Sunday, 14 December 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach During Hanukkah Celebration Shocks Sydney

Sydney, Australia — 14 December 2025

A mass shooting erupted at the world-famous Bondi Beach in Sydney on Sunday evening, sending shockwaves across the city and drawing a major emergency response from police and medical services.  

Chaos at a Festive Gathering

The incident occurred shortly before 7 p.m. local time during the first day of Chanukah — a Jewish festival of lights. Hundreds of families and beachgoers had gathered for a celebration known as “Chanukah by the Sea,” held near the Bondi Park Playground adjacent to the beach.  

Witnesses reported hearing a barrage of gunshots that initially sounded like fireworks, prompting people to flee in panic. Some ran up the sand toward nearby streets and restaurants, while others sought cover in shops and cafes.  

Gunmen and Police Response

Videos circulated on social media and seen by multiple news outlets appeared to show two individuals dressed in black firing weapons — reported by witnesses as shotguns — from a footbridge overlooking the beach area before the NSW Police arrived.  

Police issued urgent alerts through social media, urging anyone at or near Bondi Beach to “take shelter” and for the public to avoid the area while the situation was labelled a “developing incident.”  

Authorities have confirmed two people were taken into custody in connection with the shooting, though details about their involvement and motives remain under investigation.  

Casualties and Emergency Efforts

Though official figures are still emerging, multiple sources report significant casualties:

At least six people were taken to local hospitals — including St Vincent’s, Royal Prince Alfred and St George — treated by NSW Ambulance at the scene.  

Early reporting suggests multiple fatalities and many injuries, with some media citing up to a dozen deaths and dozens more wounded.  

Emergency services responded with a large deployment of police units, ambulances, medical teams and helicopters. Officers were also seen performing CPR on the ground as bystanders helped victims in the immediate aftermath.  


Community and Leadership Reactions

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the scenes as “shocking and distressing”, expressing solidarity with those affected and emphasizing that authorities were doing all they could to save lives.  

NSW Premier Chris Minns urged calm and reiterated that the situation was still under active investigation, warning the public to heed police directions.  

Leaders within the Jewish community have voiced deep concern given that the shooting intersected with a religious festival. Some organisations have tied the attack to broader anxieties around antisemitic violence, though official motive investigations continue.  

Ongoing Investigation

Authorities have established exclusion zones around Bondi Beach and continue to collect evidence. Police lines and roadblocks remain in place while forensic and tactical units work the scene.

Police have not yet released official casualty figures or confirmed a definitive motive. They have appealed to anyone with information or footage to come forward to assist in the investigation.

Attached is a news article regarding nine people killed in bondi on a beach 

https://www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-41759771.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Saturday, 13 December 2025

Smileband News

 


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

King’s Cancer Recovery: A Moment of Hope for the Nation

The United Kingdom has been united in cautious optimism as King Charles III continues his recovery following a cancer diagnosis announced earlier this year. Buckingham Palace confirmed that the monarch is responding positively to treatment, offering reassurance to millions who have followed his health closely.

A Carefully Managed Return to Duty

After stepping back from full public duties on medical advice, the King has gradually resumed a limited schedule, balancing rest with carefully selected engagements. Palace officials have stressed that his return is being guided by doctors, with the monarch prioritising recovery while remaining committed to his constitutional role.

National and Global Support

Messages of goodwill have poured in from across the UK and around the world. Political leadersfaith groupscharities and members of the public have shared their support, reflecting the King’s long-standing advocacy for health, environmental causes and community service. Public appearances—even brief ones—have been met with warm applause, symbolising collective encouragement.

A Spotlight on Health Awareness

The King’s openness has sparked wider conversations about early detection, treatment and the importance of medical supportHealth charities report renewed public interest in screenings and information, underscoring how visible leadership can influence awareness and reduce stigma.

The Role of Family

Throughout his treatment, the Royal Family has remained close. Queen Camilla has taken on additional responsibilities, while other senior royals have supported engagements, ensuring continuity and stability during the King’s recovery period.

Looking Ahead

While the Palace continues to respect medical privacy, officials remain hopeful about the months ahead. The King’s steady progress represents more than a personal milestone—it has become a shared moment of resilience for the country. As he continues his recovery, the nation watches with optimism, wishing him strength and good health.

Attached is a news article regarding king cancer recovery 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c14vvv8pnpmo

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Set to Sign Executive Order on Federal Cannabis Reform as Weed Stocks Surge

Washington, D.C. — December 13, 2025

President Donald J. Trump is poised to sign a landmark executive order directing federal agencies to reclassify marijuana under federal law, triggering a dramatic surge in cannabis-related stocks across global markets.

The anticipated order — expected as soon as Monday, December 15 — would move marijuana from its current Schedule I status under the Controlled Substances Act (the category reserved for drugs “with no currently accepted medical use” and high risk of abuse such as heroin and LSD) to Schedule III, a classification shared with certain prescription painkillers with accepted medical uses.  

Market Reaction: A Green Rally

The financial markets reacted almost immediately to the news:

Major U.S.-listed cannabis stocks saw double-digit gains on Friday, with Tilray Brands up around 28–35% and Canopy Growth jumping as much as 50% intraday.  

Cannabis-focused ETFs, including the AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF, rallied strongly, reflecting broad sector optimism.  

Even traditionally unrelated sectors felt the impact: tobacco giants British American Tobacco and Imperial Brands slid as capital rotated into cannabis names.  

Sector analysts characterize the spike as one of the most dramatic single-day rallies for pot stocks in years — a sign that investors believe real regulatory change could finally unlock decades of pent-up industry potential.  

What the Executive Order Could Mean

If enacted, the executive order would not legalize marijuana nationwide — that requires an act of Congress — but it would significantly loosen federal barriers that have long constrained the industry. Key implications include:

Tax relief: Companies currently face punitive federal tax treatment under Section 280E, forcing them to forgo normal deductions; moving to Schedule III would largely eliminate that penalty.  

Banking access: Rescheduling could make it easier for cannabis firms to open accounts, obtain credit, and attract institutional investors wary of federal risks.  

Research expansion: A Schedule III classification would ease restrictions on clinical studies, potentially accelerating medical research into cannabis therapies.  

Industry advocates have long argued that federal classification as a “less dangerous” substance would unlock billions in economic growth and help normalize a patchwork of conflicting state laws.  

Political and Practical Challenges Ahead

Despite the enthusiasm in markets, not all hurdles are cleared. A White House spokesperson has noted no final decision has been made, underscoring that the regulatory process — including internal agency rulemaking — could take months to complete.  

Moreover, rescheduling will not instantly override all state laws, and significant debate remains among lawmakers, regulators, and advocacy groups over the pace and scope of federal cannabis reform. Full federal legalization remains a longer-term political battle, with legislative action still required.  

What Investors Should Know

The surge in cannabis equities reflects not only hope for regulatory certainty but also speculative positioning. Analysts warn that while rescheduling offers meaningful structural benefits, the pathway to implementation is complex and subject to further legal and bureaucratic review. Nonetheless, for many companies that have operated for years under restrictive federal policy, this moment represents an unprecedented opportunity.  

Attached is a news article regarding trump signed a federal order regarding weed stocks as they surge in the stock market 

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/cannabis-stocks-surge-report-trump-seeks-ease-restrictions-2025-12-12/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36




















Friday, 12 December 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Racism in Germany: The Reality of Being Black and German

Germany is often seen as a modern, progressive European nation — a country shaped by history, responsibility, and a strong commitment to democracy. Yet for many Black Germans, daily life tells a more complicated story. Being both Black and German still comes with challenges that are frequently overlooked, minimised, or misunderstood.

A History That Is Often Ignored

Black people have lived in Germany for centuries, from African soldiers and scholars in the Holy Roman Empire to Afro-Germans born after World War I and II. Despite this long presence, Black Germans are often treated as newcomers or outsiders. The common question, “Where are you really from?” highlights a deeper issue — the assumption that German identity is white by default.

This erasure of Black German history contributes to a lack of understanding and empathy, reinforcing stereotypes and exclusion.

Everyday Racism and Microaggressions

For many Black Germans, racism is not always loud or violent — it is subtle, persistent, and exhausting. Microaggressions are part of daily life:

Being stared at on public transport

Being followed in shops

Having qualifications questioned

Being spoken to slowly or in broken German

Being praised for “speaking good German” despite being born there

These experiences send a constant message: You do not belong.

Discrimination in Work and Housing

Studies and lived experiences show that Black Germans face discrimination in employment and housing. Job applicants with foreign-sounding names are less likely to be invited to interviews, even with identical qualifications. In housing, Black families report being ignored by landlords or rejected without explanation.

This structural racism limits opportunities and reinforces economic inequality, making social mobility far more difficult.

Policing and Racial Profiling

Racial profiling remains a major concern. Black Germans are disproportionately stopped, searched, and questioned by police — often without cause. While German law technically restricts profiling, enforcement and accountability remain weak.

These interactions damage trust between Black communities and authorities, leaving many feeling unsafe in the very institutions meant to protect them.

Identity Struggles: “Too Black to Be German”

One of the most painful aspects of racism in Germany is the constant questioning of identity. Black Germans are often told they are “not really German,” regardless of citizenship, language, or culture. This creates a sense of alienation — being too Black to be accepted as German, yet too German to be seen as foreign elsewhere.

For young Black Germans, this can lead to identity struggles, mental health challenges, and feelings of isolation.

Progress, Resistance, and Hope

Despite these challenges, Black Germans continue to resist, organise, and thrive. Activists, writers, artists, and academics are reclaiming space, telling their stories, and challenging racist narratives. Movements inspired by global anti-racism efforts have sparked national conversations about colonialism, police reform, and representation.

Germany has taken steps forward — acknowledging racism more openly and introducing diversity initiatives — but real change requires more than statements. It demands accountability, education, and structural reform.

Conclusion

Being Black and German should not be a contradiction. Yet for many, racism turns identity into a constant battle. Recognising Black Germans as an integral part of the nation’s past, present, and future is essential for Germany to truly live up to its democratic values.

Racism in Germany is not just a problem for those who experience it — it is a challenge for the entire society. Only by listening to Black voices, confronting uncomfortable truths, and committing to real change can Germany move closer to equality for all.

Attached is a news article regarding racism in Germany 

https://amp.dw.com/en/germany-racism-black-people-muslims-discrimination/a-71990114

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Celebrities Speaking Out on Islam: Voices of Support, Critique and Conversation in a Changing World

In recent years, Islam has increasingly become part of public conversations across entertainment, politics, and social media. As global events, cultural debates, and rising social tensions continue to shape public opinion, a growing number of celebrities have stepped forward to share their views — some offering support and calls for unity, others speaking about challenges, misconceptions, and personal experiences that shaped their understanding of the world’s second-largest religion.

Raising Awareness Against Islamophobia

A number of high-profile figures have used their platforms to condemn Islamophobia, highlighting the rising levels of discrimination faced by Muslim communities worldwide.

Riz Ahmed, the British-Pakistani actor and activist, has been one of the most outspoken voices in Hollywood. He has repeatedly warned about the dangerous rise of anti-Muslim sentiment in Western societies and has urged the entertainment industry to improve Muslim representation, arguing that stereotypical portrayals contribute to real-world hostility.

Similarly, Bella Hadid, one of the world’s most influential models, has openly spoken about her Palestinian and Muslim heritage. She has used her global platform to challenge negative stereotypes and celebrate Islamic culture, especially during Ramadan and Eid festivities. Her messages of cultural pride often resonate with millions of young followers.

