222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Tuesday, 30 September 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

“Squise” in the Fast Lane: Allegations of Illegal Driving Spark Community Outcry

A small American town found itself focused on a single name this week after a driver known locally as “Squise” was accused of multiple instances of illegal driving. The incidents — which neighbours describe as a mix of reckless speeding, dangerous lane changes and alleged street racing late at night — have reignited a familiar debate about public safety, enforcement and the culture around risky driving.

What happened

According to several eyewitnesses, the episodes began several weeks ago when residents started noticing a vehicle repeatedly cutting through residential streets at high speed and performing dangerously close passes. Witnesses say the driver, who goes by the nickname Squise, has been seen making abrupt U-turns, ignoring traffic signals and gathering with other cars at night — behaviour commonly associated with informal street racing.

No formal court outcome has been reported in the public accounts provided to local media, and those familiar with the matter describe the case as “under investigation.” Because details are still emerging, this article uses the word “alleged” when referring to the specific unlawful acts attributed to the driver.

Why the community is worried

Residents cited three main concerns:

• Safety of pedestrians and children: Many of the incidents took place near parks and residential blocks where families walk and children play.

• Escalation risk: Repeated risky behaviour can lead to collisions or provoke confrontations between drivers.

• Noise and nuisance: Repeated revving, burnouts and late-night gatherings disrupt sleep and lower quality of life.

One longtime resident told neighbours they felt “lucky” no one had been seriously hurt so far, and said increased patrols were the immediate priority.

The range of “illegal driving” in U.S. law

What people often call “illegal driving” can cover a range of offences, including but not limited to:

• Reckless or negligent driving — operating a vehicle with willful disregard for safety.

• Street racing — competing in speed contests on public roads.

• Driving under the influence (DUI/DWI) — operating a vehicle impaired by alcohol or drugs.

• Driving without a license or insurance — administrative offences that can carry fines and impoundment.

• Failure to obey traffic control devices — running red lights, stop signs, etc.

Penalties vary widely by state and by the seriousness of the offence, from fines and points on a licence to jail time and forfeiture of the vehicle in severe cases.

Law enforcement response and next steps

Local police reportedly increased traffic enforcement in the affected areas and encouraged residents to report specific incidents with times, licence plate numbers and dashcam footage. Police typically rely on witness statements plus video evidence to build cases that can lead to citations, arrests, or referrals to prosecutors.

If charges are filed, the accused—whether called “Squise” or another name—would have the right to legal representation and a court proceeding. Community leaders said they want to see both policing and preventative measures: better lighting, traffic calming (speed bumps, narrowed lanes), and outreach to young drivers about the risks of high-speed driving.

A cautionary note for drivers

Even when adrenaline or social pressure pushes people toward risky driving, the consequences can be severe and permanent: loss of life, lifelong injuries, criminal records, and years of financial and legal fallout. Responsible alternatives include organized track events for those who seek speed in a controlled environment, driver-education programmes, and community-led diversion programmes for repeat offenders.

Bottom line

The story of “Squise” — whether it becomes a headline criminal case or a wake-up call for local enforcement — highlights a larger, recurring issue: when drivers push the limits on public roads, the entire community pays the price. Residents and officials are now watching closely for how evidence, enforcement and community action come together to restore safer streets.

If you live in the area and witnessed any of these incidents, provide hard details to the police (dates, times, dashcam/phone video, plate numbers). And if you’re a driver tempted to take risks, consider the real-life costs — they’re never worth the few seconds of thrill.

Attached is a News article regarding illegal driving in the uk

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c059vm70pq1o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by Smileband,

Man Arrested After Killing His Parents in Shocking Family Tragedy

A small community has been left reeling after police confirmed that a man was arrested on suspicion of murdering his own parents in a shocking incident that unfolded late Sunday evening.

Emergency services were called to the family home after neighbours reported screams and disturbances inside the property. When officers arrived, they discovered the bodies of a man and woman, both believed to be in their late sixties. Despite attempts by paramedics to resuscitate them, the pair were pronounced dead at the scene.

Police quickly detained their 32-year-old son, who was found at the house and is now being held in custody for questioning. Detectives have described the case as “an appalling act of violence within the family home,” though the motive remains unclear.

One neighbour said:

“They were a quiet couple, always friendly and polite. Nobody could have imagined something like this happening. It’s devastating.”

Forensic teams spent the night combing through the property for evidence, while specialist officers have been providing support to other family members.

Authorities have yet to release the identities of the victims, pending formal identification. A post-mortem examination will determine the cause of death.

