AD

Sunday, 11 January 2026

Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Ghost of the Thames Estuary: The SS Richard Montgomery

In the shallow waters of the Thames Estuary, not far from Sheerness in Kent, lies one of Britain’s most enduring wartime mysteries — the wreck of the American Liberty ship SS Richard Montgomery. More than 80 years after it sank, this rusting hulk remains a hazard, a historical relic and a chilling reminder of the fury of global conflict.  

A Liberty Ship Turned Catastrophe

Built in Jacksonville, Florida in 1943, the SS Richard Montgomery was one of the thousands of “Liberty ships” — mass-produced cargo vessels designed to carry war supplies across the Atlantic during World War II. In August 1944, she departed the USA laden with around 7,000 tonnes of munitions — bombs, shells and explosives destined for the front lines in Europe.  

Upon arriving in the Thames Estuary on 20 August 1944, the ship was ordered to anchor in the Great Nore Anchorage, off Sheerness, while waiting to join a convoy bound for France. But tragedy struck almost immediately: in strong winds and shallow waters, the Montgomery’s anchor dragged, and the ship drifted onto a sandbank, where it grounded amidships and suffered severe hull damage.  

A Salvage Effort That Failed

Efforts to unload the explosive cargo began at once. Salvage crews worked amid dangerous conditions to remove as much ordnance as possible, but before all the bombs could be taken off, a crack appeared in the hull and the forward end of the ship began to flood. By 25 September 1944, the salvage operation was abandoned as the vessel sank completely.  

Today, the wreck rests across the tide just 1.5 miles from Sheerness and about 5 miles from Southend-on-Sea, in roughly 15 m of water. The ship’s three masts still protrude above the surface, a stark marker of its dangerous cargo.  

The Explosives That Never Left

Although thousands of tonnes of explosives were removed during the initial salvage, an estimated around 1,400 tonnes of high explosives remain on board — trapped in the forward holds of the sunken wreck. These include bombs of various sizes and types that were destined for battle in Europe.  

The wreck was designated a protected dangerous site under the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973, the first wreck in UK waters to receive this status due to its explosive cargo, and an exclusion zone marked by buoys surrounds it. Regular survey work assesses the condition of what remains.  

A “Doomsday Shipwreck”

Over the decades, the SS Richard Montgomery has been nicknamed the “Doomsday wreck.” Experts have long debated the danger posed by the remaining explosives. Some suggest that if the ordnance were to detonate, the explosion could throw a column of water and debris nearly 3,000 m into the air, generate a 5 m high wave and damage nearby infrastructure — though more recent assessments describe such scenarios as low to moderate risk.  

Despite periodic media warnings that the wreck is a “ticking time bomb,” authorities stress that the likelihood of a catastrophic explosion is remote. Salvaging the remaining explosives is complicated and dangerous: the ageing structure has deteriorated over decades, and disturbing it might itself trigger the very disaster everyone seeks to avoid.  

Monitoring and Management

Today, the wreck is monitored by the UK’s Maritime and Coastguard Agency and other agencies, and surveys are carried out to track changes in the hull and seabed. There have been proposals — including removing the masts — to reduce hazards, but comprehensive removal of the explosives remains off the table because of the risks involved.  

The Montgomery sits in silence, a historical artifact and dangerous relic of the Second World War. Visible at low tide and constantly surveyed, it is a poignant reminder of the war’s scale, the chaos of conflict logistics, and the enduring legacy such wrecks leave on both the landscape and the public imagination.  

Attached is a news article regarding shipwreck SS Richard Montgomery that sank in 1944 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-61370382.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Man Arrested After Police Dog Attack During Migrant Operation

A man has been arrested after being attacked by a police dog during a law-enforcement operation involving suspected migrants, prompting renewed debate over the use of police animals in crowd control and border enforcement.

The incident occurred during an early-morning police operation when officers attempted to detain a group of individuals believed to have entered the area unlawfully. According to authorities, the man attempted to flee the scene and ignored repeated commands to stop. A police dog was then deployed to assist officers in making the arrest.

Witnesses reported chaotic scenes as the dog seized the man, who was brought to the ground before being restrained by officers. Paramedics were later called to treat bite injuries, which police said were non-life-threatening. The man was taken into custody and remains under investigation for immigration-related offences and resisting arrest.

