Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Saddam Hussein ‘Requested to Watch The Passion of the Christ Before His Execution’ – A Remarkable Claim Re-Emerges

A striking and controversial claim has resurfaced in recent discussions about the final days of Saddam Hussein — that the former Iraqi dictator allegedly requested to watch Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ shortly before his execution in December 2006.

While the Iraqi government at the time released only minimal details about Hussein’s final hours, several U.S. military personnel involved in guarding him have previously spoken publicly about his behaviour on death row. Among the more unusual claims is that Saddam developed a fascination with films during his captivity, including Mel Gibson’s 2004 biblical epic depicting the final hours of Jesus Christ.

A Quiet and Curious Final Request

According to these accounts, Saddam Hussein — once one of the most feared and authoritarian leaders in the Middle East — was said to have asked his American guards if he could watch The Passion of the Christ, a film known for its intense depictions of suffering, sacrifice, and redemption.

Those who made the claim noted that Saddam appeared intrigued by the film’s religious themes and its portrayal of loyalty, betrayal, and destiny. Although there is no official confirmation from Iraqi authorities, the story has persisted due to its unusual nature and the insights it may offer into Saddam’s mental state in the days before his death.

Life on Death Row

During his imprisonment, several U.S. soldiers described the former president as surprisingly calm, talkative, and even reflective. He reportedly spent long stretches reading, writing, and discussing politics, history, and religion with his guards.

The claim about The Passion of the Christ has often been linked to broader descriptions of Saddam’s behaviour:

• He was said to enjoy philosophical conversations.

• He frequently discussed faith and morality.

• He was known to ask for books and films to occupy his time.

Nevertheless, the exact details of what he watched or requested remain largely unverified, as the Iraqi government tightly controlled information around his trial, imprisonment, and execution.

Symbolism and Speculation

Why The Passion of the Christ?

Some analysts argue that Saddam, who styled himself as a strongman and martyr-like defender of Iraq, may have been drawn to the film’s themes of persecution. Others believe it was simply part of his curiosity about Western culture during captivity.

Religious scholars have also suggested that even though Saddam was not regarded as deeply devout during his rule, the psychological weight of impending death often pushes individuals toward spiritual reflection, making the choice of film plausible.

Historical Ambiguity Remains

While the story continues to circulate — often revived in interviews, memoirs, and online discussions — there has never been a formal confirmation. It remains one of many curious anecdotes surrounding Saddam Hussein’s fall from power and his final hours.

Whether true or not, the idea of one of the 20th century’s most notorious leaders requesting to watch a film about suffering and redemption adds another layer of complexity to a figure whose life and death continue to fascinate the world.

Attached is a news article regarding saddam Hussein watching passion of Christ before his execution film 

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335345/trivia/?item=tr5642458

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trinidad and Tobago Caught in the Crossfire of Trump’s Escalating Drug War Against Venezuela

Trinidad and Tobago—long regarded as one of the Caribbean’s most stable democracies—now finds itself increasingly entangled in a geopolitical storm brewing between the United States and Venezuela. As former U.S. President Donald Trump intensifies his renewed “drug war” strategy against Nicolás Maduro’s government, regional analysts warn that the small twin-island nation is emerging as an unintended victim of rising tensions, shifting trafficking routes, and aggressive foreign policy.

A Strategic Location Becomes a Strategic Liability

Trinidad sits just seven miles off the Venezuelan coastline, a proximity that has always shaped its security and economic landscape. Traditionally, the two nations have enjoyed strong cultural and commercial ties, with migration and trade flowing back and forth for decades.

But Trump’s revived hardline approach toward Venezuela—framed as a crackdown on narcotics trafficking and “criminal networks aligned with the Maduro regime”—has pushed cartels, smugglers, and desperate migrants to redirect their activities into the nearest accessible territory: Trinidad.

Security officials report increasing concerns that the islands are being used as a transit point as traffickers attempt to evade U.S.-backed surveillance in Venezuelan waters. Fishing boats, small skiffs, and covert night crossings have surged in recent months, placing enormous pressure on Trinidad’s coast guard and law enforcement agencies.

Rising Crime and Pressure on Local Communities

Local authorities warn that the spillover effects are already visible. Communities along the southwestern peninsula—such as Cedros, Icacos, and Point Fortin—have seen a spike in illegal entries, refugee arrivals, and maritime interceptions.

Some residents report hearing boat engines late into the night, while others say they fear an uptick in gang-linked activity connected to smuggling operations. Police intelligence units caution that the presence of foreign criminal networks could escalate turf conflicts and increase the flow of illegal firearms into the local market.

The government of Trinidad and Tobago has insisted that it is committed to maintaining border integrity, but officials privately admit that the sheer scale of regional instability makes the challenge increasingly difficult.

Diplomatic Strain and U.S. Pressure

Washington’s renewed focus on Venezuela has indirectly placed Trinidad under diplomatic scrutiny. Trump advisers have reportedly pushed Caribbean nations to adopt harsher stances against Maduro, leading to concerns that Trinidad’s traditionally neutral position will be interpreted as non-cooperation.

Energy analysts note that the U.S. has frowned upon Trinidad’s past LNG and fuel agreements involving Venezuelan gas fields. With Trump once again vocal about “squeezing the regime,” there is worry within Port of Spain that the islands could face economic pressure or be lumped into broader regional enforcement sweeps.

Humanitarian Fallout: Venezuelan Migrants Caught in the Middle

As the Venezuelan crisis deepens, thousands of families fleeing poverty and political turmoil continue to risk the dangerous crossing to Trinidad. Trump’s renewed anti-Maduro campaign threatens to push even more civilians into unstable maritime journeys, with Trinidad bearing the consequences.

Local NGOs report shelters at capacity, limited resources for asylum seekers, and rising tensions between migrants and local residents who feel overwhelmed by the sudden demographic pressures.

Calls for a Regional Strategy

Trinidad’s leaders are urging the international community to recognize that punitive actions against Venezuela often create ripple effects across the smaller, more vulnerable Caribbean states. They stress the need for coordinated maritime security, humanitarian assistance programmes, and diplomatic balance—rather than forcing Trinidad into the front line of a geopolitical clash it did not create.

Regional security experts agree that unless a broader Caribbean strategy is developed, Trinidad risks becoming the “buffer zone” between U.S. aggression and Venezuelan instability—a position that could jeopardize its safety, economy, and long-term social cohesion.

A Nation Caught Between Two Giants

With Trump’s agenda accelerating and Venezuela’s crisis deepening, Trinidad and Tobago stands at a dangerous crossroads. Its geography, once a blessing for trade and cultural exchange, has quickly become a fault line in an escalating drug war.

For many in Port of Spain, the hope now is that diplomacy—not force—prevails. Because as two powerful nations continue their confrontation, it is the small islands in between that risk paying the highest price.

Attached is a news article regarding Trinidad becoming a victim of trumps drug war against Venezuela 

https://youtu.be/zJkcaiJV0z4

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Deadly High-Rise Fire Rocks Hong Kong: What Happened at Wang Fuk Court

What Happened — The Blaze

On the afternoon of 26 November 2025, a ferocious fire broke out at Wang Fuk Court, a residential estate in the northern Hong Kong district of Tai Po. The complex comprises eight high-rise towers built in the 1980s, together housing nearly 2,000 flats — accommodating around 4,600 to 5,000 residents.  

The blaze reportedly began around 2:51 pm, on external scaffolding and green mesh wrapping one block under renovation. Within hours, flames spread rapidly — fueled by bamboo scaffolding, construction netting, and possibly flammable insulative materials — engulfing up to seven of the eight towers. Black smoke and roaring flames filled the sky, visible for miles.  

Fire crews upgraded the alarm to the highest severity (Level 5) as heat and toxic smoke made rescue efforts increasingly difficult. By early the following morning, four of the blocks were declared under control, but several buildings were still burning or too dangerous to enter.  

Human Cost — Death, Destruction, Displacement

The blaze has become the deadliest residential fire in Hong Kong in decades. As of the latest official reports:

• At least 44 people have been confirmed dead — including one firefighter.  

• Around 45 people remain in critical condition in hospital, with many more injured.  

• Approximately 279 residents are still unaccounted for, presumed missing.  

• Nearly 900 people have been evacuated to temporary shelters, many having lost their homes and personal belongings.  

Residents described hearing a loud bang prior to the fire’s ignition. As flames spread, many rushed from door to door, banging on neighbours’ doors to alert them — there had reportedly been no functioning fire alarm. One survivor recalled the fire spreading “so quickly,” and that attempts to fight it were insufficient given the scale.  

What Went Wrong — Renovations, Scaffolding, and Negligence. 

Although investigations are ongoing, authorities have highlighted several factors that may have contributed to the tragedy:

• The buildings were under renovation, surrounded by bamboo scaffolding and green mesh — materials that readily fuelled the spread of fire.  

• In the building not yet affected, police found windows sealed with foam insulation material, and plastic nets and film applied throughout — all of which may not meet fire-resistance standards.  

• Three men — two company directors and an engineering consultant from the renovation firm — have been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter and gross negligence. Police allege their decisions led to the uncontrollable spread of fire and massive casualties.  

Fire authorities, residents and safety experts have likened the disaster to the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire in London, underlining how dangerous combustible renovation materials can be in high-density housing.  

Aftermath: Rescue, Investigation, and Public Backlash

The tragedy has triggered a massive rescue and relief operation. More than 700 firefighters, 128 fire engines and dozens of ambulances were deployed amid difficult conditions — intense heat, thick smoke and falling debris hampered efforts.  

Authorities set up temporary shelters for displaced residents, while neighbours, volunteers and community groups scrambled to provide food, aid and emotional support. The fire also drew sharp criticism from survivors and wider public, condemning what many see as cost-cutting and neglect of safety regulations. 

From the political side, the disaster arrives just before a major election cycle — raising fresh questions over building regulation, affordable housing safety, and the state’s oversight of renovation work. 

Broader Significance — Safety, Inequality, and Regretful Lessons

The sheer scale of human tragedy at Wang Fuk Court reflects deeper structural pressures in Hong Kong:

• Housing density and affordability crisis — High-rise estates like Wang Fuk Court are part of the city’s subsidised housing system, meant to offer affordable homes. Yet aging buildings often require renovation — which, as this fire shows, can be a perilous necessity if done under lax safety standards.

• Regulation and oversight failures — The blaze highlights how renovation practices (scaffolding choice, insulation materials, fire safety compliance) can become critical, life-or-death issues when applied to large high-rise estates.

• Social inequalities and vulnerability — Many residents were long-term tenants, low- or middle-income households who may have had limited choice — underlining how tragedy disproportionately affects the most vulnerable.

• Urgent need for change — The disaster may catalyse stricter building-safety reforms, better oversight of renovation firms, and renewed investment in fire prevention and affordable, safe housing.

What Happens Next?

Investigations into the cause and accountability are already underway. The arrests of the three individuals linked to the renovation company hint at potential legal consequences. Meanwhile, rescue and support operations continue — with thousands displaced, survivors grieving, and community solidarity forming.

Attached is a news article regarding burning flats in Hong Kong at least 55 dead 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c2emg1kj1klt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Two National Guard members shot near the White House — what we know so far

In a shocking incident on November 26, 2025, two members of the West Virginia National Guard were shot just blocks from the White House in Washington, D.C. The event has ignited national concern — both over the safety of deployed troops on U.S. streets, and over immigration and security policy.  

What happened

• The shooting occurred around 2:15 p.m. ET near 17th and I Street NW, close to the Farragut West station — just two blocks from the White House.  

• According to law enforcement, the suspect — believed to be acting alone — “rounded a corner” and opened fire, ambushing the Guard members who were on a “high-visibility patrol.”  

• Both soldiers were critically wounded. A third person — the suspected shooter — was also shot during the response and is now in custody.  

Witnesses described chaotic scenes: people fleeing the area, police tape, helicopters landing, and emergency crews treating victims on sidewalks and in ambulances.  

Who is the suspect — and how authorities are reacting

• The suspect has been identified as a 29-year-old Afghan national, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who entered the United States in 2021 under a refugee-resettlement pathway.  

• Lakanwal was granted asylum in April 2025.  

• Authorities are treating the shooting as an apparent “targeted attack.” Federal agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Secret Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) responded to the scene and launched an investigation. 

As of now, no confirmed motive has been publicly released. Officials say more investigation is needed.  

Immediate consequences — security and political fallout

• The shooting triggered an immediate lockdown of the White House complex, with nearby buildings locked down, restricted pedestrian movement, and heightened security for hours.  

• In reaction — and at the request of the Donald J. Trump administration — the United States Department of Defense ordered the deployment of an additional 500 National Guard troops to Washington, D.C.  

• The shooting has reignited debates over the presence of National Guard troops in civilian policing roles, and the broader policies around immigration, asylum, and security. Critics warn against painting all immigrants with the same brush, while others argue for tighter vetting and security measures.  

Why this matters — bigger picture

This shooting strikes at the heart of growing tensions in the United States around military involvement in domestic security, immigration policy, and public safety. The presence of National Guard troops in the capital — originally deployed under an emergency order by Trump — has already sparked legal challenges and public debate.  

The suspect’s background — as an Afghan national admitted under a resettlement program — will likely fuel political arguments on vetting and asylum policy. In turn, the government’s response may lead to tougher immigration enforcement, while civil-liberties advocates warn against stigmatization and broad reprisals.

Finally, for the security establishment, the attack raises urgent questions about how to protect uniformed troops and civilians alike, especially in high-visibility roles near sensitive sites such as the White House.

Attached is a news article regarding two national guards members shot near the White House 

https://news.sky.com/story/two-national-guard-members-shot-near-white-house-13474925

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Georgia Drops Election-Interference Case Against Trump

In a major development on 26 November 2025, the state of Georgia formally dismissed the high-profile election-interference case against former U.S. President Donald J. Trump and more than a dozen of his allies. The decision, ordered by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee after a request by prosecutor Pete Skandalakis, ends one of the most consequential state-level prosecutions related to efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.  

Skandalakis — who assumed control of the case after the original prosecutor, Fani Willis, was disqualified — argued that continuing the case would be “futile and unproductive,” especially given the practical and legal obstacles involved in prosecuting a sitting or recently reinstated president.  

Why the Case Was Dropped

• The prosecution faced serious logistical and legal hurdles. Skandalakis noted that the alleged criminal conduct behind the case was conceived in Washington, D.C., not Georgia — suggesting that the state might not have been the appropriate venue.  

• The case had already been weakened by prior dismissals: in March 2024, six of the original 41 counts were dropped, including three against Trump.  

• Further complications arose after Willis was removed from the case over a conflict of interest — a romantic relationship with her special prosecutor — prompting the appointment of Skandalakis.  

• Skandalakis reportedly was unable to recruit another prosecutor willing to handle the case, and concluded that pressing forward would likely take five to ten years — an impractical timeframe.  

As a result, Judge McAfee’s formal order declared: “The case is hereby dismissed in its entirety.”  

What This Means for Trump — and For the Prosecution

• With this dismissal, the Georgia racketeering case becomes the last remaining criminal case tied to Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 election result.  

• Federal cases against Trump relating to alleged election interference and mishandling classified documents had already been dropped after his re-election earlier this year — following long-standing DOJ policy against prosecuting sitting presidents.  

• As a result, Trump now faces no active criminal prosecutions — a dramatic reversal for a figure who over the past few years carried multiple indictments.  

• For prosecutors and critics, the dismissal marks a sobering moment: a case once widely viewed as a landmark test of accountability for alleged post-election misconduct has been entirely abandoned, largely due to legal, institutional, and practical impediments rather than definitive judicial rejection of the underlying allegations.

Broader Implications for U.S. Justice and Politics

This outcome underscores the complexity and fragility of prosecuting high-stakes political cases in the United States — especially when they involve a former or sitting president. The decision to drop the Georgia case raises difficult questions about whether the criminal-justice system can ever be the right venue for resolving deeply partisan disputes over election legitimacy.

Critics argue the dismissal signals that powerful political actors can escape serious legal scrutiny, particularly when prosecutorial discretion, institutional constraints, and timing all favor delay or withdrawal. Supporters of Trump call the move a vindication, claiming the case was an overreach and politically motivated from the start.

Regardless of perspective, the case’s collapse will leave a lasting imprint on how future election-related prosecutions are viewed and pursued — especially amid growing concerns about political polarization, prosecutorial ethics, and the intersection of law and democratic accountability.

Overall, the formal dropping of the Georgia case marks a dramatic, and perhaps final, chapter in the 2020 election-related criminal prosecutions against Donald J. Trump. It reinforces how legal, constitutional and institutional barriers can shape — and in some cases obstruct — even the highest-profile attempts at accountability.

Attached is a news article regarding Donald trump election interference case dropped in Georgia 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/26/us/trump-georgia-election-racketeering.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The passing of Joan Templeman, wife of Richard Branson

The world learned on 25 November 2025 that Joan Templeman — the wife of British billionaire Richard Branson — has died at the age of 80.   In a heartfelt message shared on social media, Branson described his wife of almost 50 years as his “best friend, my rock, my guiding light, my world.”  

A quiet life behind a very public empire

Joan Templeman was by many accounts the steady, grounding presence behind Richard Branson’s extraordinary public and business life. Born in Glasgow, she came from modest beginnings and — long before Branson became a global name — worked in humble jobs, including in a London antique/bric-a-brac shop.  

It was in 1976, at a recording-studio associated with what would become the Virgin Group, that Richard Branson first met her. He later recalled that the connection was immediate.  

They had three children — Holly Branson, Sam Branson, and a daughter, Clare Sarah, who tragically died shortly after birth in 1979.  

Despite Richard Branson’s global fame and high-profile ventures — from airlines to space travel — Joan preferred privacy. In various public reflections, Branson credited her as the steady moral-compass and emotional anchor behind many of his life and business decisions.  

His tribute: love, grief — and memories

In announcing her death, Branson wrote:

“Heartbroken to share that Joan, my wife and partner for 50 years, has passed away.”

“She was the most wonderful mum and grandmum our kids and grandkids could ever have wished for.”  

He added that she was his “guiding light,” “rock,” and “world.”  

According to later reports, Joan died “quickly and painlessly” in hospital — with Branson by her side.   The suddenness of her passing shocked family and friends; just recently the couple marked her 80th birthday, and she had appeared in good spirits.  

In reflecting on their life together, Branson said that while life “will never be the same,” the family remains “far more grateful for the extraordinary gift of the life we shared.”  

What Joan’s legacy means — beyond the headlines

Even before her death, Joan’s role in the Branson story was symbolic of something many often overlook: how a grounding, private, supportive partner can shape — quietly but firmly — the life of a public figure.

• She helped anchor Richard Branson’s personal life as his ventures expanded globally.

• She fostered a family life away from spotlights, providing normality for their children despite global fame.

• Her humility — from working in a small antiques shop to being the backbone of a high-flying empire — resonates as a reminder that wealth and success don’t erase the value of modesty, humanity, and family.

In his tributes, Branson made clear that her influence went far beyond the role of “wife of a billionaire.” She was a partner, a mother, a grandmother, a confidante — and for him, the grounding force behind it all.

The passing of Joan Templeman is not just the end of a private life; for Richard Branson and their children, it marks the close of half a century of love, partnership, sacrifice, and shared memories.

Attached is a news article regarding Richard Branson wife passing away 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce3z1gp2574o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

How They Are Trying to Destroy Jamaica”: Rising Concerns Over External Pressures Threatening the Island’s Future

Jamaica, long celebrated for its culture, resilience, and global influence, is facing a growing wave of fear and frustration among citizens who believe that the island is being undermined by powerful external forces. While the phrase “they are trying to destroy Jamaica” has become increasingly common online and in neighbourhood conversations, the reality behind this sentiment is rooted in a complex mix of economic strain, foreign influence, crime, and political pressure that many Jamaicans feel is eroding the nation’s stability.

Economic Squeeze: When Investment Becomes Control

Foreign investment has played a major role in Jamaica’s development, but critics argue that some deals leave the country vulnerable. Concerns include:

• Large-scale land acquisitions by foreign companies that reduce local ownership.

• High-interest foreign loans that trap the country in cycles of debt.

• Tourism developments that generate profit while offering limited benefit to everyday Jamaicans.

Many feel Jamaica’s economy increasingly serves outside interests, leaving citizens with rising prices, stagnant wages, and shrinking opportunities.

Crime and External Influence

Violent crime has long plagued the island, but authorities and analysts note that:

• International gun trafficking

• Foreign criminal networks, and

• Drug routes involving overseas players

all contribute to Jamaica’s internal insecurity. Some Jamaicans believe external actors are deliberately fuelling instability to weaken the country socially and economically.

Political Pressure and Global Power Plays

Jamaica, like many small nations, sits within a geopolitical tug-of-war. International agreements, security partnerships, and trade expectations often leave the island with little room to shape its own path. There is growing criticism that:

• Strong global powers push policies that benefit them more than Jamaica.

• Aid and development promises sometimes come with hidden strings attached.

• Diplomatic pressure can influence domestic policy in ways that don’t reflect the will of the Jamaican people.

This sense of external manipulation—real or perceived—feeds the belief that Jamaica is being steered away from independence and national self-determination.

Cultural Erosion and Social Fracture

Jamaicans take pride in their culture, but many feel it is being slowly diluted or exploited:

• The global commodification of reggae and dancehall often sidelines local artists.

• Foreign media influence is reshaping youth culture.

• Traditional values are clashing with modern pressures, causing division.

For many, the attack on Jamaica is not just economic or political—it is cultural.

Who Is “They”

The phrase “they” varies depending on who you ask. Some point to foreign governments, others to multinational companies, global financial institutions, or external criminal networks. The perception is not about a single villain but about a system of external forces—economic, political, and cultural—that Jamaica struggles to defend itself against.

A Crossroads for the Nation

Despite these challenges, Jamaica continues to demonstrate its trademark resilience. Community movements, youth activism, and renewed pushes for economic sovereignty show that Jamaicans are far from defeated.

The belief that “they are trying to destroy Jamaica” highlights a deeper truth:

Jamaicans want more control over their future—over their land, their culture, their economy, and their national identity.

The world has underestimated Jamaica before, but history consistently shows one thing:

Jamaica refuses to be broken.

Attached is a news article regarding the position of the Jamaica government position to rebuild Jamaica 

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/hurricane-melissa-left-8-billion-in-damage-jamaica-needs-us-support-to-get-back-on-its-feet/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Reportedly Considering Sending U.S. Troops to Nigeria Amid Growing Regional Instability

Former U.S. President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing the possibility of deploying American troops to Nigeria, according to sources close to his advisory circle. The discussions come amid escalating violence in parts of northern Nigeria, where militant attacks and armed insurgencies have intensified in recent months.

While no formal policy announcement has been made, insiders suggest that Trump has been privately expressing concern over what he views as “unchecked chaos” in the region, raising questions about whether a more assertive American role could be on the table should he return to the White House.

Rising Violence Sparks International Attention

Nigeria has faced a surge in violent incidents involving extremist groups, criminal militias, and separatist factions. Towns across the northern states have suffered repeated raids, kidnappings, and clashes, prompting renewed international alarm. Humanitarian groups estimate that millions have been displaced, with security forces stretched thin.

Trump’s discussions centre on whether the U.S. should intervene directly to support Nigerian security forces, particularly in counter-insurgency operations. Some advisers reportedly argue that an American troop presence could stabilise key regions and strengthen ties with Abuja, while others warn it could draw the U.S. into a prolonged and complex conflict.

Concerns Over U.S. Foreign Policy Direction

Critics of the proposal note that deploying troops to Nigeria would mark a major shift in U.S. military engagement in Africa. During Trump’s presidency, he repeatedly signalled a desire to reduce American involvement overseas, especially in countries facing longstanding internal conflicts.

Foreign policy analysts say the mere possibility of a U.S. deployment has already sparked debate in Washington. Supporters argue that Nigeria—Africa’s most populous nation and largest economy—is too important to allow further destabilisation. Opponents counter that American soldiers should not be placed in harm’s way in a conflict with deep-rooted political, ethnic, and economic dimensions.

Nigerian Government Response

Officials in Abuja have not publicly commented on the reports, though past administrations have welcomed international support while resisting large-scale foreign troop presence on Nigerian soil.

Security analysts in Nigeria caution that foreign military involvement could inflame tensions if not carefully coordinated. However, others argue that additional international pressure and assistance may be necessary to curb the growing influence of insurgent groups.

What Comes Next

With Trump continuing to shape Republican foreign policy discourse, any suggestion of deploying U.S. troops—whether speculative or strategic—is likely to spark intense discussion. For now, the idea remains under consideration rather than a concrete plan, but its emergence highlights the growing international concern around Nigeria’s security crisis.

As violence continues to escalate, the question of external intervention—American or otherwise—may become a defining issue for West Africa’s stability in the months ahead.

Attached is a news article regarding trump considering sending troops to Nigeria to fight in the war 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/03/why-is-donald-trump-threatening-military-intervention-in-nigeria

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Ethiopia Volcano Eruption Sparks Fears as Communities Scramble to Evacuate

A sudden volcanic eruption in Ethiopia has sent shockwaves across the East African nation, forcing thousands of residents to flee their homes as lava, ash, and toxic fumes blanket parts of the surrounding region. The eruption, which began without significant warning, has raised urgent concerns for public safety, air quality, and the stability of nearby infrastructure.

Authorities confirmed that the eruption occurred in Ethiopia’s volcanically active Rift Valley region, an area known for frequent seismic movements but rarely for eruptions of this scale. Plumes of thick ash shot into the sky, grounding local flights and prompting airspace warnings across neighbouring countries. Images circulating on social media show rivers of molten lava cutting through dry terrain, igniting vegetation and destroying farmland.

Local officials say emergency response teams have been deployed to assist communities closest to the volcano, many of whom had only minutes to evacuate. Villages within a 20–30 kilometre radius have been placed on high alert as experts assess the trajectory of the lava flow. Temporary shelters have been established in schools and government buildings to accommodate displaced families.

Geologists from Ethiopia’s Ministry of Mines and the Pan-African Volcanic Observatory reported that the eruption appears to have been triggered by a rapid build-up of pressure beneath the Earth’s crust along the East African Rift. They warn that additional activity is possible in the coming days, with aftershocks and further ash emissions likely.

Infrastructure around the region has also been hit. Several major roads have been closed due to low visibility and advancing lava, while power lines have been damaged in at least two districts. Farmers fear devastating long-term impacts on crops and livestock, as the eruption arrives during a critical agricultural period.

Humanitarian organisations are urging swift international support, particularly for food, clean water, and medical supplies. Respiratory issues caused by ash exposure are already being reported, especially among children and the elderly.

Ethiopia’s government has appealed for calm, assuring citizens that scientific teams are closely monitoring the volcano’s behaviour. Prime Ministerial officials said that protecting lives remains the top priority and that recovery efforts will begin as soon as conditions stabilise.

As the eruption continues to unfold, residents and emergency workers alike are bracing for what may become one of the most significant natural disasters to strike Ethiopia in recent years. The full scale of the damage is yet to be known, but for many families living in the volcano’s shadow, the immediate focus is simply survival.

Attached is a news article regarding volcanic eruption in Ethiopia

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn41vl9d5qko.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Billionaire Robbed of £100,000 Richard Mille Watch in Daring Late-Night Heist

A billionaire businessman was left shaken after being robbed of his £100,000 Richard Mille watch during a brazen late-night attack that has stunned the luxury elite and raised new concerns about high-value crime in the UK’s major cities.

The victim, who has not been publicly named for security reasons, was reportedly targeted outside an exclusive West London restaurant shortly after 11pm on Tuesday. According to sources close to the investigation, the billionaire had just stepped into his chauffeured vehicle when two masked men on an electric motorbike pulled up alongside him.

Before the victim’s security team could react, one of the assailants allegedly smashed the car window with a hammer while the other demanded the watch at knifepoint. In a matter of seconds, they snatched the distinctive Richard Mille timepiece — believed to be worth around £100,000 — before speeding off into side streets and disappearing into the night.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed that officers were called to reports of a violent robbery and that an investigation is now underway. No arrests have yet been made.

The incident is the latest in a string of targeted luxury-watch robberies, with high-end brands such as Richard Mille increasingly sought after by organised criminal gangs. Known for their exotic materials, engineering excellence, and celebrity clientele, Richard Mille watches often retail for six-figure sums and can resell for even more on the black market.

A security expert familiar with similar cases says the robbery appears “professional and pre-planned.”

“This wasn’t opportunistic,” he explained. “These individuals knew exactly who their target was and exactly what he was wearing. Richard Mille watches are recognisable even from a distance and have become a symbol that attracts criminals.”

The billionaire, who is said to be cooperating fully with investigators, was unharmed but described as “deeply shaken” by the ordeal. His security team is also reviewing procedures after what appears to be a swift, highly coordinated attack that exploited a small window of vulnerability.

Police are examining CCTV footage from the surrounding area and appealing for witnesses who may have seen two men fleeing on an e-bike shortly after the incident.

The theft adds pressure on authorities to address the rising trend of high-value robberies involving designer watches, jewellery, and luxury vehicles — crimes increasingly carried out by agile, masked thieves using scooters or electric bikes to make rapid getaways.

As investigators continue the hunt for the stolen six-figure timepiece, the case highlights a growing reality: even the ultra-wealthy, surrounded by security and surveillance, are not immune to the organised crime networks targeting London’s most exclusive districts.

Attached is a news article regarding a billionaire robbed for his 100k Richard Millie watch 

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/battersea-robbery-luxury-watch-billionaire-london-theft-b1259617.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561