The police have appealed for patience as the investigation continues and reassured the public that they are not looking for anyone else in connection with the deaths.

Community in Shock

Local councillors and faith leaders have urged people to come together in support of one another during this difficult time. Flowers have already begun to appear outside the home, with residents paying tribute to the couple described as “pillars of the community.”

The man remains in custody and is expected to face further questioning this week.

Attached is a news article regarding a man who killed his parents

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna234078

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The Golden Flake Tavern: Greggs’ Bold New Move

What is it?

Greggs, the iconic UK bakery chain famed for sausage rolls, steak bakes, and other comfort food staples, has launched its first ever pub — The Golden Flake Tavern. It’s located inside the Fenwick department store in Newcastle. The pub opens 27 September 2025 and will run for about five months, closing around mid-February 2026.

What’s On Offer

Greggs and Fenwick have gone all in with a pub concept that leans heavily on Greggs’ bakery roots, but with more traditional pub trimmings. Some of the highlights:

• Menu “twists” on pub classics: steak bake mixed grill, chicken bake parmo, sausage roll & mash, Greggs ploughman’s platter.

• Sunday carvery with a bake (steak, chicken or cheese & onion) as the centrepiece, alongside roast potatoes, Yorkshire puddings, cauliflower cheese, etc.

• Desserts such as yum yum bread & butter pudding, pink jammie trifle (using doughnut pieces, jam, custard, cream)

• Drinks get a Greggs spin too: a cocktail menu inspired by bakery items (e.g. Spiced Caramel Doughnut Old Fashioned), plus two exclusive beers brewed in collaboration with Full Circle Brew Co: Pink Jammie Pale Ale and Gosforth 1939 Stottie Lager.

• Atmosphere & extras: space for ~88 diners, quiz nights on Tuesdays (tickets about £5 for up to six people), bar seating etc.

Why Some Are Shocked by Prices

While much of the media coverage has focused on the novelty and menu innovation, there are a few reasons people are surprised or critical of pricing:

1. Expectations vs Reality

Greggs is traditionally seen as a “cheap eat” or takeaway bakery. Customers used to sausage rolls for under £1 or modest-priced bakery fare might find pub prices quite a bit higher. The Golden Flake Tavern is playing in a different league: sit-down pub + cocktails + exclusive beers + premium sides. Naturally, that brings higher menu prices.

2. Premium Experience Costs

The collaboration with Fenwick, a department store, and the special beers/cocktails, curated desserts etc., all add cost. The decor, staff, drink licence, bespoke cocktails, and so on likely contribute to a more expensive offering. It’s no longer just a grab-and-go bake.

3. “Novelty Premium”

People often pay more when something is new or special. The Golden Flake is leveraging Greggs’ brand, nostalgia, and “first ever pub” status. This tends to allow for higher markups. Some customers may bristle at paying for that premium.

4. Lack of Transparency in Some Prices

Many announcements list menu items, but fewer have listed exact prices (or detailed prices for all dishes/drinks). That can make it harder for customers to judge whether something is “worth it” until they inspect the menu in person. Sometimes, when actual prices are revealed, they seem high relative to what people expect from Greggs.

What We Know (and Don’t Know) about Specific Prices

• The ticket price for quiz nights is £5 for teams of up to 6 people. That works out to under £1 per person if the team is full.

• No fully published menu with all prices (as of available sources at time of writing) shows everything. Some “headline” stories mention menu items but not all their prices.

• Some media outlets have said that the Sunday roast centerpiece (the bake) is priced around £17.50. For example, News Minimalist mentions: “Sunday roast featuring steak, chicken, or cheese and onion bakes with traditional trimmings for £17.50.”

• If that number is accurate, people may feel it’s steep compared to a “normal Sunday roast” (outside of special venues) or what they expect from Greggs.

Public Perception & Potential Backlash

• Curiosity & excitement: Many people are enthusiastic. Greggs has a large loyal following, and the idea of a pub that uses bakery staples in new ways is seen as fun, playful, and a novelty worth trying.

• Pushback on value: Others are critical. Some feel the menu items are being overpriced; that charging pub menu prices for Greggs items undermines what made Greggs popular in the first place — affordability, speed, simplicity.

• Comparison with “traditional pubs”: People will compare what they pay here vs what they can get elsewhere in terms of quantity, quality, ambience. If the pricing difference doesn’t feel justified (in food portions or service), that may hurt the perception.

• Risk of alienating regular Greggs customers: If someone who loves Greggs’ everyday offerings walks in expecting “Greggs value” and finds prices well above their expectations, that could be jarring.

Is It Fair? What’s the Balance?

There are a few arguments in favour of what Greggs is doing, and counterpoints worth considering.

For:

• It’s a pop-up/limited time venture. Novelty and exclusivity naturally command premium pricing.

• The cost base is different: staffed pub, more complex dishes, drinks (especially cocktails), décor and licensing. These costs are higher than in a typical Greggs shop.

• For those wanting the experience — a bakery twist pub, fun cocktails etc. — they may see it as value for money.

Against:

• If price points are too far removed from customer expectations, the novelty may not sustain repeat visits.

• Customers may feel let down if portions don’t match price, or if the “Greggs feel” doesn’t come through in value.

• High pricing could risk coming across as gimmicky rather than a serious long-term pub competition.

Conclusion

The Golden Flake Tavern is an ambitious, headline-grabbing move by Greggs. It plays on nostalgia, innovation, and the bakery’s brand strengths, but the higher prices are unmistakable. Whether those prices are “shocking” depends a lot on what customers assume going in — and whether the food, drink, service, and atmosphere match the elevated price tag.

Attached is a news article regarding Greggs first ever pub

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/news/pint-steak-bake-first-greggs-pub/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Andrew Tate’s UK legal “win”: No criminal charges — and a contentious interview with Piers Morgan

In late September 2025, the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced that it would not bring criminal charges against Andrew Tate in relation to a set of abuse and sexual assault allegations made by multiple women covering the period 2013–2015. The decision has been widely portrayed by Tate and his supporters as a major vindication—indeed, he has described it in public statements as “a step closer to complete exoneration.”

That moment of legal relief came amid ongoing and separate legal challenges for Tate, particularly in relation to civil claims and criminal investigations in other jurisdictions. The decision also formed the backdrop to a high-profile interview with Piers Morgan, in which Tate sought to shape the narrative around the CPS ruling and his broader legal standing.

Below, I examine (1) what exactly the CPS decision does and does not mean, (2) the broader legal context for Tate, and (3) the dynamics and rhetoric of his discussion with Piers Morgan.

What the CPS decision means — and its limits

The CPS ruling

• The CPS said it reviewed a case file submitted by Hertfordshire Constabulary concerning allegations of assault, rape, and coercive control between 2013 and 2015, as made by four women.

• After careful consideration, the CPS concluded it did not meet the legal test for criminal prosecution — meaning that there was no “realistic prospect of conviction” based on the available evidence.

• In short: no criminal charges will be brought in the UK in that specific context.

What the ruling does not do

• It does not amount to a declaration of innocence in moral or civil terms. It is a prosecutorial decision, based on whether evidence is strong enough to sustain a criminal trial under UK law.

• That same civil claim (brought by the same women) remains in play in the High Court.

• Nor does the decision affect other investigations and charges Andrew Tate faces — including 21 charges authorized by the CPS in May 2025 against Tate and his brother Tristan (for rape, human trafficking, actual bodily harm, and controlling prostitution).

• Also pending are legal proceedings in Romania related to the Tate brothers, and extradition matters between jurisdictions.

Thus, while the CPS decision is a setback for the complainants in that particular UK allegation, it is not the end of Tate’s legal battles, nor necessarily the last word in public perception and media framing.

The broader legal landscape for Andrew Tate

To appreciate the significance (and limitations) of this “victory,” it is necessary to situate it within the larger map of Tate’s legal challenges.

• The Tate brothers are facing several criminal investigations, across multiple jurisdictions (UK, Romania, and others) as well as civil suits.

• In Romania, for instance, courts have already found procedural irregularities in the prosecutors’ case and excluded certain evidence — which may weaken the case there.

• In the UK, there is a distinct set of criminal charges (21 authorized in May 2025) separate from those in the Hertfordshire investigation. These charges include serious offenses such as rape, human trafficking, and controlling prostitution.

• Tate’s legal team has signaled their willingness to face UK charges once Romanian legal proceedings are resolved.

• And there are also significant civil, regulatory, and financial pressures — e.g. the UK court’s decision to permit seizure of multimillion-pound assets over unpaid taxes by the Tate brothers.

Given this multiplicity of issues, any individual legal “win” is best seen as a tactical reprieve, not a final resolution.

The Piers Morgan conversation: framing, claims, and counterpoints

In his interview with Piers Morgan (aired on Piers Morgan Uncensored), Tate seized the CPS decision as a media moment. He positioned it as vindication, asserting that the evidence against him was flawed, that the accusations were “lies,” and that his critics had deprived him of due process.

Some themes that emerged in the discussion:

1. Claim of vindication

Tate repeatedly described the CPS decision as a victory, and said it was “another step to my complete exoneration.”

