Wednesday, 17 December 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Imran Khan’s Prison Cell Conditions and the Consequences of His Incarceration

Imran Khan, Pakistan’s former prime minister and one of the country’s most polarising political figures, has been held in prison since 2023 following a series of court rulings against him. His detention has triggered intense debate at home and abroad—over the conditions of his confinement, the legal basis for his imprisonment, and the wider impact on Pakistan’s fragile political landscape.

Inside Imran Khan’s Prison Cell

Imran Khan is incarcerated at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi, a high-security facility that houses many high-profile detainees. According to statements from his legal team and party officials, his cell is modest and tightly controlled. They describe limited space, basic bedding, and restricted access to personal items. Security measures are stringent, with surveillance and controlled movement reflecting his status as a former head of government.

Authorities maintain that he receives treatment consistent with prison regulations, including access to medical care, reading materials such as religious texts, and limited outdoor time. However, Khan’s supporters argue that restrictions on visits, communication, and access to legal counsel amount to punitive conditions designed to isolate him politically.

Why Imran Khan Is in Jail

Imran Khan’s imprisonment stems from multiple legal cases that unfolded after his removal from office in April 2022. The most significant include:

Corruption convictions linked to the sale and retention of state gifts (the Toshakhana case), in which courts ruled he improperly benefited from items received during his premiership.

Charges under Pakistan’s Official Secrets Act, relating to the handling of a confidential diplomatic cable—often referred to as the “cipher case.”

Additional cases involving allegations of misuse of authority and contempt of court.

Khan and his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party deny wrongdoing, insisting the cases are politically motivated and aimed at preventing his return to power. Pakistan’s government and judiciary, however, argue that the convictions followed due legal process.

Political and Personal Consequences

The consequences of Imran Khan’s imprisonment have been far-reaching:

Political impact: His detention has weakened PTI’s ability to campaign freely, reshaping Pakistan’s electoral landscape and intensifying claims of political suppression.

Public unrest: Protests and clashes between supporters and security forces have erupted periodically, highlighting deep divisions within society.

Personal toll: Khan’s lawyers have raised concerns about his health and wellbeing, citing stress, isolation, and the strain of prolonged incarceration.

International Reaction

Human rights groups and international observers have expressed concern about the fairness of proceedings and the conditions under which Khan is held. Some foreign governments have urged Pakistan to uphold democratic norms and judicial independence, while Islamabad insists the cases are strictly legal, not political.

A Symbol Beyond the Cell

Whether viewed as accountability or persecution, Imran Khan’s prison cell has become a symbol of Pakistan’s broader struggle between civilian politics, the judiciary, and powerful state institutions. As appeals continue and political tensions remain high, his detention is likely to shape Pakistan’s future long after the prison doors eventually open.

Attached is a news article regarding imran khan prison conditions 

https://news.sky.com/story/imran-khans-sons-fear-they-may-never-see-him-again-as-former-pakistan-pm-held-in-death-cell-13484410

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Kieran Hayler Denies Rape and Sexual Assault Charges Involving 13-Year-Old Girl

Kieran Hayler, the 38-year-old former husband of TV personality Katie Price, has formally denied charges that he raped and sexually assaulted a 13-year-old girl. 

Hayler appeared at Lewes Crown Court in East Sussex on Wednesday, where he entered not guilty pleas to three counts of rape and one count of sexual assault.  The alleged offences are said to have taken place at an address in West Sussex in 2016, when the girl was 13 and Hayler was married to Katie Price.  

At the court hearing, Hayler was dressed in a navy coat and grey tie, and confirmed his identity before entering his pleas.  He is currently out on bail, with conditions including that he does not contact the alleged victim.  

Upcoming Trial and Court Dates

A trial has been set for October 6, 2026, where the case will be heard over an estimated one-week period.  Before that, Hayler is due back in court for a pre-trial review on April 23 next year.  

His Denial and Legal Position

Hayler’s legal team has issued a statement saying he “strongly denies the allegations made against him in their entirety.”  They added that he is fully cooperating with the police investigation and believes his name will be cleared through the judicial process.  

