222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Wednesday, 29 January 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

In a significant legal development, Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has agreed to pay approximately $25 million to settle a lawsuit filed by former President Donald Trump. The lawsuit, initiated in 2021, accused Meta and its CEO of violating Trump’s rights by suspending his social media accounts following the January 6 Capitol riot.

The suspension of Trump’s accounts in January 2021 was a response to concerns that his posts could incite further violence after the Capitol incident. In June 2021, Meta imposed a two-year suspension on Trump’s accounts, citing the potential risk of further incitement.

In early 2023, Meta reinstated Trump’s accounts but implemented heightened suspension penalties for any future violations of its community standards. However, in July 2024, Meta announced the removal of these heightened penalties, stating that all U.S. presidential candidates would be subject to the same community standards as other users.

The recent settlement concludes the legal dispute between Trump and Meta, with the company agreeing to the $25 million payment. This agreement underscores the ongoing challenges and debates surrounding content moderation, free speech, and the role of social media platforms in regulating political discourse.

Here are the key points from the case of Donald Trump winning $25 million from Meta:

1. Lawsuit Settlement – Meta agreed to pay $25 million to settle a lawsuit filed by Donald Trump over the suspension of his social media accounts.

2. Account Suspensions – Meta suspended Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts in January 2021 following the Capitol riot, citing concerns over incitement to violence.

3. Two-Year Ban – In June 2021, Meta imposed a two-year suspension on Trump’s accounts, after which it reassessed the risks of allowing him back.

4. Reinstatement in 2023 – Trump’s accounts were reinstated in early 2023, but Meta imposed stricter penalties on him for potential future violations.

5. Restrictions Lifted in 2024 – In July 2024, Meta announced the removal of heightened penalties, ensuring Trump and all presidential candidates would be subject to the same content moderation rules as other users.

6. Legal and Political Impact – The settlement highlights ongoing debates about free speech, content moderation, and the power of social media companies over political discourse.

Conclusion

The $25 million settlement between Donald Trump and Meta marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over social media regulation, free speech, and corporate accountability. While Meta initially justified the suspension of Trump’s accounts as a necessary measure to prevent further violence, the decision faced strong opposition from conservatives who argued it was an act of political censorship.

The settlement not only closes this legal chapter but also underscores the challenges tech companies face in balancing platform policies with political neutrality. With the 2024 U.S. presidential election approaching, Meta’s decision to treat all candidates equally moving forward signals a shift in its approach to content moderation.

For Trump, the victory reinforces his long-standing claims of being unfairly targeted by big tech, bolstering his narrative ahead of his political comeback bid. Meanwhile, the case raises broader questions about the role of private companies in shaping public discourse and the potential need for clearer regulations governing digital platforms.

Attached is a news article regarding trumps 25 million for suspending his account from meta

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna189918

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

In a significant policy shift, President Donald Trump has announced plans to detain up to 30,000 undocumented migrants at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This move is part of a broader strategy to address illegal immigration and enhance national security.

The proposed initiative involves constructing a new facility within the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base to accommodate the influx of detainees. President Trump emphasized that this measure aims to alleviate the strain on domestic detention centers and expedite the processing of individuals awaiting deportation.

This announcement follows a series of executive actions targeting immigration. On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed multiple orders to tighten border security, including deploying U.S. troops to the southern border, ending birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, and reinstating the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed in U.S. courts.

The decision to utilize Guantanamo Bay has sparked considerable debate. Proponents argue that it provides a secure and efficient solution to manage the high number of undocumented migrants, thereby reducing the burden on U.S. facilities. Critics, however, express concerns over potential human rights violations and the legal implications of detaining individuals in an offshore military base.

Legal experts anticipate challenges to this policy, citing concerns over due process and the applicability of U.S. immigration laws in Guantanamo Bay. The administration’s aggressive stance on immigration is expected to face significant legal scrutiny as these policies are implemented.

As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how these measures will impact the broader immigration system and the individuals affected by these policies.

Here are the key points of Trump’s plan to detain 30,000 undocumented migrants at Guantanamo Bay:

• Mass Detention Plan: Trump announced a plan to house up to 30,000 undocumented migrants at Guantanamo Bay as part of a broader immigration crackdown.

• New Facility Construction: A new detention center will be built at the naval base to accommodate detainees.

• Border Security Measures: The move follows executive orders tightening immigration policies, including sending U.S. troops to the border and ending birthright citizenship.

• Supporters’ View: Proponents argue that this plan will ease the strain on U.S. detention centers and speed up deportation processes.

• Criticism and Legal Concerns: Critics raise concerns over potential human rights violations and legal issues related to detaining migrants in an offshore military base.

• Expected Legal Challenges: Legal experts anticipate lawsuits challenging the policy’s constitutionality and the due process rights of detainees.

Conclusion

Trump’s plan to detain 30,000 undocumented migrants at Guantanamo Bay marks a dramatic shift in U.S. immigration policy. While supporters argue it will relieve pressure on domestic detention centers and bolster border security, critics warn of human rights concerns and legal challenges. The move is likely to face intense scrutiny from civil rights organizations, legal experts, and international observers. As the administration moves forward with its immigration crackdown, the political and legal battles surrounding this policy will shape the broader debate on how the U.S. handles illegal immigration.

Attached is a news article regarding Trump sending 30,000 illegal immigration’s to Guantanamo bay

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yelgxk3rlo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Crisis in DR Congo: Rebel Group Captures Most of Goma

The volatile region of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) is grappling with another chapter of turmoil as the M23 rebel group has captured much of the city of Goma, located in the eastern part of the country. The situation has escalated significantly over the past few weeks, with heavy fighting erupting between the M23 rebels and the Congolese military forces. The capture of Goma, a major commercial and transport hub, has sent shockwaves through both local and international communities.

The M23 Rebel Group and Its Resurgence

The M23, named after a failed peace agreement signed on March 23, 2009, was initially formed as a rebel militia composed primarily of ethnic Tutsi soldiers. The group had previously launched violent attacks in the eastern part of DR Congo, citing grievances over the treatment of Tutsi communities and accusations of discrimination. Although the M23 was largely defeated and forced to retreat in 2013, it has resurfaced in recent months, claiming to fight for the protection of Tutsi communities in the region and accusing the Congolese government of failing to uphold peace agreements.

The Strategic Importance of Goma

Goma, located near the Rwandan border, is of immense strategic importance in the region. Its location makes it a critical entry point for trade and humanitarian aid. The city is also home to numerous international organizations, making it a symbol of both local and international efforts toward stabilizing the region. However, the capture of Goma by M23 forces has disrupted these efforts, creating a humanitarian crisis that has displaced thousands of civilians.

Humanitarian Impact and Displacement

As M23 forces advance, fighting has intensified in surrounding areas, forcing thousands of residents to flee their homes. According to the United Nations, more than 200,000 people have been displaced in the last few weeks alone, seeking refuge in makeshift camps or across the border in neighboring countries. Humanitarian organizations are struggling to provide aid to these displaced populations, and there are growing concerns about food and medical shortages.

International Response

The international community has condemned the violence and called for an immediate ceasefire. The United Nations and various humanitarian groups have expressed their concern for the safety of civilians in the region. Despite these appeals, the situation remains fragile, with no clear end in sight. Neighboring countries, particularly Rwanda, have been accused of providing support to the M23 group, a claim they deny. This has further complicated diplomatic relations in the Great Lakes region.

A Call for Dialogue and Peace

As the situation in Goma worsens, there is an urgent call for dialogue between the Congolese government and the rebel forces. Peace talks have been proposed, but they have yet to yield any meaningful results. The international community is now focusing on encouraging both sides to return to the negotiation table in the hopes of preventing further escalation and ensuring that the people of Goma and the wider region can begin to rebuild their lives.

The crisis in DR Congo is a stark reminder of the enduring challenges facing the country, including political instability, ethnic tensions, and the ongoing struggle to achieve peace and development. As the battle for Goma continues, the world watches closely, hoping for a resolution to a conflict that has lasted far too long.

Key Points:

1. M23 Rebel Group’s Resurgence: The M23, a rebel militia primarily made up of ethnic Tutsi soldiers, has captured much of Goma in DR Congo’s eastern region, escalating violence after a period of relative calm.

2. Strategic Importance of Goma: Goma is a vital commercial and transport hub near the Rwandan border, home to international organizations and crucial for trade and humanitarian aid.

3. Humanitarian Crisis: The fighting has displaced over 200,000 people, creating urgent needs for food, shelter, and medical assistance for civilians affected by the violence.

4. International Response: The international community, including the UN and humanitarian groups, has condemned the violence and called for a ceasefire, with some accusing Rwanda of supporting M23, further complicating regional diplomacy.

5. Call for Peace Talks: There is growing pressure for dialogue between the Congolese government and the M23 rebels to prevent further escalation and work towards a sustainable peace agreement.

The ongoing conflict in DR Congo, with the M23 rebel group capturing much of Goma, highlights the fragile peace and persistent instability in the region. As thousands of civilians are displaced and humanitarian conditions worsen, the need for a peaceful resolution has never been more urgent. While international condemnation and calls for dialogue grow, the path to lasting peace remains unclear. For the people of Goma and the broader eastern DR Congo, the hope lies in renewed negotiations and a concerted global effort to address the underlying causes of the conflict. Until then, the region faces continued suffering and uncertainty.

Attached is a News article regarding the DR Congo rebels captured in goma

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cyv4606y4jzo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

On January 27, 2025, King Charles III made a historic visit to Auschwitz-Birkenau, becoming the first British monarch to do so. This visit marked the 80th anniversary of the camp’s liberation and underscored the importance of remembering the atrocities committed during the Holocaust.

During his time at the former Nazi concentration camp in Poland, King Charles walked through the infamous gates bearing the inscription “Arbeit Macht Frei” (“Work sets you free”) and toured the site, witnessing firsthand the remnants of the horrors that took place there. He met with survivors, listened to their harrowing stories, and laid a wreath at the “Death Wall,” where many prisoners were executed.

In his remarks, the King emphasized the significance of remembering such atrocities to prevent them from happening again, especially in a time when antisemitism and other forms of hatred are on the rise globally. He described the visit as both a “somber and sacred moment,” reflecting on the profound impact of witnessing the site and hearing survivor testimonies.

The visit was deeply personal for King Charles, who has long been an advocate for Holocaust education and remembrance. Prior to this visit, he hosted a reception at Buckingham Palace to mark Holocaust Memorial Day, where he met with survivors and highlighted the importance of educating future generations about the Holocaust.

Simultaneously, other members of the royal family participated in commemorations. Prince William and Princess Kate attended a memorial service in London, where they met with survivors and reiterated the importance of challenging prejudice and hatred in all forms.

King Charles’s visit to Auschwitz serves as a poignant reminder of the horrors of the past and the ongoing responsibility to remember and educate, ensuring that such atrocities are never repeated.

Here are the key points from King Charles III’s visit to Auschwitz:

1. Historic Visit: King Charles became the first British monarch to visit Auschwitz on the 80th anniversary of the camp’s liberation.

2. Holocaust Remembrance: The visit was a significant moment for reflecting on the horrors of the Holocaust and emphasizing the importance of memory to prevent future atrocities.

3. Tour of Auschwitz: The King toured the camp, visiting the infamous “Arbeit Macht Frei” gates and the “Death Wall,” where many prisoners were executed.

4. Meeting Survivors: He met with Holocaust survivors, listened to their stories, and laid a wreath to honor those who perished.

5. Statements of Remembrance: King Charles called for the continued education of future generations about the Holocaust and the dangers of rising antisemitism and hatred.

6. Royal Support for Education: This visit reflected the King’s long-standing commitment to Holocaust education and remembrance.

7. Other Royal Involvements: Prince William and Princess Kate also participated in Holocaust Memorial Day events, highlighting the ongoing importance of combating prejudice.

The visit underscored the royal family’s commitment to ensuring that the lessons of the Holocaust are passed on to future generations.

Iconclusion, King Charles III’s visit to Auschwitz was a poignant and historic moment that highlighted the importance of Holocaust remembrance and education. As the first British monarch to visit the site, his actions reinforced the global responsibility to honor the memory of those who suffered and perished in the Holocaust. By meeting survivors and reflecting on the atrocities of the past, King Charles not only paid tribute to the victims but also called for continued vigilance against hatred and antisemitism. This visit serves as a powerful reminder of the need to educate future generations, ensuring that the horrors of the past are never repeated.

Attached is a news article regarding Auschwitz 80th anniversary

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5yep0l5545t

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Princess Beatrice and her husband, Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi, are overjoyed to announce the birth of their daughter, Athena Elizabeth Rose. Born several weeks prematurely, Athena arrived weighing 4 pounds 5 ounces. Despite her early arrival, both mother and daughter are reported to be healthy and settling in well at home.

Athena is the couple’s second child, joining their first daughter, Sienna Elizabeth, born in September 2021. Princess Beatrice is also a stepmother to Edoardo’s son, Christopher Woolf, from a previous relationship.

The name Athena Elizabeth Rose pays tribute to her great-grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, reflecting the family’s deep respect and affection for the late monarch.

The royal family has expressed their delight at Athena’s safe arrival. King Charles conveyed his joy, stating that both families are thrilled with the news.

Princess Beatrice and Edoardo have been married since July 2020. Their growing family continues to capture the public’s affection, and well-wishes have poured in from around the world celebrating the birth of their “tiny and absolutely perfect” baby girl.

Here are the key points regarding Princess Beatrice’s new baby:

• Birth Announcement: Princess Beatrice and her husband, Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi, welcomed a baby girl, Athena Elizabeth Rose.

• Premature Arrival: Athena was born several weeks early, weighing 4 pounds 5 ounces.

• Mother and Baby’s Health: Both Beatrice and Athena are healthy and settling in well.

• Name Significance: Athena’s middle names honor Queen Elizabeth II.

• Family Reaction: The royal family, including King Charles, expressed their joy.

• Beatrice’s Growing Family: Athena is Beatrice’s second child after Sienna Elizabeth (born in 2021), and she is also stepmother to Edoardo’s son, Christopher Woolf.

• Marriage & Public Interest: Beatrice and Edoardo married in 2020, and their growing family continues to attract public affection.

Princess Beatrice and Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi’s joyous announcement of their daughter Athena Elizabeth Rose’s birth has been met with widespread excitement and well-wishes. Despite her early arrival, Athena is reported to be healthy, and her name carries a heartfelt tribute to Queen Elizabeth II. With their growing family, Beatrice and Edoardo continue to capture public affection, and the royal family has warmly embraced the newest addition. As they settle into life with their “tiny and absolutely perfect” baby girl, the couple looks forward to cherishing these precious early moments with their expanding family.

Attached is a news article regarding the the birth of princess Beatrice baby girl.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y74gpzle0o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

On January 29, 2025, a tragic crowd crush at the Kumbh Mela festival in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India, resulted in the deaths of at least 38 individuals, with fears that the toll may rise. The incident occurred early in the morning as millions of pilgrims gathered at the confluence of the Ganges, Yamuna, and the mythical Saraswati rivers for a ritual bath, considered one of the holiest acts in Hinduism.

Witnesses described chaotic scenes as the massive crowd surged towards the riverbanks. Security personnel struggled to manage the overwhelming numbers, leading to multiple stampedes. Some attendees fell and were trampled in the rush. Authorities had advised pilgrims to limit their time in the water to prevent overcrowding, but the sheer volume of participants made crowd control challenging.

The Kumbh Mela, held every 12 years, is one of Hinduism’s most significant events. This year’s festival, known as the Maha Kumbh Mela, is particularly auspicious, occurring once every 144 years. Over its 45-day duration, the event was expected to attract around 400 million pilgrims.

In response to the tragedy, Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for immediate measures to assist the affected and emphasized the need for enhanced safety protocols. Religious leaders have urged pilgrims to avoid the main bathing site and seek alternative locations to prevent further incidents.

This incident is a somber reminder of past tragedies at the Kumbh Mela. In 1954, a stampede resulted in around 800 deaths, and in 2013, another stampede at the festival led to 36 fatalities.

As the festival continues until February 26, authorities are under pressure to implement stricter crowd management strategies to ensure the safety of the remaining pilgrims. Families are still searching for missing loved ones amidst the aftermath of the disaster.

Key Points: Kumbh Mela Crowd Crush Tragedy

• Incident & Casualties: At least 38 people dead, with fears the toll may rise, after a crowd crush at the Kumbh Mela in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh.

• Cause: Massive surge of pilgrims towards the riverbanks for a ritual bath led to stampedes and trampling.

• Festival Significance: The Maha Kumbh Mela, held once every 144 years, attracts millions of Hindu devotees.

• Scale: Over 400 million pilgrims expected throughout the festival, making crowd control a challenge.

• Government Response: Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ordered immediate assistance and emphasized better safety measures.

• Historical Context: Similar tragedies occurred in 1954 (800 dead) and 2013 (36 dead).

• Ongoing Risk: The festival continues until February 26, raising concerns about further incidents.

• Public Advisory: Authorities and religious leaders urge pilgrims to use alternative bathing sites to avoid overcrowding.

Conclusion

The tragic crowd crush at the Kumbh Mela highlights the immense challenges of managing one of the world’s largest religious gatherings. Despite prior safety measures, the sheer volume of pilgrims proved overwhelming, resulting in dozens of deaths and raising serious concerns about crowd control. As authorities work to assist victims and implement stricter regulations, this disaster serves as a sobering reminder of past tragedies at the festival. With millions still expected to attend in the coming weeks, ensuring the safety of pilgrims remains a critical priority. Moving forward, better infrastructure, real-time monitoring, and improved crowd management strategies will be essential to prevent similar disasters in future gatherings.

Attached is a news article regarding fatal India crowd crush

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3rwjnr12lwo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

As of the latest available data, Denmark boasts the lowest child poverty rate among OECD countries, with only 9.9% of children living in poverty. Similarly, Finland and Slovenia have commendable rates, with about 10% of their child populations experiencing poverty. In contrast, countries like the United States face higher child poverty rates, with more than one in four children affected.

Globally, significant strides have been made in reducing child poverty. Between 2013 and 2022, the extreme child poverty rate decreased from 20.7% to 15.9%, lifting approximately 49.2 million children out of extreme poverty. However, this progress was about 30 million less than projected, primarily due to disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic.

It’s important to note that national wealth doesn’t always correlate with low child poverty rates. For instance, despite having similar per capita national incomes, the United States has a child poverty rate of 26.2%, more than double Denmark’s rate.

Looking ahead to 2029, projections indicate potential challenges. In the UK, for example, relative poverty is set to rise for children and working-age adults, with an estimated 100,000 more children living in poverty by October 2029 compared to October 2024.

To effectively combat child poverty, especially in affluent nations, it’s crucial to implement comprehensive social policies. Investments in social security, equitable access to quality education, nutrition, health services, and robust social protection systems are essential. Without such measures, even wealthy countries may struggle to reduce child poverty rates in the coming years.

Key Points on the Lowest Child Poverty Rates (2029 Projections & Trends)

1. Denmark Has the Lowest Child Poverty Rate

• Denmark has the lowest child poverty rate among OECD countries (9.9%).

• Finland and Slovenia also have low rates (~10%).

2. Global Reduction in Child Poverty

• Extreme child poverty declined from 20.7% in 2013 to 15.9% in 2022.

• About 49.2 million children were lifted out of extreme poverty.

• Progress was slower than expected due to global disruptions like COVID-19.

3. Disparity Among Wealthy Nations

• National wealth does not always correlate with low child poverty.

• The U.S. has a 26.2% child poverty rate—more than double Denmark’s rate—despite a similar per capita income.

4. Projected Increase in Child Poverty by 2029 (UK Case Study)

• UK child poverty is expected to rise, with 100,000 more children in poverty by 2029.

• Economic and policy factors, including benefit caps, contribute to this increase.

5. Strategies to Reduce Child Poverty

• Effective social policies include investment in social security, quality education, healthcare, and nutrition.

• Robust social protection systems are crucial to maintaining low child poverty rates.

Conclusion

While some nations, such as Denmark, Finland, and Slovenia, have achieved remarkably low child poverty rates, the global picture remains uneven. Progress has been made in reducing extreme child poverty, but challenges such as economic instability, policy decisions, and global crises have slowed improvements. The disparity between wealthy nations highlights the crucial role of social policies rather than just economic strength in tackling child poverty.

Looking ahead to 2029, projections suggest that some countries, like the UK, may see rising child poverty levels due to inadequate policy responses. To prevent setbacks and ensure long-term reductions in child poverty, governments must prioritize investments in social security, education, healthcare, and robust social protection systems. Without these measures, even economically strong nations may struggle to safeguard the well-being of their most vulnerable children.

Attached is a news article regarding child poverty in Scotland by 2029

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jan/29/child-poverty-predicted-to-rise-in-most-of-uk-except-scotland

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley