Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Federal judge halts White House ballroom construction

A US federal judge has ordered an immediate halt to the construction of a controversial new ballroom at the White House, dealing a major setback to one of Donald Trump’s flagship renovation projects.

The ruling, issued by US District Judge Richard Leon, centres on a key constitutional question: whether a sitting president has the authority to significantly alter the White House without approval from Congress. In a strongly worded decision, Judge Leon concluded that such authority does not exist, stating that no law supports the president’s unilateral action.  

Why the project was stopped

The planned ballroom—reportedly costing around $400 million and spanning roughly 90,000 square feet—was intended to host large-scale events such as state dinners and official receptions.  

However, the project quickly became the subject of legal action. The National Trust for Historic Preservation filed a lawsuit arguing that the construction breached federal law and threatened the historical integrity of the White House, a building that is nearly 230 years old.  

Judge Leon agreed that the case was likely to succeed, ruling that construction must stop “unless and until Congress” formally authorises the project.  

Legal and political implications

The decision reinforces the principle that the White House is not the personal property of any president, but a national institution governed by law. Judge Leon emphasised that the president acts as a steward of the building, not its owner.  

Importantly, the ruling does not permanently cancel the ballroom. Instead, it places the project on hold until Congress decides whether to approve it. Lawmakers now have the option to pass legislation allowing construction to continue legally.  

The court has also allowed a 14-day window before enforcement takes full effect, giving the Trump administration time to appeal the decision.  

Trump’s response

President Trump reacted angrily to the ruling, defending the ballroom as a project funded by private donors and claiming it would not cost taxpayers anything. He also argued that previous White House renovations had not always required explicit congressional approval.  

Despite the legal setback, the administration has signalled its intention to challenge the decision in higher courts.

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

What happens next

The future of the ballroom now rests largely with Congress and the appeals process. If lawmakers grant approval, construction could resume. If not, the project may face permanent cancellation.

For now, the ruling represents a significant legal check on presidential power—and a reminder of the constitutional limits surrounding even the most ambitious White House projects.

Attached is a news article regarding the federal judge stops White House ballroom construction 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7056exw78xo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Sean Garner convicted over fatal XL Bully attack

A 31-year-old man has been convicted following a fatal dog attack that shocked a community and reignited debate around dangerous breeds in the UK.

Sean Garner, from Liverpool, was found guilty at Liverpool Crown Court of being the owner of a dog that was dangerously out of control causing injury, after his XL Bully fatally mauled an elderly man.  

The fatal attack

The victim, 84-year-old John McColl, was attacked in February 2025 in Warrington, Cheshire, after he walked onto the driveway of Garner’s home.  

The XL Bully, named Toretto, launched a sustained and brutal attack. Prosecutors told the court the dog “savaged” the pensioner and guarded him “as if he were its prey”, preventing members of the public from intervening.  

Despite attempts by bystanders to stop the attack using nearby objects, the dog continued mauling Mr McColl until armed police were forced to intervene. Officers ultimately shot the animal multiple times to bring the situation under control and allow emergency services to reach the victim.  

Mr McColl was taken to hospital with catastrophic injuries but tragically died around a month later.  

Disturbing details revealed in court

The trial heard deeply distressing evidence about the severity of the attack. A post-mortem examination of the dog revealed human remains in its stomach, underlining the extreme nature of the incident.  

Jurors were also told that the dog had effectively stood guard over the victim, preventing immediate medical assistance.  

Garner had previously admitted to possessing banned XL Bully-type dogs without the required exemption certificates, which are mandatory under UK law.  

Owner’s defence and actions

During the trial, Garner claimed he had taken precautions and insisted the dog had been secured before the incident. He said he was “devastated” and would not wish such an attack on anyone.  

However, prosecutors argued the dog was not adequately contained. Evidence suggested it was able to access the driveway area where the attack occurred.  

After the attack, Garner initially failed to return home when contacted by police and instead went on the run before later handing himself in, a detail that was also presented during proceedings.  