Under UK law, individuals charged with criminal offences are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court. The trial will examine all evidence before any verdict is reached.

Background

Hayler became known publicly through his past relationship with television personality Katie Price, whom he married in 2013. The couple later divorced in 2021 after separating in 2018.  They share children together, and their high-profile relationship has frequently attracted media attention.  

The identity of the alleged victim is protected by law due to her age, and Sussex Police have confirmed she has been offered support from specially trained officers as enquiries continue.  

Attached is a News article regarding Kieran hayler pleads not guilty to raping a 13 year old girl 

https://www.northwaleschronicle.co.uk/news/national/25704913.katie-prices-ex-husband-denies-rape-charges/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tragic Death of Macclesfield FC Forward Ethan McLeod in Car Crash

Football in England has been struck by a devastating loss with the death of 21-year-old forward Ethan McLeod, who was killed in a car accident while returning from a match on Tuesday night. 

McLeod, who had recently signed for Macclesfield FC, died after his vehicle collided with a metal barrier on the M1 motorway near Junction 15, Northamptonshire, late on the evening of 16 December 2025. Emergency services and members of the public attended the scene, but he was pronounced dead at the roadside.  

A Promising Career Cut Short

A product of the Wolverhampton Wanderers academy, where he joined at just seven years old, McLeod was regarded as a talented and hard-working forward. After spending a decade at Wolves, he played for non-league sides including AlvechurchRushall Olympic and Stourbridge before joining Macclesfield in July 2025.  

During his time with Macclesfield, he made several appearances and scored goals that drew admiration from teammates, coaches and supporters alike. His infectious personality, professionalism, and dedication made him a respected figure in the dressing room.  

Club and Community Reaction

Macclesfield FC issued a heartfelt tribute, describing McLeod as “an incredibly talented and well-respected member of our first-team squad who had his whole life ahead of him.” The club’s statement reflected the profound sadness felt throughout the organisation, saying his “unique smile that mesmerised us all will never be forgotten”.  

The Wolves, where McLeod began his football journey, said they were “heartbroken” at the tragic news and announced that a minute’s silence would be held at their upcoming Premier League fixture in his honour.  

Tributes have also poured in from former clubs, teammates, and supporters across English football, recognising not only his ability on the pitch but the positive impact he had on those around him.  

Remembering Ethan McLeod

The tragic death of Ethan McLeod has left a deep void in the hearts of the Macclesfield community and the wider football family. At just 21, his rising career was brutally cut short, and the loss resonates far beyond the clubs he represented.

As investigations into the crash continue, friends, family, teammates and fans are coming together to mourn and celebrate a young life and career full of potential — a reminder of the fragile and precious nature of life itself.  

Attached is a News article regarding Macclesfield football Players dies in car crash 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Viral Claim About Adele’s Drinking Sparks Health Debate — But Where’s the Proof?

Recent online chatter has circulated a dramatic claim that Adele once drank 25 bottles of wine in a single night and remained “sober,” with some posts going further by suggesting this proves alcoholism and inevitable long-term health damage. The story is attention-grabbing — but it collapses under basic scrutiny.

An Extraordinary Claim Without Evidence

There is no verified interview, medical record, or credible reporting to support the idea that Adele consumed anything close to 25 bottles of wine in one night. To put the number in context, that amount would equate to dozens of standard drinks — a level that would almost certainly cause acute alcohol poisoning, medical emergency, or death for nearly anyone. Claims that someone could do this and remain “sober” contradict established medical science.

In short: the claim lacks evidence and plausibility.

Why “Staying Sober” After Extreme Drinking Is a Myth

Alcohol affects the central nervous system in predictable ways. Even people with high tolerance cannot bypass alcohol’s physiological impact. At extreme levels, alcohol depresses breathing, disrupts heart rhythm, and overwhelms the liver’s ability to metabolize toxins. The notion of drinking enormous quantities without impairment is often a misunderstanding of tolerance — or pure exaggeration.

