Monday, 20 October 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

How British Life Has Changed: From the 1950s to Today

Britain has undergone remarkable social, cultural, and technological transformations over the past seven decades. From post-war austerity to the digital revolution, each decade has reshaped the way people live, work, and connect. Here’s a look at how British life has evolved decade by decade — from the 1950s to the 2020s.

1950s – Rebuilding and Renewal

The 1950s were marked by recovery from the devastation of the Second World War. Cities were rebuilding, rationing finally ended in 1954, and families began to enjoy new household luxuries like televisions, washing machines, and cars. The sense of community was strong — neighbours looked out for each other, and entertainment was often local, centred around pubs, dances, and the newly popular BBC broadcasts.

The rise of rock and roll, spearheaded by artists like Cliff Richard and Elvis Presley, symbolised a new youth culture beginning to emerge. Britain was slowly shifting from a world of hardship to one of hope and modernity.

1960s – The Swinging Sixties

The 1960s brought an explosion of creativity, freedom, and change. London became a cultural capital of the world — “Swinging London” — with icons like The BeatlesThe Rolling Stones, and fashion designers such as Mary Quant defining a new era.

Social attitudes began to shift dramatically. The introduction of the contraceptive pill, the abolition of the death penalty, and the legalisation of homosexuality marked major milestones in personal freedom. Immigration from Commonwealth countries also began to shape the nation’s identity, laying the foundation for today’s multicultural Britain.

1970s – Strikes, Style, and Social Strain

The 1970s were a decade of contrast — a time of both economic hardship and cultural boldness. Britain faced power cuts, high inflation, and widespread strikes during what became known as the “Winter of Discontent.” Yet, while the economy struggled, British music and fashion flourished.

Punk rock, led by The Sex Pistols and The Clash, challenged authority and expressed working-class anger. Meanwhile, disco and glam rock brought colour and escapism. Women’s rights gained momentum, with the Equal Pay Act (1970) and Sex Discrimination Act (1975) signalling a push toward gender equality.

1980s – Thatcherism and Technology

The 1980s defined a new political and economic era. Under Margaret Thatcher’s government, Britain embraced free-market policies, privatisation, and reduced union power. While the economy modernised, traditional industries such as coal mining and steel declined, leaving lasting scars in working-class communities.

Technology began to change everyday life — the personal computer, home video recorders, and the first mobile phones appeared. Music television (MTV) and icons like Madonna and Duran Duran shaped pop culture. The decade ended with optimism as Britain’s financial and media industries boomed.

1990s – Cool Britannia and Globalisation

The 1990s were a time of confidence and connectivity. Tony Blair’s New Labour promised modernisation and inclusivity, while “Cool Britannia” celebrated British creativity in fashion, art, and music. OasisBlur, and the Spice Girls dominated the airwaves, defining a new pop culture identity.

The internet began to emerge, slowly changing how people communicated. Mobile phones became more common, and globalisation connected Britain to the wider world. The Good Friday Agreement in 1998 brought relative peace to Northern Ireland, signalling a new era of stability.

2000s – The Digital Revolution

The early 2000s saw the birth of the digital age. Broadband internet, smartphones, and social media transformed communication and culture. Platforms like FacebookYouTube, and later Twitter changed how people interacted, shared news, and even how they viewed fame and politics.

The 9/11 attacks in 2001 and the Iraq War deeply affected British politics and society, sparking protests and debates about global responsibility. Reality TV shows like Big Brother and The X Factor captured national attention, and celebrity culture became dominant.

2010s – A Connected but Divided Britain

The 2010s were shaped by political turbulence and rapid technological progress. Austerity measures following the 2008 financial crisis reshaped public services, while Brexit divided the nation and redefined Britain’s relationship with Europe.

The rise of smartphones made social media central to daily life, influencing everything from fashion to politics. Movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter sparked important social debates, while streaming services revolutionised entertainment. Britain became increasingly diverse — but also increasingly divided. 

2020s – Crisis, Change, and Uncertainty

The 2020s have so far been dominated by upheaval. The COVID-19 pandemic transformed work, healthcare, and social life, normalising remote work and highlighting the importance of community. Political debates over cost of living, housing, and climate change continue to shape public life.

Technology now permeates every aspect of existence — artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, and digital currencies are redefining what it means to live in modern Britain. Yet amid all the progress, nostalgia for simpler times remains strong.

Conclusion

From post-war rationing to AI-driven innovation, British life has transformed beyond recognition. Each decade brought its own challenges and triumphs — from rebuilding a nation to reinventing how people communicate, create, and connect.

Today’s Britain is a reflection of all those eras — a society rooted in tradition but constantly adapting to change.

Attached is a news article regarding how life in the uk has changed Decade by decade from 1950-1980 to now 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/may/20/gender.britishidentity

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Background & context

A number of jurisdictions are now moving to prohibit marriage between first cousins (i.e., two people whose parents are siblings).

For example, in the U.K., the Marriage (Prohibited Degrees of Relationship) Bill was introduced in the House of Commons (sponsored by Richard Holden) in 2024/2025 with the aim of outlawing first-cousin marriages.  

In the U.S., the state of Connecticut passed a bill specifically named AN ACT PROHIBITING FIRST COUSIN MARRIAGE (Bill HB-6918) which adds a provision that “on and after October 1, 2025, no person may knowingly marry such person’s first cousin.”  

As of 2025, research indicates that first‐cousin marriage laws vary widely among U.S. states — some ban it outright, some allow it with conditions, others permit it fully.  

Thus, the current article addresses “the government’s new bill to ban cousins from getting married,” in a context of one such proposed or enacted measure (depending on jurisdiction). I’ll treat it generically (though many details below refer to the Connecticut / UK style model) and discuss motivations, implications and concerns.

What does the bill propose

In essence, the bill seeks to add “first cousins” to the list of prohibited relationships for legal marriage. Key features generally include:

A statutory prohibition: persons who are first cousins would be ineligible to obtain a marriage licence (or their marriage would be void).

A specified effective date (for example, in Connecticut the law takes effect 1 October 2025).  

The language often uses phrases like “no person may knowingly marry such person’s first cousin.”  

The law typically does not penalise existing marriages, or it includes grandfathering provisions (in Connecticut, the bill states it did not want to jeopardise marriages that occurred when legal).  

The prohibition may be only on marriage, not necessarily sexual relations or cohabitation (depending on the jurisdiction). In CT, the law bans the marriage licence but does not criminalise relations.  

Thus the practical upshot: once the law is in force, first‐cousins cannot legally marry under that jurisdiction’s married persons law.


Why is this bill being introduced

Several motivations (some overlapping) are cited in favour:

1. Health/genetic concerns

One of the most-commonly offered rationales is that procreation between first cousins increases the risk of recessive genetic disorders, birth defects, infant mortality, etc. For example, Connecticut legislators pointed to “science shows that procreation between first cousins increases the chances of birth defects.”  

Supporters argue that banning cousin marriage is a public‐health measure.

2. Aligning legal norms / remedying “outlier” status

Some jurisdictions note they are one of the few remaining places where first‐cousin marriage is allowed, so the law is introduced to align with the majority or with what lawmakers perceive as accepted norms. In Connecticut, for instance, one legislator said: “we looked at it and saw we were sort of an outlier state that didn’t ban it.”  

3. Social / cultural arguments

Some of the commentary goes beyond genetics to argue that first‐cousin marriages may raise issues of family loyalty, insularity, nepotism, or weakening of broader social bonds. For example, one article argues that consanguineous marriage may undermine trust and civic institutions.  

4. Legal clarity

In some legal systems, sibling/parent/ancestor marriages are banned, but cousins have been omitted. Legislators argue the law needs to fill the gap. For example: “State law already explicitly bans marriage to a person’s parent, grandparent, child, … and the bill adds cousin.”  


What are the arguments against the bill?

There are significant objections and caveats raised by critics.

1. Civil liberties and personal autonomy

Some say the government should not dictate whom people may love and marry. For example, an MP in the U.K. argued the matter should be treated as a health‐awareness issue rather than legislative prohibition.  

2. Cultural sensitivity

In many communities (immigrant or traditional populations) first‐cousin marriages are culturally accepted, and banning them may be seen as stigmatising or targeting particular groups. As one charity pointed out, such laws could discourage affected individuals from seeking help.  

3. Enforceability and unintended consequences

Critics argue that enforcement may be difficult (how do you ascertain cousin-relationship in all cases?), and that banning such marriages may push them underground (leading to fewer legal protections for spouses). The law might lead to unintended consequences, such as marriages performed abroad then moved back, or people circumventing the restrictions.  

4. Overemphasis on one risk while larger issues exist

Some commentators argue that although there is an increased risk of genetic disorders, the magnitude may be small and overshadowed by other public-health risks (e.g., poverty, access to healthcare). Addressing root causes (genetic counselling, education) might be more effective than an outright ban.  

Potential implications and questions

Here are some of the practical and legal implications of such a ban:

Legal/administrative

Marriage licenses: Officials must now check family‐relationship disclosures to ensure first cousins are not marrying.

Recognition across jurisdictions: If one state bans cousin marriage and another allows it, there may be questions about recognition of out-of-state marriages (though many states already have rules).

Existing marriages: The law must clarify whether previously valid marriages remain valid, or whether they become void. Some bills explicitly avoid retroactive invalidation.  

Penalties / compliance: Many such laws simply render the marriage void rather than criminalise the parties. In Connecticut’s case the law includes “no penalties” for consensual relations.  

Social/cultural

Stigma and community reactions: For communities where cousin marriage has been common, a ban may generate push-back, concerns about discrimination, or cases of non-compliance.

Health outcomes: If enforced effectively and combined with public health measures (genetic screening, counselling), supporters might argue the ban will reduce certain birth‐defects. But the actual magnitude of effect could be modest and indirect.

Equity issues: There may be questions about how the law affects different cultural or socioeconomic groups differently, and if there is a fair process for education and support.

Philosophical and normative

Role of the state: Is marriage regulation appropriately used to limit relationships between consenting adults on the basis of genetic risk?

Precedent and slippery slope: Some critics worry that if first cousins are banned, what about second cousins, or other degrees of kinship; does it lead to deeper intrusions?

Balancing rights and welfare: The tension between individual autonomy (the right to marry) and societal interest (reducing health risk) is at the core of the debate.


Case spotlight: Connecticut

To illustrate concretely, the law in Connecticut gives a useful case study.

The bill (HB-6918) states: “On and after October 1, 2025, no person may knowingly marry such person’s first cousin.”  

The law passed amid bipartisan agreement: legislators from both major parties supported it.  

The stated reasoning includes that Connecticut was an outlier (among states) still allowing first-cousin marriage, and that scientific evidence of increased birth defects exists.  

The law deliberately avoids penalising marital relations (i.e., it’s not criminalising the relationship) and includes a non-penalty regime for previous marriages.  

Once in force, couples who are first cousins seeking a marriage licence in Connecticut will be turned away (based on the statute).

My analysis: benefits, limitations & what to watch

Benefits

The ban provides legal clarity, aligning the statute with what many consider to be public-interest norms in terms of genetic risk.

It may serve as a symbolic signal that the state is addressing health and social concerns linked to consanguineous marriage.

For couples unaware of the risks, the law might prompt genetic counselling and increased awareness (if paired with outreach).

Limitations

The actual risk reduction may be limited — while first‐cousin marriages do carry higher risk of certain genetic conditions, the absolute incidence is comparatively low in many populations.

Enforcement and compliance could be challenging: how do authorities reliably determine cousin relationships (especially in complex family trees, blended families, immigrant communities)?

If people simply marry abroad or circumvent the law, the benefits might erode and legal protections (for spouses, children) could suffer.

There is a risk of cultural backlash or perceptions of discrimination; and the law’s implementation will need to be sensitive to community concerns and ensure adequate education rather than simple prohibition.

What to watch

Implementation: Are marriage‐licensing offices given clear guidance? Are there mechanisms to verify sibling/vs cousin relationships?

Public health infrastructure: Is there parallel investment in genetic counselling, education, and support services for communities where cousin marriage has been common?

Recognition of out‐of‐state/foreign marriages: Will the jurisdiction recognise cousin marriages done elsewhere? Will there be litigation over recognition?

Monitoring outcomes: Will the government assess whether the law actually reduces adverse health outcomes, or whether unintended consequences (underground marriages, fewer legal protections) emerge?

Broader cultural effect: How are affected communities responding? Is the law sparking constructive outreach or opposition? 

Attached is a news article regarding the new government bill to stop cousin getting married 

https://www.economist.com/britain/2025/06/26/the-culture-wars-are-coming-for-cousin-marriage-in-britain

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smielband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Donald Trump Unveils Proposal for a $250 Bill Featuring His Face

In a move that has sparked widespread debate across political and economic circles, former U.S. President Donald Trump has reportedly proposed the creation of a new $250 bill featuring his own likeness. The idea, which Trump discussed during a rally in Texas over the weekend, was framed as both a patriotic gesture and a “symbol of American greatness.”

Trump told supporters that the introduction of a $250 note would “modernize” U.S. currency and commemorate what he called “the most successful administration in American history.” According to his remarks, the bill would bear his portrait on the front and an image of the White House on the back. “It’s time we put real leaders on our money again,” Trump said to roaring applause from his audience.

While Trump’s supporters hailed the idea as a bold and symbolic tribute, critics called it a publicity stunt and questioned its legality. Under U.S. law, only the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve have authority to issue or redesign currency — a process that typically involves years of planning, historical research, and design testing.

Economists were quick to point out that the denomination itself would be highly unconventional. The United States currently issues paper currency in denominations up to $100, with larger bills ($500, $1,000, $5,000, and $10,000) discontinued in 1969 due to limited use and concerns over money laundering.

Former Treasury officials dismissed the proposal as “impossible under federal statute,” but acknowledged that Trump’s influence over his base could make it a symbolic rallying point rather than a serious monetary initiative. “It’s not about finance — it’s about branding,” said one political analyst. “Trump is tying his identity to the dollar itself, positioning himself as the face of American prosperity.”

Social media reactions have been mixed, with hashtags like #TrumpBill and #250DollarNote trending on X (formerly Twitter). Some users designed mock images of the proposed bill, depicting Trump in various presidential poses, while others mocked the concept, suggesting alternative figures more deserving of the honor.

Whether or not the “Trump $250 bill” ever sees the light of day, the idea underscores Trump’s continued ability to dominate the political conversation — blending celebrity, nationalism, and economic rhetoric in a way that keeps both fans and critics talking.

Conclusion:

While no official action has been taken by the U.S. Treasury or Federal Reserve, Trump’s proposal for a $250 bill featuring his image highlights his ongoing effort to cement his legacy in American history — even, it seems, in the very fabric of its money.

Attached is a news article regarding $250 dollar bill with his face on it 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

King Charles Visits Synagogue Attack Site to Honour Victims and Condemn Hate

King Charles III has paid a solemn visit to the site of the recent synagogue attack, offering condolences to the victims’ families and expressing his deep sorrow over the tragic loss of life. The visit, which took place earlier today, marked a powerful moment of unity and resilience in the face of hate-fuelled violence.

The King was accompanied by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and the Chief Rabbi, Sir Ephraim Mirvis, as he laid a wreath of white lilies at the entrance of the synagogue. A silence was observed for the victims, followed by brief prayers for peace and healing.

In a heartfelt address, King Charles said, “An attack on a place of worship is an attack on the very heart of our shared humanity. No faith, no community, should ever have to live in fear for practising their beliefs.” He praised the courage of first responders and the solidarity shown by people of all backgrounds in the aftermath of the assault.

The attack, which left several worshippers dead and many injured, has shocked the nation and prompted a wave of tributes across the UK. Vigils have been held in London, Manchester, and Glasgow, as faith leaders from across the religious spectrum called for unity and understanding.

Local residents gathered behind police barriers during the King’s visit, many holding candles and messages of peace. One mourner, Sarah Levine, said, “It means a lot that the King came here. It shows we are not alone — that hate will never win.”

Security around places of worship has since been stepped up nationwide, with the government pledging additional funding to protect vulnerable religious sites.

The King’s presence at the scene served as both a message of solidarity and a reminder of Britain’s long-standing commitment to tolerance, compassion, and freedom of belief.

As the nation mourns, faith leaders and citizens alike have vowed to rebuild the synagogue as a symbol of resilience — ensuring that out of tragedy will come renewed strength and unity.

Attached is a news article regarding the King Charles visitong the synagogue attack location 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgzrd3x1pro.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Piattella: The World’s Best Hashish Taking Cannabis Culture by Storm

In the ever-evolving world of cannabis, one name has risen above the rest — Piattella. Hailed by connoisseurs and experts alike as the best hashish in the world, Piattella represents a new era of craftsmanship, quality, and respect for traditional techniques reimagined through modern precision.

What Is Piattella

Piattella is a solventless hash that originates from Spain, specifically from the innovative minds behind Uncle’s Farm, a collective of artisanal hashmakers. What sets Piattella apart is its meticulous curing process — it’s made entirely from fresh-frozen cannabis resin (also known as ice water hash), which is then carefully cold-cured in airtight containers. The result is a soft, buttery, almost “creamy” texture that’s bursting with terpenes and flavour.

The Secret Behind the Texture

Unlike traditional Moroccan or Afghan hash, which tends to be dry and crumbly, Piattella maintains a smooth, oily consistency. This is due to its unique storage method: the hash is sealed and allowed to “sweat” naturally, preserving the volatile terpenes that would normally be lost in conventional drying. The outcome is a product that smells as vibrant and alive as the living plant it came from.

The term Piattella itself comes from the Italian word for “flat,” referencing the flattened shape the hash takes during the curing process. It’s this technique — combined with an almost obsessive attention to temperature and humidity control — that gives Piattella its signature texture and potency.

A Sensory Experience

Those lucky enough to experience Piattella describe it as an entirely different kind of high. The effects are clean, cerebral, and euphoric, with no harshness on the throat or lungs. The flavour is rich and complex, often compared to fresh fruit, earth, and spice — depending on the strain used. When smoked or dabbed, the hash melts smoothly, leaving no residue — a hallmark of its purity.

From Underground Fame to Global Recognition

Piattella started as an insider secret among European hash circles but quickly exploded in popularity through social media and international cannabis competitions. It has since become a benchmark for quality hashmaking, inspiring a new generation of extractors across the world.

Top cannabis influencers and judges at events like The Ego Clash and Legends of Hashish have praised Piattella’s incredible terpene retention and artisanal approach. Many now consider it the gold standard of solventless extraction.

The Future of Hash

As legalization and innovation continue to reshape the global cannabis market, Piattella stands as proof that old-school craftsmanship still reigns supreme when combined with modern science. It’s not just a product — it’s a movement towards purity, transparency, and respect for the plant.

Please understand that this product can affect you health and sound be addressed with caution! ⛔️ 

Attached is a news article regarding piattella the best hash in the world 

https://wcc.com/2024/08/05/the-rise-of-piatella-artisanal-hash-from-barcelona/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 Viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

UK House Prices: A Shifting Landscape

The Current Picture

The UK housing market is showing clear signs of cooling. Several major indicators point to slowing price growth, and in some regions, outright declines.

According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the average UK house price in December 2023 was £285,000, which represented a 2.1% fall compared to December 2022.  

The independent property website Zoopla reported that 4 in 5 local housing markets in the UK were showing year-on-year price falls by October 2023, with declines of up to about 3.5% in commuter towns around London.  

More recently, data from Savills shows that in June 2025, house prices fell by 0.8% on a seasonally adjusted basis — the largest monthly decline since early 2023 — leaving values down 0.6% since the start of the year, though still up around 2.1% year-on-year.  

Looking at asking prices, the major property portal Rightmove reported that the average asking price rose just 0.3% in the 4 weeks to 11 October 2025 — well below the typical seasonal average of ~1.1% — with a year-on-year decline of ~0.1%.  

In short: the market is losing momentum. Growth is small or non-existent; in some places, prices are falling.


Why Are Prices Dropping (or Stalling)

Several intersecting factors are weighing on the housing market.

1. Mortgage Rates and Affordability

With interest rates elevated for some time, borrowing costs remain high, reducing what buyers can afford and dampening demand. For example, affordability pressures were cited in the ONS and Nationwide indices as a key headwind.  

2. Taxation & Policy Changes

The end of certain temporary stamp duty reliefs has increased transaction costs for buyers, especially first-time buyers.  

Uncertainty around future property taxes (such as increased council tax bands, changes to capital gains for high-value homes) is causing many buyers and sellers to delay decisions, which slows the market.  

3. Regional Variations and Market Saturation

Some of the largest falls are in high-value regions or commuter towns where things heated up during the post-pandemic boom. For instance, the South-West and certain parts of Southern England are now seeing more significant downward pressure.  

Conversely, some regions in the North and Scotland are still registering modest growth, showing that the picture is far from uniform.  

4. Supply, Demand and Confidence

With fewer buyers active and more properties on the market in some areas, sellers are under pressure to reduce expectations. The result: more price reductions, longer selling times.  

Buyer confidence is fragile, especially given the broader economic uncertainties (cost-of-living, job security, inflation).

5. Lagging Income Growth

Even though house prices may have stabilised somewhat, the quicker growth in past years means the ratio of house price to income remains challenging for many first-time buyers. Some commentary suggests that for the market to ‘reset’, further price adjustments would help restore affordability. 

Regional Snapshot

London & South-East: Under particular pressure. London recorded one of the steepest annual declines in late 2023 (~4.8% down) per ONS numbers.  

Northern England / Scotland: Some resilience. For example, regions like the North East registered higher annual growth at certain points.  

Rural / Holiday Homes Market: Also facing correction. Country houses / second homes markets are seeing steeper falls (e.g., in some post-pandemic hotspots) because of changing demand patterns.  

What This Means for Different Groups

Sellers: If you’re trying to sell now, you may need to be realistic about pricing and allow for longer time on market. Overpriced homes in a cooling market may face discounts later.

Buyers: Opportunities may be more plentiful than a year ago — less competition, more choice. But you still need to factor in affordability (mortgage rates, deposit, upkeep) and consider longer-term trends.

First-Time Buyers: The market is less frenetic but affordability remains sticky. Mortgage costs are still high relative to income, and you may still face high competition in the cheaper end of the market.

Investors: If you invest in buy-to-let or second homes, consider regional variations carefully — hotspots may no longer guarantee growth, and tax/legislation risks remain.

Policy Makers / Planners: The cooling market provides an opportunity to focus efforts on supply (new housing, infrastructure) and affordability rather than uncontrolled growth. But the lagged effects of past support and the need for stable market confidence are important.

Outlook — What to Watch

Interest rate trajectory: If the Bank of England starts cutting rates more aggressively, borrowing costs could fall, giving a boost to buyer demand and stabilising prices.

Taxation / Policy announcements: The upcoming UK Budget, and any changes to property or buy-to-let taxation, could create shifts (either positive via incentives, or negative via higher costs).

Regional shifts: Whether price corrections deepen in the South or spread to currently stronger regions will matter.

Supply side developments: New housing starts, planning changes, and release of property onto the market will influence how tight or soft the market remains.

Economic backdrop: Inflation, wage growth, employment trends – these all affect buyers’ ability and willingness to move.

Behavioural dynamics: Seller expectations, buyer confidence, and the ‘stickiness’ of prices will shape whether we see a slow drift lower, a sharp correction in some areas, or a sluggish recovery.

My Conclusion

The UK housing market is in a transition phase. The unprecedented growth of recent years has given way to a much more constrained outlook: slower growth, selective falls, and an increasing focus on value and affordability. While a full-scale crash akin to 2008 is not imminent (given supply constraints and structural demand), homeowners and potential buyers should adapt to a market where price stability or modest declines are more likely over the next 12–24 months, especially in risk-ier regions.

Attached is news article regarding home prices in the uk 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-10-10/uk-house-prices-property-market-keeps-rising-despite-budget-fears?utm_medium=cpc_search&utm_campaign=NB_ACQ_DSAXX_DSAXXXXXXXXXX_EVG_XXXX_XXX_Y0629_EN_EN_X_BLOM_GO_SE_XXX_XXXXXXXXXX&gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22916492811&gbraid=0AAAAAD9e5yovbpy9TGfO58mvMp2u1TpZW

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Rise and Fall of Jamie Rothwell — Manchester’s Most Elusive Gangster

Jamie Rothwell’s name has long been whispered in the dark corners of Manchester’s underworld — a figure both feared and respected, whose criminal career reads like something out of a gritty British crime drama. Once one of the most wanted men in the UK, Rothwell’s life has been marked by violence, drug trafficking, and years on the run.

A Notorious Figure in the North West

Rothwell, originally from the Salford area, became a central figure in Manchester’s gangland scene during the 2000s and 2010s. Tied to violent turf wars between rival factions, including those connected to the infamous Gooch and A-Team gangs, his reputation grew as someone deeply entrenched in organised crime.

Known for his volatile temper and connections to high-level drug importation networks, Rothwell’s operations stretched beyond the streets of Manchester, reaching into Spain and the Netherlands. His name appeared in police intelligence reports as part of large-scale cocaine and amphetamine distribution rings.

Years on the Run

In 2015, Rothwell vanished. After being linked to serious violent offences, including attempted murder and firearms charges, he fled abroad. For years, his whereabouts were a mystery. Police believed he was hiding in Spain — one of many British fugitives seeking refuge on the Costa del Sol, often dubbed the “Costa del Crime.”

His evasion of capture only added to his legend. For half a decade, Rothwell remained out of reach while others from Manchester’s criminal hierarchy were arrested, charged, or killed.

Capture and Conviction

In 2020, Rothwell’s run came to an end when Spanish police, working alongside the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA), arrested him in Alicante. Extradited to the UK, he faced justice for his role in violent conspiracies and large-scale drug trafficking.

In 2021, Rothwell was sentenced to 24 years in prison for his part in a series of brutal attacks and a conspiracy to supply class A drugs. The court heard that Rothwell had orchestrated acts of serious violence and was a major player in the criminal networks that brought misery to communities across Greater Manchester.

A Symbol of Manchester’s Gang Legacy

The fall of Jamie Rothwell marked another chapter in the long-running saga of Manchester’s underworld. His capture signalled the end of an era dominated by high-profile gangsters who operated with relative impunity. For law enforcement, it was a major victory — but for those familiar with Rothwell’s influence, it was the closing act of a story that had defined a generation of Salford’s criminal landscape.

Conclusion

Jamie Rothwell’s life serves as a stark reminder of how deeply rooted organised crime remains in some of Britain’s urban centres. His years as a fugitive, his violent reputation, and eventual downfall all underscore the price of living by the rules of the underworld — power, fear, and finally, imprisonment.

Attached is news article regarding regarding Jamie rothwell 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp89jg1n9gdo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 






Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Daring Louvre Heist: Mystery at the World’s Most Famous Museum

In an audacious act that has left art lovers and security experts stunned, a group of highly organised thieves pulled off a daring heist at the Louvre Museum in Paris — home to some of the world’s most treasured masterpieces, including Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa and Eugène Delacroix’s Liberty Leading the People.

A Precision Operation

According to reports from Paris police, the robbery occurred in the early hours of Sunday morning when the museum was closed to the public. Security footage shows at least three masked individuals entering through a restricted underground service entrance. Within just 20 minutes, they managed to disable several motion detectors and bypass the state-of-the-art alarm system — suggesting inside knowledge or expert-level planning.

The stolen pieces, described as “irreplaceable,” are said to include several 18th-century jewellery artifacts and a rare painting from the Italian Renaissance wing. The exact value of the stolen items has not been disclosed, but estimates suggest it could exceed €80 million.

How Did It Happen

The Louvre is known for its tight security — motion sensorsinfrared cameras, and armed guards patrol the museum 24/7. Yet, this heist bears resemblance to other major European art thefts where thieves exploited brief maintenance or power system vulnerabilities. French investigators believe the criminals may have used an advanced electromagnetic device to disrupt alarm communications, allowing them precious minutes to act.

Police Investigation

Paris authorities have launched a massive investigation, working closely with Interpol to track the movements of the suspects. Borders have been alerted, and checkpoints are monitoring for any attempt to smuggle the stolen works out of France. A €10 million reward has been offered for information leading to the recovery of the artworks.

An unnamed Louvre spokesperson said, “We are devastated by this incident. The museum has never experienced a breach of this scale in modern history. Our priority is the safe recovery of the stolen art.”

Echoes of History

This is not the first time the Louvre has been at the centre of a major art crime. In 1911, the Mona Lisa was famously stolen by Italian handyman Vincenzo Peruggia, who believed the painting should be returned to Italy. It was recovered two years later, and the incident only increased the painting’s legendary status.

Today’s heist, however, carries a darker tone — one tied to the black market, where stolen art often vanishes for decades or is used as collateral in illicit trades. Experts warn that if the works are not recovered quickly, they may disappear into private collections or be damaged beyond restoration.

Public Reaction

Outside the museum, crowds have gathered to express shock and anger. Tourists were turned away as police cordoned off the surrounding area. Social media has erupted with theories, ranging from professional crime syndicates to political statements against the French government’s handling of cultural heritage.

What Happens Next

For now, the Louvre remains temporarily closed while forensic teams comb the scene for evidence. As investigators race against time, the heist raises serious questions about how even the most secure cultural institutions can be vulnerable in the digital age.

Whether the thieves will be caught — and the stolen treasures returned — remains to be seen. One thing is certain: the “Louvre Heist” will go down as one of the most extraordinary and mysterious crimes in modern art history.

Attached is a news article regarding Louvre museum robbery 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78z53v43g1o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Sunday, 19 October 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Incident

In the early hours of Friday 3 October 2025, a serious burglary took place at the Co‑operative Food, Cropwell Bishop store on Nottingham Road in the village of Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire. At approximately 2:10 a.m., offenders used a digger to rip a cash machine from the wall of the shop.  

The stolen machine was later recovered, but a quantity of cash was missing. A police cordon remained in place as investigations continued.  

What happened

According to the police, the thieves brought a digger to the scene and used it to remove the ATM unit from the storefront wall of the Co-op.  

The damage to the shop was described as “considerable”, indicating structural harm beyond just the cash machine removal.  

The police are appealing for information from witnesses: they are particularly interested in dash-cam or CCTV footage showing a digger and a red pick-up truck believed to be involved.  

The incident has been logged with the reference Incident number 35, 3 October 2025.  




Impact on the community

For a village like Cropwell Bishop, the Co-op store is not just a convenience store—it hosts the local Post Office and offers essential services (including the cash machine) to many residents. The incident thus carries wider ramifications:

Local councillor Neil Clarke (County Councillor for Bingham West) commended the Co-op for reopening swiftly and restoring the service to the village despite the damage.  

The local guide documents how the cash machine outside the Co-op is an important amenity for residents.  

The damage to the storefront and service disruption would likely have affected elderly or less mobile residents in particular, since alternatives (banks or other shops) may involve travel.

The police have responded by stepping up neighbourhood patrols in the area to provide reassurance to local residents.  

Wider context

This incident is part of a concerning trend in rural and semi-rural areas: heavy plant (diggers, telehandlers, JCBs) being used in ram-raid style attacks to steal ATMs from storefronts. For example:

A similar attack in 2017 used a stolen JCB to pull a cash machine from a shop wall.  

Experts note that such machines are often targeted because they contain large amounts of cash, and the physical removal makes rapid get-away possible.

The Cropwell Bishop incident thus reflects vulnerabilities in rural retail environments: fewer nearby reinforcements, visibility challenges at night, and ready access to heavy machinery (whether stolen or rented).

What’s next

The police investigation continues. Members of the public are encouraged to contact Nottinghamshire Police on 101, quoting incident number 35 of 3 October 2025 if they have any information or relevant footage.  

The store has now reopened and is serving customers again, though rebuilding or repair work may still be ongoing.  

It may prompt the retailer and local authorities to reassess security at cash-machine sites, especially in more vulnerable locations.

In Summary

What started as a quiet early-morning in Cropwell Bishop turned into a dramatic scene: a digger pulling a cash machine out of a village Co-op store, the machine later recovered but cash missing, and a local landmark store damaged and temporarily disrupted. The incident underscores not just the cost of crime but the wider ripple effects on small communities.

Attached is a News article regarding cropwell cash machine ripped from a wall 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr5qje4q5zeo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Elon musk has this future view of robots controlling everything that humans do, aiming that ...