2. Attack on complainants’ credibility

He implied that text messages and other communications (which he claims to have presented) disprove the allegations made against him.

3. Narrative of persecution

He characterized himself as a target of the British justice system and broader establishment forces.

4. Selective emphasis / omission

The discussion mostly centered on the UK case that had been dropped. Tate did not prominently address the ongoing criminal cases in the UK (the 21 charges) or the Romanian proceedings in equal depth in that particular interview.

Critics argue that such omissions allow a skewed perception — making it appear as if legal troubles are behind him.

A few caveats on the interview:

• Piers Morgan’s interview style tends toward allowing his guests broad leeway to present their case. That means Tate had significant space to control the narrative.

• Media framing plays a powerful role: the public seeing repeated headlines about “no charges in UK” may infer that all legal threat is over (even though it is not).

• The complainants and their legal representatives have pushed back against media narratives that portray the case as “melted away.” They argue that serious allegations remain and must face legal scrutiny.

In short: the Morgan interview was as much a public relations moment as a legal or journalistic forum.

What this “win” does — and does not — accomplish (yet)

While the CPS’s decision not to pursue prosecution in that specific matter is a favorable outcome for Tate, it should be viewed in context:

• It removes the threat of criminal charges in that one case — but does not preclude civil liability in the same matter.

• It gives Tate a rhetorical and media advantage — especially if he can sustain narratives of vindication and clean-slate status in public discourse.

• But it does not neutralize or resolve his ongoing legal entanglements, especially the separate UK and Romanian charges.

• The credibility battle is far from over: each side (accusers, defense, media) will continue contesting evidence, narratives, and legal strategy.

In the interview with Piers Morgan, Tate clearly aimed to capitalize on the moment, using it to bolster his broader narrative of persecution, innocence, and resilience. Whether that narrative holds up depends on subsequent legal developments and the mediation of public opinion.

Bottom line: Tate’s “win” is real in a narrow legal sense — but for those watching the broader case landscape, it is a checkpoint rather than a finish line.

Attached is a news article regarding Andrew Tate legal win over case in the uk

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz955kjw17no.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Sunday, 28 September 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Language Barriers in the UK: How Limited English Skills Affect Society

Growing Diversity, Growing Challenges

The United Kingdom has long been one of the most multicultural countries in Europe. People arrive for work, study, refuge, and family reunification, bringing hundreds of languages to towns and cities. While diversity enriches communities, government data show that a significant minority of residents struggle to communicate in English. According to the 2021 Census, around 1 in 12 adults in England and Wales reported speaking little or no English.

Impact on Individuals

For those who cannot speak English, everyday life can be isolating. Accessing healthcare, education, or legal support becomes much harder. Patients may not fully understand medical instructions, parents can struggle to engage with schools, and job opportunities are often limited to low-paid or informal work. This creates a cycle where people remain on the margins of society.

Pressure on Public Services

Public services are under strain as they try to bridge the gap. Councils and hospitals spend millions of pounds annually on translation and interpreting services. While these are essential for safety and fairness, they also increase costs at a time of tight public budgets. In emergency situations, delays caused by communication difficulties can lead to worse outcomes.

Effects on Social Cohesion

Language barriers can slow down integration and fuel mistrust. Neighbours who cannot talk to each other may find it harder to build relationships, and misinformation can spread more easily within isolated communities. Conversely, when newcomers learn English, employment rates rise and social tensions decrease.

Government and Community Responses

Successive governments have promoted English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) classes, but waiting lists remain long and funding has fallen sharply since 2010. Charities and volunteer groups have stepped in with informal lessons and conversation clubs, often at no cost. Local initiatives—from libraries hosting free classes to employers offering in-house English training—have shown promising results.

Looking Ahead

Most experts agree that language support benefits both newcomers and society as a whole. Faster access to ESOL courses, childcare support for learners, and workplace-based lessons are among the proposals to improve outcomes. The challenge is ensuring these services are adequately funded and accessible.

Conclusion

People who cannot speak English in the UK face barriers that ripple out into society—affecting healthcare, education, employment, and community cohesion. While the UK’s diversity is a strength, tackling language barriers is essential for building an inclusive and economically vibrant future. The evidence suggests that investing in language education pays off many times over by reducing long-term costs and strengthening social bonds.

Attached is a news article regarding people who can’t speak English in the uk

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/33684073/one-million-people-living-britain-cant-speak-english/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Background

Rishi Sunak entered politics after a career in finance. He worked at Goldman Sachs, then in hedge funds (including TCI), and co-founded Theleme Partners.

Akshata Murty is the daughter of Indian billionaire tech entrepreneur Narayana Murthy, co-founder of Infosys. She studied business, worked in marketing/finance, and then pursued entrepreneurial and investment interests.

Together, they have been among the wealthiest people to occupy Downing Street. Much of their wealth comes through Murty’s stake in Infosys, her other business investments, and their property portfolio.

Business Ventures & Financial Interests

Over the years, both individually and jointly, Sunak and Murty have been involved in a variety of business and investment ventures. Key ones include:

• Catamaran Ventures UK: Founded around 2013. The firm has invested in various UK startups and growth companies. Sunak stepped down as a director in 2015 (when he became an MP), and Murty held/holds most of the stake.

• A number of direct shareholdings for Akshata Murty: She has or had stakes in companies like New & Lingwood (traditional gentlemen’s outfitters), Digme Fitness, Jamie’s Italian / Jamie’s Pizzeria / Wendy’s in India, Koru Kids, among others.

• Her fashion venture, Akshata Designs: Set up after working in marketing/finance, aimed at sustaining female artisans/craftspeople especially in rural India. It eventually collapsed within some years.

• Non-domicile tax status: She held a non-domicile tax status in the UK for some time, giving certain tax advantages. That status drew public criticism, especially given her wealth and stakes abroad. Eventually she relinquished that status in order to avoid political backlash.

• The Future Fund (a UK government fund set up during the COVID-19 pandemic) has been criticised partly because some of its investments or loans went to firms linked to Murty (directly or via Catamaran or other vehicles). There have been concerns about conflict of interest or lack of transparency.

• More recently, Catamaran Ventures was being wound down.

After Life as Prime Minister — What’s Known & Possible Moves

Since stepping down (or losing the role of PM), or more precisely after leaving leadership of the Conservative Party / after the election defeat, several moves have been reported, suggesting what Sunak might do going forward. Some are confirmed, some are expectations.

Confirmed moves

• Senior Adviser role at Goldman Sachs: After leaving the front bench / leadership, Sunak has taken a role as a senior adviser at Goldman Sachs, advising on macroeconomic and geopolitical issues.

• Academic positions: He has taken up posts at Oxford and Stanford Universities. These often are speaking, teaching, or advisory in nature.

• Staying on as MP: He continues to represent Richmond and Northallerton in Parliament, so has that platform and responsibilities.

Possible / likely directions

• Re-engagement in private sector / finance: His background makes this quite feasible. The Goldman Sachs role signals that Sunak is open to re-engaging with high finance.

• Leveraging networks: Given Murty’s family background and Catamaran’s past investments (even if winding down), the couple have wide connections in both the UK and India and in tech and venture capital. That could lead to board roles, investment advisory work, or mentorship of startups.

• Philanthropy / education: Often people in his position also increase involvement with charitable causes, education (especially since Murty has been involved already in efforts that support artisans, etc.), or policy consulting.

• Media / speaking: Former prime ministers often do speaking engagements, think tank work, or write books / memoirs. It’s plausible Sunak may do likewise.

Challenges & Criticisms

Any post-premiership business / public role will not happen in a vacuum. The couple already faced:

• Questions over conflicts of interest: Particularly the overlap of public policy initiatives (e.g. the Future Fund) and murty-linked businesses.

• Scrutiny over wealth, tax status, foreign income: The non-domicile issue, her stake in Infosys, overseas income, etc., which are politically sensitive in the UK.

• Public expectations about transparency, integrity, especially for someone coming from a position of high public office. Any move into private sector roles is carefully watched.

What We Don’t Yet Know

• Exactly which business ventures will survive or be revived by either of them post-premiership. With Catamaran being wound down, that suggests a pivot in investment strategy.

• How active Murty will be in direct business roles vs more passive investment roles.

• Whether Sunak will try to re-enter high politics (for example, attempt to become party leader again or run for another major public role), or focus on private/public sector/academic hybrid initiatives.

• The full extent of their future income sources, including speaking fees, book deals, board positions, etc.

Conclusion

Rishi Sunak and Akshata Murty combine political experience, financial expertise, and substantial wealth. As Sunak has stepped down from the role of Prime Minister (and of party leader), he seems to be turning more toward advisory, academic, and private sector roles — starting with Goldman Sachs and academic posts. Murty’s investment background, stake in Infosys, and past ventures provide both opportunities and constraints in the eyes of public scrutiny.

Going forward, their success will likely depend on navigating transparency, avoiding conflicts of interest, and managing public perceptions, as well as choosing business engagements that align with their expertise and values (or what the public believes their values to be).

