Thursday, 27 November 2025

Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Giorgia Meloni — what the record says about her father and alleged underworld links

Giorgia Meloni’s rise from a working-class Roman neighborhood to Italy’s premiership has long been accompanied by intense scrutiny of her personal history. Part of that scrutiny concerns her father, Francesco (often reported as “Franco”) Meloni, and media reporting about his criminal past and possible links to organised crime. Below I set out the verifiable record, what reputable reports have claimed, and what is—and importantly—is not supported by public evidence.

The verified facts

Conviction for drug trafficking in Spain (1995). Multiple contemporary reports and later profiles note that Francesco Meloni was arrested in the Balearics in the mid-1990s and sentenced in Spain for drug trafficking; some accounts say the sentence was around nine years. This is the core, documented fact at the centre of coverage.  

Large seizure reported. Several outlets reporting on the case at the time and later describe a major seizure of hashish (reports vary on the precise figure and wording used by different papers). Some local Spanish press and later English-language reports referenced large quantities connected to the arrest.  

Meloni’s public distancing and limited contact. Giorgia Meloni has repeatedly described being abandoned by her father as a child and having little or no contact with him for long periods. Biographical profiles used during her political rise quote her family background and note she was raised largely by her mother.  


Claims that go further — and the evidence (or lack of it)

Allegations of direct collusion with criminal organisations. Some media items and pieces citing statements from criminal informants or turncoats have suggested Francesco Meloni supplied drugs to criminal groups. For example, reporting that references mob informants’ claims has appeared in outlets such as The Times and some Italian investigative pieces. Those reports attribute the assertions to testimonies or sources inside organised-crime investigations rather than to court rulings directly tying Meloni senior to named mafia bosses. These are serious allegations but are based in the public record largely as sourced claims rather than as new judicial findings published against the prime minister or her immediate family in recent years.  

Economic links and business networks. Some investigative pieces and biographical write-ups have flagged alleged indirect economic connections involving a network of companies and property interests with names that intersect members of Meloni’s extended family. Such claims have been reported as lines of inquiry or disclosures based on documentation assembled by journalists; they have not been the subject, as of the most widely circulated reports, of criminal convictions of Giorgia Meloni herself. Where journalists suggest possible indirect links, they typically present them as matters for further scrutiny rather than settled legal findings.  

What the record does not show

There is no credible public record (court verdict or confirmed criminal charge) establishing that Giorgia Meloni herself has participated in drug trafficking or belonged to organised-crime groups. Allegations concerning her father’s past do not automatically or legally imply criminal responsibility on her part. Reputable outlets and legal commentators stress the distinction between a relative’s conviction and any unproven claim about a politician’s personal wrongdoing.  

Why the story matters — and why caution matters too

The parentage and background of political leaders are legitimately of public interest when they illuminate character, influence, or conflicts of interest. At the same time, responsible reporting must distinguish:

1. Documented judicial facts (arrests, convictions, sentences).

2. First-hand evidence tying people to criminal organisations (court rulings, wiretaps, prosecutorial findings).

3. Allegations and sourced claims from informants or third parties (which require careful corroboration).

4. Rumour or politically motivated smears (which deserve scepticism and verification).

In Meloni’s case, the documented fact that her father was arrested and convicted in Spain in the 1990s is well attested. Reports that place him within broader criminal networks rely on informants or journalistic reconstructions and should be treated as claims unless substantiated by court decisions or clear documentary evidence made public by competent authorities.  

Bottom line

Fact: Giorgia Meloni’s father was convicted for drug trafficking in Spain in the 1990s; that fact is reported by multiple outlets.  

Allegations beyond that fact: Some reports and informants have linked him to larger organised-crime networks; those claims appear in the press but rest on informant testimony and journalistic reconstruction rather than on newly published court rulings against Meloni or direct legal findings implicating her.  

No public evidence links Giorgia Meloni herself to criminal activity; responsible coverage should keep allegations about relatives separate from proven facts about the politician.

Attached is a news article regarding Georgia meloni father who was a drug dealer 

https://amp.majorcadailybulletin.com/news/local/2022/09/29/106323/mallorca-drugs-giorgia-meloni-father-was-jailed-for-trafficking.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Greta Thunberg and the Green Canal: A Protest at the Heart of Venice

On the weekend of 22–24 November 2025, Venice’s iconic waterways were transformed — at least temporarily — into a vivid symbol of environmental alert.   Among those involved was Greta Thunberg, who joined activists from Extinction Rebellion in pouring green dye into the celebrated Grand Canal.  

What Happened

The protest saw the waters of the Grand Canal dyed bright green using a fluorescent, “environmentally harmless” tracer dye — similar to substances used in environmental monitoring.  

The demonstration wasn’t confined to Venice: activists from Extinction Rebellion conducted parallel actions in other Italian cities, dyeing rivers, canals, fountains and lakes.  

In Venice, the group hung a large banner reading “Stop Ecocide” from the city’s historic Rialto Bridge, while many participants were dressed in red outfits and veiled faces — creating a dramatic, visually arresting scene.  

The protest was timed to coincide with the conclusion of the international COP30 UN climate conference in Brazil — a summit at which many climate activists felt global leaders failed to commit to sufficiently ambitious fossil-fuel reductions.  

Official Response & Consequences

Authorities moved quickly: Greta Thunberg and around 35 other activists were given a 48-hour ban from Venice and fined €150 (about £130–£132) each.  

The local administration, including regional governor Luca Zaia, condemned the act as a “disrespectful” gesture toward Venice’s fragile heritage and warned about possible environmental impacts.  

Environmental officials reportedly collected water samples after the dyeing to check for ecological damage. According to some sources, the green hue began dispersing naturally within hours thanks to tidal flow; yet critics argued that the stunt — regardless of its non-toxic dye — sets a troubling precedent for using public waterways as protest canvases.  


Motivation Behind the Protest

For Thunberg and fellow activists, the green-dye protest was meant as a bold — and visceral — metaphor: the unnatural colour of Venice’s normally serene waters was designed to jolt public attention to the “massive effects of climate collapse,” particularly on low-lying, vulnerable cities threatened by sea-level rise and environmental degradation.  

They explicitly linked the action to disappointment over the COP30 climate talks, criticizing government reluctance to include decisive fossil-fuel restrictions in global climate agreements.  

Supporters of the protest say such dramatic imagery is exactly what’s needed to break through public apathy. Some tourists and observers reportedly praised it as a “raw and real” depiction of ecological urgency.  

Debate & Criticism

But the action was far from universally applauded. Critics — including several Italian authorities — condemned it as disrespectful to Venice’s history and heritage, arguing that the city and its waterways should not be used as theatrical backdrops.  

Environmental sceptics questioned whether the “non-toxic” dye was truly harmless, raising concerns about potential impacts on aquatic life, light penetration, and water quality. Even if immediately biodegradable, such interventions may undermine long-term protections for sensitive ecosystems — especially in a lagoon as complex and fragile as Venice’s.

On the other hand, defenders argue that similar dyes are already used in hydrogeological studies worldwide — and that overreaction to colour may reflect political discomfort with disruptive protest more than real ecological danger.

What It Means for Climate Activism

This incident marks one of the most visible and controversial uses of physical spectacle in climate activism to date.

For activists: it shows how protest tactics are evolving beyond marches and speeches — turning historic, symbolic spaces into living canvases that force confrontation with environmental realities.

For authorities and heritage-conscious communities: it exposes the growing tension between the urgency of climate messaging and the imperative to preserve cultural and ecological integrity.

For the public: it raises uncomfortable questions — about where lines should be drawn between legitimate civil disobedience and potential environmental or cultural damage, and about whether shock-value activism achieves meaningful change or merely sparks headlines.

Whether one views the dye-stained waters as a cry for climate justice or a destructive stunt depends largely on one’s weighting of urgency versus preservation.

Attached is a news article regarding Greta Thunberg and the Green Canal: A Protest at the Heart of Venice

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/greta-thunberg-banned-venice-grand-canal-protest-b2871264.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Britain’s first AI police assistant goes live in trial — but it’s virtual, not robotic (London briefing)

The UK has taken a cautious step into policing with artificial intelligence: a new AI virtual assistant called “Bobbi” has been launched in a trial to answer non-emergency public queries for two forces, while separate trials of drones and robot dogs continue to test physical robotics for frontline support. The move underlines how forces are experimenting with automation to ease pressure on call handlers — but it also raises questions about scope, transparency and oversight.  

