222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Tuesday, 28 October 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

China Unveils Plans for an Artificial Moon to Light Up the Night Sky

In a bold step that blurs the line between science fiction and reality, China has announced its plan to launch an artificial moon designed to illuminate urban areas at night, potentially reducing the nation’s energy consumption. The ambitious project, led by scientists in Chengdu, is said to be capable of producing light up to eight times brighter than the real moon.

A Futuristic Vision

The artificial moon, which is essentially a satellite with a highly reflective surface, is designed to bounce sunlight back to Earth, lighting up specific regions during nighttime hours. The device will orbit at around 500 kilometers above the Earth, much closer than the natural moon’s 380,000-kilometer distance. This proximity will allow it to focus light more precisely on designated areas — such as cities or disaster zones — where extra illumination could be beneficial.

Officials from the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) say the satellite could significantly cut down electricity bills, particularly in urban centers, by replacing streetlights with reflected sunlight for up to 50 square kilometers of coverage.

Testing and Deployment

The first experimental launch is expected to occur within the next few years, following a series of tests on reflectivity, orbital stability, and environmental impact. If successful, China could become the first nation in history to harness orbital reflectors as a consistent light source.

Researchers say the artificial moon will be equipped with adjustable panels to control brightness and direction. “We are developing precision control systems to ensure the reflected light does not interfere with human or animal life,” said Wu Chunfeng, head of the Chengdu Aerospace Science and Microelectronics System Research Institute.

Environmental and Ethical Concerns

While the project has drawn international attention for its ingenuity, it has also sparked debate. Critics argue that constant artificial lighting could disrupt ecosystems and wildlife patterns, particularly nocturnal animals that rely on natural darkness. Astronomers have also raised concerns that the artificial moon could interfere with night sky visibility and ground-based telescopic observations.

Environmental groups have called for greater transparency and global cooperation before large-scale deployment. “We need to understand the long-term ecological implications before placing artificial light sources in orbit,” said one Beijing-based environmental analyst.

A Race in Space Innovation

China’s artificial moon project is part of its broader strategy to become a global leader in space technology and innovation. In recent years, Beijing has launched missions to the far side of the Moon, deployed the Tiangong Space Station, and made major advances in satellite communications and solar power research.

If the artificial moon works as planned, it could revolutionize how nations think about energy efficiency, urban planning, and space-based infrastructure — but it also raises new questions about who controls the night sky.

Attached is a News article regarding china artificial moon

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-45910479.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Introduction

In a significant policy reversal, Alphabet Inc.—the parent company of Google LLC—has quietly removed a long-standing pledge forbidding its artificial-intelligence technologies from being used for weapons or surveillance applications. This marks a major shift in the ethical framework that once underpinned Google’s AI work, and raises far-reaching implications for technology, industry, national security and public trust.

What changed

The old stance

Back in 2018, Google published its “AI Principles” in which it explicitly committed not to pursue certain applications of AI, including:

• “technologies that cause or are likely to cause overall harm”

• “weapons or other technologies whose principal purpose or implementation is to cause or directly facilitate injury to people”

• “technologies that gather or use information for surveillance violating internationally accepted norms”

The reversal

In early February 2025, Alphabet / Google updated its public principles document, removing the section titled “Applications we will not pursue” which contained the above prohibitions.

In place of rigid bans, the new framing emphasises “responsible development and deployment”, human oversight, due-diligence and alignment with “widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.”

In their blog post, senior executives at Google, including Demis Hassabis (DeepMind) and James Manyika (Google Tech & Society), argued that the shift reflects “a global competition for AI leadership within an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape.”

Why does this matter

Strategic & economic dimension

• Google argues that in the current era, AI has become a general-purpose technology, ubiquitous and fundamental — much like mobile phones or the Internet. As such, rigid bans may limit commercial and strategic opportunity.

• By removing explicit prohibitions, Alphabet positions itself to participate in defence-, surveillance- or national-security-adjacent AI work—areas that potentially involve large budgets and governmental contracts.

• The company frames this as part of ensuring “democracies should lead in AI development… guided by freedom, equality, and respect for human rights.”

Ethical, human-rights & security concerns

• Critics argue that removing the clear ban creates a slippery slope: if AI can be used in weapons or surveillance systems, what safeguards exist to prevent misuse, or systems operating without sufficient human control?

• The change comes amid broader concerns about the militarization of Big Tech and the role of AI in autonomous weapons systems.

• There are potential reputational risks for Google: employees have previously protested internal contracts relating to defence (for example the 2018 Project Maven controversy). Removing the ban may reignite internal ethical conflicts and external scrutiny.

Regulatory and global governance implications

• The move occurs at a time when regions like the EU Artificial Intelligence Act are introducing stricter rules around high-risk AI uses (including weapons, surveillance, safety).

• Google’s policy shift may influence how other tech firms define ethical AI frameworks—and could raise the bar for regulatory intervention or public demands for transparency, accountability and oversight.

Reactions & implications

• Skepticism: Some former Google AI researchers say removing the bans “erases the work that so many people in the ethical AI space … had done at Google” and “means Google will probably now work on deploying technology directly that can kill people.”

• Defenders: Google leadership maintains that changing global dynamics (geopolitical, commercial) require adapting the principles, rather than sticking to an era of rigid boundaries.

• Internal dynamics: This policy flip may accelerate tensions between workers, management and ethics teams at Google/DeepMind—and could lead to further internal activism or resignations.

• Industry ripple-effect: Other companies may feel pressure to follow suit or clarify their own commitments—leading to a broader industry shift in how AI for defence or surveillance is treated.

• Public trust and brand risk: For a company whose slogan once included “Don’t be evil”, the optics of enabling AI weapons may affect consumer, investor and societal trust.

What’s next: questions to watch

1. Contract disclosures – Will Google/Alphabet publicly reveal if they engage in AI work for weapons, National Security Agencies, or surveillance systems?

2. Scope and limits – What definitions will Google use for “weapons” vs “defensive AI” vs “dual-use”? The boundary between benign and harmful may blur.

3. Human oversight – The new principles emphasise human oversight, but how will that be operationalised? Are there independent audits or clear governance mechanisms?

4. Regulatory battlefronts – Will governments (especially in EU/UK) respond to the policy shift with stricter oversight, perhaps mandating transparency for defence AI partnerships?

5. Worker/activist pushback – Will Google employees, activists or investors force renewed commitments, restrictions or transparency on military / surveillance AI?

6. Global arms-race implications – The shift could accelerate the pace at which AI is integrated into defence systems globally, raising ethics of autonomous weapons, proliferation risks, arms control challenges.

Conclusion

In removing its self-imposed ban on using AI in weapons and surveillance, Alphabet has shifted from clear prohibition to a more flexible risk-benefit framework — one that opens the door to defence and national-security applications of AI. While Google frames the move as pragmatic and aligned with the geopolitical realities of AI competition, the reversal raises major ethical, regulatory and strategic questions.

For a tech giant that once pledged to avoid contributing to systems that “cause or are likely to cause overall harm”, this change marks a departure—and will inevitably spark debate among employees, regulators, defenders of human rights, and the public at large. How Google implements this new policy in practice, and how transparent it remains about its work in defence or surveillance domains, will be critical measures of how much this shift matters in the real world.

Attached is a news article regarding goggle partner company alphabet removes bam on AI weapon

https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025/02/google-scraps-pledge-not-to-use-ai-for-weapons-00202570

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Introduction

American singer-rapper Chris Brown, known for hits such as “Run It!” and “Go Crazy”, finds himself once again in the headlines — not merely for music, but for legal turbulence. Recent developments have reignited conversation about his status and ability to travel internationally, notably regarding his return to the U.S. and how his charges have evolved.

Background of Legal Issues

Chris Brown’s legal history is extensive, going back years. Some of the key moments:

• In 2013 in Washington, D.C., Brown punched a man after a photo-op and pleaded guilty to a simple assault misdemeanor.

• In June 2021 he was involved in a reported domestic argument in Los Angeles.

• The latest major incident: On 15 May 2025, Brown was arrested in Manchester, England, pursuant to a warrant in relation to a 19 February 2023 incident at a London nightclub (the TAPE nightclub in Mayfair) in which he is accused of using a tequila bottle to assault music producer Abraham Diaw.

Recent Court Hearings & Charges

• In June 2025, Brown pleaded not guilty to the charge of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent.

• In July 2025, he entered not guilty pleas to two further charges: assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH) and possession of an offensive weapon (a bottle) in a public place.

• His trial has been set to commence 26 October 2026, at which he will face the above counts.

The Travel / Return to U.S. Question

There have been numerous reports about Brown’s ability to travel, especially given his international legal entanglements. Some key points:

• Brown began the European leg of his worldwide tour, Breezy Bowl XX, on 8 June 2025 in Amsterdam, which indicates that despite the UK arrest, he was granted bail and permitted to continue touring.

• The bail conditions included a £5 million security fee and travel restrictions were presumably managed by the court.

• While I found no credible recent source explicitly stating that his charges have been completely dropped or that the U.S. entry requirement has been officially changed, his continuance of U.S. tour dates (as reported) suggests that travel permission or arrangements have been made. For example: the AP reported that he is set to tour North America following his UK legal proceedings.

Key Observations & What to Watch

1. Not a full exoneration: Though pleads of “not guilty” have been entered and certain older charges were dropped way back (e.g., a Florida battery charge in 2019) – Brown still faces serious charges in the UK as of mid-2025.

2. Travel allowed under bail: His tour continuing indicates that despite the UK charges, the bail terms permit movement for his performances. This implies some coordination between his legal team and the court’s jurisdiction.

3. U.S. return likely, but conditions unknown: While there’s no publicly verified statement that his U.S. travel privileges have been permanently restored or that visa issues have been resolved, the fact that North American tour dates are reported gives weight to the idea that his return to the U.S. is feasible.

4. Risks remain: Should the trial proceed and result in conviction (if one occurs), future travel, especially to countries with strict criminal-entry laws (including the U.S. itself) could become more restricted.

Implications for Brown and His Career

• The ability to tour the U.S. is crucial for his earnings, public relevance, and engagement with his core fan base.

• Legal uncertainty still looms: promoters, venues, insurers may remain cautious until the UK case is fully resolved.

• Public perception: Even if legally “allowed” to return and tour, the reputational shadow of ongoing legal battle could influence brand deals, media coverage, and public reception.

• For the U.S. immigration/entry side, if any conviction were to occur abroad that triggers inadmissibility (depending on the sentence), then Brown might face additional barriers. Though as of now, no such resolution is public.

Conclusion

Chris Brown is navigating a complex legal landscape: serious UK charges remain pending, but his ongoing worldwide tour and reported North American dates suggest he has regained mobility to a significant degree. While official confirmation of “charges changed” or “clear for U.S. return” is not found in publicly verifiable sources as of now, the evidence strongly indicates that his travel and U.S. return are functionally active under his bail and tour arrangements. In short: he’s back on the road and likely back in the U.S., but not yet entirely free of legal uncertainty.

Attached is a News article regarding Chris brown charges have changed and he can return to the US

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15235655/amp/Chris-Brown-allowed-return-US-bail-charged-unprovoked-attack-music-producer-nightclub.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Kate’s Story: The Ongoing Scars of Britain’s Grooming Gang Scandals

The grooming gang scandals that shook towns across the UK have left a lasting scar on victims and communities alike. Among those affected is Kate (name changed for privacy), who bravely came forward to share her story of being exploited by a network of men operating in her hometown when she was just a teenager.

Kate was targeted, manipulated, and abused over several years by a group of older men of Pakistani heritage who preyed on vulnerable young girls. Like many victims, she came from a troubled background, making her an easy target for grooming tactics that began with flattery, gifts, and attention — before escalating into systematic sexual exploitation.

For years, authorities failed to act. Reports of abuse were ignored, and victims were dismissed as unreliable or complicit in their own exploitation. “I was just a child,” Kate recalled. “They made me believe they cared about me — but I was being used, passed around, and discarded.”

The scandal, exposed in cities such as Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford, revealed institutional failures on a national scale. An independent inquiry later found that over 1,400 children in Rotherham alone had been abused between 1997 and 2013. Fear of being labelled racist reportedly stopped officials and police from investigating gangs primarily composed of men of South Asian heritage.

Today, Kate continues to rebuild her life, but the trauma remains. “You never get over something like this,” she says. “You just learn to live with it.” She now speaks out to help raise awareness and support other survivors, calling for more education, tougher sentencing, and better protection for vulnerable children.

Campaigners argue that while arrests and convictions have increased in recent years, the deeper societal and institutional issues that allowed such crimes to persist have not been fully resolved. Survivors like Kate want lasting change — not just apologies.

Attached is a News regarding a women called Kate who was abused by a grooming gang scandal

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7vd1zmd0lzo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Hurricane Melissa – A Catastrophic Threat to Jamaica

Storm Overview

A monstrous hurricane named Hurricane Melissa has turned ominous for Jamaica as it intensifies into a Category 5 storm — the highest level on the Saffir–Simpson hurricane wind scale. It is now regarded by meteorologists as the strongest storm in Jamaica’s recorded history.

• Melissa’s sustained winds are estimated at up to 175 mph (282 km/h).

• Central pressure has plunged to around 903 millibars, placing it among the most powerful Atlantic hurricanes documented.

• The hurricane is moving sluggishly (~5 mph), which means prolonged impacts — heavier rain, longer wind exposure.

Why This Is Exceptionally Dangerous

There are several factors that amplify the threat posed by Hurricane Melissa:

• Direct landfall at Category 5 intensity on Jamaica appears likely — something unprecedented in Jamaica’s meteorological records.

• Massive rainfall is forecast: some models suggest up to 20–30 inches (500–760 mm) in places, with isolated totals perhaps much higher in mountainous terrain.

• Storm surge risk along the southern coast is extremely elevated, with up to 13 feet (4 m) of surge expected in some areas.

• Slow movement = time for destruction: With slower advancement, the storm will subject areas to longer durations of fierce wind, rain, and coastal flooding.

• Climate context: Experts note that warmer sea surface temperatures and favorable conditions are helping storms like Melissa ramp up rapidly.

Impacts and Preparations in Jamaica

The Jamaican government, emergency services and local communities are mobilising for what officials describe as a potential generational disaster:

• The Prime Minister of Jamaica, Andrew Holness, warned that “there is no infrastructure in the region that can withstand a Category 5 storm”.

• Shelters: Over 800 shelters have been opened across the island, though uptake remains lower than ideal.

• Evacuations have been ordered in vulnerable coastal and low-lying areas; however, some residents are reluctant, citing fears of looting or uncertainty.

• Early damage: Even before landfall, reports of falling trees, landslides, power outages and coastal flooding are emerging.

• Infrastructure at risk: Key assets like airports, ports, power plants and bridges lie in the path and are vulnerable to both wind and storm surge.

What’s at Stake

• Lives & safety: The combination of wind, water, and surge means that entire communities may be isolated, homes destroyed, and risks of fatalities increased dramatically.

• Economy & agriculture: Jamaica’s agriculture, tourism infrastructure and coastal economies face severe disruption. Farms, beaches, resort areas—all are threatened.

• Recovery challenges: Given the scale of the storm and damage, recovery will be slow. Access to some regions may be blocked by landslides or flooding for days.

Looking Beyond Jamaica

While Jamaica is currently the focus, the storm’s path continues:

• After Jamaica, Melissa is expected to move toward southeastern Cuba and then the Bahamas / Turks and Caicos Islands.

• The fact that this is already the third Category 5 hurricane of the Atlantic 2025 season could mark a wider shift in the strength and frequency of major hurricanes.

What to Do (and Advice for Those in Jamaica or Visiting)

For residents, visitors, and authorities: heed advice, follow instructions, and prepare thoroughly.

• Move to shelters or secure safe places away from coastlines as ordered.

• Stock up on essentials: water, non-perishable food, medications, batteries.

• Secure important documents, vehicles, valuables.

• Avoid coastal zones, beaches, rivers — the risk of surge, flooding and landslides is high.

• After the storm: stay indoors until official “all clear” is given, watch for downed power lines, contaminated water or unstable structures.

Final Thoughts

Hurricane Melissa stands out as a storm of historic magnitude for Jamaica. Its combination of intensity, slow movement and large scale make it a formidable threat to life and infrastructure. While predictions always carry uncertainties (exact winding path, landfall location, timing), the forecast is sufficiently grave that all caution must be taken seriously.

As Jamaica braces, the Caribbean region watches — this is potentially one of the most damaging storms the island has ever faced.

Attached is a news article regarding record breaking category 5 hurricane set to pummel Jamaica

https://www.wandsworthguardian.co.uk/news/national/25576305.hurricane-melissa-batter-jamaica-islands-strongest-storm-record/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Monday, 27 October 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Cristiano Ronaldo and His Mother Visit the Holy Kaaba in Mecca

Football legend Cristiano Ronaldo has once again captured global attention — this time not for his on-field performance, but for a deeply spiritual moment. The Portuguese superstar was seen at the Kaaba in Mecca, accompanied by his mother, Maria Dolores dos Santos Aveiro, in what many are calling a touching display of faith, respect, and unity.

Images and videos circulating on social media show Ronaldo and his mother dressed in traditional white attire, walking reverently around the Kaaba — the holiest site in Islam. The moment quickly went viral, with millions of fans expressing admiration for the star’s humility and open-mindedness.

Ronaldo, who currently plays for Al Nassr FC in Saudi Arabia, has been living in the Kingdom since 2023 and has often spoken positively about the country’s culture and hospitality. His visit to the Kaaba marks a significant moment in his personal journey, reflecting how his time in Saudi Arabia has allowed him to engage deeply with local customs and religious traditions.

His mother, Maria Dolores, was seen smiling and visibly emotional during the visit. Sources close to the family revealed that she had expressed a desire to visit Mecca ever since Ronaldo’s move to Saudi Arabia. For many fans, it was heartwarming to see the pair share this profound experience together — a reminder of Ronaldo’s close bond with his mother, who has supported him since his early days in Madeira.

Though Ronaldo has not confirmed whether the visit was part of a pilgrimage or a personal gesture of respect, many Muslims have praised the act as a sign of cultural appreciation and unity between faiths.

Social media platforms were flooded with messages of admiration. One fan wrote, “Ronaldo continues to inspire — not just through football, but through his humility and respect for others’ beliefs.” Another commented, “Seeing him and his mother at the Kaaba shows how love, peace, and respect can connect us all.”

As one of the most influential athletes on the planet, Ronaldo’s presence at such a sacred site has once again demonstrated the power of sport to bridge cultural divides. Whether a believer or not, his respectful visit to Mecca is a powerful statement about understanding and coexistence in a world often divided by difference.

In a career marked by trophies, records, and accolades, this quiet moment of reflection may be one of Cristiano Ronaldo’s most meaningful achievements — a reminder that even the greatest stars find peace in humility and gratitude.

Attached is a news article regarding christino Ronaldo and the Kaaba with his mother

https://www.facebook.com/100063714459607/posts/cristiano-ronaldo-after-visiting-mecca-in-saudi-arabia-shared-a-profound-message/1121912123275926/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News, sponsored by smileband,

Indian Rapper Lil Blackout: The Rising Star Redefining South Asian Hip-Hop

In a country known for its classical music heritage and Bollywood soundtracks, one name is quickly cutting through the noise — Lil Blackout, India’s newest and most controversial rap sensation. Born and raised in Mumbai, Lil Blackout has become the face of a new generation of Indian artists blending Western hip-hop culture with raw, homegrown street energy.

From the Streets to the Studio

Lil Blackout, whose real name remains largely private, grew up in a lower-middle-class neighborhood where music was both an escape and a weapon. He started rapping in his teens, writing verses about social inequality, corruption, and the struggles of India’s youth. What began as freestyle sessions in school corridors soon became viral hits on platforms like YouTube and Instagram Reels.

His breakthrough came in 2023 with the track “No Filter,” which exploded across Indian social media for its unapologetic lyrics and gritty visuals filmed in Mumbai’s backstreets. The song addressed issues like unemployment, police harassment, and political hypocrisy — topics rarely explored so openly in mainstream Indian music.

A Sound That Crosses Borders

Lil Blackout’s music fuses trap beats, Punjabi flows, and Hindi-English slang, creating a hybrid style that appeals to both Indian and international audiences. His production style has drawn comparisons to American rappers like Travis Scott and Lil Durk, but with a uniquely South Asian twist — local rhythms, samples from Bollywood classics, and hard-hitting lyrics in multiple languages.

Critics say Lil Blackout represents a “musical rebellion” — a voice for India’s overlooked youth who face systemic challenges but still dream big. His tracks often go viral not just for their rhythm but for their honesty.

Controversy and Authenticity

Lil Blackout’s rise hasn’t come without controversy. Some traditionalists have accused him of promoting “Western immorality,” while others praise his boldness for addressing taboo topics like poverty, caste discrimination, and drug use. Despite the criticism, Lil Blackout insists his goal is not to shock, but to speak truth to power.

In a recent interview, he said, “Hip-hop isn’t about pretending. It’s about reality — and in India, our reality deserves to be heard too.”

The Future of Indian Rap

As Lil Blackout continues to gain followers, major record labels are reportedly eyeing collaborations with him. He’s rumored to be working on his debut album, “Blacked Out,” set for release in 2026, which promises to feature a mix of English, Hindi, and regional Indian tracks.

For now, Lil Blackout remains an independent artist — fiercely loyal to his roots and determined to push Indian rap to new global heights.

With millions of streams and a growing fanbase across Asia, Lil Blackout is more than just a rapper; he’s a movement. His journey reflects the rise of a new cultural identity — one that refuses to stay silent in a world that’s finally ready to listen.

Attached is a News article regarding the Indian rap

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20220609-how-rap-became-a-powerful-form-of-protest-in-india

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Parenting rights for same-sex couples in Italy: banned, restricted — and evolving

Italy presents a complex and evolving legal landscape for gay and lesbian couples who wish to become parents. While many jurisdictions in Western Europe have progressed toward full equality of marriage and parenting rights for same-sex couples, Italy remains far more restrictive — though recent court decisions are beginning to shift the terrain. Below is a breakdown of the key features, legal obstacles, recent developments and what lies ahead.

1. The legal framework and status quo

Civil unions but no same-sex marriage

Since 2016, same-sex couples in Italy have been able to enter into the legal institution of civil unions (Legge Cirinnà) — but not same-sex marriage.

This matters for parenting rights, because many adoption laws and parental recognition criteria are tied to the status of “married couples”.

Adoption and parenting rights

• The key adoption law in Italy is Law No. 184 of 1983, which states adoption is generally permitted only for married, opposite-sex couples.

• Same-sex couples in Italy therefore face legal exclusion from standard adoption and from many parental recognition processes. A 2024 academic study states: “Today in Italy, it is impossible for same-sex couples or single lesbian women and gay men to adopt a child … children born to families with same-sex parents are children of only one legal parent.”

• Surrogacy is illegal in Italy, and going abroad to use surrogacy has been increasingly criminalised: as of recent legislative changes, Italians using surrogacy abroad may face prosecution.

Recognition of parenthood in practice

• Some municipalities had allowed non-biological same-sex parents (especially in female couples) to register as parents, or to have “two mothers” on the birth certificate, but this was done on a local basis, not via a clear national law.

• However, the national government has taken steps to reverse or curb these local practices by instructing municipalities to recognise only one (biological) parent in cases of same-sex couples.

2. Why same-sex couples face major obstacles

Legal exclusion due to marital status

Because adoption law demands a married, opposite-sex couple, same-sex couples are excluded by definition. This structural exclusion means they cannot adopt together as equals in many cases.

Restricted access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and surrogacy

• In vitro fertilisation (IVF) and other medically assisted reproduction are legally restricted to heterosexual couples in Italy; same-sex couples cannot access them domestically.

• Surrogacy is prohibited in Italy and recent legislation seeks to criminalise even Italians going abroad to have children via surrogacy, which disproportionately affects gay men (who often rely on surrogacy abroad).

Lack of full legal recognition for non-biological parent

Even when a same-sex couple has a child (via foreign MAR or surrogacy), the non-biological partner often faces enormous legal hurdles to be recognised as a parent — sometimes requiring a special adoption route or court decision.

Political and cultural resistance

The current Italian government under Giorgia Meloni emphasises “mother and father” as the family model, and the government has resisted expanding same-sex parenting rights, seeking instead to strengthen restrictions.

3. Recent developments: cracks in the wall

Despite the heavy restrictions, a few important court decisions are starting to shift the legal landscape:

• In May 2025, the Italian Constitutional Court (Corte Costituzionale) ruled that a lesbian couple — where one partner carried the child abroad via medically assisted procreation — must have both mothers recognised on the birth certificate. The court declared the refusal to recognise the non-biological, intending mother as a violation of constitutional rights (Article 2, 3 & 30).

• In July 2025, the Constitutional Court further held that the non-biological mother in a same-sex union is entitled to paternity leave (the mandatory 10-day leave) — recognising her as equivalent in parental responsibility.

• These decisions mark progress, especially for female same-sex couples, but they do not yet mean full equality for all cases (e.g., male couples via surrogacy) or eliminate all legal hurdles.

4. What still remains banned or uncertain

• Same-sex couples do not have full legal access to adoption together as equal parents in many cases. The default adoption law still demands married opposite-sex couples.

• Surrogacy remains illegal in Italy, and punitive legislation for Italians using surrogacy abroad is making the situation riskier for gay men in particular.

• Recognition of parenthood when children are born abroad (via foreign MAR or surrogacy) remains inconsistent and legally uncertain, especially for male same-sex couples.

• There is no dedicated national statute fully addressing same-sex parenting rights; much remains reliant on court decisions or local municipal practices.

5. Impact on families and children

• Same-sex couples face high emotional, legal and financial barriers to becoming parents. Many must go abroad for MAR or surrogacy, then engage in prolonged legal battles to receive recognition.

• Children in these families may lack full legal recognition of both parents. That can affect their rights to inheritance, custody if one parent dies, access to services, or merely registered status.

• The patchwork of municipal practices means that outcomes vary hugely by city — some local authorities had been more progressive, while national directives are pushing back.

6. Where things might be heading

• Further court decisions are likely to continue expanding recognition of same-sex parents, particularly for female couples. The Constitutional Court has already taken strong positions in 2025.

• Pressure remains on the Italian Parliament to pass more comprehensive legislation covering same-sex parenting rights — but given political resistance, this may take time.

• Legal activism and advocacy by organisations such as Famiglie Arcobaleno and Rete Lenford continue to push for full equality.

• The risks for male same-sex couples (surrogacy abroad, non-recognition of parenthood) remain particularly high. Unless surrogacy laws or recognition rules are changed, many will continue to face exclusion or heavy legal burdens.

7. Conclusion

In summary: yes — in Italy same-sex couples currently face significant bans and barriers when it comes to parenting. They cannot rely on a clear and equal legal framework for adoption, surrogacy is prohibited, and recognition of parenthood remains precarious and inconsistent. Yet the story is not static. Recent court rulings have begun to chip away at the rigid exclusion of non-biological same-sex parents, especially in female couples. For those writing about the topic, the key message is one of partial progress amid continuing structural limitations.

Attached is a News article regarding gay and lesbian couples banned from having children

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62rmv63069o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Lenny Henry calls for £18 trillion in slavery reparations

1. What has Lenny Henry proposed

Lenny Henry, the British comedian and actor, has co-written a book titled The Big Payback: The Case for Reparations for Slavery and How They Would Work with Marcus Ryder. In it, he argues that the UK should pay out £18 trillion in reparations to Black British citizens and to Caribbean nations affected by the transatlantic slave trade.

Henry writes:

“All black British people … need reparations for slavery … we personally deserve money for the effects of slavery.”

He links the legacy of slavery to present-day inequalities such as higher unemployment and the over-representation of Black people in the criminal justice system.

In the book, Henry and Ryder suggest that reparations need not solely be cash but also include structural reforms aimed at dismantling the lasting institutional effects of slavery.

2. Why the £18 trillion figure

The figure arises from research invoking a calculation by the Brattle Group (an economic consultancy) which estimated that Western powers might owe close to US $100 trillion in reparatory obligations globally. Henry’s proposal translates a portion of that into the UK context (giving £18 trillion) for Britain’s role in the slave trade and colonial empire.

Henry’s argument is that because the British government, at the time of abolition, compensated slave-owners (rather than the enslaved), and because the legacy of that history still shapes racial inequality today, a compensation action is warranted now. The book notes that Britain only finished repaying the debt taken out to compensate slave owners in 2015.

3. How has the public and political sphere responded

The proposal has triggered strong debate:

• Some commentators argue the figure is unrealistic and question who would pay, how it would be calculated and administered.

• Others emphasise the moral dimension: that acknowledging the legacy of slavery and colonialism is overdue, and that structural inequalities tied to race demand more than symbolic gestures.

• From the political side, the UK government has so far declined to agree to direct cash reparations. For instance, when asked about monetary payments for slavery, the government said they were “very clear” they would not pay.

4. What are the implications and challenges

Implications:

• If taken seriously, Henry’s proposal would force a national-scale reckoning with Britain’s colonial and slavery history: economically (huge sums involved), socially (how to define beneficiaries), and politically (public consent, tax burden, legal precedents).

• It also contributes to a growing global movement of reparations debates: other countries, with former colonies or histories of forced labour, are also revisiting the concept of reparatory justice.

• The proposal shifts focus from simply apologising or memorialising the past, to envisioning material redress and structural change.

Challenges:

• Scale & feasibility: £18 trillion is several times the UK’s annual GDP. Critics point to the practical difficulty of raising that sum and distributing it fairly.

• Eligibility and definition: The proposal calls for ALL Black British people to be eligible, regardless of direct ancestral ties to slavery. This raises questions about who qualifies and how lineage is determined.

• Causation and attribution: Establishing a direct causal link between involvement in the slave trade centuries ago and current racial disparities is complex, opens debates about intervening historical factors, and invites push-back from those who argue present conditions have varied origins.

• Precedent and comparability: If Britain pays such reparations, what about other countries with histories of slavery, colonialism, or forced labour? Where is the line drawn? Some critics highlight that African kingdoms and other historical perpetrators are rarely included in such demands.

• Political will and public support: Given the magnitude and contentiousness of the proposal, securing wide political and public support is a major obstacle.

5. My view and why this matters

Lenny Henry’s call is bold and provocative. Whether one agrees with the £18 trillion figure or not, the real value lies in expanding the public conversation about legacy, responsibility, race and justice. The core questions it raises are:

• How much of today’s inequality is rooted in historic injustice, and what is owed today for that?

• What is the appropriate form of reparations: cash payments, institutional reform, educational programmes, debt cancellation, or a combination?

• How do contemporary societies balance acknowledging past harms with present responsibilities and practical constraints?

It matters because ignoring the economic and social consequences of slavery allows structural inequalities to persist unchallenged. Henry’s proposal raises the stakes: if one accepts that slavery has enduring effects, then the question of “what remedy” becomes central, not just whether a remedy is needed.

In short: this is not just about “paying off” a historic debt — it’s about whether society is willing to act on the legacy of that debt in meaningful, measurable ways.

6. Key take-aways

• Lenny Henry proposes £18 trillion in reparations for the UK to pay to Black British people and Caribbean nations, as part of his book The Big Payback.

• He argues the legacy of the transatlantic slave trade underpins contemporary racial injustice and inequality.

• The figure draws on large-scale economic estimates of liability for Western countries, but is seen by many as impractical and symbolic rather than imminently deliverable.

• The proposal has reinvigorated the debate about what reparations should look like, how they might be funded, and who is eligible.

• Whether or not £18 trillion is ever paid, Henry’s intervention shifts the discussion from apology and remembrance to repair and redress.

Attached is a News article regarding Lenny Henry call for 18 trillion over slavery

https://coventryobserver.co.uk/news/sir-lenny-henry-calls-for-slavery-reparations-in-new-book-58333/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Man Steals £450,000 from Jewish Charity and Squanders It on Gambling

A man entrusted with overseeing the finances of a respected Jewish charity has been exposed for stealing nearly £450,000, using the funds to fuel a destructive gambling addiction.

The accused, whose name cannot be disclosed for legal reasons, was a long-serving administrator for the charity, which supports vulnerable Jewish families and provides food, education, and housing assistance across London and the South East. Over a period of several years, he allegedly siphoned large sums of money from donation accounts and grant funds, transferring them into personal betting accounts.

According to investigators, the man meticulously covered his tracks by falsifying records, forging receipts, and exploiting the trust of the charity’s management. The missing funds only came to light after an internal audit revealed “serious discrepancies” in the financial statements.

Charity officials said the theft had caused “significant harm” to the organisation’s ability to deliver its community services. “This was not just a betrayal of trust—it was a betrayal of the people we serve,” a spokesperson said. “Donors gave in good faith to help struggling families, not to line the pockets of someone gambling away their futures.”

Court documents revealed that the stolen money was spent primarily on online casinos and sports betting platforms, with little evidence of any being recovered. The defendant reportedly admitted to gambling daily, losing control over his addiction as the financial hole deepened.

Detectives from the Metropolitan Police’s Economic Crime Command described the case as a “calculated abuse of position.” One officer stated: “This was not a single lapse in judgment—it was a systematic theft that drained charitable funds meant for those in real need.”

The man is due to be sentenced next month and faces a potential prison term. The charity has since implemented stricter financial oversight measures and called for greater accountability standards across the nonprofit sector.

The case has sent shockwaves through the community, serving as a stark reminder of how trust and transparency must be vigilantly protected—especially in institutions built on generosity and faith.

Attached is a News article regarding the impact of stealing the from charity

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f1929ed915d74e62285fb/Fraud_strategy.pdf

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561