222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Wednesday, 5 November 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Google’s Project Suncatcher: sending TPU-powered AI data centres into orbit

Google just put a bold, slightly sci-fi idea on the table: build data-centre-class clusters in low-Earth orbit that run AI workloads on the company’s Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), powered directly by sunlight. The effort—announced publicly as Project Suncatcher—combines solar power, high-performance ML accelerators, optical links and orbital systems research to test whether the next wave of AI computing can be scaled off-planet.

What Google is proposing

At a high level, Project Suncatcher envisions constellations of solar-powered satellites that each carry ML accelerators (Google’s Cloud TPUs) and can be networked together to perform distributed machine-learning tasks. The company says the idea is a long-term research “moonshot” to explore whether space could help meet explosive demand for AI compute while reducing some of the environmental and land-use impacts of terrestrial data centres. Google plans initial prototype satellites and hardware tests to validate compute, thermal management, radiation tolerance and optical inter-satellite communications.

Early timeline and partners

Google has revealed plans to launch two prototype satellites—each carrying a small number of TPUs—as demonstrators, with target launches around the early 2027 timeframe. The company is partnering with satellite builder/operator Planet Labs on those early flights. The prototypes are intended to test how TPU hardware and ML models actually behave in low-Earth orbit (LEO) and to validate laser (optical) links between satellites for high-bandwidth data exchange.

Why go to space? The claimed benefits

Google and many analysts point to several potential upsides:

• Abundant solar energy. Solar panels in LEO can produce far more power per unit area than on the ground because they avoid atmospheric losses and can be oriented for continuous sunlight during parts of each orbit—making sustained, high-power compute more feasible without drawing terrestrial grid capacity.

• Reduced terrestrial footprint. Moving some compute off-planet could reduce land, water and local electricity use associated with hyper-scale data centres—factors that have become politically and socially sensitive in many regions.

• Closer to some data sources. In the future, certain workloads (e.g., Earth observation analytics, wide-area sensor networks, or space-native services) might benefit from compute that already sits in space rather than routing everything to Earth.

The tech at the heart: TPUs in orbit

Google’s TPUs are purpose-built ML accelerators used widely inside Google Cloud for large language models, image recognition and other deep-learning tasks. Project Suncatcher specifically explores using these accelerators (Google has discussed testing Trillium / v6e TPU variants) in a radiation-and-vacuum environment—measuring how total ionizing dose (TID) and single-event effects (SEEs) affect reliability and performance. Those tests are central to deciding whether TPUs can run fault-tolerant ML workloads in LEO.

Hard engineering puzzles

The idea is compelling, but the engineering and operational challenges are substantial:

• Radiation and reliability. Space radiation can cause bit flips, component degradation and catastrophic failures. Google is testing TPUs in proton beams and other environments to quantify risks and mitigation strategies.

• Thermal management. Waste heat must be dumped to space; without atmosphere you can’t rely on convective cooling, and radiators or other thermal designs become mandatory. Designing efficient, lightweight thermal systems for sustained high-power ML chips is nontrivial.

• Bandwidth and latency. To be useful as a distributed data centre the satellites need very high-bandwidth optical links (inter-satellite and to ground) and smart data routing so that large model weights and datasets can move efficiently without prohibitive latency. Google plans to validate optical links in prototypes.

• Launch and lifecycle emissions. Rocket launches currently emit significant carbon; the program’s environmental case relies on long operational lifetimes and favourable lifecycle accounting versus building many more terrestrial centres. Critics and researchers will scrutinize the net climate impact.

The competitive landscape

Google isn’t alone—other companies and startups are exploring orbital compute, and hardware vendors are investigating radiation-tolerant accelerators. Companies such as NVIDIA-adjacent projects, Starcloud, and other space-data-centre startups are advancing similar ideas, making this a nascent industry race to prove who can safely, affordably and sustainably put useful compute into orbit.

What success looks like (and the unknowns)

A successful Project Suncatcher would demonstrate that TPUs and ML models can operate reliably in LEO, that optical networking can deliver data centre-class bandwidth, and that economics and lifecycle emissions make sense compared with building on Earth. Even if prototypes succeed, scaling to thousands of satellites, safe orbital operations, regulatory coordination (spectrum, space-traffic management, astronomy impacts) and cost-effectiveness will remain open questions.

Bottom line

Project Suncatcher is an ambitious research programme that reframes the data-centre problem as a systems engineering and orbital design challenge. It mixes well-known Google ingredients—TPUs, sustainability goals and large-scale systems research—with the physical constraints of space: radiation, heat, communication limits and launch economics. Whether orbital AI data centres become a mainstream part of the cloud ecosystem or remain an intriguing niche will depend on the next two years of prototype testing and careful assessment of performance, cost and environmental trade-offs. For now, Google has taken the conversation out of the lab and into low-Earth orbit—and that alone makes the idea worth watching.

Attached is a news article regarding goggle building AI centres in space powered by TPU chips

https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/technology/news/story/google-is-sending-ai-chips-to-space-sundar-pichai-unveils-project-suncatcher-to-harness-power-of-the-sun-2813891-2025-11-05

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Tuesday, 4 November 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Nigeria’s Leader Hits Back at Trump Over Threat of Military Response to Killings of Christians

Nigeria’s President has sharply rebuked former U.S. President Donald Trump after Trump suggested that Washington could take military action in response to a recent wave of attacks targeting Christians in Nigeria. The comments have triggered diplomatic tensions between the two nations, as Abuja accused Trump of “reckless interference” and “playing politics with tragedy.”

Speaking at a rally in Texas over the weekend, Trump condemned what he described as “a genocide of Christians” in Nigeria and vowed that if he returned to the White House, the United States “would not stand idly by.” He further stated that “if the Nigerian government cannot protect Christians, America will.” His remarks were widely interpreted as a threat of possible military involvement or sanctions.

In a strongly worded statement, Nigeria’s President responded, calling Trump’s remarks “deeply irresponsible and inflammatory.” He said, “Nigeria is a sovereign nation with a proud history of defending its people. We do not need lectures or threats from anyone, least of all from those who have never faced the complexities of our security challenges.”

The Nigerian government insisted that it is taking “decisive action” against extremist groups responsible for attacks in the Middle Belt and northern regions, where violence between armed militias, bandits, and insurgents has left hundreds dead in recent months.

Officials in Abuja also accused Trump of exploiting Nigeria’s tragedy for political gain. “This is not about religion — it is about terrorism, banditry, and criminality,” a senior government spokesman said. “The attempt to turn this into a Christian-versus-Muslim narrative only deepens divisions and undermines peace efforts.”

Trump’s comments were met with mixed reactions in Nigeria. Christian leaders and advocacy groups welcomed his strong words, saying international pressure could force the government to act faster. However, Muslim organizations and civil society groups warned that such rhetoric could inflame tensions and destabilize an already volatile situation.

Analysts say the dispute highlights a growing concern about Nigeria’s worsening insecurity and the international community’s frustration with the government’s response. The country, Africa’s most populous nation, has faced years of violence from Boko Haram insurgents, Islamic State affiliates, and local militias.

While the Nigerian presidency reaffirmed its commitment to religious freedom and human rights, it urged “foreign politicians to speak responsibly and seek cooperation, not confrontation.”

As diplomatic tensions simmer, observers warn that Trump’s remarks could influence U.S.-Nigeria relations, especially if he returns to political prominence. For now, Abuja appears determined to project strength and sovereignty — even as it struggles to restore peace within its own borders.

Attached is a news article regarding Nigeria leader hit back at Trump

https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/articles/c78ze441422o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

What is the claim

The central idea is that Israel and/or pro-Israel actors are actively trying to persuade Christian believers — especially evangelical Christians — to adopt or support Zionism (broadly: the ideology supporting a Jewish national homeland in Israel) or Christian Zionism (the view that Christians have a theological stake in Israel’s land and people). In this version, the suggestion is: “Israel is investing in or encouraging efforts to ‘turn Christians on to Zionist ideas’”.

The user’s phrasing “3.2 million” may refer to a number of Christian supporters, or a budget/figure, or may be a mis-quotation or mis-reading of statistics. I found no credible, robust source stating exactly “3.2 million” Christian converts or “3.2 million budget” for such an endeavour — I discuss the numbers below.

Why this matters

There are several intersecting issues here:

• The role of Christian Zionism in global politics and its connection to Israel.

• The politicisation of religion and how theological beliefs influence geopolitics.

• How Israel engages with Christian communities (both domestic and abroad) and how that fits with its state-interests.

• The implications for Christian-Jewish relations, for Palestinian Christians, and for how religion and nationalism intersect.

Understanding these dynamics is valuable for anyone writing about Israel’s foreign policy, evangelical movements, the Middle East, or the intersection of religion and geopolitics.

What we actually know

Christian Zionism and its scale

“Christian Zionism” refers to Christian support (often evangelical) for Israel based on theological conviction: for instance, that Israel fulfilling biblical prophecy is a sign of the end times, or that Christians should support the Jewish people because of the Bible.

Some facts:

• The organisation Christians United for Israel (CUFI) claims over 10 million members in the U.S. alone.

• Surveys show that among U.S. white evangelical Protestants, 82% said Israel was given to the Jewish people by God, versus 40% of Jews in one survey.

• The number of Christian Zionists globally is harder to measure, but analysts suggest it may run into the tens of millions.

So: yes — there is a substantial Christian-Zionist constituency. Whether it was “turned on to Zionism” specifically by Israeli government efforts is a separate question.

Engagement by Israel and Christian Zionist organisations

There is evidence that the Israeli government and Israeli-friendly organisations engage with Christian Zionists. For example:

• According to a recent article, the “vast majority of Zionists in the world are Christian” (i.e., Christian Zionists), and the Israeli government is aware of that and cultivates relations.

• Christian Zionist groups provide funding for Jewish immigration to Israel (aliyah) and for settlement activity in areas such as the West Bank (Judea/Samaria).

• The Israeli government has been receptive to Christian Zionist advocacy, especially during the governments of Benjamin Netanyahu and earlier leaders.

Motivations and mechanisms

Why would Christian Zionists support Israel? Some motives include:

• Theological: belief that the return of Jews to Israel is a fulfilment of biblical prophecy.

• Political/strategic: Christian Zionist support provides Israel with diplomatic cover, financial backing, and tourism flows. (The Times of Israel article notes Christian support is a key global asset.)

• Israeli incentive: Engaging with Christian Zionists gives Israel allies among key evangelical constituencies in the U.S. and elsewhere, which matter for funding, diplomacy, and narrative.

Mechanisms:

• Pilgrimages and organised tours of the Holy Land for evangelicals to build affinity with Israel.

• Financial partnerships: Christian Zionist organisations funding aliyah or settlement programmes.

• Political rhetoric: Israeli political leaders referencing biblical themes, emphasising religious-historical linkages with Christian and evangelical audiences.

Critique & complexity

• While Christian Zionism is large, it is not monolithic; there is variation in how it is practiced, what theology underpins it, and how political its expressions are.

• There is push-back: younger evangelicals show waning support for Israel, according to polling.

• For many Jews and Israelis, the idea of accepting Christian Zionist funding or support is uncomfortable due to theological and historical issues.

• The term “Zionism” itself is contested — some Christians who support Israel may not self-identify as Zionists in the same way Jewish Zionists do, and may have a theological motivation that is distinct from the mainstream political Zionist movement.

So, what about “3.2 million”

I was unable to locate a credible source that states “3.2 million Christians turned on to Zionism by Israel” or a budget of “3.2 million” tied specifically to such a campaign. It may be a mis-reading, conflation, or mis-quote of some statistic (for example “3.2 billion NIS” investment in rehabilitation in southern Israel — though not about Christians).

Without a verifiable figure, one should treat the “3.2 million” number as unsubstantiated in public sources.

My assessment

• The idea that Israel (or pro-Israel institutions) are seeking to mobilise Christian supporters and build Christian Zionist networks is well supported by available evidence.