What’s happening

Thames Valley Police and the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary have rolled out Bobbi, an AI-driven virtual assistant designed to respond to frequently asked, non-emergency questions and point people towards the right services and information. Bobbi uses force-provided (closed-source) information — the same guidance call handlers consult — and is explicitly not intended for emergency use or to investigate crimes. The trial launched in late November 2025.  

Local spokespeople say the assistant is aimed at reducing demand for human call handlers and digital desks, so staff can focus on urgent incidents. Bobbi interacts in a conversational way and can signpost users to forms, advice pages or the right local team. The creators stress the system is a tool to assist the public and the service, not to replace policing work.  

Not a walking robot on the beat

Although headlines about “police robots” often conjure images of roaming, humanoid machines, Bobbi is a chatbot: a virtual, web-facing assistant. Separately, the UK has been trialling physical robotic technologies in limited roles — for example, robotic dogs for hazardous reconnaissance and drones as rapid responders feeding live intelligence to officers. Those trials are for specific operational tasks and are subject to separate testing, legal and ethical reviews. The virtual assistant trial should not be confused with fully autonomous street patrol robots.  

Safeguards, transparency and public trust

Critics and civil-liberties groups warn that any AI in policing must be transparent, auditable and used with clear human oversight. Key concerns include data protection, how training data is selected, whether biases could creep into automated advice, and ensuring routes for redress when the assistant gives incorrect guidance. Police forces involved say Bobbi relies only on force-provided information and that any escalation to a human is straightforward — but watchdogs are watching closely.  

What the forces say

In statements accompanying the launch, Chief Officers emphasised Bobbi’s role as an assistant to the public and staff, not a replacement for people answering calls. They noted the trial will be closely evaluated to measure accuracy, user satisfaction, demand reduction and any unintended consequences before any wider rollout is considered. 

Looking ahead

The trial is part of a wider UK pattern of experimenting with automation in policing: Met Police drone pilots in London, robot-dog tests by some forces, and virtual assistants elsewhere. Each technology brings different benefits and risks. Virtual assistants may offer immediate load-saving benefits with relatively low physical-safety risk, while drones and robot dogs raise greater operational, legal and ethical questions that require detailed frameworks before widespread deployment. Public engagement, transparency of evaluation results, and clear rules on accountability will be crucial if more AI and robotic tools are to be adopted.  

Bottom line: Bobbi marks the UK’s first public-facing AI police virtual assistant trial — a software step into AI-enabled policing rather than a robot on London’s streets. It’s an incremental experiment with potential benefits for stretched services, but it comes with the usual caveats about oversight, privacy and the need for transparent evaluation before any wider adoption.  

Attached is a news article regarding the new police AI robot being tested on the streets of London 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxw9xnk7rzo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Man Pleads Guilty After Driving Into Crowd of Liverpool Fans During Victory Parade

A man has pleaded guilty to a shocking incident in which he drove his car into a crowd of Liverpool fans celebrating the club’s latest trophy victory, leaving several people injured and sending panic through the packed streets.

The incident occurred during Liverpool’s official victory parade, where tens of thousands of supporters had gathered along the city’s main routes to watch the open-top bus carrying players and staff. Witnesses described the moment of impact as “chaos”, with fans jumping out of the way as the vehicle accelerated into the crowd.

According to prosecutors, the 32-year-old defendant drove through a cordoned-off area despite multiple warnings from police. CCTV footage showed the vehicle swerving before striking a group of supporters near Queen’s Drive, prompting officers to intervene within seconds.

Emergency services treated multiple people at the scene, with at least six fans taken to hospital. While none of the injuries were life-threatening, several victims sustained broken bones, deep cuts, and shock.

In a hearing at Liverpool Crown Court, the man admitted charges of dangerous driving, causing injury by aggravated vehicle use, and failing to stop at the scene. The court heard that the defendant had no prior history of violence but was described as “reckless and irresponsible”, with prosecutors adding that his actions “could easily have resulted in fatalities”.

Fans who witnessed the event expressed disbelief that such a moment of celebration could be marred by violence. “Everyone was just out enjoying themselves,” said one supporter. “Then suddenly people were screaming and running. It was terrifying.”

Liverpool FC issued a statement thanking emergency services for their rapid response and sending well-wishes to those injured. “A day of joy was disrupted by an unacceptable act,” the club said. “We are grateful that everyone is now recovering.”

The judge has ordered pre-sentence reports and remanded the defendant in custody ahead of sentencing next month. He is expected to face a lengthy driving ban and a potential prison term.

What was meant to be a proud moment for the city has become a sobering reminder of how quickly celebrations can turn to danger — and how vital swift action from authorities can be in preventing greater tragedy.

Attached is a news article regarding a man who pleads guilty to driving into a crowd of Liverpool fans at victory parade 

https://www.channel4.com/news/man-pleads-guilty-after-driving-into-crowd-at-liverpool-fc-parade

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Outrage as MPs Accused of Laughing Amid Fears for British Oil and Gas Jobs

A storm of public anger has erupted after several Members of Parliament were accused of laughing in the House of Commons during a tense debate on the future of Britain’s oil and gas sector. The incident, captured on parliamentary cameras, sparked fury among workers and unions who say the reaction showed “complete disrespect” for the thousands of people facing potential redundancy.

Workers Feel ‘Mocked’ as Industry Faces Uncertainty

The exchange occurred during discussions on new energy transition policies — measures which some fear could accelerate job losses across the North Sea basin and other key industrial hubs. As an opposition MP highlighted the human cost of job cuts, several MPs on the government benches appeared to laugh, drawing immediate criticism.

Oil and gas workers from Aberdeen to Teesside have described the moment as “heartbreaking” and “humiliating”, with many taking to social media to voice their frustration.

“We’re talking about families losing livelihoods, not a joke,” said one offshore engineer who has worked in the industry for over 20 years. “It shows how out of touch Westminster has become.”

Unions Condemn the Reaction

The Unite and GMB unions were quick to condemn what they called “mocking behaviour” in Parliament.

A spokesperson for GMB said:

“Whether intended or not, laughing during a debate about job losses sends the worst possible message to workers already living in uncertainty.”

Unions are urging MPs to focus on delivering a clear energy transition plan that protects jobs while moving the country toward cleaner energy sources.

MPs Deny Wrongdoing

Several of the MPs involved have since denied that the laughter was connected to the discussion about oil and gas workers, insisting it was unrelated parliamentary chatter. However, critics argue that the optics alone were “damaging enough”.

Political commentators say the episode highlights the widening gap between Westminster and communities dependent on heavy industry.

Communities Already Under Pressure

The British oil and gas sector has been under mounting strain due to global energy shifts, reduced investment, stricter environmental regulations, and uncertainty surrounding future drilling licences. Analysts warn that without a structured transition plan:

Tens of thousands of jobs could be at risk

Local economies in Scotland and northern England could be destabilised

The UK could lose vital technical expertise in offshore engineering

For many workers, the alleged laughter was a symbol of how their industries are being left behind.

Calls for Accountability and Respect

Opposition parties and industry leaders are calling for MPs to show greater respect for workers facing redundancy and to prioritise measures that support retraining, job protection, and investment in emerging energy sectors.

“People deserve dignity, not derision,” said one senior energy analyst. “Real lives are on the line.”

A Moment That Won’t Be Forgotten

Whether the laughter was intentional or not, the moment has struck a nerve in communities already grappling with economic insecurity. For many, it has become yet another reminder of the growing frustration with political leaders who seem disconnected from the realities facing Britain’s industrial workforce.

Attached is a news article regarding MPs laughing at British oil and gas workers losing there jobs 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/ministers-told-apologise-oil-gas-084338537.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Man Enslaved Workers at Local Car Wash in Shocking Modern-Day Slavery Case

A man has been convicted after a disturbing investigation uncovered that he had been enslaving vulnerable people and forcing them to work at his car wash in what police have described as “one of the most shocking cases of modern-day exploitation in recent years.”