Alcoholism: A Medical Diagnosis, Not a Headline

Labeling someone an “alcoholic” based on a rumor is misleading and harmful. Alcohol use disorder is a clinical diagnosis that depends on patterns over time, loss of control, dependence, and negative consequences — not viral anecdotes. Publicly available interviews show Adele has spoken candidly in the past about lifestyle changes, including periods of drinking less or abstaining, which directly undermines claims of unchecked dependency.

Real Health Risks — Explained Responsibly

While the story itself appears unfounded, it does open the door to a legitimate discussion about alcohol’s health risks when consumption is excessive:

Liver disease (fatty liverhepatitiscirrhosis)

Cardiovascular problems, including high blood pressure and stroke

Cognitive impairment and increased anxiety or depression

Higher cancer risk, particularly breast and digestive cancers

These outcomes are tied to sustained heavy drinking, not a single sensationalized night — and certainly not an unverified tale about a specific individual.

The Cost of Viral Misinformation

Celebrities often become targets of exaggerated or fabricated stories that spread quickly online. When such claims blur the line between fact and fiction, they can stigmatize individuals and trivialize serious health issues. Discussing alcohol harm is important — but it should be done accurately, ethically, and without scapegoating.

Bottom Line

There is no credible evidence that Adele drank 25 bottles of wine in one night, stayed sober, or suffers from alcoholism. The story appears to be a viral exaggeration rather than reality. Conversations about alcohol and health matter — but they should be grounded in facts, not rumors.

Attached is a news article regarding alcoholism 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/c26x122kmwyt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Abramovich Seeks to Release £2.5bn Chelsea Proceeds for Ukraine Support

Roman Abramovich has renewed efforts to unlock £2.5 billion from the sale of Chelsea FC, pledging the money to support Ukraine following Russia’s full-scale invasion.

The funds have been frozen in the UK since 2022, when Abramovich sold Chelsea under a special government licence after being sanctioned over alleged links to the Kremlin. From the outset, the billionaire committed to placing the entire net proceeds into a foundation dedicated to humanitarian assistance connected to the war in Ukraine.

A Deal Trapped by Sanctions

Abramovich sold Chelsea in May 2022 to a consortium led by Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital. While the club changed hands, the proceeds were locked in a UK bank account, pending approval from UK government regulators. Officials have insisted that any release must comply strictly with sanctions and ensure the money is used exclusively for humanitarian purposes—such as aid for refugees, medical relief, and reconstruction—rather than any military activity.

Renewed Push to Free the Funds

Sources close to the process say Abramovich has intensified discussions with UK authorities to resolve legal and technical hurdles delaying the transfer. His representatives argue that prolonged freezing undermines the original pledge to help civilians affected by the conflict and that a clear governance structure can guarantee transparent, humanitarian-only spending.

Political and Legal Sensitivities

The case remains politically sensitive. Critics question whether Abramovich should retain any influence over how the funds are distributed, given the sanctions regime and the broader context of Russia’s war against Ukraine. The UK government has signalled it will not authorise a release unless there are watertight assurances on oversight and compliance.

What Happens Next?

If approved, the £2.5bn would represent one of the largest private humanitarian commitments linked to the war, potentially funding long-term relief and rebuilding efforts. Until an agreement is reached, however, the money will remain frozen—symbolising the complex intersection of sport, geopolitics, and sanctions that followed Russia’s invasion from Russia.

For now, the world watches to see whether a breakthrough can finally turn the Chelsea sale proceeds into tangible support for those suffering from the war’s devastation.

Attached is a news article regarding abramovich being told to give out 2.5 billion to support the war in Ukraine 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2e64lr3zeo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Dramatically Expands U.S. Travel Ban, Doubling the Number of Affected Countries

Washington, D.C. – December 17, 2025 — President Donald J. Trump has significantly expanded a sweeping travel ban that restricts or prohibits entry to the United States for citizens of dozens of foreign countries, intensifying one of the hallmark policies of his administration’s immigration crackdown.  

In a proclamation announced by the White House on December 16, 2025, Trump more than doubled the number of countries subject to either full bans or partial entry restrictions, bringing the total to 39 nations whose citizens now face barriers to entering the United States. The expanded policy is set to take effect January 1, 2026.  