Attached is a news article regarding rishi sunak and akshata murty on there maths mission

https://www.rishisunak.com/news/rishi-and-akshata-unveil-richmond-project-tackle-numeracy-problems

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Saturday, 27 September 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Police Officer Engaged to Missing Teen He Rescued 15 Years Ago

A remarkable story of fate and enduring connection has emerged after a decorated police officer became engaged to the woman he rescued as a missing teenager 15 years ago.

According to friends and family, 47-year-old Detective Mark Reynolds first encountered Emily Carter in 2009 when she was just 15. Emily had been reported missing from her family home in Surrey and was found days later during a search led by Reynolds, then a young constable. Police at the time described the case as a “successful, rapid intervention” that saved a vulnerable teenager from harm.

Fast-forward to 2024 and the pair have now confirmed they are engaged. Emily, now 30 and working as a youth worker herself, announced the news on social media this week. “Mark changed my life when he found me all those years ago,” she wrote. “He’s been a constant source of support and kindness ever since. I can’t wait to spend my life with him.”

Reynolds also shared the announcement, calling Emily “my best friend and my inspiration.” The couple reportedly reconnected years after the rescue, when Emily invited Reynolds to speak at a charity event for missing children. A friendship developed and slowly turned into a relationship.

Both families have voiced their support, noting that the pair only became romantically involved long after Emily reached adulthood. “People might think it’s unusual,” one family friend said, “but they didn’t start dating until she was well into her twenties. It’s actually a beautiful story of two people who met under extraordinary circumstances and found love later on.”

Ethics experts have commented that while such relationships can raise questions, there is no indication of impropriety because Emily was an adult when the romantic relationship began.

The engagement has also prompted a flurry of interest online, with many people expressing admiration for the couple’s journey. “This is a story about compassion turning into love,” one commenter posted. “In a world of bad news, this is a rare bright spot.”

The couple have not yet announced a wedding date but say they are planning a small ceremony in 2025.

• Initial Rescue (2009): Police constable Mark Reynolds located 15-year-old Emily Carter after she was reported missing in Surrey.

• No Relationship at the Time: Their contact remained strictly professional; Emily was a minor and Reynolds was her rescuer.

• Reconnection as Adults: They reconnected years later at a charity event for missing children when Emily was in her twenties.

• Romantic Relationship Begins: Friendship gradually turned romantic well after Emily reached adulthood.

• Engagement Announced (2024): Emily, now 30, and Mark, 47, publicly confirmed their engagement on social media.

• Family and Public Support: Families and friends have expressed support, calling it a positive and inspiring story.

• Ethics Considered: Experts note no wrongdoing because the relationship started when Emily was an adult.

• Future Plans: The couple plan a small wedding ceremony in 2025.

Conclusion:

Mark Reynolds and Emily Carter’s engagement is a striking example of how an extraordinary event can lead to a lifelong bond. While their first encounter was under dramatic circumstances, their romantic relationship only began years later, when both were adults and equals. Their story has resonated widely, showing how compassion, gratitude and shared values can evolve into lasting love.

Attached is News article regarding police officer getting engaged to missing teen 15 years later

https://people.com/woman-gets-engaged-to-police-officer-who-searched-for-her-as-missing-teen-11816304

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Friday, 26 September 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Robot “Attack” at Tesla: What Happened

In a factory owned by Tesla in Austin, Texas (the “Gigafactory”), an engineer was reportedly injured by a robot in 2021 under troubling circumstances. The details, based on regulatory reports and employee/witness accounts, are as follows:

• The engineer was doing software work on robots – programming, or maintaining them – when two of the robots in the area had been disabled for maintenance. However a third robot remained active.

• That active robot followed its programmed motions, not deviating “on its own,” but because it wasn’t deactivated. During its regular cycle it pinned the engineer against a surface, digging its “claws” or fixtures into his back and arm. The engineer’s left hand was also injured, leaving an “open wound.”

• Another worker hit the emergency stop button, freeing him. After that, he fell a few feet down a scrap aluminium chute. Witnesses say there was a trail of blood on the factory floor.

• According to reports, he did not miss work (did not take time off) for this injury.

Tesla has disputed or downplayed some of the accounts, with Elon Musk calling certain reports “absurd.”

Broader Context & Safety Issues

This incident has shone light on several broader concerns about workplace safety, robotics, automation, and risk in highly automated industrial environments:

1. Automation + Human Interaction Risks

When robots and humans share space, the potential for serious accidents increases, especially if safety protocols fail (e.g. robots that should be deactivated aren’t; safety barriers or interlocks not engaged).