The unnamed 47-year-old defendant was found guilty at Crown Court this week of multiple offences, including holding individuals in servitude, forced labour, human trafficking, and assault. The victims — some as young as 19 — were discovered living in cramped, filthy conditions in a makeshift room behind the car wash’s main office.

Victims Forced to Work Seven Days a Week

According to prosecutors, the man targeted individuals who were homeless, struggling with addiction, or new to the country with limited English. He lured them in with promises of legitimate work and safe accommodation. Instead, victims testified that they were forced to work seven days a week, often more than 12 hours per day, with little or no pay.

Several victims told investigators they were threatened, intimidated, and beaten if they asked for wages or attempted to leave. One victim described feeling “trapped like an animal” and said they believed they would be killed if they tried to escape.

Car Wash Customers Unaware of Abuse

Police revealed that the car wash, located on a busy roadside in an industrial estate, had been operating under the radar for years. Thousands of customers had passed through, unaware that the workers scrubbing their cars were being held against their will.

A spokesperson for the local council confirmed that concerns had been raised previously about the car wash operating without proper licences, but no one had suspected criminal activity of this scale.

Rescue Operation Exposed the Horrors

The operation to rescue the victims began after a member of the public contacted authorities, reporting that workers “looked terrified” and appeared to be living on-site. A multi-agency task force — including police, social services, and the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority — executed a raid earlier this year.

Inside, officers found:

Mattresses in a storage cupboard with no windows

Buckets used as makeshift toilets

Workers with untreated injuries

Confiscated passports and ID documents

CCTV cameras positioned to monitor workers’ movements constantly

Detectives said the level of control exerted over the victims was “absolute.”

Judge Condemns ‘Cruel and Calculated Exploitation’

Sentencing will take place next month, but the judge has already condemned the man’s actions as “cruel, calculated, and motivated purely by greed.” The court heard that the car wash generated thousands of pounds per week, none of which went to the workers.

The victims are now receiving support, housing, and access to rehabilitation services.

Modern Slavery Still Rising

Police say the case highlights the continued rise of modern slavery across the UK, particularly within industries such as car washes, nail bars, construction, and agriculture.

A detective involved in the case urged the public to stay alert:

“Modern slavery is hidden in plain sight. If something feels wrong — report it. You may be saving someone’s life.”

Authorities are now reviewing other businesses linked to the convicted man and have not ruled out further arrests.

Attached is a news article regarding a man who inslaved people at a car wash 

https://news.sky.com/story/man-jailed-for-keeping-eight-people-enslaved-in-london-car-wash-13476151

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Saddam Hussein ‘Requested to Watch The Passion of the Christ Before His Execution’ – A Remarkable Claim Re-Emerges

A striking and controversial claim has resurfaced in recent discussions about the final days of Saddam Hussein — that the former Iraqi dictator allegedly requested to watch Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ shortly before his execution in December 2006.

While the Iraqi government at the time released only minimal details about Hussein’s final hours, several U.S. military personnel involved in guarding him have previously spoken publicly about his behaviour on death row. Among the more unusual claims is that Saddam developed a fascination with films during his captivity, including Mel Gibson’s 2004 biblical epic depicting the final hours of Jesus Christ.

A Quiet and Curious Final Request

According to these accounts, Saddam Hussein — once one of the most feared and authoritarian leaders in the Middle East — was said to have asked his American guards if he could watch The Passion of the Christ, a film known for its intense depictions of suffering, sacrifice, and redemption.

Those who made the claim noted that Saddam appeared intrigued by the film’s religious themes and its portrayal of loyalty, betrayal, and destiny. Although there is no official confirmation from Iraqi authorities, the story has persisted due to its unusual nature and the insights it may offer into Saddam’s mental state in the days before his death.

Life on Death Row

During his imprisonment, several U.S. soldiers described the former president as surprisingly calm, talkative, and even reflective. He reportedly spent long stretches reading, writing, and discussing politics, history, and religion with his guards.

The claim about The Passion of the Christ has often been linked to broader descriptions of Saddam’s behaviour:

He was said to enjoy philosophical conversations.

He frequently discussed faith and morality.

He was known to ask for books and films to occupy his time.

