AD

Tuesday, 6 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Beneath the Thames: The Hidden Greenwich Foot Tunnel and the Cooke Family

By the time the river fog rolled in, Greenwich seemed to fold in on itself. Lamps blurred into halos, the air smelt of coal smoke and salt, and the Thames carried the low, patient sound of a city at work. Few of those hurrying along the riverfront at the turn of the 20th century gave much thought to what lay beneath their feet. Fewer still knew the story of the family who quietly kept it alive.

The Greenwich Foot Tunnel opened in 1902, a marvel of Victorian and Edwardian engineering: a tiled artery beneath the Thames, linking the dockyards of the Isle of Dogs with the workshops and streets of south-east London. It was built for working people—dockers, shipwrights, cleaners, messengers—anyone whose day depended on crossing the river without paying a ferry fare or waiting for a bridge miles away.

Hidden behind its cast-iron domes and spiralling staircases was another world entirely.

For the Cooke family, the tunnel was not just a passageway; it was home, duty, and inheritance.

Thomas Cooke was a tunnel keeper, a modest title that disguised the scale of responsibility it carried. Each morning before dawn, he descended into the tiled cylinder with a lantern and a broom, checking for leaks, cracks, loose tiles, or the subtle tremor that might signal trouble above. The Thames pressed down relentlessly, thousands of tonnes of water separated from the tunnel by brick, iron, and faith in engineering.

His wife, Margaret, kept the ledger and the keys. She knew the rhythm of the lifts—the groan of cables, the shudder as the carriage settled—and could tell by sound alone when something was wrong. In winter, when frost seized the mechanisms, she brewed tea strong enough to revive frozen hands and sharper spirits. She also kept watch on the people passing through: the exhausted dockers, the barefoot boys running errands, the widows crossing to clean offices they would never enter by daylight.

Their children grew up between the riverbanks, learning early that the tunnel had moods. On quiet nights, it hummed softly, as if breathing. During storms, water seeped through hairline cracks, gathering in shining beads along the white tiles. Thomas taught his eldest son, Alfred, how to listen—how to press an ear to the wall and distinguish the normal murmur of the river from the sound of danger.

The official histories talk of engineering triumphs and municipal pride. They rarely mention the small, human moments: Margaret guiding a frightened horse-handler through the darkness after a ferry sank upstream; Thomas carrying an injured docker on his back when the lifts failed; the children chalking hopscotch squares on the tunnel floor, quickly erased by the boots of a waking city.

During the First World War, the tunnel took on another role. Blackouts turned it into a shadowy refuge, a place where soldiers crossed in silence, boots echoing like distant gunfire. The Cookes stayed on, even as air raids crept closer to London. Leaving, Thomas said, would feel like abandoning a living thing.

By the time Alfred grew old enough to take over, the world above had changed. Docks declined, traffic roared overhead, and lifts were replaced and repaired more times than anyone could count. Yet the tunnel endured—cleaned, patched, watched over—its survival owed as much to quiet vigilance as to concrete and steel.

Today, tourists hurry through with cameras, marvelling at the curve of the tiles and the strange calm beneath the river. Few know the names of those who kept the water out and the lights on. The Cooke family left no statue, no plaque. Their legacy is subtler: every dry step, every safe crossing, every echo that fades harmlessly into the distance.

The Greenwich Foot Tunnel remains a hidden vein of the city, and if you pause long enough beneath the Thames, you might still sense it—the careful listening, the steady hands, and the lives that once stood guard so others could pass safely through.

Attached is a news article regarding the hidden Greenwich foot tunnel and the crooks family 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

















Monday, 5 January 2026

Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

A Greenland Attack Could Mark the Beginning of the End for NATO

The idea of an attack on Greenland may sound far-fetched, but any hostile move against the Arctic territory would represent one of the most severe tests the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has ever faced. Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, is strategically vital to Western security, and an attack on it could expose deep fractures within the alliance—potentially threatening NATO’s very survival.

Greenland sits at the crossroads of the Arctic, North America, and Europe. It hosts critical US military infrastructure, including Thule Air Base (now Pituffik Space Base), which plays a central role in missile warning systems, space surveillance, and Arctic defence. Under NATO’s collective defence principle—Article 5—an attack on Greenland would be considered an attack on all member states.

However, invoking Article 5 is not automatic. It requires political unity, consensus, and a willingness among all members to respond militarily. In today’s fractured geopolitical environment, that unity is far from guaranteed.


A Test NATO May Not Pass

NATO has expanded rapidly in recent years, bringing in countries with differing military capabilities, political priorities, and risk tolerance. While some members—particularly the United States, the UK, and Nordic states—would likely push for a strong response, others may hesitate, fearing escalation with a nuclear-armed adversary such as Russia or a rising power like China.

If even a handful of NATO members refused to commit troops or resources, the credibility of the alliance would be severely damaged. NATO’s power has always rested not just on military strength, but on the belief that its members will act together. A failure to respond decisively to an attack on Greenland would signal that Article 5 is negotiable—and once that belief is shattered, the alliance’s deterrence collapses.

Arctic Competition and Rising Tensions

The Arctic is becoming a new frontline in global power competition. Melting ice is opening new shipping routes and access to vast reserves of rare earth minerals, oil, and gas. Both Russia and China have increased their Arctic ambitions, investing heavily in military capabilities, research stations, and infrastructure across the region.

Greenland’s resources and location make it a prime strategic target. Any aggressive move there—whether through military action, hybrid warfare, cyberattacks, or covert destabilisation—would likely be designed to test NATO’s resolve without triggering a full-scale war.

The United States Factor

Much would depend on the United States. NATO is heavily reliant on American military power, intelligence, and logistics. If Washington responded forcefully, NATO might hold together. But if US leadership hesitated, focused inward, or chose a unilateral approach outside NATO structures, the alliance could fracture rapidly.

A US decision to act alone—or not at all—would raise existential questions for European allies about NATO’s relevance and reliability.

The End of NATO as We Know It

An attack on Greenland would not just be a regional crisis; it would be a moment of truth for NATO. A strong, unified response could reinforce the alliance for decades to come. But hesitation, division, or inaction could expose NATO as a paper tiger—an alliance bound more by words than by will.

In that scenario, NATO might not formally dissolve, but its authority, deterrence, and purpose would be fatally weakened. For adversaries watching closely, that outcome would mark the beginning of a new and far more dangerous global order—one in which NATO no longer stands as the cornerstone of Western security.

Attached is a news article regarding the Greenland attack could be the end of NATO 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/05/trump-must-give-up-fantasies-about-annexation-says-greenland-pm

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Over-70s to Face New Driving Tests as Government Tightens Road Safety Rules’

The UK Government is moving towards stronger measures for drivers aged over 70, re-examining how older motorists maintain their licences amid concerns around road safety. The proposals — part of the first major update to Britain’s road safety strategy in nearly two decades — could see older drivers undergo mandatory checks to continue driving, ending the long-standing self-declaration system that many critics say is outdated and unsafe.  

What’s Changing

Under current UK law, motorists must simply renew their driving licence every three years once they turn 70, without having to take any formal driving or fitness test. While drivers must confirm they meet basic medical standards, this is currently based on self-reporting, and no compulsory check of vision, reaction times or overall ability is required.  

The proposed overhaul would introduce several new requirements:

Compulsory Eye Tests Every Three Years: Once a driver reaches the age of 70, they would be required to pass a vision check at the time of licence renewal. Failure to do so could mean losing the right to drive. This replaces the current system where drivers simply tick a box confirming their eyesight is adequate.  

Consideration of Cognitive or Medical Checks: Transport officials are also assessing whether additional assessments — including cognitive or health-related medical checks — should be added to ensure people are fit to drive. While no final decision has been made, ministers have acknowledged that age-related conditions can affect driving ability and that the safety strategy must reflect this.  

These changes are being framed by ministers as a balance between independence and safety: enabling older people to drive for as long as possible, but with proper checks in place to ensure they remain safe on the roads.  

Why the Focus on Over-70s?

Road safety data shows that older drivers — especially those over 70 — are more likely to be involved in fatal collisions compared with some other age groups. Officials argue that as people age, health changes such as deteriorating vision, slower reaction times and cognitive issues can increasingly affect driving. ‎ 

Advocacy groups such as the College of Optometrists have welcomed the push for compulsory eye tests, describing the current UK system as among the laxest in Europe. They argue that regular, regulated sight testing can detect problems earlier and help protect both the driver and other road users.  

Public and Sector Reaction

The proposals have met with mixed reaction:

Support for Safety: Many road users and safety campaigners support the idea of more robust checks for older drivers, arguing that baseline assessments could reduce accidents and give families greater peace of mind. A recent survey suggested that 67 per cent of UK motorists think senior drivers should undergo some form of mandatory retesting once they reach a certain age.  

Concerns Over Independence: Some older drivers’ groups caution that overly rigid testing could harm independence and mobility among seniors, especially in rural areas where public transport alternatives are limited. They argue that assessments should be supportive and tailored rather than punitive.  

Age UK, a charity representing older people, has also weighed in, noting that while safety is paramount, any new rules must be introduced carefully so they do not unfairly penalise safe and capable drivers.  

What Happens Next

The Government’s full Road Safety Strategy is due to be published soon, and it is expected to set out final details on these proposals and a timetable for implementation. Transport ministers say the aim is to cut road deaths and serious injuries by 65 per cent by 2035, and stronger rules for older drivers are a key part of that plan.  

If approved, the new requirements could represent the biggest shake-up in how older drivers maintain their licences in more than a decade — potentially reshaping the way Britain’s ageing population stays safe and mobile on the roads.

Attached is a news article regarding over 70s need to take driving test as government take stronger laws 

https://www.mylondon.news/news/uk-world-news/eye-tests-drivers-over-70-33172813.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump’s Greenland Gambit: Strategic Defence and the Rare Earths Race

In early 2025 and into 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump reignited one of the most controversial foreign-policy ideas of his political career: acquiring Greenland — not as a tourism destination, but as a geopolitical and industrial prize critical to America’s defence posture and its ambitions to break China’s dominance in rare earth minerals.

A Strategic Outpost in a New Cold War

Greenland, an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, sits at the gateway to the Arctic — a region rapidly becoming a flashpoint in great-power rivalry. Its location offers proximity to the North Pole, control over key airspace, and oversight of key maritime approaches between North America and Europe. The U.S. has long maintained military installations there, such as the Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base), which plays a role in early-warning systems and missile defence networks. Trump and his advisers argue that securing formal control over the entire island would strengthen the United States’ ability to monitor Russian and Chinese military moves in the far north, bolstering NATO’s northern flank and deterring potential adversaries.  

In public remarks and interviews, Trump has repeatedly framed Greenland as “essential” to U.S. national security and defence strategy, comparing its value to historical territorial acquisitions. He has even suggested that the United States could use economic pressure or, in his own words, “one way or another… get Greenland.”  

Rare Earths: The Metals of Modern Power

While strategic positioning forms the official rationale, there’s also a powerful economic logic: Greenland harbours vast deposits of critical minerals, especially rare earth elements. These are the heavy metals used in advanced weapons systems, electronics, electric vehicles, wind turbines, and other high-tech applications. Their supply chains are currently dominated by China — which accounts for a majority share of global production — leaving the United States and its allies vulnerable to geopolitical leverage.  

According to geological surveys, Greenland contains a rich array of resources, including rare earths, graphite, niobium, tantalum, and other critical materials. These minerals are seen as vital not only for consumer technology but also for defence manufacturing and emerging energy systems. Reducing reliance on Chinese suppliers is now a central aim of U.S. industrial policy, and access to Greenland’s deposits could play a part in that effort.  

Business interests aligned with this goal have already taken action. U.S. firms, sometimes backed by major institutional investors, are exploring mining projects on the island — and American delegations have visited Greenland to foster partnerships and evaluate the mineral potential.  

Diplomatic Backlash and Legal Realities

Trump’s rhetoric has sparked a sharp diplomatic backlash. Danish leaders, including Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenland’s own Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen, have forcefully rejected any suggestion that Greenland is for sale or that the U.S. has a right to annex it. They emphasise international law, Greenland’s self-government, and the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark. European allies have echoed these sentiments, warning that any attempt to seize the island could fracture NATO and ignite a major geopolitical crisis.  

Legally, Greenland is not U.S. territory. Danish sovereignty and international norms protect it from unilateral annexation. Efforts by some U.S. lawmakers to introduce legislation facilitating a purchase or suggesting even renaming the island reflect political theatre more than substantive treaty prospects.  

What Comes Next

As of early 2026, Trump’s push to acquire Greenland remains overwhelmingly symbolic rather than actionable. It has nonetheless drawn attention to the strategic and economic role of the Arctic — spotlighting how climate change, new shipping routes, and global competition for critical minerals are reshaping global geopolitics.

