news.sky.com/story/tim-westwood-granted-bail-after-court-appearance-on-rape-and-sexual-assault-charges-13467946

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36






Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband

15-Day Cold & Snow Alert Forecast for London Region

Overview

In the coming fortnight, the weather around the London area will gradually transition from mild, wet autumnal conditions into colder, more wintry terrain. While significant snowfall is unlikely within the city limits, lower overnight temperatures and several rain-to-sleet transitions raise the risk of slippery surfaces, frost, and wintry hazards. This serves as an early alert for residents, drivers, and outdoor workers to prepare accordingly.

Days 1-4 (Mon 10-Thu 13 Nov) – Mild but Damp

Mon 10: Periods of rain, high around 13 °C, low around 9 °C.

Tue 11 & Wed 12: Largely cloudy, briefly milder (highs ~16 °C), lows ~13 °C.

Thu 13: Low-lying clouds dominate, high ~16 °C, low ~11 °C.

Implications:

Wet conditions dominate early-week, keeping pavements slick. Although not cold yet, the dampness may mask underlying chill. Keep waterproof footwear and be cautious during the darker, wetter mornings.

Days 5-8 (Fri 14-Mon 17 Nov) – Cooling Off, Risk of Frost

Fri 14: Occasional morning rain, then cloudy; high ~12 °C, low ~8 °C.

Sat 15: Partly sunny, high ~12 °C, low ~5 °C.

Sun 16: Sunshine returns, high ~10 °C, low ~4 °C.

Mon 17: Increasing cloudiness, high ~10 °C, low ~5 °C.

Implications:

A marked drop in overnight temperatures means the first frosts are possible, particularly on Sat/Sun nights when lows reach ~4-5 °C. Although still above freezing, bridging into near-freezing overnight for some sheltered spots. Prepare warm clothing and watch out for icy patches early mornings.

Days 9-15 (Tue 18-Mon 24 Nov) – Cold Regime Sets In

Tue 18: A little morning rain, then low clouds; high ~9 °C, low ~4 °C.

Wed 19: Low clouds breaking for sun; high ~9 °C, low ~5 °C.

Thu 20: Mostly sunny; high ~10 °C, low ~5 °C.

Fri 21: Rain returns; high ~9 °C, low ~5 °C.

Sat 22: Rain at times; high ~9 °C, low ~4 °C.

Sun 23: Cloudy with afternoon rain; high ~8 °C, low ~2 °C.

Mon 24: Partly sunny; high ~10 °C, low ~0 °C.

Implications:

This period introduces colder days and significant overnight freezing risk. Low temperatures drop to ~2-0 °C by Monday 24th. While heavy snow is not forecasted, the cold combined with rain events and subsequent freezing could cause ice buildup on roads and pavements. Slushy mixes or sleet are possible in transitional periods (especially Tue/Wed when highs are ~9-10 °C but lows fall near 4-5 °C). On Sun 23rd and Mon 24th, there’s greater risk of night-time freezing, meaning frost and black ice in the early hours — particularly hazardous for motorists and pedestrians.

Key Alerts & Preparedness Tips

Early frost/ice: Especially on nights from Sat 15 onwards — wrap up early, de-ice plants, protect vehicles.

Driving caution: From midnight to ~09:00 in the cold regime phase the roads may be icy even though no heavy snowfall is predicted.

Footpath hazard: Pavements may be wet then freeze overnight; consistent slippers or non-slip footwear and ensuring lighting is good helps.

Rain-to-freeze transitions: Rain falling on already cold ground (especially towards Sun 23/Mon 24) could lead to sleety patches or thin ice rather than snow accumulation.

No heavy snow expected: While winter conditions are setting in, the forecast doesn’t show major snow-events for central London—visibility will remain good compared to heavy snow zones, but night-time freezing is the main hazard.

What This Means for You

For residents around London (including areas like Ramsgate and the wider Kent coast), this forecast underlines a shift from matter-of-fact autumn dampness into genuine winter-mode conditions. Although you’re unlikely to wake up to snow-drifts in the city, freezing nights, icy mornings, and the possibility of sleet are now real concerns. Plan accordingly:

Check vehicle tyres and de-icing supplies.

Clear driveways or outdoor equipment of rainwater before night-time freeze.

Dress in layers (daytime highs in low 10s °C, nights near 0 °C).

If travelling early mornings late in the period (from ~24th), allow extra time for ice-hazard.

Keep an eye on local forecasts and alerts — conditions can shift quickly in cold regimes.

Attached is a news article regarding cold & snow alert Europe 15 days weather forecast 

https://opensnow.com/dailysnow/europe

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Donald Trump Threatens BBC with Legal Action Over “False and Defamatory” Coverage

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has reportedly sent a formal letter to the BBC threatening legal action over what he describes as “false, defamatory and politically motivated” coverage of his recent political activities and business dealings.

The letter, sent by Trump’s legal team earlier this week, accuses the British broadcaster of airing “misleading and inaccurate” reports that allegedly damaged his reputation and interfered with his ongoing campaign to return to the White House.

According to sources close to the matter, the dispute stems from a BBC segment aired last month that examined Trump’s ongoing legal troubles and their potential impact on the 2026 U.S. election. Trump’s lawyers claim the report “intentionally misrepresented” key facts and presented unverified claims as evidence.

In the letter, Trump’s attorney is believed to have demanded an immediate public retraction and apology, warning that failure to comply could lead to a “substantial claim for damages” in both U.S. and UK courts.

A spokesperson for the BBC said the broadcaster “stands by its reporting” and follows “strict editorial guidelines to ensure accuracy and impartiality.” The spokesperson added that the corporation “does not comment on legal correspondence.”

This is not the first time Trump has clashed with international media outlets. Throughout his presidency and beyond, he has frequently accused major networks — including CNN, NBC, and the BBC — of bias and spreading “fake news.”

Legal experts note that while cross-border defamation claims can be complex, Trump’s move appears designed to exert public pressure rather than immediately initiate proceedings. “It’s likely a warning shot,” said Professor Emily Turner, a media law specialist at King’s College London. “However, the BBC has a strong record of defending its journalism in court.”

The threat of legal action comes as Trump faces mounting scrutiny over his campaign finances and ongoing criminal cases in the U.S. Despite these challenges, he continues to lead polls among Republican voters and remains defiant toward what he calls the “global media establishment.”

As of now, the BBC has not indicated whether it plans to issue a correction or respond further. Trump’s camp, meanwhile, has vowed to “hold media organisations accountable for spreading falsehoods.”

If confirmed, this would mark one of the most high-profile legal threats by a former U.S. president against a foreign broadcaster in modern history.

Attached is a news article regarding trump writing a letter to the BBC with legal threats 

https://www.rte.ie/news/uk/2025/1110/1543092-bbc-resignations/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  UK Schools Could Receive Expanded Free School Meals if Taxes Are Increased, Government Sugge...