Sunday, 30 November 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

David Gandy critiques Andrew Tate: a call for better male role models

On 30 November 2025, British supermodel David Gandy spoke out on BBC One’s programme Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, issuing a sharp criticism of Andrew Tate and warning that Tate’s version of masculinity is harmful for many young men. Gandy — well known for his high-profile modelling career and his own fashion brand — argued that there is “not enough narrative about good men” to counter what he described as a “disruptive” and “immature” portrayal of manhood promoted by Tate and others.  

 What Gandy said

Gandy pointed to the proliferation of unregulated social media content — where influencers like Tate can push extreme ideas — as a major problem. He said:

“When you’ve got unregulated information and the form of, should we say people like Andrew Tate who are sort of pushing a very immature, I would say, and disruptive idea of masculinity on to vulnerable young men, then that’s where the problem holds.”  

He emphasized that masculinity is “quite broad,” rejecting the notion that there is a single, rigid template for what it means to be a man. He warned that much of the content out there was pushing “this very extreme form of masculinity, wrong form,” and said there were “not enough good examples out there of good, kind men and things they do.”  

Gandy challenged stereotypes implying that men’s roles are being “taken over by women,” arguing instead for balance. He suggested many men — including those of his generation — are embracing new, more involved, and caring roles as fathers and partners.  

Why it matters — and the broader context

The remarks come amid growing concern in the UK about the influence of online personalities such as Andrew Tate: individuals who, through social media and other channels, broadcast messages often criticized as misogynistic, toxic or damaging.  

Some authorities have highlighted that such content may contribute to radicalisation of young men, possibly increasing risks of misogyny, online abuse, and harmful social attitudes.  

Gandy’s public statement adds a different — and influential — voice to these debates. As someone with a high-profile, mainstream career and broad appeal, he is in a position to reach a diverse audience that might not otherwise connect with the invitations to rethink what masculinity means. His call for “good men” to step up and provide healthier, kinder, more balanced role models may resonate widely — especially among younger men looking for guidance in a noisy online space.

What Gandy advocates instead

More positive examples of masculinity: Men who are kind, responsible, considerate and supportive — rather than those who glorify aggression, dominance or misogyny.

Recognition that masculinity isn’t one-dimensional: There is no single “right” way to be a man.

Balanced gender roles: Accepting that in modern relationships and families, roles are evolving — and that manhood doesn’t have to be defined narrowly by outdated stereotypes.

Responsible social media consumption: Being aware of how unregulated content can influence vulnerable people, especially the youth, and encouraging media literacy.

The reactions and potential impact

Gandy’s comments have stirred discussion because they come from within popular culture — not from activism or politics — and because they challenge the popularity of controversial figures like Tate at a time when their messages still command large audiences. Some might see his stance as a welcome corrective to toxic “influencer masculinity.” Others may view it as moralising or overly simplistic.

But regardless of perspective, the public airing of these concerns on mainstream media (via BBC One) underscores the urgency some feel about redefining masculinity for a modern generation. Gandy’s voice — polished, mainstream, celebrity-adjacent — may bridge a gap: reaching people who might otherwise dismiss institutional or academic critique, and prompting reflection among fans, peers, and younger men.

Attached is a news article regarding David gandy talking on subject with BBC News regarding Andrew Tate 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

A child molester who sexually abused a teenage girl before becoming 'Natalie' outlandishly claimed the jury only returned a guilty verdict because they had been hypnotised.

Natalie Wolf, who was previously known as Ryan Haley, was addressed by the victim in court, who said the defendant would always be considered as a man to her.

The defendant, now 47, groped the woman as a young teenager and left her fearing she would be raped in a sickening attack.

Newcastle Crown Court heard that she stayed silent about the terrifying ordeal, which happened in Washington, Tyne and Wear, but found the courage to report the incident years later as an adult.

Wolf, now of Byker, Newcastle, denied sexual activity with a child, but was convicted by a jury at trial and has now been jailed for three-and-a-half years with lifelong sex offender registration and sexual harm prevention order.

Wolf claims the conviction was as a result of a conspiracy that involved the jury, police and lawyers being 'hypnotised'.

The victim courageously read her impact statement in court at the sentence hearing and said: 'I am doing this not just for me, but for all the children and women who have been sexually abused by men.

Ryan Haley wants everyone to know him as Natalie Wolf, but in my eyes he is Ryan Haley, the man who sexually abused me.'

The woman said she was left with 'shame and self doubt' after her ordeal and her body felt like a 'battlefield'.

She added: 'Watching them celebrate their life, their body and their choices feels like salt in my wounds.'

Addressing the defendant, the victim said: 'Ryan, you destroyed me as a child, I kept this inside me for many years until I was strong enough to report it.

Today I get the chance to read my victim statement in court, today I am finally going to get the justice I have waited for.

Wolf, who self-represented at the hearing, said the victim was 'lying through her teeth' and complained about being assaulted while on remand in Durham Prison, a jail for men.

Judge Gavin Doig told Wolf: 'It is clear you believed you are the victim of a conspiracy involving the courts, prison service, the barristers in the case, your solicitor, the police, your family and a number of other people.

You make allegations in your notes I have read, most of which I will not repeat, but include someone hypnotising the jury or that the jury were planted by people so you would be convicted.

You suggest the victim may have hypnotised the police officer during her video interview.

At the end of the hearing Wolf asked to be released pending an appeal.

The judge urged the defendant to seek legal advice and added: 'You will not be released on bail pending that appeal.'

Attached is a news article regarding a man calling him self Natalie abused a teenage girl 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq8dky7qv8qo.amp

Article written by the daily mail 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

































Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Egypt’s Giants: The Enduring Mystery of Who Built the Pyramids

For generations, the pyramids of Egypt have stood as some of the most iconic structures on Earth — vast stone monuments rising from the desert, so precise and so grand that many have struggled to believe they were crafted by human hands alone. Among the more intriguing theories passed down through folklore and popular culture is the idea that “giants” built the pyramids. While modern archaeology offers a well-supported explanation, the myth of Egypt’s giants remains a captivating part of the country’s storytelling tradition.

Ancient Legends of the “Giants”

Long before scientific excavations, early Arab historians and travellers often described the builders of the pyramids as ’Aad, Thamud, or other ancient tribes of extraordinary size and strength. Some medieval accounts referred to them as beings who lived before the biblical Flood, possessed of immense height and supernatural abilities. These stories took root partly because the pyramids appeared far too sophisticated for ancient humans to construct without advanced machinery.

Over time, the image of “giants” became symbolic — a way for early societies to explain an achievement that seemed impossible.


Science and Archaeology Reveal the Truth

Modern evidence paints a very different picture. Far from being constructed by mythical giants, the pyramids were built by tens of thousands of skilled Egyptian workers, engineers, architects, stonecutters, and labourers — not slaves, but well-fed, well-housed, organised teams. Excavations at the Giza Plateau, including the discovery of workers’ villages and burial sites, show:

Workers rotated in three-month shifts

They were supplied with bread, beer, meat, and medical care

Many workers were honoured with tombs near the pyramids — a sign of respect for their service

Tools, copper chiselsramps, and engineering techniques have been uncovered around the sites

These findings prove that ancient Egyptians possessed advanced knowledge of mathematics, astronomy, logistics, and architecture thousands of years ahead of their time.

Why the Giant Theory Persists

Despite overwhelming archaeological evidence, the giant-builder theory persists for several cultural and psychological reasons:

Scale awe: The pyramids’ perfect alignment and colossal size trigger a sense of disbelief.

Ancient mystery appeal: People often prefer explanations that involve lost civilisations, giants, or extraterrestrial influence.

Gaps in historical knowledge: Early historians lacked the tools and scientific methods we have today, leading to colourful interpretations.

The True “Giants” of Egypt

In many ways, the real giants were the Egyptians themselves — not in physical stature, but in vision, innovation, and sheer determination. Their achievements in engineering and organisation were monumental. Each pyramid is a testament to human ingenuity, not mythical beings.

