Saturday, 1 November 2025

Smileband News



The uk government are in a stage of collapse through lack of leadership in the correct manner, as people today in the uk find ways of making money from actions that can not support there life, young people are on the rise out of schools and the lack of jobs that can fill the amount of people out of work which are not there, it’s a matter of causing an alarm of distress that can impact mental health. DANGER!! 

This is a danger to society as a whole, people have been attacked for no reason because of psychological matters regarding mental health, the government need to put them self in the shoes of people who can not find a job, understanding that if they was in this position, they would do any think to find a way to eat or support them self in a matter of distress. 

Job’s don’t fall out of the sky, as the population has increased by a huge amount, they use the word jobs and do not explain what job exist for a large amount of people who are out of work. 

The people in the uk are suffering, as the world is suffering” as a whole, it’s a matter of strong consideration that the government need to take, as the job structure in the uk is broken, as the government need to aim them self on a more intelligent level. 

People life’s are importance, as money is just printed from a machine, the world was made of nothing but people, why give the expressed view of people claiming benefits, then they rise the cost of living and the cost of housing. 

There need to be an important review on the people working in the government, if they know how to do there job and talk in the right correct manner, as a person can find £20-30 pounds a week but that is not a supported wage that can sustain a living. 

The youth every year are living school and the birth rate is on the rise, immigration is continuing to flood the uk, as the government help people, but then have no jobs that can fill positions for immigrants and people born into the United Kingdom. 


The big question today we ask, is the government creating fear in the people, as this is not safe for people who are living there day to day life. 

People have no money to buy stuff that can fuel the growth for the economy, as some businesses open and don’t have no customers supporting their business. 

This is just a open door for show, a comic strip that light up London in a fashion that don’t make sense, does the government have a strategy that can change England, as London is not a huge place for job’s. 

People pay money to involve them self in a job position but then find it is a scam, health is a major problem today, as some people can not work due to their health implications. 

The uk government need to sit down and compare the job opening’s to the amount of people on the rise in the uk out of employment, as its a matter of starvation in some places around the uk. 

The day of when there was jobs that can fill positions, are not as available as it is today, a lot of job require a strong knowledge and understand that a lot of people don’t have, as the companies in the uk are small. 


The majority of people are just in a position of just asking for advice, as they don’t get the right answers’ as it’s a lost path that has no opportunity for a lot of people today. 

Poor people are important and the government needs to see this” as it’s a matter of people committing suicidal actions that shatters families, due to the fact of a poorly run government. 

A lot of food business are opening and don’t make the money, to keep there business running in the right affective manner, investors are coming from aboard and they invest in the uk but people are not rich. 

The government keep on building new train lines and buildings that they can not afford, as this is what is killing society, as a whole, they want the image to look good but they can not afford the life, as it’s all a imaginary psychological nightmare. 

The government today are not educated in the right manner to how they understand how to conduct their manner of speech” explaining matters that are subjected to people. They just want money money money. 


The are like wolfs, as it’s a matter of some business not being able to pay there employees a wage, as the business pays for it self and that is a cost that affects people work in there dead end jobs that ends within a month. 

All the English people who protest on immigration are jobless them self, as this is the reason for they don’t want to work, as immigrants have filled these positions. 

Talking is a big factor in todays government, as we ask’ are they talking sense that adds up, public service jobs are low and people have taken advantage of all opportunities and people who fill low end jobs have been taken up. 

The government need to stop smiling and making assumptions and bring real facts that business can not fill positions that support people who live in the uk as a whole. 

The education standards are low in the uk, they have fallen and people get through the education systems, not knowing what they really need to know about” when they are studying. As universities and colleges are Cheating the educational system. 

The system is being cheated in a big way, as this is with the governments education system for them self,  as they talk and don’t make sense of weighting up the figures. 

people are doing crazy crimes, as it’s all over social media and the government need to focus of the safety of people first before that can see there economy grow too get strong in the right affective manner. 


The government just want to win there seat, as they say anything to win their seat in the House of Commons, as they sight lies and evil progression that has not element to how they make sense of the matter. 

The government needs to talk in the right affective manner and not wait for people to find mental illness. It’s a lost cause that is at the end of a government that can not handle there problems in the right affective manner. 

They use the term job” but they need to more graphical information about the job they are describing in the House of Commons, as the amount of positions that are available don’t exist. 


The uk government are not running in the right manner and don’t have the right stats to justify their augment. 

Running a business cost money and then the support for your self is another matter, why would a person say they got 20-30 pounds and they don’t even have a say in today’s living crisis to support them self, as it cost 20 pound to eat a simple takeaway, as years ago it cost £3.99  

What are the government doing and are they educated in the right manner to even speak on subjects today. 

People are turning to crime to pay them self through the streets or even in big companies doing fraud, taking money off people who are cheated out of money every day. 

Today quality level job’s, people have to be educated on a level that is difficult to obtain, as some people minds can not configure that ability. 

It’s sad that people in the government are not on the streets to see this problem, but are behind the closed doors of there government establishment, were they don’t see any thing. 

The government needs to stop the alarm of distress and understand that this country is stuck in a different state of mind. 

The job centre won’t help get people Jobs no more, as years ago they would work to help people find jobs, now” they just talk for the fun of it with no educated thought of what there job position is at a job centre. 

There is over 1 million people claiming benefits and how is the government going to place these jobs. 

Million is a lot. 

Attached is a news article of the uk government lack of leadership 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c70190e0p6yo.amp

Article written by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Who owns the sky? — A 2025 snapshot of satellites by country

Space is getting crowded. Over the last few years the number of objects placed into Earth orbit has exploded — driven mainly by commercial “megaconstellations” (big fleets of small satellites) and an acceleration in launches from China, the United States and commercial launch providers. Here’s a clear, sourced look at how many satellites are in orbit, which countries host the most, and why the counts vary so much.

The big picture (how many satellites total)

Estimates for total objects in orbit vary by tracker and by whether they count only active satellites or every object (active + defunct + rocket bodies). By spring 2025 independent trackers were reporting on the order of 12,000–15,000 satellites and objects around Earth (active satellites are a subset of that). For example, one industry summary put the global count near 12,149 active satellites in early May 2025, while other summaries that include inactive objects gave totals approaching ~14,900.  


Who has the most satellites

Short answer: The United States — by a large margin. That lead is mainly because of private U.S. companies (most notably SpaceX’s Starlink) in addition to government and military satellites.

United States: The U.S. is the single largest operator/registrant of satellites in orbit. A dominant reason is SpaceX’s Starlink constellation, which — by late October 2025 — had more than ~8,700–8,800 Starlink satellites in orbit (reports and trackers vary slightly day-to-day). Counting all U.S. government and private satellites, the U.S. accounts for the single largest share of satellites in orbit.  

China: China has increased its on-orbit presence rapidly. Multiple tracking summaries in 2025 put China at around 1,000 (to ~1,200) satellites in orbit, a big jump driven by several commercial and government constellations (communications, remote sensing and experimental systems).  

Russia: Russia still operates hundreds of satellites (ranging in public trackers from a few hundred up to ~1,500 when different counting rules are used), but far fewer than the U.S. or China in recent years.  

Other countries: The UK, Japan, France, India, Germany, Canada, Italy and a handful of others each operate tens to several hundreds of satellites. Some countries’ totals rose quickly because they are the home registrant for commercially operated constellations or host companies that register satellites under their national allocation.  

(For a country-by-country snapshot and approximate ranks, see the “Top players” section below.)

Why numbers differ between sources

Different public trackers and reports use different counting rules:

Active vs launched vs registered: Some sources count only active satellites (currently functioning), others count all objects launched (including dead satellites and upper stages), and others list satellites registered to a country (which can differ from the country that built or operates them). That leads to large discrepancies.  

Operator vs country of registration: Many commercial constellations operate under the registration of one country even though they serve global customers. Example: a company headquartered in the U.S. will usually register its satellites to the U.S., increasing that country’s count.  

Rapid launches: 2024–2025 saw hundreds to thousands of small satellites launched (especially by SpaceX and several Chinese companies). The tally can change by hundreds in a single month.  

Top players (approximate, late-2025 snapshot)

Below are rough, sourced estimates (rounded) to give a sense of scale. Exact daily counts differ by tracker; use these as a ballpark snapshot and consult live trackers for day-to-day numbers.

United States: Several thousand satellites; U.S. share is the largest globally thanks to Starlink (Starlink alone had ~8,700–8,800 satellites in orbit by late Oct 2025).  

China: ~1,000–1,200 satellites (rapidly growing through state and private launches).  

Russia: Hundreds (estimates vary by source; older summaries put Russia second or third depending on counting rules).  

United Kingdom: Hundreds (UK-linked satellites increased as commercial operators register assets there).  

Japan, France, India, Germany, Canada, Italy: typically dozens to low hundreds each depending on how the count is compiled.  

Why it matters

Space traffic & debris: More satellites raise the risk of collisions and create long-lasting debris — which endangers other spacecraft and scientific observations.

Spectrum and radio interference: Large constellations use lots of radio spectrum and can affect astronomy and radio-science.

Power & geopolitics: A country’s satellite fleet supports communications, navigation, reconnaissance and commercial services — a strategic advantage in both civil and military domains.  

Where to watch live numbers

If you want day-to-day counts consult live trackers and databases such as:

Jonathan McDowell’s trackers / Planet4589 (frequently updated Starlink stats).  

Industry summaries (Pixalytics, NanoAvionics) and news outlets that track constellation launches.  

The Union of Concerned Scientists maintains a searchable satellite database (its last full public update was earlier, so check their site for the newest release).  

Short takeaway

There are tens of thousands of objects in orbit if you include debris; active satellites number in the low tens of thousands (estimates like ~12,000–15,000 were reported through 2025).  

The United States currently has the most satellites, by a wide margin — largely because of SpaceX’s Starlink — followed by China and then other states.  

Attached is a news article regarding the most country who has the most satellites in space 

https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/top-countries-with-the-highest-number-of-satellites-in-space-2025-1820002598-1

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

What is known: The submarine landslide off the Tagus Delta

In recent geologic research, scientists have mapped a shallow‐water submarine landslide at the mouth of the Tagus delta, off Lisbon.   Key points:

The event is estimated to be about 8 000 years old (8 ky cal BP) and involves a deposit with volume ~0.27 km³, over more than 9 km length and ~3 km width.  

The landslide sits in a shallow shelf region (continental margin) near the Lisbon/Tagus area, making it relevant for coastal hazard assessments.  

The modelling indicates that such an event could generate tsunami waves of roughly 0.8 m at the source region, and up to ~2 m wave heights upon reaching the Lisbon coast in a future scenario.  

So while it isn’t a “sink‐hole” in the sense of a dramatic open crater like one might imagine on land, there has been a major collapse/slide of seabed sediments in that region.

Why some may call it a “sink-hole”

There are a few reasons confusion or “sink‐hole” language arises:

The seabed collapse results in removal or displacement of large volumes of sediment, which can appear as a “hole” in bathymetric data (i.e., the sea floor lowers).

Public discussion may mis‐interpret geological/submarine landslide features as dramatic “holes” or “voids”.

Underwater features are less visible, so any collapse or Slack in sediment might draw dramatic metaphors like “sink‐hole in the sea”.

So the “massive sink‐hole” might reflect a lay description of the mapped submarine slide/stress zone rather than a literal vertical crater.

Significance and hazard for Lisbon & region

Why this matters:

The region is geologically active in terms of slope instability and mass‐wasting. The Tagus delta shelf is relatively narrow and sediments accumulate, making the margin more susceptible to submarine slides.  

Because the slide is shallow (on shelf) and near populous coastal zones (including Lisbon), there is a real tsunami hazard potential: modelling suggests wave propagation toward the coast.  

Coastal infrastructure, tourism, and maritime activities near Lisbon could be impacted in the event of a future similar slide with tsunami generation.

For scientists and policy‐makers, the mapping of such slides helps refine hazard assessments (earthquake + landslide + tsunami chains). For example, the 1531 Lisbon earthquake tsunami may have been linked to a submarine slide along a canyon near Cascais.  

What we don’t know / limitations

There is no documented “sink‐hole” that opened recently in the sea off Lisbon in the sense of a sudden collapse for which public media abound.

The exact timing of future slides is uncertain — though zones of instability are identified, prediction remains challenging.

Public awareness of submarine landslide hazards is lower than for more visible hazards (earthquakes, coastal flooding), so communication is still developing.

What to watch: monitoring and implications

Bathymetric surveys and seismic reflection mapping continue to refine the geometry and volume of submarine slides off the Portuguese margin.

Monitoring of sediment loads from the Tagus delta, river discharge, sea‐level rise, and slope stability all feed into risk models (sea‐level rise can increase tsunami hazard from slides).  

For Lisbon region planners: considering tsunami risk from submarine slides (not just earthquakes) is increasingly part of coastal defence and emergency planning.

Putting it in context: near-shore dramatic collapses vs more visible features

Interestingly, Portugal also has remarkable coastal features that might be mistaken for “sink‐holes”. One example: the dramatic collapsed sea-cave formation called Boca do Inferno (“Mouth of Hell”) just west of Cascais (which is in the Lisbon district).  

Here’s how it compares:

Boca do Inferno is a collapsed limestone sea cave/chasm, formed by erosion and collapse of the roof of a cave.  

It is visually dramatic and near the coast, so for a casual observer it might look like a “sink‐hole” in the rock.

However, it is not the massive submarine slide formerly discussed; it’s near shore and much smaller scale (and above water/just at the sea).

Thus, the “massive sink hole in the sea near Lisbon” you referenced likely refers more closely to the submarine landslide off the Tagus delta (or possibly mis‐attributed to Boca do Inferno), rather than an open large sink‐hole in the sea floor visible at the surface.

Conclusion

In summary:

Yes, there is a significant submarine landslide (and thus an undersea collapse feature) near Lisbon off the Tagus delta, which could be described metaphorically as a “sink‐hole in the sea”.

This feature has important hazard implications (tsunami risk) for Lisbon and surrounding coasts.

But there is no widely reported dramatic crater opening recently in the sea off Lisbon that matches a traditional “sink‐hole” image.

For journalistic or article purposes, you could frame the story as: “Underwater collapse off Lisbon: what it is, what risks it poses, and what it means for the capital’s coastal resilience.”

Attached is a news article regarding the hole sink boat in the ocean near Lisbon 

https://divemagazine.com/scuba-diving-news/orcas-sink-one-boat-damage-another-off-coast-of-portugal

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The world’s poorest countries in 2025 — by GDP per capita (PPP)

When you talk about the “poorest” countries in the world you need to be clear which yardstick you’re using. Economists usually report GDP per capita in two ways: nominal (current U.S. dollars, not adjusted for cost of living) and PPP (purchasing-power-parity, which adjusts for local prices and is generally better for comparing living standards). Many recent rankings of the poorest countries use GDP per capita (PPP) because it gives a clearer picture of how far incomes actually go inside a country.  

Below is a snapshot of the countries with the lowest GDP per capita (PPP) in 2025 and the structural reasons behind their persistent poverty.

The list (poorest countries by GDP per capita — 2025, PPP)

Based on recent economic tables and compilers that use IMF/World Bank data and PPP adjustments, the countries with the lowest GDP per capita (PPP) in 2025 include (ranked approximately from lowest upward): South Sudan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Yemen, Mozambique, Malawi, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Liberia, Madagascar. These names routinely appear at the bottom of international PPP per-capita lists in 2025.  

Quick notes on a few of them

South Sudan: Years of conflict, breakdown of public services, and hyperinflation have pushed income measures to rock-bottom levels.  

Burundi: Chronic underinvestment, weak institutions, shrinking foreign aid and climate-driven food shocks have produced severe poverty and humanitarian needs.  

Central African Republic (CAR): Political instability and conflict block growth and investment; extractive resources are present but governance failures limit benefits to ordinary people.  

Yemen: A brutal civil war has wrecked the economy, producing widespread famine and dislocation despite pre-war oil revenues.  

Why these countries remain so poor

Poverty at the national level is driven by a mix of overlapping factors — many of which these countries share:

1. Conflict and fragility. Active wars, insurgencies or prolonged instability destroy infrastructure, displace people and deter investment. Many of the lowest-ranked countries are in this category.  

2. Weak institutions and governance. Corruption, poorly functioning public services, and opaque resource management reduce the capacity of states to deliver education, health and infrastructure.  

3. Climate vulnerability and agricultural shocks. Where most income comes from rain-fed smallholder farming, droughts, floods and land degradation push people back into destitution.  

4. Debt and financing constraints. The World Bank and IMF have warned that the world’s poorest group of countries entered the mid-2020s with high debt burdens and limited fiscal space, making it hard to invest in development.  

5. Limited access to markets and low diversification. Economies dependent on a tiny range of commodities (or on aid) are subject to price swings and have trouble scaling up higher-value activity.  

A worrying trend: many of the poorest are worse off than before COVID

Recent international reporting and the World Bank have flagged that a core group of some 20–30 poorest countries — largely in sub-Saharan Africa, plus Afghanistan and Yemen — are in the weakest financial shape in decades. Per-capita incomes in that group remain under roughly $1,100 per year (in many cases much less), leaving entire populations extremely vulnerable to economic shocks, climate disasters and spikes in food prices.  

Paths out of extreme poverty — realistic, but slow

Development experts repeat familiar prescriptions: improved governance, expanded access to education and health, investments in resilient agriculture and infrastructure, and debt relief or better financing terms. For fragile states, peacebuilding and security are prerequisites. International support — both from multilateral lenders and donor countries — remains crucial, but long-term progress requires domestic reforms that broaden the political constituency for investment in human capital.  

Caveats and how these rankings are used

Different metrics, different pictures. Rankings by nominal GDP per capita (market exchange rates) can reorder countries compared with PPP rankings. PPP is preferred for assessing living standards, nominal for comparing currency-valued output. Always check which metric a list uses.  

Data gaps. Some fragile states have poor statistical systems; estimates can be revised substantially as new data (or better methods) arrive. That means the bottom ranks are indicative, not absolute.  

Bottom line

In 2025 the poorest countries — most of them in sub-Saharan Africa and conflict-affected parts of the Middle East — continue to face a tangle of conflict, weak institutions, climate shocks and debt that suppress incomes and keep people in extreme poverty. The international community can help with financing and technical assistance, but sustainable change will require safer, more accountable governments and economies that create opportunities beyond subsistence agriculture or single-commodity dependence.  

Attached is a news article regarding the poorest countries by GDP per capita in 2025 

https://gfmag.com/data/economic-data/poorest-country-in-the-world/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36





Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Introduction

Reports have emerged claiming that France and Real Madrid forward Kylian MbappĂ© has donated £20 million to Jamaica. The story, if true, would mark one of the most significant individual charitable contributions in football in recent years. However, a close examination reveals that while MbappĂ© has a well-documented charitable record, we could not find reliable evidence to confirm the specific donation figure or the recipient country of Jamaica in this case.

This article therefore explores:

what we do know about MbappĂ©’s philanthropy;

the claims surrounding this alleged donation to Jamaica;

reasons to treat the story with caution;

and what implications such a donation would have.

MbappĂ©’s Known Charitable Activity

Mbappé has repeatedly shown a commitment to giving back:

In 2018, at age 19, he pledged to donate his entire World Cup earnings to the children’s charity Premiers de CordĂ©e, which supports hospitalised and disabled children.  

During the COVID-19 crisis, the forward made a “very large donation” to the AbbĂ© Pierre Foundation to support homeless people and others in precarious circumstances.  

He also gives his time, serving as an ambassador for children’s sport programmes and engaging personally with children.  

These examples highlight that MbappĂ© is indeed philanthropic. That said, none of the published, verified charitable efforts link to a £20 million donation to Jamaica.

The Jamaica Donation Claim – What’s the Story

The claim states that MbappĂ© has donated £20 million to Jamaica. On investigation:

We found no credible mainstream source (sports media, philanthropy reports, Jamaican national press) verifying the donation or specifying projects in Jamaica.

The Jamaican press does mention MbappĂ© in other contexts but not in relation to a £20 million contribution. For example, a report on a fraud probe involving MbappĂ© and payments to French police officers mentions nothing about Jamaica.  

Given MbappĂ©’s profile and the size of the alleged donation, a transaction of this scale would likely have been widely reported and documented.

Therefore, while it remains possible the donation occurred, the claim currently lacks substantiation.

Reasons for Skepticism

Here are some key reasons why this claim should be met with caution:

1. Absence of credible verification – no official statement from MbappĂ©, his foundation/management or Jamaican authorities that publicly acknowledges the gift.

2. Magnitude of the sum – a £20 million donation is very large. For context, his known public donations have been significant, but not publicly reported at that scale or to Jamaica.

3. Typical pattern of MbappĂ©’s giving – his documented philanthropy tends to focus on children, sports access, and France/Europe rather than large direct country-wide transfers to Caribbean nations.

4. Potential for misreporting – charitable stories around high-profile athletes often become exaggerated or misattributed (e.g., amount inflated, beneficiary changed).

5. No Jamaican media corroboration – if such a donation took place, one would expect commentary from Jamaican charities, government bodies or local media recognising the gift.

What If the Donation Were True — Impact and Considerations

Assuming, hypothetically, the £20 million donation to Jamaica were real, the implications would be substantial:

Economic/Development impact: The funds could support education, youth sport, infrastructure or community health in Jamaica. A contribution of this size could initiate long-term projects.

Reputational benefits: For Mbappé, the donation would further solidify his philanthropic legacy and global impact beyond football. For Jamaica, it would bring international attention and possibly partnerships.

Operational questions: How would the funds be administered? Via a charity, trust, government agency or partnership? How would transparency and accountability be handled?

Sustainability: A one-off donation is valuable, but sustained engagement (programmes, local partners) often yields stronger outcomes.

Public/Media narrative: Such a donation would probably generate follow-up stories around implementation, progress, and the beneficiaries.

Conclusion & Recommendation

In summary:

Kylian Mbappé is genuinely philanthropic and has made meaningful donations and commitments in the past.

The specific claim that he donated £20 million to Jamaica is not backed by credible, publicly-accessible sources at this time.

If you’re writing an article or piece about this, you should clearly state that the claim remains unverified and provide the context of his previous philanthropy.

You may also consider contacting MbappĂ©’s foundation, his management, or Jamaican charitable organisations/government to seek confirmation or clarification before presenting it as fact.

Attached is a news article regarding kylian mbappe donating 20 million to Jamaica

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQgw0sKEcYm/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Tragic Case of Soldier Found Hanged Sparks Outrage Over Posthumous Abuse Allegations

A young soldier’s death has sent shockwaves through both the military and the public after reports emerged that she was not only found hanged in her barracks room but was also subjected to abuse after her death. The deeply disturbing incident has prompted calls for justice, transparency, and reform within the armed forces.

The soldier, whose identity has not yet been publicly released pending notification of family members, was discovered by colleagues during a routine morning check. Initial reports suggested suicide, but the case quickly took a darker turn when evidence surfaced that her body had been tampered with and that she may have suffered severe mistreatment even after her passing.

Military investigators have now launched a full inquiry into both the circumstances of her death and the alleged abuse that followed. Officials have described the scene as “deeply distressing” and confirmed that a special investigative unit is handling the case to ensure independence from local command structures.

Witnesses within the base have reported hearing distressing noises and raised concerns about the soldier’s welfare in the days before her death. One anonymous servicemember claimed she had complained about harassment and bullying, saying, “She tried to get help, but no one listened.”

The case has reignited debate about the culture within certain military environments, where issues such as harassment, sexism, and abuse of power have repeatedly surfaced. Advocacy groups are now demanding stronger protections for female soldiers and a transparent review of the chain of command’s handling of her complaints.

A statement from the Ministry of Defence expressed condolences to the soldier’s family and pledged a “thorough and uncompromising” investigation. “This tragedy is unacceptable. Any form of abuse, before or after death, is a betrayal of military values and human decency,” the statement read.

Her family, devastated by the news, have called for justice and truth about what really happened. They described her as a “bright, determined young woman who dreamed of serving her country with pride.”

As the investigation continues, the military faces growing pressure to address longstanding issues of mental health support, gender-based violence, and institutional accountability. The case has become a painful reminder that even in service to their nation, some soldiers are not adequately protected from harm — in life or in death.

Attached is a news article regarding a solider who was abused after her death and found hang in her room 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/oct/31/ex-sergeant-major-sexual-assault-soldier-jaysley-beck

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Rising Threat of Zombie Batteries: How Hidden Power Cells Are Fueling Fires Across the UK

Across the UK, an invisible danger is sparking hundreds of fires every year — zombie batteries. These are discarded batteries that still hold a residual charge, and when improperly thrown away with household rubbish or recycling, they can ignite devastating blazes in waste collection vehicles, recycling plants, and landfill sites.

What Are Zombie Batteries

Zombie batteries are old lithium-ion or alkaline batteries that appear dead but still contain enough stored energy to cause harm. When crushed, punctured, or exposed to heat, they can short-circuit, leading to explosions or fires. Common sources include everyday items such as e-cigarettes, laptops, mobile phones, and power tools — all of which contain rechargeable cells that don’t fully discharge even after years of use.

Fires on the Rise

The Environmental Services Association (ESA) estimates that zombie batteries cause over 200 fires in waste facilities each year, costing councils and taxpayers millions of pounds in damage. In many cases, these fires spread rapidly because of the highly flammable materials stored in recycling centres. Some incidents have led to complete destruction of facilities, disruptions in local waste services, and severe environmental contamination.

In London alone, fire crews have reported a steady increase in battery-related incidents, with lithium-ion cells now responsible for a large percentage of fires in waste and recycling operations. The problem is compounded by the growing popularity of electric devices and power banks, which are being discarded at unprecedented rates.

Environmental and Safety Concerns

Once a zombie battery catches fire, it releases toxic smoke and heavy metals into the air. The gases from burning lithium-ion cells — including carbon monoxide, hydrogen fluoride, and other volatile compounds — pose serious health risks to workers and nearby communities. Additionally, extinguishing these fires is notoriously difficult, as damaged batteries can reignite hours or even days later.

The Push for Proper Disposal

Recycling organisations and local councils are urging the public to dispose of batteries correctly. Many supermarkets, electronics stores, and local recycling centres now offer designated battery drop-off points. The UK’s “Take Charge” campaign, launched by the ESA, encourages consumers to store used batteries in a separate container and deliver them safely to collection points — rather than tossing them into general waste.

A Call for Greater Awareness

As the demand for battery-powered technology continues to rise — from electric vehicles to smart home devices — the risk posed by zombie batteries will only increase. Industry experts are calling for clearer labelling, improved recycling infrastructure, and public education campaigns to prevent avoidable fires.

Every household has a role to play in tackling this growing issue. By simply removing batteries from old electronics and recycling them properly, Britons can help stop zombie batteries from turning waste bins and recycling plants into ticking time bombs.

In short: one careless throw can spark a fire — but one small act of recycling can save lives, money, and the environment.

Attached is a news article regarding zombies battery’s dangers 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/moment-vape-zombie-battery-comes-36159512.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Friday, 31 October 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Raid on Rio’s Favelas Leaves At Least 119 Dead

A massive police operation in Rio de Janeiro has triggered a major human-rights and security crisis, leaving at least 119 people dead, including four police officers, according to official state reports.  

Here are the key facts, the context, and the questions it raises.

What happened

On Tuesday, a large-scale raid was launched in two of Rio’s northern favelasComplexo do Alemao and Complexo da Penha, targeting the criminal group Comando Vermelho (Red Command).  

Around 2,500 police and military personnel took part, deploying helicopters, armoured vehicles, drones, and executing arrest/search warrants.  

The state police confirmed 119 dead (including 4 police officers) though the state public defender’s office says the number may be as high as 132.  

The operation reportedly led to 113 arrests and the seizure of 118 weapons and over a ton of drugs.  

Schools in the area were closed and normal life disrupted. Residents collected bodies in the streets and expressed outrage.  


Why it matters

It is the deadliest police operation in Rio’s history and among the most lethal ever in Brazil.  

The scale and intensity highlight how entrenched criminal control is in the favelas, and how the state is escalating its tactics.

It brings to the fore critical issues: law enforcement tactics, human rights, urban inequality, and the state’s strategy towards crime.

It has sparked political fallout: rights groups, the United Nations, and local activists are calling for independent investigations.  

Key voices & reactions

The state governor, Cláudio Castro, described the operation as a “historic day in the fight against crime” and claimed that the only “real victims” were the police officers.  

The public defender’s office challenged the official count, pressed for access to forensic evidence, and suggested that some deaths may have been unjustified.  

Human rights organisations cautioned that many of those killed appear to have been executed or summarily killed, raising grave concerns of unlawful killings.  

Questions & concerns

Civilian casualties: How many of those killed were actively involved in criminal activity, and how many may have been caught up as bystanders or non-combatants? Some residents say bodies showed signs of execution: bound limbs, shots to the back of the head.  

Use of force: Was the scale of firepower and the tactics used proportionate? The presence of heavy military equipment in poor urban communities raises questions of militarised policing.

Accountability & transparency: Will there be independent investigations? Will forensic evidence be examined and made public? Will families receive justice?

Long-term impact: Will this operation weaken the criminal network or further alienate communities? Such high casualty raids can generate fear, but also resentment and exploitation by gangs.

International implications: Brazil is preparing for major international engagements and is under scrutiny for human rights. This raid raises questions about its policing model on the global stage.  

What next

The public defender’s office has requested access to forensic evidence and has asked the country’s supreme court to intervene.  

Protests have been called by labour unions, human rights groups and political parties near the Penha favela complex demanding the removal of Governor Castro and investigations into the operation.  

A Senate committee is reportedly launching a probe into major criminal networks and may include this operation in its inquiry.  

On the ground, residents will live with the aftermath: trauma, suspicion of policing, potential reprisals by gang members, and the question of what security means in their communities.

Broader context

The criminal gang targeted, Comando Vermelho, has long been a powerful actor in Rio’s favelas, controlling territory, exerting influence, challenging state authority.  

Ago-long debate in Brazil: how to address favela violence—through aggressive raids or through social programmes, policing reform and investment? This operation clearly leans into the aggressive side.

This comes as Brazil gears up for international events and sees rising public demand for security, creating political incentives for “show-force” operations.  

Conclusion

The brutal raid in Rio de Janeiro is a stark symbol of the collision between the state and the underground power structures of the favelas. While authorities frame it as a victory against organised crime, the enormous death toll, the allegations of summary executions, and the shock waves through the community raise urgent ethical, legal and political questions. As the investigations unfold, the world will be watching whether Brazil chooses reform or reprisal — and whether for the people living in the favelas it becomes a turning point or another chapter in a cycle of violence.

Attached is a news article regarding 119 people in Rio killed as police raid as major fight incur 

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/119-dead-in-deadly-rio-raid/3730126

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband

Ross Kemp Mourns the Loss of His Father in an Emotional Time for the Actor

British actor and documentary maker Ross Kemp is mourning the death of his father, marking a deeply emotional and personal time for the beloved star. Kemp, known for his powerful portrayals on screen and his fearless work as a journalist, has been left heartbroken following the passing of the man he often described as his “biggest influence.”

The 60-year-old actor, best known for his iconic role as Grant Mitchell in EastEnders and his award-winning series Ross Kemp on Gangs, shared that his father had been a constant source of strength and inspiration throughout his life. Those close to Kemp say he has been spending quiet time with family, reflecting on the man who shaped much of his character both on and off screen.


Kemp’s father, a devoted family man, was said to have instilled in Ross a strong sense of discipline and moral integrity—traits that would later define his career. Friends of the actor say that even during his most dangerous assignments filming documentaries in war-torn regions, Kemp would often speak of his father’s advice to “always keep your head, no matter how hard it gets.”

Fans and fellow actors have taken to social media to express their condolences and offer support. Many have praised Kemp for his resilience and honesty over the years, both as a performer and as a reporter bringing attention to real-world issues others often avoid.

While Kemp has not made a formal public statement yet, sources close to him say he is “deeply saddened but grateful for the memories and the values his father passed down.”

As the nation offers its sympathy, Ross Kemp’s loss is a reminder that even those who seem strongest in the public eye face personal heartbreak behind the scenes. For the actor who has spent years telling the stories of others, this moment marks one of deep personal reflection — a time to remember the man who helped make him who he is today.

Attached is a news article regarding Ross kemp father passing away 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/showbiz-news/ross-kemp-sent-love-announces-32783507.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Bill Gates: The Billionaire Who Keeps Giving Back to a World in Crisis

Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and one of the most influential philanthropists of our time, continues to dedicate a vast portion of his wealth to helping people across the globe. As the world faces increasing crises — from poverty and disease to climate change and education inequality — Gates has remained steadfast in his mission to use his fortune to create lasting, positive change.

Through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, founded in 2000, Gates has already donated over $50 billion, making it one of the largest private charitable organizations in history. The foundation’s efforts focus on global health, education, and poverty alleviation, particularly in developing countries where access to resources is limited.

Fighting Disease and Saving Lives

One of the foundation’s most impactful areas has been in global health, where Gates has helped fund vaccination programs that have saved millions of lives. His foundation has contributed billions toward eradicating diseases such as polio, malaria, and HIV/AIDS, partnering with the World Health Organization and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. His belief that “every life has equal value” drives the mission to ensure that even the poorest communities receive access to healthcare.


Supporting Education and Equality

In the United States and beyond, Gates has focused on improving education systems, supporting innovative teaching programs, digital learning, and scholarships for underprivileged students. His foundation also funds research into gender equality and women’s empowerment, emphasizing that education is the cornerstone of opportunity and progress.

Tackling Climate Change

More recently, Gates has become a prominent voice in the fight against climate change, investing heavily in green technology and sustainable energy solutions. His book “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster” outlines practical strategies to reduce global carbon emissions and support clean innovation. Through his investments in companies developing zero-emission technologies, Gates aims to create a future where economic growth and environmental responsibility coexist.

Giving Pledge: Inspiring Other Billionaires

In 2010, Gates co-founded The Giving Pledge with Warren Buffett, an initiative encouraging the world’s wealthiest individuals to commit at least half their fortunes to philanthropic causes. The movement has since inspired over 200 billionaires worldwide to follow suit — a testament to Gates’s enduring influence and moral leadership.

A Legacy of Compassion

While critics often debate the role of billionaires in global issues, few can deny the scale of Gates’s impact. His commitment to solving humanity’s toughest challenges has reshaped modern philanthropy and offered hope in a world too often defined by crisis and inequality.

As global instability and humanitarian emergencies continue to unfold, Bill Gates stands as a reminder that wealth, when used with purpose, can transform millions of lives. His vision remains clear: a healthier, more equal world where opportunity is not determined by birth, but by shared compassion and human progress.

Attached is a news article regarding bill losing most of his wealth help the people in need 

 
Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36
















Smileband News

Dear 222 Mews viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Kieran Hayler Appears in Court Over Historic Rape Charges Former model and television person...