222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Monday, 18 August 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Life Without Parole in the UK: The 20 Most Dangerous Prisoners

In the UK, the most severe form of punishment for the gravest crimes is the whole-life order—a life sentence with no possibility of release. As of March 2025, around 70 individuals are serving such sentences in England and Wales.

Here are 20 of the most infamous individuals holding this grim distinction:

1. Lucy Letby

A former neonatal nurse, convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to kill six others. She received a whole-life order in 2023, becoming one of only a few women ever to receive this sentence.

2. Rose West

Convicted in 1995 for the serial murders of ten women, including her own daughter. A whole-life order was imposed by a Home Secretary in 1997, making her one of the longest-serving inmates with this sentence.

3. Levi Bellfield

Responsible for multiple murders including that of schoolgirl Milly Dowler, he is now the only convicted criminal in UK history serving two whole-life orders.

4. Wayne Couzens

A former police officer whose heinous murder of Sarah Everard in 2021 was deemed so egregious that he received a whole-life order, even though it was a single murder of an adult. His appeal was rejected in 2022.

5. Thomas Mair

The neo-Nazi who murdered MP Jo Cox in 2016 was given a whole-life sentence due to the political and ideological nature of his crime.

6. Stephen Port

Known as the “Grindr Killer,” he murdered four young men and raped several others. He was handed a whole-life order in 2016.

7. Mark Bridger

Convicted in 2013 for the abduction and murder of five-year-old April Jones, his sentence was a whole-life order and he withdrew his appeal the following year.

8. Dennis Nilsen

A serial killer who murdered and dismembered numerous young men in North London during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Successive Home Secretaries ruled that he should never be released.,

9. Ian Brady & Myra Hindley

Infamous as the “Moors Murderers,” they killed multiple children in the 1960s. Hindley was the first woman to receive a whole-life tariff in 1990.

10. Robert Maudsley

Nickname “Hannibal the Cannibal,” he murdered fellow inmates inside prison and is considered one of the most dangerous, spending decades in solitary confinement.

11. John Childs

A hitman responsible for six contract killings; he confessed to more while incarcerated. Received a whole-life order and is still imprisoned.

12. Anthony Entwistle

Convicted of raping and murdering a teenager just days after release from a prior rape sentence—he was given a whole-life order.

13. Victor Miller

A prolific sex offender, he requested and received a whole-life order after murdering a 14-year-old boy in 1988.

14. John Duffy

Known as the “Railway Killer,” he raped and murdered multiple women in the late 1980s. Originally had a minimum term, but later received a whole-life tariff.

15. Anthony Arkwright

At just 21, he went on a brutal, short-lived killing spree in 1988. He remains the youngest ever to receive a whole-life order.

16. Peter Moore

Known as “The Man in Black,” he murdered four men and sexually assaulted dozens over two decades. His whole-life order survived legal challenges.

17. Ryan Matthews

Given a whole-life order in 2015 after murdering a healthcare assistant at a psychiatric hospital.

18. David Mitchell

Killed Robert Hind while on licence from a previous life sentence, including dismemberment—received a whole-life order in 2015.

19. Jason Gomez (and Paul Wadkin)

While serving a life sentence, Gomez invited a fellow inmate into his cell and stabbed him nearly 190 times. He was given a whole-life tariff in 2015.

20. Ian Birley

On parole after 18 years for a previous murder, he brutally stabbed another man 69 times—received a whole-life sentence.

Context and Implications

Whole-life orders are reserved for crimes of exceptional severity—cases often involving extreme violence, multiple victims, abuse of position (e.g., Wayne Couzens), ideological motives, or particularly depraved behavior. Judges or Home Secretaries may impose them under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, with judicial imposition being more common since then.

Ethical and legal debates continue, particularly around their human rights implications. The European Court of Human Rights once viewed irreducible whole-life sentences as potentially inhuman, but UK courts have ultimately upheld their legality.

