Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.
Kammar Henry-Richards, known in the music industry as rapper Kay-O, has been sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 37 years for his involvement in the murder of 25-year-old father, Kacey Boothe. The incident occurred on August 13, 2022, outside the Peterhouse Community Centre in Walthamstow, London, where Boothe was fatally shot while getting into his car after attending a child’s birthday party.
Henry-Richards, aged 26, was associated with the E9 or Holly Street gangs in London. Following the murder, he released a drill music video titled “Laughing Stock,” in which he boasted about the killing and referenced the use of the same firearm in a previous attack on Boothe’s brother in 2020. The lyrics included specific details about the murder that were not publicly known, indicating his direct involvement.
During the trial at the Old Bailey, the court heard that the murder was a planned revenge attack stemming from ongoing gang rivalries and tit-for-tat violence in the area. Judge Lynn Tayton KC remarked on the tragic waste of potential, noting that Henry-Richards was a promising artist whose life took a destructive path due to his gang affiliations.
In addition to Henry-Richards, three other individuals were convicted and sentenced for their roles in the murder:
•Ka’mani Brightly-Donaldson, 25, received a life sentence with a minimum term of 38 years.
•Jeffrey Gyimah, 23, was sentenced to life with a minimum term of 35 years.
•Joao Pateco-Te, 28, received a life sentence with a minimum term of 37 years.
All four defendants were found guilty of murder, conspiracy to murder, and conspiracy to possess a firearm with intent to endanger life.
The victim’s family expressed profound grief and loss during the sentencing. Marcia Rowe, Boothe’s mother, stated that the “callous murder” had destroyed her son’s dreams and aspirations, leaving an irreplaceable void in their lives. Boothe’s partner, Shanice Thomas-Brown, highlighted the devastating impact on their children, who have been forced to grapple with concepts of life, death, and violence at a young age.
This case underscores the tragic consequences of gang-related violence and the role that certain music genres, such as drill, can play in perpetuating and glorifying such conflicts. The court’s verdict serves as a stern reminder of the severe legal repercussions for those involved in violent criminal activities.
Attached is a news article regarding the rapper Kay-O who was jailed for 37 years for murder
In a heartfelt return to the Royal Marsden Hospital in London, Catherine, Princess of Wales, announced that her cancer is in remission. This visit marked her first solo engagement since completing chemotherapy, symbolizing a significant milestone in her journey toward recovery.
During her visit, Princess Catherine expressed profound gratitude to the medical staff who provided exceptional care throughout her treatment. She engaged warmly with current patients, offering words of encouragement and sharing personal insights from her own experience. In one touching interaction, she embraced a mother whose daughter is undergoing treatment, reassuring her that “there’s light at the end of the tunnel.”
The Princess’s battle with cancer became public in March 2024, following a planned abdominal surgery earlier that year. She underwent chemotherapy and made limited public appearances during her treatment. Her return to the Royal Marsden Hospital not only signifies her personal resilience but also underscores her commitment to supporting others facing similar health challenges.
In recognition of their dedication to cancer care, both Princess Catherine and Prince William have been appointed Joint Patrons of the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. This role enables them to advocate for advancements in cancer treatment and patient well-being actively.
The public has responded with an outpouring of support and condolences, empathizing with the Princess’s journey. Her openness about her diagnosis and treatment has resonated deeply, offering solace and inspiration to many. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and other public figures have extended their well-wishes, highlighting the widespread impact of her experience.
Princess Catherine’s experience sheds light on the broader reality faced by countless individuals battling cancer. Her advocacy emphasizes the importance of early detection, comprehensive treatment, and the invaluable support of healthcare professionals. By sharing her journey, she has fostered a sense of solidarity and hope among those confronting similar health challenges.
As she gradually resumes her royal duties, Princess Catherine’s resilience serves as a beacon of hope and strength. Her story underscores the significance of compassion, community support, and the relentless pursuit of well-being in the face of adversity.
Attached is a news article regarding Kate Middleton return to cancer hospital
Prison Drones: A Growing Threat to National Security
In recent years, the rise of drone technology has revolutionized industries ranging from delivery services to agriculture. However, this same technology has found a dark application within the confines of national security, as drones are increasingly being used to breach prison perimeters, smuggling contraband and potentially endangering public safety.
The Rise of Prison Drones
Drones, with their ability to bypass traditional security measures, have become a popular tool for delivering illicit goods into prisons. These small, agile devices are used to transport drugs, weapons, mobile phones, and other prohibited items, directly to inmates. Operating under the cover of darkness and guided by GPS, they often evade detection by prison staff.
In 2023, the UK alone reported over 300 drone-related incidents at correctional facilities, a staggering increase from previous years. The trend is mirrored globally, with prisons in the United States, Europe, and Asia reporting similar threats.
The National Security Implications
The implications of prison drones extend far beyond individual facilities. Smuggled items, particularly mobile phones, allow inmates to coordinate criminal activities both inside and outside the prison. These activities can include organizing drug trafficking, orchestrating violent attacks, and facilitating escapes.
One high-profile case involved a drone delivering a handgun to an inmate in a maximum-security prison in Brazil, which was later used in an escape attempt. In the UK, authorities discovered drones carrying encrypted communication devices to prisoners tied to organized crime networks.
The potential for drones to be used in terrorist activities within prisons is also a growing concern. With access to contraband, extremist groups could plot attacks from within, creating a significant national security risk.
Challenges in Combatting Drone Threats
One of the primary challenges in addressing the drone threat is the technology’s rapid advancement. Drones are becoming smaller, faster, and harder to detect. Traditional security measures, such as high walls and perimeter fencing, are ineffective against aerial intrusions.
Efforts to combat this issue include the deployment of drone detection systems, which use radar and radio frequency monitoring to identify and intercept drones. However, these systems are expensive and require significant investment. Additionally, legal and ethical concerns arise when implementing counter-drone measures such as jamming signals or physically disabling drones.
Government and Policy Responses
Governments worldwide are beginning to take the threat of prison drones seriously. In the UK, the Prisons and Courts Bill introduced harsher penalties for individuals caught flying drones near correctional facilities. The United States has also enacted measures allowing prison authorities to disable or intercept drones that pose a security threat.
However, experts argue that more needs to be done. A comprehensive approach, combining advanced technology, stricter regulations, and improved intelligence-sharing, is essential to address this growing issue.
The Future of Drone Threats
As drone technology continues to evolve, so too will the methods used by criminals to exploit it. Addressing the prison drone crisis requires ongoing collaboration between governments, law enforcement agencies, and technology developers. Failure to act could result in an escalation of the threat, with significant consequences for public safety and national security.
The fight against prison drones is a battle between innovation and regulation. The question remains: can governments stay one step ahead of those who seek to exploit technology for criminal purposes
By tackling this issue head-on, societies can ensure that drones remain a force for good, rather than a tool for chaos.
Attached is a news article regarding the drone that are use to bring goods in to prison across the uk
Foreign Secretary David Lammy has announced that a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas is imminent, expressing optimism that this development will facilitate the rebuilding of Gaza and ensure Israel’s security.
Lammy emphasized that such a deal would enable the region to “move forward in an atmosphere of peace,” addressing concerns raised by MPs about the safety of hostages held by Hamas.
The United States, Egypt, and Qatar have been mediating to end the 15-month conflict and secure the release of hostages captured during Hamas’s attack on October 7, 2023. Qatar, a key mediator, stated that Israel and Hamas are at the “closest point” yet to an agreement.
During Foreign Office questions in the Commons, Labour MP Jake Richard (Rother Valley) inquired about steps the Government is taking to secure humanitarian access before the release of hostages, noting that “Hamas are disgracefully avoiding” such measures. Lammy responded, “As has been said by Joe Biden, we may well be on the brink of a deal, and I know this whole House will want to see that deal emerge in the coming days.”
He added, “Rest assured that humanitarian access, as we have continued to press for the people of Gaza, is hugely important, but it’s as important for those hostages.”
Conservative MP Dame Priti Patel (Witham) raised concerns about the lack of proof of life for hostages. Lammy assured that efforts are ongoing to establish this, stating, “We are doing all we can to continue to make that necessary assessment.”
He further mentioned that the anticipated deal would be the “first phase” of an agreement likely to span six weeks, expressing hope for a ceasefire and the necessary rebuilding of Gaza with Israel remaining safe and secure.
This development follows Lammy’s earlier calls for an immediate ceasefire during his visit to Israel and the Palestinian Territories, where he met with Israeli political leaders to push for a deal between Israel and Hamas for the release of hostages.
The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, with hopes that a formal agreement will lead to lasting peace and stability in the region.
Here are the key points from David Lammy’s discussion regarding the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal:
1.Imminent Ceasefire Deal:
David Lammy expressed optimism about an impending ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, stating it could enable Gaza’s rebuilding and ensure Israel’s security.
2.Hostage Concerns:
Lammy addressed MPs’ concerns about hostages held by Hamas. He emphasized ongoing efforts to secure their release and ensure proof of life.
3.International Mediation:
The ceasefire negotiations are being mediated by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar. Qatar has indicated that both sides are closer than ever to reaching an agreement.
4.Parliamentary Discussions:
In response to questions from MPs, Lammy reiterated the importance of humanitarian access to Gaza and highlighted the connection between this and resolving the hostage crisis.
5.First Phase of a Longer Agreement:
Lammy stated that the anticipated deal would be the first phase of a broader agreement, potentially spanning six weeks, aimed at ensuring peace and rebuilding the region.
6.Priti Patel’s Concerns:
Conservative MP Dame Priti Patel raised concerns about the lack of proof of life for hostages, to which Lammy assured that assessments were ongoing.
7.Focus on Peace and Stability:
Lammy emphasized that a ceasefire would help the region move forward in peace, aligning with calls from international leaders like U.S. President Joe Biden.
8.Past Advocacy:
Lammy had previously called for an immediate ceasefire during his visit to Israel and the Palestinian Territories, highlighting his commitment to de-escalation and diplomacy.
These developments are being closely monitored, with hopes that the agreement will lead to lasting peace and stability in the region.
In conclusion, David Lammy’s discussions on the Israel-Hamas ceasefire reflect a crucial step toward ending the ongoing conflict and addressing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. His emphasis on securing hostages’ release, ensuring humanitarian access, and fostering long-term stability highlights the delicate balance of diplomacy required in the region. With international mediators like the U.S., Egypt, and Qatar playing pivotal roles, the anticipated deal marks a hopeful turning point. However, its success will depend on sustained cooperation, accountability, and a collective commitment to peace and security for all affected communities.
Attached is a news article regarding David lammy view on the ceasefire between Isreal and Hamas
Tyson Fury Retires from Boxing: A Legendary Career Comes to a Close
In a move that has sent shockwaves through the boxing world, Tyson Fury, the self-proclaimed “Gypsy King,” has officially announced his retirement from the sport. The announcement marks the end of an era for one of the most charismatic, unpredictable, and successful heavyweights in the history of boxing.
A Career of Highs and Lows
Tyson Fury’s career has been nothing short of extraordinary. Born in Manchester in 1988 to a family of Irish Travellers, Fury’s journey to the top of the boxing world was shaped by resilience, determination, and raw talent. He burst onto the international scene in 2015 when he defeated Wladimir Klitschko, ending the Ukrainian’s decade-long dominance of the heavyweight division and claiming the WBA, IBF, WBO, and IBO titles.
However, Fury’s career was as tumultuous outside the ring as it was dazzling within it. After his triumph over Klitschko, he faced mental health challenges, substance abuse issues, and a two-year hiatus from the sport. Despite these setbacks, Fury’s comeback story became one of the most inspiring narratives in modern boxing.
In 2020, Fury stunned the world by dismantling Deontay Wilder in a rematch to claim the WBC heavyweight title. Their trilogy—arguably one of the greatest in boxing history—cemented Fury’s place among the sport’s legends. His technical brilliance, unmatched endurance, and towering 6’9” frame made him a formidable and unique force in the ring.
The Retirement Announcement
Fury has flirted with retirement before, often teasing fans with the possibility of hanging up his gloves. This time, however, the announcement seems definitive. In a heartfelt statement, Fury expressed gratitude to his family, team, and fans. “Boxing has given me everything, but now it’s time to give back to my family and focus on the next chapter of my life,” Fury said.
Legacy and Impact
Tyson Fury’s legacy extends far beyond his undefeated record and multiple world titles. His openness about mental health struggles has had a profound impact, inspiring countless fans and raising awareness about the importance of seeking help.
Inside the ring, Fury’s ability to adapt his style—whether as a slick, defensive counterpuncher or an aggressive knockout artist—has set him apart as one of the most versatile heavyweights of all time.
Fury exits the sport with an unblemished professional record, standing as one of the few heavyweight champions in history to retire undefeated.
What’s Next for the Gypsy King
While stepping away from boxing, Fury has hinted at pursuing other interests, including charity work, motivational speaking, and potentially more ventures in entertainment. With his larger-than-life personality and knack for captivating an audience, Fury’s presence will undoubtedly continue to be felt beyond the sport.
A Farewell to a Champion
Tyson Fury’s retirement marks the conclusion of a remarkable chapter in boxing history. From dethroning giants to overcoming personal demons, Fury’s story is one of triumph, redemption, and resilience. As the Gypsy King bows out, he leaves behind a legacy that will inspire future generations of fighters and fans alike.
For the boxing world, the Gypsy King’s absence will be deeply felt. For Tyson Fury, the next fight is one for personal fulfillment and happiness—a battle he seems poised to win.
Attached is a news article regarding Tyson fury retirement from boxing
Inspector Charles Ehikioya, the head of the Metropolitan Police’s Black Police Association (MBPA), has been dismissed for gross misconduct following the discovery of offensive messages exchanged via WhatsApp. The messages, shared between 2017 and 2020 with former officer Carlo Francisco, included content that was racist, sexist, homophobic, and ableist.
A misconduct hearing revealed that over 7,000 inappropriate messages were exchanged during this period. Among these was an image sent by Ehikioya of the late Playboy founder Hugh Hefner, accompanied by the comment: “message from the other side, tell the Muslims there’s no 72 virgins left.” Other messages included derogatory remarks about Chinese people, jokes about individuals with Down’s syndrome, and mockery of the late Duke of Edinburgh’s car crash. Additionally, a video was shared depicting a child with a naked bottom.
Ehikioya denied the allegations, asserting that the claims were fabricated due to his race or position within the MBPA. He stated, “I believe this outcome was manipulated to ensure a finding against me and is part of a deliberate campaign to smear my reputation.” He further expressed his intention to appeal the decision.
The panel, led by Commander Jason Prins, found that Ehikioya’s behavior breached standards of professional conduct, particularly concerning equality and diversity, discreditable conduct, and the failure to challenge and report improper conduct. Prins commented, “The panel found that the messages sent by Inspector Ehikioya or received by him, which he failed to challenge or report, deeply damage public confidence in the police service.”
The investigation into these messages began after a complaint led to the seizure of Francisco’s phone, uncovering the offensive correspondence. Francisco had previously been dismissed for an unrelated misconduct issue.
This incident has raised concerns about the culture within the Metropolitan Police Service, especially given Ehikioya’s prominent role in representing black officers. The National Black Police Association (NBPA) has criticized the disciplinary process, citing “irregularities” and the extended time taken to reach an outcome, noting that the allegations date back to 2020. Andy George, president of the NBPA, stated that the organization supported Ehikioya “from a fairness and integrity point of view” and not as a judgment of his guilt or innocence.
The Metropolitan Police has faced scrutiny over its internal culture, with this case highlighting ongoing challenges in addressing inappropriate behavior within its ranks. The force has acknowledged concerns about disproportionality in its misconduct system and has indicated that reforms are underway to address these issues.
Here are the key points regarding the dismissal of Inspector Charles Ehikioya, the head of the Metropolitan Police’s Black Police Association:
1.Reason for Dismissal:
Inspector Charles Ehikioya was dismissed for gross misconduct after a misconduct hearing revealed he exchanged offensive messages via WhatsApp with former officer Carlo Francisco between 2017 and 2020.
2.Nature of Messages:
•The messages included content that was racist, sexist, homophobic, and ableist.
•Offensive content included a comment mocking Muslims, derogatory remarks about Chinese people, jokes about individuals with Down’s syndrome, and a video of a child with a naked bottom.
3.Defense by Ehikioya:
•Ehikioya denied the allegations, claiming they were fabricated due to his race or position in the Black Police Association.
•He accused the Metropolitan Police of targeting him and plans to appeal the decision.
4.Investigation and Findings:
•The messages were uncovered during a separate investigation into Francisco, whose phone was seized after a complaint.
•Francisco was previously dismissed for unrelated misconduct.
5.Misconduct Panel’s Decision:
•The panel found that Ehikioya’s behavior breached professional standards, including equality, diversity, and the duty to challenge improper conduct.
•Commander Jason Prins stated the behavior deeply damaged public confidence in the police service.
6.Reaction from the National Black Police Association (NBPA):
•The NBPA criticized the disciplinary process for its delays and “irregularities.”
•NBPA president Andy George clarified that their support for Ehikioya was based on fairness in the process, not judgment of his guilt or innocence.
7.Implications for the Metropolitan Police:
•The case has raised concerns about the culture within the Met and the integrity of its misconduct system.
•The force has acknowledged the need for reforms to address disproportionality in handling misconduct cases.
This case highlights significant challenges within the Metropolitan Police regarding accountability, equality, and public trust.
The dismissal of Inspector Charles Ehikioya, the head of the Metropolitan Police’s Black Police Association, underscores the complex challenges faced by the Metropolitan Police in addressing misconduct while maintaining public trust. While the offensive nature of the messages exchanged cannot be understated, the case also raises important questions about the transparency and fairness of the disciplinary process. The controversy surrounding Ehikioya’s defense, the role of internal bias, and the broader cultural issues within the force highlight a need for systemic reform. For an institution tasked with upholding equality and justice, this incident serves as a stark reminder of the work still required to rebuild public confidence and ensure accountability at all levels.
Attached is a news article regarding the sacking of a black met police officer over racial slurs
Shadow Minister Claims Labour Can Be Ousted from Office
A senior shadow minister has issued a bold statement claiming that the Labour Party could be removed from office if it continues to pursue policies that alienate voters. The remarks, which have sparked debate within the political sphere, come as the party faces scrutiny over its strategy and connection with grassroots supporters.
Speaking at a recent political gathering, the shadow minister suggested that Labour’s leadership risks losing public trust by failing to address the concerns of key demographics, particularly in traditional strongholds. “If Labour continues down this path, the electorate will find a way to remove us from power. No party is invincible,” they remarked.
The comments have been interpreted as a direct critique of Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s approach, particularly his focus on appealing to centrist voters. Some party insiders argue that this strategy risks alienating the working-class base that has historically been the bedrock of Labour’s support.
Internal Divisions Exposed
The shadow minister’s statement has exposed underlying tensions within the party. While some members back Starmer’s attempts to modernize Labour and broaden its appeal, others fear this could result in the loss of Labour’s identity and core principles.
A prominent backbencher, speaking anonymously, expressed concern: “We’re at a crossroads. The leadership is focused on the next general election, but there’s a risk we’ll forget who we’re fighting for. The public won’t forgive us if we lose sight of our values.”
Public Reaction
The remarks have drawn mixed reactions from the public and political analysts. Some see them as a wake-up call for Labour to realign its priorities, while others view them as internal party squabbles that could harm its chances at the ballot box.
Political commentator Alex Rowley suggested the comments highlight a broader issue: “The shadow minister’s warning is reflective of Labour’s struggle to balance modernisation with tradition. It’s a challenge every major party faces, but these divisions can weaken their position in the eyes of voters.”
Next Steps for Labour
As the general election approaches, Labour faces mounting pressure to present a cohesive vision. Recent polls indicate a steady but not overwhelming lead over the Conservatives, suggesting that voter confidence is far from assured.
For Labour to secure its place in power, it may need to reconcile internal differences and focus on delivering policies that resonate with a broad spectrum of voters. Whether the shadow minister’s warning will serve as a turning point or deepen divisions within the party remains to be seen.
Labour’s leadership has yet to respond to the remarks, but the debate surrounding the party’s future strategy is unlikely to subside anytime soon.
Attached is a news article regarding the shadow minister saying that labour can be removed from office