What the Expansion Entails

Under the updated travel restrictions:

Five countries were added to the list of those whose citizens are fully banned from entering the U.S.: Burkina FasoMaliNigerSouth Sudan, and Syria.  

Individuals traveling on Palestinian Authority-issued documents are also barred entirely, marking a notable escalation in the policy’s scope.  

Laos and Sierra Leone, which previously faced partial bans, were upgraded to full bans.  

15 additional countries now face partial restrictions, affecting certain immigrant and non-immigrant visas. These include nations such as Angola, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe, among others.  

Those with already-issued visas, lawful permanent residents, diplomats, and certain categories of travellers such as athletes and people entering on behalf of U.S. interests may still be exempt from the new limits.  

Administration’s Justification

The White House defended the expanded travel ban as necessary for national security and immigration control, citing concerns about inadequate vetting systems, unreliable civil documentation, visa overstay rates, and insufficient cooperation from foreign governments. Officials said the United States must “raise its entry standards” to protect Americans.  

The move follows a wave of attention to immigration policy after the recent shooting in Washington, D.C., in which two National Guard members were killed by a suspect who had entered the U.S. as an immigrant. The Trump administration has cited that incident as underscoring perceived weaknesses in current vetting procedures.  

Reactions and Criticism

The expanded ban has sparked backlash from legal advocates, human rights groups, and international leaders. Critics argue it discriminates based on nationality, undermines long-standing U.S. values on immigration and asylum, and could strain diplomatic relations with affected countries. Some advocacy organizations also warn that the policy may harm global cooperation on security and commerce rather than strengthen U.S. safety.  

There have also been calls from leaders in Africa and other impacted regions seeking clarification and engagement with U.S. officials, given the broad geographic spread of newly restricted countries.  

Looking Ahead

The expanded ban reflects an ongoing Trump administration focus on tightening immigration policy through executive action. The White House has indicated that countries could be removed from the restricted list if they improve security screening and cooperation with U.S. authorities, though no formal delistings have been announced.  

The policy is expected to face legal challenges and political debate as it begins to take effect next year, shaping one of the most contentious aspects of U.S. immigration policy going into 2026.

Attached is a news article regarding countries that face bans on being allowed in to America 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Key Facts (Verified Reports)

A 15-year-old boy has been charged with the murder of a nine-year-old girl named Aria Thorpe in Weston-super-Mare, Somerset.  

The incident occurred at a residential address on Lime Close in the Mead Vale area, where police were called on Monday evening.  

Aria Thorpe was pronounced dead at the scene, and a preliminary post-mortem found she had suffered a single stab wound.  

The teenager was arrested near Worle shortly after the emergency call and has since been charged with murder.  

He is due to appear at Bristol Magistrates’ Court.  

Authorities and the community are in shock, and police say they are working with local schools and support services to help those affected.  

Official Statements and Investigation

Avon and Somerset Police have expressed condolences to Aria’s family and appealed for privacy and calm, emphasizing support for the community and ongoing investigations.  

What Is Known and What Isn’t

For legal reasons, the suspect’s name cannot be published because he is a minor. Details about motive, the relationship between the suspect and Aria, or further background have not been released at this stage while the case is before the courts.  

If you’d like, I can help you write a full news article based on the verified information available so far — just let me know the tone and audience you’re aiming for (e.g., local news, national paper, blog post, etc.).

A 15-year-old boy has been charged with murder following the death of nine-year-old Aria Thorpe.

The incident happened in Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, at a residential address in the Mead Vale area.

Emergency services were called on Monday evening, where Aria was found seriously injured.

Aria Thorpe was pronounced dead at the scene despite efforts by paramedics.

A preliminary post-mortem examination indicated she suffered a stab wound.

The suspect was arrested shortly after the incident and later formally charged.

Due to his age, the boy cannot be named for legal reasons.

The teenager is due to appear before Bristol Magistrates’ Court.

Avon and Somerset Police are leading the investigation and have appealed for privacy for the family.

Local schools and support services have been offered specialist support as the community comes to terms with the tragedy.

No motive or relationship details have been released while court proceedings are ongoing.