• The idea that “turning Christians on to Zionism” is purely a religious conversion project is less clear — more accurately it is a network-building and alliance-building effort.

• If the claim is framed as “Israel is spending millions to persuade millions of Christians to support Zionism” — then it is plausible in broad strokes, but specific numbers (like “3.2 million”) are not publicly verifiable as far as I could find.

• The phenomenon must be understood in context: global evangelical networks, Israeli foreign-policy and diplomacy, theological motivations, and the geopolitics of the Middle East.

• It raises significant ethical and political questions: the relationship between religion and nationalism; the rights of Palestinian Christians; the implications of foreign-based religious-political mobilisation; and how Israel’s engagement with Christian Zionism affects its diplomacy with other groups.

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The Pacific Ocean: Earth’s Vast and Vital Blue Frontier

The Pacific Ocean, the largest and deepest body of water on Earth, covers more area than all the landmasses combined. Stretching from the icy coasts of Antarctica in the south to the Arctic in the north, and from Asia and Australia in the west to the Americas in the east, the Pacific spans an incredible 63 million square miles. It is not only a geographical marvel but also a vital force shaping our planet’s climate, ecosystems, and human civilizations.

A Giant of the Seas

The Pacific Ocean was named by Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan in 1521, who called it “Mar Pacifico,” meaning “peaceful sea.” Despite its name, the Pacific can be anything but calm—its vast expanse is home to powerful storms, massive waves, and the infamous “Ring of Fire,” a region of intense volcanic and seismic activity that encircles much of its basin.

At its deepest point, the Mariana Trench, the ocean plunges nearly 36,000 feet (11,000 meters) below the surface—deeper than Mount Everest is tall. This mysterious abyss, along with countless other underwater mountain ranges and trenches, remains one of Earth’s least explored frontiers.

A Cradle of Life and Culture

The Pacific Ocean supports an extraordinary diversity of life. Coral reefs, such as Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, teem with marine species found nowhere else on Earth. Millions of people rely on the Pacific’s fisheries for food and income, making it a lifeline for communities from Indonesia to Chile.

Culturally, the Pacific has connected civilizations for thousands of years. Ancient Polynesians navigated its vast waters long before modern instruments, using stars, ocean swells, and bird flight patterns to travel between islands. Their seafaring traditions remain a cornerstone of Pacific Island identity today.

Climate and Environmental Importance

The Pacific Ocean plays a central role in regulating the global climate. It absorbs vast amounts of carbon dioxide and heat, acting as a natural buffer against climate change. However, this balancing act comes at a cost—warming waters, coral bleaching, and rising sea levels are threatening marine habitats and coastal communities.

Events like El Niño and La Niña, which originate in the Pacific, have far-reaching effects on weather patterns worldwide—causing droughts, floods, and shifts in temperature that impact agriculture and economies.

Challenges and the Future

Pollution, overfishing, and plastic waste pose major threats to the Pacific’s delicate ecosystems. It’s estimated that millions of tons of plastic enter the ocean each year, forming massive garbage patches that endanger marine life. Efforts are underway by governments, conservationists, and international organizations to clean up these waters and protect the biodiversity within them.

Sustainable fishing practices, marine reserves, and technological innovations in ocean monitoring offer hope for preserving this vital resource. The Pacific is also emerging as a focal point in discussions about renewable energy, with advances in wave and tidal power showing promise for a cleaner future.

A Shared Responsibility

The Pacific Ocean touches the lives of billions, even those far from its shores. It drives weather systems, provides oxygen, and connects continents through trade and culture. Protecting this immense blue expanse is not just an environmental duty but a global necessity.

As humanity continues to explore, utilize, and depend on the Pacific, the world must also work collectively to ensure its health and survival—for the ocean’s sake and for our own.

Attached is a news article regarding the Pacific Ocean

https://www.cbsnews.com/tag/pacific-ocean/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Scientists Observe the Most Energetic Flare Ever Recorded from a Supermassive Black Hole

In a groundbreaking astronomical discovery, scientists have detected the most energetic flare ever observed from a supermassive black hole — a burst of energy so intense that it briefly outshone the combined light of its entire galaxy. The event has provided researchers with unprecedented insight into the mysterious and violent behavior of black holes at the hearts of galaxies.