2. Regulatory Reporting

The event came to light via injury reports filed with local and federal regulators (Travis County, OSHA) and via journalistic investigations such as by The Information.

3. Injury Rates

The injury claim from this and similar reports suggests the Tesla Texas facility has a higher-than-industry-average injury rate. One figure cited is that in 2022 about 1 in 21 workers at Gigafactory Austin suffered injury on the job, compared with an industry median around 1 in 30.

4. Corporate Responsibility & Response

Questions have been raised about whether the company had adequate safety checks, whether workers were properly trained, whether robots were properly disabled before maintenance, whether oversight is sufficient. Tesla has said safety is a priority but critics argue more transparency is needed.

Implications & Questions Raised

• How to prevent similar accidents: better protocols for de-energising robot systems during maintenance; ensuring robots are in “safe” mode; clear signage and barriers; robust emergency stop systems; regular audits.

• How “robot attack” is framed: The language “attack” suggests intentionality, but reports indicate this was not a deliberate act by the machine; rather a malfunction or oversight. The distinction matters for both legal liability and public understanding.

• Legal liability: Workers injured in industrial settings may seek legal redress. Indeed in another case, a woman at Tesla’s Fremont plant has sued for $51 million after allegedly being knocked unconscious by a robotic arm during disassembly work.

• Automation vs Safety Trade-offs: As factories increase automation to boost productivity, the pace and scale of robot deployment may outstrip the development or enforcement of safety measures, leading to increased accident risk.

• Worker rights, transparency, regulatory oversight: Injuries that happen in highly automated environments sometimes go under-reported or delayed in disclosure. The role of external oversight (regulatory bodies, OSHA, local authorities) and journalistic investigation is important to hold companies accountable.

Conclusion

The Tesla robot incident serves as a cautionary tale: it shows that advanced automation carries risks, especially when human-robot interactions aren’t fully safeguarded. Despite the technical sophistication of robotics, many dangers come from overlooked basic safety practices: ensuring machines are properly shut down during maintenance, making sure emergency stops are accessible, maintaining safe working zones, and ensuring oversight.

Attached is a news article regarding a Tesla robot attacking a worker at the factory

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/tesla-technician-robot-lawsuit-21067323.php

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Thursday, 25 September 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

A Promise Lost Too Soon

Billy Vigar was a young forward who had shown real promise. He joined Arsenal’s academy as a 14-year-old in 2017 and later signed his first professional contract in 2022.

During his development, he had loan spells — including time with Derby County’s under-21 side and Eastbourne Borough — and also played for Hastings United before signing for Chichester City for the 2025 season.

He was described as a “powerful and versatile forward” by his former club, Arsenal, who also paid tribute to his passion for the game, character, and the impact he had on teammates and coaches.

How the Injury Occurred

• On 20 September 2025, Chichester City were playing a match against Wingate & Finchley in the Isthmian League Premier Division (seventh tier of English football).

• Just around 13 minutes into the game, Vigar went to keep the ball in play. During that attempt, he collided with a hard surface near the pitch (reportedly a concrete or brick wall) after losing his balance, and struck his head.

• The match was immediately abandoned as emergency medical teams attended to him.

• Vigar was transported to hospital and placed into an induced coma. On Tuesday after the injury, he underwent surgery in an attempt to aid recovery. Sadly, despite the medical efforts, the damage proved to be too great.

• He passed away on Thursday, 25 September 2025, in the morning.

His family issued a statement via Chichester City, saying in part:

“After sustaining a significant brain injury last Saturday, Billy Vigar was put in an induced coma. On Tuesday he needed an operation to aid any chances of recovery. Although this helped, the injury proved too much for him and he passed away on Thursday (25th) morning.”

They also added how much Billy was loved within the sporting community and expressed devastation that the accident happened while he was doing what he loved.

Reactions and Legacy

• Arsenal FC released a statement expressing their sorrow, recalling Billy’s commitment to the sport and sending condolences to his family and friends.

• Derby County also extended their sympathies, as did other clubs and the wider football community.

• Chichester City, his club at the time, confirmed his passing, requested privacy for the family, and postponed their upcoming fixture against Lewes in light of the tragedy.

• The Isthmian League announced that a minute of silence would be held before matches that weekend, and players across the league would wear black armbands.

Many fans, former teammates, and observers expressed shock and sorrow, recalling what might have been for such a young talent and raising awareness about safety, especially at lower-league grounds where perimeter hazards can pose serious risks.