Nevertheless, the exact details of what he watched or requested remain largely unverified, as the Iraqi government tightly controlled information around his trial, imprisonment, and execution.

Symbolism and Speculation

Why The Passion of the Christ?

Some analysts argue that Saddam, who styled himself as a strongman and martyr-like defender of Iraq, may have been drawn to the film’s themes of persecution. Others believe it was simply part of his curiosity about Western culture during captivity.

Religious scholars have also suggested that even though Saddam was not regarded as deeply devout during his rule, the psychological weight of impending death often pushes individuals toward spiritual reflection, making the choice of film plausible.

Historical Ambiguity Remains

While the story continues to circulate — often revived in interviews, memoirs, and online discussions — there has never been a formal confirmation. It remains one of many curious anecdotes surrounding Saddam Hussein’s fall from power and his final hours.

Whether true or not, the idea of one of the 20th century’s most notorious leaders requesting to watch a film about suffering and redemption adds another layer of complexity to a figure whose life and death continue to fascinate the world.

Attached is a news article regarding saddam Hussein watching passion of Christ before his execution film 

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335345/trivia/?item=tr5642458

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trinidad and Tobago Caught in the Crossfire of Trump’s Escalating Drug War Against Venezuela

Trinidad and Tobago—long regarded as one of the Caribbean’s most stable democracies—now finds itself increasingly entangled in a geopolitical storm brewing between the United States and Venezuela. As former U.S. President Donald Trump intensifies his renewed “drug war” strategy against Nicolás Maduro’s government, regional analysts warn that the small twin-island nation is emerging as an unintended victim of rising tensions, shifting trafficking routes, and aggressive foreign policy.

A Strategic Location Becomes a Strategic Liability

Trinidad sits just seven miles off the Venezuelan coastline, a proximity that has always shaped its security and economic landscape. Traditionally, the two nations have enjoyed strong cultural and commercial ties, with migration and trade flowing back and forth for decades.

But Trump’s revived hardline approach toward Venezuela—framed as a crackdown on narcotics trafficking and “criminal networks aligned with the Maduro regime”—has pushed cartels, smugglers, and desperate migrants to redirect their activities into the nearest accessible territory: Trinidad.

Security officials report increasing concerns that the islands are being used as a transit point as traffickers attempt to evade U.S.-backed surveillance in Venezuelan waters. Fishing boatssmall skiffs, and covert night crossings have surged in recent months, placing enormous pressure on Trinidad’s coast guard and law enforcement agencies.


Rising Crime and Pressure on Local Communities

Local authorities warn that the spillover effects are already visible. Communities along the southwestern peninsula—such as CedrosIcacos, and Point Fortin—have seen a spike in illegal entries, refugee arrivals, and maritime interceptions.

Some residents report hearing boat engines late into the night, while others say they fear an uptick in gang-linked activity connected to smuggling operations. Police intelligence units caution that the presence of foreign criminal networks could escalate turf conflicts and increase the flow of illegal firearms into the local market.

The government of Trinidad and Tobago has insisted that it is committed to maintaining border integrity, but officials privately admit that the sheer scale of regional instability makes the challenge increasingly difficult.

Diplomatic Strain and U.S. Pressure

Washington’s renewed focus on Venezuela has indirectly placed Trinidad under diplomatic scrutiny. Trump advisers have reportedly pushed Caribbean nations to adopt harsher stances against Maduro, leading to concerns that Trinidad’s traditionally neutral position will be interpreted as non-cooperation.

Energy analysts note that the U.S. has frowned upon Trinidad’s past LNG and fuel agreements involving Venezuelan gas fields. With Trump once again vocal about “squeezing the regime,” there is worry within Port of Spain that the islands could face economic pressure or be lumped into broader regional enforcement sweeps.

Humanitarian Fallout: Venezuelan Migrants Caught in the Middle

As the Venezuelan crisis deepens, thousands of families fleeing poverty and political turmoil continue to risk the dangerous crossing to Trinidad. Trump’s renewed anti-Maduro campaign threatens to push even more civilians into unstable maritime journeys, with Trinidad bearing the consequences.

Local NGOs report shelters at capacity, limited resources for asylum seekers, and rising tensions between migrants and local residents who feel overwhelmed by the sudden demographic pressures.

Calls for a Regional Strategy

Trinidad’s leaders are urging the international community to recognize that punitive actions against Venezuela often create ripple effects across the smaller, more vulnerable Caribbean states. They stress the need for coordinated maritime securityhumanitarian assistance programmes, and diplomatic balance—rather than forcing Trinidad into the front line of a geopolitical clash it did not create.

Regional security experts agree that unless a broader Caribbean strategy is developed, Trinidad risks becoming the “buffer zone” between U.S. aggression and Venezuelan instability—a position that could jeopardize its safety, economy, and long-term social cohesion.

A Nation Caught Between Two Giants

With Trump’s agenda accelerating and Venezuela’s crisis deepening, Trinidad and Tobago stands at a dangerous crossroads. Its geography, once a blessing for trade and cultural exchange, has quickly become a fault line in an escalating drug war.

For many in Port of Spain, the hope now is that diplomacy—not force—prevails. Because as two powerful nations continue their confrontation, it is the small islands in between that risk paying the highest price.

Attached is a news article regarding Trinidad becoming a victim of trumps drug war against Venezuela 

https://youtu.be/zJkcaiJV0z4

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Deadly High-Rise Fire Rocks Hong Kong: What Happened at Wang Fuk Court

What Happened — The Blaze

On the afternoon of 26 November 2025, a ferocious fire broke out at Wang Fuk Court, a residential estate in the northern Hong Kong district of Tai Po. The complex comprises eight high-rise towers built in the 1980s, together housing nearly 2,000 flats — accommodating around 4,600 to 5,000 residents.  

The blaze reportedly began around 2:51 pm, on external scaffolding and green mesh wrapping one block under renovation. Within hours, flames spread rapidly — fueled by bamboo scaffolding, construction netting, and possibly flammable insulative materials — engulfing up to seven of the eight towers. Black smoke and roaring flames filled the sky, visible for miles.  

Fire crews upgraded the alarm to the highest severity (Level 5) as heat and toxic smoke made rescue efforts increasingly difficult. By early the following morning, four of the blocks were declared under control, but several buildings were still burning or too dangerous to enter.  


Human Cost — Death, Destruction, Displacement

The blaze has become the deadliest residential fire in Hong Kong in decades. As of the latest official reports:

At least 44 people have been confirmed dead — including one firefighter.  

Around 45 people remain in critical condition in hospital, with many more injured.  

Approximately 279 residents are still unaccounted for, presumed missing.  

Nearly 900 people have been evacuated to temporary shelters, many having lost their homes and personal belongings.  

Residents described hearing a loud bang prior to the fire’s ignition. As flames spread, many rushed from door to door, banging on neighbours’ doors to alert them — there had reportedly been no functioning fire alarm. One survivor recalled the fire spreading “so quickly,” and that attempts to fight it were insufficient given the scale.  

What Went Wrong — Renovations, Scaffolding, and Negligence. 

Although investigations are ongoing, authorities have highlighted several factors that may have contributed to the tragedy:

The buildings were under renovation, surrounded by bamboo scaffolding and green mesh — materials that readily fuelled the spread of fire.  

In the building not yet affected, police found windows sealed with foam insulation material, and plastic nets and film applied throughout — all of which may not meet fire-resistance standards.  

Three men — two company directors and an engineering consultant from the renovation firm — have been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter and gross negligence. Police allege their decisions led to the uncontrollable spread of fire and massive casualties.  

Fire authorities, residents and safety experts have likened the disaster to the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire in London, underlining how dangerous combustible renovation materials can be in high-density housing.  

Aftermath: Rescue, Investigation, and Public Backlash

The tragedy has triggered a massive rescue and relief operation. More than 700 firefighters, 128 fire engines and dozens of ambulances were deployed amid difficult conditions — intense heat, thick smoke and falling debris hampered efforts.  

Authorities set up temporary shelters for displaced residents, while neighbours, volunteers and community groups scrambled to provide food, aid and emotional support. The fire also drew sharp criticism from survivors and wider public, condemning what many see as cost-cutting and neglect of safety regulations. 

From the political side, the disaster arrives just before a major election cycle — raising fresh questions over building regulation, affordable housing safety, and the state’s oversight of renovation work. 

Broader Significance — Safety, Inequality, and Regretful Lessons

The sheer scale of human tragedy at Wang Fuk Court reflects deeper structural pressures in Hong Kong:

Housing density and affordability crisis — High-rise estates like Wang Fuk Court are part of the city’s subsidised housing system, meant to offer affordable homes. Yet aging buildings often require renovation — which, as this fire shows, can be a perilous necessity if done under lax safety standards.

Regulation and oversight failures — The blaze highlights how renovation practices (scaffolding choice, insulation materials, fire safety compliance) can become critical, life-or-death issues when applied to large high-rise estates.

Social inequalities and vulnerability — Many residents were long-term tenants, low- or middle-income households who may have had limited choice — underlining how tragedy disproportionately affects the most vulnerable.

Urgent need for change — The disaster may catalyse stricter building-safety reforms, better oversight of renovation firms, and renewed investment in fire prevention and affordable, safe housing.

What Happens Next?

Investigations into the cause and accountability are already underway. The arrests of the three individuals linked to the renovation company hint at potential legal consequences. Meanwhile, rescue and support operations continue — with thousands displaced, survivors grieving, and community solidarity forming.

Attached is a news article regarding burning flats in Hong Kong at least 55 dead 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c2emg1kj1klt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36
















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Two National Guard members shot near the White House — what we know so far

In a shocking incident on November 26, 2025, two members of the West Virginia National Guard were shot just blocks from the White House in Washington, D.C. The event has ignited national concern — both over the safety of deployed troops on U.S. streets, and over immigration and security policy.  

What happened

The shooting occurred around 2:15 p.m. ET near 17th and I Street NW, close to the Farragut West station — just two blocks from the White House.  

According to law enforcement, the suspect — believed to be acting alone — “rounded a corner” and opened fire, ambushing the Guard members who were on a “high-visibility patrol.”  

Both soldiers were critically wounded. A third person — the suspected shooter — was also shot during the response and is now in custody.  

Witnesses described chaotic scenes: people fleeing the area, police tape, helicopters landing, and emergency crews treating victims on sidewalks and in ambulances.  

Who is the suspect — and how authorities are reacting

The suspect has been identified as a 29-year-old Afghan nationalRahmanullah Lakanwal, who entered the United States in 2021 under a refugee-resettlement pathway.  

Lakanwal was granted asylum in April 2025.  

Authorities are treating the shooting as an apparent “targeted attack.” Federal agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Secret Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) responded to the scene and launched an investigation. 

As of now, no confirmed motive has been publicly released. Officials say more investigation is needed.  

Immediate consequences — security and political fallout

The shooting triggered an immediate lockdown of the White House complex, with nearby buildings locked down, restricted pedestrian movement, and heightened security for hours.  

In reaction — and at the request of the Donald J. Trump administration — the United States Department of Defense ordered the deployment of an additional 500 National Guard troops to Washington, D.C.  

The shooting has reignited debates over the presence of National Guard troops in civilian policing roles, and the broader policies around immigration, asylum, and security. Critics warn against painting all immigrants with the same brush, while others argue for tighter vetting and security measures.  

Why this matters — bigger picture

This shooting strikes at the heart of growing tensions in the United States around military involvement in domestic security, immigration policy, and public safety. The presence of National Guard troops in the capital — originally deployed under an emergency order by Trump — has already sparked legal challenges and public debate.  

The suspect’s background — as an Afghan national admitted under a resettlement program — will likely fuel political arguments on vetting and asylum policy. In turn, the government’s response may lead to tougher immigration enforcement, while civil-liberties advocates warn against stigmatization and broad reprisals.

Finally, for the security establishment, the attack raises urgent questions about how to protect uniformed troops and civilians alike, especially in high-visibility roles near sensitive sites such as the White House.

Attached is a news article regarding two national guards members shot near the White House 

https://news.sky.com/story/two-national-guard-members-shot-near-white-house-13474925

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Holiday Dreams Turned Nightmare: The £2.6 Million Fake Travel Agent Scam In one of the most ...