Sunday, 16 November 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Corruption Within UK Prisons: A Growing Threat to Safety and Public Trust

Corruption within UK prisons has become an increasingly serious concern, raising questions about security, staff integrity, and the influence of organised crime behind bars. In recent years, official reports, court cases, and internal investigations have exposed how a small number of corrupt prison officers have undermined the system from within—smuggling contraband, leaking sensitive information, and forming inappropriate relationships with inmates.

A System Under Pressure

The UK prison service operates in a challenging environment marked by overcrowdingstaff shortages, and rising levels of violence. These conditions create vulnerabilities that criminal networks inside prisons are quick to exploit. Officers—especially newer recruits—are often targeted by inmates who offer money, gifts, or emotional manipulation in exchange for favours.


According to prison inspectors and justice officials, corruption generally falls into three main categories:

Smuggling contraband, such as drugs, weapons, SIM cards, and tobacco

Improper relationships with inmates, sometimes involving coercion or blackmail

Leaking confidential information, including security details or the movement of high-risk prisoners

Even a single corrupt member of staff can significantly damage institutional safety and internal discipline.

High-Profile Cases Spark Concern

Several recent prosecutions have highlighted the scale of the problem. In multiple UK prisons, officers have been jailed for smuggling cocaine, cannabis, and mobile phones to inmates in exchange for cash payments that, in some cases, reached thousands of pounds. Other cases have exposed officers entering relationships with inmates, compromising their professional responsibilities and, in some instances, enabling gang operations from within the prison walls.

Investigators say criminal gangs often deliberately target staff, identifying those who appear vulnerable, isolated, or unhappy in their job. Once compromised, officers can be pressured into further illegal activity, trapping them in a cycle of criminal behaviour.

Impact on Prison Safety

Corruption does not only enable prisoners to break the rules—it directly fuels violence and criminal enterprise. Mobile phones allow inmates to coordinate attacks, run drug operations, and intimidate witnesses outside prison. Smuggling drugs contributes to addiction, debt, and conflict between inmates, while weapons increase the risk of serious assaults.

These illicit activities also undermine public trust in the justice system. When the people responsible for maintaining order become complicit in wrongdoing, it raises doubts about the integrity of the entire prison service.

Government Response and Anti-Corruption Measures

The Ministry of Justice has taken steps to address the issue. Measures introduced in recent years include:

Enhanced vetting of staff

Body scanners to detect smuggled items entering prisons

Stronger intelligence teams working with police to track criminal networks

Increased CCTV and monitoring of staff behaviour

Anti-corruption training for new recruits

The creation of the Prison Anti-Corruption Unit (PACU) has also strengthened investigative capabilities. The unit works nationally to identify rogue officers and prosecute them where necessary.

A Minority, but a Serious Problem

Officials stress that the vast majority of prison officers are hardworking, dedicated professionals who face difficult and sometimes dangerous conditions. However, even a small minority of corrupt individuals can create widespread harm.

Experts argue that to effectively reduce corruption, prisons must not only enforce stricter security but also address the root causes—poor working conditions, inadequate pay, and a lack of support for staff exposed to high levels of stress.

Conclusion

Corruption among prison officers in the UK poses a significant risk to safety, rehabilitation, and public confidence. While the number of corrupt staff remains small, the consequences of their actions are serious, often extending beyond prison walls. Continued investment in security, training, and staff welfare will be vital to preventing criminal networks from exploiting weaknesses within the system.

Attached is a news article regarding prison officer corruption 

https://www.rocu.police.uk/news/2025/corrupt-prison-officer-jailed-for-relationship-with-inmate-and-smuggling-contraband/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

U.S. Technology Turns Air Into Drinking Water: A Breakthrough in Clean Water Innovation

A groundbreaking new wave of American technology is transforming one of the world’s most abundant resources—air—into clean, safe drinking water. As global demand for freshwater continues to rise amid climate change and population growth, these atmospheric water generation (AWG) systems are emerging as one of the most promising solutions to future water scarcity.

How the Technology Works

Atmospheric Water Generators operate by pulling in humid air, cooling it to the point where water vapour condenses, and then filtering and purifying the liquid to produce clean drinking water. The systems often use advanced filtration stages, UV sterilisation, and mineralisation to ensure the final output is safe, fresh, and great-tasting.



Some U.S. companies have taken this innovation even further by developing solar-powered AWG units, capable of producing water in remote areas without relying on electricity grids. This opens the door to humanitarian uses, disaster relief operations, and rural deployment where traditional water infrastructure is limited or unreliable.

A Lifeline for Water-Stressed Communities

The United States, despite its wealth and development, faces increasing water challenges. States like California, Arizona, and New Mexico have seen rivers dry up, reservoirs fall to record lows, and groundwater levels plummet. AWG technology is being tested in several of these regions to supplement strained municipal supplies.

Emergency response agencies have also expressed interest. In disaster zones—whether hit by hurricanes, wildfires, or contaminated water systems—these machines can provide instant access to clean drinking water without the need to transport heavy bottled supplies.

From Military Use to Civilian Homes

Originally researched for U.S. military operations, especially in desert environments, AWG systems are now making their way into civilian markets. New household-scale generators can produce several litres of drinking water per day, making them attractive to off-grid homeowners, campers, and individuals seeking greater control over their water quality.

Larger commercial units, capable of producing hundreds or even thousands of litres daily, are being tested by businesses, schools, and local governments.

Environmental Benefits

One of the most significant advantages of atmospheric water technology is its potential to reduce plastic waste. By eliminating the need for bottled water in many situations, AWGs contribute to lowering pollution and reducing emissions tied to bottling and transportation.

Additionally, because some models use renewable energy, the overall environmental footprint is far smaller than that of traditional desalination plants, which consume large amounts of electricity.

Challenges Ahead

Despite its promise, the technology is not without obstacles:

Energy Consumption: Larger, industrial units require significant power, though improvements in efficiency are rapidly reducing energy demands.

Climate Dependency: Performance varies depending on humidity levels, meaning the technology works best in moderate to tropical climates.

Initial Cost: High upfront prices remain a barrier, though increased adoption is expected to lower costs over time.


A Glimpse Into the Future of Water

Experts believe atmospheric water generation could play an essential role in the future of global water security. As the United States continues investing in sustainable infrastructure and climate-resilient technologies, AWGs are positioned to become a mainstream tool in the battle against water scarcity.

For communities seeking independence from ageing water systems, for emergency responders on the front lines, and for countries around the world facing severe drought, the idea of turning air into drinking water may no longer be science fiction—it may be the beginning of a new era in water innovation.

Attached is a news article regarding US technology that coverts aro in to drinking water 

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/us-army-to-test-air-to-drinking-water-tech

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Orders Probe into Epstein-Clinton Ties: A New Twist in the Epstein Saga

Washington, D.C — Former U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly called for a formal investigation into the ties between Jeffrey Epstein — the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender — and prominent Democratic figures, most notably former President Bill Clinton.

What Trump Is Asking For

On 14 November 2025, Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, demanding that Attorney General Pam Bondi, together with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI, examine Epstein’s connections not just with Clinton, but with other major names such as Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, and financial institutions like J.P. Morgan Chase.  

Trump wrote that he wants to “determine what was going on with them, and him.”  

He framed the move as part of a broader political battle, calling the Epstein controversy a “hoax … with all arrows pointing to the Democrats.”   He even accused Democrats of using Epstein’s case to distract from other issues, such as a recent government shutdown.  

DOJ Response: Bondi Acts

In response to Trump’s demand, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that she has assigned Jay ClaytonU.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, to lead the investigation.   Bondi described Clayton as “one of the most capable and trusted prosecutors in the country.”  

What’s Driving Trump’s Call

Analysts suggest several possible motives behind Trump’s push:

1. Political Deflection

By calling for a probe into Democrats’ Epstein ties, Trump may be trying to shift focus away from his own historical connections to Epstein.  

He explicitly refers to Epstein as a “Democrat’s problem.”  

2. Leveraging Newly Released Documents

The timing coincides with the release of tens of thousands of pages of Epstein-related emails by the U.S. House Oversight Committee.  

Some of those documents reference Trump himself — raising questions about his own involvement or knowledge.  

3. Undermining Institutional Independence

Trump’s call for the DOJ and FBI to take up the probe underscores a broader debate about political influence over traditionally independent institutions.  

Critics argue that giving such a high-profile investigation to a prosecutor selected by Bondi — a political ally — could erode the impartiality of the justice system.  

Opposition and Pushback

Bill Clinton’s Response

Clinton has denied any wrongdoing. His deputy chief of staff, Angel Ureña, said the recently published emails “prove Bill Clinton did nothing and knew nothing.”  