Legacy of a Monumental Achievement

The pyramids remain one of humanity’s greatest accomplishments. Whether viewed through the lens of archaeology or mythology, they continue to capture the imagination of the world. The legends of giants add a layer of cultural richness, while modern science unveils the extraordinary capabilities of ancient civilisation.

Egypt’s pyramids stand as a reminder that human beings, when unified under a shared purpose, can accomplish feats that seem almost supernatural — even giant.

Attached is a news article regarding the mysterious Egypt giant’s 

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/mystery-egypt-sarcophagus-found-not-to-house-alexander-the-greats-remains-idUSKBN1K92LQ/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Billy “Bull” Henderson: The Burger Kingpin Whose American Dream Unravelled Into a Nightmare

Billy “Bull” Henderson was a name that once evoked hunger, laughter, and the comforting smell of sizzling beef on a hot grill. A larger-than-life character from Oklahoma, Henderson became locally famous for running Bull’s Burgers, a late-night takeaway shop that grew from a tiny roadside shack into a beloved community staple. For years, customers described his burgers as “legendary,” his personality as “unforgettable,” and his work ethic as something out of an old-school American success story.

But behind the neon lights, the smoky grills, and the booming weekend queues, a nightmare was slowly unfolding—one that would ultimately shake the small community that adored him.

The Rise of Bull’s Burgers

Henderson opened his first shop in 2012 after leaving a job in construction. With just $6,000 in savings, a second-hand flat-top grill, and a recipe passed down from his father, he built a menu focused on one thing: massive, unapologetically greasy burgers. The kind that required two hands and a stack of napkins.

Within months, word spread. Truckers, students, night-shift workers, and families lined up daily. Social media embraced Bull’s booming voice, cowboy hat, and signature “double-bull smash.” By 2016, he had opened two more locations.

Outwardly, Billy Henderson was living his American dream.

The Cracks Behind the Counter

But the success hid a growing storm. Former employees later described Henderson as a hardworking but overwhelmed man—someone who slept three hours a night and ran the business almost entirely alone.

Financial troubles began to emerge. Expansion costs outweighed profits. Suppliers complained of delayed payments. Health inspectors reported minor violations that were quickly fixed but hinted at deeper problems.

Still, locals supported him. Henderson continued flipping burgers, determined to keep his dream alive.

The Night Everything Changed

The breaking point came on a humid July evening last summer.

A staff shortage had left Henderson running the shop nearly by himself. The queue stretched out the door. As tensions rose, a fryer malfunctioned, causing a small fire in the kitchen. Though quickly extinguished, it triggered a chain reaction of chaos.

Panicked customers fled. Emergency services arrived. Photos of the smoking storefront went viral within minutes. What many assumed was a minor incident soon revealed something far darker.

During the investigation, authorities discovered extensive financial records showing months of unpaid bills, mounting debts, and evidence that Henderson was struggling to keep the business afloat. Rumours circulated of burnout, mental strain, and the pressure of being the “face” of a community that expected him to be unstoppable.

The shop was forced to close temporarily, and Billy “Bull” Henderson quietly disappeared from the public eye.

A Community Shocked and Searching for Answers

For locals, the collapse of Bull’s Burgers felt like losing a piece of their identity. Supporters took to social media to defend him, insisting he simply worked himself too hard. Others pointed to systemic neglect of small business owners who receive little help despite being pillars of their communities.

Some described Henderson as a man crushed under the weight of his own success—a hardworking American who never learned to say no.

Where Is Billy Now?

Friends say Billy Henderson is currently “taking time to focus on his health” and deciding whether to rebuild his life or leave the burger world behind entirely. While Bull’s Burgers remains closed, homemade signs still hang on the door: “We love you, Billy.” “Come back soon.”

Whether he returns or not, his story serves as a cautionary tale of ambition, pressure, and the human cost behind the comfort food millions take for granted.

Billy “Bull” Henderson may have run a burger shop, but his story is much bigger—a reminder that even local heroes can face nightmares behind the scenes.

Attached is a news article regarding bill bull Henderson 

https://www.tiktok.com/@bd100story/video/7576757621076577558

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Meet Ironwood — Google’s TPU built for the “age of inference”

Google’s new seventh-generation Tensor Processing Unit, Ironwood, is a purpose-built AI accelerator designed not for brute-force model training but for the hard work of inference — running large, reasoning-capable models quickly, cheaply and at huge scale. It represents a big step in Google’s custom-silicon strategy and is already being deployed inside Google Cloud and Google’s own AI stack.  

What the chip actually is (the headline specs)

Architecture: TPU v7 (Ironwood) introduces a dual-chiplet design and advances in on-chip engines like an improved SparseCore to accelerate large-scale embedding and recommendation workloads.  

Performance & memory: One Ironwood chip delivers roughly 4,614 FP8 TFLOPS of peak compute and includes ~192 GB of HBM with memory bandwidth in the ~7.2–7.4 TB/s range.  

Massive scale: Ironwood pods can scale up to 9,216 chips, yielding on-paper performance measured in the tens of exaFLOPS (Google quotes ~42.5 exaFLOPS for the largest pods) and petabytes of pooled memory across the pod. Those scale factors let Google run extremely large inference workloads without moving data off the accelerator.  

Engineering highlights that matter

Ironwood was engineered to reduce data movement (a major energy and latency cost) and to handle models that mix dense compute with large sparse embeddings (Mixture-of-Experts, recommendation systems, and large LLMs). It includes a high-speed inter-chip interconnect (ICI) and reliability features such as on-chip root-of-trust and silent-data-corruption protection, plus advanced liquid cooling for efficiency. Google also used AI to help design parts of the chip.  

Where you’ll see its impact first

Because Ironwood is optimized for inference and low latency, the earliest and clearest benefits will show up in:

Real-time AI services — faster, cheaper responses for chatbots, multimodal assistants and live decision systems (e.g., search, translation, recommender systems).  

Agent-style AI and “thinking” models — models that must hold context across long horizons, consult large external memory, or orchestrate multiple smaller experts will run more efficiently.  

Large-scale multiuser cloud offerings — Google will expose Ironwood via Cloud instances and its AI Hypercomputer architecture, letting enterprises rent access to pod-level scale without building their own data centers.  

What this means for future technology (opportunities & risks)

Opportunities

More capable real-time AI: Lower latency and higher memory per accelerator allow richer, context-aware assistants, personalized agents, and live multimodal experiences (voice + vision + code) at consumer scale.  

New scientific and industrial use cases: Exascale inference and huge shared memory can accelerate drug discovery, climate modelling pipelines that incorporate learned components, and large graph / simulation tasks that benefit from fused memory+compute.  

Risks & tradeoffs

Centralization of compute: The scale and cost of Ironwood pods favors hyperscalers and large cloud customers; smaller orgs may still rely on rented access rather than owning similar hardware. That shifts competitive dynamics toward cloud providers.  

Energy & infrastructure demands: While Ironwood improves performance per watt vs prior generations, pods still consume megawatts and require advanced cooling and networking — so environmental and regional infrastructure costs remain significant.  

Bottom line

Ironwood isn’t just “a faster chip” — it’s a purpose-built platform element for an era in which AI systems do more of the interpretation, decision-making and continuous inference that powers apps in real time. For businesses and researchers, Ironwood opens new possibilities (and new dependencies): richer, lower-latency AI services at cloud scale — but primarily through the big clouds that can operate and afford pod-level hardware.  

Attached is a news article regarding ironwood chip developed by goggle 

https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-launches-new-ironwood-chip-speed-ai-applications-2025-04-09/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Huge Fire Engulfs Sydney Factory, Sending Plumes of Smoke Across City

A massive blaze tore through a factory complex in Sydney earlier today, triggering a large-scale emergency response and sending thick black smoke billowing across the city skyline. The incident, which began in the early hours of the morning, has been declared a major industrial fire as firefighters battle to bring the inferno under control.

According to Fire and Rescue NSW, the blaze erupted inside a manufacturing facility in Sydney’s western suburbs, quickly spreading through multiple sections of the building. Workers who were on-site at the time reported hearing a loud bang before flames began shooting through the roof.

Emergency services rushed to the scene, with more than 100 firefighters and dozens of fire appliances deployed to stop the blaze from spreading to neighbouring factories and storage units. Specialist hazardous materials crews were also called due to concerns about chemicals stored within the facility.

Residents across surrounding suburbs were advised to stay indoors and keep windows shut as a precaution, with smoke visible from kilometres away. Public health officials warned that debris and ash carried by the wind could pose respiratory risks, especially for vulnerable individuals.

Footage shared on social media showed towering flames engulfing the structure as firefighters fought the blaze from multiple directions, using aerial ladder platforms to douse hotspots and prevent the factory’s walls from collapsing outward.

Authorities confirmed that, despite the scale of the fire, all staff were safely evacuated. There have been no reports of serious injuries, although one firefighter was treated for heat exhaustion on site.

Police have cordoned off the area, and major roads around the industrial estate remain closed. The cause of the fire is not yet known, but investigators are expected to enter the site once it is deemed safe to do so.

Local business owners expressed shock at the speed of the fire’s spread. Many fear significant financial losses due to potential damage to adjacent properties and prolonged disruption to operations.

Fire crews are expected to continue dampening down hotspots well into the night, with authorities warning that smoke may linger over Sydney’s western districts for several hours.

More updates will follow as the investigation continues and the full extent of the damage becomes clear.

Attached is a news article regarding a huge fire in Sydney 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-30/inferno-fire-at-st-marys-generates-explosion-huge-fireball/106083492

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Prince William Visits Severely Ill Gaza Children — A Moment of Compassion in a Dark Time

Prince William, the Prince of Wales, has quietly visited a group of seriously ill children evacuated from Gaza — a gesture many are calling both compassionate and symbolically powerful. The visit took place in recent days, as dozens of young patients and their families receive specialist medical care in the UK under the auspices of the National Health Service (NHS).  

Background: Why These Children Are in the UK

In September 2025, the UK government began evacuating severely ill and injured children from Gaza — many unable to receive life-saving treatment because medical infrastructure in their home region has been devastated by ongoing conflict.  

By 21 November, around 50 children and their immediate family members had arrived in Britain for treatment.  

The evacuation and treatment are part of a broader humanitarian effort funded and coordinated by the UK government together with international partners.  

The Visit: What Happened

The royal visit was described by Kensington Palace as a “quiet” and private meeting, aimed at offering solace and comfort.  

William met with a small number of children and their families — young survivors of a conflict they should never have experienced — and spoke to them in what the Palace characterized as a deeply human moment.  

He also expressed profound gratitude to NHS staff caring for the children, acknowledging their “exceptional” compassion and professionalism in one of the most challenging humanitarian crises in recent times.  

The Significance: Beyond the Headlines

1. A human face to suffering

The visit puts a spotlight on the plight of Gaza’s youngest victims — children who have survived airstrikes, bombardments, displacement, and the collapse of medical services. In a media landscape saturated with political debate and conflict, encountering a royal figure showing empathy humanises these stories and offers a rare moment of dignity and acknowledgement for the victims.

2. A gesture of solidarity and public responsibility

By hosting these children in the UK, the government introduced a concrete form of humanitarian assistance. William’s visit underscores that this is not simply a matter of logistics or policy — but a moral commitment by a nation to care for innocent lives. His public gratitude to NHS workers also gives visibility to the often invisible efforts of medical and humanitarian personnel.

3. Historical resonance — and a message for the future

The Prince of Wales has previously visited Palestinian refugee camps (notably in 2018), demonstrating a longstanding concern with the Middle East humanitarian situation.   In today’s context, his return — this time to meet children receiving medical care in Britain — symbolises continuity of empathy and long-term engagement. 

What We Still Don’t Know — And What’s Next

For privacy and protection, the identities and precise locations of the children and their families have not been disclosed.  

It remains unclear how long each child will need to stay in the UK for treatment — some may require long-term care, while others may be able to return home if and when conditions permit.

The UK government has stated its commitment to continue offering medical evacuation and treatment, and to scale up humanitarian support as needed.  

Final Thought: Humanity in the Midst of Crisis

In a world too often defined by political posturing and division, the image of Prince William kneeling beside a young child — simply as one human being to another — is powerful. It serves as a reminder that beyond borders, alliances, and conflict, there remains a shared obligation to protect and care for the most vulnerable. For these families from Gaza, it will not undo their suffering. But in the darkest of times, it can bring a flicker of hope — a message that they are seen, they are not forgotten, and men and women of goodwill are trying to help.

Attached is a news article regarding Prince William visiting ill children from Gaza 

https://news.sky.com/story/prince-william-visits-severely-ill-children-evacuated-to-uk-from-gaza-13477372

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Australia Moves to Ban Social Media for Children Under 16 in Landmark Online Safety Push

Australia is set to introduce one of the world’s toughest online safety laws, announcing a plan to ban children under 16 from accessing social media platforms in a sweeping attempt to curb the growing mental-health crisis linked to online content.

Under the proposal—unveiled by the federal government after months of pressure from parents, teachers and safety advocates—major platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat and X would be legally required to block accounts belonging to users under the age of 16, with strict age-verification systems put in place.

A Response to Rising Concerns

The decision comes amid increasing evidence that social media is contributing to higher levels of depression, anxiety and addictive behaviour among children. Australian officials described the move as a necessary step to protect young people from harmful algorithms, cyberbullying, grooming and exposure to inappropriate content.

Prime Ministerial advisers said the government could “no longer wait for the tech giants to police themselves,” noting widespread failures in moderating harmful material and preventing underage sign-ups.

Mandatory Age Verification

Under the draft legislation, platforms will need to implement robust, government-approved age-verification technology, which may include ID checks or third-party verification services. Companies caught breaking the rules could face multi-million-dollar fines.

Parents will also gain new powers, including the ability to request the suspension of accounts believed to belong to children under the age limit.

Mixed Reactions Across the Country

The proposal has drawn strong support from parent groups and mental-health organisations, who argue that children are being exposed to dangerous online environments at increasingly young ages.

“It’s long overdue,” said one advocacy group. “We regulate alcohol, driving and gambling because they pose risks. Social media should be no different.”

However, critics have raised concerns about privacy, free expression, and the practicality of enforcing such a ban. Digital rights groups warn that mandatory age verification could lead to mass data collection and potential breaches, while some teenagers argue the ban will simply drive young people to use VPNs or fake IDs.

Tech companies have so far given cautious responses, with several suggesting they will work with the government but raising questions about implementation timelines and technological feasibility.

A Global Test Case

If passed, Australia would become one of the first Western nations to enforce a blanket ban on under-16s accessing social media—placing it at the forefront of a growing international debate.

Governments in the UK, France and parts of the United States have introduced or proposed similar age restrictions, but none have implemented a nationwide ban as sweeping as Australia’s.

What Happens Next

The bill is expected to be introduced into Parliament within months, with a phased rollout planned once passed. The government has signalled it is prepared for legal challenges but insists the policy will save lives and protect the country’s youth.

For now, Australia’s families and tech firms brace for a radical change to the digital landscape—one that could reshape how the next generation engages with the online world.

Attached News article regarding Australia banning social media for children

https://www.thetimes.com/world/australasia/article/australia-to-ban-children-from-social-media-wczjkfxr7?gclsrc=aw.ds&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=17515457033&adgroupid=&utm_medium=cpc&utm_content=&utm_term=&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21344063938&gbraid=0AAAAADiwoSDZWjCPQsm_4W0bP_Twb8r1-

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Background: the old tank deal

In the 1970s, under the rule of the Shah, Iran ordered a large fleet of British military hardware: more than 1,500 Chieftain tanks and around 250 armoured recovery vehicles, under a deal worth roughly £650 million, paid in advance.  

By the time of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, only 185 tanks had been delivered. The rest of the order was cancelled. Iran demanded a refund for the undelivered equipment.  

Over the ensuing decades, a protracted legal and diplomatic battle ensued. Arbitrators and courts eventually ruled that the UK owed Iran compensation — a sum often estimated at around £400 million (plus interest).  

Thus, the “tank deal” is not a hypothetical conspiracy — it is a real, documented arms-sale agreement that collapsed when geopolitical change overtook it, and which left the UK with a long-running debt to Iran.

What Boris Johnson has said (or admitted)

In a recent interview, Boris Johnson reportedly acknowledged that the UK has a legitimate case to repay Iran for this debt — thereby conceding that the UK was indeed “on the hook” over the cancelled 1970s tank sale.  

More concretely:

In 2021, while Foreign Secretary, Johnson told a parliamentary committee that it might be “worth considering” sending a plane with a “crate of cash” to Iran to repay the debt, if banking sanctions made conventional payment impossible.  

He acknowledged the moral and legal obligation, saying that — in an ideal world — the repayment could “snap of the fingers” be done. But he added that “there are complexities attached,” notably international sanctions on Iran.  

Thus, Johnson’s remarks make clear he and the UK government no longer deny responsibility — but that delivering on it has been complicated by geopolitical and legal constraints.


The “Conspiracy”: Why many believe this is more than just a debt

Although the “tank deal” itself dates from the 1970s, many observers see the continued failure to repay — coupled with the ongoing detention of dual British-Iranian nationals — as part of a deliberate diplomatic leverage strategy. Key points:

Among those detained by Iran was Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a British-Iranian woman arrested in 2016 and convicted on charges Iran says involve spying or propaganda. Her supporters (and some former UK officials) have argued she was being held, at least in part, as “bargaining chip” in order to pressure the UK over the unresolved tank-debt.  

Critics in the UK have accused the government of “double-dealing,” arguing that ministers repeatedly promised to repay the debt — even floated paying cash — but then balked because of sanctions or political pressure.  

Some see the long delay in repayment — decades after legal rulings — not as a mere bureaucratic hang-up, but as a strategic delay: by withholding payment, the UK retains a point of leverage, while publicly rejecting any formal link to detainees’ fate.  

In this view, the “conspiracy” is less about secret deals than about the conscious use of financial and diplomatic indebtedness — and human lives — as bargaining chips in geo-political negotiations.

Recent Resolution — and Continuing Questions

On 16 March 2022, the UK authorised payment of about £393.8 million to Iran — believed to settle the debt for the undelivered tanks. The payment was reportedly ring-fenced for humanitarian use, to comply with sanctions.  

On the same day, Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was released and returned to the UK. Many have interpreted the near-simultaneity of payment and release as confirmation that the long-standing debt indeed played a critical role.  

However — official British statements maintain that the debt payment and the release of detainees were “parallel issues,” not a transaction; and Iranian officials have varied in their narrative, meaning clarity is elusive.  

Thus — while a “resolution” was reached, the manner, timing, and opacity of the process continues to fuel suspicion and accusations of back-room diplomatic bargaining.

Why it matters — then and now

1. Legacy of arms trade duplicity: The tank-sale saga is emblematic of a darker history in which Western powers sold weapons to authoritarian or soon-to-be authoritarian states, then later retracted delivery — all while keeping the money. The 1970s-80s deals left deep scars of mistrust in the Middle East.

2. Diplomacy as hostage negotiation: The intersection of human rights (detained British-Iranian citizens), legal debt, and statecraft raises troubling questions about the ethics of using individuals as bargaining chips — even indirectly.

3. Sanctions & law vs. pragmatism: The UK’s difficulty in simply paying the debt because of sanctions illustrates the tangled web of modern geopolitics: legal obligations, moral responsibility, and international constraints often collide.

4. Precedent for future arms-related disputes: How this case was handled (with decades of litigation, stalling, and eventual payoff) sets a precedent for how Western governments might deal with other cancelled arms deals or historical obligations — and whether nations hold fast, or eventually cave.

Conclusion

The recent interview and admissions by Boris Johnson reopened old wounds — but also shone a spotlight on a decades-long saga of arms, money, and diplomacy. What began as a 1970s arms contract ended in revolution, non-delivery and decades of legal limbo. What followed became tangled in human suffering, with detainees caught in a web of international politics.

That the UK finally paid the debt — and that the payment coincided with the release of a detained British citizen — will not, for many critics, erase the sense of a cynical “deal.” Instead it reinforces the view that states often treat even human lives as negotiable assets in geopolitical bargaining.

Attached is a news article regarding boris Johnson interview on a old tank deal with Iran 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10618165/amp/Boris-Johnson-says-negotiations-Iran-free-Nazanin-Zaghari-Ratcliffe-going-right-wire.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Saturday, 29 November 2025

Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

U.S. Cuts Tariffs on Swiss Watches — What’s Changing

The United States Government and Switzerland have struck a new trade deal reducing U.S. import tariffs on Swiss goods — including luxury watches — from 39% down to 15%.  

The agreement, announced mid-November 2025, is part of a broader package in which Swiss companies pledged roughly US$200 billion of investment into the U.S. economy by 2028. 

According to Swiss officials, the new lower rates could take effect in “a few weeks,” though no firm date has yet been given.  

Why This Tariff Cut Matters

Sharp fall in Swiss watch exports after 39% tariff

In August 2025, U.S. authorities imposed a 39% tariff on most Swiss imports — including watches — the highest levy imposed on any Western ally in recent memory.  

As a result, in September 2025 Swiss watch exports to the U.S. plunged by around 56% compared with the previous year.  

Many brands rushed to ship inventories ahead of the tariff — a surge in July — but demand collapsed the following month once the tariff kicked in.  

Relief for watchmakers, retailers and consumers

For Swiss watchmakers — from premium houses to luxury brands — the tariff cut comes as a much-needed reprieve.  

U.S. retailers and customers should see more stable prices, or at least fewer sudden hikes, as the 15% rate is far more manageable than 39%. Analysts in the trade describe the move as “a major win” for the industry.  

The new rate also brings Swiss goods in line with tariffs applied to imports from many other European countries — reducing the competitive disadvantage Swiss products faced. 

A broader trade and investment deal

The tariff reduction is only one part of the agreement: Switzerland committed to invest heavily in the U.S. across sectors such as manufacturing, infrastructure and medical devices.  

The deal highlights how trade policy can be tied to foreign investment and broader economic cooperation.  

What Still Isn’t Clear

The exact date when the 15% tariff rate becomes operational in U.S. customs systems hasn’t been confirmed; officials say it may take “several weeks.”  

Some critics — particularly in Switzerland — have raised concerns about how the deal was negotiated, alleging undue influence by luxury-watch lobbyists and major industry players.  

While this reduces a major burden, 15% remains substantially higher than a zero-tariff regime, and Swiss exporters may still not be fully competitive against duty-free or low-tariff rivals.

What This Means for the Future — and Watch Buyers

Swiss watch brands currently operating in or exporting to the U.S. can breathe easier: price volatility is likely to ease. This could encourage shipments, restocking, and possibly lower retail prices over the next months.

For U.S. consumers and collectors previously spooked by high import costs, there may be new opportunities — especially if watchmakers and retailers pass the tariff savings on.

For the broader Swiss economy, this deal may signal a shift toward more stable, mutually beneficial trade relationships — particularly if planned investments materialise.

Attached is a news article regarding the US to reduce tariffs of Swiss watches 

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/details-swiss-us-trade-deal-could-emerge-friday-2025-11-14/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  PM Andrew Holness visits the Maroons in St Elizabeth — a moment of solidarity and a promise ...