Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Duane “Keffe D” Davis Found Guilty of Tupac Shakur’s Murder After Nearly 30 Years

LAS VEGAS — Nearly three decades after the murder of hip-hop legend Tupac Shakur, a Las Vegas jury has found Duane “Keffe D” Davis guilty of first-degree murder with a deadly weapon, bringing a major development to one of the most famous unsolved cases in music history.

Davis, 63, was convicted on Monday, August 31, 2026, after jurors deliberated for approximately three hours. Prosecutors accused him of organising the September 7, 1996, drive-by shooting that ultimately claimed Tupac’s life.

Tupac’s final night

Tupac Shakur was just 25 years old when he was shot while travelling in a BMW driven by Death Row Records co-founder Marion “Suge” Knight in Las Vegas.

A white Cadillac pulled alongside the vehicle at a red light and gunfire erupted. Tupac was struck several times and died six days later from his injuries. Knight survived the attack. 

The shooting followed an earlier confrontation at the MGM Grand involving Tupac’s associates and Orlando “Baby Lane” Anderson, Davis’ nephew. Prosecutors argued that the confrontation became the motive for a retaliatory attack against Tupac and those associated with Death Row Records.

Davis did not pull the trigger

One of the most important aspects of the case is that prosecutors did not allege Davis personally fired the fatal shots.

Instead, prosecutors argued that Davis played a leadership role in organising the attack, providing the weapon and directing the men involved. Under Nevada law, a person who helps organise or directs a murder can be held criminally responsible even if they are not the person who pulls the trigger. 

The prosecution relied heavily on statements Davis had made over the years, including interviews and material connected with his 2019 memoir, Compton Street Legend. Prosecutors argued that Davis had repeatedly described his involvement in the events surrounding Tupac’s killing. 

Defence challenged Davis’ own statements

Davis pleaded not guilty and his defence challenged the prosecution’s interpretation of his previous statements.

His lawyers argued that Davis had exaggerated or fabricated parts of his story, including material published for financial gain, and questioned whether the prosecution had sufficient physical evidence connecting him directly to the shooting.

Despite the defence arguments, the jury ultimately accepted the prosecution’s case and returned a unanimous guilty verdict.

A case that changed hip-hop history

Tupac Shakur’s murder became one of the biggest mysteries in popular music. For almost 30 years, theories surrounding who was responsible continued to circulate among fans, investigators and the wider hip-hop community.

Davis’ conviction represents the first conviction in connection with Tupac’s killing, closing a major chapter in a case that remained unresolved for decades. 

Davis was arrested in 2023 after years of public statements about the killing. The prosecution’s case ultimately centred on his own words and his alleged role in organising the attack. 

What happens next?

Davis now faces the possibility of life imprisonment, with sentencing still to come. He has indicated that he intends to appeal the conviction. 

For Tupac’s family, friends and millions of fans around the world, the guilty verdict represents a dramatic moment in a case that has remained part of hip-hop history since that September night in Las Vegas.

Almost 30 years after Tupac Shakur’s death, the question of criminal responsibility has finally reached a courtroom verdict.

Attached is a news article regarding the murderer of Tupac found guilty 

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2026/aug/31/tupac-shakur-killing-duane-keith-davis

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Luton Faces Growing Concern Over High Number of Stray Cats

Luton, Bedfordshire — Concerns are growing over the number of stray and abandoned cats being seen across Luton, with animal-welfare organisations facing continued pressure to care for unwanted cats and kittens.

Local reports have highlighted the scale of the problem, with a charity previously warning that Luton had significantly higher numbers of stray cats than some other areas. However, there is no reliable current figure establishing exactly how many stray cats are living on the streets of Luton.

The issue is being tackled by local animal-welfare groups. ANIMALS AT RISK SHELTER is based in Luton, while Cats Protection’s Luton, Dunstable & District branch provides support for cats and kittens across the area, including assistance with neutering, lost and found cats and finding permanent homes. 

One of the major concerns is uncontrolled breeding. Cats that are not neutered can produce multiple litters, meaning a small number of unowned cats can quickly develop into a much larger population. Kittens born outside homes can also face illness, injuries, starvation and exposure to traffic.

Another challenge is distinguishing between a genuinely stray cat and a pet that is allowed to roam. Some cats regularly seen outdoors may have owners who are unaware that their animals are being mistaken for strays.

Local rescue organisations therefore stress the importance of checking whether a cat is owned before assuming it has been abandoned. Microchipping, neutering and responsible ownership can all play an important role in reducing the number of cats entering the stray population.

The charity Stray Cat Rescue also works with unwanted and stray cats in the wider Bedfordshire area. Meanwhile, Feline Cat Rescue is registered as a charity that takes in unwanted, abandoned and stray cats and kittens in Luton. 

For Luton, the growing concern is not simply about the number of cats being seen on the streets. It is about whether local rescue organisations have enough volunteers, funding, foster homes and veterinary resources to deal with the animals needing help.

Animal welfare campaigners say preventing unwanted litters is one of the most effective ways to tackle the problem in the long term. Without greater emphasis on neutering, microchipping, responsible ownership and rehoming, the number of stray and abandoned cats could continue to place pressure on local rescue services.

The situation highlights a wider issue facing communities across Britain: when unwanted animals are left without proper care, the responsibility often falls on charities and volunteers who rely heavily on public donations and support.

Attached is a news article regarding the high number of stray cats in Luton

 https://www.lutontoday.co.uk/news/people/cat-watch-scheme-will-help-lutons-stray-cats-3023850

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Ivanka Trump Shows Off Her Surfing Skills During Costa Rica Family Getaway

Ivanka Trump has swapped the political spotlight for the waves, showing off her surfing abilities during a family holiday in Costa Rica.

The 44-year-old businesswoman and former White House adviser was photographed surfing off the Costa Rican coast on August 23, as she enjoyed an active break with her family. 

Dressed in a white long-sleeved surf top with black bottoms, Ivanka climbed onto a soft-top longboard and took on the waves with the assistance of a surf instructor. Photographs showed her successfully standing on the board and maintaining her balance as she moved through the water. 

At one point, she appeared confident enough to raise her hand in a traditional “shaka” gesture associated with surfing. But the session was not completely flawless — she was also photographed falling from the board before getting back up and continuing to surf. 

Surfing Has Become a Regular Hobby

The Costa Rica trip is not Ivanka’s first experience with surfing. Reports indicate that she has returned to the country several times and has previously taken surfing lessons there.

Her connection with Costa Rica reportedly stretches back several years, with visits involving beaches around the Nicoya Peninsula and other popular coastal destinations. A local surf-school owner previously said that Ivanka and members of her family had been taking lessons for several years. 

The latest photographs suggest that her experience is paying off. Rather than simply posing with a surfboard, Ivanka was repeatedly photographed getting to her feet, riding waves and returning to the water after falling.

A Family Escape

The surfing session formed part of a wider family getaway. Ivanka has been photographed enjoying a range of outdoor activities during the trip, including spending time with her children.

She was also photographed horseback riding along the beach with her eldest daughter, Arabella, during the Costa Rica holiday. 

For Ivanka Trump, the trip provides a very different setting from the political world associated with her family name. Away from Washington and the White House, she has been able to focus on family, outdoor activities and one of her increasingly familiar hobbies — surfing.

Her latest Costa Rican adventure has now attracted international attention, with images of her balancing on the board, catching waves and recovering from a fall providing a glimpse into the more adventurous side of her life.

Attached is a news article regarding Ivanka  Trump showing off her surfing skills in Costa Rica 

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/ivanka-trump-takes-surfing-lesson-costa-rica-family-beach-vacation-getaway.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

California Man Arrested Again After Allegedly Sniffing Women in Stores

A California man who has gained notoriety online for allegedly approaching women and sniffing their buttocks has been arrested again, with police investigating another series of incidents in Glendale.

Calese Carron Crowder, 39, was arrested on Friday afternoon after employees at two Glendale businesses reported a man behaving suspiciously around customers and allegedly bending down behind people. According to Glendale police, investigators reviewed surveillance footage from both locations and identified Crowder as the suspect. 

Police later located Crowder nearby and arrested him on suspicion of a parole violation. One of the businesses was reportedly a Marshalls store, while a nearby grocery store also contacted police after a customer was allegedly seen bending down behind shoppers and attempting to sniff them. The investigation is continuing, and police say the case will be submitted to prosecutors for possible criminal charges.

A history of similar allegations

Crowder has previously been arrested in connection with similar incidents in the Glendale and Burbank areas. His alleged behaviour first attracted widespread attention in 2023, when a video circulated online appearing to show him following a woman around a Barnes & Noble store and getting close to her from behind.

The allegations resurfaced in July 2025, when Burbank police arrested Crowder following a report at a Nordstrom Rack. Authorities said surveillance footage appeared to show him following a female shopper, crouching behind her and allegedly sniffing her buttocks. He was subsequently arrested again the following month after another alleged incident at a Burbank Walgreens. 

Police have previously said that complaints involving similar alleged behaviour date back to 2021.

Registered sex offender and parole history

Crowder is a registered sex offender and has previously been on parole. His criminal history also includes convictions involving burglary and robbery, while he was sentenced in 2023 for indecent exposure. He has subsequently faced additional parole-related legal proceedings. 

The latest arrest has once again raised questions about how authorities deal with repeat offenders when allegations of unwanted behaviour continue to emerge.

However, an arrest is not a conviction, and the latest allegations against Crowder will have to be considered through the criminal justice process.

The Glendale investigation remains ongoing, with prosecutors expected to determine whether additional criminal charges should be brought.

Attached is a News article regarding a man who likes to sniff women’s butts was arrested for the 4th time 

https://ktul.com/news/nation-world/sex-offender-nicknamed-serial-butt-sniffer-on-social-media-arrested-again-in-california-calese-carron-crowder-crime-lewd-behavior-shopping-loitering-buttocks-rear-end

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

When Society Gets Consent Wrong: The Lasting Impact of Historical Attitudes Towards Children

A disturbing chapter in Britain’s history has resurfaced through a 1979 Home Office research report that considered whether the legal age of consent should be reduced from 16 to 14. The document, reported by The Guardian in 2014, also discussed substantially lower sentences in certain cases involving sexual activity with children.

The report is particularly uncomfortable today because of the language and assumptions surrounding the ability of young children to understand sexual relationships and give meaningful consent. Although the proposals were never adopted as British law, their existence raises important questions about how institutions and society have historically viewed childhood, vulnerability and protection. 

The danger of confusing childhood with adulthood

Children develop emotionally and psychologically at different rates. Physical development or puberty does not automatically mean that a child possesses the emotional maturity, independence or understanding required to make adult decisions.

That distinction is at the heart of the controversy surrounding the 1979 report.

The researchers argued that some young people could understand sexual activity at a much younger age. However, the very concept of applying adult ideas of consent to children raises serious concerns about power, influence and vulnerability.

A child may believe that they are making an independent decision while being influenced by an older person, authority figure, emotional pressure, manipulation or grooming.

That is why modern discussions about child protection place such importance on the responsibility of adults rather than expecting children to carry responsibility for situations they may not have the maturity to understand.

How attitudes can influence a child’s mindset

Society’s messages can have a powerful effect on children.

When children repeatedly encounter ideas suggesting that sexual behaviour is simply an adult choice that they should understand at an early age, it can potentially blur the boundaries between childhood and adulthood.

Children need clear messages that they have the right to boundaries, privacy and protection. They also need adults to explain that nobody has the right to pressure, manipulate or exploit them.

This becomes even more important in the modern digital age, where children can encounter pornography, sexualised material and conversations about relationships long before they are emotionally prepared for them.

Recent discussions around children, misogyny, consent and sexual violence have similarly stressed the importance of parents and adults having age-appropriate conversations with children and challenging harmful messages they encounter online. 

The psychological consequences can last into adulthood

The effects of childhood sexual exploitation or abuse do not necessarily disappear when a child reaches adulthood.

Experiences during childhood can affect how an individual later understands trust, relationships, personal boundaries and self-worth. Survivors may struggle with anxiety, fear, shame, anger, difficulties forming relationships or feelings of guilt about experiences for which they were not responsible.

This is why the language used by institutions and society matters.

If society tells a child that they were responsible for an adult’s behaviour, it can contribute to feelings of shame and confusion. Conversely, recognising that children require protection can help establish a much clearer principle: the responsibility belongs with the adult who holds greater power and understanding.

A warning from history

The 1979 report does not represent modern British law, nor does it mean that the Home Office officially adopted the proposals. It was a research document produced during a period when Britain was debating major changes to sexual-offence legislation. The Guardian reported that the authors recommended lowering the overall age of consent to 14 and proposed significant reductions in punishment in certain circumstances.

The historical episode nevertheless demonstrates how dramatically social attitudes can change.

What may have been presented decades ago as part of a debate about sexual liberation and personal freedom can look very different when examined through today’s understanding of grooming, power imbalance, childhood development and safeguarding.

The controversy is therefore not simply about what politicians or researchers believed in the past. It is about the importance of learning from history.

Protecting children must remain the priority

Britain’s approach to child protection has evolved considerably, but the underlying principle should remain straightforward: children deserve protection from adults who may exploit their vulnerability.

Consent is not simply about whether someone says “yes”. It involves understanding, freedom from pressure and the ability to make an informed decision. With children, those questions become particularly important because their emotional and cognitive development is still taking place.

The lesson from this historical debate should therefore not be to sensationalise the past, but to examine it carefully.

A society that protects children must recognise the difference between physical maturity and emotional maturity, between curiosity and informed consent, and between a child’s behaviour and an adult’s responsibility.

The history surrounding the 1979 Home Office report serves as a reminder that laws and social attitudes can change — and that protecting children must remain at the centre of those decisions.

For today’s generation, the challenge is to ensure that children grow up understanding their boundaries, recognising manipulation and knowing that they can seek help when something feels wrong.

Ultimately, childhood should be a period of development and protection, not a period in which children are expected to carry the psychological or legal responsibilities of adults.

Attached is a news article regarding Teresa may saying age of convent should be lowered to 13 years old 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/08/lower-age-consent-14-1979-home-office-report

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22459815

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

PC Andrew Harper’s Killers to Remain Behind Bars as Andy Burnham Changes Early Release Rules

The killers of Police Constable Andrew Harper are set to remain in prison after Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced changes to the Government’s controversial early-release scheme.

The announcement follows weeks of public anger over plans that could have allowed two men convicted over PC Harper’s death to leave prison earlier than originally expected.

PC Andrew Harper, 28, was killed in August 2019 while responding to the theft of a quad bike in Berkshire. He became caught in a strap attached to a vehicle and was dragged along the road as the offenders fled the scene. 

Jessie Cole and Albert Bowers, who were teenagers at the time of the offence, were convicted of manslaughter and each received a 13-year custodial sentence in 2020. A third man, Henry Long, received a longer sentence and is not affected by the same early-release arrangements.

Fears over early release

The controversy began after it emerged that Cole and Bowers could potentially qualify for release after serving half of their sentences under emergency measures introduced to tackle severe overcrowding across England and Wales.

The Government’s wider scheme was designed to create additional prison capacity by allowing thousands of eligible prisoners to leave custody earlier. The policy generated significant criticism, particularly when families of victims discovered that some serious offenders could potentially benefit.

Police leaders also strongly opposed the possibility of PC Harper’s killers being released early. The Civil Nuclear Constabulary’s Chief Constable Simon Chesterman said those involved in Harper’s killing should remain in prison for the remainder of their sentences.

Burnham promises action

Prime Minister Andy Burnham initially faced pressure after the Government confirmed that manslaughter convictions were not automatically excluded from the scheme.

However, Burnham later said he was increasingly confident that a way could be found to prevent Harper’s killers from being released early. He instructed Justice Secretary Alex Norris to examine further options, including changes that would keep some of the most serious offenders behind bars. 

The Government has now announced that people convicted of unlawful killing will be excluded from the early-release scheme. As a result, Cole and Bowers are expected to remain in prison rather than being released early under the controversial measures. Burnham said the changes would mean hundreds of prisoners remaining behind bars.

A major political and public debate

The Harper case has become one of the most prominent examples in the wider debate surrounding Britain’s prison overcrowding crisis.

The Government has argued that urgent action is required because prisons are operating under extreme pressure. At the same time, victims’ families, police organisations and campaigners have argued that prison capacity should not result in people convicted of serious offences being released before they have completed the appropriate custodial period.

The issue has also attracted enormous public attention, with a petition calling for Harper’s killers to be kept in prison receiving more than one million signatures, according to reports. 

For PC Harper’s family and colleagues, the latest decision means that the men convicted over his death are expected to remain behind bars rather than benefit from the emergency early-release arrangements.

The case has also placed renewed pressure on the Government to find a long-term solution to Britain’s prison-capacity problems — without reducing public confidence in the criminal justice system.

Attached is a news article regarding PC harper killers not set to be freed under Andy burnham new rules 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crr4wd81pdpo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Britain’s ‘Biggest-Ever’ Child Sex Abuse Case: Offenders Jailed for 145 Years

A major child sexual abuse investigation in the West Midlands resulted in 21 people being convicted, with members of the group receiving prison sentences totalling around 145 years.

The case, investigated by West Midlands Police, exposed years of horrific sexual abuse involving seven children, some of whom were aged 12 or under. The offences took place across the Walsall and Wolverhampton areas and continued for almost a decade. 

The investigation began after one of the victims was taken to hospital in 2017. Medical staff raised safeguarding concerns, prompting police to investigate what had happened and ultimately uncovering a much wider pattern of abuse.

The subsequent investigation, known as Operation Satchel, became one of the largest child sexual abuse investigations ever conducted by West Midlands Police. It involved years of police work and extensive court proceedings.

Of the 21 people convicted, 17 were ultimately jailed, with individual sentences ranging from relatively short custodial terms to life imprisonment. Thirteen members of the group received custodial sentences that together amounted to approximately 145 years. 

The case also involved eight women, highlighting that child sexual exploitation and abuse can involve perpetrators of different genders and roles. The convictions covered a range of serious sexual offences committed against vulnerable children.

Police described the abuse as particularly abhorrent and cruel. The investigation demonstrated how abuse can remain hidden for years, particularly when children are unable to disclose what is happening or when adults around them fail to recognise the warning signs.

The sentences brought criminal accountability for those convicted, but the impact on the victims is likely to continue long after the court proceedings ended. Survivors of childhood sexual abuse can experience profound and long-lasting consequences, making safeguarding, early intervention and access to specialist support essential.

The case remains a stark reminder of the importance of listening to children, acting on safeguarding concerns and investigating allegations of abuse thoroughly.

While the combined 145-year figure is striking, it should not be confused with a single 145-year prison sentence. It represents the cumulative custodial sentences handed down to offenders involved in the wider case.

For the victims and their families, the convictions represented the culmination of years of investigation into crimes that had remained hidden for far too long.

Attached is a news article regarding Britain biggest child sex ring getting 145 years in jail 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-65189785

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Kane Morrison and the Shooting That Targeted His Family Home

A violent gang feud in Greater Manchester escalated in October 2015 when the family home of Kane Morrison became the target of a shooting, leaving a member of his family seriously injured.

Morrison, from Little Hulton, was later identified by police and prosecutors as being connected to a series of shootings carried out during a violent feud between rival organised crime groups in the Salford area. Greater Manchester Police subsequently obtained a civil injunction against Morrison as part of efforts to stop the violence. 

According to evidence presented during the later court case, the chain of violence began when rivals fired a shotgun at Morrison’s home address on 10 October 2015. A family member was seriously injured during the attack. The incident then became a catalyst for a retaliatory series of shootings. 

Reports surrounding the wider feud state that, during an earlier shooting at the home of Morrison’s mother, her partner was shot in the back. The attack demonstrated how the conflict had extended beyond the alleged gang members themselves and placed relatives and people inside family homes at serious risk. 

Following the attack on Morrison’s family, prosecutors said Morrison and other members of the group met later that day and planned retaliation. At approximately 10.05pm, Morrison and Harry Allen travelled by moped to an address in Farnworth, where shots were fired at a property while a couple were inside watching television. Fortunately, nobody was injured in that particular attack. 

The violence continued with another shooting at a property in Little Hulton just over an hour later.

Police eventually pieced together the events using CCTV footage and telephone records, establishing the involvement of several men. The investigation resulted in a major criminal case involving six men and the wider Salford gang feud. 

In October 2017, Morrison pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess a firearm with intent to endanger life. He was sentenced at Manchester Crown Court to 17 years in prison, with the sentence also including offences involving a mobile phone and SIM card while he was in prison. 

The case illustrates the devastating consequences of gang-related violence: when firearms are used in disputes between rival groups, the danger can quickly reach innocent relatives, partners and residents who have no involvement in the conflict.

The shooting at Morrison’s family home was therefore more than another episode in a gang feud. It showed how violence between rival groups could spill directly into family homes, putting ordinary people in the line of fire.

Attached is a article on gang member Kane Morrison who mother home was shot at 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/violent-gang-members-blighted-streets-13743500

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Serine Sanneh Faces Serious Allegation Involving a 13-Year-Old Girl

Baller League goalkeeper Serine Sanneh has reportedly become the subject of serious allegations involving a 13-year-old girl, prompting widespread discussion online.

Sanneh, a former England youth goalkeeper who has also been associated with professional academies including West Ham and has appeared in the Baller League, has recently been mentioned in social-media posts alleging that he was arrested in connection with an offence involving a minor. However, at the time of publication, the claims circulating online have not been sufficiently verified by authoritative sources to establish exactly what happened or what charges, if any, have formally been brought. 

Allegations circulating online

Posts circulating on social media have described Sanneh using extremely serious language and have referred to alleged offences involving a 13-year-old girl. One widely circulated post claimed that the Baller League player had been arrested on an allegation involving a minor. 

However, social-media claims should not automatically be treated as established facts. Another publicly available post concerning Sanneh states that an allegation has been described as false, highlighting that there are conflicting claims surrounding the situation. 

No presumption of guilt

The allegations are extremely serious because they concern a child. At the same time, an allegation or arrest does not mean that a person has been found guilty.

Unless and until a court establishes the facts, Sanneh remains entitled to the presumption of innocence. It is therefore important to distinguish between what has been alleged online, what police may have investigated, what charges may have been filed and what has actually been proven in court.

Sanneh’s football career

Before becoming known through the Baller League, Sanneh represented England at youth level and spent time within academy football. He has been photographed and reported alongside players who went on to become major names in the professional game, including Cole Palmer. 

The 23-year-old goalkeeper later joined the Baller League and was managed by former England and Chelsea captain John Terry. His football career had previously been described as a fight to return to the professional game after setbacks. 

What happens next?

The key issue now is whether there is an official police statement, formal charge, court hearing or other reliable evidence confirming the circumstances behind the allegations.

Because the alleged victim is a child, identifying information about the girl should not be published. Any reporting should also avoid presenting unverified social-media accusations as established facts.

If formal proceedings are taking place, the evidence presented in court will ultimately determine what can be established.

At present, the responsible position is to describe the matter as an allegation and not label Serine Sanneh a convicted sexual offender or predator unless a court has established that fact.

Attached is a news article regarding a ballers league player targeting a 13 year old 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcihotcA42S/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Meta Faces Billions in Social Media Addiction Settlement After Landmark Teen Trial

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has agreed to pay billions of dollars to settle a landmark legal battle over allegations that its platforms contributed to social-media addiction and harmed young people’s wellbeing.

The case has become one of the biggest legal challenges ever faced by a social-media company. Dozens of US states accused Meta of deliberately designing Facebook and Instagram in ways that encouraged young users to spend excessive amounts of time on its platforms.

After months of legal proceedings and testimony, Meta agreed to a settlement that could be worth up to $18 billion. The agreement covers claims brought by 48 US states and territories and also requires Meta to introduce stronger protections for teenagers. 

What was Meta accused of?

The states alleged that Meta knew its products could have harmful effects on children and teenagers while continuing to use features designed to maximise engagement.

Among the features examined were recommendation algorithms, notifications, infinite scrolling and other mechanisms that can encourage users to remain on the platforms for longer periods.

During the trial, Instagram chief Adam Mosseri faced questions about the company’s efforts to encourage teenagers to take breaks from the platform. Evidence presented in court examined the use of Instagram’s “Take a Break” feature and how few teenagers initially activated it. 

The states argued that excessive social-media use could contribute to problems including anxiety, depression, body-image concerns and other mental-health difficulties among young people.

Meta has denied deliberately designing its services to addict children and has disputed claims that its platforms are responsible for the wider decline in adolescent mental health. 

Major changes for teenagers

The settlement is not only about money.

Meta has agreed to introduce stronger restrictions and safety measures for younger users. Among the reported changes are daily usage limits, restrictions on overnight access, stronger parental controls and changes to notifications and content recommendations. 

Teen accounts are also expected to receive greater protection from certain forms of harmful content and features that can encourage social comparison.

The settlement could therefore have a major effect on how teenagers use Facebook and Instagram in the United States.

How much will Meta actually pay?

The headline figure is potentially $18 billion, although the settlement is structured over a number of years rather than representing one immediate payment.

Reports indicate that a substantial portion is guaranteed, while additional payments are linked to whether competing platforms introduce comparable child-safety measures. 

This is considerably larger than the $1.7 billion figure that has circulated in some reports or social-media discussions.

The settlement also does not necessarily end every legal battle facing Meta. Individual families, schools and other parties continue to pursue separate claims involving alleged harms caused by social-media platforms.

A warning for the entire technology industry

The case could have consequences far beyond Meta.

State officials and campaigners argue that social-media companies should be held responsible for how their products affect children, rather than simply leaving parents to control how much time their children spend online.

The settlement may also increase pressure on other major platforms, including TikTok, YouTube and Snapchat, to introduce stronger protections for younger users.

For Meta, the agreement represents a significant financial and reputational setback, but the company continues to deny wrongdoing.

The wider question now is whether billions of dollars in penalties and stricter controls will be enough to change the way social-media platforms are designed — or whether technology companies will continue to rely on systems designed to keep users coming back.

The Meta case could ultimately become a turning point in the battle over children’s safety online, with governments increasingly challenging the business models behind the world’s biggest social-media platforms.

Attached is a news article regarding meta paying 17.1 billion dollars over addiction on social media 

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/26/technology/meta-settlement-social-media-addiction-lawsuit.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/54144156