Celebrities Embracing Islam

For some public figures, speaking about Islam is deeply personal. Actors, athletes, and musicians who have converted to Islam — or rediscovered their family faith — often describe the religion as a source of peace and structure in their lives.

Cat Stevens (Yusuf Islam), the iconic British singer-songwriter, has long been vocal about how Islam transformed his worldview. He continues to advocate for interfaith dialogue and humanitarian causes.

In sports, stars like Mike Tyson and former NBA player Kareem Abdul-Jabbar frequently discuss how Islam grounded them during turbulent periods of their careers. Abdul-Jabbar, in particular, has become a respected social commentator, writing about the need for deeper understanding between Muslim and non-Muslim communities.

Celebrities Addressing Misconceptions

Many celebrities who speak about Islam aim to challenge widely held misconceptions. Mahershala Ali, the first Muslim actor to win an Academy Award, has been an influential voice stressing that Islam is not a monolithic religion. He highlights the diversity of Muslim cultures, practices, and identities — from Africa and Asia to Europe and the Americas.

Public figures like Hasan Minhaj, the comedian and former host of Patriot Act, use humour to break down stereotypes while tackling serious issues such as immigration, identity, and global politics. Their approach often helps younger audiences rethink preconceived ideas about Muslim communities.

Controversial Comments Spark Debate

While many celebrities speak positively about Islam, others have sparked controversy with comments that critics say fuel division or misunderstandings.

Some musicians and actors have made remarks that were widely condemned as insensitive or uninformed. In these cases, backlash and public pressure often lead to apologies, clarifications, or broader public debate. These incidents highlight just how sensitive and significant discussions about religion have become in entertainment and online culture.

The Global Impact of Celebrity Influence

In a world where public figures can reach millions with a single post, celebrity voices play a powerful role in shaping public perception. When stars speak thoughtfully about Islam — whether highlighting cultural beauty, addressing discrimination, or sharing personal journeys — they can help counter misinformation and encourage understanding.

At the same time, careless remarks can deepen divides and reinforce stereotypes, underscoring the responsibility that comes with influence.

A Conversation Still Evolving

As global audiences grow more diverse and interconnected, discussions around Islam are unlikely to fade from the spotlight. Celebrities now play an increasingly visible role in shaping these conversations, helping millions of people navigate complex issues of faith, identity, and social harmony.

Ultimately, the voices rising today — whether in favour, in critique, or in search of clarity — reflect a wider global conversation about how societies understand and respect one another.

Attached is a news article about key famous people speaking out on Islam 

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/pictures/famous-muslim-celebrities/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Shark Attack in Australia: Man Seriously Injured in Sudden Coastal Encounter

A man is recovering in hospital after being attacked by a shark off the coast of Australia in a terrifying incident that has once again raised concerns about marine safety in the region. The attack occurred on Thursday morning at a popular coastal spot known for its clear waters, consistent surf, and occasional shark activity.

A Quiet Swim Turns Violent

According to local authorities, the man—believed to be in his 30s—was swimming around 50 metres from shore when the shark struck. Witnesses reported seeing the swimmer suddenly thrash in the water before a large shadow circled beneath the surface. Moments later, the shark clamped down on the man’s leg, pulling him under briefly before releasing him.

Beachgoers who spotted the incident immediately alerted lifeguards, who rushed into the water on jet skis. They managed to reach the man within minutes and brought him back to shore, applying urgent first aid to stem heavy bleeding.

Life-Saving Response

Paramedics arrived shortly afterward and transported the victim to a nearby hospital via helicopter. Medical staff have confirmed that he sustained deep lacerations to his thigh and calf but is now in stable condition after emergency surgery.

Authorities praised the rapid actions of lifeguards and bystanders, stating that their quick intervention prevented what could have been a fatal outcome.

Beach Closed as Investigation Begins

The beach has been temporarily closed while marine experts and wildlife officers investigate. Early assessments suggest the shark involved was likely a great white, a species commonly found in Australian watersDrones and patrol boats have been deployed to monitor the area.

Local councils have increased precautions by issuing alerts to nearby beaches, encouraging swimmers and surfers to remain vigilant.

Shark Activity on the Rise

Australia records some of the highest numbers of shark encounters globally, though fatal attacks remain rare. Warmer temperatures and shifting ocean conditions have brought sharks closer to populated coastlines in recent years, prompting renewed calls for improved safety measures.

Marine biologists, however, continue to advocate for balanced perspectives. They emphasise that while attacks are traumatic, sharks play an essential role in ocean ecosystems and must not be indiscriminately targeted.

Community Reaction

Residents expressed shock at the incident, with several saying they had never witnessed such a close encounter before. Others noted that shark sightings have become more common but stressed that people should respect the ocean’s natural inhabitants.

The victim’s family has thanked emergency responders and asked for privacy as he continues his recovery.

Attached is a news article regarding a man who was killed by a shark in Australia 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8r9p28yp7o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Should the UK Raise the Age of Consent from 16 to 20

A Deep Dive Into Law, Vulnerability, and Social Responsibility. 

The United Kingdom’s age of consent—set at 16 years old—has for decades been a subject of debate among parents, safeguarding professionalspsychologists, and policymakers. Today, with the development of the internet, increased awareness of grooming, and a sharper understanding of cognitive maturity, an argument is growing louder: the age of consent should be increased from 16 to 20.

This proposal is not merely about changing a number. It is about reassessing what “consent” truly means in a modern society, and whether the current law unintentionally opens the door to exploitation and harmful power imbalances.


A Law Rooted in History, Not Modern Reality

The age of consent in the UK was originally set in an era where:

Adolescents entered adulthood earlier

Societal roles and expectations were drastically different

Digital technology and grooming networks did not exist

Today, however, 16-year-olds live in a more complex and predatory world. Their interactions with adults are no longer limited to real-life environments. Social media, messaging apps, and dating platforms expose them to thousands of strangers—some harmless, some manipulative, and some intentionally preying on emotional and cognitive immaturity.

When the law states that a 16-year-old can legally have sex with an adult of any age, it unintentionally sends a message that such relationships are inherently acceptable, regardless of the age gap or the emotional imbalance involved.

The Cognitive Gap: Legality vs. Psychological Readiness

Modern neuroscientific research shows a clear pattern:

The human brain is not fully developed until around age 20–25.

Adolescents struggle to distinguish manipulation from “attention”.

Emotional reasoning often overpowers logical decision-making.

This means a legal green light at 16 often clashes with biological reality. Many teenagers are simply not equipped to evaluate:

Power imbalances

Pressures from older partners

Emotional manipulation

The long-term consequences of sexual relationships

While many 16-year-olds are responsible and intelligent, the law must be designed to protect the least protected, not assume maturity from all.

The Problem of “Legal Grey Zones

Because 16 is a legally permissible age for sexual activity, some predatory individuals use this to justify highly inappropriate relationships.

This legal permissiveness can blur moral boundaries, especially for individuals who lack empathy, emotional intelligence, or a firm understanding of ethical behaviour. Some people interpret permissive laws not as boundaries but as opportunities.

The result. 

A society where legal loopholes can overshadow moral duty, and where vulnerable young people may be drawn into relationships that they are legally permitted to enter but not emotionally prepared for.

A Haven for Exploitation. 

It is not accurate to say the UK is a “haven for paedophiles,” as the law strongly criminalises sexual activity with anyone under 16 and has extensive safeguarding measures. However, there is a genuine problem:

Adults who target teenagers often operate in the narrow gap between moral wrongness and legal permissibility.

Many countries around the world—especially in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East—view 16 as an extremely low threshold for sexual consent with adults. This difference in cultural standards sometimes creates a perception that the UK is more tolerant of large age-gap relationships involving teenagers.

Raising the age to 20 would:

Close the loophole

Eliminate moral ambiguity

Remove the social and legal justifications used by predatory adults

Align UK law with modern neuroscience rather than outdated social norms

Raising the Age to 20: What Would Change. 

1. Clearer Protection for Adolescents

A higher age of consent creates a stronger barrier between vulnerable youth and older adults with manipulative intentions.

2. Reduced Grooming Pathways

Many grooming cases begin at age 14–16, with abusers waiting until the victim turns 16. Raising the age to 20 removes this strategy entirely.

3. Stronger Message About Power Imbalances

The law would reflect an understanding that psychological maturity matters as much as biological maturity.

4. Public Clarity and Cultural Shift

Relationships between teenagers and much older adults would no longer hide behind legality. Society would be encouraged to value emotional maturity and autonomy.

A Cultural Conversation We Can No Longer Ignore

Raising the age of consent will always spark debate. Supporters see it as vital protection; critics argue it infringes personal freedom. But the core question remains:

Is 16 truly old enough to navigate sexual relationships with adults, or does the law need modernization. 

Given the global digital landscape, increased exposure to exploitation, and deeper understanding of adolescent development, many argue the answer is clear:

The UK should consider raising the legal age of consent to 20 to better protect young people from manipulation, exploitation, and predatory behaviour.

Attached is a news article regarding the legal age to have sex in the uk should increase from 16 to

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/08/lower-age-consent-14-1979-home-office-report

https://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/article/age-consent-around-world-uk

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-24976929.amp


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36
























Thursday, 11 December 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Revealed: The Apps Most Commonly Linked to Child Abuse Offences

New police data and safety reports have exposed a stark reality of the digital age: certain apps and platforms are being disproportionately used to commit—or facilitate—child abuse offences, from grooming to the sharing of illegal images. The findings are raising alarm among child protection agencies, law enforcement and parents worldwide.

 Snapchat: The Most Frequent Platform in Abuse Cases

According to recent police figures in the UK, Snapchat is the social media app most commonly used in reported child exploitation and abuse offences. In the year 2024:

Snapchat was involved in more recorded offences than any other platform.  

An estimated 11,912 online child sexual abuse crimes were linked to Snapchat, significantly higher than WhatsApp and Instagram.  

Independent data shows Snapchat accounts for around half of all recorded online child sexual abuse image offences within some datasets.  

Experts attribute this in part to Snapchat’s ephemeral messaging: the promise of messages disappearing can make it easier for offenders to communicate with children in private and avoid detection.  

Police and child protection leads have been clear: no platform is inherently a “grooming app”, but design choices can make some spaces more attractive or risky for offenders.

Messaging and Social Platforms Also Feature High in Statistics

While Snapchat tops the list, other mainstream apps also show up in law enforcement data:

WhatsApp and Instagram — both Meta-owned platforms — appear frequently in recorded online abuse offences, albeit at lower levels compared to Snapchat.  

Dedicated messaging services with private or encrypted chats can pose challenges for detection and moderation, making them potential vectors for abuse.

The issue isn’t limited to social messaging. A broader trend shows that adults with histories of sexual offences against children tend to use dating apps and other general-purpose platforms at alarming rates, according to international child safety research.  

Other Apps with Safety Concerns

Beyond the most recent figures, historical and safety reports flag other apps that have attracted scrutiny for user safety issues related to minors:

Kik: Law enforcement has historically identified Kik as having a high incidence of explicit content shared between adults and minors, and police have described difficulties obtaining information from the company when investigating suspects.  

Yubo: Often described as a “Tinder for teens,” Yubo has been connected in past reporting with predatory behaviour and grooming risks due to its swiping and chat features aimed at young users.  

These apps illustrate how features designed for casual chatting or socialization—such as anonymous profiles, easy connection tools, or swipe-to-match interfaces—can be exploited by offenders.

 Why This Matters

Online child sexual abuse and exploitation have risen significantly in recent years. In England and Wales alone, overall child sexual exploitation offences increased in 2024, with online abuse rising notably.  

Experts and law enforcement are urging tech companies to do more than just reactive moderation. They say powerful proactive tools — such as automated detection systems, robust age verificationreporting transparency, and safer default settings for minors — are critical to preventing harm before it happens.

Authorities also caution that recorded figures likely underestimate the problem, since many offences go unreported or undetected.

Safety Tips for Parents and Guardians

While legislation and tech improvements are evolving, parents and guardians can take practical steps to reduce risk:

Use parental controls and privacy settings on all devices and apps.

Discuss online safety regularly with children, including how to spot and report inappropriate contact.

Monitor friend lists and messaging behaviour for unknown or suspicious contacts.

Set clear boundaries on age-appropriate apps and online interactions.

In Summary

Apps commonly associated with child abuse offences are not inherently designed for harm — but platform design, privacy features, and user behaviour can be exploited by offenders. Snapchat currently leads in recorded cases, but messaging services and other social platforms also play a role. Collaborative efforts among tech companies, regulators, law enforcement, and families are vital to better protect children online.

Attached is a news article regarding the most appropriate associated with child abuse offences 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband

Did Ilhan Omar’s net worth really jump from $65,000 to over $30 million in three years?

A viral claim that Representative Ilhan Omar went from being worth roughly $65,000 to more than $30 million in just a few years exploded across social media in late 2025. The story is rooted in real public filings — but the headline figure needs context. Below I’ll explain what the filings show, where the big jump came from, and what the limits of those numbers are.

What the official filings say

Congressional financial disclosure forms filed in 2025 (covering holdings at the end of 2024) list Rep. Omar and her husband, Tim Mynett, as having a household net worth in a range between roughly $6 million and $30 million. Those documents — the primary source for this story — are public and available from the Clerk of the House.  

Journalists who read the filings reported the top end of the range (the “up to $30 million” number) and compared it to prior filings, which showed much smaller reported values. That is where the “$65,000 → $30 million” framing appears to come from: earlier filings showed the couple’s combined net worth much lower (reporting roughly $65K in a prior filing is cited in reporting).  


Why the numbers jumped on paper

There are three simple facts that explain why the headlines look dramatic:

1. The filing reports ranges, not exact dollar-and-cents. When members of Congress declare assets they report value ranges (for example, $1,000–$5,000; $1,000,000–$5,000,000; etc.). That means a line that reads “$6 million–$30 million” is a wide bracket, not a statement of liquid cash in a bank account.  

2. Much of the increase is tied to her husband’s stake in private businesses. The filings show the bulk of the value is associated with ownership stakes in two private businesses — a California winery (eStCru LLC) and a venture/asset-management firm (Rose Lake Capital LLC) — that are reported as partnership interests. Private-company valuations can move enormously between periodic filings (and are often estimated in wide ranges). The filings attribute most of the household value to those companies.  

3. A previous filing showed much smaller reported values for those same stakes. In the earlier disclosure (end of 2023), those stakes were listed at comparatively small amounts (the earlier filings valued the holdings in the low tens of thousands), producing a large percent increase when compared to the 2024 filing ranges. That arithmetic — comparing a small prior number to a very large range — is what produced the “3,500% increase” or similar percentages quoted in many stories.  

What Rep. Omar said

Earlier in 2025 Rep. Omar publicly pushed back against “millionaire” claims about her personal wealth, saying she “barely has thousands, let alone millions” and noting she didn’t own stocks or a house and still had student debt. That statement — made before the 2024 filing was public — has been widely cited as part of the controversy.  

What fact-checks and reporters emphasize

Fact-checkers and explanatory pieces note important caveats: the disclosure reflects household wealth (Omar and her husband filing together); it uses broad ranges; and the valuations reported for private firms are estimates that can be revised or recharacterized. Snopes and other outlets reviewed the filings and the social-media claims and concluded the headlines were a simplified reading of the public documents that omitted important nuance.  

Bottom line

Yes: public congressional disclosures filed in 2025 list Omar and her husband’s household net worth in a range that includes as much as $30 million. The filings are the factual basis for the viral headlines.  

No: the “$65,000 → $30,000,000 in three years” headline is a simplification. It compresses a set of wide valuation ranges, household reporting, and private-company valuation changes into a single, dramatic sound bite. The filings do show a very large change in reported ranges versus prior filings, but those ranges are not the same as a bank-balance statement and are often driven by valuation methods for private businesses.  

Why this matters

The story touches on real public-policy issues: transparency in member disclosures, how private-company interests are reported, and whether elected officials should provide clearer valuations. It also shows how easy it is for nuance to be lost when a bracketed disclosure range becomes a viral claim.

Attached is a news article regarding ilhan Omar Net worth increased from 65,000 to 30 million in three years 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ilhan-omar-refutes-claim-her-103500743.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News

 


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Unveils ‘Visa Gold Card’: A New Symbol of Wealth, Loyalty, and Political Power

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has launched yet another bold venture bearing his name — the Trump Visa Gold Card, a flashy new financial product marketed as a “luxury status symbol for true American winners.” The announcement has quickly ignited debate, enthusiasm, and controversy in equal measure.

A Card Branded With Trump’s Signature Style

The Trump Visa Gold Card, wrapped in metallic gold colouring with Trump’s name stamped across the front, is being advertised as a premium lifestyle card designed for supporters, collectors, and those who want to project wealth and exclusivity.

According to promotional material, the card promises:

Exclusive reward tiers tied to Trump-branded businesses and events

Access to VIP experiences such as golf courses, political rallies, and hotel packages

Membership-only benefits including discounts on merchandise and select partnerships

uniquely themed loyalty system that encourages “patriot spending

While some see this as a clever business move, critics argue that Trump is once again monetising political influence and turning his brand into a financial ecosystem that blurs the line between politics and commerce.

Supporters See It as a Collector’s Trophy

For Trump’s base, the Visa Gold Card is being embraced as a badge of honour.

Social media has already been flooded with images of enthusiastic supporters showing off the card, calling it a “piece of history” and a “patriotic statement.”

The card is positioned not just as a financial tool, but as a symbol of loyalty, similar to his previous ventures with limited-edition sneakersNFTs, and gold-plated memorabilia.

Critics Question the Ethics — and the Fine Print

Opponents quickly raised concerns about the ethics of a political figure launching a quasi-luxury financial product.

Some finance analysts have also questioned:

Whether the reward system meaningfully benefits users or mainly funnels money toward Trump-branded enterprises

The interest rates or fees associated with the card

Potential misuse of political branding in financial marketing

For political watchdogs, the bigger issue is whether a product like this adds another layer to the ongoing fusion of Trump’s business ventures with his political aspirations.

A Marketing Masterstroke or a Vanity Product

Whether loved or loathed, the Trump Visa Gold Card fits the former President’s long-standing strategy:

turn every moment, every headline, and every supporter into an opportunity to expand the Trump brand.

For millions, it will be a must-have symbol of identity.

For critics, it is yet another provocative move that reinforces Trump’s unique — and polarising — approach to business and politics.

Regardless of perspective, the launch proves one thing:

Trump is continuing to turn political momentum into profitable enterprise, and he shows no plans of slowing down.

Attached is a news article regarding trumps gold Visa card 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-launches-gold-card-program-expedited-visas-with-1-million-price-tag-2025-12-11/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Greenland: The Arctic’s Buried Treasure — Hidden Resources under Ice and Rock Greenland, the...