Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,
Starlink pours thousands of satellites into low-Earth orbit — and AT&T is meeting the threat with partnerships, not rockets
SpaceX’s Starlink has reshaped the satcom landscape by doing what few legacy operators ever attempted: mass-producing and launching thousands of low-Earth-orbit (LEO) broadband satellites, at a cadence and scale that is changing who — and how — the world stays connected. That push has left traditional players such as AT&T — a giant in terrestrial telecoms but not a large owner of space assets — scrambling to compete through partnerships, spectrum deals and service integrations. Here’s how the two strategies stack up in late-2025.
How many Starlinks are up there — and how fast are they going
Starlink’s deployment in 2025 continued at a blistering pace. Recent mission reports show Falcon 9 flights through December adding roughly 24–32 satellites per batch, with dozens of launches across the year. Independent trackers and industry reporting put the Starlink constellation at over 9,000 active satellites by December 2025 (with total launched satellites exceeding 9,300 in some tallies). Those launches include the latest Starlink “V2 Mini” batches used to expand coverage and capacity.
SpaceX’s model is simple and aggressive: build satellites in quantity, fly them frequently with the reusable Falcon 9, iterate design rapidly (V1 → V2 Mini and other variants) and sell broadband directly to consumers, enterprises, airlines and governments. That operational tempo makes Starlink the single largest single-operator satellite constellation on orbit today and accounts for a large fraction of newly launched satellites worldwide.
AT&T’s approach: partner, integrate, and leverage spectrum — not mass launch
AT&T is one of the world’s largest telecom operators, but it is not competing with SpaceX by building and launching its own mega-constellation. Instead, AT&T has pursued a partnership and integration model:
• Commercial agreements with AST SpaceMobile (the “BlueBird” satellites) have enabled AT&T to trial native voice, text and video calls passing over satellite using AT&T spectrum — milestones reported through 2024–2025 included initial commercial BlueBird launches and demonstrator calls.
• AT&T continues to rely on established geostationary satellite providers (Viasat, Intelsat) as the backhaul for many aviation and enterprise services; for example, major airline connectivity deals involve Viasat/Intelsat capacity that AT&T can manage or resell in various packages.
Put simply: AT&T is strengthening its service portfolio with satellite partnerships (direct-to-device trials, FirstNet resilience work, inflight Wi-Fi integrations) rather than trying to replicate Starlink’s vertically integrated launch-and-fleet model. This gives AT&T quicker market entry in niche use cases (first responders, direct handset coverage in underserved areas, aviation customers) without the upfront capital and orbital launch program that SpaceX executes.
Where the competition actually plays out
The rivalry between Starlink and AT&T isn’t a simple “who has more satellites” contest — it’s a battle across several business axes:
• Coverage & latency: Starlink’s LEO network offers low latency and growing global coverage for consumer and enterprise broadband. That makes it attractive for home internet, maritime, and some aviation use cases. AT&T’s satellite play, via partners, focuses on providing continuity for mobile customers, critical voice/text for first-responders (FirstNet), and managed connectivity for airlines and enterprise customers.
• Business model: SpaceX vertically integrates (manufacture → launch → retail service). AT&T leverages partner capacity and integrates satellite links into its broader mobile and IoT service stack — often reselling or managing satcom capacity alongside terrestrial networks.
• Regulatory & spectrum: Starlink needs regulatory approvals globally for spectrum use and services (and faces increasing scrutiny over space debris and radio coordination). AT&T brings spectrum holdings and regulatory relationships to the table, enabling it to repurpose licensed terrestrial spectrum for satellite-passed voice/data in partnership arrangements.
• Customer segments: Starlink has moved aggressively into consumer and enterprise broadband, IoT, and even direct-to-cell smartphone connectivity (new partnerships demonstrate direct-to-mobile ambitions). AT&T targets B2B, government/FirstNet, aviation, and mobile-subscriber continuity — markets where a trusted telco relationship and integrated billing/networking matter.
Industry implications: scale, congestion and consolidation
Starlink’s sheer scale has shifted market dynamics:
• Orbital congestion & policy: Thousands of small LEO satellites raise questions about collision risk, spectrum coordination, and regulatory oversight. Policymakers and space situational awareness groups are more focused than ever.
• Pressure on legacy GEO players: Operators that once dominated in geostationary orbit (Intelsat, Viasat, Eutelsat) now face competition in capacity and latency. Some are pivoting to partnerships, focusing on niche high-throughput GEO services or integrating with LEO players. This market evolution favors flexible providers (including telecoms that can stitch services together) and nimble satellite manufacturers.
• Consolidation and partnerships: Expect more alliances like AT&T + AST SpaceMobile, airline carriage deals, and national telecom collaborations with LEO providers — because owning a satellite fleet is no longer the only route to satellite-enabled services.
So who’s “winning”
If winning means owning the most satellites and rapidly expanding global LEO coverage, Starlink is indisputably ahead — the constellation grew into the thousands in a few years and continues to add capacity. If winning means delivering integrated services to mobile subscribers, enterprise clients and governments without large space-program investment, AT&T’s partnership model is very competitive: it leverages existing infrastructure, regulatory licenses and customer relationships to deliver satellite-enhanced services quickly.
Bottom line — different plays for different problems
Starlink’s mass-launch, in-house model is rewriting expectations for satellite broadband: speed of deployment, retail reach and the growing use of LEO for consumer internet. AT&T, while not launching thousands of satellites, is not absent from the market — it is pursuing a pragmatic route of partnerships and integrations that play to a telco’s strengths (spectrum, billing, network integration, relationships with enterprises and governments). The near future will be less about a single winner and more about who can best combine terrestrial and satellite assets to meet customers where they are.
Attached is a news article regarding the amount of starlink satellite entering in to space and the competition between AT&T
Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley
In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>
<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc
