Thursday, 29 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Shooting Incident Reported at DJ AG Event Involving Rapper Giggs

A violent incident was reported at a DJ AG–hosted music event attended by UK rapper Giggs, after a firearm was discharged during the gathering, leaving one man seriously injured.

According to accounts circulating around the event, a single shot was fired in the direction of the stage area where Giggs was present. While the rapper was not injured, the bullet struck another individual in the foot. The victim reportedly suffered significant damage to the bones in his foot and required urgent medical treatment.

Emergency services were called to the scene, and the injured man was taken to hospital. The extent of his injuries is understood to be serious but non-life-threatening. No further casualties were reported.

Police have launched an investigation into the shooting, treating it as a firearms offence. At this stage, no confirmed arrests have been publicly announced, and authorities have not identified a suspect. Officers are continuing to gather witness statements and review any available footage from the event.

Importantly, there is no indication that Giggs was involved in the shooting, nor that he was the intended target beyond speculation circulating online. Sources close to the event have stressed that the rapper was attending in a professional capacity and left unharmed.

The incident has reignited concerns about security at live music events and the growing risks faced by performers, staff, and fans alike. DJ AG events, often celebrated for bringing artists and communities together, are typically seen as positive cultural spaces—making the violence particularly troubling.

As the investigation continues, police have urged anyone with information to come forward. Further updates are expected once more details are confirmed.

Attached is a news article regarding gun shots fired at a DJ AG event 

https://mixmag.net/amp/giggs-allegedly-targeted-drive-by-shooting-dj-ag-event-documentary-reveals

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 




Smileband News




Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

How Much Salary Do We Really Keep After Tax – And Should It Change

For most working people, the salary written on a contract is not the salary that ends up in their bank account. Income tax, National Insurance, student loans, council tax, VAT, and rising living costs mean that a large portion of earnings disappears before it can be used to improve quality of life or stimulate the wider economy. This raises a serious question: does the current tax structure help or hold back economic growth and innovation. 

How Much of Your Salary Is Kept After Tax

In the UK, an average worker earning around £35,000 a year will typically lose:

20% income tax above the personal allowance

8–12% National Insurance

Student loan repayments (if applicable)

Indirect taxes like VAT on almost everything they buy

By the time all deductions are considered, many workers keep only 65–70% of their gross salary, and for higher earners the percentage can fall much lower. This reduced take-home pay limits savings, investment, and consumer spending.

The Impact on Living Standards

When people keep less of what they earn, daily life becomes about survival rather than progress. Rising rent, mortgages, energy bills, and food costs mean wages no longer stretch as they once did. This creates a workforce that is:

Less able to save

Less likely to start businesses

More stressed and financially insecure

A population under financial pressure cannot fully participate in or contribute to economic growth.

Does High Tax Reduce Innovation and Risk-Taking

Innovation thrives when people have financial breathing room. Starting a business, learning new skills, or developing new ideas requires time, money, and risk tolerance. High effective tax rates reduce all three.

When skilled workers see little reward for extra effort or advancement, motivation drops. Many choose safer, lower-risk roles instead of entrepreneurship or creative industries. Over time, this leads to a cycle of low innovation and stagnant productivity.

Could Tax Reform Improve the Economy

Changing how much salary people keep could have powerful economic effects:

Higher take-home pay increases spending, boosting local businesses

More disposable income supports education, training, and innovation

Small business creation becomes more viable

Job creation increases as demand rises

Lower taxes at lower and middle incomes could also reduce reliance on benefits and public support, balancing government finances in the long term.

A Shift Toward Income Flow, Not Punishment

Instead of heavily taxing earned income, a more balanced system could:

Reward productivity and skill development

Tax excessive wealth accumulation more fairly

Encourage reinvestment into businesses and innovation

Support job creation rather than dependency

An economy grows stronger when money flows through people, not when it is trapped or drained before it can circulate.

Conclusion

The amount of salary people keep after tax plays a direct role in quality of life, economic confidence, and national productivity. While taxation is necessary to fund public services, an overly heavy burden on earned income risks slowing innovation, discouraging ambition, and weakening long-term growth.

Reforming the system to allow workers to keep more of what they earn could improve living standards, unlock creativity, and drive the economy in a healthier, more sustainable direction. A thriving economy is not built on pressure alone—it is built on opportunity, reward, and momentum.

Attached is a news article regarding tax in the uk 

https://www.lombardodier.com/home/private-clients/local-solutions/uk-offering/uk-fig-regime.html?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=15854947353&gbraid=0AAAAADQKur8XzSzh77L6Peyf333mzovlm

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Wednesday, 28 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Satellites Around Earth: Why Space Is Crowded — and What the Real Risks Are

Orbiting above Earth is an invisible but vital network of technology. Thousands of satellites circle the planet every day, enabling modern life as we know it. From GPS navigation and weather forecasting to global communications and military surveillance, satellites have become essential infrastructure. Yet as their numbers grow, so do public concerns about space clutter, radiation, and even the fear of weapons being placed in orbit.

Understanding what is actually happening in space is critical — especially at a time when misinformation can create unnecessary fear.

How Many Satellites Are Around Earth

As of the mid-2020s, more than 8,000 active satellites orbit Earth, with tens of thousands more pieces of space debris, often referred to as “space junk” or “clutter.” Most satellites orbit in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), between 160 and 2,000 kilometres above the planet. This region is popular because it allows faster communication and lower launch costs.

Major contributors include:

Communication networks (such as Starlink and OneWeb)

Weather and climate monitoring satellites

Earth-observation and mapping systems

Military and intelligence satellites

Scientific research missions

Each year, hundreds more are launched.

Why Is There So Much Space Debris

Space debris comes from decades of human activity in orbit. It includes:

Defunct satellites that no longer work

Rocket stages left behind after launches

Fragments from collisions or explosions

Paint flakes, bolts, and broken components

Some debris travels at up to 28,000 km/h, meaning even a small object can destroy a satellite on impact. This growing problem is known as the Kessler Syndrome, where collisions create more debris, leading to further collisions in a dangerous chain reaction.

Does Space Clutter Cause Radiation in the Atmosphere

This is a common concern, but it’s important to be precise.

Satellites and space debris do not create harmful radiation that affects Earth’s atmosphere. The radiation found in space — such as cosmic rays and solar radiation — is natural and has existed long before satellites. Earth’s magnetic field and atmosphere act as powerful shields, absorbing and deflecting most harmful radiation before it reaches the surface.

Satellites themselves:

Do not emit nuclear radiation

Do not increase atmospheric radiation levels

Are designed to withstand space radiation, not create it

When satellites re-enter the atmosphere, most burn up completely, leaving no radiation behind.

Are There Nuclear Weapons in Space

Despite persistent rumours, nuclear weapons are not legally or openly stationed in space.

The Outer Space Treaty of 1967, signed by major world powers including the US, UK, Russia, and China, explicitly prohibits weapons of mass destruction — including nuclear weapons — from being placed in orbit or on celestial bodies.

While some satellites serve military purposes (such as surveillance or missile-detection systems), they are not nuclear weapons. Early-warning satellites exist to detect launches, not carry warheads.

That said, concerns remain about:

Anti-satellite weapons tested from Earth

Cyberattacks targeting satellite systems

Militarisation of space technology

These are real geopolitical risks — but they are very different from nuclear weapons being hidden in orbit.

Could Space Be Used for Terror Attacks

The risk of space being used directly as a terror weapon is extremely low. Launching objects into orbit requires nation-state resources, advanced technology, and global monitoring. Space launches are tracked worldwide, making covert deployment almost impossible.

The more realistic risks involve:

Satellite disruption affecting communications or navigation

Cyber interference with space infrastructure

Debris collisions knocking out key services

These are serious concerns, but they are technological and security challenges, not apocalyptic scenarios.

The Real Problem: Sustainability of Space

The true danger is not radiation or hidden weapons — it is overcrowding and poor regulation. Without stronger international rules, debris-removal systems, and responsible satellite design, Earth’s orbit could become too dangerous to use safely.

Many scientists warn that if debris continues to grow unchecked, future generations could lose access to space entirely.

Conclusion

Earth’s orbit is crowded, and the problem of space debris is real. But claims that satellites are causing radiation in the atmosphere or hiding nuclear weapons in space are not supported by scientific or legal evidence. The real risks lie in mismanagement, militarisation tensions, and the long-term sustainability of space.

Rather than fear, what is needed now is global cooperation, transparency, and innovation to keep space safe — not just for governments and corporations, but for the planet below.

Attached is a news article regarding satellites covering space causing a problem 

https://www.discovermagazine.com/about-15-000-satellites-are-circling-earth-and-they-re-disrupting-the-sky-48550

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The UK Economy Is Failing Young People Through a Lack of Innovation and Career Development

The UK economy is increasingly being criticised for failing to provide meaningful opportunities for the younger generation. While employment figures may appear stable on the surface, a deeper look reveals a structural problem: a lack of innovation, limited career progression, and a narrow range of jobs available to young people unless they are highly educated. Even then, many graduates find themselves overqualified and underutilised.

A Cycle of Basic Employment

For many young people, the job market is dominated by low-skill, low-wage roles in retail, hospitality, delivery services, and temporary contract work. These roles often offer little training, minimal progression, and no long-term security. As a result, young workers are trapped in a cycle where they work simply to survive, rather than to develop skills or build careers.

This situation discourages ambition and weakens motivation. When young people see few pathways beyond basic employment, innovation and creativity are pushed aside in favour of short-term income.

Education No Longer Guarantees Opportunity

Higher education was once seen as the clear route to success. Today, many graduates face a harsh reality: degrees no longer guarantee access to professional or specialist roles. Entry-level positions increasingly demand years of experience, while offering wages that barely reflect the level of education required.

As a result, highly educated individuals often compete for roles far below their qualification level. This mismatch leads to frustration, wasted potential, and a workforce that is not being used effectively.

Lack of Innovation and Investment

One of the core issues is the UK’s limited investment in innovation-driven industries. Compared to other advanced economies, the UK has been slow to scale up sectors such as advanced manufacturing, green technology, artificial intelligence, and high-value digital industries in a way that directly benefits young workers.

Start-ups and small businesses face funding barriers, while large corporations often prioritise cost-cutting over long-term skill development. Without serious investment in future-focused industries, job creation remains shallow and repetitive.

Impact on Mind Development and Society

When young people are denied opportunities to think creatively, solve complex problems, and grow professionally, the effects go beyond employment. Mental stagnation, low morale, and a sense of social disengagement begin to take hold. This contributes to rising mental health concerns and a growing disconnect between young people and the economic system meant to support them.

An economy that fails to challenge and develop its workforce ultimately weakens its own future.

Conclusion

The UK economy is not suffering from a lack of talent—it is suffering from a lack of vision. Young people need access to innovative industries, meaningful training, and realistic career progression. Without structural reform, increased investment, and a serious commitment to developing minds rather than just filling roles, the cycle of basic employment will continue.

Attached is a news article regarding to many young people not getting employed in the uk 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jan/27/uk-young-people-anxious-jobs-economy

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36







Tuesday, 27 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Racial Phobia and Cultural Hostility on Social Media: A Growing Threat to Social Unity

Social media was once praised as a tool to bring people together across borders, cultures, and beliefs. Yet increasingly, it has become a breeding ground for racial phobia, cultural hostility, and religious intolerance. Online spaces are now saturated with aggressive exchanges between Black and White communities, Pakistanis and other ethnic groups, and between Muslim and Christian cultures. These hostile interactions are not just words on a screen — they are actively deepening social divisions and fuelling real-world tension.

At the heart of the problem is the rise of “fighting words” — language deliberately used to provoke, insult, and dehumanise. Social media algorithms often amplify controversial content because it generates engagement, allowing racial slurs, stereotypes, and inflammatory religious rhetoric to spread faster than calm, reasoned discussion. This creates echo chambers where anger is validated and hostility becomes normalised.

Racial phobia online frequently reduces complex histories and lived experiences into crude generalisations. Black and White communities are often pitted against each other through narratives rooted in historical trauma, systemic inequality, and resentment, but stripped of context and empathy. Similarly, Pakistanis and other South Asian groups are routinely targeted with racist tropes that portray entire communities as threats rather than as diverse human beings.

Religious tension adds another dangerous layer. Social media debates between Muslim and Christian users often shift from theological disagreement into outright hostility, with faith weaponised as a tool for mockery or moral superiority. What should be respectful dialogue about belief systems instead becomes a battleground where identity itself is attacked. This not only alienates individuals but also reinforces the false idea that cultures and religions must exist in conflict.

The consequences extend far beyond the digital world. Online racial and religious hostility influences how people perceive one another in workplaces, schools, and neighbourhoods. It contributes to rising hate crimes, mistrust between communities, and the erosion of social cohesion. Young people, in particular, are vulnerable, as constant exposure to hostile narratives can shape their worldview and normalise intolerance.

Responsibility does not lie with individuals alone. Social media companies must take stronger action to moderate hate-driven content, rather than allowing profit-driven algorithms to reward outrage. Governments and institutions must invest in digital literacy, teaching users how to engage critically, verify information, and communicate without dehumanising others.

Ultimately, addressing racial phobia and cultural hostility requires a collective shift. Disagreement is inevitable in diverse societies, but hatred is not. Respectful dialogue, empathy, and accountability must replace insult and provocation. If social media continues to be a space dominated by racial and religious hostility, the damage to society will deepen. But if it is reclaimed as a platform for understanding rather than division, it can still fulfil its original promise of connection.

Attached is a news article regarding racial segregation on social media 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgl21053rdzo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36







Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Why Cousin Marriage Is Common in Somalia

Cousin marriage has long been a feature of Somali society, and while figures vary, studies and demographic surveys often suggest that a majority of marriages in Somalia involve relatives, frequently first or second cousins. Estimates commonly cited range from 60–70%, though exact numbers differ by region and methodology. The reasons behind this practice are deeply rooted in culture, history, economics, and social structure, rather than religion alone.

Strong Clan and Family Structures

Somali society is traditionally organised around clans and extended family networks. Marriage within the family helps strengthen clan unity, preserve alliances, and maintain trust between relatives. In a society where the family is the primary safety net, marrying a cousin is often seen as a way to keep loyalty and resources within the group.

Economic Security and Stability

In a country that has faced decades of conflict, displacement, and limited state infrastructure, marriage is not only a personal choice but an economic strategy. Marrying a relative can:

Reduce bridewealth (mahr) disputes

Ensure land, livestock, or property stays within the family

Provide financial security for women through known and trusted relatives

For many families, cousin marriage is viewed as a practical decision in uncertain conditions.

Trust and Familiarity

Families often believe that marrying within the family reduces risks such as mistreatment, abandonment, or incompatibility. Since relatives already know each other’s background, behaviour, and values, cousin marriage is seen as safer and more predictable than marrying a stranger.

Cultural Tradition, Not a Religious Requirement

While Islam permits cousin marriage, it does not encourage or require it. The high prevalence in Somalia is largely cultural rather than religious. Many Muslim-majority countries have far lower rates of cousin marriage, showing that the practice is shaped more by local customs than faith.

Rural Life and Limited Social Mixing

In rural and pastoral communities, social circles are often small. Opportunities to meet unrelated partners can be limited, making marriage within the extended family more common and socially accepted.

Changing Attitudes and Health Awareness

In recent years, particularly among urban Somalis and the diaspora, attitudes are shifting. Increased education and awareness of the genetic risks associated with close-relative marriages have led some families to reconsider the practice. Younger generations are increasingly choosing partners outside their immediate family, especially where education and healthcare access are better.

A Complex Social Reality

It is important to understand that cousin marriage in Somalia is not about coercion or ignorance, but about survival, tradition, and social cohesion in a challenging environment. Like many long-standing cultural practices, it is now being debated and reassessed as Somali society continues to change.

High prevalence: Studies estimate around 60–70% of marriages in Somalia involve cousins, often first cousins.

Clan-based society: Strong clan and extended family systems encourage marriage within the family to preserve unity and loyalty.

Economic security: Cousin marriage helps keep wealth, land, and livestock within families and reduces financial disputes.

Trust and familiarity: Families prefer known relatives, believing it lowers risks of abuse, abandonment, or incompatibility.

Cultural, not religious: Islam allows cousin marriage but does not require it; the practice is driven mainly by tradition.

Limited partner choice: Rural life and small social networks reduce opportunities to meet unrelated partners.

Historical instability: Decades of conflict and weak state systems make family networks the main source of protection.

Changing attitudes: Urban communities and the Somali diaspora show declining support, influenced by education and health awareness.

Health concerns: Growing recognition of genetic risks is prompting debate and gradual change.

Conclusion

Cousin marriage in Somalia is best understood as a product of deep-rooted cultural traditions, strong clan structures, and practical responses to economic and social uncertainty, rather than religion alone. For generations, it has been seen as a way to preserve trust, protect family resources, and maintain social stability in a country shaped by conflict and limited state support. However, as education improves, healthcare awareness grows, and urbanisation increases, attitudes are gradually changing. While the practice remains common, especially in rural areas, ongoing discussion within Somali communities reflects a society balancing tradition with modern health and social considerations.

Attached is a news article regarding 70% Somali people marrying there cousins in there country 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNqA5c_v6Bf/?igsh=MTcyM2I2MWgwcmRseg==

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTROl84Dcx0/?igsh=NmNmOGlkenN3cGk3

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1372762567555353&set=a.196372465194375&id=100044648674230

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36







Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump’s Immigration Crackdown: What’s Happening with U.S. Visas and Indian Applicants

In early 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration introduced some of the strictest immigration and visa measures in recent American history. While there is no blanket ban specifically stopping all Indians from applying for U.S. visas, the combined effect of multiple new policies has created significant hurdles for Indian citizens seeking to work, study, or settle in the United States.  

What Did the Trump Administration Announce

On January 14, 2026, the U.S. government announced an indefinite pause on immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries, citing concerns about applicants becoming a “public charge” (i.e. relying on government support).  

This pause does not include non-immigrant visas — such as student (F-1), temporary work (H-1B), or tourist (B1/B2) visas — for most countries.  

India, critically, is not on the list of the 75 countries targeted by this immigration visa suspension.  

However, this policy is part of a broader suite of restrictive measures that affect Indian applicants in serious ways.

 Broader Visa Impacts on Indian Applicants

 Students Facing New Barriers

Many Indian students — especially those planning to pursue higher education — have expressed alarm at the changing landscape:

Uncertainty around visa approvals has forced some families to reconsider or postpone plans to study in the U.S. entirely.  

Even though student visas are technically still available, lengthy backlogs, heightened scrutiny, and fears of denial are deterring applicants.  

 Tech Workers and H-1B Uncertainty

The administration’s stance toward work visas has also changed:

There are reports of H-1B interview slots being pushed out to 2027, severely delaying renewal or stamping for many Indian tech professionals.  

Previous policy tweaks — including plans to scrutinize applicants’ social media and professional histories — add extra barriers, particularly for those in online safety or tech roles.  

Though not a ban, these changes create de facto obstacles that make it harder for Indian nationals to secure work visas or travel as scheduled.

 What Is and Isn’t Affected

Here’s a clearer breakdown:

Still open for Indian applicants:

Non-immigrant visas: student (F-1), work (H-1B), tourist (B1/B2) are technically still being processed.  

Paused or complicated:

Green cards and permanent immigration pathways in many cases face slowdowns or stricter vetting — though India is not formally on the paused list.  

H-1B visa appointments are experiencing severe backlogs and delays.  

So while Indian nationals are not outright banned from applying for U.S. visas, the environment has become much more restrictive, uncertain, and difficult to navigate.

 Reactions from India and Around the World

These visa policy shifts have sparked:

Concern among Indian students and professionals, with some reconsidering the U.S. as a study or work destination.  

Debate among immigration analysts, who argue that visa backlogs and new scrutiny protocols are discouraging legal migration even where visas are technically available.  

Criticism from employers in the U.S. who rely on skilled Indian workers (especially in tech) and fear talent shortages due to stricter visa access.

 What This Means Going Forward

For Indians considering travel, work, or study in the United States:

Be prepared for delays and extra documentation requirements. Even legitimate applications may take much longer than in past years.  

Monitor policy updates carefully. U.S. immigration policy continues to evolve rapidly under the current administration, and further changes could impact eligibility or processing timelines.

Consider alternatives. With the UK and other countries becoming more competitive destinations for international students and professionals, some applicants are shifting focus.  

In Summary

 No direct ban currently stops all Indians from applying for U.S. visas.

 A major pause on immigrant visas for 75 countries does not include India.

 But visa processing delays, tight backlogs, scrutiny, and policy uncertainty are having a real impact on Indian students and skilled workers.

 The broader environment feels far more hostile and unpredictable compared with the past decade — shaping perceptions of the U.S. as a destination for opportunity.

Attached is a news article regarding Indian's being able to apply for visas in America 

https://www.ndtv.com/travel/us-tightens-visa-rules-indian-travellers-to-face-longer-waiting-times-9235772/amp/1

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

A Single Kiss Can Transfer Tens of Millions of Bacteria, Scientists Say

A simple kiss may feel harmless, even romantic, but scientists say it can involve the transfer of tens of millions of bacteria between two people in just a matter of seconds.

According to research into the human oral microbiome, an average mouth contains more than 700 different species of bacteria. While many of these microbes are beneficial and help with digestion and immune defence, others can contribute to tooth decay, gum disease and infections. When two people kiss—especially a prolonged, open-mouth kiss—large quantities of saliva are exchanged, allowing bacteria to move easily from one mouth to another.

Studies estimate that a 10-second kiss can transfer up to 80 million bacteria between partners. Researchers have found that couples who kiss frequently tend to have more similar oral bacteria than those who do not, showing how quickly and effectively microbes can spread through intimate contact.

Despite how alarming the number sounds, scientists stress that this bacterial exchange is usually not dangerous. In fact, exposure to a partner’s bacteria can help strengthen the immune system by introducing new, harmless microbes. Problems are more likely when one person has poor oral hygiene or an active infection, such as gum disease, cold sores, or certain viruses, which can be passed on more easily through saliva.

Dentists recommend maintaining good oral health to reduce risks. Regular brushing, flossing, and dental check-ups help control harmful bacteria levels and lower the chance of transmitting oral infections through kissing.

Experts also note that kissing has well-documented benefits. It releases hormones like oxytocin and dopamine, which reduce stress, strengthen emotional bonds, and improve overall wellbeing. For most people, the health benefits far outweigh the microbial risks.

In short, while a kiss can swap tens of millions of bacteria, it is usually a natural and harmless part of human interaction—and one that plays a role in both emotional and biological connection.

Attached is a news article regarding ten of million of bacteria can be swapped between two people over one deep kiss via the tongues 

https://www.hunimed.eu/news/80-million-bacteria-exchanged-kiss/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

DigDat Jailed for 24 Years Over Attempted Murder of LuGavellz

UK drill rapper DigDat has been sentenced to 24 years in prison after being convicted of the attempted murder of fellow rapper LuGavellz, in a case that has sent shockwaves through the music industry and wider community.

The court heard that the attack was deliberate and planned, posing a serious risk to life and highlighting the growing problem of violent rivalries spilling out of the streets and into public life. Prosecutors argued that the actions demonstrated extreme disregard for human life, leaving the victim lucky to survive.

During sentencing, the judge described the offence as exceptionally serious, stressing that the length of the sentence reflected both the severity of the crime and the need to protect the public. The court also pointed to the wider impact of such violence, particularly on young people who may view artists as role models.

LuGavellz survived the attack, but the case has reignited debate around violence within the UK drill scene, with critics arguing that ongoing feuds, social media provocation, and the glamorisation of aggression continue to fuel real-world harm.

DigDat, once seen as one of the most promising talents in UK drill, now faces spending a significant portion of his life behind bars. The case stands as a stark reminder that success and fame do not place anyone above the law, and that violent actions carry life-changing consequences for all involved.

Attached is a news article regarding dig dat sentence to 24 years for the attempted murder of lugavellz 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgzpmez7zno.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36






Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Powerful Storm Batters the UK, Bringing Disruption and Warnings Nationwide

The UK has been hit by a powerful storm system, bringing heavy rain, strong winds and widespread disruption across much of the country. Forecasters have warned that the storm could continue to cause travel chaos, flooding and power outages as it moves eastward.

Gusts of wind have reached dangerous speeds in coastal and highland areas, forcing the closure of bridges, ferry routes and some rail services. Fallen trees and debris have blocked roads, while emergency services have urged the public to avoid unnecessary journeys.

Heavy rainfall has raised concerns over flooding, particularly in low-lying and already saturated areas. Several rivers are close to bursting their banks, with flood alerts and warnings issued by the Environment Agency. Residents in vulnerable regions have been advised to prepare sandbags and move valuables to higher ground where possible.

Air travel has also been affected, with delays and cancellations reported at major airports due to strong crosswinds. Schools in some areas have closed as a precaution, while local councils have activated emergency response plans to support affected communities.

Power companies are working to restore electricity supplies after thousands of homes experienced outages caused by fallen power lines. Engineers remain on standby as further damage is expected while the storm persists.

The Met Office has urged people to stay indoors where possible, secure loose outdoor items, and check on elderly or vulnerable neighbours. Motorists are advised to drive with extreme caution due to poor visibility, surface water and strong gusts.

While storms of this nature are not uncommon during the winter months, experts say changing climate patterns are increasing the intensity and unpredictability of extreme weather events. Authorities continue to monitor the situation closely and have stressed the importance of following official weather updates and safety guidance.

Attached is a news article regarding storm Chandra 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8p2yey0gdo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Northern Ireland to Introduce Major Changes for New Drivers in 2026

Belfast, Northern Ireland – 27 January 2026: Northern Ireland’s Department for Infrastructure has announced the most significant overhaul of the driver licensing system in almost 70 years, with a new Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) scheme set to take effect on 1 October 2026.  

The reforms aim to improve road safety by giving new drivers — especially the youngest — a more structured period of training and supervision before and after they pass their driving test. This comes in response to road collision statistics showing that young drivers are disproportionately involved in serious and fatal crashes.  

Structured Learning: A Six-Month Minimum Training Period

Under GDL, learner drivers must now complete a mandatory minimum six-month training period before they can book a practical driving test. During this time, learners will follow a certified Programme of Training, and record their progress in a logbook signed off by either an approved instructor or a supervising driver.  

This structured approach seeks to ensure learners gain real experience behind the wheel — not just enough to pass a test — before driving independently.  

New Rules After Passing: ‘R’ Plates and Restrictions

Once a learner successfully passes their practical driving test, they’ll enter a post-test period with additional safeguards:

New drivers will display a newly introduced ‘R’ plate for recognition on the roads.  

The period for such restrictions will be extended from the previous 12 months to 24 months.  

Drivers under 24 face new night-time and passenger restrictions during their first six months on the road. They may only carry one passenger aged 14–20 between 23:00 and 06:00, unless accompanied by a family member or an experienced driver (at least 21 years old with three years’ licence).  

These measures are designed to reduce the risks associated with late-night driving and peer distractions — factors known to contribute to collisions involving newly qualified drivers.  

Motorway Driving and Speed Limits

One of the more welcomed changes for many learners is the removal of the old 45 mph maximum speed limit for both learner and restricted drivers.  

Learners will also be allowed to drive on motorways while accompanied by an approved driving instructor. Once they’ve passed their test and are displaying their R plates, they may drive on motorways at the posted speed limit — a big shift from previous restrictions.  

Penalties for Breaking the New Rules

New drivers who fail to comply with the GDL restrictions — such as the night-time or passenger limits — could soon face penalty points or fines up to £1,000 if caught by police.  

These enforcement measures are intended to reinforce the importance of the new regime and encourage safer driving habits early in a driver’s career. 

What This Means for Prospective Drivers

For anyone planning to start learning to drive in Northern Ireland over the next year, the introduction of GDL means:

Expect a minimum six-month learning period before booking a practical test.  

Ensure you keep a training logbook with all required modules completed.  

After passing, look out for new R plates and follow post-test rules strictly.  

Officials say a public information campaign will launch ahead of the October 2026 start date to help learners, instructors and motorists understand all the changes well in advance.  

Looking Ahead

Transport Minister Liz Kimmins described the GDL reforms as a major step toward safer roads and better-prepared drivers, noting that nearly one-quarter of fatal collisions involve drivers aged 17–23 even though they make up less than one-tenth of licence holders.  

Whether these changes will affect insurance costs — already a key concern for young drivers — remains to be seen, but the government’s focus is clear: safer, more confident drivers behind the wheel from day one.

Attached is a news article regarding changes for new drivers in Northern Ireland 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cew87q890pyo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


Monday, 26 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

When Data Breaches Become Personal Attacks: DVLA Licences, Court Records and the Corrosion of Trust

In an increasingly digital era, our lives are written into databases — from driving licences to court records. But when these systems are misused, whether through criminal hacks, scams, or gross negligence, the consequences can ripple outwards, damaging individuals’ lives and eroding confidence in public institutions.

The Value — and Vulnerability — of Official Data

Entities like the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) hold personal details on nearly every driver in the UK. This includes name, address, date of birth, licence number, and details of endorsements or convictions that determine whether someone can legally drive. It’s a rich target for criminals: with enough data, identity theft, fraud, and even false prosecution become possible.

Scammers are already exploiting this. Fraudulent offers circulating on platforms like TikTok and WhatsApp promise learners a driving licence “without tests” or with “inside access” — often for hundreds of pounds. Not only are these licences fake, but victims who hand over personal details risk identity theft and financial loss. Any resulting documents, even if convincing, are unlawful and can expose them to criminal charges.  

When Official Records Are Altered: From Scam to Crime

Altering a driving licence or court record isn’t merely deception — it’s a criminal offence under UK law. The Data Protection Act 2018 and GDPR make clear that personal data must be securely processed and not changed or disclosed without lawful authority. Misuse of public systems — whether by hacking, corruption, or exploitation of weak controls — can lead to identity theft, unjust penalties, wrongful convictions, and financial or emotional harm to victims.

There are reported instances on community forums where individuals claim their licence information has been changed without their consent, and that this has blocked them from accessing DVLA services such as a check code. This kind of misuse isn’t common, but it highlights how damaging it can be when personal databases are tampered with — leaving victims stuck in bureaucratic limbo and exposed to further exploitation.  

Court Systems: Rising Data Breaches and Risk of Misuse

It isn’t just driver licensing systems that are struggling with data protection. The UK’s digital court system has seen a surge in breaches of sensitive information. Between 2023 and 2024 more than 10,000 personal data breaches were recorded, often because confidential documents were uploaded to the wrong case files or mishandled by staff or third parties. This exposes sensitive details of litigants, victims, witnesses, or defendants — fuel for doxxing, fraud, or manipulation.  

When court records or driving histories are exposed and fall into malicious hands, it opens the door to fraudsters creating counterfeit notices, falsifying charges, or even convincing victims they need to pay fines or attend bogus hearings — tactics we’ve seen in phishing campaigns targeting vehicle owners.  

Why These Breaches Matter

These issues affect individuals in several direct ways:

 Personal Identity Theft and Fraud

Data leaked or harvested from official systems can be used to open bank accounts, take loans, or commit financial crimes in someone’s name.

 Risk of Wrongful Penalties

Fake fines or prosecutions based on altered records can lead victims into the criminal justice system without cause, or see them pay fines they never actually incurred.

 Legal and Financial Damage

Manipulated driving records can result in wrongful disqualification, increased insurance premiums, or loss of livelihood — particularly for professional drivers.

 Institutional Trust Erosion

When citizens feel that government databases are insecure, their trust in public services falls — and that can have broader democratic consequences.

Protecting Yourself and the System

✔️ Always use official channels.

DVLA and court services communicate via official GOV.UK domains — never trust unsolicited links or emails.  

✔️ Report suspicious activity.

If you suspect your personal data has been compromised, contact Action Fraud and the police immediately.

✔️ Monitor official records.

Check your driving licence, credit file, and any court records regularly for unexpected changes.

✔️ Stronger legal safeguards.

Experts and civil society groups are calling for better enforcement of data protection laws and harsher penalties for those who unlawfully access or manipulate official databases.

A Call to Action

Data breaches and corrupted attacks on personal information are not abstract cybersecurity problems — they are real threats to individuals, justice, and society in the UK. Whether driven by criminal profit or systemic failures in data handling, unauthorised changes to DVLA records or court systems must be taken seriously by authorities and the public alike.

Safeguarding these systems, improving transparency around breaches, and offering support to victims isn’t just good practice — it’s essential to uphold the rule of law and protect the fundamental rights of every citizen.

Attached is a news article regarding the DVLA corruption scandal over a data breach on individuals driving license and court details being changed 

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2022/jun/25/parking-fines-dvla-law-drivers-details-claims

https://www.facebook.com/bbcwatchdog/posts/tonight-on-bbc-ones-watchdog-we-continue-our-story-on-the-dvla-data-breach/1287633051421750/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

NHS Negligence in the UK: A Growing Concern for Patients and the Health Service

The National Health Service (NHS) is one of the pillars of British society — providing largely free care at the point of need and serving millions of people every year. Yet, like all large health systems, it is not immune to failures. Clinical negligence — where a patient suffers avoidable harm as a result of substandard healthcare — remains a significant problem with far-reaching human and financial consequences.

What Is NHS Negligence

In legal terms, medical or clinical negligence occurs when a healthcare provider breaches the duty of care owed to a patient and that breach causes harm or injury. This can include diagnosis errors, treatment failures, surgical mistakes, missed follow-ups, and lack of informed consent. Patients harmed by such failings have the right to seek compensation and redress under UK law, including through frameworks like the NHS Redress Act 2006.  

Human Stories: Tragedies Behind the Statistics

Negligence is not just a legal abstraction — it represents real suffering.

Recently, a newborn baby died just three days after birth following alleged failings in maternity care where early infection signs were not acted on in time. Hospital investigations found critical observations were missed.  

In another case, a 48-year-old woman’s cancer went undetected due to a bungled smear test, delaying diagnosis until the condition became incurable. The hospital admitted the error and the family pursued compensation.  

A 20-year-old man died from a rapidly worsening bacterial infection following multiple misdiagnoses and missed red-flag symptoms across NHS services, prompting an ongoing inquest into how he was assessed and treated.  

These cases underscore the very real human cost of systemic and individual clinical failures.

Scale of the Problem: Rising Costs and Claims

Negligence claims against the NHS have been climbing in recent years — both in number and monetary value.

In the 2023–24 financial year, NHS Resolution reported that the health service paid out a record £2.8 billion in clinical negligence costs, with total expected liabilities reaching far higher when future claims are taken into account.  

Latest figures for 2024–25 show approximately £3.1 billion paid in compensation and associated costs, with maternal and obstetric injuries accounting for a substantial share of these payouts.  

Independent analyses suggest NHS clinical negligence liabilities now stretch into tens of billions of pounds, making it one of the largest government financial obligations outside areas like nuclear decommissioning.  

Across England and Wales, individual NHS trusts have paid millions in settlements for negligence claims, ranging from orthopaedic trusts paying under £1 million to some large hospital trusts paying tens of millions annually.  

Common Causes and Patterns

Several recurring issues appear in clinical negligence cases:

Failed or delayed diagnoses remain one of the most common reasons patients bring claims.  

Maternity care failings account for a disproportionate share of payout values due to the severity of outcomes when things go wrong.  

Operational and procedural errors — known as “never events” — such as wrong-side surgery or incorrect patient procedures — still occur in NHS settings.  

Systemic Challenges Behind Negligence

While individual errors occur, systemic pressures also shape risk:

1. Understaffing and Resource Constraints

The NHS operates under chronic workforce shortages, especially in nursing and specialist services, which can increase stress on staff and reduce time spent on careful clinical assessment.

2. Culture and Patient Safety

Experts argue that a stronger patient safety culture — where staff can report near misses and learn from errors without fear — is essential to reducing harm. Yet progress on building such a culture remains uneven.  

3. Training and Oversight

Cases such as prolonged periods of poor performance by clinicians before intervention by management highlight gaps in oversight and early-warning systems.  

Legal and Ethical Dimensions

Negligence law in the UK balances the rights of patients to redress with protections for clinicians acting in good faith. High-profile cases such as the Hadiza Bawa-Garba case — where a doctor was prosecuted for gross negligence before appeal restored her medical registration — have sparked debate about individual culpability versus systemic failings.  

The legal framework aims to ensure injured patients receive compensation while also seeking to embed learning and prevention in the system.

Moving Forward: Reform and Accountability

There is ongoing scrutiny from Parliament and healthcare watchdogs over rising negligence costs and what this means for patient safety and NHS finances. MPs have urged the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England to act on rising costs and strengthen preventive measures.  

Efforts include:

Sharing lessons from claims to improve national clinical guidelines.

Strengthening patient safety reporting frameworks.

Investing in training, staffing, and safer clinical pathways.

Conclusion: Balancing Care and Accountability

The NHS remains a vital public service relied upon by millions. Yet the scale and severity of medical negligence — from avoidable deaths to catastrophic diagnostic errors — highlight persistent challenges in delivering wholly safe care. As costs soar and stories of tragedy emerge, the NHS must confront not just how it compensates for harm but how it fundamentally prevents harm in the first place.

Attached is a news article regarding NHS negligence in the uk 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/oct/17/nhs-medical-negligence-liabilities-hit-60bn-amid-surge-in-maternity-payouts

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Shooting Incident Reported at DJ AG Event Involving Rapper Giggs A violent incident was repo...