The flare originated from a supermassive black hole located billions of light-years away, believed to be hundreds of millions of times the mass of our Sun. Using data from multiple space and ground-based observatories, including NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and the European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton observatory, scientists recorded a sudden eruption of high-energy radiation that lasted several hours before gradually fading.

Astrophysicists believe the flare was triggered when the black hole’s immense gravitational pull shredded a passing star or a dense gas cloud. As the stellar material spiraled inward, it heated up to millions of degrees, releasing colossal amounts of energy before disappearing beyond the event horizon — the point of no return.

“This is the brightest and most energetic flare we’ve ever witnessed from a black hole,” said Dr. Alicia Moreno, an astrophysicist at the European Southern Observatory. “It challenges our understanding of how black holes consume matter and how they convert that energy into powerful emissions.”

What makes this observation particularly significant is the range of energy detected. The flare emitted intense radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum — from visible light and X-rays to high-energy gamma rays. Researchers say this diversity offers a rare opportunity to study the complex physics near a black hole’s accretion disk, where gravity and magnetism interact in extreme ways.

Dr. Ryan Patel, a NASA researcher involved in the project, noted that the timing and magnitude of the event might point to previously unseen processes within the accretion disk. “We’re seeing energy outputs far greater than theoretical models predicted,” he explained. “This could mean magnetic reconnection — the same process that triggers solar flares on our Sun — plays a much larger role around black holes than we ever imagined.”

Supermassive black holes reside at the center of nearly every galaxy, including our own Milky Way, and occasionally reveal their presence through such bursts of radiation. However, events of this scale are exceedingly rare, occurring perhaps once in tens of thousands of years in any given galaxy.

The discovery opens new avenues for research, with scientists planning to monitor the black hole closely over the coming months to detect any follow-up activity. Advanced telescopes, including the James Webb Space Telescope and the upcoming Athena X-ray Observatory, will play a key role in examining the aftermath of this cosmic eruption.

“This flare is like a cosmic laboratory,” Dr. Moreno added. “It allows us to witness the extreme physics of black holes in action and helps us understand how these monsters shape the evolution of galaxies.”

As astronomers continue to analyze the data, this record-breaking flare stands as another reminder of the immense and awe-inspiring forces that govern our universe — and how much humanity still has to learn about the deepest, darkest corners of space.

Attached is a news article regarding record breaking flare seen in space

https://www.independent.co.uk/space/supermassive-black-hole-biggest-flare-b2858213.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

New York City in Crisis: Catastrophic Floods Expose Infrastructure & Inequality

The Event

Recently, New York City was hit by record‐breaking rainfall that resulted in deadly flooding. According to reports, at least two people died in basements inundated by water, after unusually heavy rain swept through parts of the city.

The National Weather Service recorded rainfall amounts such as 1.80 inches in Central Park and 1.97 inches at LaGuardia Airport — breaking previous records of 1.64 and 1.18 inches respectively.

In neighbourhoods such as Bayside in Queens, people described water rising waist‐deep, windows shattering under hydrostatic pressure, and homes being entirely submerged.

The Impacts

Human cost

• Lives lost: The fatalities in basements highlight a dangerous vulnerability for lower‐income residents who occupy those units.

• Health & stability: A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that many flood‐impacted renters lacked insurance and did not receive disaster assistance. The flood events disrupted housing safety and had knock‐on effects on mental and physical health.

Infrastructure & travel

• Transit and roads crippled: Flash flooding forced closures of subway lines, commuter rail and major roadways.

• Sewers overwhelmed: City officials admit the existing sewer and drainage system was not designed for the intensity of these storms. A $30 billion overhaul, spanning decades, has been acknowledged.

Socio‐economic fallout

• Insurance and property risk rising: With flood risk increasing, properties in vulnerable areas face reduced value, insurance premiums rising, or insurers pulling out.

