222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Tuesday, 19 August 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Trump Says No U.S. Troops Will Be Sent to Ukraine to Fight Russia

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has made it clear that, if he were in charge, no American troops would be sent to Ukraine to engage in direct combat against Russian forces. His comments come amid ongoing debate in Washington over the extent of U.S. involvement in the war, with both military aid and diplomatic pressure on Moscow continuing to dominate international discussions.

Speaking at a rally, Trump emphasized that “American soldiers should never be sent to fight and die in foreign wars that are not our own,” insisting that his administration would have avoided the escalation entirely. He claimed that the war in Ukraine would not have happened under his leadership, citing his past relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin as evidence that diplomacy could have prevented the invasion.

Trump’s stance contrasts sharply with calls from some U.S. lawmakers who argue that more direct involvement may eventually be necessary if Ukraine’s defenses collapse under Russian advances. While President Joe Biden has repeatedly stated that no American combat troops will be deployed in Ukraine, his administration continues to provide billions in military assistance, intelligence support, and training for Ukrainian forces.

Critics accuse Trump of taking too soft a line on Russia, pointing to his past reluctance to criticize Putin and his suggestions that Ukraine should make territorial concessions to secure peace. Supporters, however, argue that his position reflects the will of many Americans who are weary of costly foreign wars following decades of U.S. involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.

European leaders are watching closely, with some expressing concern that Trump’s potential return to the White House could weaken NATO’s unity in supporting Ukraine. Others, however, believe his approach could accelerate peace negotiations, especially if Kyiv were pressured into a settlement with Moscow.

As the war enters a critical phase, Trump’s remarks have reignited debate over America’s role in one of the most dangerous conflicts in Europe since World War II. Whether his stance represents a path toward de-escalation or a retreat from global responsibilities remains deeply contested on both sides of the Atlantic.

• Trump’s position: He says no U.S. troops should be sent to Ukraine to fight Russia.

• Reasoning: Argues that American soldiers should not die in foreign wars and claims the invasion would not have happened under his leadership.

• Contrast with Biden: Biden also rules out sending troops but continues heavy military and financial aid to Ukraine.

• Criticism of Trump: Opponents say he is too soft on Russia and willing to pressure Ukraine into concessions.

• Support for Trump: Backers believe his stance reflects U.S. public fatigue with foreign wars.

• Impact on Europe: Some European leaders fear his approach could fracture NATO, while others think it could push peace talks.

• Larger context: Debate continues over America’s role in the Ukraine war as fighting intensifies.

Conclusion:

Trump’s declaration that no U.S. troops will ever be sent to Ukraine underscores the deep divide in American foreign policy over how to confront Russia’s war. While his stance appeals to voters weary of endless overseas conflicts, it raises questions about the future of U.S. leadership in NATO and the West’s united front against Moscow. Whether viewed as a path toward peace or a retreat from responsibility, Trump’s position ensures that the debate over America’s role in Ukraine will remain central in the months ahead.

Attached is a News article regarding trump sending no US troops to fight in Ukraine

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/us-troops-wont-defend-ukraine-trump-124782347

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

What the Colour of Your Teeth Says About You, According to Science

Our smiles often make the first impression, but beyond aesthetics, the colour of your teeth can reveal surprising insights about your health, habits, and even genetics. Scientists and dental experts stress that tooth colour isn’t simply a matter of brushing—it’s influenced by biology, lifestyle choices, and age. Here’s what the science says your teeth might be telling the world.

Natural Shades: Why Teeth Aren’t Pure White

Contrary to what Hollywood might suggest, teeth are not naturally dazzling white. Their natural shade is influenced by the dentin—the layer beneath the enamel—which typically has a yellowish hue. Genetics determine how thick or translucent your enamel is, which in turn affects how “white” or “off-white” your teeth appear.

• Ivory to light yellow teeth often signal perfectly normal, healthy enamel.

• Grayish tones can be inherited and may suggest thinner enamel.

White Teeth: Lifestyle or Luck

Bright, white teeth are often associated with good hygiene, youth, and attractiveness. While they can indicate a strong oral-care routine, science shows that whiteness is not always a marker of health. Whitening treatments, professional cleanings, and even lucky genetics can produce pearly whites. Importantly, overly white teeth in middle-aged or older adults can be a giveaway of cosmetic whitening rather than natural colour.

Yellow Teeth: Not Always a Bad Sign

A yellowish tint doesn’t necessarily mean poor dental health. In fact, healthy enamel is slightly translucent, allowing the natural yellow of dentin to show through. However, yellowing can also be linked to:

• Diet: Frequent consumption of coffee, tea, wine, or turmeric.

• Smoking: Nicotine stains enamel over time.

• Ageing: Enamel naturally wears down with age, revealing more dentin.

Brown or Dark Spots: A Warning Sign

When teeth shift from yellow to brownish, science points to possible enamel erosion, cavities, or long-term exposure to tobacco. Dark spots may also indicate untreated tooth decay. In these cases, dentists warn that colour is a symptom, not just a cosmetic concern.

Gray or Blue Tints: Medication and Trauma

Some teeth may appear grayish-blue due to certain medications taken during childhood (such as tetracycline antibiotics). Trauma to a tooth can also disrupt blood flow and lead to internal discoloration, turning it gray or dark.

Black Teeth: A Red Flag

Blackened teeth can result from severe decay, advanced cavities, or heavy staining from substances like chewing tobacco. In rare cases, they can also signal necrosis of the tooth pulp, requiring urgent dental attention.

What Science Says About Perception

Research in psychology shows that tooth colour doesn’t just reflect health—it shapes how others perceive you. Studies reveal that people with whiter teeth are often judged as more attractive, healthier, and more employable. This explains the booming global demand for whitening treatments, despite their limited effect on actual dental health.

Final Word: Beyond Colour

While the shade of your teeth can give clues about your habits and health, dentists stress that regular check-ups, not colour, are the true measure of oral wellbeing. A person with slightly yellow teeth can have far healthier teeth than someone with perfectly white veneers.

Attached is a news article regarding colour of teeth and what it’s says about you

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/health/article-12045979/amp/What-teeth-say-personality.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Closure of Epping’s Bell Hotel: From Asylum Housing to Flashpoint

In August 2025, the controversial use of the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex as temporary accommodation for asylum seekers culminated in a legal and societal turning point. This followed serious sexual assault charges against residents and a surge in community tension, culminating in far-right protests and escalating local unrest.

The Incident that Triggered the Uproar

On 13 July 2025, Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a 38-year-old Ethiopian asylum seeker who had arrived only days earlier, was charged with multiple sexual offenses, including allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl . The allegations ignited outrage, with the standout concern being that Kebatu had been housed in a hotel mere steps from schools and a care home.

From Protest to Violence

Starting mid-July, protests erupted outside the hotel. Initially populated by local families expressing safety concerns, crowds swelled and included far-right activists and counter-protesters. Clashes with police became increasingly common—with reports of thrown projectiles, security fencing, aggressive confrontations, and injuries on both sides.

Meanwhile, Epping Forest District Council took formal measures: in late July, a unanimous vote urged the Home Office to cease using the Bell Hotel for asylum housing and initiated legal proceedings to shut it down.

Second Accusation Fuels Fresh Outrage

As tensions simmered, a second resident was charged. In August 2025, Mohammed Sharwarq, a 32-year-old Syrian, was charged with multiple counts of assault—including sexual assault—raising further alarm among local residents.

Court Ruling: Legal Redress Amid Crisis

On 19 August 2025, the High Court granted a temporary injunction, ordered by Epping Forest District Council, to halt the hotel’s use for asylum purposes. The ruling demanded the removal of all asylum seekers from the Bell Hotel within 24 days, citing planning violations and exacerbated community safety risks.

Despite attempts by the Home Secretary to intervene—arguing the move could stoke further protests—the court upheld the injunction. Hotel operators called it “draconian,” warning of severe financial repercussions, as the hotel’s usual occupancy had dropped to just 1% when it relied on government contracts to fill rooms.

Wider Implications and Public Concern

The Bell Hotel situation has emerged as a national focal point in the UK’s debate over asylum policy, particularly the use of hotels for temporary accommodation. Refugee charities argue that such sites are inherently unsafe, especially for women and children, pointing to repeated incidents and systemic failures in vetting and oversight

Cases like this have spurred violent protests in other locales, such as Canary Wharf, and added urgency to calls for comprehensive reforms to the UK’s asylum housing strategy

This article brings forward the complex intersection of public safety, immigration policy, local governance, and community sentiment. Let me know if you’d like a deeper dive into the legal aspects, protest dynamics, or policy implications.

Attached is a news article regarding sexual assault as the migrant hotel closes down in Epping

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy98gdnrl7lo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Japan’s Most Dangerous Gang: The Yakuza Underworld

For centuries, Japan’s criminal underworld has been dominated by the Yakuza, a sprawling network of organized crime groups that have shaped the nation’s hidden economy. Among these syndicates, the Yamaguchi-gumi, headquartered in Kobe, is widely regarded as Japan’s most powerful and dangerous gang. With roots stretching back to 1915, the group has grown into an empire that at its peak boasted more than 40,000 members, making it the largest organized crime syndicate in the world.

Origins and Rise to Power

The Yamaguchi-gumi was founded by Harukichi Yamaguchi, initially as a dockworkers’ union. Over the decades, it evolved into a formidable criminal organization, operating in gambling, construction, extortion, and later drug trafficking. The gang’s hierarchical structure, modeled like a family with an “oyabun” (boss) at the top and “kobun” (loyal subordinates) below, instilled fierce loyalty and discipline among members.

The group thrived during Japan’s post-war economic boom, embedding itself in industries from real estate to finance, often serving as a shadow partner to legitimate businesses. Their reach extended beyond Japan, with operations noted in Southeast Asia, the United States, and Europe.

Violence and Influence

While some Yakuza groups publicly claim to follow a “code of honor” and reject indiscriminate violence, the Yamaguchi-gumi has a long history of brutality. Gang wars with rival syndicates, such as the Sumiyoshi-kai and Inagawa-kai, have spilled blood in the streets of Tokyo and Osaka. Murders, extortion rackets, and intimidation campaigns remain part of their arsenal.

Despite crackdowns by Japanese authorities, the Yamaguchi-gumi continues to wield power. Splinter groups, such as the Kobe Yamaguchi-gumi, have emerged after internal disputes, leading to further gang conflicts. Experts warn these feuds increase the risk of street-level violence, drawing public attention to an underworld that usually operates in the shadows.

Decline or Reinvention

In recent years, Japan has passed tougher anti-Yakuza laws, making it illegal for businesses to associate with gang members. Membership has reportedly declined, with estimates suggesting fewer than 12,000 active Yamaguchi-gumi affiliates remain today. Yet many analysts believe the syndicate has adapted, shifting its activities into cybercrime, fraud, and international money laundering.

Despite this, the aura of the Yamaguchi-gumi endures. Their tattoos, rituals, and reputation continue to inspire fear, fascination, and cinematic portrayals of Japan’s criminal elite. For law enforcement, they remain a formidable adversary—an entrenched organization that blends tradition with modern crime.

Conclusion

The Yamaguchi-gumi stands as Japan’s most dangerous gang, not only for its violent history but for its ability to adapt and survive. While police pressure and social rejection have weakened its grip, the syndicate’s legacy ensures it remains one of the world’s most notorious criminal groups.

Attached is a news article regarding japans most dangerous gang

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-39771584.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Vegetable Prices Set to Soar After Hot and Dry Summer

Shoppers across the UK are being warned to brace for a sharp rise in vegetable prices following one of the hottest and driest summers on record. Farmers say prolonged heatwaves and a lack of rainfall have taken a devastating toll on crops, leaving supply chains under severe strain and raising fears of shortages in the coming months.

According to industry experts, the most affected vegetables include potatoes, carrots, onions, and leafy greens, all of which require consistent rainfall to thrive. Yields are expected to be down by as much as 30–40% in some areas, forcing wholesalers and supermarkets to pay more for limited produce. Those costs are almost certain to be passed on to consumers.

Jack Ward, chief executive of the British Growers Association, warned: “This summer’s weather has been punishing for farmers. Irrigation systems can only do so much when you’re facing weeks without rain. We are now seeing smaller crops, lower volumes, and, inevitably, higher prices.”

The impact will not only be felt in supermarkets but also in restaurants, schools, and canteens, where fresh vegetables form a staple part of meals. Economists suggest that the price of everyday essentials like a bag of potatoes or a head of lettuce could increase by as much as 20% before winter.

Climate change is also being cited as a factor behind the volatility in food prices. With unpredictable weather patterns now the norm, agricultural specialists warn that the UK must adapt its farming practices or face repeated shocks to supply.

Households, already squeezed by rising energy and housing costs, are likely to feel the pinch hardest. Charities have raised concerns that low-income families will cut back on fresh produce altogether, with knock-on effects for public health.

The government has yet to announce specific measures to support growers, though ministers have signalled that discussions are under way with the farming sector to ease the financial burden.

For now, both farmers and consumers will be keeping a close eye on the weather forecast. Another dry spell could spell even more trouble for next year’s harvest, meaning that the era of cheap, plentiful vegetables may be coming to an end.

Attached is a news article regarding how high the price of vegetables will go after a hot and dry summer

https://inews.co.uk/news/environment/fears-food-prices-go-up-autumn-unprecedented-summer-weather-3864501?srsltid=AfmBOorCAgj-SWgB7mHI9n06zXWUR3TRzJJLI-2Zao3aVHjobyex-tIp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

For Women Scotland Launches Fresh Legal Action Against Scottish Government

Background: Supreme Court Victory

Earlier this year, on 16 April 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered a unanimous judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers, affirming that in the Equality Act 2010, the terms “woman”, “man”, and “sex” refer strictly to biological sex, and do not extend to individuals with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).

The Court emphasized that while the Equality Act retained protections for transgender individuals under the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, the legal definition of sex remained unaltered.,

The Scottish Government accepted the judgment and pledged to review and amend related guidance, particularly concerning public boards, education, prisons, and other single-sex services.

New Litigation: Tackling Continued Policies

Despite the Supreme Court ruling, For Women Scotland argue that some government policies remain inconsistent with the legal definition affirmed in April. Specifically, they point to:

• Schools Guidance: Policies encouraging transgender pupils to use facilities they “feel most comfortable with,” including single-sex toilets.

• Scottish Prison Service (SPS) Policy: Accommodation guidance that allows transgender women into the female estate under certain risk assessments.

On 17 August 2025, For Women Scotland lodged an ordinary action for reduction (a type of legal challenge aimed at quashing policy) at the Court of Session, seeking to:

• Declare the school and prison guidance unlawful and have them quashed entirely.

• Suspend the policies immediately, pending judgment

The group stated they had “little choice” but to pursue this course, citing the detrimental impact on “vulnerable women and girls” The Scottish Government declined comment, citing the ongoing legal proceedings.

Legal Nuances: Why It Matters

This action follows a swift legal path, using ordinary litigation rather than a judicial review, aiming for a faster resolution. For Women Scotland also indicated they would seek an interim court order to halt the policies while the case proceeds .

Political and Financial Context

• The original Supreme Court battle was expensive, with legal costs for the Scottish Government reaching nearly £160,000, and earlier expenses adding more—raising taxpayer concerns .

• The controversy underscores deep divisions within Scottish politics—balancing women’s biological rights and trans protections, with both sides citing law and equality values

In Summary

• Supreme Court Ruling (16 April 2025): “Woman”, “man”, and “sex” refer to biological sex only—GRCs do not redefine this under the Equality Act.

• Current Legal Action (Aug 2025): For Women Scotland challenges current Scottish Government policies on school toilets and prison housing, alleging they conflict with the Supreme Court’s ruling.

• Goal: To have these policies declared unlawful and suspended immediately.

Attached is a news article regarding women Scottish launches legal action against Scottish government on gender

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/scottish-scottish-government-court-of-session-sunday-times-b2809078.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, Sponsored by smileband,

Spain’s Wildfires Grow in Ferocity as More Troops Deployed

Spain is grappling with an unprecedented wildfire emergency — one of the most severe in decades. As infernos rage across the country, authorities have raised their response significantly, now deploying nearly 1,900 military personnel to assist firefighters and emergency teams.

Extent of the Disaster

• The wildfires have burned an estimated 344,400 hectares — roughly the size of Mallorca — according to the EU’s European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS).

• Galicia and Castile and León have borne the brunt, yet flames have now spread to the Picos de Europa mountains, prompting disruption of key pilgrim routes.

• The historic Camino de Santiago pilgrimage path, between Astorga and Ponferrada, has been closed to prevent risk to walkers.

Human Toll and Evacuations

• At least four people have died, including a firefighter involved in a crash, while several others are severely injured.

• Over 31,000 people have been evacuated from vulnerable zones across Galicia alone.

The Heatwave Factor

• This crisis stems from one of the most prolonged heatwaves in 50 years, with temperatures soaring to 45 °C, creating intensely dry, fire-prone conditions.

• Scientists highlight that Europe has warmed at twice the global average since the 1980s, intensifying droughts and vegetation flammability.

Military and International Support Response

• The Military Emergency Unit (UME), co-ordinated under Defence Minister Margarita Robles, has deployed 1,900 soldiers to support firefighting efforts.

• Spain has invoked the European Civil Protection Mechanism, receiving water-dumping aircraft and fire-rescue aid from Germany, Slovakia, the Netherlands, France, and Italy.

• Thick smoke is currently hindering aerial operations, complicating fire suppression from the skies.

Political and Royal Involvement

• Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has called for a broad, bipartisan climate pact, emphasizing national unity in facing climate emergencies.

• King Felipe VI interrupted his summer vacation to visit the UME command at Torrejón Air Base, personally conveying thanks to the forces combating the wildfires.

Attached is a news article regarding Spain wildfires as more then 500 more soldiers deployed as blazes spread

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz60y7npl32o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Ceasefire in the Balance: Israel Advances as a 60-Day Truce Gains Traction

A Glimmer of Hope on the Table

On August 18–19, 2025, Hamas announced its acceptance of a proposed 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, brokered by Egypt and Qatar with U.S. backing. The deal envisions the release of half of the Israeli hostages in exchange for around 200 Palestinian detainees, along with other civilians such as women and minors, and includes partial Israeli military withdrawal and increased humanitarian access. Israel is currently reviewing Hamas’s response.

Humanitarian Crisis Deepens Amid Ongoing Operations

Despite these diplomatic developments, fighting continues unabated. Israeli forces are advancing into Gaza City, particularly in areas like Sabra, even as more than a million Palestinians face famine, displacement, and an escalating humanitarian emergency. At least 20 Palestinians were killed in recent operations.

The UN has criticized Israel for not allowing sufficient aid into Gaza—a warning made more urgent by the looming famine. A cargo ship carrying 1,200 tons of relief supplies is approaching Ashdod for delivery.

Rising Public Pressure and Political Pushback

Within Israel, pressure is mounting. Mass protests continue to demand a ceasefire and release of the remaining hostages. Tens of thousands of Israelis are voicing frustration with the ongoing campaign.

Yet the government remains divided. Prime Minister Netanyahu faces resistance from far-right ministers opposed to any truce that does not include full disarmament of Hamas. Israel insists that Hamas surrender its arms and leadership vacate Gaza—demands Hamas has rejected outright.

The Diplomatic Balancing Act

The ceasefire proposal aligns closely with the July U.S.-backed plan, which had mapped a phased hostage release, Israeli withdrawal, humanitarian relief via UN and Red Cross, and negotiations toward a permanent truce. That framework included specific schedules for hostages and territorial pullbacks.

Now, Egypt, Qatar, and the U.S. are attempting to reignite momentum. Hamas’s acceptance has been seen as an opening—but Israel has not yet given its formal agreement.

Looking Ahead: Fear of Escalation

Israel’s military plan includes an imminent ground offensive into Gaza City—billed as the final stronghold of Hamas and possibly initiated within weeks. While that timeline could still allow space for a ceasefire deal, the risk of heightened civilian casualties, hostage endangerment, and wider devastation remains high.

Meanwhile, Israel faces growing international scrutiny over its humanitarian approach, its continued airstrikes amid famine, and its complex domestic politics. Humanitarian groups and the UN warn that “man-made starvation” may soon claim more lives.

As of mid-August 2025, the ceasefire plan represents a rare diplomatic opening—but its realization depends on overcoming deep political, humanitarian, and strategic challenges on the ground.

Attached is a news article regarding Hamas accepting the ceasefire plan as Isreal push forward with Gaza city assault

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgjye15zdlo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Monday, 18 August 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Life Without Parole in the UK: The 20 Most Dangerous Prisoners

In the UK, the most severe form of punishment for the gravest crimes is the whole-life order—a life sentence with no possibility of release. As of March 2025, around 70 individuals are serving such sentences in England and Wales.

Here are 20 of the most infamous individuals holding this grim distinction:

1. Lucy Letby

A former neonatal nurse, convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to kill six others. She received a whole-life order in 2023, becoming one of only a few women ever to receive this sentence.

2. Rose West

Convicted in 1995 for the serial murders of ten women, including her own daughter. A whole-life order was imposed by a Home Secretary in 1997, making her one of the longest-serving inmates with this sentence.

3. Levi Bellfield

Responsible for multiple murders including that of schoolgirl Milly Dowler, he is now the only convicted criminal in UK history serving two whole-life orders.

4. Wayne Couzens

A former police officer whose heinous murder of Sarah Everard in 2021 was deemed so egregious that he received a whole-life order, even though it was a single murder of an adult. His appeal was rejected in 2022.

5. Thomas Mair

The neo-Nazi who murdered MP Jo Cox in 2016 was given a whole-life sentence due to the political and ideological nature of his crime.

6. Stephen Port

Known as the “Grindr Killer,” he murdered four young men and raped several others. He was handed a whole-life order in 2016.

7. Mark Bridger

Convicted in 2013 for the abduction and murder of five-year-old April Jones, his sentence was a whole-life order and he withdrew his appeal the following year.

8. Dennis Nilsen

A serial killer who murdered and dismembered numerous young men in North London during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Successive Home Secretaries ruled that he should never be released.,

9. Ian Brady & Myra Hindley

Infamous as the “Moors Murderers,” they killed multiple children in the 1960s. Hindley was the first woman to receive a whole-life tariff in 1990.

10. Robert Maudsley

Nickname “Hannibal the Cannibal,” he murdered fellow inmates inside prison and is considered one of the most dangerous, spending decades in solitary confinement.

11. John Childs

A hitman responsible for six contract killings; he confessed to more while incarcerated. Received a whole-life order and is still imprisoned.

12. Anthony Entwistle

Convicted of raping and murdering a teenager just days after release from a prior rape sentence—he was given a whole-life order.

13. Victor Miller

A prolific sex offender, he requested and received a whole-life order after murdering a 14-year-old boy in 1988.

14. John Duffy

Known as the “Railway Killer,” he raped and murdered multiple women in the late 1980s. Originally had a minimum term, but later received a whole-life tariff.

15. Anthony Arkwright

At just 21, he went on a brutal, short-lived killing spree in 1988. He remains the youngest ever to receive a whole-life order.

16. Peter Moore

Known as “The Man in Black,” he murdered four men and sexually assaulted dozens over two decades. His whole-life order survived legal challenges.

17. Ryan Matthews

Given a whole-life order in 2015 after murdering a healthcare assistant at a psychiatric hospital.

18. David Mitchell

Killed Robert Hind while on licence from a previous life sentence, including dismemberment—received a whole-life order in 2015.

19. Jason Gomez (and Paul Wadkin)

While serving a life sentence, Gomez invited a fellow inmate into his cell and stabbed him nearly 190 times. He was given a whole-life tariff in 2015.

20. Ian Birley

On parole after 18 years for a previous murder, he brutally stabbed another man 69 times—received a whole-life sentence.

Context and Implications

Whole-life orders are reserved for crimes of exceptional severity—cases often involving extreme violence, multiple victims, abuse of position (e.g., Wayne Couzens), ideological motives, or particularly depraved behavior. Judges or Home Secretaries may impose them under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, with judicial imposition being more common since then.

Ethical and legal debates continue, particularly around their human rights implications. The European Court of Human Rights once viewed irreducible whole-life sentences as potentially inhuman, but UK courts have ultimately upheld their legality.

Attached is a news article regarding Britain deadliest prisoners

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clynxgr464eo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

London’s Largest Cannabis Shipment**: The Case Involving Yeboah and Bonsu

Overview

In what has been dubbed one of London’s biggest cannabis smuggling operations, four men—including Daniel Yeboah and Kwaku Bonsu—were convicted for importing approximately 1.5 tonnes of cannabis, concealed within sacks of gari powder, from Ghana to the UK. The operation, foiled by the National Crime Agency (NCA) at Tilbury Docks, would have had a devastating impact, with an estimated street value of £4.3 million.

The Smuggling Scheme

• Container Arrival and Concealment

The shipment arrived at Tilbury Docks on 19 December 2019. Hidden inside 2,335 packages of herbal cannabis, the contraband was obscured within white hessian sacks of gari powder—a staple flour made from cassava roots.

• Interception and Sting

Intelligence shared between the NCA and the Ghanaian Narcotics Control Commission led to the interception. Authorities replaced the cannabis with dummy packages, allowing the container to continue its journey—and thus set up a controlled delivery.

• Delivery and Arrest

On 13 January 2020, the container made its way to an industrial yard in north London under surveillance. Here, Yeboah signed the delivery note using a false identity, and the container’s seal was cut with an angle grinder. Bonsu was observed photographing the container, while Adjei dropped off Baidoo. Upon discovering the drugs were missing, all four fled the scene—but were swiftly arrested later that day.

• Evidence of Organised Operation

At Baidoo’s address, authorities discovered a 10-tonne hydraulic press typically used for compressing drugs, along with phones and dashcam footage. Notably, calls intercepted via Adjei’s dashcam included: “my brother, be a little watchful. It is all a little dodgy.” Yeboah, too, was recorded saying: “I don’t think the food [drugs] is in it” and “there was gari inside… the people are thieves.”

• Sentencing

On 18 October 2024, at Southwark Crown Court:

• Daniel Yeboah was sentenced to 5 years.

• Edward Adjei received 4 years.

• Kristoffen Baidoo, tried in absentia, received 10 years.

• Kwaku Bonsu, also absent, was sentenced to 7 years. Both Baidoo and Bonsu remain at large.

The combined sentence totalled 26 years, emphasizing the gravity of the operation.

Significance & Context

The NCA characterized the case as a major blow to organised criminal networks targeting the UK, especially those facilitating “county lines” drug distribution. Had the shipment entered street-level supply, it could have fueled violence, exploitation, and further criminality across communities.

Attached is a news article regarding the biggest cannabis bust in London from Africa

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq821qv3ek0o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561