Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Sleeping Late Could Shorten Your Life, New Research Warns

A growing body of research suggests that being a “night owl” — someone who regularly stays up late and sleeps in — could increase the risk of dying earlier than those who rise and rest with the sun. Scientists say that the habit of going to bed late disrupts the body’s natural rhythm, leading to serious long-term health consequences.

According to a study published in the Chronobiology International Journal, people who consistently sleep late are up to 10% more likely to die prematurely compared to early risers. The findings are based on data collected over several years, examining sleep patterns, health conditions, and mortality rates among thousands of adults.

Experts believe the reason lies in the body’s internal “clock,” or circadian rhythm, which governs the sleep-wake cycle. When individuals go against this natural rhythm — staying awake at night and sleeping late into the morning — it can lead to chronic sleep deprivation, hormone imbalances, and elevated stress levels. Over time, this disruption increases the risk of heart disease, diabetes, depression, and stroke.

Dr. Karen O’Reilly, a sleep researcher at the University of Oxford, explains:

“Our bodies are programmed to follow light and darkness. When we ignore those signals by staying up until 2 or 3 a.m., we throw off critical biological functions — everything from blood sugar regulation to brain activity.”

Lifestyle factors also play a role. Night owls are more likely to engage in unhealthy late-night habits such as snacking, drinking alcohol, or excessive screen time — all of which can compound health risks.

However, experts say change is possible. Gradually adjusting bedtime by 15 to 30 minutes earlier each night, limiting caffeine intake after midday, and avoiding bright screens before bed can help reset the body’s internal clock. Exposure to natural sunlight in the morning is also a simple yet powerful way to encourage healthier sleep timing.

While some may naturally prefer the quiet of late nights, researchers warn that ignoring your body’s natural cues could come with a heavy price. As Dr. O’Reilly adds,

“Sleep is not just about rest — it’s one of the most important predictors of long-term health. How and when you sleep can literally determine how long you live.”

Attached is a news article regarding people who sleep late are at risk of dying early 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-43711631.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Big Headlines — and What They Actually Mean

Media outlets across the world ran attention-grabbing stories with headlines like: “Ireland will pay you $90,000 to start fresh on a quiet island.” In reality, the situation is more nuanced. The scheme behind those headlines is genuine — but it isn’t a free relocation payment.  

What is the scheme

Our Living Islands is a policy introduced in 2023 by Ireland’s Department of Rural and Community Development aimed at revitalising the remote, offshore islands of Ireland that have experienced population decline.  

As part of that, there is a refurbishment grant scheme which offers up to €84,000 (≈ US $90,000) for eligible vacant or derelict properties on certain islands.  

What the grant is, and what it is not

• It is: A government grant intended only for the refurbishment of a vacant or derelict home on one of the qualifying islands.  

• It is not: A payment simply for moving to the island, buying property, or using it as a holiday home.  

• The property must be used as the applicant’s main residence, not a holiday let.  

• Applicants must already have the right to live in Ireland, meaning it’s not a ready-made visa/immigration route.  

Who is eligible

• The property must be located on one of the designated offshore islands (those with no bridge/land link to the mainland).  

• It must have been vacant for at least two years and built before a certain date (often pre-1993) to qualify as “derelict” for the larger grant.  

• Grant amounts differ based on condition: up to around €50,000 for a typical vacant home; up to €84,000 for a derelict one requiring major works.  

Why Ireland Is Doing This

Many of Ireland’s offshore islands have suffered from population decline, especially among younger residents, as jobs, transport, and services have become more challenging. The policy aims to:

• Sustain vibrant island communities by encouraging people to live permanently rather than holiday-ing.

• Put vacant/derelict properties back into use instead of them becoming derelict ruins.

• Support broader infrastructure and service improvements on those islands (housing, broadband, transport) as part of the 10-year plan.  

In short: it’s not just about giving people a dreamy island life, it’s about reviving and sustaining small communities that face risk of disappearing.

The Reality — What to Consider

If you’re thinking: “Great – a beautiful Irish island, ocean views, quiet life, €84k grant!” — here are some practical realities:

The positives

• You could get substantial support to refurbish an old home (if you meet the criteria).

• The setting: remote, scenic, peaceful — a very different pace of life.

• For someone working remotely or running a location-independent business, this could be a genuine lifestyle change.

• Being part of a smaller, community-oriented place can be rewarding in ways big city life isn’t.

