Sunday, 14 September 2025

Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

“Unite the Kingdom”: Massive March Through London

On 13 September 2025, London saw one of the largest far-right demonstrations in recent UK history: the “Unite the Kingdom” march, organised by Tommy Robinson (Stephen Yaxley-Lennon). The rally was framed by its organisers as a stand for free speech, British heritage, and opposition to immigration policies which they say have neglected or harmed “the British public.”  

Size and Scope

Estimated attendance: Police and independent estimates put the number of attendees at around 110,000 people. Some sources suggest the figure might have reached up to 150,000.  

Counter-protesters: A smaller but significant counter-protest, organised by Stand Up to Racism, numbered about 5,000 people.  

Police deployment: More than 1,600 officers were deployed to manage the event and to keep the two protests apart. Some came from other forces.  

Route, Atmosphere & Visuals

The march started from multiple gathering points, notably Waterloo Bridge and Lambeth Bridge, then converged toward Whitehall and areas close to Parliament.  

The crowd stretched from Big Ben, across the River Thames and beyond Waterloo Train Station—over about three-quarters of a mile (roughly one kilometre) in places.  

Many of those present carried symbols: Union Jack flags, St George’s Cross (England’s flag), some Israeli flags; others wore hats or slogans referencing immigration. Chanting was reported—some directed at the government, particularly at Prime Minister Keir Starmer.  

Tensions, Confrontations & Police Action

While much of the demonstration proceeded without major incident, several confrontations between marchers and the police were reported:

Some protesters attempted to breach cordons or enter so-called “sterile areas” (buffer zones) meant to keep the Unite the Kingdom march separate from counter-protesters.  

Objects like bottles, flares, and possibly other projectiles were thrown. Some officers sustained injuries; reports vary but at least 26 officers were injured, four of them seriously.  

Arrests: police confirmed 25 people were arrested for offences including violent disorder, assault, and criminal damage.  

Significance & Reactions

Many commentators and political figures have pointed out that this march reflects growing public anxieties about immigration and national identity. The size of the gathering surprised some, including police, who said that parts of Whitehall were so packed that there was no space for all protesters where they had been expected to gather.  

Critics argued that the event was not just about free speech, but included xenophobic, anti-immigrant, and extremist rhetoric. The presence of nationalist symbols, chants against immigrants, and criticism of asylum seekers drew condemnation from anti-racism groups.  

Supporters said the march was a demonstration of political awakening, of voicing concerns they believe are neglected in mainstream discourse. Some said they felt that “homeless British people” were being sidelined while migrants were given more protection or benefits.  

Conclusion

The “Unite the Kingdom” march stands out for its sheer size, the speed with which it mobilised, and the visible signs of nationalistic and anti-immigration sentiment. Whether this reflects a durable shift in UK public opinion, or a temporary outburst catalysed by current events, remains to be seen. But many agree its scale has marked a new moment in the country’s political and social landscape.

Attached is a news article regarding the march through London shouting Tommy Robinson 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwydezxl0xlo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Saturday, 13 September 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Life Sentence for Dalston Gangland Shooting: The Case of Javon Riley

A 33-year-old man, Javon Riley, has been sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of 34 years, for his involvement in a gangland shooting in Dalston, east London, which left a nine-year-old girl with a bullet lodged in her brain.  

The Incident

The shooting took place on 29 May 2024, outside Evin Restaurant on Kingsland High Street, Dalston, Hackney, at about 9:20pm.  

A man riding a stolen Ducati Monster motorbike fired six shots in two seconds towards a group at a table. Three men—Mustafa Kiziltan (35), Kenan Aydogdu (45) and Nasser Ali (44)—were the intended targets, alleged to be members of the Hackney Turks gang.  

Tragically, a nine-year-old girl sitting with her family inside the restaurant was struck in the head by one of the bullets. She was eating ice cream at the time.  

Aftermath and Injury

The girl spent three months in hospital following the attack.  

She has been permanently injured—the bullet remains lodged in her brain, and she is expected to suffer lifelong physical and cognitive difficulties.  