Even if the idea of outright acquisition fades, the debate has already accelerated international interest in Greenland’s mineral wealth and military value, triggering renewed investment and cooperation efforts by the U.S., European powers, and Greenlandic authorities themselves. Whether this turns into deeper defence partnerships or resource development agreements, the Greenland question will continue to be a barometer of shifting global priorities in the 21st century.

Attached is a news article regarding trump taking over Greenland for the resources 

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/01/05/why-does-trump-want-greenland-so-badly-and-what-could-it-mean-for-europe

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

UK Mourns as Anthony Joshua’s Closest Friends Are Laid to Rest

London, 4 January 2026 — A sombre and deeply emotional farewell took place in the United Kingdom on Sunday as family, friends and members of the boxing community gathered to honour the lives of Abdul Latif “Latz” Ayodele and Sina Ghami — two cherished members of heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua’s inner circle.  

The pair were killed in a tragic road accident on 29 December 2025 on the Lagos–Ibadan Expressway in Nigeria when the vehicle they were travelling in with Joshua collided with a stationary truck. While Joshua survived with minor injuries, both Latz, his personal trainer, and Ghami, his long-time strength and conditioning coach, died at the scene.  

Funerals and Prayer Services in London

The ceremonies began at 10 a.m. at the London Central Mosque in Regent’s Park, where an Islamic janaza (funeral prayer) was held to honour both men. The mosque was filled with mourners, with hundreds queuing outside to pay their respects in a quiet but powerful show of solidarity and grief.  

After the janaza prayer, additional funeral rites continued throughout the day. A separate funeral service for Sina Ghami was held later at Hendon Cemetery & Crematorium, followed by a wake at Cavendish Banqueting Hall in North West London, allowing those close to the deceased a final opportunity to celebrate their lives and legacy.  

Personal Tributes and Public Mourning

Anthony Joshua returned to London to stand with the families during these final moments, visibly shaken but resolute in his tribute. In a poignant social media post shared amid the day’s events, he captioned images of him alongside their loved ones: “My Brother’s Keeper.”  

The turnout reflected not only the personal impact of Latz and Sina on those who knew them, but also the respect they earned across the wider sporting community. Mourners from diverse backgrounds gathered to honour the dedication, passion and support the two men provided in helping shape Joshua’s journey.  

A Legacy Remembered

Friends and family described both Ayodele and Ghami as more than just colleagues — they were loyal companions whose influence extended far beyond their professional roles. Their deaths have prompted an outpouring of tributes from supporters in the UK, Nigeria and around the world.  

As the boxing world and the wider public continue to mourn, the London services offered a moment of unity and reflection — a chance to remember two lives that played a significant role in the life of one of Britain’s biggest sporting stars.

Attached is a news article regarding Anthony Joshua friends funeral that was held in the uk 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing/article-15432865/amp/anthony-joshua-crash-update.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Real Reason Trump Is Interested in Venezuela’s Oil

On January 4, 2026, former U.S. President Donald Trump publicly framed U.S. intervention in Venezuela as part of a broader national security strategy — but his rhetoric and actions make one thing clear: oil is central to Trump’s Venezuela policy.  

Venezuela’s Massive Oil Reserves

Venezuela holds the largest proven oil reserves in the world, estimated at roughly 300 billion barrels. That’s far more than Saudi Arabia or any other OPEC nation.  

Although production collapsed from historical highs of millions of barrels per day to around 1 million barrels recently, the potential volume remains enormous if the sector were revived.  

Trump’s Strategic Rationale

Trump’s recent statements and policy moves show a convergence of economic, geopolitical, and political motives:

1. Securing a Valuable Commodity

Even though the U.S. is a major oil producer and imports far less oil than in the past, Venezuelan crude — especially heavy crude — remains valuable:

U.S. Gulf Coast refineries were historically built to process heavy sour oil like Venezuela’s, not the lighter shale oil the U.S. currently produces.  

Analysts have argued that increased Venezuelan oil flows could help U.S. refineries operate more efficiently and profitably, potentially displacing other foreign supplies. 

This helps explain why, in Trump’s telling, American oil companies would pour “billions” into rebuilding Venezuela’s oil complex and why the U.S. might sell that oil internationally as part of its strategy.  

2. Reclaiming Economic Influence

Trump has repeatedly claimed that the Venezuelan state “stole” oil assets from the United States — a narrative that critics argue is rhetorical rather than legally grounded.  

Yet this framing justifies a more assertive U.S. role and aligns with Trump’s broader agenda of asserting U.S. dominance in global energy markets.

3. Weakening Strategic Rivals

For years, Venezuela’s crude has flowed primarily to China, which became its largest buyer after U.S. sanctions cut off direct exports.  

Reorienting Venezuelan oil away from China and toward U.S. or U.S.-friendly markets would reduce Chinese leverage and strengthen U.S. geopolitical influence — a key goal for Trump’s foreign policy.

4. Economic and Domestic Political Appeal

Trump’s emphasis on resources like oil plays well to his “America First” base, appealing to voters concerned about U.S. industrial capacity, jobs, and energy dominance. Reclaiming Venezuelan oil is presented as a way to boost American economic strength while weakening adversaries.  

It’s Not Just About Oil Alone

Despite the focus on oil, there are additional layers to the strategy:

Sanctions and tariffs: The Trump administration previously imposed a 25 % tariff on countries importing Venezuelan oil to cut Maduro’s regime off economically and reduce its global influence.  

Drug policy narrative: Trump has tied the Venezuela intervention to combating drug trafficking and national security — a justification critics see as secondary to energy interests.  

Political influence in Latin America: Reasserting U.S. dominance close to home fits within a broader approach to counter authoritarian allies of Russia, China, and Iran. 

What This Means for U.S. Dependence on Oil

While the U.S. isn’t dependent on foreign oil as it once was — domestic production now exceeds imports — oil remains strategically important:

Access to heavy crude can help certain refinery operations.

Global oil markets still affect economic and geopolitical stability.

Control or influence over a major oil reserve channels economic and diplomatic leverage.

Critics and Skeptics

Not everyone agrees that oil should be the central focus:

Some experts argue Venezuela’s oil infrastructure is too degraded and expensive to fix quickly, reducing the appeal for U.S. firms.  

Others see Trump’s oil rhetoric as a cover for broader geopolitical goals or a continuation of resource-driven foreign policy.  

In sum, while the U.S. may not need Venezuelan oil to meet its domestic energy needs, the former president’s intense focus on Venezuela stems from a mix of economic opportunity, geopolitical competition, and political messaging — with oil at the heart of each.

Attached is a news article regarding the real reason why Venezuela matters over its oil production 

https://www.npr.org/2026/01/04/nx-s1-5665795/trump-us-oil-companies-venezuela

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Sunday, 4 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Black Death: How a Medieval Village Was Silenced by the Plague

In the mid-14th century, a deadly force swept across Europe, leaving devastation in its wake. Known as the Black Death, the bubonic plague did not merely thin populations—it erased entire communities from existence. Across England and the continent, once-thriving medieval villages were reduced to abandoned ruins, their fields left untended and their churches silent. The story of one such village reveals the terrifying reality of life—and death—during the worst pandemic in human history.

A Village on the Brink

Before the plague arrived, the village was much like hundreds of others scattered across medieval Europe. Stone cottages clustered around a small church, families lived by farming the land, and daily life followed the rhythm of the seasons. Most villagers had never travelled more than a few miles from home, and news from the outside world arrived slowly, carried by merchants or clergy.

Rumours of a deadly sickness began circulating in 1348. Stories told of towns overseas where people died within days, their bodies marked by dark swellings. Few villagers understood the danger—disease was common in medieval life—but nothing could prepare them for what was coming.

The Arrival of Death

The Black Death arrived silently, likely carried by fleas living on rats that travelled along trade routes. At first, only a handful of villagers fell ill. They complained of fever, chills, and unbearable pain. Within days, dark, swollen lumps—buboes—appeared under the arms and around the groin. Victims often died within 48 hours.

As the illness spread, fear took hold. Families locked themselves indoors. Priests were overwhelmed, performing last rites almost constantly until many of them, too, succumbed. Church bells rang so frequently for funerals that they eventually fell silent—there were no bell ringers left.


Breakdown of Society

With no understanding of bacteria or infection, villagers turned to prayer, superstition, and desperation. Some believed the plague was God’s punishment. Others blamed poisoned wells, strangers, or even neighbours. Medical treatments were brutal and ineffective, including bloodletting and herbal poultices.

As deaths mounted, normal life collapsed. Crops rotted in the fields as farmers died. Animals wandered unattended. Survivors fled, spreading the disease further, while others stayed behind, caring for the sick at the cost of their own lives.

Graves quickly filled. When burial grounds overflowed, bodies were placed in mass pits, often without coffins or ceremony. In some villages, entire families died within weeks, leaving homes abandoned and doors swinging open to the wind.

A Village Lost to History

By the time the plague burned itself out, the village was gone. More than half of its population had died—sometimes as many as 70 percent. With too few survivors to farm the land or rebuild, the settlement was abandoned altogether. Over time, nature reclaimed the site. Roofs collapsed, paths disappeared, and the village faded from memory.

Today, such places are known as “deserted medieval villages.” Archaeological remains—church foundations, pottery shards, mass burial sites—tell the story of communities wiped out almost overnight. They stand as silent witnesses to the scale of the catastrophe.

The Legacy of the Black Death

The Black Death killed an estimated 25 to 50 million people across Europe—around a third of the population. Yet from the devastation came profound change. Labour shortages gave surviving workers more power, weakening the feudal system. Wages rose, social structures shifted, and Europe began a slow transformation toward the modern age.

For the villages that vanished, however, there was no rebirth. Their stories remain etched into the landscape, reminders of how fragile life was in medieval times.

The Black Death was not just a disease—it was an event that reshaped history. And in the ruins of forgotten villages lie the echoes of lives cut short, communities erased, and a world forever changed.

Attached is a news article regarding the Black Death and the entire medieval village killed by the plague 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/middle_ages/plague_countryside_01.shtml

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Hidden Threads: Children Working in Bangladesh’s Fashion Factories

Bangladesh is one of the world’s most important centres of garment production. The country supplies clothing to some of the biggest global fashion brands and is the second-largest exporter of ready-made garments after China. But behind the low prices and fast turnaround times lurks a human rights challenge that has resisted full eradication: the use of child labour in fashion factories and their subcontracted supply chains.  

A Persistent and Hidden Problem

Official data and recent research suggest that child labour remains present deep within Bangladesh’s garment sector, even if direct employment by major export factories has declined. A 2025 study by the University of Nottingham’s Rights Lab and GoodWeave International found that child labour exists particularly in subcontracted or lower-tier factories supplying the global ready-made garment (RMG) industry. In interviews with minors working in these settings, 100% were found to be illegally employed as child labourers.  

In some industrial hubs around Dhaka, surveys indicate that young workers — many between the ages of 5 and 17 — are employed across thousands of small factories. In one large apparel area, nearly half of all workers were reported to be children, with tens of thousands aged under 14.  

The Reality of Child Work in Factories

Children in these settings often face long hours, low or no pay, and dangerous conditions:

Many work 10–14 hours per day on repetitive sewing and finishing tasks to meet production deadlines.  

Wages for child workers are typically very low — in some reports, equivalent to under $12 per month — and older children sometimes receive little more than room and board.  

Poor health and safety conditions prevail. These can include unhygienic environments, blocked fire exits, heavy machinery, and exposure to dust and hazardous substances, all of which raise the risk of injury and long-term health issues.  

Such conditions often deny children both education and a safe childhood, underlining the international definition of child labour as work that is mentally, physically, socially or morally harmful and interferes with schooling.  

Drivers of Child Labour

Several factors contribute to this ongoing issue:

Poverty and Economic Pressure:

Many families in Bangladesh live on the margins. When adults cannot earn enough to support their households, children — especially in informal or unregulated factory settings — are sometimes pressed into work to help make ends meet.  

Subcontracting and Supply Chains:

Global fashion brands often work with layers of subcontractors. While many major suppliers claim to follow strict labour standards, children can be present in the hidden tiers of the supply chain where oversight is weak.  

Weak Enforcement and Informality:

Even though Bangladeshi law sets a minimum working age, enforcement is patchy in small workshops or informal units. Official records may undercount child labour where employers fail to report it or falsify age documents.  

Consequences Beyond the Factory Floor

The impacts extend far beyond factory walls. Children working long hours are often unable to attend school, limiting their future employment opportunities and trapping families in cycles of poverty. Being exposed to hazardous conditions at a young age can lead to chronic health problems and psychological stress.

Moreover, reliance on child labour can undermine broader social and human development goals, including educational attainment and national economic progress.

Global and Local Responses

In recent decades, concerted efforts by governments, international organisations, NGOs, and fashion brands have helped reduce overt child labour in direct supply chains:

Major brands have adopted “zero tolerance” policies on child labour, especially in factories they audit directly.  

Initiatives such as the Child Rights Action Hub aim to extend prevention and remediation efforts deeper into lower-tier suppliers and subcontractors.  

International pressure, including legislation like the EU’s forced labour regulations, encourages more transparency and accountability across global supply chains.  

Yet challenges remain. Industry leaders sometimes dispute claims about the scale of child labour in export supply, saying compliance efforts are robust, even as independent research highlights ongoing risks.  

Looking Ahead

Ending child labour in Bangladesh’s fashion industry will require a multifaceted approach — one that strengthens enforcement of labour laws, supports families economically so they do not have to send children to work, improves education access, and deepens transparency in global fashion supply chains. Only through sustained collaboration between governments, brands, civil society, and consumers can the true cost of cheap clothing be acknowledged and addressed.

Attached is a news article regarding children working in fashion factories in Bangladeshi 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/06/bangladesh-garment-factories-child-labour-uk

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro Seized and Flown to New York

In a stunning and unprecedented military and law-enforcement operation on January 3, 2026, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured by United States forces in Caracas and transported to New York to face criminal charges, according to U.S. officials and multiple international media sources.  

The operation, described by the Trump administration as a coordinated military and legal mission, marked a dramatic escalation in U.S.–Venezuela tensions and drew widespread global attention — and controversy.  

The Capture and Transfer

According to U.S. accounts, the operation involved air, land, and sea components, with strikes targeting key Venezuelan military sites in Caracas during the pre-dawn hours. Maduro and Flores were seized at a residence near the capital before being taken aboard U.S. military assets, including the USS Iwo Jima, and flown to the United States.  

Footage and reports from U.S. media showed Maduro handcuffed and shackled as he was escorted off a plane at Stewart Air National Guard Base in Newburgh, New York, before being transferred to federal custody.  

Once in New York, Maduro was taken to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, a federal facility where high-profile detainees are held, and is expected to make a courtroom appearance in the coming days.  

Criminal Charges in the U.S.

Maduro and others — including members of his inner circle — have been indicted in the Southern District of New York on a range of narco-terrorism, cocaine importation, and weapons charges that stem from longstanding U.S. investigations into Venezuelan involvement in international drug trafficking.  

The U.S. Justice Department alleges that Maduro’s government effectively facilitated cocaine shipments into the United States in collaboration with violent cartels such as the FARC, the Sinaloa cartel, and others — accusations Maduro has denied.  

U.S. Government Position

President Donald Trump personally confirmed the operation and said that the United States would “run” Venezuela temporarily to manage a transition of power, citing both national security and economic interests, particularly Venezuela’s vast oil resources.  

Trump described the mission as one of the most extraordinary uses of American military force since World War II, asserting that it was necessary to bring Maduro to justice and stabilize the region.  

International and Legal Controversy

The capture has ignited a fierce international debate about legality and sovereignty. Many legal scholars and governments argue that military abduction of a sitting head of state on foreign soil without United Nations authorization violates international law.  

Venezuela’s interim government — endorsed by Caracas opposition figures and recognized by some foreign governments — has demanded proof that Maduro is alive and called the U.S. actions an illegal kidnapping. 

International leaders have been sharply divided: some Western allies offer cautious support for holding Maduro accountable, while others condemn the operation as dangerous precedent that undermines international norms.  

Reactions in Venezuela and Beyond

In Venezuela, the situation remains volatile. While some opposition groups view the U.S. action as an opportunity for political change, many citizens and officials decry it as imperialist aggression. Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, named interim president under Venezuela’s constitution, has rejected U.S. claims and asserted Maduro’s legitimacy.  

Across the region, governments and international bodies, including the United Nations, have called emergency meetings to address the implications of the U.S. strike and the capture of a sovereign leader.  

Historical Significance

The seizure and transfer of Nicolás Maduro to U.S. soil for prosecution is among the most dramatic interventions by the United States in Latin America in decades — drawing historical comparisons to the 1989 capture of Panamanian leader Manuel Noriega.  

Whether this marks a turning point in U.S. foreign policy or deepens regional instability will unfold in the coming weeks, as legal proceedings begin and the world watches how Venezuela’s leadership vacuum is managed.  

Attached is a news article regarding maduro brought in to New York after being seized by US in Venezuela 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5yqygxe41pt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Saturday, 3 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 Mews viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Money Mayweather” in Trouble? Inside the Boxing Icon’s Mounting Financial and Legal Woes

Despite a legendary undefeated boxing career and a reputation for living an extravagant lifestyle, Floyd Mayweather Jr. — arguably the richest boxer of all time — now finds himself at the center of intense scrutiny over his post-boxing finances. Recent reports reveal a tangled web of debts, lawsuits, foreclosures, and legal battles that paint a far more complicated picture than the flashy wealth he regularly broadcasts on social media.  

A Lifestyle Supported by Debt

Since retiring from professional fighting in 2017 with a perfect 50-0 record, Mayweather has cultivated an image of opulence — private jets, luxury cars, mansions and high-end real estate investments. But public records and investigative reporting suggest trouble beneath the surface: over the past two years, he has taken on millions in loans secured against his properties and assets, including his private jet and Las Vegas strip club, raising alarms about his actual liquidity.  

In early 2024, Mayweather reportedly borrowed $54 million at nearly 9% interest from a specialty lender — a deal that used 14 properties, a strip club, and aircraft as collateral, meaning financial setbacks could jeopardize multiple assets simultaneously.  

Foreclosures and Unpaid Taxes

Questions about Mayweather’s financial management are compounded by several public financial issues:

A commercial property he bought in Las Vegas was foreclosed and sold at auction.   

Two condominiums were temporarily seized over unpaid property taxes.  

His strip club is reportedly at risk of seizure over a $52,000 tax bill.  

A small lien was placed on his mansion for unpaid trash fees.  

While these sums may appear modest compared with a billionaire’s worth, the sheer number of liens and defaults has fueled speculation about deeper liquidity problems.  

Lawsuits Allege Unpaid Bills and Debts

Mayweather’s business dealings have also landed him in a series of lawsuits:

His aviation company was sued for over $136,000 in unpaid jet fuel and services.  

A Las Vegas car dealership sued him over $2.25 million in luxury vehicles he allegedly never paid for, sparking defamation and counter-suits.  

Reports link him to claims for unpaid bills for luxury items such as watches and jewelry.  

In response, Mayweather has filed his own lawsuits in some disputes — for example, against the car dealer for allegedly failing to provide proper documentation on a vehicle.  

Denials and Defamation Claims

Unsurprisingly, Mayweather and his legal team have denied that he is bankrupt or insolvent. He is currently suing Business Insider and a journalist for $100 million, claiming defamatory reporting about his finances and real estate dealings. His representatives contend many of these financial moves, such as borrowing against appreciated assets, are standard practice for wealthy individuals and not signs of distress.  

In public statements, Mayweather has also dismissed bankruptcy rumors, insisting that he remains financially secure and that negative reporting is inaccurate or racially motivated.  

Net Worth vs. Liquidity: What’s Really Going On?

Experts caution that wealth tied up in illiquid assets — like real estate — can create the appearance of financial strain even if an individual’s net worth remains high. Mayweather reportedly earned hundreds of millions during his boxing career and has continued to generate income from exhibition fights, endorsements, and business ventures.  

However, creditors and legal filings suggest that cash flow issues, high leverage, and aggressive investment strategies may have put pressure on his finances, leading to the very real risk of asset seizures or legal judgments if debts aren’t resolved.  

What’s Next for Mayweather?

With his financial reputation under intense scrutiny and multiple legal fronts open, many are watching to see whether Mayweather will:

continue to fight in high-profile exhibition bouts to generate income,

settle or win the lawsuits against him, or

restructure his real estate and business interests to stabilize his financial position.

For now, the debate over whether Mayweather is truly close to bankruptcy — or simply navigating a complex financial landscape behind the scenes — continues.

Attached is a News article regarding Floyd mayweather financial debt as he is on the verge of being bankrupt 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/floyd-mayweather-boxing-latest-news-35211588.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News

Dear 222 Mews viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Norfolk Couple Ordered to Repay £3 Million Over Ed Sheeran Ticket Touting Fraud A Norfolk co...