Clinton has also rejected allegations of visiting Epstein’s Caribbean island, despite Trump’s claims.  

Third-Party Reactions

J.P. Morgan Chase, one of the institutions named by Trump, expressed regret for past associations with Epstein but denied any involvement in his criminal acts.  

Larry Summers has admitted regret over his relationship with Epstein, calling it “a major error of judgement.”  

Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn and a prominent Democratic donor, also expressed remorse for his interactions with Epstein.  

Legal and Political Implications

Separation of Powers

Trump’s demand raises serious questions around the balance of power: can a former (or potentially current) president direct law enforcement to investigate political rivals in this way?  

The rapid assignment of a high-profile prosecutor could be seen by some as politicisation of the justice system.

Epstein Files Transparency Act

At the same time, U.S. lawmakers have pushed for greater transparency via the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which seeks to force the DOJ to release all Epstein-related documents.  

Trump’s strategy could complicate such efforts — if a probe is declared “ongoing,” certain documents may remain sealed on legal grounds.

Public Perception

For Trump supporters, this may reinforce a narrative of his fighting back against a “deep state” or entrenched Democratic elites.

For critics, it may appear as an opportunistic diversion — using the Epstein scandal to score political points.

Risks & Challenges

1. Burden of Proof

So far, none of the individuals Trump named (Clinton, Summers, Hoffman) have been accused by Epstein’s victims of sexual misconduct.  

Without clear evidence of criminal wrongdoing, a full criminal investigation may struggle to gain traction.

2. Credibility Risk

Trump’s historically close relationship with Epstein undermines the spectacle of him now calling for investigations.  

Observers may view this as hypocritical — trying to deflect attention rather than genuinely seeking justice.

3. Institutional Backlash

Legal experts may question whether Bondi’s quick compliance erodes the independence of the DOJ.

Congressional Democrats — and others — may resist or scrutinise the investigation, especially if it appears politically motivated.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s recent call for a DOJ and FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with Bill Clinton and other high-profile Democrats is a bold political gambit. By repositioning himself as a crusader for “truth” on Epstein, he is attempting to recast the narrative — from being under scrutiny himself, to leading a probe into his political rivals.

But whether this will lead to meaningful legal consequences, or simply deepen the political theatre around Epstein’s legacy, remains unclear. The balance between genuine accountability and partisan manoeuvring may prove delicate — and consequential.

Attached is a news article regarding Trump opening a investigation on the Epstein and bill Clinton files 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-will-ask-justice-department-probe-epstein-ties-with-bill-clinton-2025-11-14/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 Mews viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Buffett’s Big Tech Bet: A $4 Billion Stake in Google

In a surprising move, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has taken a major position in Alphabet, the parent company of Google. According to regulatory filings, Berkshire now owns around 17.8 million Alphabet shares, valued at roughly $4.3 billion as of September 30, 2025.  

Some reports even put the value closer to $4.9 billion, depending on share prices at quarter-end.  

Why This Is Notable

1. A Shift for Buffett

Buffett is not usually associated with big tech. His traditional investing style is rooted in value investing — favouring companies with predictable cash flows, strong moats, and business models he deeply understands (like insurance, consumer goods, finance).  

This makes a large bet on Alphabet particularly significant. While Berkshire has had tech exposure (e.g., Apple), Google represents a different kind of tech business — more scalable, more exposed to the cloud, advertising, and AI.  

2. Regret and Opportunity

It’s not the first time Buffett has publicly regretted passing on Google. In earlier comments, he noted that Google’s advertising business offered “fantastic margins,” especially when GEICO (Berkshire’s insurance arm) was paying Google per click.  

Now, Berkshire is acting on that regret — putting skin in the game when it sees long-term value.

3. Strategic Timing

Berkshire has been stockpiling cash. At the end of the quarter, its cash reserves were at record levels.  

Meanwhile, the tech landscape is changing fast. Alphabet is deeply engaged in AI, cloud infrastructure, and other high-growth areas. Buffett (or his investment team) may believe Google is well-positioned for the next decade.  

The investment comes just as Buffett is nearing the end of his 60-year run as CEO of Berkshire.   Some analysts see it as a baton-passing moment — perhaps signaling the direction Berkshire’s next generation of leadership (like Greg Abel) might lean toward.

4. Rebalancing Away from Apple

Alongside the Alphabet purchase, Berkshire is reducing its Apple holdings. In the same quarter, it cut its Apple stake to 238.2 million shares, down from 280 million.  

This suggests a deliberate rebalancing: moving some capital from a mature consumer-tech behemoth into a more diversified, scalable tech play.

Risks and Considerations

Tech Volatility: Alphabet is exposed to macro risks, regulatory pressure, and the cyclicality of ad spending.

AI Competition: While Google is a major AI player, it competes with other big tech firms. Returns depend on continued innovation.

Valuation Risk: Betting big means the entry price matters. If Alphabet’s growth slows, the investment could be pressured.

Who’s Steering: It’s not 100% clear whether Buffett personally made this call, or whether long-time lieutenants (Todd Combs, Ted Weschler) or even his successor had a bigger role.  

Why It Matters to Investors

Confidence Signal: For many investors, a Buffett-led move still carries weight. A multi-billion-dollar purchase can be seen as a strong vote of confidence in Alphabet.

Portfolio Diversification: This adds a heavyweight tech name to Berkshire’s top holdings — boosting growth exposure.

Long-Term Play: This isn’t likely a short-term trade. It aligns with Buffett-style, long-horizon investment, betting on Google’s future in cloud, AI, and core advertising.

Final Thoughts

Warren Buffett’s ~$4 billion-plus investment into Google’s parent company isn’t just another tech bet — it’s a meaningful pivot. It reflects both a recognition of Alphabet’s long-term potential and perhaps a change in how Berkshire’s new-generation leadership views technology.

For Buffett, it could be both redemption (for missing Google earlier) and a forward-looking bet on AI and scalable platforms. For the wider investment world, it’s a powerful endorsement — and a reminder that even the most value-oriented investors are not immune to the lure of transformational tech.

Attached is a news article regarding warren buffet investing 4 billion in goggle 

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/berkshire-buys-shares-google-parent-alphabet-sells-more-apple-2025-11-14/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36


















Saturday, 15 November 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Google’s AI-Powered Cockroaches: Inside the Alleged Next Frontier of Micro Spy Technology

Rumours circulating through the tech world have sparked a wave of fascination — and concern — over claims that Google is experimenting with AI-powered robotic cockroaches designed for micro-level surveillance. While the company has not confirmed any such programme, the idea has ignited debate about how far modern technology could push the boundaries of privacy, intelligence gathering, and bio-robotics.

A Marriage Between Robotics and Biology

The concept behind AI-enabled robotic insects is not entirely new. For years, research labs have explored the idea of merging micro-robotics with insect biology to create devices capable of navigating environments too small or dangerous for humans or drones.

The alleged Google prototypes — nicknamed “G-Roaches” by insiders — are said to be:

The size of real cockroaches, allowing them to blend seamlessly into most indoor environments.

Fitted with micro cameras, miniature storage chips, and ultra-low-power sensors.

Controlled by a neural AI module mimicking insect movement patterns to avoid detection.

Powered by an energy-harvesting exoskeleton, enabling long-term operation without charging.

If such machines exist, they could slip through cracks, cling to ceilings, and manoeuvre through ventilation systems while transmitting encrypted data to remote receivers.

Purpose: Security, Surveillance, or Something Else

Reports suggest the project began as a collaboration between Google’s AI division and its experimental robotics department. The aim was allegedly to develop micro-scouts capable of:

Inspecting disaster zones where traditional drones cannot fly

Detecting hazardous chemicals or radiation

Conducting infrastructure inspections in tight spaces

Assisting law enforcement or intelligence agencies in high-risk operations

However, it is the surveillance implications that have captured public imagination — and concern. With devices small enough to go unnoticed and AI smart enough to move like living insects, critics argue such technology could be misused by governments or private corporations.

Ethical Questions and Public Backlash

Privacy advocates warn that AI-driven micro-surveillance would represent one of the greatest threats to civil liberties in modern history.

Some of the key concerns include:

Invisibility: A robotic insect cannot be spotted by the average person.

Access: Homes, offices, and even secure facilities could be infiltrated without physical force.

Accountability: If deployed covertly, oversight would be nearly impossible.

Digital-rights groups have urged regulators to establish strict bans or limits on “micro-surveillance robotics” before tech companies — or governments — push the boundaries further.

Google’s Response

While Google has denied involvement in any malicious surveillance programme, the company has not explicitly confirmed or denied work on micro-robotics. A spokesperson simply stated that “Google does not engage in clandestine surveillance activities and any robotics research is strictly regulated and transparent.”

Still, the lack of clear detail has only fuelled speculation.

The Future of Micro-Robots

Whether or not Google is truly building AI-powered cockroach spies, one thing is certain: micro-robotic technologies are advancing rapidly. Governments, militaries, and private companies worldwide are investing in ultra-small devices capable of gathering information in places humans cannot reach.

If such AI-insect hybrids become a reality, society may soon face questions about how much surveillance is too much — and who should be allowed to wield such powerful tools.

Attached is a news article regarding Germany using AI powered cockroaches for Spy operations 

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/spy-cockroaches-ai-robots-germany-plots-future-warfare-2025-07-23/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

















Friday, 14 November 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

TikTok Influencer HSTikkyTokky Given 12-Month Suspended Sentence After Supercar Crash and Court No-Show

Harrison Sullivan, known online as HSTikkyTokky, has been handed a 12-month suspended custodial sentence following a dramatic court case involving a high-speed supercar crash and a subsequent year-long absence from the UK justice system.

Crash and Charges

In March 2024, Sullivan crashed his McLaren supercar in Virginia Water, Surrey, while reportedly travelling at 71 mph in a 40 mph zone. Witnesses described the vehicle as going “extremely fast,” with some estimating speeds of “at least 100mph or more.”  

He later pleaded guilty to dangerous driving and driving without insurance.  

Fleeing the Country

Shortly after the crash, Sullivan did not show up in court. Instead, he spent around 12 months travelling abroad, moving between Dubai, Thailand, and Spain — all while continuing to post on social media.  

A warrant was eventually issued for his arrest. He was detained in Spain in August 2025 (on what the court called “unrelated matters”), before being brought back to the UK on a chartered flight.  The prosecution has since applied for £18,049.47 to be paid to Surrey Police for the cost of the flight.  


Court Appearance and Sentencing

When Sullivan finally appeared at Staines Magistrates’ Court, he was wearing a grey prison tracksuit.   He was given the one-year suspended sentence, meaning he will avoid immediate prison provided he meets certain conditions.

Alongside the suspended sentence, additional penalties were imposed:

Driving ban: 2 years  

Electronic tag: 3 months  

Unpaid work: 300 hours  

Rehabilitation: 30 days mandated  

Extended driving test after the ban  

Judge’s Remarks and Public Impact

The judge described Sullivan’s actions as a “deliberate decision to ignore the rules of the road.”  However, she notably refused to increase the sentence purely to “set an example” to his large social media following.  

In a letter to the court, Sullivan expressed remorse, writing that he was “ashamed” of what happened. He also acknowledged his influence, stating that he understood how dangerous behaviour could be replicated by young followers: “If I am acting in a dangerous way, this could influence others to do the same.”  

Reaction and Broader Implications

The case has triggered strong reactions.

Critics argue the sentence is too lenient, especially for a public figure who appeared to evade the law.

Supporters suggest the court recognised his genuine remorse and gave him a chance to redeem himself without immediate imprisonment.

Road safety campaigners see this as a cautionary tale on the risks of glamorising supercars and high-speed driving on social media.

Some also question whether influencers like Sullivan should be held to higher standards, given their large, impressionable audience.

Next Steps

A costs hearing is due on 15 January at Staines Magistrates’ Court, where prosecutors will argue for Sullivan to pay back the cost of the chartered return flight.  

Meanwhile, Sullivan must comply with his sentence conditions over the next two years (the suspension period), or risk his sentence being activated.

Attached is a news article regarding  Influencer HSTikkyTokky Given 12-Month Suspended Sentence

https://news.sky.com/story/hstikkytokky-avoids-jail-after-crashing-mclaren-supercar-and-court-no-show-13470241

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

BBC Issues Apology to Donald Trump – But the Former President Says Legal Action Will Continue

The BBC has formally apologised to former U.S. President Donald Trump following a recent broadcast that his team claimed contained “inaccurate and damaging statements.” However, despite the corporation’s acknowledgement and apology, Trump has made it clear that he still intends to pursue legal action.

The Apology

In a statement released this week, the BBC said it “regrets any misunderstanding caused” by remarks aired during a political analysis segment. The broadcaster clarified that the commentary “did not reflect the full context” of Trump’s position on the matter discussed.

The corporation stressed that the error was unintentional and that corrective steps had been taken, including a clarification on its website and a brief on-air note acknowledging the issue.

Trump’s Reaction

Donald Trump welcomed the apology but insisted it did not go far enough. In a message posted through his team, he said:

“While I appreciate the BBC’s apology, the damage has already been done. We will continue pursuing all legal avenues to hold them fully accountable.”

Trump has long been outspoken about media coverage, frequently accusing major broadcasters of misrepresenting him. His team argue that the BBC’s comments led to “significant reputational harm,” prompting the decision not to withdraw upcoming legal action.

Legal Action Still on the Table

According to sources close to the former president, lawyers have prepared filings that could be submitted in both the UK and the United States. The case reportedly centres on claims of defamation and the broader issue of inaccurate political reporting.

Legal analysts note that such cases can be challenging, particularly in the U.S., where public figures face a higher legal threshold to prove defamation. However, Trump’s team insists that the statements broadcast by the BBC were “knowingly misleading.”

BBC Responds to Legal Threat

A spokesperson for the BBC stated that the corporation would “vigorously defend its journalism where necessary,” but also emphasised that it remains committed to accuracy and transparency.

“We take complaints extremely seriously,” the spokesperson said. “Our apology reflects our standards of accountability, but we stand by our commitment to fair and robust reporting.”

What Happens Next

The situation now appears set to escalate. Lawyers representing Trump are currently reviewing the BBC’s apology and determining next steps. Meanwhile, the broadcaster maintains that the matter should be considered resolved.

With Trump gearing up for continued legal battles on multiple fronts, this clash with the BBC marks the latest chapter in his ongoing feud with major media organisations.

Attached is a news article regarding trump taking legal action on BBC despite legal action 

https://news.sky.com/story/donald-trump-confirms-he-will-sue-the-bbc-over-panorama-edit-despite-apology-13470587

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Story of Lisa Phillips: Surviving Grooming and Abuse by Jeffrey Epstein

Lisa Phillips is among the women who have courageously spoken out about their abuse by Jeffrey Epstein — not just as a predator, but as someone who styled himself as a mentor. Her journey sheds light on how power, manipulation, and grooming operate in elite circles.

Early Life and Modeling Ambitions

Phillips’ modeling career began as a teenager: by 16, she was working in fashion hubs such as London and Paris.  

At around 21, she moved to New York, hoping to make her big break by signing with a major agency.  

Meeting Epstein on Little Saint James

On a shoot in the British West Indies, Phillips was introduced to Epstein via another model.  

One night, she was told Epstein wanted a massage. Phillips recalls how she felt uneasy: she didn’t really understand what was going to happen.  

She later says the “massage” turned into a sexual assault when Epstein was naked on a massage table.  

Afterward, she says she felt trapped, isolated, and very confused: she was on an island, far from home, and unable to simply “leave.”  

Manipulation, Grooming & Mentorship

Epstein kept reaching out via his assistants, trying to pull her back into his orbit.  

He told her he could help her career. And he did: she later signed with a modeling agency, in part due to his influence.  

Over time, Phillips says Epstein became more than an abuser — a “mentor.” She regularly visited his Manhattan mansion, where abuse would happen, but he also appeared to counsel her, support her ambitions, and introduce her to powerful people.  

She describes a deeply confusing relationship: the person who abused her was also someone who made her feel seen, important, and nurtured.  


Long-Term Impact & Healing

After her experiences with Epstein, Phillips’ life “spiralled”: she struggled with shame, began drinking and taking drugs.  

It was only years later — after Epstein’s death in 2019 — that she began to make sense of what had happened, connecting with other survivors and realizing that her story shared many painful commonalities with theirs.  

She now hosts a podcast called “From Now On”, using her platform to educate others about grooming, abuse and trafficking.  

Public Advocacy & Accountability

Phillips has become vocal not just about her own abuse, but about the broader Epstein network.  

In 2025, she announced that a group of Epstein survivors are compiling their own “list” of people associated with Epstein — “by survivors and for survivors” — because they believe powerful individuals in Epstein’s orbit remain unaccountable.  

She has also criticized political figures who she feels are dismissing survivors’ demands, for example calling out Donald Trump for referring to Epstein files as a “Democrat hoax.”  

The Complexity of Abuse

One of the most striking aspects of Phillips’ story is the emotional complexity she describes: she both resented Epstein and felt a strange loyalty or gratitude toward him, because of the “good” he appeared to do.  

This duality is not unusual in abuse survivors: grooming often creates bonds, confusion, and dependency that can last years.

Phillips now speaks openly about the importance of awareness: recognizing grooming behaviours, being aware of red flags, and challenging the idea that abuse always looks like a simple, violent attack.  

Why Her Story Matters

Breaking the silence: By coming forward, Phillips helps highlight that Epstein’s network harmed not just underage girls, but also young adults — and that grooming and manipulation can happen in “elite” settings.

Empowerment: Her podcast and advocacy work provide a space for other survivors to be heard and to heal.

Accountability push: Her work with other survivors to compile a “survivor-led list” of Epstein’s associates speaks to a broader demand for transparency and justice.

Prevention: By discussing her experience in public, Phillips is helping educate people about grooming, the subtlety of manipulation, and the red flags that can often be overlooked.

Lisa Phillips’s story is a powerful reminder that abuse is rarely simple — it’s often wrapped in trust, in mentorship, in the promise of opportunity. Her bravery in speaking out helps give voice to the many who are still fighting to be believed, understood, and heard.

Attached is a news article regarding Lisa Phillips being abused by Jeffrey Epstein 

https://www.itv.com/thismorning/articles/i-was-abused-by-epstein-he-asked-me-if-i-wanted-to-meet-a-prince

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36



















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

President Ibrahim Traore’s, 

Jamaica does not need a warning, as you have no right to say that we are bowing to other nation’s of the world, as we have already been at the depts of destruction that affect the people of Jamaica, nature is a cause of the downfall that can affect other’s around the world too. 

The past is a continuing mind set’ that bring’s a negative down fall to our nation, if we continue to see that people of other culture, bring pain to people of the past’ then we will still have that mind set years to come. 

The mind now” to then mind then is completely different, president ibrahim traore, you need to wake up and stop looking at other nation’s that does not concern how the development of your nation of people might grow, you need to focus on your self and Jamaica can focus on them self, on how they would develop. 

Teach your people skill’s and knowledge, as that’s the way you can change your people’s life, it’s no different from a polish man or a English man, as the comparison between a Jamaican man and a bikini Faso man,  states facts that we are of two different nations and two different individuals. 

President Ibrahim, you should concern yourself with your own  nation, as Jamaica know it position in this world, as we are small nation that is all ways attacked on our identity, there are African Jamaicans like there is English Africans, African Americans, It’s a mixed world we live in, as the way forward is to learn and stop repeating your self, because no one cares in this world, as its every man for him self in realty. 

Jamaica is awake, as we don’t need to beg for your voice or support, as we hold our own people at heart, Africa need’s to stop killing then self before they claim that other nations are killing your people. 

Speaking in your English accent in a professional manner, then  insulting the language of Jamaican people, as you need to wake up and understand how you are talking your self, patios is a different comparison from English, as you are speaking English not patios. 

The English language was invented by Germans and that then changed to English, as patios is a language that was invented by Jamaican people, but has a similar comparison to English. 

The world need to understand that Jamaica is a small country, as people hold so much weight over its head, as it’s all based on charisma, that bring’s people to hold jealous actions of negative energy towards Jamaican people. 

Jamaica don’t need to fight or hold war or bring destruction with other nations around the world, it’s a very small country and we are happy on how we need to grow, happy with our people who are Jamaican people at heart.  As we are a poor nation that strives of natural surroundings. Peace and harmony! 

President Ibrahim Traore, you need to concern yourself with you own nations and develop and bond with a world that can bring change, look for innovation and creativity, as learning is the best way to bring a better nation forward. 

Africa is a big nation that hold’s a lot of different cultures, as its split on to different continents, be organised is a first step for your future, Jamaican are at the foot hold of nature causing destruction. As Jamaica don’t need negativity from other leaders. 

Jamaican people are happy, as we don’t need negative actions of a voice that don’t make sense to how a future can benefit Jamaican people. 

Don’t sell your gold and other materials to other parts of the world, use it to build your own infrastructure, it’s that simple, the past is a daunting time, but today is a daunting time, as people of black culture in Africa are killing each other all the time, it’s a sick mind that leads to these killing’s in Africa. 

Jamaican people try to not kill, as we have gang violence’ as we hold our self important to the people of the world, as a whole to the people of Jamaica. 

Stop knocking on our door. Stop bullying’ because you are a bigger nation. 

Attached is a News article regarding President Traore 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1egely9v3go.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Rising Concerns Over Online Porn Exposure Among Young People Children and teenagers are bein...