Prosecution and Conviction

Javon Riley was convicted of three counts of attempted murder (relating to the three male targets) and causing grievous bodily harm with intent in respect of the young girl.  

During the trial, evidence showed that Riley played a “key role” in orchestrating the attack: he carried out surveillance (reconnaissance) of the scene, identified targets, drove the gunman away in a stolen car which was later burnt out, and otherwise helped facilitate the operation.  

The Gang Feud Context

The explosion of violence is part of a long-standing feud between two Turkish gangs in north London: the Tottenham Turks and the Hackney Turks. The court was told there have been a series of retaliatory shootings and attempted murders over at least a decade.  

Riley was linked to the Tottenham Turks. He claimed he had been offered around £40,000 to be involved in what he said he believed was a “smash and grab” drug robbery, rather than a planned assassination. The jury rejected this claim.  

Sentence

Justice was done at the Old Bailey, where Judge Mark Lucraft KC imposed the life sentence, with a minimum term of 34 years before Riley can even be considered for parole.  

In sentencing, the judge emphasised the premeditated nature of the crime, the harm done to an innocent child, and the broader danger posed by gang-related violence.  

Wider Implications

Police have offered a £15,000 reward for information that leads to the identification, arrest, and prosecution of the gunman who pulled the trigger—he remains at large.  

The case highlights concerns about how innocent bystanders suffer in gang violence: when children and families going about their everyday lives become victims of shootings intended for others.

There is also criticism of how long such feuds have persisted and how law enforcement and communities have struggled to prevent escalation. The case intensifies calls for more preventative strategies, community engagement, better intelligence-led policing, and efforts to intercept weapons and disrupt gang networks.

Reflection

The sentence reflects both the gravity of the act and its severe consequences for an innocent child, as well as the culpability of someone who, even though he did not pull the trigger, played a central facilitating role. The minimum term of 34 years underscores that non-trigger roles in violent gang crime can still incur top-tier punishment under UK law when the person’s involvement was thoroughly planned and essential to the operation.

Attached is a news article regarding Dalston gangland shooting as man gets life sentence 

https://news.sky.com/story/man-gets-life-sentence-for-dalston-gangland-shooting-that-left-nine-year-old-girl-with-bullet-lodged-in-brain-13428863

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Who is Yung Filly and What’s the Legal Context?

Yung Filly is the stage name of Andres Felipe Valencia Barrientos, a British-YouTuber, rapper, and media personality.  

He is currently facing multiple serious charges in Western Australia, including sexual assault, rape (sexual penetration without consent), assault occasioning bodily harm, and strangulation (impeding breathing).  

He was arrested while in Australia on tour, extradited from Brisbane to Perth, and has been on bail under strict conditions since October 2024.  

What Has Changed: Permission to Return Home to the UK

Recently a Western Australian court modified his bail conditions so that he can temporarily travel back to the UK for the Christmas period. Key details of this amendment include:

He must depart Perth on a set date (Tuesday after approval).  

He must return to Western Australia by 7 January 2026.  

Upon his return, he is required to surrender his passport.  

There is a financial component: a surety of £50,000 plus an undertaking of another £50,000 (on top of what was already required).  

Other restrictions include: residing at a Kent address while in the UK; keeping device location services active; and a gag order: he is not allowed to comment on the case on social media. 

Why This Is Significant

Temporary reprieve for Yung Filly: Until now, his ability to leave Australia was restricted; this allowance shows the court has considered that the risk of him not returning or interfering with ongoing proceedings can be managed under tightened conditions.  

Legal balancing act: Courts often weigh the rights of defendants — including the right to return home or be with family during important periods — against public safety, risk of absconding, and risk of interference with witnesses. The new bail conditions reflect stringent measures to address those risks.

Public relations / reputation stakes: He has already lost brand deals or had collaborations paused (with ASOS; the Football Association; etc.) following the charges. The return may increase media attention and scrutiny.  

What the Return Might Mean in Practice

While he’s in the UK, his movements and communications will be under close oversight due to the strict bail conditions.

He’ll be expected to respect the restrictions (no social media commentary on the case, staying where specified, etc.). Any violation could result in his bail being revoked or worse legal implications.

His return may allow him to see family or handle personal affairs, but it is not a change to his legal case: he remains subject to trial in Perth, expected in July 2026. 

What to Watch Going Forward

How the public reacts: media coverage in the UK vs. Australia, and whether there are any protests or commentaries from organisations, fans, etc.

Whether there will be any legal challenges or calls to alter the conditions further — from either side (prosecution or defence).

The trial in July 2026: how these bail conditions and his UK trip might be referenced by either side in discussions of credibility, risk, or character.

The impact on his career and ongoing or future brand relationships. Even while charges are not convictions, public perception can shift significantly.

Caveats and Uncertainties

The permissions granted are temporary: there is a mandated return date, and failure to comply would have severe consequences.

He’s pleaded not guilty to many of the allegations; legal proceedings are ongoing — no final verdict yet.  

Because the case involves multiple jurisdictions and serious charges, there could be further legal developments (evidence disclosure, witness statements, etc.) that might affect bail conditions down the line.

Conclusion

Yung Filly’s upcoming return to the UK is a notable development in his case: while it gives him some temporary relief and a chance to be in familiar surroundings over the holiday period, it comes with heavy constraints and doesn’t alter the overall trajectory of legal proceedings in Australia. How he navigates this period — legally, publicly, personally — could influence both his trial and his public image moving forward.

Attached is a news article regarding yung filly returning to the uk 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/yung-filly-granted-permission-return-35891411.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Thursday, 11 September 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Mental Health: A Growing Challenge with Deep Societal Roots

Mental health issues are no longer a marginal concern — they now represent one of the most pressing public health challenges of our time. Each year, a significant proportion of the population experiences mental health problems, with far-reaching consequences for individuals and society alike. Increased loneliness, reduced productivity, and lower life expectancy for those with severe illnesses are just some of the stark realities linked to poor mental well-being.

Experts point to deep-rooted social and economic factors as key drivers of this crisis. Economic insecurity, widening social inequality, and persistent discrimination have all been linked to higher risks of developing mental health problems. These pressures disproportionately affect young people, women, and ethnic minorities, compounding existing disadvantages and creating a cycle that is difficult to break.

The growing recognition of these “social determinants” of mental health has shifted the conversation from treatment alone to a focus on prevention and systemic change. Public health specialists stress that robust prevention strategies, including tackling poverty, improving access to housing, and strengthening community support networks, are essential to reducing the burden of mental illness.

Equally critical is the expansion of accessible, community-based mental health care. Services that are easy to reach, culturally appropriate, and stigma-free can help people get support early, preventing conditions from escalating. Reducing stigma remains one of the biggest challenges: despite progress in recent years, many people still feel ashamed to seek help, which can delay treatment and worsen outcomes.

Investing in mental health is more than a moral imperative — it is also an economic one. Healthier, happier communities are more productive, more cohesive, and better able to thrive. Addressing the societal roots of mental health problems offers a path to improved well-being not just for individuals, but for society as a whole.

High prevalence – A large proportion of the population experiences mental health problems each year.

Serious impacts – Poor mental health leads to increased loneliness, reduced productivity, and lower life expectancy for people with severe illnesses.

Societal drivers – Economic insecurity, social inequality, and discrimination significantly increase the risk of mental health problems.

Groups most affected – Young people, women, and ethnic minorities are disproportionately impacted.

Need for prevention – Tackling poverty, inequality, and social exclusion is crucial to reducing mental health problems.

Accessible care – Expanding community-based, culturally appropriate mental health services improves early support.

Reducing stigma – Fighting stigma around mental health encourages more people to seek help earlier.

Economic benefits – Better mental health strengthens communities and boosts productivity, making it an economic as well as a moral priority.

Conclusion:

Improving mental health requires more than treating individual symptoms — it demands tackling the social and economic conditions that drive poor well-being. By investing in prevention, expanding accessible community-based care, and reducing stigma, society can not only improve individual lives but also strengthen social cohesion, productivity, and long-term public health.

Attached is a news article regarding mental health 

https://www.economist.com/britain/2023/12/07/britains-mental-health-crisis-is-a-tale-of-unintended-consequences?utm_medium=cpc.adword.pd&utm_source=google&ppccampaignID=18156330227&ppcadID=&utm_campaign=a.22brand_pmax&utm_content=conversion.direct-response.anonymous&gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=18156330848&gbraid=0AAAAADBuq3IqZKYgj-_TrYNNqqNEXmjgj

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

UK Removes Ambassador to US Peter Mandelson Over Epstein Connections

Date: 11 September 2025

Place: London / Washington D.C.

Summary

Peter Mandelson, the UK’s Ambassador to the United States, was dismissed this week by Prime Minister Keir Starmer amid revelations of previously undisclosed ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The decision came after a series of emails and letters emerged, showing that Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein was deeper and more supportive than had been made public at the time of his appointment.  

Key Revelations

Several pieces of correspondence and documents have come to light, triggering widespread political pressure:

A birthday book compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003 included a handwritten note by Mandelson calling Epstein “my best pal.”  

Emails from 2008, after Epstein’s conviction for soliciting a minor, showed Mandelson advising Epstein to seek early release and describing his conviction as “wrongful.”  

Mandelson admitted that he continued an association with Epstein longer than he should have, saying he was taken in by Epstein’s assurances about his criminal case, which later proved misleading. 

Government Response

The UK Foreign Office stated that the correspondence showed Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein was “materially different to what was known at the time of his appointment.”  

The revelations contradicted what had been disclosed during his vetting, especially the suggestion that Mandelson believed Epstein’s conviction was wrongful.  

In Parliament, officials expressed concern about the impact on the credibility of diplomatic appointments and on the government’s judgment.  

Mandelson’s Position and Plausible Motivations

Mandelson has expressed deep regret about the relationship:

He admitted he “fell for the lies” Epstein told him and others.  

He said he never witnessed any wrongdoing by Epstein personally, but acknowledged he should have been more critical or distancing.  

Political Fallout

The dismissal represents a significant embarrassment for the Starmer government, coming less than a year after Mandelson’s appointment in February 2025.  

It raises questions about vetting procedures for diplomatic appointments and whether existing information was fully reviewed.  

The issue also revives broader concerns about Epstein’s network of friends, associates, and how public figures responded as his criminal conduct became known. 

Implications

Diplomatic trust and reputation: As ambassador to the US is one of the most visible and sensitive diplomatic posts, its holder is expected to have a clean record and clear judgment. The revelations threatened both of these.

Government oversight: There will be pressure for more rigorous background checks and transparency around past associations of public figures.

Victims and public sentiment: The government explicitly cited concern for the victims of Epstein’s crimes as part of the reason for acting. This reflects growing sensitivity to how public institutions and officials must respond in such cases.  

Conclusion

Peter Mandelson’s removal as UK Ambassador to the US shows how revelations of past ties with figures like Jeffrey Epstein can rapidly shift from historical footnote to career-ending political liability. Even for long-established politicians, what was said or done decades ago—especially in communication that appears with new context—can prove decisive. For the UK government, the episode underlines the importance of thorough vetting and the possible costs of underestimating what the public will deem unacceptable in modern standards of accountability.

Attached is a news article regarding US ambassador sacked over ties with Jeffrey Epstein 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0v81zeggko.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Case of James Clacher: Deception, Flight, and Justice

Who is James Clacher?

James Clacher, 57, a former gym manager from North Lanarkshire, Scotland.  

He was accused of violently raping two women whom he met via dating apps — one on Tinder in 2019, the other on Bumble in 2020.  

The Disappearance and Fake Death

In May 2022, as police were preparing to interview him about the rape allegations, Clacher disappeared.  

His car (a Suzuki Swift) was found abandoned in a Loch Long car park in Argyll and Bute, with a suicide note. These details, including messages he had sent, suggested that he intended to kill himself.  

A missing person poster was issued in Scotland. At this stage, authorities believed he may have died, or at least used the staging of his death to evade capture.  

Life on the Run: Reinvention in Spain

Clacher fled to Spain, settling in Nerja, a coastal town on the Costa del Sol. There, he assumed a new identity, going by “Johnny Wilson.”  

He integrated into the local (expat) community. He worked as a gardener at a residential complex, ran yoga classes on the beach, and frequented a local gym. He also entered into a relationship with a local woman, who was apparently unaware of his past.  

As part of covering his tracks, he was careful about photos — for instance, avoiding showing his face in pictures.  

The Tip-Off that Broke the Case

In November 2023, Sky News received an anonymous email with a subject line “James Clacher.” The sender claimed to believe they had seen a man matching Clacher’s description in Nerja — calling himself “Jimmy,” Scottish, and giving details about repeated encounters in a gym.  

This tip gave police a significant lead. Sky News passed the information to Police Scotland, who, in coordination with the National Crime Agency (UK) and the Spanish Guardia Civil, launched an undercover investigation.  

Arrest, Trial & Conviction

He was arrested in May 2024 in Nerja while working out on a beach gym apparatus. Spanish officers, using bodycam footage, detained him.  

Clacher was extradited back to Scotland. The trial was in the High Court in Glasgow.  

He denied wrongdoing and claimed that any sexual activity was consensual. He also maintained he had fled because the case was closing in, among other false narratives.  

The jury found him guilty of the two rape charges.  

Impact & Reactions

One of his victims spoke of being “extremely grateful” that the anonymous tipper came forward, acknowledging that must have been daunting.  

Police acknowledged the distress suffered by the victims, and the judge and prosecution highlighted how many lies Clacher had told, and how elaborate the attempt at deception was.  

Broader Significance

The case illustrates how people can use dating apps to target victims, how offenders may attempt to evade justice by staging their own deaths, fleeing abroad, and assuming false identities.

It highlights the importance of tip-offs and public cooperation in solving such cases. Without the anonymous tip to Sky News, Clacher might not have been located for so long.

Also, the joint investigation across jurisdictions — Scotland, UK agencies, and Spanish law enforcement — was essential. Cross-border crime investigations can be complex; this is an example of them working.

Reflections & Questions Raised

Safety on dating apps: How can users better protect themselves? What responsibilities do platforms have to verify identities, flag suspicious behaviour, etc.

Media involvement: The role of journalism and media outlets (Sky News here) in assisting law enforcement — both through investigative reporting and by being conduits for public information. What ethical concerns does that raise?

International law & extradition: Clacher was caught in Spain, extradited to face trial in Scotland. How efficient and robust are our extradition processes, and what legal obstacles exist?

Victims’ needs: Beyond legal justice, the psychological, social and emotional support for victims both during the ordeal and after conviction.

Attached is a news article regarding dating app rapist who was tracked down by Sky News and fake his own death from Scotland 

https://news.sky.com/story/the-dating-app-rapist-who-faked-his-death-and-forged-a-new-identity-in-spain-13418608

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Charlie Kirk Shot Dead at Utah Valley University in Violent Attack

Orem, Utah — September 11, 2025

Charlie Kirk, conservative activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot on Wednesday, September 10, 2025, while speaking at an outdoor event at Utah Valley University (UVU). He was 31 years old.  

What Happened

The incident took place during a “Prove Me Wrong” style debate event on the first stop of his “American Comeback Tour”, organised by Turning Point USA. Approximately 3,000 people were in attendance.  

Around midday local time, while Kirk was responding to a question from the audience about mass shootings, a single gunshot was fired. Video footage and eyewitnesses report seeing Kirk clutch his neck and fall back in his chair, with visible bleeding.  

According to authorities, the shot came from a rooftop of a university building — specifically from the Losee Center, roughly 200 yards (around 180-200 meters) away from the stage.  

Aftermath and Investigation

Kirk was rushed to hospital in critical condition. Later reports confirm that he died of his injury.  

A manhunt for the shooter is ongoing; as of the latest reports, no suspect has been apprehended. Authorities have released surveillance footage, are following leads, and have multiple crime scenes being examined.  

Two individuals were initially detained but were later released after authorities found no ties to the shooting.  

Campus police, local and state law enforcement, and federal agencies are involved in the investigation.  

Reactions

The killing has drawn widespread condemnation from political figures across the spectrum, citing the act as an attack on free speech, political discourse, and civil society.  

President Donald Trump mourned Kirk publicly, calling him “great and legendary” and has ordered flags to be flown at half-staff as a mark of respect.  

Many commentators have expressed concern over U.S. political polarization and the rise of political violence. Some are urging reform, both in security at public political events and in the tenor of political speech more broadly.  

Significance & Context

Charlie Kirk was a prominent voice in conservative youth politics, founder of Turning Point USA, and closely aligned with Republican political activities. His death represents not just the loss of a political figure but a flashpoint in ongoing concerns about political violence.  

The shooting appears to have been a targeted attack. The distance and vantage point of the shooter suggest planning, raising questions about security protocol at such events.  

What Remains Unknown

The identity of the shooter and motive remain unconfirmed.  

Details about whether this was politically motivated, or whether it stemmed from ideology, personal grievance, or other reasons, are not yet established.

How the security arrangements might have failed, and what actionable changes might be made in similar events in the future, are still under investigation.

This appears to be one of the most serious incidents of political violence in the U.S. in recent years, and its fallout is likely to be on many fronts: legal, political, social, and possibly legislative.

Attached is a news article regarding Charlie Kirk shot dead 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c206zm81z4gt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tamer Hassan: From New Cross to the Big Screen

Early Life and Background

Birth and family

Tamer Hassan was born on 18 March 1968 in New Cross, London, into a Turkish Cypriot family.  

Youth work, early jobs

From a young age Hassan did work on market stalls. He also took up boxing: starting amateur boxing around age 17, in which he won two British titles. An injury led him to change direction.  

Turning to Acting

After the injury ended his boxing ambition, Hassan moved into business (running restaurants and nightclubs) and eventually into acting.  

Some of his early film roles that brought him into wider recognition include:

The Football Factory (2004), where he played the leader of the Millwall firm.  

Other films like Layer Cake (also 2004), Batman Begins (2005), The Business (2005) etc.  

More recently he has appeared in the series Snatch (2017-18) and Game of Thrones (Season 6).  

Personal Life

He is married and has two children. His son is a professional footballer, and his daughter, Belle, appeared on Love Island in 2019.  

He is a fan of Millwall FC.  

Issues with Police, Legal Troubles, or Controversies

In researching available sources, there is no credible public record I found that Tamer Hassan has been convicted of crime, or has serious legal convictions in the UK for wrongdoing. Nor did I find credible, well-documented allegations of criminal offences involving him, apart from his admitted issues with behaviour and professionalism. Below are what is known, and the things sometimes misreported or conflated.

Behavioural issues / reputation on set

Hassan has himself admitted that during the 2000s he was heavy-drinking, partied hard, sometimes arrived to film sets “aggressive, late, hungover” etc., which did impact his reputation and led people to label him “a problem” at times.  

This is not the same as criminal charges or offences, but shows personal and professional difficulties.

No public criminal record found

I searched for records of arrests or convictions associated with him and found nothing credible to suggest he was convicted of serious crimes, or had major run-ins with police beyond perhaps being questioned or involved in minor incidents (if at all).

Rumours vs verifiable facts

Some tabloid sources have hinted at scandals or misbehaviour, but when checked against reliable sources these are either unsubstantiated or insufficiently documented. Whenever dealing with public figures, especially actors, one must distinguish between allegations, rumours, and what is legally proven.

So, while Tamer Hassan has had a rough edge about his public persona and some admitted trouble with his behaviour (especially partying etc.), there is no strong evidence of serious criminal wrongdoing or legal issues involving police beyond what he himself has acknowledged.

Success & Career Resilience

Despite the personal challenges, Tamer Hassan has had a resilient and varied career, with significant achievements.

Film & TV roles

His roles in The Football Factory, Layer Cake, Batman Begins, The Business, Kick-Ass, and later in Snatch, Game of Thrones, among others, show he’s been successful both in British cinema and internationally.  

Typecasting & Strength

Hassan often plays “tough guy” or gangster-type roles, which he has been able to pull off convincingly. This niche has given him a strong presence in British crime / gangster / urban drama genres.

Personal growth

He has spoken publicly about how his lifestyle — heavy partying, casual misbehaviour — nearly damaged his career, and how he needed to grow up, learn discipline, professionalism. These kinds of reflections suggest personal maturity and the ability to adapt.  

Charity & humanitarian work

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Hassan co-founded the charity Mask Our Heroes, delivering PPE to police stations, hospitals, nursing homes, schools. This indicates a side of him invested in giving back.  

Reflection & Conclusion

Tamer Hassan’s journey combines both the rough edges of someone who came up outside of formal training, adopted a hard-knock street persona, and the success of turning that into a stable, recognisable career in film and television.

While he has admitted to behaviours that harmed his reputation — partying too much, being unreliable or unprofessional at times — there is no verified evidence of serious crime or legal charges beyond those admitted issues. On the other hand, he has shown resilience, pivoted, and maintained relevance over decades, which is itself an achievement in a tough industry.

Attached is a news article regarding timer hussan and his career 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamer_Hassan

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Wednesday, 10 September 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Cleveland: Where is it, and what are the boundaries

When people refer to Cleveland in this context, they usually mean the area covering Middlesbrough, Hartlepool, Stockton-on-Tees, and Redcar & Cleveland.  

It’s not a county in administrative terms any more (that disbanded in the 1990s), but crime statistics are still often grouped in this region for comparison.  

Why it’s considered “most dangerous”

According to recent statistics:

Cleveland has the highest crime rate in England & Wales per 1,000 people (excluding fraud) — 139.6 crimes per 1,000 in the year ending September 2022.  

That includes a high number of sexual offences, violence against the person, criminal damage & arson, and drug offences.  

Knife crime is a particular concern. Cleveland has some of the highest rates of knife offences in the UK, second only to e.g. the West Midlands or other major urban areas. 

What contributes to the problem

Several underlying factors are often cited:

1. Deprivation and socio-economic issues

Cleveland has some of the highest levels of income deprivation in England. Areas with high deprivation often see higher crime generally.  

2. Youth involvement & social exclusion

Young people who are excluded from school, or who lack opportunities, are more vulnerable to becoming involved in antisocial behaviour or crime.  

3. Domestic abuse, drug misuse, alcohol, weapons

These are repeatedly flagged as linked to many of the serious and violent crimes.  

4. Hot-spots

The crime is not evenly distributed. Some wards (sub-areas) suffer much more: e.g. central Middlesbrough, the Newport ward, Parkfield and Oxbridge in Stockton. Violence with injury, knife crime, etc., is concentrated. 

What “most dangerous” does — and doesn’t — mean

It’s important to interpret the data carefully:

High crime rate per capita doesn’t always translate to high absolute numbers of every crime type. Some categories may be inflated (reporting bias etc.), others under-reported.

A region being “most dangerous” doesn’t mean every street is unsafe. Many neighbourhoods are relatively calm, many people live without serious risk to personal safety.

Some of the data depends on reporting, policing, community cooperation, which vary between areas.

Comparisons with other places (London, Manchester etc.) can be skewed by differences in population size, urban density, local reporting practices.

Impacts on local people & responses

Fear and perception: For many residents, the statistics shape how safe they feel, especially at night, or in certain neighbourhoods. Stories of violence, knife incidents, and antisocial behaviour contribute to fear.

Public services strain: Policing, healthcare (e.g. hospital admissions from violent injury), social services, youth services are all under pressure.  

Policy & community response: Efforts have been made to target “hot-spots” of crime, employ more preventative interventions (youth programmes, domestic abuse support), and strengthen neighbourhood policing.  

Criticisms and caution

Some argue the label “most dangerous” is sensationalised and may stigmatise whole communities.

Others point out that underlying structural issues (poverty, education, housing) aren’t solved simply with more policing.

Comparisons over time are needed to see if things are getting better or worse. Some data suggest certain crime types are declining.  

Conclusion

Cleveland clearly faces serious crime challenges — among the worst in Britain by many metrics. Knife crime, violence, sexual offences, and the rate per population are all particularly worrying. But as with all such places, danger is not uniform; many people go about their lives without encountering serious crime. The key issues are socio-economic deprivation, lack of options for young people, and certain areas acting as crime hotspots.

Attached is a news article regarding cleaveland the most dangerous place in Britain on the coast of England 

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/cleveland-named-most-dangerous-place-26337957.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

A Brutal, Defenseless Attack: The Death of Iryna Zarutska

On August 22, 2025, a life was taken in an utterly senseless act. Twenty-three-year-old Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian refugee who had fled war, was fatally stabbed aboard a Charlotte light rail train in North Carolina. 

Who She Was

Iryna Zarutska came to the U.S. seeking safety and a new life after escaping the violence in Ukraine.   She was known to be kind, hardworking, and hopeful—working at a pizzeria and studying English at a community college, with dreams of becoming a veterinary assistant. 

The Attack

Where & When: The assault occurred at the East/West Boulevard light rail station as part of Charlotte’s Lynx Blue Line transit system.  

How: The attack was sudden and random. The assailant, identified as Decarlos Brown Jr., rose from behind and stabbed Iryna multiple times in the chest without any apparent provocation.  

Aftermath: She succumbed to her injuries. Brown was arrested shortly afterward and faces several charges, including first-degree murder and federal charges related to violence on a mass transportation system.  



The Suspect, and Underlying Issues

Brown’s background has drawn attention not just for what happened, but for what it reveals about wider systemic issues:

He has a history of mental illness, with reports of schizophrenia.  

He had also experienced homelessness.  

His family has said that in his past, Brown made disturbing claims about being controlled by “man-made materials” or delusions — though legal and medical interventions seem to have been insufficient.  

Public Reaction and Demands for Change

The case has sparked outrage, sorrow, and demands for reform:

Family’s Response: Iryna’s family has called for improvements in transit safety and has urged investigations into how security is managed, including oversight of contractors. They believe lapses in the system contributed to her death.  

Media & Social Media Outcry: Footage of the attack circulated, intensifying calls for better protection of public transit users. There are also pleas for respect, requesting that the video not be spread further so Iryna’s dignity can be preserved.  

Legal Dimension: Brown may face the death penalty due to the federal charges, given that the attack occurred on a mass transit system.  



Broader Implications and Questions Raised

This tragedy raises several urgent issues:

1. Transit Security: How secure are public transit systems, especially at night? What systems of surveillance, training, emergency response, and deterrence are in place or lacking?

2. Mental Health Care: What mechanisms exist to identify, treat, and supervise individuals with serious mental illnesses to prevent such violence? Are there gaps in access, continuity of care, or legal oversight?

3. Homelessness & Vulnerability: The intersection of homelessness and untreated mental illness can lead to situations where individuals may pose risk to themselves or others, often without intervention until a tragedy strikes.

4. Accountability & Oversight: To what extent are transit authorities and security contractors held accountable when security fails contribute to loss of life?

5. Social Responsibility and By-Offer of Help: Many bystanders witnessed the attack. The incident again raises the question of how much individuals can or should intervene, what supports are provided for witnesses, and how society handles “seeing something wrong.”

A Life Cut Short

Iryna Zarutska is remembered by those who knew her as gentle, creative, full of hope — someone who survived the horrors of war, seeking peace and opportunity. She had dreams, work, and a future that was brutally taken.  

Her death demands not just mourning, but reflection. How many more must suffer similarly before safety and justice improve. 

Attached is a news article regarding a women killed on the train in a devastating attack 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/iryna-zarutska-murder-ukraine-refugee-decarlos-brown-video-b2822782.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Cristiano Ronaldo Set to Visit Donald Trump in Surprise High-Profile Meeting In an unexpecte...