Police defended the use of the dog, stating that it was deployed in accordance with operational guidelines and only after other methods to detain the suspect failed. A spokesperson said the dog was used “to prevent further escape and to ensure the safety of officers and members of the public.”

However, the incident has sparked criticism from migrant rights groups, who argue that the use of police dogs against vulnerable individuals is excessive and potentially traumatic. Campaigners have called for greater oversight and clearer rules on the deployment of dogs during immigration enforcement, particularly where individuals may be unarmed and frightened.

Legal experts note that police dogs are classed as a use of force and must meet strict standards of necessity and proportionality. Any injuries caused are subject to internal review and, in some cases, independent investigation.

The case remains ongoing, and police have confirmed that a routine review of the dog’s deployment is underway. Further details are expected to be released as inquiries continue.

Attached is a news article regarding a migrant man attack by a police dog 

https://www.facebook.com/Canada.Israel.Friendship/posts/-united-kingdompolice-dog-1violent-arrest-resisting-third-world-migrant-0video-c/1282112677294808/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Anatomy: The Film That Dissects Donald Trump

The film Anatomy presents itself not as a conventional biopic, but as a clinical examination of Donald Trump — the man, the myth, and the machinery that carried him from property tycoon to one of the most polarising figures in modern history. Rather than following a neat timeline of events, the movie peels back layers of power, ego and spectacle, offering viewers an unsettling portrait of how personality can reshape politics, media and public truth.

At its core, Anatomy treats Trump less as a hero or villain and more as a case study. The film explores how his worldview was forged in the ruthless world of New York real estate, where dominance, branding and aggression were not just tools but necessities. Early scenes focus on ambition and performance — the idea that success is not simply achieved, but loudly announced until it becomes unquestionable fact.

What sets Anatomy apart is its emphasis on psychology over policy. The film repeatedly returns to the notion that Trump’s power lies in instinct rather than strategy. His relationship with the media is portrayed as symbiotic and combative: outrage fuels attention, attention fuels relevance, and relevance becomes authority. Interviews, archival footage and dramatized sequences blur together, reinforcing the film’s argument that reality itself became flexible in Trump’s orbit.

The movie also examines loyalty and fear as currencies of influence. Advisors, allies and opponents are shown not as independent actors, but as figures caught in a gravitational field where proximity to power offers reward — and exile brings punishment. In this sense, Anatomy is less about one individual and more about the environment that allowed such a figure to thrive.

Visually, the film is stark and controlled. Cold lighting, sharp edits and recurring motifs of mirrors and reflections underline its central question: where does the performance end and the person begin? The soundtrack remains restrained, refusing to dramatise moments that history has already turned into spectacle.

Crucially, Anatomy does not ask the audience to like or loathe Trump — it asks them to understand him. That approach may frustrate viewers seeking condemnation or praise, but it is also the film’s greatest strength. By resisting easy judgement, it exposes uncomfortable truths about celebrity politics, voter anger, and the modern hunger for strongmen who promise simple answers to complex problems.

In the end, Anatomy is not just a film about Donald Trump. It is a mirror held up to the systems that elevated him — the media ecosystem, the political institutions, and a public increasingly drawn to confrontation over consensus. Whether viewers see the film as a warning, an explanation, or a diagnosis of a deeper cultural illness, one thing is clear: Anatomy leaves no doubt that Trump was not an accident of history, but a product of it.

Attached is a news article regarding a documentary on Donald Trump 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2przgvdyeo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Marks & Spencer: The Loss of a British Institution and the Death of Quality

Marks & Spencer — once the unchallenged emblem of British retail excellence and quality — is now struggling under the weight of change, competition and strategic missteps. For generations, M&S was synonymous with reliability: sturdy clothes that lasted more than a season and food that stood above the everyday. Today, critics argue that this soul has been diluted — and in many ways lost altogether.

From British Quality to Modern Struggles

For more than a century, Marks & Spencer built its reputation on an unwavering commitment to quality. Its emphasis on fresh food standards and clothing durability helped make it a cornerstone of UK shopping culture. But that reputation began to fade as the retail landscape shifted. Younger, faster rivals and the explosion of online retail changed customer expectations faster than M&S could adapt.  

In recent years, this transformation has been painfully visible. Clothing and homeware sales have lagged behind expectations, even as the food business remained relatively strong. Analysts have noted continued weakness in non-food categories, with fashion and homeware struggling to resonate with today’s consumers.  

The Cyberattack That Exposed Deeper Fault Lines

In April 2025, Marks & Spencer suffered a significant cyberattack that took its online operations offline for more than six weeks — during a critical selling period. The breach interrupted online orders, disrupted supply systems and led to stock shortages on the ground. The incident didn’t just cost millions; it exposed deeper vulnerabilities in M&S’s digital infrastructure and highlighted years of underinvestment in modern retail systems.  

The cyberattack wasn’t just a technical failure — it symbolised a brand struggling to keep pace with the expectations of the digital age. Many customers reported empty shelves and long waits for restocking, undermining confidence in a store once known for consistent availability and quality service.  

Quality Questions: A Perception Problem Becomes Reality

Customer sentiment has also shifted. Once renowned for long-lasting clothing and wardrobe staples, M&S’s garments are increasingly seen as average rather than exceptional. Online forums and community discussions reflect a noticeable frustration with falling textile quality, paradoxically alongside rising prices — a combination that chips away at loyalty.  

This perception issue isn’t new. For years, M&S has struggled to balance price, quality and trend relevance. Its position in the middle of the market — too expensive to compete with discounters, yet not fashionable enough to rival fast fashion — has eroded the clear identity it once enjoyed.  

High Streets in Retreat

Beyond product quality, the physical presence of M&S stores is shrinking. Recent announcements confirm closures of longstanding outlets on traditional UK high streets — a development many see as symbolic of the broader decline of bricks-and-mortar retail.  

While other parts of the business, like food halls, still draw customers, the retreat on fashion and other categories highlights a company grappling with conflicting identities: supermarket, department store and legacy brand all at once.

Has M&S Lost Its Soul

At the heart of the debate is a deeper, almost emotional question: has Marks & Spencer lost its soul

For many, “British quality” meant more than reliable products — it stood for trust, consistency, and a connection to everyday life across generations. When that standard began to slip, customers didn’t just notice the price tag or fabric strength — they felt a loss of heritage. That sentiment is hard to quantify but easy to recognise in the slow erosion of loyalty many once took for granted.

A Path Forward — Or a Retreat

M&S leadership insists that transformation plans — from rebuilding online capabilities to refocusing product portfolios — will revive the brand. But success is not guaranteed. Restoring confidence requires more than strategic foibles; it demands a re-anchoring in quality that customers can feel and trust.

In the end, the story of Marks & Spencer serves as a cautionary tale about what happens when heritage brands fail to evolve in ways that honour their origins. The “death” of British quality may be an overstatement — but unless M&S rediscovers the principles that made it iconic, it risks becoming a relic rather than a revival success.

Attached is a news article regarding Marks & Spencer the death of British quality 

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/08/ms-christmas-food-sales-soar-but-clothing-suffers-from-cyber-attack-fallout

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Saturday, 10 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Escalates Trade Fight With New Tariffs on French Wine and Imports

In the latest chapter of an intensifying global trade war, U.S. President Donald Trump has significantly increased tariffs on French wine and a range of European imports, setting off alarm bells among producers, exporters and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic.

The dispute stems from a broader clash over trade policy that has seen the U.S. impose steep duties on foreign metals and other goods — and trading partners respond in kind. What began as industry-specific measures has now spilled over into culturally iconic products such as French wine, Champagne and spirits.  

From Whiskey to Wine: How the Dispute Escalated

The current tensions trace back to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminium imports, which triggered retaliatory levies from the European Union. Brussels responded with tariffs worth roughly €26 billion targeting key American exports — including bourbon whiskey — adding a 50 % tariff on U.S. whiskey in a bid to pressure Washington.  

In retaliation, President Trump threatened and then implemented steep tariffs on wine, champagne, and other alcoholic beverages imported from France and the wider EU, initially floating a 200 % tariff on these products if the EU did not reverse its planned measures.  

The final tariff schedule landed at around 20 – 30 % on French wines and spirits, though Trump’s rhetoric made clear he was prepared to go much further in escalating the trade fight.  

What’s Being Taxed — And How It Impacts Markets

Under the new U.S. tariff regime:

French wine and spirits — including Bordeaux, Burgundy and Champagne — face additional duties, raising import costs.  

Other European wine exports, from Italy and Spain, are also affected as part of a broader 15 % tariff on EU goods under an ongoing trade agreement framework.  

Dairy products such as French cheese are also feeling the impact, with industry representatives warning of potential losses in the U.S. market.  

Economists and industry stakeholders note that tariffs don’t just add a fixed cost — they compound through the supply chain. By the time a tariff is applied at the border, then marked up by importers, wholesalers, and retailers, a bottle of wine can cost up to 30 % more on U.S. shelves than before the duties took effect.  

French Producers Warn of Serious Consequences

For France — whose wine and spirits are among its major export industries — the tariffs represent more than political brinkmanship. The United States is one of the largest export markets for French wine, with billions of euros in annual trade at stake.  

Industry associations have warned that:

Exports could fall sharply, with estimates of up to €800 million lost due to reduced competitiveness in the U.S. market.  

Jobs — particularly in rural areas such as Cognac and Burgundy — could be threatened by diminished sales.  

Restaurants, importers, and distributors in the U.S. may also struggle with higher prices driving away consumers.  

French food producers, including cheese makers and dairy exporters, are equally concerned, warning that tariffs pushing prices higher in an already inflationary environment could sharply reduce demand.  

U.S. Reactions and Domestic Effects

Supporters of the tariffs argue they are necessary to push for fairer trade practices and protect American industries they say have been disadvantaged by foreign tariffs. Trump himself has described the levies as a way to bring jobs and production back to the U.S. and to correct what he calls “unfair trade” relationships.  

However, some American businesses are uneasy. Importers and retailers say higher tariffs will:

Increase prices for U.S. consumers, especially in markets such as wine bars and restaurants heavily reliant on European imports.  

Disrupt traditional supply chains, affecting related domestic industries too — for instance, U.S. wineries that use European barrels or corks.  

Broader Diplomatic Consequences

Beyond economics, the dispute has political implications. French officials have publicly condemned the tariffs, framing them as hostile and detrimental to long-standing transatlantic relations. Paris has also called for continued negotiations with the EU to protect key sectors and find a negotiated solution.  

Ongoing talks about trade exemptions and tariff carve-outs — particularly for beloved French products like champagne — reflect continuing diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the situation.  

What Comes Next?

As trade negotiations continue, both sides face pressure from domestic industries and international partners to reach a resolution that avoids further escalation.

Whether the current tariffs will remain, be expanded, or ultimately rolled back hinges on complex negotiations between Washington, Brussels, and Paris — and on how swiftly both sides can bridge their differences over steel, aluminum, whiskey, wine, and beyond.

One thing is clear: beloved French products such as wine and Champagne are no longer immune from the geopolitical tensions shaping global trade in the 2020s.

Attached is a News article regarding trump increasing wines and other products from France 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c984pnedd6do.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Friday, 9 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

U.S. Oil Production Boom — What’s Happening

In recent years the United States has surged to the top of global oil producers — driven by hydraulic fracturing (fracking), shale drilling, and advanced extraction technologies that have greatly increased output. According to the International Energy Agency, the U.S. has been the largest contributor to global supply growth, adding millions of barrels per day to worldwide markets as it overtook many traditional producers.  

Today, U.S. production is a defining force in energy markets:

The U.S. is producing at record levels compared with past decades.

It has become a net exporter of oil and petroleum products.

Domestic shale output gives Washington leverage in foreign policy and market pricing.  

This abundance is reshaping how the U.S. interacts with other oil-rich countries — including Venezuela, home to the largest proven oil reserves in the world.  

How the Oil “Surplus” Benefits the United States

1. Energy Security & Lower Consumer Prices

Because the U.S. produces so much oil domestically, it’s less dependent on volatile regions like the Middle East. More domestic barrels can help moderate gasoline and heating costs for American drivers and businesses — a key political and economic leverage point.  

2. Economic Growth & Jobs

The oil and gas sector directly supports hundreds of thousands of American jobs — from drilling and transportation to refinery work and services. High production levels also:

Stimulate investment in infrastructure.

Support related sectors like petrochemicals and export logistics.

Expand U.S. trade balance by exporting surplus crude and refined products.

3. Global Market Leverage

With such abundant output, the U.S. can influence global prices. A larger supply base makes it harder for OPEC and Russia to dictate prices and quotas, giving U.S. policymakers and companies stronger negotiating power.  

The Venezuela Connection: Opportunity & Complexity

Recent political developments — including U.S. moves in Venezuela — have thrust Venezuelan oil back into the spotlight.

U.S. Access to Huge Reserves

Venezuela boasts over 300 billion barrels of proven reserves, far more than Saudi Arabia. While actual production is currently low, reviving it could add significantly to global supply.  

The U.S. — or U.S. companies — gaining access to that supply could:

Provide additional barrels to the U.S. market.

Offer heavy crude that U.S. Gulf Coast refineries are designed to process.  

Phillips 66, Valero Energy, and others could benefit because they can refine heavier crude grades like those Venezuela produces.  

Lower Prices But Some Risks

Increased Venezuelan supply, combined with existing U.S. output, could further suppress global oil prices — potentially to levels under $60 or even around $50 per barrel according to some forecasts. Lower prices help consumers but can stress small U.S. producers, reduce investment, and limit profits.  

Benefits to U.S. Oil Companies

Major American energy firms stand to gain in multiple ways:

 1. Higher Refining Margins

U.S. refiners can secure heavier crude at potentially lower cost, boosting profit margins on gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel production.  

2. Strategic Assets & Growth Potential

Companies like Chevron — already operating in Venezuela under special licenses — see opportunities to expand output quickly and strengthen their long-term positions.  

ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips are also benefiting via investment flows and potential compensation claims linked to past Venezuelan nationalisations.  

3. Stock Market Gains

Market reactions show energy stocks rising on prospects of expanded reserves and production opportunities, which can reward shareholders and attract investment.  

What About Venezuela

The picture for Venezuela is more complicated:

Potential revival of its oil industry could bring much-needed foreign capital, technology, and jobs to a country whose production collapsed due to underinvestment and sanctions.  

Huge infrastructure costs and political instability mean any turnaround will take years and tens of billions of dollars in investment.  

The infusion of capital and expertise from U.S. firms might help restore output — but it also raises issues around sovereignty, local benefit, and long-term governance.

Final Takeaway

The U.S.’s large oil production capacity and potential access to Venezuela’s massive reserves represent a shift in global energy dynamics. For the United States, this means:

Greater energy security and political leverage.

Consumer cost relief if prices stay moderate.

Profits and growth for American oil companies.

For Venezuela, unlocking its oil riches could fuel economic recovery — albeit slowly and with significant investment needs.

And for major oil corporations, increased production and refining opportunities can translate into market advantage, higher earnings, and strengthened global presence.

But while oil abundance has clear economic perks, it also brings challenges — including sustainability concerns, market oversupply risks, and geopolitical tensions that will shape the future of energy markets for years to come.

Attached is a news article regarding America oil product development with Venezuela 

https://www.barrons.com/articles/trump-chevron-exxon-conoco-stock-venezuela-oil-a261c970?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Manchester in the 1850s: Britain’s Industrial Workshop

By the 1850s, Manchester had become the beating heart of Britain’s Industrial Revolution, earning its global reputation as the world’s first industrial city and the undisputed “workshop of the world.” What had once been a modest market town was transformed into a sprawling urban powerhouse driven by steam, cotton, and relentless human labour.

The Rise of the Cotton Empire

Manchester’s dominance rested on cotton. The city processed vast quantities of raw cotton imported from the American South, India, and Egypt. Towering brick mills lined the River Irwell and its canals, their chimneys pumping smoke into the sky day and night. Steam-powered machinery allowed factories to operate at unprecedented speed, producing cheap textiles that flooded global markets.

By mid-century, Manchester and the surrounding Lancashire towns were responsible for more than half of the world’s cotton cloth production. Merchants grew wealthy, and the city became a hub of global trade, with cotton goods shipped across the British Empire and beyond.

Life Inside the Workshops

For workers, Manchester’s workshops were harsh and unforgiving. Men, women, and children laboured long hours—often 12 to 14 hours a day—amid deafening machinery, poor ventilation, and constant danger. Accidents were common, and illness spread quickly in overcrowded factory spaces.

Child labour remained widespread despite growing public concern. Many children worked from a young age, valued for their small size and low wages. While the Factory Acts introduced limits on working hours, enforcement was uneven, and exploitation persisted.

Urban Growth and Poverty

The city’s population exploded as rural families migrated in search of work. By the 1850s, Manchester was densely packed with back-to-back housing and slums. Areas such as Ancoats and Angel Meadow became symbols of industrial poverty, where families lived in damp, cramped conditions with limited access to clean water or sanitation.

Choleratyphoid, and tuberculosis were common. Life expectancy for working-class residents was shockingly low, and social reformers increasingly raised alarms about the human cost of industrial progress.

Wealth, Power, and Reform

While workers struggled, Manchester’s industrial elite flourished. Grand warehouses, civic buildings, and banks reshaped the city centre, reflecting the wealth generated by manufacturing. The Free Trade Hall, completed in the 1850s, stood as a symbol of Manchester’s political influence and its role in campaigns such as the Anti–Corn Law League.

The city also became a centre of radical thought. Trade unionsChartists, and social reformers challenged poor working conditions and political exclusion, helping to lay the foundations for later labour rights.

A City That Changed Britain

Manchester in the 1850s embodied both the promise and the brutality of industrialisation. It showcased Britain’s technological power and global reach, while exposing deep social inequalities that demanded reform. As the nation’s industrial workshop, Manchester shaped modern urban life—its factories, struggles, and innovations leaving a lasting imprint on Britain and the wider world.

Attached is a news article regarding Manchester in the 1850s 

https://www.playingpasts.co.uk/articles/general/manchesters-miller-street-public-baths-and-wash-house-1846-1850/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Colombia’s Ongoing Battle to Regain Control from Drug Cartels

For decades, Colombia has been synonymous with the global cocaine trade, a legacy shaped by powerful drug cartels that once rivalled the state itself. While the era of notorious kingpins such as Pablo Escobar has passed, Colombia’s struggle to assert full control over drug trafficking networks remains far from over.

In the late 20th century, cartels like MedellĂ­n and Cali exercised immense influence, corrupting institutions, funding insurgencies and unleashing waves of violence that destabilised the country. In response, the Colombian government—backed heavily by the United States—launched aggressive military and law enforcement campaigns aimed at dismantling cartel leadership and weakening their operational capacity.

These efforts achieved notable successes. High-profile arrests and extraditions reduced the power of centralised cartels, while improved intelligence-sharing and police reform strengthened state authority. Homicide rates fell sharply from their peak in the 1990s, and Colombia regained a degree of international confidence as security conditions improved.

However, the drug trade did not disappear—it adapted. Large cartels fragmented into smaller, more agile criminal groups that are harder to track and dismantle. These organisations now operate across borders, collaborating with networks in Mexico, Central America and Europe. Coca cultivation has persisted, driven by poverty in rural areas and sustained global demand for cocaine.

More recently, Colombia’s approach has shifted under President Gustavo Petro, who has argued that decades of militarised “war on drugs” policies have failed to address the root causes of the problem. His government has placed greater emphasis on rural development, crop substitution and negotiations with armed groups involved in drug trafficking. The aim is to reduce violence while offering farmers economic alternatives to coca cultivation.

Critics warn that reduced military pressure risks emboldening criminal groups, some of which have expanded their territorial control in remote regions. Armed organisations linked to drug trafficking continue to threaten community leaders, environmental activists and state officials, undermining governance in areas where the state presence remains weak.

Colombia’s experience highlights the complexity of controlling drug cartels in a globalised market. While the government has succeeded in preventing any single cartel from dominating the country as they once did, complete control remains elusive. The future of Colombia’s drug policy will likely depend on striking a balance between security enforcement, social investment and international cooperation.

As long as global demand for cocaine remains strong, Colombia’s battle against drug cartels will continue—less visible than in the past, but no less challenging.

Attached is a news article regarding Colombia control on the drug cartels 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c98py70npj9o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Thursday, 8 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Football Legend Kevin Keegan Diagnosed with Cancer as Family Requests Privacy

Kevin Keegan, one of England’s most celebrated footballers and managers, has been diagnosed with cancer at the age of 74, his family and former club Newcastle United confirmed this week.  

The former England international was recently admitted to hospital after experiencing ongoing abdominal symptoms. Following medical evaluations and tests, doctors revealed that Keegan has cancer, and he is now set to begin treatment. His family expressed gratitude to the medical team for their care and asked for privacy during this difficult period.  

A Storied Career on and off the Pitch

Keegan’s influence on English and European football is immense. He began his professional career at Scunthorpe United before earning a high-profile move to Liverpool in 1971. At Liverpool he won multiple honours — including three English First Division titles, the FA Cup, two UEFA Cups and a European Cup — and became a beloved figure among supporters.  

In 1977 Keegan moved to Hamburger SV in Germany, where he helped the club to a Bundesliga title and was twice named European Footballer of the Year, winning the Ballon d’Or in 1978 and 1979. After successful spells with Southampton and Newcastle United, he retired from playing in 1984.  

For England, Keegan was capped 63 times, scored 21 goals and captained the national team, including at the 1982 FIFA World Cup. His leadership and flair on the ball made him one of the stand-out British talents of his generation.  

Transition to Management

Following his playing career, Keegan moved into management — most prominently with Newcastle United. In his first managerial spell, he famously guided the club into the Premier League and came within touching distance of the title in the 1995–96 season with the much-admired “Entertainers” side.  

He also took charge of clubs including Fulham and Manchester City, and briefly managed the England national team from 1999 to 2000 before resigning after a challenging European Championship campaign.  

Outpouring of Support

News of Keegan’s diagnosis has sparked widespread support across the football world. Newcastle United, where he enjoyed both iconic playing and managerial roles, released a message wishing him strength and a full recovery, affectionately referring to him as “King Kev.” Liverpool FC and other clubs linked with his career have likewise paid tribute and sent their best wishes.  

Fans have taken to social media to express their admiration and hope for Keegan’s recovery, reflecting the deep connection many feel with one of the game’s enduring figures.  

Privacy and Hope

While details about the specific type and stage of the cancer have not been disclosed, Keegan will now focus on treatment with the support of his family. They have made clear that they are asking for privacy as he undergoes this difficult journey.  

Kevin Keegan’s contributions to football — both as a dynamic forward and a charismatic leader — have left an indelible mark on the sport. Fans around the world will be hoping for positive news in the months ahead.

Attached is a News article regarding Kevin keegan diagnosed with cancer 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj9r1pd18e3o

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Police Step Up Efforts to Protect Children as Threats Grow

Police forces across the UK are significantly strengthening their efforts to protect children, responding to growing concerns over online exploitation, youth violence, grooming, and criminal gangs targeting the vulnerable.

Senior officers say safeguarding children has become a top priority, with specialist units expanded and frontline officers receiving enhanced training to recognise early signs of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Forces are also working more closely with schools, social services, and health professionals to intervene before harm occurs.

One of the major focuses is tackling online threats. With children spending more time on social media and gaming platforms, police cybercrime units are increasing patrols of digital spaces where grooming and exploitation can take place. Officers are using advanced technology to identify predators, disrupt networks, and rescue children from ongoing abuse.

Knife crime and youth violence have also driven tougher action. Police are boosting high-visibility patrols around schools, transport hubs, and known hotspots, particularly during peak hours. Stop-and-search powers are being used more strategically, while community officers are engaging directly with young people to divert them away from crime and offer support instead of punishment where possible.

County lines drug networks remain a serious threat, with criminal gangs exploiting children to transport drugs and money across the country. Police say thousands of children have already been safeguarded through joint operations that focus on arresting gang leaders while treating exploited youths as victims rather than offenders.

Education and prevention are central to the strategy. Officers are delivering workshops in schools on topics including online safety, consent, knife crime, and recognising coercion. Parents are also being encouraged to report concerns early, with police stressing that intervention works best before situations escalate.

Child protection charities have welcomed the increased focus but warn that policing alone cannot solve the problem. They are calling for sustained funding, youth services, and mental health support to ensure long-term safety.

Police leaders insist the message is clear: protecting children is a shared responsibility, but law enforcement will continue to adapt, invest, and act decisively to keep young people safe in an increasingly complex world.

Attached is a news article regarding the police stepping up child protection in the uk 

https://news.sky.com/story/how-police-are-changing-tactics-to-protect-vulnerable-children-13490265

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Pickup Truck Used in Brazen Robbery at Louis Vuitton Store A Louis Vuitton store was targete...