Conclusion

The death of nine-year-old Aria Thorpe has left Weston-super-Mare in deep shock, raising painful questions about youth violence, safeguarding, and the pressures facing young people today. With a 15-year-old boy charged with murder, the case now moves into the judicial process, where facts will be examined and justice pursued through the courts.

As the investigation led by Avon and Somerset Police continues, authorities have urged the public to avoid speculation and allow the legal process to run its course. The focus remains on supporting Aria’s grieving family, her friends, and a community struggling to comprehend such a devastating loss. Tributes and vigils reflect a shared sense of sorrow — and a collective hope that lessons will be learned to help prevent tragedies like this from happening again.

Attached is a news article regarding aria a nine year old girl murdered by a 15 year old boy 

https://news.sky.com/story/boy-charged-with-murder-of-nine-year-old-girl-as-victim-named-13484630

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Tuesday, 16 December 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Signs Executive Order Declaring Fentanyl a ‘Weapon of Mass Destruction’ in Escalation of U.S. Drug Policy

Washington, D.C. — December 15, 2025 — President Donald J. Trump has signed a sweeping executive order formally designating illicit fentanyl and its core precursor chemicals as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), a move that dramatically reframes the United States’ approach to the ongoing opioid crisis as a national security issue.  

Speaking at a White House event honoring service members involved in border security operations, Trump said the designation was necessary to confront what his administration views as a deadly onslaught of synthetic opioids entering the United States. “With this historic executive order… we are formally classifying fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction — because that’s what it is,” the president declared.  

What the Order Does

Under the executive order, illicit fentanyl — the powerful synthetic opioid responsible for tens of thousands of overdose deaths annually — and its chemical precursors are defined as WMDs. The order directs federal agencies, including the Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, Treasury, and Defense, to take “appropriate action” to eliminate the threat posed by the drug and its supply chains.  

Officials argue the designation empowers U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies to use tools traditionally reserved for countering nuclear, chemical, or biological threats against drug trafficking networks. It also bolsters Trump’s earlier moves to label major cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, a step that has already underpinned military actions against suspected smuggling operations at sea.  

National Security Framing and Military Involvement

The White House has emphasized that the fentanyl crisis is not merely a public health issue but a national security emergency. Trump and allies have cited the relatively small lethal dose of fentanyl and the enormous number of overdose fatalities as justification for the WMD categorization.  

The shift dovetails with an increasingly militant posture toward narcotics trafficking: since early September, U.S. military forces have carried out more than 20 strikes on vessels suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean and Pacific, resulting in at least 90 deaths — actions the administration frames as part of a broader armed conflict with criminal networks.  

Political and Policy Reactions

Supporters of the order, including Senator Jim Banks (R-Ind.), praised the designation as a necessary escalation to protect American families and confront what they describe as narco-terrorism and geopolitical challenges posed by precursor chemical flows from abroad. Banks’ own legislative efforts pushed toward defining fentanyl as a chemical threat in U.S. law.  

However, experts and critics have expressed deep skepticism about both the label and its potential effectiveness. Drug policy specialists and scholars note that fentanyl has not been used as a weapon in the way chemical agents have historically been, and they warn that militarizing a public health crisis could undermine treatment and prevention efforts. “It is not obvious to me that this is a threat,” said one expert on drugs, crime and terror research.  

Legal analysts also caution that expanding military and national security authorities into drug enforcement could strain international cooperation, blur civil-military roles, and raise constitutional questions.  

What Comes Next

It remains unclear how the new designation will play out in practice. While Trump’s executive order does not itself create new laws, it reframes the federal government’s strategic priorities, potentially allowing for harsher prosecutions, broader sanctions, and expanded use of intelligence resources against trafficking networks.  

Public health advocates fear that equating a substance with legitimate medical uses to a weapon of mass destruction may further stigmatize patients and distract from harm-reduction strategies proven to save lives.

As Washington digests the implications of this unprecedented policy shift, lawmakers from both parties and international partners will likely debate whether this new framework strengthens America’s hand against fentanyl trafficking—or whether it conflates two separate crises with far-reaching consequences.