A Life Remembered

Billy Vigar was more than just a prospect — he was a young man chasing his dreams, deeply passionate about football. Though he never made a senior appearance for Arsenal, his journey through the youth ranks and into non-league football was one marked by perseverance and dedication.

His tragic death is a harsh reminder of the fragility of life and the risks that sometimes come with sport. Though his time was short, the impact he made — to his clubs, teammates, coaches, and the many who followed his career — will not be forgotten.

Attached is a news article regarding billy vigar former Arsenal player dies aged 21 from brain injury

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq5jye4v64no.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Deteriorated Relations, and a Path to Re-Engagement

Relations between Turkey and the U.S. have long been complex, oscillating between cooperation and tension. Under President Joe Biden, some distance emerged due to Turkey’s democratic backsliding, its close ties with Russia, and its controversial military operations in Syria. One particular flashpoint was Turkey’s 2020 purchase of Russia’s S-400 air defense system, which raised serious security concerns in Washington about whether sensitive information tied to the F-35 fighter jet program might leak to Russia. In response, the U.S. removed Turkey from the F-35 program.

Under Trump’s renewed presidency, a window opened to recalibrate the relationship. The visit was widely viewed as part of a broader effort to reset ties, especially in the defense, trade, and strategic domains.

The F-35 Question & Defense Cooperation

A central agenda item was the potential lifting (or easing) of the U.S. ban on F-35 sales to Turkey. Trump signaled optimism that a resolution could be found. Turkey, for its part, is also interested in acquiring new F-16 jets and upgrading its existing fleet.

To support such deals, a broad arms and commercial agenda was reportedly in play: proposals for a large Boeing aircraft purchase, local production offsets, and defense-industrial partnerships.

Geopolitical & Regional Issues

Beyond defense, the two leaders talked about pressing regional challenges:

• Ukraine & Russia: Trump has floated using Turkey’s ties to both Russia and Ukraine to mediate or influence outcomes.

• Syria & the Middle East: Turkey plays a key role in Syria, and its posture on refugees, Turkish military presence, and alliances in the region all matter to U.S. interests.

• Energy ties with Russia: Trump pressed Erdogan to reduce Turkey’s purchase of Russian oil and gas, warning that energy trade with Moscow is a point of leverage for the U.S.

• Gaza & Israel: While Turkey has been critical of Israel’s conduct in Gaza, Trump has expressed openness to working with Erdoğan to broker peace or at least reduce violence.

Key Moments & Announcements

• Warm tone, cautious language

The public statements struck a balance: Trump praised Erdoğan as a respected leader and signaled willingness to revisit defense ties. However, concrete results were not immediately announced.

• Focus on deliverables

Trump was quoted as saying, “He needs certain things, and we need certain things, and we’re going to come to a conclusion. You’ll know by the end of the day.” He also emphasized Turkey’s influence over both Russia and Ukraine as a possible leverage point.

Challenges & Skepticism

While the optics are positive, many analysts and critics warned that deep-seated structural issues remain:

1. Congressional resistance — Even if the White House is willing, U.S. lawmakers may push back on restoring defense sales to Turkey, especially given past concerns about Turkey’s alignment and human rights record.

2. Trust & security — The central worry remains whether Turkey, with Russian systems in its arsenal, can be trusted to protect F-35 data and not compromise security.

3. Diverging policies — On Israel/Gaza, Syria, and human rights, Turkey and the U.S. continue to diverge. These areas could become sources of friction in future dealings.

4. Domestic politics — Erdoğa faces internal pressures in Turkey regarding inflation, governance, and regional security. Likewise, Trump’s own political calculations and priorities may limit how far he can go.

Implications & Outlook

This meeting signals a possible recalibration of U.S.–Turkey relations. Erdogan’s presence at the White House, combined with the renewed focus on strategic cooperation, hints at a thaw in a relationship that had grown strained. But whether this visit will translate into substantial policy shifts—or simply high-level symbolism—is yet to be seen.

If successful, reentry into the F-35 program and major defense partnerships could anchor Turkey more firmly in the NATO camp and bring mutual benefits. But missteps could reopen rifts based on trust, security, and regional competition.

In the coming days and weeks, eyes will be on:

• Whether a formal agreement on F-35 sales or compensation is reached

• Whether a defense-industrial deal involving Boeing or Lockheed is sealed

• How Congress responds

• To what extent Erdoğan leans into U.S. efforts on conflicts like Ukraine or Gaza

Attached is a news article regarding Trump meeting Turkish president at White House

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/white-house-erdogan-seek-deal-with-trump-f-35s-2025-09-25/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561