 The trade-offs & challenges

• The grant only covers refurbishment: you still need to buy or own the property, pump in the funds for works, manage logistics.  

• On remote islands: logistics, transport, weather and service access (shops, healthcare, schools) can be far more challenging than mainland life.  

• Just because a headline says “£70,000” or “$90,000” doesn’t mean that covers everything or that life is easy. People on those islands talk of ferry costs, higher supplier costs, isolation, weather disruptions.  

• You must commit to using the home as your primary residence, so this is more a lifestyle decision, not a speculative investment or holiday home.  

• The number of applicants so far has been relatively small — indicating that the scheme, while headline-grabbing, may be less straightforward than it sounds.  

So — Is It “Free Money to Move to a Quiet Island”

No — not exactly. The headline “Ireland will pay you 90k to move to a quiet island” is misleading, though rooted in a real government scheme. The nuance is:

• The money is for refurbishing homes, not for relocation only.

• You must meet many eligibility criteria (ownership or buying the property; rights to reside; main residence; property condition).

• It’s a long-term commitment to live on the island, not just a vacation.

• It’s about reviving communities — the government is not paying people simply to move.  

Final Thoughts

If you’re drawn to the idea of island life off Ireland’s wild coastline — dramatic cliffs, sea-spray, a strong sense of community — this scheme could represent an exciting opportunity. But treat it as a serious lifestyle & property project, not a casual relocation with a cheque attached.

You’ll need:

• The legal right to live in Ireland.

• The financial means to purchase (if buying) and refurbish a property.

• A willingness to embrace the challenges of remote living (transport, weather, services).

• The mindset of being part of a small community, rather than simply finding a holiday home.

Attached is a news article regarding Ireland paying people to move to a island for 90k 

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/ireland-92000-to-move-to-remote-islands-heres-how-it-works/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

A Remarkable Discovery Off the Coast of Costa Rica

In the waters off the Caribbean coast of Tortuguero National Park in Costa Rica, marine scientists and anglers have recorded a truly extraordinary sight — a bright orange shark with ghost-white eyes. Belonging to the species Nurse Shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum), this individual stunned observers by exhibiting a rare pigmentation anomaly.  

The Encounter

During a sport-fishing trip near Tortuguero, at a depth of about 37 metres, anglers hooked a nurse shark measuring approximately 2 metres (around 6.5 feet) in length. Rather than the typical grey-brown or yellow-brown colouring of the species, this shark’s skin glowed a vivid orange-gold, and its eyes appeared white – lacking the usual dark irises. The shark was photographed and then released back into the sea.  

What’s Behind the Colour

The unusual appearance is thought to be caused by xanthism (also spelled xanthochroism) — a pigment disorder in which yellow and gold hues become unusually prominent because darker pigments are lacking or suppressed.  

In this case, researchers also observed features suggestive of albinism, such as the white eyes, which together point to what the study refers to as “albino-xanthochromism”. That is, a double anomaly: both excess yellow-gold pigment (xanthism) and diminished melanin (albinism).  

Why It Matters

• This is the first scientifically documented case of full-body xanthism in a cartilaginous fish (sharks, rays, skates) in the Caribbean Sea — and the first such case for the nurse shark species globally.  

• It challenges assumptions about pigment anomalies in marine animals: despite its vivid colouring (which would normally increase visibility to predators or reduce camouflage), this individual appears to have matured into adulthood.  

• It raises questions about genetic and environmental factors in shark populations: How did this individual come about? Is this a one-off mutation, or is there something in the local environment or population genetics that enables or tolerates such anomalies. 

Biological & Ecological Considerations

• The nurse shark is typically a bottom-dwelling species, often found in tropical shallow waters, crevices and reefs, feeding on molluscs, crustaceans and small fish.

• Having typical brown/grey colouring helps them blend into their habitat. Thus a vivid orange-gold colour is highly unusual and may increase vulnerability. Yet this one survived long enough to reach large size, suggesting resilience.

• The discovery does not indicate a new species — the shark was identified as a typical nurse shark, with the difference being in its pigment.

• Scientists note that while xanthism is usually presumed to reduce survival (due to visibility, UV exposure etc.), individual outcomes can vary.  

Implications & Future Directions

• The find is a call to further investigate the genetic diversity of shark populations in the Caribbean region — especially for anomalies and their frequency.

