Friday, 28 November 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

U.S. Treasury Reports Tariff Revenue Nearing $215 Billion Amid Ongoing Trade Shifts

The U.S. Treasury has reported that total tariff revenue collected in recent years has climbed to approximately $215 billion, marking one of the highest cumulative tallies in modern American trade history. The surge reflects continued reliance on import duties as both a political tool and a source of federal income, particularly during periods of intensified economic competition with China and other major trading partners.

A Sharp Rise Driven by Trade Policy

Tariff revenue has risen sharply since the late 2010s, when the U.S. government began imposing sweeping duties on steel, aluminium, and a wide range of Chinese imports. These measures, initially introduced as part of broader trade negotiations, have remained largely intact through successive administrations.

Economists note that the increase is not solely due to higher tariff rates but also the persistence of targeted trade barriers that affect billions of dollars’ worth of goods. Despite expectations that some duties might be reduced, political appetite for maintaining tariffs has remained strong, fuelled by concerns over manufacturing jobs, national security, and economic self-sufficiency.

Revenue That Comes at a Cost

While the $215 billion figure represents a major boost to Treasury income, experts caution that tariffs are effectively a tax on U.S. companies and consumers. Importers typically pass higher costs down the supply chain, contributing to inflationary pressures and raising prices on products ranging from electronics and furniture to automobiles and construction materials.

Multiple industries—particularly retail, manufacturing, and agriculture—have urged Washington to revisit existing tariff structures, arguing that the financial burden hampers competitiveness and strains small businesses.

A Strategic Tool in Global Rivalries

Supporters of the current tariff landscape argue that strong trade measures remain necessary to counter what they describe as unfair practices, especially from China. Tariffs have been framed as a means to protect American intellectual property, limit market dumping, and support domestic producers facing subsidized foreign competitors.

In addition, tariffs have become an increasingly strategic lever in geopolitical negotiations, giving the U.S. leverage in discussions over technology, supply chains, and global security.

Future of U.S. Tariff Policy Remains Uncertain

Whether tariff revenue will continue climbing depends largely on upcoming political decisions. With debates intensifying over China policy, manufacturing reinvestment, and inflation, both major political parties are signalling interest in revising trade strategies—though not necessarily in reducing import duties.

If existing tariffs remain in place or expand further, Treasury revenue could rise beyond the current $215 billion benchmark, but so too could the economic challenges faced by consumers and key sectors of the U.S. economy.

A Balancing Act for Policymakers

The U.S. government now faces the difficult task of balancing national strategic interests with the economic realities of higher import costs. As global trade undergoes rapid transformation, the role tariffs play in the American economy—and the impact of the revenue they generate—will continue to be a critical topic shaping both financial policy and foreign relations.

Attached is a news article regarding US tariff revenue around $215 billion 

https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/tariff-revenue-reaches-215-billion-trump-eyes-dividend-program-americans-president-checks-prices-budget-scott-bessent-supreme-court

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Americans Turn to Bitcoin Mining to Heat Their Homes This Winter

As temperatures begin to plunge across the United States, a surprising trend is emerging: some Americans are choosing to heat their homes using Bitcoin mining. What began as a niche experiment among tech-savvy enthusiasts has rapidly grown into a cost-cutting alternative for households grappling with rising energy bills.

A Warm Solution Hidden in the Blockchain

Bitcoin mining—once known primarily for its energy consumption—produces a tremendous amount of heat as computers solve complex mathematical problems. Instead of letting that heat dissipate, a growing number of Americans are capturing it and using it to warm living spaces.

Specialised “miner-heaters” are now being marketed directly to consumers. These devices combine crypto-mining hardware with home-heating systems, effectively turning the heat by-product into a purposeful utility. Some users say the approach is already paying off: they get heat for their home and a trickle of Bitcoin in return.

Rising Energy Prices Drive Innovation

Utility costs have surged across many states, and winter heating bills are projected to be among the highest in recent years. Families looking to save money are experimenting with alternatives—from pellet stoves and solar installations to, now, crypto-powered warmth.

For some households, the economics are surprisingly favourable. While traditional mining rigs have a reputation for being energy-hungry, newer machines are far more efficient. When the heat they generate is used purposefully, the net cost of operation can be lower than running a standard electric heater—especially when factoring in the potential earnings from mining.

Tech Entrepreneurs Seize the Moment

Start-ups and established crypto firms alike have spotted the opportunity. Several companies are releasing compact units designed to be as quiet as conventional heaters and safe for indoor use. These hybrid heaters are marketed as “smart radiators” that also generate digital assets.

Some homeowners have even incorporated larger mining setups into basements and utility rooms, using ducting systems to push warm air throughout the house.

Environmental Debate Continues

The rise of Bitcoin-powered heating hasn’t escaped criticism. Environmental groups argue that encouraging mining—even for home heating—still increases electricity usage and carbon emissions in regions reliant on fossil fuels. Supporters counter that using heat that would otherwise be wasted makes mining more energy-efficient, especially in cold climates.

Some communities are even discussing whether crypto-heating could be integrated into district heating networks in the future, turning Bitcoin mining into a by-product heat source for entire neighbourhoods.

A Trend That Could Outlast Winter

Whether this remains a one-season curiosity or becomes a long-term phenomenon depends on several factors: energy prices, Bitcoin’s market value, and technological progress in mining hardware.

But for now, with winter settling in, Americans from the Midwest to New England are plugging in their mining rigs—not just to earn crypto, but to keep warm.

Attached is a news article regarding Americans using bitcoin to heat there homes this winter 

https://www.bitget.com/amp/news/detail/12560605072530

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Man Who Murdered Friend Over Box of Cornflakes Sentenced to 23 Years in Prison

A man who fatally attacked his friend during a shocking argument over a box of Corn Flakes has been jailed for 23 years, in a case that has stunned the community and highlighted the devastating consequences of impulsive violence.

The Incident

The confrontation unfolded earlier this year at a shared property where both men were staying. According to court evidence, the dispute began as a trivial argument over a cereal box, but rapidly escalated into a violent altercation. Witnesses described raised voices, pushing, and then a sudden, brutal attack in which the victim suffered fatal injuries.

Despite attempts by neighbours and paramedics to save him, the 42-year-old victim was pronounced dead at the scene.

Court Proceedings

During the trial, the prosecution argued that the attacker, a 37-year-old man, acted with extreme aggression and intent once the argument turned physical. CCTV footage and forensic evidence presented in court confirmed that the defendant continued to assault the victim even after he was incapacitated.

The defence attempted to argue that the attacker “lost control” in the heat of the moment, citing stress, alcohol, and a history of unresolved mental health issues. However, the judge ruled that the level of violence used could not be excused, describing the assault as “savage, disproportionate, and wholly avoidable.”

Sentenced to 23 Years

In sentencing, the judge emphasised the senseless nature of the killing, stating:

“A man has lost his life over a trivial disagreement. Nothing can justify the level of violence you inflicted. Your actions have destroyed a family, shocked the community, and taken a life over something utterly meaningless.”

The attacker was handed a 23-year prison sentence, with the possibility of parole only after serving two-thirds of the term.

Family Reaction

The victim’s family expressed relief at the sentence but said no punishment could ever repair the emotional devastation caused. In a statement released after the hearing, they said:

“We are heartbroken. He was a loving son, brother, and friend. To lose him in such a senseless and violent way is something we will never fully recover from.”

Community Shock

Neighbours described the incident as “unbelievable” and “beyond comprehension,” saying both men were known locally but had never appeared dangerous or confrontational.

One resident told reporters, “To think someone could be killed over a box of cereal… it’s horrifying. It makes you realise how quickly things can spiral.”

A Stark Reminder

The case stands as a grim reminder of how minor disagreements, when fuelled by anger or intoxication, can erupt into irreversible tragedy. Authorities have urged the public to seek help managing conflict and stress, emphasising that a single moment of rage can destroy lives forever.

Attached is a news article regarding a man jailed over killing a pensioner over a box of corn flakes 

https://www.wimbledonguardian.co.uk/comments/25657745/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

German “cartilage gel” — what’s real, what’s hype

A viral wave of social posts this year has claimed that German scientists have invented an injectable gel that regrows joint cartilage — no surgery, no long rehab, no knee or hip replacements ever again. The story sounds like a medical miracle. The reality is more complicated: important progress has been made in hydrogel and biomaterial research for cartilage repair, and Germany already has collagen-based products used in orthopaedics, but there is not a simple, widely-available, single-injection gel today that reliably regenerates human joint cartilage and replaces joint replacement surgery.  

What the viral posts got right

Researchers across the world — including teams with links to Germany — have made strong advances using hydrogels (water-rich polymer networks) that can act as scaffolds, deliver drugs or cells, reduce inflammation, and encourage cartilage growth in laboratory and animal models. Several recent papers and reviews describe injectable, self-healing, adhesive or drug-releasing hydrogels that promote chondrocyte (cartilage cell) activity or stem-cell differentiation and show promising repair in animals. These approaches are a leading direction for future cartilage therapies.  

What already exists clinically in Germany

There is a legitimately marketed German product — ChondroFiller® (and similar collagen-based scaffolds) — that has been used since the 2010s for focal cartilage defects and is delivered arthroscopically (through a minimally invasive surgery), not by a one-minute outpatient injection. These products act as scaffolds to fill small cartilage defects and support tissue repair, but they are not a cure for widespread osteoarthritis and still require surgical implantation and rehabilitation. Viral claims that ChondroFiller (or other “German gels”) regrow complete joint cartilage with a single injection are misleading.  

The most important recent science

A small number of high-profile preclinical studies (animal models) have shown near-complete cartilage repair using advanced hydrogels that combine mechanical strength, bioactive molecules (for example, growth factors or small molecules like kartogenin), and sometimes cell or exosome delivery. Those studies demonstrate the potential to generate hyaline-like cartilage (the durable type you need in a joint), but they were mostly in rodents or other animals — not in humans — and often required surgical placement rather than a simple in-office injection. Translating such results to routine human treatment requires human clinical trials that prove safety, consistent effectiveness, and durability.  

Where the science stands on human treatments

Focal-repair options: For limited, well-defined cartilage defects, surgeons already use scaffold implants, microfracture techniques, or autologous chondrocyte implantation with hydrogels — these are surgical or arthroscopic procedures and have established follow-up and rehab protocols.  

Injectable miracle? Not yet. The bold social claims — full regeneration of joint surfaces in weeks from a single injection available across Europe — are not supported by clinical evidence. Fact-checks and medical writers have warned that the headlines overstate the current capability of gels and hydrogels.  

Why it’s harder than it sounds

Cartilage is avascular (it has no blood vessels), bears heavy mechanical loads, and must form a specific extracellular matrix (collagens, proteoglycans, lubricin) to function. A successful therapy must:

1. Provide the right mechanical support while new tissue forms.

2. Deliver biochemical cues that push cells to form hyaline (not scar-like) cartilage.

3. Integrate seamlessly with the surrounding cartilage and underlying bone.

4. Work under the mechanical stresses of daily life for many years.

Meeting all four in humans — repeatedly and safely — is challenging, which is why careful clinical trials are essential.  

What patients should know

If you read a viral post promising a 60-day, no-surgery cure, treat it skeptically. Independent fact-checks have debunked the most extreme claims.  

If you have cartilage damage or osteoarthritis, talk to an orthopaedic specialist about current, evidence-based options: physiotherapy, weight management, pain control, injections (e.g., corticosteroids, viscosupplementation) for symptom relief, and surgical options when appropriate. New hydrogel-based or cell-based therapies may become options in the future as trials conclude.  

The outlook

The science is moving fast. Over the next several years we can expect more clinical trials testing advanced hydrogels, drug-loaded gels, and cell/exosome-enhanced materials. Some approaches could reach regulated approval for specific uses (small defects, adjuncts to surgery) before becoming broadly available as non-surgical injections for whole-joint osteoarthritis. For now, the “German gel” headline is largely clickbait: there is legitimate German work and commercial products in this space, but no one single injectable gel has yet delivered the sweeping, surgery-free cure that viral posts promise.  

Attached is a news article regarding Germany that have developed a gel that can re grows cartilage 

https://today.uconn.edu/2025/06/nguyens-injectable-piezoelectric-gel-could-treat-osteoarthritis-without-surgery/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband

Woman Horrifically Burned on Train by Man With 72 Prior Arrests: Public Outrage Over Repeated Failures in the System

A quiet weekday commute turned into a scene of terror after a woman was violently attacked and burned on a train by a man who, shockingly, had been arrested 72 times prior to the incident. The attack has ignited national outrage, with serious questions now being raised about how a repeat offender with such an extensive criminal history was allowed to remain free.

A Routine Journey Turns Into Horror

The victim, a woman in her 30s, was travelling on a late-afternoon service when the suspect boarded the train acting erratically. Witnesses say he began pacing the carriage before suddenly approaching the woman and dousing her with a flammable liquid.

Within seconds, he set her alight.

Passengers rushed to help, using coats and water bottles in desperate attempts to extinguish the flames. Emergency services were called immediately, and the woman was airlifted to a specialist burns unit where she remains in critical condition with life-altering injuries.

Several commuters were treated for shock, with one describing the scene as “something you’d expect in a warzone, not a British train.”

Suspect Had 72 Arrests — Yet Was Free

Police later confirmed that the attacker, a 42-year-old man, had been arrested 72 times over the past two decades for a catalogue of offences including violence, arson, drug abuse, antisocial behaviour, and multiple breaches of bail conditions.

Attached is a news article regarding a women who was burned on a train in an horrific attack 

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/chicago/news/blue-line-fire-attack-woman-burned-family-speaks/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36







Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The astonishing lean empire: Telegram at a glance

Few tech stories are as striking today as Telegram — a global messaging platform valued at around US$ 30 billion yet allegedly operated by roughly 30 employees working remotely.   What makes this feat more remarkable: Telegram reportedly has no physical officesno HR department, and a minimalist organizational structure.  

This lean structure contrasts sharply with what we typically expect of internet giants. Instead of sprawling offices, thousands of employees, and multiple hierarchical levels, Telegram runs quietly, efficiently — and globally.

The secret sauce: how Telegram pulls it off

• Remote-first and office-free

Telegram never built a traditional headquarters. Its staff work from various places across the world — a fully remote workforce that lets it avoid the fixed costs and overheads associated with large offices.  


• No HR, no bureaucracy

Rather than maintaining a traditional human-resources department, Telegram reportedly does not have “HR” at all. The company does not follow standard recruitment procedures; it often scouts talent via coding contests and direct selection, skipping formal interview pipelines. 

By trimming bureaucracy — no long approval chains, no middle management, no elaborate HR systems — Telegram claims to operate more like a “lean startup with global scale.”  

• Automation and engineering-driven operations

Telegram leverages automation heavily: many back-end tasks like server maintenance, moderation, and support rely on bots and automated infrastructure rather than large human teams.  

The core idea: keep human intervention minimal, let highly skilled engineers build robust systems that scale — rather than throwing workforce at scale.

• Flat hierarchy & direct leadership

The founder — Pavel Durov — reportedly acts as the sole product manager, making key decisions personally.   This “one-vision, one-leader” model cuts decision delays and ensures a coherent direction, rather than diluting responsibility across many layers.

Why this model works (for now) — and where it might falter

 What works

Cost efficiency & agility: Without offices, HR teams, or bureaucratic overhead — costs are low, resources focused on development.

Talent over quantity: By recruiting only top-tier engineers capable of working independently, Telegram prioritises quality (not headcount) to build infrastructure that scales.

Speed & autonomy: Decisions are faster when few people are involved. This enables quick feature rollouts and adaptability, even at global scale.

Global reach with minimal overhead: A small, distributed team can serve millions of users worldwide if automation and cloud infrastructure are strong.

What could be fragile

Scalability of human-dependent operations: Content moderation, customer support, security oversight — although partially automated — still typically require human judgment. A tiny core team may struggle with these as user base grows or regulatory pressure rises.

Single point of failure: With centralised decision-making (founder as sole product lead), missteps — strategic or operational — could have outsized effects.

Burnout / overwork risks: Small teams often mean heavy workload per person and less redundancy. Mistakes or staff turnover could disrupt operations.

Regulatory and compliance challenges: As global scrutiny on privacy, data protection, moderation increases, meeting legal and ethical standards may demand more specialized staff — something the lean model resists. 

What Telegram’s story reveals about modern tech & business

Telegram’s rise challenges a fundamental assumption: that global-scale digital services require thousands of employees, massive offices, and complex corporate structure. Instead, it demonstrates an alternate path: lean teams + automation + strong product + remote work + flat structure.

In an age where remote work is more accepted globally, Telegram may well become a blueprint — not just for messaging apps, but for startups and even established companies looking to remain nimble and cost-efficient.

Yet — it also raises big questions: can few people truly handle the moral, ethical and technical burdens that come with hosting a global communication platform? Will regulators and users accept a service run on skeletal human resources when content moderation and user safety become critical?

Telegram’s journey — from a simple private-messaging app to a multi-billion-dollar global platform — is more than a success story: it is a provocation. It asks: do we need big teams to build big things? Or can small, elite, mission-driven teams achieve more with less. 

As the digital world evolves, perhaps we’ll see more lean giants. Or — perhaps — this model will reveal its limits under pressure.

Attached is News article regarding telegram having no office or HR team and just 30 employee’s worth over 30bn 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump’s push to cut income taxes: what’s going on

In 2025, President Trump signed into law a sweeping tax-reform bill — One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB) — that makes permanent many of the income tax cuts first introduced under his 2017 legislation.  

Under the new law, individual income tax rates remain lower — avoiding the scheduled tax-rate increases that would have taken effect had the 2017 cuts expired.  

In addition, the bill introduces new deductions that could further reduce taxes for some households — for example, allowing Americans to deduct auto-loan interest under certain conditions (for U.S.-assembled cars bought 2025–2028) and other targeted benefits.  

But beyond making past cuts permanent, Trump has floated even more ambitious plans: in November 2025 he publicly suggested he might significantly reduce — or even completely eliminate — federal income tax, financed by revenue from tariffs on imports.  

Who stands to benefit — and who may not

 Beneficiaries

High earners and wealthy households — According to analyses, the tax benefits under Trump’s plan are heavily skewed toward the richest Americans. For example, million-dollar-plus households receive a disproportionately large share of the tax savings.  

Middle-income earners (to some extent) — Middle-class households would see modest reductions: estimates show average tax savings around $1,000 for many by 2026 compared with what they’d pay if the 2017 cuts had expired.  

Certain workers — Under the new bill and proposed reforms, specific groups such as service-industry workers receiving tips, or those earning overtime, could benefit from exemptions (for example, “no tax on tips” has been put into law).  

Who gains little or could even lose out

Lower-income Americans — For many in the bottom income brackets, the benefit is minimal. Because many already pay little federal income tax, the cuts might not move the needle much for them.  

Those bearing costs of tariffs and economic consequences — Trump’s strategy to fund deeper cuts (or complete elimination) via tariffs is controversial. Many experts warn that tariffs — essentially taxes on imports — raise consumer prices and hit lower- and middle-income households disproportionately.  

Public budgets, social programs, and overall economic equity — By cutting revenue so drastically, critics warn that long-term government funding for things like social safety nets, infrastructure, or public services could be at risk.  

Bigger picture: What’s at stake

Economic incentive vs. inequality. Supporters argue that lower income taxes spur growth, incentivise work and investment, and give Americans more take-home pay. Indeed, lowering income tax can increase disposable income and potentially fuel consumer spending and business investment.  

Funding trade-offs. The plan to offset lost income-tax revenue with tariff income is risky. Tariffs tend to increase costs for consumers, and foreign retaliation is a possibility, which could hurt U.S. trade and economic growth.  

Long-term fairness and fiscal health. While the wealthiest may enjoy substantial tax savings, the distribution of benefits raises concerns about fairness. With less revenue collected, pressure may build to cut social spending — which would disproportionately affect lower- and middle-income households.  

Political and social consequences. Such large-scale tax cuts and the abolition of progressive income tax could deepen income and wealth inequality. It may also fuel debates about the social contract, welfare, and what kind of government the United States should have.

What’s next — What to watch

Will the administration move forward to eliminate income tax entirely, as hinted? As of now, it remains a proposal. Some officials and economists doubt that tariff revenue will be sufficient to replace the lost tax revenue.  

How will the burden shift? If tariffs fund tax cuts, many households could see both higher consumer prices (through tariffs) and smaller or more uncertain gains in take-home pay — especially lower- and middle-income families.

What will happen to social programs, public debt and deficits? With huge revenue loss, difficult trade-offs loom: either deeper cuts to public services or increased national debt — both of which have long-term consequences.

Whether the tax-cut policy will survive political opposition. Tax reform has always been politically divisive; making tax cuts permanent or eliminating income tax altogether will face serious debate in Congress and among voters.

Conclusion

Trump’s push to cut income tax — codifying prior tax cuts and proposing even deeper reductions — represents one of the most ambitious fiscal efforts in recent U.S. history. For some Americans, especially very high earners, the benefits could be substantial. For many others, however, gains will be modest — and may come at the cost of increased inequality, higher prices, and uncertainty for social spending.

Attached is a News article regarding trump cutting income taxes in the us 

https://caliber.az/en/post/trump-says-us-could-almost-completely-eliminate-income-tax

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Thursday, 27 November 2025

Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Giorgia Meloni — what the record says about her father and alleged underworld links

Giorgia Meloni’s rise from a working-class Roman neighborhood to Italy’s premiership has long been accompanied by intense scrutiny of her personal history. Part of that scrutiny concerns her father, Francesco (often reported as “Franco”) Meloni, and media reporting about his criminal past and possible links to organised crime. Below I set out the verifiable record, what reputable reports have claimed, and what is—and importantly—is not supported by public evidence.

The verified facts

Conviction for drug trafficking in Spain (1995). Multiple contemporary reports and later profiles note that Francesco Meloni was arrested in the Balearics in the mid-1990s and sentenced in Spain for drug trafficking; some accounts say the sentence was around nine years. This is the core, documented fact at the centre of coverage.  

Large seizure reported. Several outlets reporting on the case at the time and later describe a major seizure of hashish (reports vary on the precise figure and wording used by different papers). Some local Spanish press and later English-language reports referenced large quantities connected to the arrest.  

Meloni’s public distancing and limited contact. Giorgia Meloni has repeatedly described being abandoned by her father as a child and having little or no contact with him for long periods. Biographical profiles used during her political rise quote her family background and note she was raised largely by her mother.  


Claims that go further — and the evidence (or lack of it)

Allegations of direct collusion with criminal organisations. Some media items and pieces citing statements from criminal informants or turncoats have suggested Francesco Meloni supplied drugs to criminal groups. For example, reporting that references mob informants’ claims has appeared in outlets such as The Times and some Italian investigative pieces. Those reports attribute the assertions to testimonies or sources inside organised-crime investigations rather than to court rulings directly tying Meloni senior to named mafia bosses. These are serious allegations but are based in the public record largely as sourced claims rather than as new judicial findings published against the prime minister or her immediate family in recent years.  

Economic links and business networks. Some investigative pieces and biographical write-ups have flagged alleged indirect economic connections involving a network of companies and property interests with names that intersect members of Meloni’s extended family. Such claims have been reported as lines of inquiry or disclosures based on documentation assembled by journalists; they have not been the subject, as of the most widely circulated reports, of criminal convictions of Giorgia Meloni herself. Where journalists suggest possible indirect links, they typically present them as matters for further scrutiny rather than settled legal findings.  

What the record does not show

There is no credible public record (court verdict or confirmed criminal charge) establishing that Giorgia Meloni herself has participated in drug trafficking or belonged to organised-crime groups. Allegations concerning her father’s past do not automatically or legally imply criminal responsibility on her part. Reputable outlets and legal commentators stress the distinction between a relative’s conviction and any unproven claim about a politician’s personal wrongdoing.  

Why the story matters — and why caution matters too

The parentage and background of political leaders are legitimately of public interest when they illuminate character, influence, or conflicts of interest. At the same time, responsible reporting must distinguish:

1. Documented judicial facts (arrests, convictions, sentences).

2. First-hand evidence tying people to criminal organisations (court rulings, wiretaps, prosecutorial findings).

3. Allegations and sourced claims from informants or third parties (which require careful corroboration).

4. Rumour or politically motivated smears (which deserve scepticism and verification).

In Meloni’s case, the documented fact that her father was arrested and convicted in Spain in the 1990s is well attested. Reports that place him within broader criminal networks rely on informants or journalistic reconstructions and should be treated as claims unless substantiated by court decisions or clear documentary evidence made public by competent authorities.  

Bottom line

Fact: Giorgia Meloni’s father was convicted for drug trafficking in Spain in the 1990s; that fact is reported by multiple outlets.  

Allegations beyond that fact: Some reports and informants have linked him to larger organised-crime networks; those claims appear in the press but rest on informant testimony and journalistic reconstruction rather than on newly published court rulings against Meloni or direct legal findings implicating her.  

No public evidence links Giorgia Meloni herself to criminal activity; responsible coverage should keep allegations about relatives separate from proven facts about the politician.

Attached is a news article regarding Georgia meloni father who was a drug dealer 

https://amp.majorcadailybulletin.com/news/local/2022/09/29/106323/mallorca-drugs-giorgia-meloni-father-was-jailed-for-trafficking.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Greta Thunberg and the Green Canal: A Protest at the Heart of Venice

On the weekend of 22–24 November 2025, Venice’s iconic waterways were transformed — at least temporarily — into a vivid symbol of environmental alert.   Among those involved was Greta Thunberg, who joined activists from Extinction Rebellion in pouring green dye into the celebrated Grand Canal.  

What Happened

The protest saw the waters of the Grand Canal dyed bright green using a fluorescent, “environmentally harmless” tracer dye — similar to substances used in environmental monitoring.  

The demonstration wasn’t confined to Venice: activists from Extinction Rebellion conducted parallel actions in other Italian cities, dyeing rivers, canals, fountains and lakes.  

In Venice, the group hung a large banner reading “Stop Ecocide” from the city’s historic Rialto Bridge, while many participants were dressed in red outfits and veiled faces — creating a dramatic, visually arresting scene.  

The protest was timed to coincide with the conclusion of the international COP30 UN climate conference in Brazil — a summit at which many climate activists felt global leaders failed to commit to sufficiently ambitious fossil-fuel reductions.  

Official Response & Consequences

Authorities moved quickly: Greta Thunberg and around 35 other activists were given a 48-hour ban from Venice and fined €150 (about £130–£132) each.  

The local administration, including regional governor Luca Zaia, condemned the act as a “disrespectful” gesture toward Venice’s fragile heritage and warned about possible environmental impacts.  

Environmental officials reportedly collected water samples after the dyeing to check for ecological damage. According to some sources, the green hue began dispersing naturally within hours thanks to tidal flow; yet critics argued that the stunt — regardless of its non-toxic dye — sets a troubling precedent for using public waterways as protest canvases.  


Motivation Behind the Protest

For Thunberg and fellow activists, the green-dye protest was meant as a bold — and visceral — metaphor: the unnatural colour of Venice’s normally serene waters was designed to jolt public attention to the “massive effects of climate collapse,” particularly on low-lying, vulnerable cities threatened by sea-level rise and environmental degradation.  

They explicitly linked the action to disappointment over the COP30 climate talks, criticizing government reluctance to include decisive fossil-fuel restrictions in global climate agreements.  

Supporters of the protest say such dramatic imagery is exactly what’s needed to break through public apathy. Some tourists and observers reportedly praised it as a “raw and real” depiction of ecological urgency.  

Debate & Criticism

But the action was far from universally applauded. Critics — including several Italian authorities — condemned it as disrespectful to Venice’s history and heritage, arguing that the city and its waterways should not be used as theatrical backdrops.  

Environmental sceptics questioned whether the “non-toxic” dye was truly harmless, raising concerns about potential impacts on aquatic life, light penetration, and water quality. Even if immediately biodegradable, such interventions may undermine long-term protections for sensitive ecosystems — especially in a lagoon as complex and fragile as Venice’s.

On the other hand, defenders argue that similar dyes are already used in hydrogeological studies worldwide — and that overreaction to colour may reflect political discomfort with disruptive protest more than real ecological danger.

What It Means for Climate Activism

This incident marks one of the most visible and controversial uses of physical spectacle in climate activism to date.

For activists: it shows how protest tactics are evolving beyond marches and speeches — turning historic, symbolic spaces into living canvases that force confrontation with environmental realities.

For authorities and heritage-conscious communities: it exposes the growing tension between the urgency of climate messaging and the imperative to preserve cultural and ecological integrity.

For the public: it raises uncomfortable questions — about where lines should be drawn between legitimate civil disobedience and potential environmental or cultural damage, and about whether shock-value activism achieves meaningful change or merely sparks headlines.

Whether one views the dye-stained waters as a cry for climate justice or a destructive stunt depends largely on one’s weighting of urgency versus preservation.

Attached is a news article regarding Greta Thunberg and the Green Canal: A Protest at the Heart of Venice

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/greta-thunberg-banned-venice-grand-canal-protest-b2871264.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Britain’s first AI police assistant goes live in trial — but it’s virtual, not robotic (London briefing)

The UK has taken a cautious step into policing with artificial intelligence: a new AI virtual assistant called “Bobbi” has been launched in a trial to answer non-emergency public queries for two forces, while separate trials of drones and robot dogs continue to test physical robotics for frontline support. The move underlines how forces are experimenting with automation to ease pressure on call handlers — but it also raises questions about scope, transparency and oversight.  

What’s happening

Thames Valley Police and the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary have rolled out Bobbi, an AI-driven virtual assistant designed to respond to frequently asked, non-emergency questions and point people towards the right services and information. Bobbi uses force-provided (closed-source) information — the same guidance call handlers consult — and is explicitly not intended for emergency use or to investigate crimes. The trial launched in late November 2025.  

Local spokespeople say the assistant is aimed at reducing demand for human call handlers and digital desks, so staff can focus on urgent incidents. Bobbi interacts in a conversational way and can signpost users to forms, advice pages or the right local team. The creators stress the system is a tool to assist the public and the service, not to replace policing work.  

Not a walking robot on the beat

Although headlines about “police robots” often conjure images of roaming, humanoid machines, Bobbi is a chatbot: a virtual, web-facing assistant. Separately, the UK has been trialling physical robotic technologies in limited roles — for example, robotic dogs for hazardous reconnaissance and drones as rapid responders feeding live intelligence to officers. Those trials are for specific operational tasks and are subject to separate testing, legal and ethical reviews. The virtual assistant trial should not be confused with fully autonomous street patrol robots.  

Safeguards, transparency and public trust

Critics and civil-liberties groups warn that any AI in policing must be transparent, auditable and used with clear human oversight. Key concerns include data protection, how training data is selected, whether biases could creep into automated advice, and ensuring routes for redress when the assistant gives incorrect guidance. Police forces involved say Bobbi relies only on force-provided information and that any escalation to a human is straightforward — but watchdogs are watching closely.  

What the forces say

In statements accompanying the launch, Chief Officers emphasised Bobbi’s role as an assistant to the public and staff, not a replacement for people answering calls. They noted the trial will be closely evaluated to measure accuracy, user satisfaction, demand reduction and any unintended consequences before any wider rollout is considered. 

Looking ahead

The trial is part of a wider UK pattern of experimenting with automation in policing: Met Police drone pilots in London, robot-dog tests by some forces, and virtual assistants elsewhere. Each technology brings different benefits and risks. Virtual assistants may offer immediate load-saving benefits with relatively low physical-safety risk, while drones and robot dogs raise greater operational, legal and ethical questions that require detailed frameworks before widespread deployment. Public engagement, transparency of evaluation results, and clear rules on accountability will be crucial if more AI and robotic tools are to be adopted.  

Bottom line: Bobbi marks the UK’s first public-facing AI police virtual assistant trial — a software step into AI-enabled policing rather than a robot on London’s streets. It’s an incremental experiment with potential benefits for stretched services, but it comes with the usual caveats about oversight, privacy and the need for transparent evaluation before any wider adoption.  

Attached is a news article regarding the new police AI robot being tested on the streets of London 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxw9xnk7rzo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

















Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Heavy Snowfall in Kamchatka Buries Apartment Blocks and Disrupts Daily Life A powerful winte...