• Inequity in exposure: Low-income renters (often living in basements or poorly maintained units) are disproportionately affected. The same storm that paralyses expensive downtown areas also devastates under-resourced neighbourhoods.

The Drivers

Climate change is amplifying the threat

A study concluded that this type of extreme rainfall in New York was “mostly strengthened” by human-driven climate change — perhaps up to ~20% more intense than it would otherwise have been.

Aging infrastructure & legacy design

Many parts of the city’s stormwater and sewer systems were built for lower‐volume rainfall events and weren’t intended for the sudden deluge seen recently.

Urban development & land-use constraints

With more surface cover, less pervious ground, and dense development, cities like New York have less capacity to absorb heavy rains — making flash flooding more likely.

Why This Matters

• Public safety: The risk of death in flash floods is higher in urban areas when unexpected downpours hit basements, roads and subway tunnels.

• Long term costs: The tens of millions (and likely more) spent on repair, rebuilding and recovery are just for one event. With frequency increasing, the aggregate cost is huge.

• Inequality & resilience gaps: Those most able to adapt (wealthier homeowners, businesses) stand a better chance of weathering the storm. Renters & vulnerable communities are left behind.

• Infrastructure investment imperative: The city acknowledges needing decades and billions of dollars of investment to upgrade. The timeframe and funding pose a major challenge.

What’s Being Done

• The city has begun prioritising upgrades: cleaning thousands of catch basins, increasing sewer capacity in hotspot areas (e.g., the $350 m Bushwick project) and coordinating with transit authorities to protect key infrastructure.

• State of emergency declarations in past events: For example in September 2023, after ~8 inches of rainfall, a state of emergency was declared for New York City, Long Island and the Hudson Valley.

• Research and policy focus: The Federal Reserve and other bodies are studying the social & economic impacts, particularly for low-income populations.

What Needs Attention

• Faster adaptation: Decades for full overhaul is too long given how quickly these events are occurring.

• Targeted protection for high-risk dwellings: Basements, lower-income homes and poorly maintained units must be prioritised for flood mitigation.

• Affordable insurance / disaster support: Many affected households had little or no insurance and no public assistance.

• Public education & early warning: Ensuring communities know how to respond when flash floods strike, especially in dense urban zones.

• Equity in resilience planning: Making sure infrastructure investment benefits all neighbourhoods, not just affluent ones.

Conclusion

The flooding in New York City is not merely an unusual storm event. It is a signal of how cities are being challenged by a confluence of climate change, outdated infrastructure and social inequality. Without concerted action — both to reduce future risk and to support those already vulnerable — the next deluge will likely leave even heavier tolls.

Attached is a news article regarding floods that are happening in New York

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37177128/new-york-city-floods/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Monday, 3 November 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Introduction

Donald Trump has once again grabbed headlines — this time by threatening military action against Nigeria over what he describes as an “existential threat” to Christians in the country. The dramatic escalation comes amid unrest in Africa’s most-populous state and raises serious questions of diplomacy, sovereignty and the intersection of religious freedom and security policy.

What Trump is saying

• Trump posted on his social media platform that Nigeria will be designated as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) for violations of religious freedom.

• He warned that the U.S. “will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria,” and may, he said, go into the country “guns-a-blazing … to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.”

• On a press flight aboard Air Force One, he did not rule out boots on the ground or air strikes: “Could be … a lot of things.”

• His justification: “They’re killing the Christians … in very large numbers. We’re not going to allow that to happen.”

What Nigeria’s response has been

• The Nigerian government emphasises that its constitution protects religious liberty for all.

• Nigeria said it welcomes U.S. assistance provided its territorial integrity and sovereignty are respected.

• Nigerian officials reject the claim that Christians are uniquely being massacred; they point to complex causes of violence that cut across religious lines.

• For instance: “No Christian genocide in Nigeria,” according to a spokesman for Nigeria’s foreign affairs ministry.

• The Oba Akiolu of Lagos took issue with the intelligence underpinning Trump’s claims, saying the data was not “properly verified”.