Attached is a news article regarding Britain deadliest prisoners

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clynxgr464eo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

London’s Largest Cannabis Shipment**: The Case Involving Yeboah and Bonsu

Overview

In what has been dubbed one of London’s biggest cannabis smuggling operations, four men—including Daniel Yeboah and Kwaku Bonsu—were convicted for importing approximately 1.5 tonnes of cannabis, concealed within sacks of gari powder, from Ghana to the UK. The operation, foiled by the National Crime Agency (NCA) at Tilbury Docks, would have had a devastating impact, with an estimated street value of £4.3 million.

The Smuggling Scheme

• Container Arrival and Concealment

The shipment arrived at Tilbury Docks on 19 December 2019. Hidden inside 2,335 packages of herbal cannabis, the contraband was obscured within white hessian sacks of gari powder—a staple flour made from cassava roots.

• Interception and Sting

Intelligence shared between the NCA and the Ghanaian Narcotics Control Commission led to the interception. Authorities replaced the cannabis with dummy packages, allowing the container to continue its journey—and thus set up a controlled delivery.

• Delivery and Arrest

On 13 January 2020, the container made its way to an industrial yard in north London under surveillance. Here, Yeboah signed the delivery note using a false identity, and the container’s seal was cut with an angle grinder. Bonsu was observed photographing the container, while Adjei dropped off Baidoo. Upon discovering the drugs were missing, all four fled the scene—but were swiftly arrested later that day.

• Evidence of Organised Operation

At Baidoo’s address, authorities discovered a 10-tonne hydraulic press typically used for compressing drugs, along with phones and dashcam footage. Notably, calls intercepted via Adjei’s dashcam included: “my brother, be a little watchful. It is all a little dodgy.” Yeboah, too, was recorded saying: “I don’t think the food [drugs] is in it” and “there was gari inside… the people are thieves.”

• Sentencing

On 18 October 2024, at Southwark Crown Court:

• Daniel Yeboah was sentenced to 5 years.

• Edward Adjei received 4 years.

• Kristoffen Baidoo, tried in absentia, received 10 years.

• Kwaku Bonsu, also absent, was sentenced to 7 years. Both Baidoo and Bonsu remain at large.

The combined sentence totalled 26 years, emphasizing the gravity of the operation.

Significance & Context

The NCA characterized the case as a major blow to organised criminal networks targeting the UK, especially those facilitating “county lines” drug distribution. Had the shipment entered street-level supply, it could have fueled violence, exploitation, and further criminality across communities.

Attached is a news article regarding the biggest cannabis bust in London from Africa

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq821qv3ek0o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Tommy Robinson Comments on Ian Wright, Ethnicity, and Zionism Stir Debate

Far-right activist Tommy Robinson has once again sparked controversy after making comments involving former England footballer Ian Wright, ethnicity, and what he described as “Zionist influence.” His remarks, shared online, have drawn widespread criticism for fuelling division and promoting conspiratorial narratives.

Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, claimed in his recent broadcast that Wright’s position as a respected voice in football punditry is tied not only to his sporting legacy but also to what Robinson framed as “ethno-political agendas.” Without providing evidence, he suggested that Wright’s prominence in the media is part of a broader system shaped by what he termed “Zionist power structures.”

These comments quickly drew attention due to Robinson’s long history of provocative statements on race, religion, and immigration. Critics argue that framing Wright—who has been an outspoken advocate against racism in football—in such terms is an attempt to delegitimise his voice by tying it to conspiracy theories about ethnic and religious groups.

Community leaders and anti-racism campaigners were swift to respond. A spokesperson for Kick It Out, the football equality charity, condemned Robinson’s remarks, saying:

“Attempts to discredit Ian Wright by using coded language around ethnicity and Zionism are not only offensive but dangerous. Wright has dedicated his platform to challenging discrimination in sport, and smears like these only feed hate.”

Robinson’s framing also drew scrutiny for blurring lines between anti-Zionist rhetoric and antisemitic tropes. By invoking “Zionist influence” in connection with Wright’s career, observers say he is reviving conspiratorial narratives about media control and ethnicity, themes that have historically been used to incite hostility.

Ian Wright himself has not directly responded to Robinson’s comments. However, the Arsenal legend has frequently spoken out against racist abuse directed at players and pundits, highlighting the need for accountability in media and online spaces.

Robinson, who has previously faced bans from social media platforms, continues to court controversy through his videos and public appearances. While his core supporters see his statements as “truth-telling,” critics argue that his rhetoric risks normalising racism and antisemitism in public debate.

Broader Impact

The controversy highlights the recurring tensions between free speech and hate speech in the UK. With football pundits like Wright increasingly at the forefront of anti-racism campaigns, Robinson’s attempt to target him underscores how sports figures have become symbolic battlegrounds in wider cultural disputes.

Conclusion

Tommy Robinson’s latest comments linking Ian Wright to ethnicity and Zionism illustrate how public figures are often co-opted into broader ideological narratives. While his supporters applaud him for speaking “openly,” his critics warn that his words reinforce dangerous stereotypes and conspiracies. The incident is yet another reminder of how football, politics, and identity remain deeply intertwined in Britain’s ongoing debates over race and representation.

Tommy Robinson and His Embrace of Zionism

Tommy Robinson, the far-right activist best known for founding the English Defence League (EDL), has long positioned himself as a defender of what he calls “Western values.” In recent years, however, Robinson has drawn attention for his open embrace of Zionism and his alignment with pro-Israel positions — a stance that has surprised some observers given his controversial record on race and religion.

Public Identification with Zionism

Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has repeatedly described himself as a Zionist. During rallies and interviews, he has argued that Israel represents a “front line” in the global struggle against Islamist extremism. He has often used Israel as an example of what he calls a “strong nation defending its borders,” positioning it as a model for Britain and Europe.

His public statements, particularly during his time leading the EDL, frequently featured Israeli flags at marches, while Robinson insisted that his movement was “not anti-Jewish” but rather allied with Israel against what he described as “Islamist threats.” This has cemented his reputation in some circles as a staunch supporter of Zionism, even as his broader anti-immigration rhetoric has been criticised as divisive and racist.

Support and Criticism

Robinson’s identification as a Zionist has won him backing from some pro-Israel activists who view his stance as a rare expression of solidarity from within the far right. However, it has also drawn suspicion and hostility, with critics accusing him of using Zionism opportunistically to shield himself from accusations of antisemitism while continuing to spread inflammatory rhetoric against Muslims.

Anti-racism campaigners note that Robinson’s framing of Zionism is often instrumental, deployed in the context of his opposition to Islam rather than from a genuine concern for Jewish self-determination. His critics argue that by reducing Zionism to a symbol in his culture-war politics, Robinson risks fuelling tensions between communities rather than fostering understanding.

Broader Context

Robinson’s embrace of Zionism also reflects a broader trend among some European far-right figures, who have repositioned themselves as allies of Israel in opposition to Muslim immigration. This strategic alignment, while controversial, has allowed figures like Robinson to claim common cause with Jewish communities, even as their wider rhetoric has been condemned for promoting hate and division.

Conclusion

Tommy Robinson’s claim to be a Zionist highlights the complicated and sometimes contradictory alliances in today’s political landscape. For some, his support for Israel is seen as solidarity; for others, it is an opportunistic tactic rooted in his longstanding hostility toward Muslims. What remains clear is that Robinson’s embrace of Zionism is less about nuanced political ideology and more about weaponising identity in Britain’s ongoing debates about culture, religion, and belonging.

Attached is a news article regarding Tommy Robinson comment on Ian wright and the ethno nationalist and the Zionist connection he has made

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/independent-review-political-violence-and-disruption/outcome/protecting-our-democracy-from-coercion-accessible--4

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Joel Hansen’s Monumental “Fish & Chips x10” Challenge Showdown

The realm of competitive eating is no stranger to jaw-dropping feats, but few creators deliver theatrics and sheer volume quite like Joel Hansen. One of his most talked-about spectacles? The “10 battered fish with chips on two plates” extravaganza—a live-streamed challenge that tests both endurance and fork speed.

