Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Inside the Factory: The New Piccadilly Line Trains

A Factory Born for the Future

In Goole, East Yorkshire, Siemens Mobility has built a state-of-the-art rail manufacturing facility—part of a larger “Rail Village”—dedicated to producing the next generation of London Underground’s Tube trains.  

With an investment of around £200 million, the site is more than just a factory: it includes assembly halls, a components servicing facility, a logistics warehouse, and an innovation hub.  

What’s Being Built

The main job for the Goole factory is assembling up to 80% of the new fleet of 94 Piccadilly Line trains. The rest are being initially produced in Vienna.  

These are replacements for the aging 1973-stock trains, which have served for about 50 years.  

What’s New: Features & Upgrades

These trains introduce a number of major improvements compared to the old stock:

• First deep-tube Tube line to have full air conditioning. Until now, deep-level Tube trains (like those on the Piccadilly) haven’t had built-in AC.  

• Walk-through carriages. Passengers will be able to move between all carriages freely, improving circulation and capacity.  

• Wider doors & double doors throughout. These are intended to speed up boarding and alighting, reducing dwell times at stations.  

• Enhanced passenger information & safety. Digital display screens and CCTV are fitted.  

• More energy-efficient & smoother ride. The lighter design, fewer bogies due to part articulation, reduces energy usage (around 20% less energy compared to the old fleet) and is expected to give a more comfortable journey.  

Timeline & Testing

The first of the new trains has already arrived in London (October 2024), following extensive testing in Germany (in test tracks and climate chambers).  

These new trains are expected to begin entering passenger service by end of 2025, with the full fleet in place by the end of 2027.  

In parallel, the Goole factory is already up and running, producing components and beginning assembly. The facility is designed with future UK orders in mind, beyond just the Piccadilly Line.  

Capacity & User Experience

• The new trains increase capacity by about 10% compared to the current Piccadilly Line stock.  

• Train frequency is expected to go from 24 trains per hour to 27 trains per hour at peak times once infrastructure (signalling etc.) allows.  

• Accessibility is improved with better door access, more open space, and overall a more comfortable environment.  

Economic and Regional Impact

• Around 700 high-skilled jobs plus as many as 1,700 supply-chain opportunities are expected to be created by the Goole facility.  

• The Goole “Rail Village” is designed to be a centre of excellence for rail innovation, taking on more than just assembly: development, innovation, servicing, and maintenance.  

Looking Forward: Challenges and What to Watch

While the project promises a lot, there are some pressures & things to keep an eye on:

• Integration & infrastructure readiness (tracks, signalling, power, station modifications) must keep pace. New trains won’t deliver full benefit if other parts of the system lag.

• The improvement in frequency (to 27 trains per hour) depends on upgrades in signalling and other support systems.

• Delivering large-scale rollout on schedule is always sensitive to supply chain, testing and regulatory approvals.

• Ensuring the user experience (temperature control, accessibility, journey time) meets expectations once the trains are in full service. 

Conclusion

The new Piccadilly Line Tube trains being built in the Goole factory represent one of the largest modernisation efforts in London Underground’s recent history: combining improved comfort, energy-efficiency, and capacity, while also delivering regional economic growth. For commuters, the promise is of cooler, more frequent, more reliable journeys. For the rail sector, this is a sign of renewed domestic manufacturing capacity and innovation.

Attached is a news article regarding New underground tube trains 

https://www.itv.com/news/london/2025-08-06/new-air-conditioned-tube-train-tested-deep-below-london-after-delayed-launch

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Digger ATM Heists: Bold, Brazen — and Increasingly Common

Over recent years, law enforcement across the UK and Ireland has documented a growing number of thefts involving heavy machinery — diggers, telehandlers, JCBs — used to forcefully extract cash machines embedded in walls. These operations are often conducted in the dead of night, with stolen equipment, masked perpetrators, and getaway vehicles ready. The crime is dramatic, fast, and causes extensive damage to both buildings and community trust.

Notable Incidents

Here are some high-profile cases illustrating how this method is carried out:

1. Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland

Thieves stole a digger from a nearby business and used it to remove an ATM from the wall of a Danske Bank branch on Mallusk Road at about 03:10 GMT. After the theft, the digger was set alight at the location.  

2. Ballybay, County Monaghan (Republic of Ireland)

In another case, a digger was used to smash a hole in the wall of a Bank of Ireland branch in Ballybay at about 3:00 am. The machine was then towed to the scene by a tractor. The criminals loaded the ATM onto a 4×4 (via a trailer) and escaped in the direction of Cootehill or Carrickmacross.  

3. Tewkesbury, England

Two men used a telehandler (a similar machine to a digger) to rip an ATM from the wall of a Co-operative supermarket in Tewkesbury at around 03:45 BST. They made off with “tens of thousands of pounds” and loaded the ATM into a 4×4. Extensive structural damage occurred.  

4. Dungiven, County Londonderry, Northern Ireland

One of many rural incidents: a stolen digger drove through a security gate, tore the ATM from a garage wall in approximately four minutes, then lifted it into a vehicle with part of its roof removed.  

5. Newry, County Armagh / County Monaghan

At a filling station on Camlough Road, on Newry’s outskirts, thieves used a stolen digger to rip a cash machine from the wall. Following the theft, the digger was burned, blocking a road, and police located the stolen ATM later. 

Modus Operandi & Patterns

From examining these incidents, some patterns emerge:

• Use of stolen machinery: In many cases, the digger/telehandler used has itself been stolen from construction sites nearby.  

• Timing: The thefts almost always occur overnight or in the early hours, presumably to reduce risk of detection.  

• Destruction and fire: Frequently, after the ATM is removed, the machinery is set on fire to destroy evidence. Walls, buildings, windows and security installations sustain heavy damage.  

• Escape with heavy loads: The ATMs themselves are bulky, heavy, built into strong structures. The thieves often need trailers, large vehicles, or modified vans to transport the machine. 

• Frequent in rural or less densely policed areas: Many of these incidents happen in towns, outskirts, or rural settings where response times might be slower.  

Impact

• Financial cost: The machines themselves can hold tens of thousands of pounds/euros. Removal, damage to property, structural repair, replacing ATMs — all these are expensive.  

• Community effect: For many people, ATMs are vital for access to cash, especially in areas with fewer banks. When machines are destroyed or removed, locals lose services.  

• Security concerns: These crimes pose risks not just to property, but to safety — risk of fire, structural collapse, confrontation. Also, they show a gap in preventative security for properties with ATMs.

Why This Tactic?

• High yield vs. simplicity: ATMs are cash-rich, so removing one may offer a big payoff. Using a digger allows brute force removal rather than picking locks, bypassing alarms, etc.

• Shock & speed: The visual spectacle of a digger ripping out a wall makes deterrence hard. If done fast enough, police response can be outrun.

• Low traceability: Stolen digger, burned machinery, masking – make it difficult to trace ownership or perpetrators directly.

Countermeasures & Response

Law enforcement agencies and businesses are responding in various ways:

• Surveillance / CCTV enhancement: Increased CCTV, both visible and covert, deter or help identify perpetrators.  

• Physical barriers: Reinforced walls, stronger ATM housing, anchoring machines hard enough that even heavy machinery struggles.

• Alarm systems: Shock sensors, break-in alarms that trigger on sudden force or drilling.

• Rapid mobile patrols in vulnerable areas, especially in rural zones.

• Community reporting: Encouraging locals to report suspicious heavy equipment movements at odd hours.

Cases Still Open & Legal Outcomes

• In many cases, arrests do occur — e.g., in Tewkesbury, two men were arrested.  

• In other cases, perpetrators escape, leaving behind burnt machinery or damaged building facades.

• Investigations may take time because forensic work (to identify digger origin, DNA, CCTV) is often hampered by the damage.

Conclusion

The use of heavy machinery — diggers, telehandlers — to extract ATMs from walls is a crime technique that embodies audacity, speed, and force. While intriguing in its cinematic quality, the cost to business owners, communities, and public infrastructure is serious. As these incidents continue, the balance will weigh on improving defensive measures, intelligence, and rapid response if law enforcement is to stay ahead.

Attached is a news article regarding robbers stealing a cash machine from nationwide with a digger 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-67611493.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Hundreds of Migrants Cross the Channel From France: A Growing Humanitarian, Political, and Security Challenge

In recent months, hundreds — and at times thousands — of migrants have been making the perilous journey across the English Channel from France to the UK in small boats. The issue has escalated to become one of the major migration challenges facing both nations, with serious implications for human rights, border enforcement, diplomacy, and local communities.

What the Numbers Show

• In 2024, over 36,800 people crossed the Channel this way. That was up about 25% compared to 2023, though still lower than the record 2022 level.  

• In the first half of 2025, numbers have risen sharply: nearly 20,000 migrants had made the journey by July, marking a nearly 50% increase on the same period in 2024.  

• Daily crossing records have also been broken: in one single day, 1,194 migrants in 18 boats crossed.  

Why the Crossings Are Increasing

Multiple factors contribute to the rising number of crossings:

1. Smuggling Networks: Organised people-smuggling gangs continue to exploit vulnerable people, capitalising on demand, desperation, and gaps in enforcement. Reports suggest these networks charge high prices for often dangerous or flimsy boats.  

2. Legal Routes & Asylum Process: Many people who make the crossing do so because they believe regular routes are inaccessible. The legal asylum system is perceived as lengthy, uncertain, or limited. Some migrants feel that risking the dangerous crossing is the only viable option.

3. Push Factors: Conflicts, persecution, poverty, instability in home countries, or unsafe transit through other regions all push people to seek safety and better lives.

4. Geographic & Seasonal Conditions: The English Channel is narrow in places, and weather conditions sometimes allow crossings. When conditions are calm, crossings increase. France and the UK both patrol coastal regions, but enforcement is not foolproof.

Risks & Human Cost

• Safety hazards are significant. Migrants frequently use small, unseaworthy boats, often overcrowded. Hypothermia, capsizing, drowning are real dangers.  

• Some crossings end in tragedy. There have been reports of deaths. In 2024, for example, French coastguard reports state that at least 77 people died during crossings.  

• The journey is difficult physically, mentally, and legally for many. Many migrants are traumatized by what they’ve been through — both before migration and during the crossing.

Political Responses & Policy Measures

The UK and France have taken several steps in response:

• In July 2025, the UK and France agreed a pilot deal to return illegal migrants who cross via small boats, while establishing legal routes to UK asylum or immigration for others. The idea is to discourage dangerous crossings and undermine smuggling operations.  

• The UK has introduced biometric tools and other enforcement upgrades. It is aiming to make border security more effective.  

• Legal challenges and human rights considerations complicate deportations and returns. For example, claims of trafficking or being a minor sometimes delay or block removal. Courts have, in several instances, temporarily blocked deportations under the UK-France deals.  