The context: violence in Nigeria

• Nigeria’s security challenges are enormous and multifaceted: extremist insurgency in the north (e.g., Boko Haram / ISWAP), herder-farmer and land conflicts in the Middle Belt, banditry, and communal clashes.

• Analysts at Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) say that while Christians have been killed, the violence is not uniquely or overwhelmingly targeting them; in some datasets more Muslims have died.

• One summary: “the data shows there were at least 389 cases of violence targeting Christians between 2020-25, causing at least 318 deaths; during the same period 197 attacks targeted Muslims causing at least 418 deaths.”

• In short: The question of whether Christians in Nigeria face an “existential threat” — as Trump puts it — is heavily contested.

Why this matters internationally

• U.S. foreign policy: The CPC designation is significant. Under the International Religious Freedom Act the U.S. can impose sanctions or restrict aid when a country is found to be engaged in “particularly severe violations of religious freedom”.

• Sovereignty issues: A military intervention or strike on Nigerian soil without its full consent would raise major diplomatic and international law questions. Nigeria has emphasised the need for respect for its sovereignty.

• Regional stability: Nigeria is central in West Africa. Escalating U.S. military involvement might ripple across neighbouring states and into existing counter-terror operations.

• Messaging to domestic audience: Trump’s remarks resonate with parts of his political base (evangelical Christians concerned with global Christian persecution). Commentators view it partly as a domestic signal.

Risks & criticisms

• Accuracy of claims: Critics argue the narrative of Christian genocide is overstated and lacks rigorous evidentiary support.

• Unintended consequences: A U.S. military strike could stoke anti-Western sentiment, inflame religious tensions, or strengthen extremist groups. Nigerian and security observers caution about this.

• Aid withdrawal: Cutting aid could hurt vulnerable populations and undermine long-term partnerships; it may also hamper counter-terror capacity in Nigeria.

• Nigeria-U.S. relations: The threat has already introduced strain; how this evolves will matter for investment, security cooperation and diplomatic ties.

Possible outcomes

• Nigeria may engage in diplomacy with the U.S. to avert sanctions or military action. Already, officials suggest a meeting may be in the works.

• The U.S. might follow through on aid cuts and impose restrictions tied to the CPC designation.

• Military action remains a possibility — Trump’s language is strong, but it is unclear how far the planning has proceeded or how Nigeria would react.

• Alternatively, it may remain rhetorically aggressive but not result in boots on the ground—serving more as leverage. Some analysts believe the tone is partly tactical.

What to watch for

• Official U.S. policy documents: Will the U.S. State Department formally designate Nigeria as a CPC and what sanctions will follow

• Nigeria’s response: Will they welcome deeper collaboration, or push back diplomatically or assertively?

• Ground-level data: Independent verification of violence by religion—will more transparent reporting emerge?

• Regional security impact: How will groups like Boko Haram or ISWAP react if U.S. involvement increases?

• Domestic U.S. politics: How this plays into upcoming elections, evangelical voters and U.S.–Africa policy.

Conclusion

Trump’s threat to intervene militarily in Nigeria over the killing of Christians marks a dramatic moment in U.S.–Nigeria relations. It sits at the crossroads of religious freedom advocacy, national sovereignty, geopolitical strategy and domestic politics. While the concerns about violence against Christians in Nigeria are serious, the framing of the issue — as a one-sided Christian genocide — is contested and may complicate constructive cooperation. Whether this confrontation leads to real action or remains a high-stakes bargaining chip will be one of the key developments to follow in the coming weeks.

Attached is a news article regarding Donald Trump threatening to attack Nigeria

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cev18jy21w7o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 Mews viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Michael Jackson: The $3.3 Billion Posthumous Empire and Who Gets the Royalties

When Michael Jackson died on 25 June 2009, his financial situation seemed dire — tens of millions of dollars in debt, a teetering empire of music-rights and real estate, and a legacy fraught with controversy.

Yet over the years since his passing, his estate has rebounded in spectacular fashion. Estimates suggest the estate has generated around US$3.2-3.3 billion since his death.

In this article:

• How Michael Jackson’s estate turned around → the key deals, catalogue sales and brand resurrection

• Breakdown of who receives royalties and how his will allocates the proceeds

• Some caveats and ongoing issue's

How did the estate generate billions after Jackson’s death?

At the time of his death, Jackson’s net worth was negative — The Guardian reports over US$500 million in debt.

Yet through savvy rights-management, catalogue sales, licensing, and brand exploitation, his estate has flipped the story:

• Streaming, new releases, box-sets, revival of his catalogue and music rights.

• Major catalogue deals: for example, his estate sold half of his stake in his publishing company Mijac Music to Sony Music Group for about US$600 million.

• Licensing of his name, image and likeness (NIL) — TV, documentaries, biopics, musicals (such as MJ: The Musical), merchandise, etc.

• Court rulings that allowed the estate to defend its valuation and keep rights intact.

Some estimate:

“Since his passing in June 2009, Jackson’s estate has generated an estimated US$3.2 billion.”

So while “earning 3.3 billion” is not a single lump sum but an aggregate (over many years, from many revenue streams), it reflects the vast financial power of his post-death legacy.

Who receives the royalties & proceeds from the estate

Here are the main components determining who gets what:

1. His will & trust structure

According to public summaries:

• Jackson’s will, filed in 2009, names his executors John Branca and John McClain to manage the estate.

• The will and related trust documents (the “Michael Jackson Family Trust”) specify the allocation of the estate: 20 % to children’s charities, remainder split between his mother and his children.

Specifically:

• 40 % to his three children (to be equally divided)

• 40 % to his mother, Katherine Jackson

• 20 % to one or more children’s charities

When Katherine Jackson passes away, her 40 % share is to revert to the children — meaning eventually the children will control about 80 % of the estate.

2. Executors / Estate management

The executors have a fiduciary duty to manage, protect and maximize the value of the estate’s assets (music catalogue, image likeness, real estate, licensing deals). They negotiate deals, sell or license rights, pay debts/taxes, and distribute income according to the trust and will.

3. Current royalty/-income streams

The estate continues to collect income from:

• Music streaming, album sales, digital downloads

• Synchronisation/licensing (films, ads, video games)

• Merchandising and brand rights (his name/image)

• Sale/licensing of rights to his songs/catalogue

4. Distribution to beneficiaries

Once debts, taxes, administrative costs and distributions to trusts are accounted for, the net revenue flows into the trust and is distributed to the beneficiaries above (children, mother, charity) in the proportions set out in the will.

So in simple terms: when you hear headlines that Jackson’s estate “earned $3.3 billion”, those earnings are managed by the estate and then pass (over time) through the trust structure to his children, mother and charities as per the will.

Some important caveats & ongoing issues

• The “US$3.2-3.3 billion” figure is aggregate revenue since his death, not a take-home profit or one-time payment.

• At his death Jackson had huge debts (reported over US$500 million) and the estate still has to deal with taxes (for example, the IRS challenged valuations).

• Not all rights are wholly owned by the estate: e.g., the Sony/ATV stake sale involved complex ownership, and not all catalogue income remains with the estate in perpetuity.

• When beneficiaries receive funds depends on the trust’s terms, distributions, tax and legal/regulatory obligations. Some distributions may be deferred until disputes resolve.

• The value depends on continuation of income streams; as copyrights expire or market tastes shift, future earnings could decline. Indeed, a court ruling valued Jackson’s likeness and some assets at surprisingly low numbers for estate-tax purposes.

Why this matters

The story of Michael Jackson’s estate is a textbook example of how an iconic artist’s post-humous brand, catalogue and likeness rights can become, effectively, a very large investment asset. It underscores:

• The power of music & popular-culture IP as a long-term revenue stream

• How proper estate/trust planning matters for high-value individuals

• The interplay of debt, taxation, valuation and rights-management in entertainment estates

• Who ultimately benefits when an artist passes on — heirs, family, charities

Attached is a news article regarding Michael earning 3.3 billion after his death

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattcraig/2025/10/31/the-highest-paid-dead-celebrities-of-2025/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561