A Feast Fit for (a Very Hungry) King

In this video, Joel tackles an enormous portion: two plates brimming with ten battered fish fillets and mountains of thick-cut chips. The sheer enormity sets the stage for an electrifying showdown—not just with food, but with time, appetite, and showmanship.

Viewers are instantly drawn into the high-stakes drama: Will he finish it within a set time limit? Will he push past his usual limits? Or will fatigue—and an ever-ticking clock—force a halt.

The Joel Hansen Formula

From general patterns seen across his fish & chips series, Joel’s approach tends to follow a familiar arc:

• Epic scale: Whether it’s the “14 lb Fish & Chips Challenge” dubbed “unbeatable” trips to Canadian “biggest fish supper” confrontations, or themed regional showdowns like in Texas, Joel consistently ups the ante.

• Impressive appetite: His ability to demolish massive platters is well-documented—even when he’s “undefeated”

• Dramatic delivery: Every crunch, every bite, every sweat bead is captured for maximum tension and viewer engagement.

This “10 battered fish on two plates” challenge fits naturally into that saga—raising eyebrows, forks, and stakes in real-time entertainment.

Live vs Video: What’s Different

• Live feed intensity: Watching him take on this gargantuan portion live means real-time reactions—both from Joel and the audience. Viewers might cheer, gasp, or count down alongside him, fueling the adrenaline.

• Video edit polish: In post-produced uploads, dramatic pauses, close-ups of golden batter, and montage sequences add cinematic flair and pacing, heightening suspense around whether he’ll succeed—or spectacularly fail.

Reception & Controversy

Joel’s challenges often spark lively debate—especially among all-you-can-eat restaurateurs and fans of competitive eating ethics. Take, for instance, his video where he was “cut off” mid-challenge:

“He goes to all you can eat fish and chips and then he reorders just fish… it’s obvious … he would get cut off when all he reorders is the fish and nothing else.”

—Reddit user on r/competitiveeating

Another perspective:

“He frequently goes to small business restaurants that offer all you can eat, completely exploits them … then completely trashes the restaurant if they … run out of ingredients.”

—Commentary from critics on r/competitiveeating

These viewpoints highlight a tension: some viewers admire his tenacity and scale, while others question the ethics when independent eateries are involved—especially without prior arrangement or compensation.

Why This Challenge Resonates

1. Spectacle Factor

Massive portions are visually compelling. Watching ten battered fish lined up on two plates is enough to attract views—and then keep attention, as viewers wonder if it’ll be conquered.

2. Human drama, amplified

Whether he’s pushing through food fatigue or moments of doubt, live edits and reactions turn a dinner into a performance.

3. Controversy = Engagement

Some argue Joel’s methods are exploitative. Others say he gives small businesses free exposure. That tension drives comments, discussions, and shares—which is undoubtedly part of the strategy.

Conclusion

Joel Hansen’s “10 battered fish with chips on two plates” challenge epitomizes his signature blend of scale, showmanship, and spectacle. While it’s undeniably thrilling to watch such a feat live—or in high-production video form—it also sits at the heart of a debate: when does content become exploitation? It’s a question fans continue to discuss, even as they munch and scroll.

Attached is a news article regarding Joel Hansen 10X battered fish challenge

https://www.reddit.com/r/competitiveeating/comments/1ervljw/has_joel_hansen_ever_failed_a_challenge_or_does/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Trump–Zelenskyy Summit in Washington, D.C.: High-Stakes Diplomacy Unfolds

On August 18, 2025, President Donald Trump hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House, joined by a coalition of key European leaders, in a critical effort to address the ongoing war in Ukraine.

What’s Going On

• Purpose & Context

The summit follows Trump’s controversial meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, where he notably abandoned a push for a ceasefire, instead suggesting that a quick “peace deal” might be possible—if Zelenskyy ceded territory in the Donbas region.

Ukraine, backed by European leaders, remains firm in rejecting any peace terms requiring territorial concessions, maintaining that such outcomes violate its constitution and sovereignty.

Who’s in the Room

Joining Zelenskyy at the White House were:

• European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen

• French President Emmanuel Macron

• German Chancellor Friedrich Merz

• UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer

• Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni

• Finnish President Alexander Stubb

• NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutt

Their presence underscores a determined Western unity backing Ukraine’s position—and offering support for stronger security guarantees.

The Agenda

1. Timing and Format

• Noon (16:00 GMT): Arrival of European leaders.

• 1:00 pm (17:00 GMT): Zelenskyy arrives.

• 1:15 pm (17:15 GMT): Bilateral Oval Office meeting.

• 2:15 pm (18:15 GMT): Trump greets European leaders in the State Dining Room.

• 2:30 pm (18:30 GMT): Group photo in Cross Hall.

• 3:00 pm (19:00 GMT): Multilateral meeting in the East Room.

2. Key Discussion Points

• Territorial Concessions: Trump has implied that peace could be achieved quickly if Ukraine relinquishes control of Crimea and parts of the Donbas—a proposal Zelenskyy and allies firmly reject.

• Security Guarantees: Discussions focus on securing NATO-style protections, akin to Article 5, as a framework for Ukraine’s defense—potentially delivering assurances without formal NATO membership.

3. Political Tensions and Strategic Pressures

• Trump’s Position: He’s ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine and suggesting Crimea will remain under Russian control—positions viewed by Kyiv and its allies as concessions that embolden Russia.

• Ukraine’s Stance: Zelenskyy insists that peace must be lasting and enforceable, not a temporary ceasefire. He emphasises that only strong, structured guarantees from the West can safeguard Ukraine’s future.

Attached is a news article regarding zenlensky meeting with Trump in Washington DC

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm21j1ve817o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Gangland Shooting Leaves Nine-Year-Old With Bullet Wound

A nine-year-old child has been left fighting for their life after being caught in the crossfire of a gangland shooting that shook a quiet residential street last night.

Emergency services were called shortly after 8pm following reports of multiple gunshots in a densely populated area. Witnesses described scenes of panic as masked gunmen opened fire, targeting a rival group in what police believe was a planned gang-related attack.

The young victim, who was walking home with family at the time, was struck by a stray bullet. Residents rushed to provide first aid before paramedics arrived. The child was taken to hospital in critical condition, where doctors are working around the clock to stabilise them.

Police have launched a large-scale investigation and confirmed that extra armed patrols have been deployed to prevent further violence. No arrests have yet been made, but detectives are appealing for witnesses and urging members of the public not to remain silent.

One local resident described the incident as “like a war zone,” with gunfire echoing through the street and families ducking for cover. Another neighbour, visibly shaken, said: “This was meant to be a safe community. Now a child has been shot because of these gangs — it’s devastating.”

Authorities have condemned the shooting, with community leaders calling for urgent action to tackle rising gang violence. The Home Secretary described the attack as “utterly abhorrent” and vowed to provide police with additional resources.

The incident has reignited debate around gun crime in Britain, where firearms are strictly regulated but increasingly smuggled into the country by organised criminal groups.

Attached is a news article regarding gangland shooting that left nine year old with bullet wound

https://news.sky.com/story/man-guilty-over-dalston-gangland-shooting-that-left-nine-year-old-girl-with-bullet-lodged-in-brain-13411992

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Sunday, 17 August 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers m, sponsored by smileband,

Britain’s Top Bosses Pocket Record Executive Pay for Third Year Running

London, 18 August 2025 — In an era of mounting economic pressures for workers, Britain’s highest-paid executives are seeing unprecedented rewards. For the third year in a row, pay packages for FTSE 100 chief executives have reached record heights—underscoring widening inequalities at the top of corporate Britain.

Key Findings from the High Pay Centre

• Median CEO pay reached £4.58 million for the financial year 2024–25, up nearly 7% from £4.29 million the previous year. This represents the highest median pay ever recorded for FTSE 100 CEOs.

• Average (mean) CEO compensation surged to £5.91 million, a 15.4% increase from £5.12 million, breaking the previous record set in 2017–18.

• Collectively, FTSE 100 companies paid over £1 billion to their 217 top executives—up from £757 million the prior year—a rise largely driven by payouts at Melrose Industries.

Spotlight on Key Companies

• Melrose Industries stood out with executive payouts totaling £212 million. Co-founders Simon Peckham and Peter Dilnot, among others, received a combined £59 million via long-term incentive plans (LTIPs).

• Pearson, the education publisher, along with AstraZeneca, also featured among the highest-paid. Pearson’s current and former CEOs pocketed nearly £19 million combined, while AstraZeneca’s CEO Pascal Soriot earned £14.7 million.

• The number of CEOs earning over £10 million increased from 10 to 13 in just a year.

Executive Pay vs. the Average Worker

• The average FTSE 100 CEO now earns 122 times more than the typical full-time UK worker.

• Despite incremental wage gains for many UK workers, the gulf between executive compensation and average incomes continues to widen.

Gender Disparities Remain

• Female CEOs still lag behind their male peers, with median pay at £3.27 million versus £4.64 million for male CEOs in companies led entirely by men throughout the financial year.

Criticism and Calls for Reform

The High Pay Centre, through its director Luke Hildyard, denounced the growing imbalance, warning that such “excessive rewards” deepen economic inequality. They advocate for significant reforms, including:

• Clearer corporate pay reporting

• Greater worker representation on company boards

• Stronger transparency in remuneration structures.

Amid Economic Hardship, Disparities Grow

This wave of record pay comes at a stark contrast to the ongoing cost-of-living challenges faced by many households. While executive incentives climb, pressures on everyday workers, from rent to food costs, continue to escalate.

What Lies Ahead

As boardrooms hand out increasingly generous packages, a growing chorus—workers, unions, and think tanks—are calling for fairer distribution of corporate wealth. Proposed reforms, such as the Employment Rights Bill, aim to realign power in pay-setting and enhance workforce influence in executive reward decisions.

Attached is a news article regarding uk to bosses get pay a record salary for the third time over three years

https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/aug/12/ftse-100-chief-executive-pay-reaches-highest-level-on-record

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Trump Reportedly Considering Putin’s Demand for Control of Parts of Ukraine

Former U.S. President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s demand for control of parts of Ukraine, according to diplomatic sources close to ongoing discussions. The reports suggest that Trump, who has frequently pledged he could end the war in Ukraine “within 24 hours,” is exploring concessions that could dramatically reshape the conflict.

The discussions reportedly center on Russian-occupied territories in eastern Ukraine and Crimea. Putin has consistently insisted that Russia’s control over these regions must be recognized as part of any peace settlement. Such a move, however, would mark a major departure from Western policy, which has long demanded the restoration of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Trump’s approach appears to be based on his argument that prolonging the war risks escalating tensions between NATO and Russia, raising fears of a wider conflict. Supporters of Trump’s stance claim that his willingness to negotiate directly with Moscow could end hostilities and save lives.

However, critics warn that any concession to Putin’s territorial demands would embolden Russia and undermine international law. Ukrainian officials have repeatedly stated they will not cede land to Russia, insisting that the war is about their survival as an independent nation.

European leaders have also expressed alarm at the possibility of Trump altering the Western stance on Ukraine. A senior EU diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, described the idea as “a dangerous gamble that could fracture the alliance.”

The reports come amid heightened speculation over Trump’s foreign policy priorities should he return to the White House. While no formal agreement has been reached, insiders claim that Trump’s willingness to consider Putin’s terms signals a more pragmatic—though deeply controversial—approach to the conflict.

For Kyiv, the stakes could not be higher. Any recognition of Russian sovereignty over occupied territories would set a precedent that risks destabilizing Europe’s security architecture for decades.

Attached is a news article regarding trump considering Putin demand for parts of Ukraine

https://www.itv.com/news/2025-08-16/pm-to-speak-with-allies-amid-reports-trump-mulling-russian-land-grab-in-ukraine

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Inside Belmarsh Prison: Britain’s Most Notorious Jail

Belmarsh Prison, officially known as HMP Belmarsh, has long been regarded as one of the most high-profile and secure prisons in the United Kingdom. Located in Thamesmead, southeast London, the institution has housed some of the country’s most dangerous criminals, convicted terrorists, and high-profile inmates since it first opened in 1991.

A Fortress in London

Belmarsh was built as a Category A prison, designed to hold men considered to be the highest security risks. Surrounded by high walls, razor wire, and state-of-the-art surveillance, the prison has often been compared to a fortress. With a capacity of over 900 inmates, Belmarsh operates under the tightest security standards in the UK prison system.

Notorious Inmates

The prison is best known for housing some of Britain’s most infamous inmates. Among them are terrorists, gang leaders, and high-profile figures such as radical preacher Abu Hamza, hate preacher Anjem Choudary, and alleged WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is currently fighting extradition from Belmarsh. It has also held murderers and organised crime bosses, making it a symbol of Britain’s fight against both terrorism and organised crime.

“The British Guantanamo”

Because of the high concentration of terrorism-related prisoners, Belmarsh has often been dubbed the “British Guantanamo.” Human rights campaigners have criticised the prison for its treatment of inmates, particularly those held on extended remand or without charge under anti-terrorism laws in the 2000s.

Daily Life Inside

Life in Belmarsh is harsh but regimented. Inmates are subject to strict routines, with limited association time and high levels of monitoring. Facilities include educational programs, a healthcare wing, and a segregation unit for the most violent offenders. Despite its reputation, reports from former inmates describe conditions as varying—some calling it manageable, others labelling it deeply isolating.

Violence and Security Incidents

Like many prisons in the UK, Belmarsh has faced problems with violence, contraband smuggling, and overcrowding. In recent years, assaults on staff and clashes between rival gangs have been reported. The prison service has continually tried to tighten security, including crackdowns on illegal mobile phones and drug smuggling.

A Symbol of British Justice

Belmarsh is not only a prison but a symbol of state authority, representing how Britain deals with its most dangerous and high-profile offenders. To critics, it reflects the darker side of the justice system—where isolation and strict control dominate. To supporters, it is a vital part of keeping the public safe.

Attached is a news article regarding belmarsh prison

https://www.independent.co.uk/topic/hmp-belmarsh

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Multiple Gunmen Open Fire at Brooklyn Restaurant—Three Dead, Eight Injured

Brooklyn, New York — August 17, 2025 — In the early hours of Sunday, a shooting unleashed devastation at Taste of the City Lounge, a popular hookah lounge and restaurant in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. Around 3:30 a.m., multiple gunmen opened fire inside the crowded venue, resulting in the deaths of three men and injuries to eight others.

The Victims

• Fatalities: Three male victims were pronounced dead at the scene, including men aged 27 and 35; the age of the third has not been confirmed.

• Injured: Eight other patrons were wounded and rushed to local hospitals; their injuries are reported as non-life-threatening. Among the injured are five men and three women ranging from ages 27 to 61.

The Crime Scene

• Authorities recovered at least 36 shell casings from inside the lounge. A firearm was also discovered nearby, though its connection to the shooting remains under investigation.

• Witnesses described chaos: police lights, ambulances, and extensive crime scene tape created a tense tableau as first responders secured the area and began gathering evidence.

Investigation Underway

• The NYPD has yet to release the identities of any suspects, and no arrests have been made at this time. Investigators are meticulously reviewing surveillance footage and conducting interviews to piece together the events.

• Commissioner Jessica Tisch affirmed the extraordinary nature of the attack, noting that New York City has experienced its lowest number of shooting victims on record over the first seven months of 2025. This incident is being treated as a disturbing anomaly.

• The gunfire likely stemmed from a dispute inside the venue, though the exact motivations remain unclear. At present, no information has been provided regarding any suspects or their potential motives.

The Venue’s History

Taste of the City Lounge—a Caribbean-American restaurant offering hookah, DJs, and a vibrant nightlife—has operated for around three years. Notably, it was previously the scene of a non-fatal shooting in November 2024.

Attached is a news article regarding deadly shooting in New York killing three and injuring 8

https://abc7ny.com/amp/post/3-dead-8-wounded-shooting-taste-city-crown-heights-brooklyn/17565665/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561