Humanitarian and Ethical Considerations

The debate isn’t just about numbers and security; there are serious humanitarian dimensions:

• Migrants are often fleeing human rights abuses, violence, or dire economic conditions. The principle of asylum is rooted in the idea that people have the right to seek protection.

• Safety concerns are moral as well as legal: ensuring that migrants are not exposed to danger is a shared responsibility. When crossings are made with inadequate boats or equipment, the risk of tragedy is high.

• International law, including refugee conventions, places obligations on countries to assess asylum claims fairly, to avoid return (“refoulement”) to places where the person might face harm, and to protect vulnerable people.

• Local communities, in both France and the UK, are affected — by the need for reception, processing, shelter, legal support; also by political tensions and public opinion.

Challenges & What’s at Stake

• Enforcement vs Human Rights: Striking the balance between securing borders and respecting international obligations is difficult. Overly harsh measures risk violating rights or pushing vulnerable people into more dangerous routes.

• Capacity & Costs: Monitoring, rescuing, processing asylum claims, providing temporary housing — all of this requires resources. Both countries face pressures on budgets, infrastructure, and public services.

• Diplomatic Relations: Cooperation between France and the UK is essential. Disagreements over responsibility, cost-sharing, operational tactics, and legal liabilities often strain bilateral relations.

• Smugglers adapting: As policies tighten in some areas, smugglers find new routes, new tactics, or enforce more dangerous crossings. Continuous adaptation is needed from law enforcement.

• Public Sentiment and Political Pressure: Migration is a politically sensitive issue. Governments are under pressure from voters to both control illegal migration and ensure that their responses are humane.

What Next

To address the crisis more effectively, several things could help:

1. Expansion of Safe and Legal Routes: Creating more accessible, transparent, and fair legal pathways for people wanting to seek asylum or resettle can reduce the demand for dangerous crossings.

2. Stronger Cooperation Franco-British and European-Wide: Coordinated patrols, shared intelligence, joint rescue operations, harmonised asylum procedures, and cost-sharing could improve outcomes.

3. Targeting Smuggling Networks: Disrupting the organisations that profit from human suffering via prosecution, financial tracking, and shutting down their communication channels.

4. Humanitarian Assistance in Transit States: Supporting migrants earlier in their journeys — in places where they stop, get stranded, or are forced to live in camps — can reduce desperation to cross illegally.

5. Clear Legal Frameworks that Uphold Rights: Ensuring that policies comply with domestic and international human rights laws, especially around vulnerable individuals (children, trafficking victims, etc.).

Conclusion

The flow of migrants crossing from France to the UK via small boats across the English Channel is more than just a migration issue: it is a humanitarian test, a challenge to border control, and a matter of international cooperation. The growing numbers set against tragic loss of life underline the urgency. Any long-term solution must combine effective policy, cross-border cooperation, and respect for human rights.

Attached is a news article regarding hundreds of migrants crossing the channel from France 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04qre9l0v3o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Amazon’s Zoox Robotaxi: Reinventing Urban Mobility

What Is Zoox?

Zoox is Amazon’s autonomous vehicle subsidiary, focused on building a purpose-built robotaxi rather than retrofitting existing cars. It designs electric, self-driving vehicles without steering wheels or pedals, aimed specifically at dense urban environments.  

Key Features & Design Highlights

• Bidirectional driving: The Zoox vehicle can drive in either direction, eliminating the need to turn around or reverse in tight spaces.  

• Four-wheel steering, enabling sharper turns and better maneuverability.  

• Seats for up to four passengers, with “carriage-style” face-to-face bench seating—designing for a passenger experience rather than driver control.  

• No driver controls (steering wheel, pedals).  

• Safety features: combination of cameras, radar, LiDAR sensors; customized airbag system; attention to eliminating blind spots (270-degree or similar sensor coverage).  

• Electric propulsion with significant uptime: in earlier disclosures, Zoox said a full charge could give up to ~16-hour operational time. 

Production Capacity & Expansion

• Zoox has opened a large production facility in Hayward, California. The size and setup are aimed to eventually produce up to 10,000 robotaxis per year.  

• Initial rollout cities: Las Vegas is the first major public deployment; San Francisco is planned soon; later Austin and Miami among other places.  

Public Launch & Operation

• In September 2025, Zoox officially launched its robotaxi service in Las Vegas.  

• Rides are currently free in the initial phase (promotional / testing / regulatory‐pending) for select locations along the Las Vegas Strip (Resorts World, AREA15, Topgolf, New York-New York, Luxor, etc.).  

• Passengers can request rides via the Zoox app (iOS & Android), subject to pickup/drop-off zones and geographic limitations.  

• Vehicles can carry up to four passengers, journeys are relatively short (up to ≈3 miles in some early operations).  

Challenges & Considerations

• Regulation: Zoox is waiting for regulatory approvals before moving to paid service in many jurisdictions.  

• Safety & reliability: As with all autonomous systems, ensuring safety in a wide variety of real-world conditions (“edge cases”) remains one of the biggest hurdles. Zoox has done many tests, but public usage raises new challenges.  

• Cost & scale: Building a fleet of purpose-built robotaxis (instead of modifying existing cars) is expensive. Reaching production at scale (10,000 per year) is ambitious and requires infrastructure, supply chains, and operational support.  

• User experience: Some feedback from early riders mentions comfort (e.g. seating, ride smoothness), especially given that the design is unlike traditional cars. Also, the service area is limited, so utility depends on geographic reach.  

Strategic Implications

• For Amazon: Zoox represents a long-term bet that autonomous ride-hailing / mobility-as-a-service will be a major transport paradigm. It complements Amazon’s broader interests in logistics, electrification, and last-mile innovations.  

• Competitive landscape: Zoox is going up against companies like Waymo (Alphabet) and Tesla, which have been active in robotaxi and autonomous mobility. What differentiates Zoox is the purpose-built nature of its vehicles and its design focus on passenger experience rather than driver control.  

• Urban mobility & environment: If successful, robotaxis like Zoox’s could reduce the number of private cars, reduce parking needs, and lower emissions (assuming electricity is sourced cleanly), while improving access to mobility. But much depends on regulatory, infrastructure, and public acceptance.

Outlook & What’s Next

• Zoox aims to roll out paid service in Las Vegas once regulatory approvals are secured.  

• Expansion into other cities is planned, especially San Francisco, followed by Austin & Miami.  

• Scaling production is key. The Hayward facility will be central to meeting demand. Reaching 10,000 units per year is projected, but will require maturation of supply, manufacturing systems, and quality control.  

• Continuous improvements in safety, perception, navigation in adverse weather or unusual conditions will be critical.

Conclusion

Amazon’s Zoox robotaxi marks a significant step forward in autonomous ride-hailing. With a purpose-built vehicle designed from scratch for passenger experience, and with full autonomy (no steering wheel/pedals), Zoox is pushing the envelope of what a robotaxi can look like. The free launch in Las Vegas is an important real-world test, and whether Zoox can scale, satisfy safety/regulatory requirements, and offer a reliable, cost-effective service will determine how big its impact becomes.

Attached is a news article regarding zoox Robotaxi 

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/amazons-zoox-robotaxi-opens-public-with-free-service-las-vegas-2025-09-10/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Line of Succession to the British Throne

The British monarchy remains one of the oldest and most recognised institutions in the world. At its heart lies a centuries-old system of hereditary succession, which determines who will ascend the throne after the reigning monarch. This process blends tradition with modern laws passed by Parliament, reflecting the evolving nature of the monarchy.

Current Monarch and Immediate Heirs

King Charles III acceded to the throne in September 2022 following the death of Queen Elizabeth II, who reigned for more than 70 years. As monarch, Charles serves as Head of State of the United Kingdom and 14 other Commonwealth realms.

The first in line is his eldest son, Prince William, the Prince of Wales. William is widely seen as the future face of the monarchy, having taken on greater public duties alongside his wife, Catherine, Princess of Wales. Their eldest child, Prince George of Wales, follows his father as second in line to the throne.

The line continues with George’s siblings: Princess Charlotte (third in line) and Prince Louis (fourth in line). This order reflects changes introduced by the Succession to the Crown Act 2013, which ended the centuries-old rule of male primogeniture. Previously, younger sons could leapfrog older sisters in the line of succession; now, birth order alone determines position.

Extended Line of Succession

After Prince Louis, the line moves to Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex (fifth in line), and his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet of Sussex (sixth and seventh in line respectively). Beyond them, the succession includes the descendants of Charles’s siblings, notably Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.

How the Rules Have Evolved

Succession to the British throne is governed by a combination of constitutional law and tradition. The Bill of Rights (1689), the Act of Settlement (1701), and the Royal Marriages Act (1772) once restricted succession largely to Protestant descendants of the Electress Sophia of Hanover. More recently, the 2013 Act removed the ban on heirs marrying Catholics and modernised several outdated provisions.

These reforms mean the monarchy reflects modern British values while still maintaining its unique continuity. Today, religion plays a much smaller role in determining eligibility, and gender no longer dictates precedence among siblings.

Why Succession Matters

The line of succession ensures a clear, stable transfer of power, safeguarding constitutional continuity during times of change. It also allows the public to see who will represent the Crown in the future, helping maintain the monarchy’s public profile and relevance.

Looking Ahead

As the monarchy adapts to a new era under King Charles III, the line of succession remains firmly rooted. Prince William and his children symbolise the next generations, offering a visible link between tradition and the future of the British Crown.

Attached is a news article regarding the royal succession family blood line 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-23272491.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

What is Meta Connect

Meta Connect is Meta’s (formerly Facebook’s) annual conference where it showcases its latest developments in AR/VR, AI, smart wearables, and mixed reality. It’s geared toward developers, hardware enthusiasts, creators, and anyone interested in the future of spatial computing — with hardware launches, software updates, prototyping reveals, and strategic positioning.

Key Highlights from Meta Connect 2025

Based on recent coverage, here are the major announcements, successes, and some issues from Meta Connect 2025:

Major Product & Tech Reveals

1. Smart Glasses Expansion

• ** Oakley Meta Vanguard**: a pair of smart glasses tailored for athletes. These include upgraded cameras, better durability (water resistance), real-time training stats via integrations with fitness platforms like Strava and Garmin.  

• Ray-Ban Display glasses (“Meta Ray-Ban Display”): These bring in a heads-up display (HUD) in the lens, allowing notifications, overlays like navigation, and more. They also work with a neural wristband to enable gesture controls. Priced at about US$799.  

• Upgraded Ray-Ban Gen-2 smart glasses, with better battery, improved comfort, upgraded cameras, and some new features.  

2. AI & Software Advances

• Meta also signalled it’s pushing more heavily into integrating AI into its devices and wearables. More natural voice/gesture interactions, better on-device and wearable integration.  

• In particular, the Ray-Ban Display glasses and the smart devices are using AI assistants, contextual overlays (e.g. what you’re seeing), real-time translation, etc.  

3. New Pricing Tiers & Target Markets

• The Oakley Vanguard comes in at about $499, which positions it more in a premium but somewhat accessible bracket for sports / active-wear tech users.  

• The high-end Ray-Ban Display glasses are significantly more expensive (≈ US$799), reflecting their added display/HUD tech and more advanced features.  

Challenges & Missteps

• There were some technical glitches during the demonstrations. For instance:

• The AI assistant in a Ray-Ban glasses cooking demo failed due to overload / unexpectedly triggering on many devices at once.  

• Another glitch: during a live video call demo with the Display glasses + neural wristband, the HUD “slept” right when a call came in, so the user couldn’t actually see the call notification.  

• Andrew Bosworth (Meta’s CTO) acknowledged these setbacks and said that the demos prevented the event from achieving “legendary status,” but reaffirmed that the products in question do work as intended when not under those stressful live conditions.  

Strategic Moves

• Meta is in talks with media companies (e.g. Axel Springer, Fox, News Corp) to license content for its AI tools. This signals that Meta is looking to secure legal and rich content to power its AI, rather than rely purely on scraped / user-generated content.  

• The leak prior to the announcement of the new smart glasses with display (Ray-Ban and Oakley models) suggests there’s a high level of anticipation and perhaps some tension in managing surprises.  

Implications & What to Watch

From this Connect, several implications for the tech landscape emerge, along with areas to observe going forward.

1. Wearables / AR is getting more serious

Meta is pushing AR glasses not just as fashion or novelty, but as devices with real, practical utility: notifications, translation, fitness, gesture control. The inclusion of displays and neural wristbands hints at a more interactive future.

2. User experience & reliability are still fragile

Live demos are always risky, but the demo failures highlight that when you introduce new hardware & new software, especially distributed hardware (like glasses being used by many people), synchronization, power, UI responsiveness, latency etc. still pose non-trivial engineering challenges.

3. Price remains a barrier

While some devices are priced in relatively accessible tiers, the flagship devices with displays and advanced feature sets remain expensive. Adoption will depend on how much value people perceive vs how much they are willing to spend.

4. Competition intensifies in AR / AI

Meta isn’t alone in pursuing smart glasses or AR wearables. The announcements show that Meta is seeking to assert leadership, but success will depend not just on hardware but also ecosystems (apps, content, developer tools), privacy/security, and comfort/usability.

5. Regulation, content licensing, and legal frameworks are more relevant

With licensing talks, with live content, and with AI assistants, Meta will need to deal with rights, content moderation, privacy, safety. How well it handles these will affect trust and adoption.

Conclusion

Meta Connect 2025 underscores Meta’s steady (if imperfect) march toward making AR/AI-wearable hybrids part of mainstream tech. It showed that the company is advancing its hardware, refining software experiences, and thinking seriously about ecosystems and content partnerships.

That said, some of the demos’ failures serve as a reminder: it’s still early days, and the smooth, seamless AR future many imagine still requires refinement.

Attached is a news article regarding met connect 

https://www.meta.com/en-gb/blog/connect-2025-day-one-keynote-ai-glasses-ray-ban-display-neural-band-metaverse-news/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Behind the Words: Trump, Starmer and the State Visit Press Conference

On 18 September 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer stood together at Chequers in a joint press conference that marked the culmination of Trump’s second state visit to the UK. What should have largely been a showcase of partnership instead revealed both policy alignments and sharp divergences, with moments of political theatre layered over deeper geopolitical and domestic stakes.

Shared Messages and Signals

There were several messages the two leaders wanted to emphasise together:

1. “Special relationship renewed”

Starmer said the deals announced—particularly in technology, nuclear energy, and AI—would “light up the special relationship for years to come.” Trump, in turn, praised the “priceless” ties between the UK and US.  

2. Big investment deals

The joint announcement of a new technology prosperity deal, which includes large commitments in AI, quantum computing, and civil nuclear cooperation, featured heavily. Starmer called this pact transformative.  

3. Global issues: Ukraine and Russian aggression

Both leaders made clear their concern over Russia’s war in Ukraine. Starmer emphasized that Putin is “not someone who wants peace,” citing attacks and violations. Trump, while expressing disappointment, also tried to lean on his own past relationship with Putin.  

Divergences and Disagreements

Despite the public show of unity, there were several issues on which Trump and Starmer either openly disagreed or where their positions diverged in tone, scope, or priority.

1. Palestinian State Recognition

One of the more pointed disagreements came over Sir Keir’s intention to formally recognise a Palestinian state, a move Trump opposed. Starmer framed recognition as part of a broader peace package involving hostages, humanitarian access, and a two-state solution.  

2. Immigration, “small boats”, and using the military

Trump urged Starmer to deploy the military if necessary to stem irregular migration—particularly via Channel crossings—warned that illegal migration could “destroy” countries from within. Starmer resisted that framing, insisting his government was already putting in place stricter controls and working with France to manage returns.  

3. Tone toward wind energy, oil and environmental policy

Trump took his usual stance, criticizing wind power as “a very expensive joke,” while praising North Sea oil. Starmer, on the other hand, defended more mixed or sustainable energy policies. This reflects a broader philosophical gap despite a shared interest in energy security.  

4. Free speech, domestic controversies, and diplomacy

The press conference touched on delicate issues: the sacking of Lord Peter Mandelson over emails with Jeffrey Epstein, Trump’s relationship or knowledge of him, and concerns about free speech, online regulation, and social media. Starmer defended UK protections for free speech while also drawing lines around extremist content and risks to children. Trump largely deflected on some of the domestic questions.  

Strategic Implications and Risks

Beyond the immediate arguments, several strategic implications emerge from what was said (and what was not said) in the press conference.

• Domestic politics: Starmer uses this event to burnish his credentials: delivering foreign investment, standing firm in foreign policy, and managing a difficult guest. For Trump, the visit helps shore up his international profile and appeal to allies, while also reinforcing his tough stance on immigration and law and order.

• Foreign policy balancing act: On Ukraine, Gaza, and Palestine, Starmer appears to be trying to balance alignment with allies (including the U.S.) while asserting his own country’s values and policies. Trump’s disagreement over Palestinian statehood, while expected, shows that U.K.–U.S. alignment has sharp limits.

• Public perception & reputation: Trump’s comments about using the military to stop illegal migration, his dismissiveness of wind energy, and his handling of Epstein-related questions may reinforce criticisms from his opponents. For Starmer, there are risks too: pressure from both left and right—labour activists concerned about immigration rhetoric, environmentalists alarmed by energy policy shifts, and human rights advocates over Gaza/Palestine.

• The long game for UK-US tech cooperation: The investment and tech deal announcements are significant; they hint at a willingness by the UK to align with the U.S. in future-oriented sectors. But actual implementation, regulation (especially around AI), ethics, and trade balance will matter.

Key Quotes

• Trump: “He’s let me down” (on Vladimir Putin) — an indicator of disappointment about unresolved conflict in Ukraine despite prior expectations.  

• Starmer: “Part of an overall package … a safe and secure Israel and a viable Palestinian state” — his framing of managing recognition of Palestine together with peace process goals.  

• Trump: urging Starmer to use “military … doesn’t matter what means you use — it destroys countries from within.”  

What Was Left Unsaid

• Specifics of implementation: On many agreements (e.g. tech, AI, nuclear power), details are thin. How regulation, oversight, benefits to local communities, transparency etc., will be handled remains unclear.

• Domestic backlash potentials: While Trump’s visit was mostly smooth, some remarks (especially on migration or energy policy) could stir opposition.

• Deeper alignment on climate policy: The differences in energy policy suggest this will continue to be a fault line.

Conclusion

The Trump-Starmer press conference was, in many ways, a balancing act. On one hand, it underscored the shared interests between the U.S. and UK — in technology, security, and geopolitics. On the other, it exposed clear fault lines: over migration, over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and over energy and environmental policy.

For Starmer, the event was an opportunity to showcase Britain as a serious partner—able to attract investment, defend its values, but also to disagree where needed. For Trump, it was a stage to reaffirm his core rhetorical pillars (immigration, strength, making deals) while also navigating the expectations of being a state visitor abroad.

How much this press conference changes policy—or just provides political theatre—will depend on follow-through: legislation, investment flows, international cooperation, and how domestic audiences respond to the exchanges.

Attached is a news article regarding trump and starmer press conference 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cre5nylyzd4o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Donald Trump Lays Wreath at Queen’s Tomb: A Gesture of Respect and Diplomacy

What Happened

• As part of his second state visit to the United Kingdom, U.S. President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump visited St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle. During this visit, they quietly laid a wreath at the tomb of the late Queen Elizabeth II.  

• The ceremony was private, lasting around ten minutes. Alongside the wreath-laying, the Trumps were shown around parts of the chapel, heard a choir performance, and the president emerged from the chapel calling the visit a “great honour”.  

The Setting / Background

• St George’s Chapel is the burial place of Queen Elizabeth II, who passed away in September 2022. It’s a site of high symbolic importance—royal, historic, and religious.  

• This wreath-laying comes as part of a broader itinerary during the state visit, which involves formal meetings with the British Royal Family (including King Charles III and Queen Camilla), ceremonial honors, and diplomatic and economic discussions.  

Statements & Tone

• President Trump described paying respects at the tomb as a “great honour”.  

• The atmosphere appeared solemn and respectful; the visit was private, with minimal public fanfare during the tomb portion.  

Reactions & Implications

• Diplomatic gesture: Laying a wreath at the tomb of a monarch is a strong symbolic act. It is one way for a visiting head of state to show respect for the history and traditions of the host country, recognizing both cultural memory and continuity.

• Public and media response: Media outlets have reported this event as part of the more formal, ceremonial component of Trump’s UK visit. Some coverage focuses on how it fits into broader Anglo-American relations; others reflect on how the British public perceives Trump (“controversial,” “polarizing”) and whether such gestures meaningfully bridge differences.  

Significance

• Symbolic value: Respecting the monarchy and acknowledging the legacy of Queen Elizabeth II can be seen as important in maintaining good will, especially as monarchies remain a deeply embedded part of the UK’s institutional and cultural life.

• Political optics: Trump’s state visits are often as much about optics and public diplomacy as about policymaking. A respectful, dignified act like laying a wreath helps cultivate an image of decorum and can soften criticism, particularly in the UK where some public opinion is critical of him.

• Historical precedent: State visits often involve such gestures. They are part of established protocol. Laying wreaths, visiting tombs, paying tribute—these are traditional ways for foreign leaders to show respect. This act places Trump within that tradition.

Criticisms / Skepticism

• Some may view such ceremonies as largely symbolic, with limited practical impact on deeper political or policy issues.

• Given Trump’s often combative style and controversial policies, especially those that have polarized international opinion, there may be skepticism that symbolism alone can mitigate broader concerns (on trade, human rights, foreign policy, etc.).

• Also, moments like these are scrutinized for sincerity—critics might ask: is this genuine respect, or is it part of managing public perception.,

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s wreath-laying at the tomb of Queen Elizabeth II was a meaningful ceremonial gesture, rich in symbolic import. It underlines the enduring importance of tradition, respect, and ritual in diplomatic relations. While the act alone cannot resolve political tension or redefine international policy, it plays a role in the broader theatre of diplomacy—helping to set a tone, show continuity, and perhaps ease some of the friction that comes with high-profile state visits.

Attached is a news article regarding Donald Trump laying a wreath on queens grave 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjedxl0qxyjo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Clash of Legacies Reignited

The Benn–Eubank rivalry isn’t just about the fighters; it’s steeped in family history. Thirty-five years ago, their fathers — Nigel Benn and Chris Eubank Sr — engaged in one of the most brutal and storied rivalries in British boxing. That legacy has carried over with both sons stepping into the same ring, not just to fight each other, but to defend and challenge a heritage.  

On April 26, 2025, at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, Chris Eubank Jr took a unanimous decision win over Conor Benn in a 12-round war. Judges scored it 116-112 across the board. It was a tough fight; Benn, despite moving up in weight, landed some heavy shots, and put pressure, but ultimately was edged out.  

What Went Wrong (for Benn), & What Eubank Achieved

For Benn:

• Moving up to middleweight (from welterweight) brought challenges – discretionary power, weight, stamina, and handling a physically bigger opponent.  

• Emotions ran high. Benn has himself admitted that he let his heart lead the fight in ways that may have cost him in terms of strategy. Over-aggression, or loss of composure in rounds where more discipline might have helped.  

• Close but not close enough: While some observers felt Benn had rounds in him, the judges saw it differently. The 116-112 scorecards show that Eubank Jr managed to control enough of the fight, especially in the later rounds.  

For Eubank Jr:

• He proved resilience — surviving dangerous moments (notably Benn had him hurt in rounds) and closing out strong. Stamina, ring IQ, and conditioning were crucial.  

• Showed psychological toughness: Benn came out aggressive, possibly thinking Benn could overwhelm him early; Eubank weathered that and stuck to his plan.  

• Kept the family name in strong light. Given the historic rivalry, there was more than just a win on the line — legacy, reputation, momentum.  

The Rematch: What’s New, What’s at Stake

Date & Venue

• The rematch is set for November 15, 2025, once again at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in North London.  

• It’s being billed under the title “Unfinished Business.”  

Training & Strategy Adjustments

• Eubank Jr is bringing back Brian “BoMac” McIntyre — known for training Terence Crawford to undisputed super-middleweight success. McIntyre is expected to sharpen Eubank’s game, particularly in the later rounds and around stamina and punch output.  

• Benn has publicly said he intends to be more controlled this time — fighting with his head rather than purely with emotion. Managing emotions, being less reactive, picking shots more wisely, and pacing himself better are key areas he says he’s working on.  

Weight, Rules & Conditions

• One of the big talking points from the first fight was the weight cut and related conditions. Eubank Jr missed the middleweight limit by a tiny margin, was fined heavily, and there were rehydration clauses. Concerns were raised about how much this affected his performance and health.  

• There’s pressure from Eubank’s side (and his team) to adjust or reconsider these weight-conditions, to avoid risking fighter safety. Whether that happens is something to watch.  

Psychological and Promotional Narrative

• Benn has admitted he “didn’t like” Eubank Jr, but that “spite” isn’t quite the same going into the rematch. The first fight had huge emotional tension – they both say there is less of that intensity now, though it remains a deeply personal contest.  

• Eubank Jr is making allegations of wrongdoing (sabotage) against Benn’s team and Matchroom Boxing / Eddie Hearn, including claims around weigh-in manipulation, blocking an ambulance, biased officiating. These are serious charges and have stirred controversy.  

• Benn, for his part, seems focused on turning the narrative of “what could have been” into “what will be,” with more discipline and sharper execution.  

Predictions & What’s On the Line

For Benn:

• Redemption: A win would erase doubts, re-launch his trajectory, and prove he can beat a seasoned rival under pressure.

• Legacy & Titles: He still has a younger age, speed, explosiveness. Beating Eubank Jr cleanly could open doors to world title shots at his natural weight.  

For Eubank Jr:

• Cementing place: He’s already got the win, but another could put him in talks with even bigger names, and perhaps crack open more lucrative fights.

• Health & wear: Age and the punitive weight cut process remain relevant issues; another gruelling fight could take a physical toll. He’s got more to lose in some respects—if the rematch goes wrong, it could dent his momentum more than Benn’s.  

What To Watch For

• How well Benn manages his composure: can he keep his aggression in check and get more tactical, particularly in middle rounds?

• Whether weight and rehydration conditions are adjusted (if at all), and how that affects Eubank Jr’s physical performance.

• The work that “BoMac” McIntyre does in Eubank Jr’s corner — can he help correct past weaknesses (if any) in stamina, punch accuracy, or pacing?

• The psychological build-up: how much the accusations, promos, press conferences affect both fighters’ mindset. Boxing is often half mental.

• Judges’ scoring: since the first fight had somewhat wide unanimous scores, there’ll likely be scrutiny again if Benn seems close in rounds but loses narrowly.

Conclusion

The rematch between Conor Benn and Chris Eubank Jr isn’t just another fight — it’s more personal, more consequential, and more anticipated because of the first encounter. For Benn, it’s a chance at redemption and to show growth; for Eubank Jr, it’s about solidifying his win and keeping bigger opportunities alive.

If both men bring what they say they have been working on — better discipline, adjustments in strategy, sharp preparation — we could be in for an even more closely fought, tactical, perhaps less explosive but more chess-like match than the first. But given how passionate they both are, and how much is on the line, drama is all but guaranteed.

Attached is a news article regarding Chris Eubanks vs Conner benn rematch 

https://ringmagazine.com/en/news/chris-eubank-jr-launches-scathing-attack-on-british-boxing-board-of-control

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

A Royal Spectacle at Windsor: Trump’s State Visit Begins in Pageantry and Protest

Windsor, England — Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States, began his second official state visit to the United Kingdom today, greeted at Windsor Castle with a blend of regal ceremony, diplomatic symbolism, and public dissent. King Charles III, Queen Camilla, Prince William, and Catherine, Princess of Wales, played host in a display of pageantry intended to signal the strength of the UK–US relationship even as critics voiced reservations at home.

A Grand Welcome: Ceremony and Display

The welcome unfolded in multiple stages:

• Arrival and Greeting: President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump landed via helicopter in the royal estate’s private walled garden. They were met by Prince William and Princess Catherine. Shortly afterwards, the royals, including King Charles and Queen Camilla, joined them to officially receive the president.  

• Military Honors and Parade: The ceremonial reception featured military honors of an unusually large scale. Troops in red and gold, mounted regiments, bands, a guard of honor inspection, and a carriage procession made up the spectacle. According to reports, more than 1,300 service personnel and about 120 horses participated.  

• Royal Carriage Procession: After the arrival and greetings, Trump and King Charles rode together in the Royal Irish State Coach as part of the carriage procession through the grounds. Queen Camilla accompanied Melania Trump in another carriage.  

• Inspections and Conversation: Upon entering the castle quadrangle, Trump inspected the guard of honor alongside King Charles. There was visible warmth in their interactions, including friendly exchanges and moments of informality. Protocol was observed, with King Charles gesturing for Trump to take certain ceremonial positions.  

Symbolism, Artifacts, and Tribute

Beyond the visual spectacle, several symbolic gestures underlined the historic and diplomatic import of the visit:

• Trump and Melania took a private tour of St George’s Chapel in Windsor, where they laid a wreath at the tomb of the late Queen Elizabeth II, paying tribute to the monarch’s long service.  

• A display of artifacts from the UK’s Royal Collection focused on Anglo-American history was shown in the Green Drawing Room. Clinton’s independence-era correspondence and items related to U.S.–UK relations drew visible interest from President Trump, who reportedly exclaimed “Wow” upon seeing some items.  

• Gifts were exchanged: King Charles and Queen Camilla presented Trump with a leather-bound volume celebrating the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and other commemorative items; Trump in turn offered a symbolic sword modeled on one used by President Dwight D. Eisenhower.  

Political Stakes and Public Dissent

While ceremonial pomp dominated the visual narrative, there were undercurrents of political tension and public scrutiny:

• Protests and Opposition: Thousands of protesters gathered in London under banners organized by groups such as the “Stop Trump Coalition,” expressing concerns over Trump’s policies, associations (including controversies surrounding Jeffrey Epstein), and what some see as the UK’s awkward balancing act in hosting a polarizing figure.  

• Security Measures: The event was tightly secured. Airspace restrictions around Windsor, arrests made after images of Trump and Epstein were projected onto a castle tower, heavy policing, and various ceremonial safety preparations were in place.  

• Diplomatic Balancing: The UK government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, aims to use the visit to shore up trade, tech investment, and defense cooperation with the U.S. However, there are questions over how to reconcile support from certain sectors of the populace with disquiet among others.  

What This Visit Represents

• This marks the first time a U.S. president is being given a second full state visit to the UK. The precedent-breaking nature of the invitation signals both the UK’s willingness to engage with Trump despite controversy and its desire to leverage soft power and tradition.  

• For King Charles III, dealing with issues such as his health, public opinion of the monarchy, and Britain’s international standing, the visit offers an opportunity to project stability and relevance.  

• For Trump, this is a chance to strengthen international relationships, particularly with the U.K., in a geopolitical environment shaped by concerns over trade, defense, and global alliances.  

Conclusion

The parade and welcome for President Donald Trump at Windsor Castle today illustrated a vivid tableau of monarchy, statecraft, and public debate. King Charles III and Queen Camilla, alongside Prince William and Princess Catherine, played central roles in the ceremonial choreography: from processions and horse-drawn carriages to state banquets, honor guards, and tribute ceremonies. Yet even the most lavish display could not entirely mute dissent, neither from protesters nor from the wider public unease about some of the issues shadowing this historic state visit.

This event is more than pomp: it is a reflection of how tradition continues to shape diplomatic relations, how symbolism is wielded in statecraft, and how leaders must walk a narrow path between spectacle and scrutiny.

Attached is a news article regarding trump state visit 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9jyzl4532o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561