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

Wider context and public concern

The case comes amid growing concern over XL Bully dogs in the UK. The breed has been subject to strict regulations, including bans on breeding and requirements for registration, muzzling, and insurance.  

This tragic incident adds to a series of serious and fatal attacks involving powerful dog breeds, intensifying calls for tougher enforcement and responsible ownership.

Conclusion

Sean Garner’s conviction marks a significant moment in the ongoing national conversation about dangerous dogs.

For the family of John McColl, the verdict brings a measure of justice—but also serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences when powerful animals are not properly controlled.

Attached is a news article regarding Sean garner found guilty over fatal XL bully attack on pensioner 

https://news.sky.com/story/owner-of-xl-bully-that-savaged-84-year-old-man-found-guilty-13524972

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Rapper Ashley Warren Jailed After Fatal XL Bully Attack on Grandmother

An aspiring rapper described by some as a creative and driven individual has been jailed for more than a decade following a tragic dog attack that led to the death of a 68-year-old woman.

Ashley Warren, 41, was sentenced to 10 years and three months in prison after being found responsible for a fatal XL Bully attack on Esther Martin at his home in Jaywick, Essex. 

A Preventable Tragedy

The court heard that on 3 February 2024, Warren left Esther Martin alone in his home to look after two adult XL Bully dogs and eight puppies while he travelled to London to film a music video.  

Within hours, the situation turned deadly. Ms Martin, who had mobility issues and limited experience with dogs, was unable to control the powerful animals. She suffered multiple bite injuries and died at the scene.  

Emergency services initially struggled to enter the property due to the aggression of the dogs, with armed officers eventually forced to use tasers to gain control.  

Illegal Dogs and Ignored Warnings

The attack happened just days after new laws came into force banning XL Bully dogs in England and Wales without an exemption certificate. Prosecutors confirmed Warren did not have the required certification for the animals.  

Evidence presented in court showed the dogs were large, difficult to control, and living in poor conditions. Investigators concluded that Warren had failed to take even basic safety precautions.  

Court Verdict

Warren was convicted of owning a dog dangerously out of control causing death, along with a separate offence of possessing a knife in public.  

Prosecutors described the case as a “wholly avoidable tragedy,” stating that leaving a vulnerable person alone with such powerful animals created a dangerous and ultimately fatal situation.  

Remembering Esther Martin

Esther Martin has been remembered by her family as a devoted mother and grandmother whose life was cut short in horrific circumstances. Her death has had a lasting impact on the local community and has renewed concerns around dangerous dog ownership in the UK.  

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

A Complex Legacy

While Warren had been pursuing music and was known in local circles as an aspiring rapper, the case highlights how personal ambition and responsibility can collide with devastating consequences.

The tragedy serves as a stark reminder of the importance of responsible pet ownership, particularly with powerful breeds that require strict control, training, and legal compliance.

Attached is a news article regarding Ashley warren sentenced to 10 years over pit bull attack 

https://www.aol.com/articles/rapper-jailed-owning-xl-bully-123304865.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Doctors Claim Diet Could Hold the Key to Extreme Longevity — But Are 200 Years Really Possible?

Recent claims circulating online suggest that doctors believe former U.S. President Donald Trump could live to the extraordinary age of 200 — if he were to completely eliminate junk food from his diet. While the statement has captured attention for its boldness, medical experts say the reality is far more nuanced.

Trump, now in his late 70s, has long been associated with a diet that includes fast food favourites such as burgers, fried chicken and sugary drinks. Over the years, this has sparked public curiosity — and concern — about how such habits may impact long-term health.

Doctors widely agree on one point: reducing or eliminating junk food can significantly improve life expectancy. Diets high in processed foods, saturated fats, salt and sugar are linked to conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity — all major contributors to premature death. Switching to a balanced diet rich in vegetables, lean proteins, whole grains and healthy fats can dramatically reduce these risks.

However, the idea that any individual could reach 200 years old purely through dietary changes is, according to scientists, unrealistic with current medical knowledge. The longest verified human lifespan stands at 122 years, achieved by French woman Jeanne Calment. Most longevity researchers believe the natural human lifespan has a biological ceiling likely between 120 and 130 years.

That said, lifestyle choices — including diet, exercise, sleep, and stress management — can still play a powerful role in extending both lifespan and quality of life. Experts often point to so-called “Blue Zones,” regions of the world where people routinely live into their 90s and beyond, as evidence of how healthy habits can support longevity.

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

In Trump’s case, doctors have previously reported that he is in relatively stable health for his age, though they have also encouraged improvements in diet and exercise. Cutting down on junk food would almost certainly benefit his cardiovascular health and overall wellbeing.

Ultimately, while the claim of reaching 200 years old may be more fiction than fact, the underlying message carries weight: healthier living can add years to life — even if it doesn’t quite double it.

As medical science continues to advance, the dream of significantly extended human lifespans remains an area of active research. For now, though, experts agree that no diet alone can rewrite the fundamental limits of human biology.

Attached is a News article saying trump can love to 200 years old if he cut out junk food 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/donald-trump-says-could-live-000121263.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

BBC sacks Scott Mills over personal conduct allegations

The BBC has dismissed long-serving radio presenter Scott Mills following allegations relating to his personal conduct, bringing a sudden end to one of the most recognisable voices in British broadcasting.

Mills, 53, who had hosted the flagship Radio 2 Breakfast Show since January 2025, was taken off air abruptly last week before the corporation confirmed on Monday that he was no longer employed.  

In a brief statement, the BBC said: “While we do not comment on matters relating to individuals, we can confirm Scott Mills is no longer contracted and has left the BBC.”  

Allegations remain unclear

The broadcaster has not disclosed specific details about the allegations. However, multiple reports suggest they relate to a “historic relationship” dating back more than a decade.  

The lack of transparency has fuelled speculation and raised questions about the speed and severity of the decision. Unlike previous cases involving BBC talent, Mills was not publicly suspended pending investigation but instead removed from his role with immediate effect.  

Shock inside the BBC

The announcement has reportedly stunned colleagues and listeners alike. Mills had signed off his final show on 24 March saying he would be “back tomorrow,” only to be replaced the following day without explanation.  

An internal message from BBC management described the news as “sudden and unexpected,” acknowledging the impact on staff and audiences who had followed Mills’ career for decades.  

A long BBC career ends abruptly

Mills had been a fixture at the BBC since 1998, rising through the ranks from Radio 1 to become one of the corporation’s most prominent presenters.  

He was also among the BBC’s highest-paid personalities and had recently taken over one of the most UK radio stations , making his departure even more striking.  

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

Wider context: pressure on the BBC

The sacking comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the BBC’s handling of presenter conduct, following several high-profile controversies in recent years.  

With outgoing Director-General Tim Davie in his final days in the role, the decision is being seen by some analysts as part of a broader effort to reinforce accountability within the organisation.  

What happens next

The future of the Radio 2 Breakfast Show remains uncertain, with stand-in presenters currently filling the slot while the BBC considers a permanent replacement.  

As for Mills, neither he nor his representatives have publicly responded in detail to the allegations at the time of writing.

Conclusion

Scott Mills’ sudden dismissal marks a dramatic moment for both the presenter and the BBC. With limited information released and questions still unanswered, the story is likely to remain under intense scrutiny in the coming days as more details emerge.

Attached is a News article regarding BBC Scott mills sacked over allegations of personal conduct  

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckge1yn50y8o

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Wales Moves to Crack Down on Political Lies in Groundbreaking Reform

Wales is on course to become the first country in the world to introduce rules that could see politicians lose their jobs for deliberately lying—marking a dramatic shift in how political accountability is enforced.

The move follows growing concern over public trust in politics, with lawmakers in the Welsh Parliament (Senedd) backing measures designed to hold elected officials to higher standards of honesty. Under the new approach, politicians who are found to have knowingly misled the public could face serious consequences, including suspension, recall by voters, and ultimately removal from office.  