• It underscores the value of sport-fishing tourism and photographic documentation in contributing to marine biodiversity records.

• It also highlights the need for shark conservation: even well-known species can surprise us, and protecting their habitats ensures such unique individuals have a chance to live.

• With climate change, habitat stress, changing water temperatures and other pressures, scientists will want to monitor whether pigment anomalies increase or whether this remains a rare curiosity.  

A Visual Wonder

To many observers, the image of a glowing orange shark with white eyes might seem more like a creature of fantasy than of familiar marine life. For those in the marine-biology community, however, it is a vivid reminder of how much is still to learn beneath the waves.

Attached is a news article regarding a orange shark ground of the coast of Costa Rica 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/rare-bright-orange-nurse-shark-xanthism-costa-rica-b2811468.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Immigrants Must Now Pass A-Level English to Stay in the UK Under New Government Rules

In a bold and controversial move, the UK government has announced that immigrants will soon be required to achieve an A-Level standard qualification in English in order to be eligible to remain in the country. The new policy, part of an immigration reform package aimed at tightening residency criteria, has sparked fierce debate among politicians, educators, and advocacy groups.

Under the proposed changes, all long-term visa holders and applicants for permanent residency will need to demonstrate A-Level proficiency in English language skills — reading, writing, and communication — rather than the current minimum requirement of a B1 or B2 level on the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR).

Government Rationale

According to the Home Office, the new rule is designed to “ensure that all residents contribute fully to British society and the economy.” Officials claim that a higher standard of English will help improve integration, reduce reliance on interpreters in public services, and enhance job prospects for migrants.

Home Secretary James Cleverly said in a statement:

“For too long, language barriers have stood in the way of true integration. Those who wish to build a life here must be able to communicate at a level that reflects our national standards. This is not about exclusion — it’s about opportunity and cohesion.”

Impact on Immigrants

The announcement has caused concern among immigrant communities and human rights groups, who argue that the policy could unfairly penalise individuals from non-English speaking backgrounds, particularly older migrants or those working in manual labour sectors.

Amira Khan, spokesperson for the Refugee Council, criticised the policy, saying:

“Requiring A-Level English is excessive and unrealistic for many hard-working individuals who contribute enormously to our society. Language learning takes time, and such a high threshold risks pushing skilled and valuable workers out of the country.”

Language schools and testing centres are also expected to see a surge in demand as immigrants scramble to meet the new criteria. Experts predict that preparation courses could cost thousands of pounds, putting additional financial pressure on those already struggling with living expenses.

Education and Testing

The A-Level English qualification represents an advanced standard — typically achieved by students aged 17–18 in the UK — involving complex grammar, analytical essay writing, and comprehension of literary texts. Critics say it is an unreasonable benchmark for individuals whose first language is not English, particularly those in technical or trade occupations.

However, government ministers insist there will be “pathways and support programmes” to help migrants reach the required level, including free online classes and subsidised testing for low-income applicants.

Public Reaction

Public opinion on the measure is divided. Some British citizens view it as a necessary step to maintain social cohesion and raise standards, while others see it as another attempt to deter immigration through unrealistic barriers.

In major cities such as London, Birmingham, and Manchester — where multicultural communities thrive — the announcement has drawn protests and calls for the policy to be reconsidered.

Looking Ahead

If passed in Parliament, the new English language rule could come into effect as early as 2026, applying to both new visa applicants and those renewing long-term residency permits.

While the government insists that the measure promotes integration and equality, opponents warn that it could instead widen social divides, discourage skilled migration, and strain relations between the UK and countries supplying key workers in healthcare, construction, and education.

As the debate intensifies, one thing is clear: the role of language in defining national identity — and belonging — has never been more contentious.

Attached is a news article regarding passing an A level to be considered ok to live in the uk 

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/migrants-will-be-required-to-pass-a-level-standard-of-english

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

China’s Spectacular Mass Drone Show Lights Up the Sky on New Year’s Eve

As the clock struck midnight to welcome the New Year, China once again demonstrated its mastery of technology and artistry with a breathtaking mass drone show that illuminated the skies across several major cities. From Shanghai’s Bund to Beijing’s Olympic Park, tens of thousands of synchronized drones painted dazzling images above crowds of spectators, blending innovation, culture, and celebration into one mesmerizing display.

The event marked one of the largest coordinated drone shows in history, with more than 30,000 drones taking flight nationwide. Each device was equipped with bright LED lights capable of forming intricate animations — from dragons soaring through the clouds to countdown timers and traditional Chinese symbols of luck and prosperity.

Unlike traditional fireworks, which have long been associated with New Year festivities, the drone shows were eco-friendly and silent, representing a modern shift towards sustainable celebration. Organizers emphasized that these high-tech displays not only reduce air pollution and noise but also showcase China’s growing dominance in aerospace, AI, and light technology.

In Shanghai, the highlight of the evening came as drones formed a colossal “2026” figure over the Huangpu River, followed by a glowing phoenix — a symbol of rebirth and hope. In Beijing, the drones created lifelike images of famous landmarks and cultural icons, including the Great Wall and giant red lanterns drifting across the night sky.

Crowds of spectators captured the scenes on their smartphones, flooding social media platforms like Weibo and Douyin with awe-struck reactions. One viewer wrote, “It’s like watching the future unfold — no smoke, no noise, just pure magic.”

The Ministry of Culture and Tourism praised the event as a “model of modern celebration,” noting that the drone performances highlight China’s ability to combine tradition with cutting-edge technology. Similar shows were also held in Shenzhen, Chengdu, and Guangzhou, each customized with regional themes and cultural motifs.

Experts predict that drone displays will soon become a fixture in public celebrations worldwide. As one technology analyst put it, “China isn’t just lighting up the sky — it’s lighting the way forward for how we celebrate in the 21st century.”

With this awe-inspiring spectacle, China welcomed the New Year not with explosions of sound, but with a symphony of light and innovation — a vision of harmony between culture, environment, and technology.

Attached is a news article regarding china drone launch that lights up the sky like New Year’s Eve 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/32561971/new-years-fireworks-china-uae-drones/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Scientists Stunned as New Research Confirms Earth Has Two Moons

In a groundbreaking discovery that’s sending shockwaves through the scientific community, astronomers have confirmed that Earth is not alone in its lunar orbit — it has a second, much smaller “moon.”

For decades, the existence of a second natural satellite orbiting Earth has been debated. While the familiar full moon has always dominated our night skies, researchers have now verified that a smaller companion — a quasi-moon — has been orbiting our planet for years without detection by the general public.

The Discovery

The revelation comes from a team of astronomers working with NASA’s Near-Earth Object Observation program. Using data from high-powered telescopes in Hawaii and Chile, scientists confirmed that a small asteroid, officially named 2023 HO3, has been locked in Earth’s gravitational pull. Though not a true moon in the same sense as the larger lunar body, it is considered a “quasi-satellite” — an object that circles the Sun in sync with Earth, appearing to orbit our planet.

Dr. Jennifer Mullins, an astrophysicist involved in the research, explained:

“It doesn’t orbit Earth in the same tight path as our primary moon, but it’s been dancing around us for centuries. Its motion is gravitationally bound to Earth, making it, in a real sense, our second moon.”

How It Works

Unlike the main moon, which completes a stable orbit roughly every 27 days, 2023 HO3 moves in a looping pattern that keeps it relatively close to Earth as both travel around the Sun. The object measures between 50 and 100 meters in diameter — about the size of a large building — and is located approximately 38 times farther away than our main moon at its furthest point.

Astronomers say the quasi-moon never strays too far from Earth, oscillating between 14 million and 40 million kilometers away as it follows its stable path.

A Long-Held Mystery

Hints of a second moon have existed since the 19th century. Early astronomers occasionally reported sightings of “mysterious objects” near Earth’s orbit, but without modern technology, these claims were dismissed as errors or optical illusions.

Now, with the aid of modern telescopic imaging and orbital simulations, the mystery has finally been solved.

Implications for Science

The discovery opens new opportunities for space research. Because 2023 HO3 remains in a relatively steady orbit, NASA scientists say it could serve as a potential target for future missions — possibly even as a test site for asteroid mining or space base construction.

“This changes the way we think about Earth’s immediate cosmic neighborhood,” said Dr. Mullins. “We’ve always looked at the Moon as our single companion, but in truth, Earth has had a hidden partner all along.”

The Future of Lunar Exploration

Plans are already underway to send an unmanned probe to study the quasi-moon more closely within the next decade. If successful, the mission could help scientists better understand how such objects form — and whether other planets might also have unseen companions orbiting alongside them.

For now, Earth’s second moon remains invisible to the naked eye, but scientists say it serves as a reminder of how much we still have to discover about our own cosmic backyard.

Attached is a news article regarding the earth has two moons confirm by scientists 

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/earth-now-has-two-moons-at-least-until-2083-and-nasa-confirms-it/amp_articleshow/124714781.cms

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Louis Vuitton under Investigation for Money Laundering in the Netherlands

Overview

French luxury fashion brand Louis Vuitton has been placed under formal suspicion by the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM) in a money-laundering investigation centred on its Dutch operations. According to prosecutors, roughly €3 million of criminal proceeds were allegedly laundered through purchases at Louis Vuitton stores in the Netherlands between 2021 and 2023.  

The Alleged Scheme

How it reportedly worked

• A Chinese national, identified as Bei W., living in Lelystad (Netherlands) is at the centre of the case. Between September 2021 and February 2023, she is alleged to have purchased luxury goods from Louis Vuitton’s Dutch stores using large cash payments.  

• The purchases were structured so that no single transaction exceeded €10,000, which is the threshold above which Dutch anti-money-laundering rules trigger mandatory reporting.  

• Items purchased included designer bags and clothing. Many were reportedly shipped to China and Hong Kong, as part of the so-called daigou system — where goods are bought abroad and sent back to Asia to avoid import duties.  

• The OM alleges that a Louis Vuitton store employee may have assisted the purchaser by alerting her to new item releases and helping keep each transaction just below the reporting threshold.  

Allegations against Louis Vuitton

• The investigation centres not just on the purchaser but on whether Louis Vuitton’s Dutch operations failed to implement adequate anti-money-laundering controls — specifically:

• Not verifying customer identity when they should have;  

• Failing to raise suspicion when multiple high-value cash transactions occurred;  

• According to the OM, by allowing such transactions without stronger checks, Louis Vuitton may have facilitated the laundering of criminal proceeds.  

Legal & Regulatory Status

• As of now, Louis Vuitton’s Dutch entity has been officially named a suspect in the money-laundering investigation.  

• However:

• It is unclear whether formal criminal charges will be brought against the company.  

• The process is ongoing, and any legal conclusion may take time.  

• Separately, in Sweden the brand was fined ≈€440,000 (≈5 million SEK) after authorities found that a customer made multiple large cash payments in breach of the Swedish Money Laundering Act.  

Business & Reputation Implications

• For Louis Vuitton, a globally recognised luxury brand, the investigation raises reputational risks: questions about internal controls and compliance practices may undermine consumer trust and brand prestige.

• From a regulatory standpoint, this case highlights how retail luxury goods operations can become vehicles for money-laundering schemes — especially through cash purchases and cross-border shipments.

• The use of daigou channels (buy-amid-abroad, ship to Asia) is flagged by authorities as a convenient method to obscure the origin of funds and circumvent tax/import regimes.  

Broader Context

• The global luxury goods market has seen increasing regulatory scrutiny: high-value items like handbags, jewellery, watches and art are increasingly considered potential conduits for illicit finance.

• The structuring of cash transactions — where large sums are broken into smaller payments to avoid threshold reporting — is a well-known money-laundering tactic and appears central in this case.

• Cross-border shipment of luxury goods adds another layer of complexity: goods purchased in one jurisdiction but exported/sold in another can mask origin of funds and complicate oversight.

What Comes Next

• The OM will determine whether to prosecute Louis Vuitton’s Dutch entity. If so, charges could include failure to prevent money laundering or facilitation of illicit finance.

• Regardless of outcome, we may expect increased regulatory pressure on luxury retail operations to implement stronger compliance measures — such as customer due-diligence (CDD), monitoring of high-value cash purchases, and flagging suspicious resale/export patterns.

• For consumers and stakeholders of Louis Vuitton, watch for: official responses from the brand, regulatory disclosures, and any material impact on operations or brand perception.

Takeaways

• This case is not simply about one shopper spending millions: it implicates how a major brand’s retail operations may inadvertently (or otherwise) enable laundering of criminal proceeds.

• It reinforces the importance for luxury brands of viewing anti-money-laundering compliance not just as a back-office obligation, but as a core part of brand integrity and risk management.

• For regulators, it shows that industries beyond banks and financial institutions — including luxury goods retail — must be vigilant in preventing abuse by organised crime.

Attached is a news article regarding Louis vutton under investigation for money laundering 

https://robbreport.com/lifestyle/news/louis-vuitton-netherlands-money-laundering-case-1236897206/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

North Korea Issues Ultimatum to Israel Over Alleged Detention of Greta Thunberg

In a startling escalation of international tensions, North Korea has reportedly issued an ultimatum to Israel, demanding the immediate release of Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, who Pyongyang claims is being held by Israeli authorities. The announcement, made through state-run media early Tuesday, accused Israel of “environmental terrorism and kidnapping a global peace figure.”

The statement from the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) warned that “failure to release Greta Thunberg within 72 hours will result in severe consequences for the Zionist regime.” While the nature of those consequences was not specified, the threat has already drawn widespread condemnation and disbelief from governments worldwide.

Confusion and Denials

Israeli officials quickly dismissed the claim as “absurd and entirely fabricated,” stating that Thunberg has not been detained and has no known connection to Israel in recent weeks.

A spokesperson for the Israeli Foreign Ministry called the North Korean statement “an outrageous propaganda stunt,” adding that “Greta Thunberg is not, and has never been, in Israeli custody.”

Thunberg’s representatives also confirmed she is safe and currently participating in environmental advocacy events in Europe. Her foundation described North Korea’s claims as “bizarre and baseless.”

A Strange Diplomatic Twist

Analysts suggest the incident may be part of Pyongyang’s broader strategy to inject itself into high-profile global narratives. Dr. Helen Crawford, an international relations expert at the London School of Economics, said,

“North Korea has a long history of using fabricated crises to gain media attention or leverage in diplomatic negotiations. In this case, linking Greta Thunberg’s name to Israel may be an attempt to appeal to global audiences sympathetic to anti-establishment causes.”

The move comes amid a period of increasing isolation for North Korea, following recent missile tests and renewed UN sanctions. The regime’s attempt to insert itself into environmental and humanitarian discourse has been seen by many as a publicity maneuver rather than a serious diplomatic initiative.

Global Reaction

The United Nations issued a cautious statement urging restraint and calling for the “verification of facts before any escalation.” Western nations, including the UK and the United States, described North Korea’s claims as “nonsensical.”

Social media, however, quickly caught fire with conspiracy theories and memes, some depicting Kim Jong-un as “Greta’s unexpected defender.”

Final Word

As of now, Greta Thunberg has made no direct comment on North Korea’s statement. However, her recent social media posts continue to focus on climate change and global action against fossil fuels—making no reference to the alleged diplomatic dispute.

While the world waits to see whether Pyongyang’s ultimatum will fizzle out or escalate, experts agree on one thing: the story underscores North Korea’s unpredictable use of misinformation as a tool of statecraft.

Attached is a news article regarding Greta release under Isreal authorities requested by North Korean leader 

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/01/middleeast/israel-gaza-flotilla-explainer-scli-intl

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored smileband, 

The Incident: What Happened

In May 2024, UniSuper—responsible for about A$125 billion (roughly US$80–90 billion) in retirement savings for employees in Australia’s higher-education and research sectors—experienced a major outage.  

Specifically:

• UniSuper’s private-cloud environment on Google Cloud (GCP) was deleted due to what Google described as an “inadvertent misconfiguration during provisioning of UniSuper’s Private Cloud services ultimately resulted in the deletion of UniSuper’s Private Cloud subscription.”  

• More than half a million fund members—around 620,000 accounts—found themselves unable to access their accounts for about a week.  

• Both Google Cloud and UniSuper confirmed that the incident was not a cyber-attack or data breach; personal data was not exposed, they say.  

The key point is that the deletion affected UniSuper’s cloud subscription (and implicitly its infrastructure) rather than “erasing” the pension fund’s investments or cash. The funds remain managed, but access was disrupted and the IT systems underpinning them were severely impacted.

Why It Matters

This incident is noteworthy for several reasons:

1. Scale and visibility

A pension fund of this size—with over A$125 billion under management—being impacted by a cloud provider outage is a rare event. It signals that even large-scale, ‘mission-critical’ financial systems are vulnerable to cloud-provider errors.  

2. Cloud dependency risk

It highlights the risks inherent in heavy reliance on a single cloud provider or platform for key business systems. Even with geographic redundancy, if a subscription is cancelled/deleted, the redundancy can fail. For example: UniSuper had duplication across geographies, but the deletion of the subscription apparently cascaded.  

3. Trust and reputation implications

For UniSuper, member trust is crucial—members expect their retirement savings to be accessible and secure. A week of system unavailability can damage confidence. For Google Cloud, this incident raises questions about internal controls, configuration management, and safeguards for large enterprise clients.

4. Backup and recovery issues

The incident reflects a fundamental principle: having backups and disaster-recovery plans is vital, but they must be robust, diverse, frequently tested, and ideally not dependent on the same provider/zone.  

5. Regulatory/regime risk

Financial services firms operate in regulated environments. Outages like this may draw regulator scrutiny regarding operational resilience, business continuity planning, and third-party (cloud vendor) dependencies. 

How the Error Occurred (as reported)

According to available reports:

• The problem began during provisioning of UniSuper’s private-cloud services on Google Cloud. A misconfiguration caused the cloud subscription to be treated incorrectly—leading to its deletion.  

• Some accounts and instances were geo-redundant, but the deletion action apparently invoked the same underlying subscription across multiple geographies, so the redundancy did not shield UniSuper.  

• Google and UniSuper stated that backups existed on a third-party provider (outside the primary GCP environment) which allowed eventual recovery.  

• The companies described the event as “an isolated, one-of-a-kind occurrence that has never before occurred with any of Google Cloud’s clients globally.”  

Consequences & Response

• Member access was interrupted for about a week. The system restoration was gradual.  

• Investment balances and account statements were delayed; while the funds themselves were not “lost”, the ability to view or transact may have been affected.  

• Google Cloud and UniSuper released a joint apology and stated that no personal data was compromised.  

• Google indicated that the incident was not systemic (i.e., not part of a global bug affecting many customers) but rather an “isolated” mis-configuration.  

• For UniSuper, the event likely triggered internal reviews of cloud strategy, disaster-recovery protocols, and vendor risk.

Lessons Learned

From this incident, several important takeaways emerge for any organisation relying on cloud infrastructure, especially for critical systems:

• Avoid single-point of failure: Redundancy is more than having multiple regions. If the underlying subscription or account configuration is flawed, having multiple regions under that same faulty subscription may not help.

• Diversify backup/DR providers: Having backups with a different provider/platform than your primary cloud vendor reduces correlated risk.

• Test recovery plans: It’s not enough to say you have backups—organisations need to verify they work, that they can be restored timely, and that the IT environment (including identity/access/billing/subscriptions) supports recovery.

• Understand cloud provider limitations: Even major cloud platforms can have serious failures or configuration errors. Organisations must understand what the vendor is responsible for—and what the customer must handle.

• Clear communication during outages: For member-facing organisations (like pension funds), transparency in communication during an outage helps maintain trust. Delays or ambiguity can compound reputational damage.

• Financial/resilience governance: In regulated industries, this incident may prompt questions on whether cloud-vendor risk was properly assessed, whether vendors are part of the business-continuity plan, and whether senior management oversight of cloud operations is sufficient.

Outlook & Context

This incident sits within a broader context of increasing cloud adoption by large financial firms, superannuation/pension funds, and other critical-infrastructure enterprises. While the benefits of cloud—scalability, flexibility, cost efficiency—are clear, this event underscores that the “cloud is not magic” and operational risk remains.

From Google’s perspective, the event may slow cloud vendor trust, especially with highly regulated clients. They will need to demonstrate improved safeguards, clearer governance, and perhaps deeper auditing of configuration/deletion operations.

For UniSuper and similar funds, the incident may trigger re-evaluation of cloud strategy: moving to multi-cloud or hybrid models, increasing on-premises fallback capacity, or enhancing their contract/SLAs with cloud vendors to include “account deletion” risk scenarios.

Conclusion

While the headline—“Google wiped a US$125 billion pension fund”—is dramatic, the reality is more nuanced: the assets themselves were not lost or stolen; rather, the cloud infrastructure powering the fund’s operations was deleted due to a misconfiguration—and that caused a major service disruption.

Nevertheless, the incident is a sobering reminder: in a world where retirement funds, critical infrastructure and financial institutions increasingly trust their systems to cloud-platforms, the human/misconfiguration risk remains real. Organisations must invest not only in the cloud, but also in robust fallback strategies, vendor governance, and rigorous testing of disaster-recovery plans.

Attached is a news article regarding google wiping 125 billion of employees in Australia funds 

https://www.business-standard.com/amp/world-news/google-cloud-accidentally-deletes-125-billion-australian-pension-fund-124051800606_1.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561