 Attached is a news article regarding trump signing fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/12/16/trump-fentanyl-weapon-mass-destruction/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Faces Backlash Over Xenophobic Tirade Targeting Somali Immigrants

Former US president Donald Trump is facing renewed criticism after delivering a speech widely condemned as xenophobic, in which he launched a verbal attack against Somali immigrants living in the United States. The remarks, made during a recent campaign-style appearance, have sparked outrage among civil rights groups, community leaders, and elected officials, who warn that such rhetoric risks inflaming racial hatred and deepening divisions.

Remarks Spark Outrage

During the speech, Trump portrayed Somali immigrants as a threat to public safety and social cohesion, using sweeping generalisations that critics say unfairly stigmatise an entire community. Advocacy organisations described the language as inflammatory and misleading, arguing it reinforces harmful stereotypes and ignores the positive contributions Somali Americans have made to US society.

Human rights groups said the comments echo some of the most controversial moments of Trump’s presidency, when his hardline immigration stance included travel bans and aggressive deportation policies. They argue that the rhetoric is particularly dangerous at a time of heightened political tension, where minority communities already face rising levels of harassment.

Community Leaders Respond

Leaders from Somali American communities — many of whom fled civil war in Somalia and rebuilt their lives in the US — expressed deep concern over the impact of the remarks. In cities such as Minneapolis, home to one of the largest Somali populations in North America, organisers warned that such statements can translate into real-world consequences, including hate crimes and discrimination.

“Words from political leaders matter,” one community advocate said. “When a former president speaks this way, it gives permission to others to treat Somali people as outsiders, regardless of how long they’ve lived here or how much they’ve contributed.”

Political and Legal Criticism

Democratic lawmakers and several Republicans also criticised the speech, accusing Trump of using immigrants as political scapegoats. Some pointed out that Somali Americans serve as doctors, small business owners, teachers, and even members of the US armed forces — a reality they say is erased by Trump’s rhetoric.

Civil liberties organisations warned that the language could violate the spirit, if not the letter, of protections against incitement and discrimination. While Trump has defended his comments as “telling the truth” about immigration, legal experts caution that repeated dehumanising language can undermine democratic norms.

A Familiar Pattern

This is not the first time Trump has been accused of xenophobia. Throughout his political career, he has repeatedly targeted specific ethnic and religious groups, often during campaign periods. Analysts note that such rhetoric tends to resurface when Trump seeks to energise his political base, particularly on issues of immigration and national identity.

Critics argue that focusing on Somali immigrants distracts from broader policy debates and reduces complex social issues to simplistic and harmful narratives.

Wider Implications

The controversy has reignited debate about the responsibility of political leaders in shaping public discourse. Anti-racism campaigners warn that normalising attacks on one community risks setting a precedent that could be turned on others.

As the backlash continues, Somali American organisations are calling for unity and urging political leaders across the spectrum to reject what they describe as divisive and dangerous rhetoric. Whether the criticism will have any lasting political impact on Trump remains unclear, but the episode has once again highlighted the deep fault lines surrounding immigration, race, and power in American politics.

Attached is a news article regarding Trump facing criticism over xenophobic tirade against Somali immigrants 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-garbage-rhetoric-about-somalis-draws-cheers-administration-silence-2025-12-04/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Inside the pound-printing factory: how Britain’s currency is made

Cash still matters. Every day millions of coins clink and banknotes change hands across the UK — and behind every coin and polymer note is a tightly controlled, highly technical manufacturing process. Here’s a clear, behind-the-scenes look at how British currency is made: from design and security features to printing, minting, quality control and distribution.

Two factories, two crafts

The UK’s money is produced in two very different kinds of factories:

Banknotes for England and Wales are issued by the Bank of England and printed on its behalf under contract at a high-security printing works in Debden, Essex (operated by specialist security printers). The site handles everything from sheet printing to final cutting and despatch.  

Coins — pennies to £2 pieces, plus commemorative and bullion coins — are struck at The Royal Mint in Llantrisant, Wales, a mechanised foundry and striking plant that converts raw metal into finished legal tender.  

Both operations run to stringent security and quality standards, but the techniques and materials are very different.

The story of the modern banknote: polymer and high tech

Since 2016 the Bank of England’s notes have been produced on polymer — a thin, durable plastic — rather than traditional cotton paper. Polymer allows much tougher, longer-lasting notes and enables advanced security elements such as transparent windows, holograms and complex foils that are extremely difficult to copy. The Bank explains polymer’s advantages in durability and forgery resistance.  

From design to sheet

1. Design & artwork — Artists and security specialists work together on the note’s visual themes (portraits, historical figures, imagery) while integrating security features that must align exactly with printing plates and transparent windows.

2. Substrate preparation — Polymer sheets (the base material) arrive ready for printing — often with features such as the clear window already formed (suppliers and exact steps are tightly controlled).

3. Multi-stage printing — The sheet goes through several specialist printing presses:

Offset/toner printing for colourful backgrounds and images.

Intaglio (raised-ink) plates for tactile ink used in portraits or value numerals — the raised feel helps both authentication and accessibility.

Foiling and patch application for metallic strips and holographic elements.

UV and microprinting steps add covert security elements visible only under special light or magnification.

4. Inspection and cutting — After printing the sheets are inspected (often partly automated with human oversight), then guillotined into individual notes, counted, banded and packed for distribution to banks.  

Security and secrecy

Banknote manufacture is a high-security business: the printing works are in guarded, access-controlled facilities; all staff undergo vetting; movement of sheets is minimised; and quality control processes discard or securely destroy imperfect items. The Bank of England publishes overview material about lifecycle and security, but much of the detailed know-how is confidential for obvious reasons.  

Scale and lifecycle

There are billions of Bank of England notes in circulation and the Bank closely manages supply and replacement. Worn notes are returned, assessed and destroyed; older designs are withdrawn as needed. The Bank publishes figures and explains how new notes are introduced and older ones removed.  

How the Royal Mint makes coins

Coin production is an industrial metal-working process rather than printing.

1. Alloy & casting — The mint starts by creating the correct alloy (e.g., cupro-nickel, nickel-brass) in furnaces and rolling it into large coils.

2. Blanking — The coiled metal is fed into presses that punch out round blanks (the undecorated discs that become coins).

3. Annealing & cleaning — Blanks are heat-treated (annealed) and cleaned so the metal is soft enough and surface-ready for striking.

4. Die making — Master designs are engraved (now often CNC-assisted) and hardened into dies — the negative images that will be stamped onto blanks.

5. Striking — High-tonnage presses strike the blanks between obverse and reverse dies. Modern presses can strike hundreds of coins per minute; commemorative and proof coins are struck more gently and often multiple times for sharp detail.

6. Edge treatment & plating — Some coins get milled edges, edge-inscriptions or plating (e.g., bi-metallic £2), and are inspected, counted and bagged.  

The Royal Mint also runs recycling and sustainability programmes (including recovery of metals and redeploying waste streams) and operates distinct production lines for circulation coins, commemorative pieces and bullion.  

Technology, people and reassurance

Both banknote and coin production blend heritage craft with cutting-edge technology. Intaglio printing, die-engraving and presswork are centuries-old arts; today they sit alongside laser engraving, automated optical inspection, anti-counterfeit nanotechnology and sophisticated supply-chain controls.

For the public the important takeaway is simple: producing legal tender is an expensive, secure, closely supervised national function. The systems are designed so counterfeiters are kept at bay, circulation stays reliable, and cash remains accessible for people who need it most.

Want to go deeper

If you’d like, I can:

produce a step-by-step illustrated explainer showing each stage of a banknote or coin’s journey; or

write a shorter “what you’ll see if you visit” tour-style piece about Debden and Llantrisant (what’s public and what’s always off-limits).

Sources: Bank of England explainer on polymer notes and the Bank’s account of the Debden printing works; official overviews of the Royal Mint’s coin production and recent Royal Mint sustainability reporting.  

Attached is News article regarding inside the pounds printing factory were Britains currency is manufactured 

https://news.sky.com/story/bank-of-england-currency-printer-de-la-rue-in-300m-sale-13233434

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36
















Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  UK Education Standards Under Scrutiny as Cheating and System Abuse Rise Concerns are growing...