A “World-First” Approach to Truth in Politics

The proposals—described by supporters as “globally pioneering”—aim to go further than existing laws by directly targeting deliberate deception in political life. While UK law already makes it an offence for candidates to make false statements about opponents, the Welsh reforms seek to broaden this to cover misleading claims made to gain electoral advantage more generally.  

In March 2026, the Senedd voted to make lying during election campaigns illegal, with legislation expected to be fully implemented in the coming years.  

If enforced as planned, the rules would mean:

• Politicians must correct false statements publicly

• Persistent or serious breaches could lead to suspension

• In the most severe cases, voters could trigger a recall process to remove them from office

Why Wales Is Taking the Lead

The push for reform has been driven by concerns that misinformation and “post-truth politics” are eroding democracy. Advocates argue that politicians should be held to similar standards as professionals like lawyers or doctors, who face career-ending penalties for dishonesty.  

Supporters also believe the change reflects public frustration. Trust in politicians has declined sharply in recent years, and campaigners say stronger rules are needed to ensure voters can rely on what they are told during elections.

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

Challenges and Criticism

Despite broad support, the proposals are not without controversy. Critics argue that defining what counts as a “lie” in politics is complex and could risk limiting free speech or political debate. Others warn that enforcement may be difficult, particularly when distinguishing between opinion, exaggeration, and deliberate falsehood.

Lawmakers have attempted to address this by focusing on intentional deception, rather than honest mistakes or political interpretation.

A Model for Other Countries?

If successfully implemented, Wales could set a precedent for other democracies grappling with misinformation. Some experts believe similar laws could eventually be adopted across the UK—or even internationally—if the Welsh model proves effective.

Attached is a news article regarding government members lose there jobs for lying 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7v07je1119o

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Banks Must Embrace Crypto or Risk Losing Market Share

The global banking industry is approaching a critical turning point. As cryptocurrency and blockchain technology continue to reshape financial services, traditional banks face a clear choice: adapt to digital assets or risk losing relevance, customers, and ultimately market share.

For decades, banks have dominated payments, lending, and wealth management. But the rise of cryptocurrencies—particularly Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins—has introduced a parallel financial system that operates faster, cheaper, and often without intermediaries. This shift is no longer theoretical; it is already impacting how money moves across the world.

The Competitive Threat is Real

Fintech firms and digital-first banks are already capitalising on this transformation. Companies like Revolut have seen explosive growth, reporting record profits and tens of millions of users globally, as they expand into crypto and digital asset services.  

At the same time, stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to traditional currencies—are emerging as a serious competitor to bank deposits. Analysts estimate they could draw up to $1 trillion away from traditional banks in certain markets over the next few years.  

This represents a direct threat to one of banking’s core revenue sources: holding customer deposits.

Consumer Demand is Driving Change

Customer behaviour is shifting rapidly. Digital-native users increasingly expect instant payments, low fees, and global accessibility—features that crypto networks provide by design. In fact, more than 58% of digitally active consumers now prefer mobile wallet-based financial services, many of which integrate blockchain technology.  

In regions where banking systems are weak or currencies are unstable, crypto adoption is even stronger, filling gaps that traditional institutions have failed to address.  

If banks do not meet this demand, customers will simply move elsewhere.

Industry Momentum is Already Underway

The idea that crypto is a fringe concept is no longer accurate. A majority of banks are already moving in this direction:

• Over 60% of banks have launched crypto offerings or services for clients.  

• Blockchain is now being integrated into payments, compliance, and asset management systems.  

• Financial institutions are exploring crypto-related revenue streams such as custody, trading, lending, and staking.  

This demonstrates that crypto adoption is no longer optional—it is becoming a competitive necessity.

The Cost of Falling Behind

History shows that industries that fail to adapt to technological disruption rarely recover. Just as digital banking replaced many high street services, crypto and decentralised finance (DeFi) could redefine the next era of finance.

Banks that resist change face several risks:

• Loss of customers to fintech and crypto platforms

• Declining deposit bases due to stablecoins

• Reduced fee income as blockchain lowers transaction costs

• Erosion of global competitiveness

In contrast, banks that embrace crypto can unlock new revenue streams, improve efficiency, and strengthen their position in a digital-first economy.

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

A Hybrid Future for Finance

The most likely outcome is not the complete replacement of banks, but a hybrid system where traditional finance and digital assets coexist. Banks that integrate crypto—offering secure custody, regulated trading, and blockchain-powered payments—will be best positioned to thrive.

The message is clear: crypto is no longer a speculative trend, but a structural shift in finance. Banks that fail to act risk being left behind in a rapidly evolving financial landscape.

Attached is a news article that bank should adopt to the financial banking industry or face losing market share 

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/aug/04/high-street-banks-lose-100bn-deposits-uk-savers-shift-online-rivals

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Could Humans Live to 200? Scientists Explore ‘Whale Protein’ Longevity Breakthrough

The idea that humans could one day live to 200 years old has long belonged to science fiction. But recent scientific research into whales—some of the longest-living mammals on Earth—is beginning to challenge that assumption, offering intriguing clues about how extreme longevity might one day be possible.

Bowhead whales, in particular, have captured the attention of researchers. These Arctic giants are known to live for over 200 years, making them one of the longest-living mammals ever recorded. Scientists have been studying their biology to understand what allows them to age so slowly while avoiding many of the diseases that typically come with old age, such as cancer.

At the centre of this research is a group of proteins linked to DNA repair and cellular protection. In whales, certain versions of these proteins appear to be far more effective than those found in humans. They help maintain the integrity of DNA over time, reducing the accumulation of damage that leads to ageing and disease.

One key focus has been on proteins associated with tumour suppression and cell division. In humans, cells can become damaged and begin to divide uncontrollably, leading to cancer. However, whales seem to have evolved enhanced biological mechanisms that prevent this from happening, despite having far more cells in their bodies than humans—a mystery known as “Peto’s Paradox.”

Scientists believe that by studying these whale-specific proteins, it may be possible to develop treatments that mimic their effects in humans. This could involve gene therapy, advanced pharmaceuticals, or protein engineering designed to boost the body’s natural repair systems.

However, experts urge caution. While the research is promising, the idea that humans could soon live to 200 is still highly speculative. Ageing is a complex process influenced by genetics, environment, and lifestyle, and no single protein is likely to be a “magic solution.”

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

There are also ethical and societal questions to consider. If humans were able to dramatically extend lifespan, it could place enormous pressure on healthcare systems, pensions, and global resources. Questions about quality of life, inequality, and access to such treatments would also need to be addressed.

Despite these challenges, the study of whale biology represents a fascinating frontier in medical science. By unlocking the secrets of nature’s longest-living creatures, researchers hope to not only extend lifespan but also improve health in later years—allowing people to live longer, healthier, and more productive lives.

For now, living to 200 remains a distant possibility. But with each discovery, scientists are getting closer to understanding how the limits of human ageing might one day be pushed further than ever before.

Attached is a news article regarding humans being able to live a life to the age of 200 years old by using whale  protein 

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/oct/29/can-bowhead-whales-with-their-200-year-lifespan-help-us-to-slow-ageing

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Taps Tech Titans for Science Council — But Musk’s Absence Raises Eyebrows

In a move aimed at strengthening America’s technological edge, former President Donald Trump is reported to have assembled a high-profile science and technology advisory council featuring some of Silicon Valley’s most influential figures. Among those named are Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Nvidia chief Jensen Huang, and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison—each a heavyweight in fields ranging from artificial intelligence to data infrastructure.

The formation of such a council signals a renewed focus on innovation, particularly in areas like AI, semiconductor development, and digital communications. Huang’s leadership at Nvidia places him at the centre of the global AI boom, while Ellison’s long-standing role in enterprise software and cloud computing offers deep experience in data systems. Zuckerberg, meanwhile, brings insight into social platforms, virtual reality, and the evolving relationship between technology and society.

However, one notable omission has sparked widespread discussion: Elon Musk.

Musk, the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and X (formerly Twitter), is arguably one of the most prominent and controversial figures in modern technology. His ventures span electric vehicles, space exploration, artificial intelligence, and satellite communications—areas that closely align with the council’s apparent focus. His absence has therefore led to speculation about the reasoning behind the decision.

Several factors may explain why Musk was not included. One possibility is his increasingly independent and unpredictable public stance on political and technological issues. Musk has frequently clashed with both political parties and regulatory bodies, often voicing opinions that diverge sharply from mainstream policy directions. For a formal advisory council, consistency and alignment with broader governmental goals may be seen as essential.

Another consideration could be potential conflicts of interest. Musk’s companies operate in sectors heavily influenced by government contracts and regulation—particularly SpaceX, which works closely with NASA and the U.S. Department of Defense. Including him in a policy-shaping body could raise questions about impartiality.

There is also the matter of working style. Musk is known for his hands-on, high-intensity approach and tendency to operate outside traditional frameworks. By contrast, advisory councils typically function through structured collaboration and consensus-building—an environment that may not align with Musk’s leadership style.

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

Despite his exclusion, Musk’s influence on science and technology policy remains significant. His companies continue to shape industries critical to national interests, from renewable energy to space infrastructure. Whether formally involved or not, his voice is likely to remain part of the broader conversation.

The council’s final composition suggests a deliberate effort to balance innovation with stability—bringing together leaders who not only drive technological progress but also operate comfortably within institutional structures. Still, Musk’s absence serves as a reminder that influence in the tech world does not always translate into a seat at the policy table.

Attached is a news article regarding trump new science council team  

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00977-z

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Luxury Dubai Hotel Hit During Iran Strikes as War Escalates

A luxury five-star hotel in Dubai was caught up in the widening Iran conflict after being struck during a wave of missile and drone attacks targeting the Gulf region.

The Fairmont The Palm, located on Dubai’s iconic Palm Jumeirah, was hit on 28 February 2026 as Iran launched retaliatory strikes following US and Israeli military action.  

Witnesses reported explosions in the area before a fire broke out inside the beachfront resort, sending smoke billowing into the sky and prompting an urgent response from emergency services.

Fire and Injuries Reported

Officials confirmed that the strike caused a significant blaze at the hotel, with at least four people injured.  

Early reports suggest the damage may have been caused either by a direct missile strike or falling debris from intercepted projectiles, as UAE air defence systems attempted to neutralise incoming threats.  

Emergency crews were quickly deployed to the scene, and the fire was later brought under control.

Part of Wider Regional Attacks

The incident formed part of a much broader Iranian offensive that saw missiles and drones launched across multiple countries in the Middle East, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Israel.  

Dubai—long seen as one of the safest and most stable cities in the region—was shaken by the attack, with additional damage reported near key landmarks and infrastructure.  

Other locations in the UAE also experienced disruption, including temporary airport closures and civilian casualties caused by falling debris.  

Shock to a Global Tourism Hub

The Fairmont The Palm is one of Dubai’s best-known luxury resorts, featuring hundreds of rooms and a prime beachfront location.  

The attack has raised concerns about the vulnerability of high-profile tourist destinations as the conflict spreads beyond traditional war zones.

Analysts say the strike signals a dangerous escalation, with Gulf nations increasingly at risk of being drawn deeper into the conflict.

 

https://receive-us.solar-engine.com/receive/turl/gCqmM4a?attribution_type=ua&touchpoint_type=click&client_custom_params_1=d1bcfd24-1ef7-4f5a-ac16-05eebe1eda29

Rising Tensions

The UAE condemned the attacks, while Iran has stated its actions were in retaliation for earlier strikes on its territory. The situation remains volatile, with fears of further escalation across the region.

For residents and tourists in Dubai, the incident marked a stark reminder that even the world’s most luxurious and seemingly secure destinations are not immune to the effects of war.

Attached is a news regarding fairmount hotel in Dubai hit by an Iran missile 

https://news.sky.com/story/as-many-as-70-brits-detained-in-uae-over-iran-war-images-under-draconian-laws-13525806

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley