AD

Thursday, 8 January 2026

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Former Premier League Referee David Coote Avoids Jail Sentence Over Abuse Video

Former Premier League referee David Coote, once one of English football’s top officials, has narrowly avoided an immediate prison sentence after admitting involvement with an indecent video involving a minor. The news has shocked the football community and reignited debate about accountability for public figures.  

Court Case and Sentence

Coote, 43, appeared at Nottingham Crown Court on Thursday where prosecutors detailed that a Category A sexual video involving a 15-year-old boy in school uniform was found on his personal laptop by police. Under UK law, Category A is the most serious classification of indecent imagery, covering the most severe forms of child abuse material.  

After pleading guilty to making an indecent image of a child in October 2025, Coote was sentenced to nine months in prison, but the sentence was suspended for two years. In addition to the suspended sentence, the judge ordered:

150 hours of unpaid work

A 10-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order, restricting contact with children

A requirement to adhere to other probation conditions set by the court

Judge Nirmal Shant KC remarked that Coote had suffered a “spectacular fall from grace” during proceedings and stressed the severity of offences involving material that depicts real children being abused.  

How the Case Came to Light

The explicit material was discovered after police began a separate investigation into Coote following a controversial video of him making derogatory comments about then-Liverpool manager Jürgen Klopp, dating back to 2020. That video had originally sparked scrutiny by the Football Association (FA) and led to Coote’s sacking by Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) in December 2024.  

Police seized multiple electronic devices from Coote’s Nottinghamshire home in February 2025, leading to the discovery of the video dating from January 2020.  

Downfall of a High-Profile Official

Once a respected referee, Coote officiated over 100 Premier League matches and had been part of the English refereeing elite for years. However, a series of incidents — including the viral Klopp rant and an unrelated video of him consuming cocaine while on duty at Euro 2024 — significantly tarnished his reputation. He was also banned by UEFA until June 2026 as part of disciplinary action.  

In January 2025, Coote publicly spoke about personal struggles with his sexuality and mental health, suggesting these had impacted his behaviour, though these issues were not a factor in the legal case regarding the indecent imagery.  

Public Reaction and Broader Context

The sentence has prompted strong reactions, with many commentators and fans questioning why Coote avoided immediate custody despite the grave nature of the offence. Supporters of the decision point to his guilty plea, court-mandated rehabilitation efforts, and isolated nature of the offence, while critics argue that public figures should face the full weight of the law, especially in child protection cases.

Legal experts explain that suspended sentences are not uncommon in cases where courts believe the offender poses a low risk of reoffending and that rehabilitation can be achieved outside of prison, although such outcomes remain controversial. (This aspect reflects general legal context and is not a direct news quote.)

Attached is a news article regarding former premier league referee David coote avoids jail sentence 

https://news.sky.com/story/former-premier-league-referee-david-coote-avoids-jail-sentence-over-sexual-video-of-schoolboy-13491911

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Iran Strikes U.S. Bases in Qatar and Iraq — A New Phase of Conflict

In a dramatic escalation of tensions in the Middle East, Iran launched missile attacks on U.S. military bases in both Qatar and Iraq on June 23, 2025, marking one of the most direct confrontations between Tehran and Washington in recent years. The strikes were described by Iranian state media as retaliation for American military actions against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.  

What Happened

Missile Barrage Launched: Late on June 23, Iran’s armed forces fired a series of ballistic and medium-range missiles targeting the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the largest U.S. military facility in the Middle East and the forward headquarters for U.S. Central Command. Reports also indicated that an Iranian missile was launched toward or into Iraq, targeting U.S. forces stationed at bases such as Ain al-Asad.  

Retaliation for U.S. Strikes on Nuclear Sites: Tehran framed the attacks as a direct response to U.S. airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear facilities just the day before — part of Operation Midnight Hammer — which Iran said severely damaged its nuclear program.  

Advance Warning and Interceptions: According to U.S. and Qatari officials, Iran provided advance warning of the planned strike, allowing air defenses to activate. Qatar and U.S. Patriot missile batteries intercepted the incoming missiles, and no U.S. casualties were reported.  

No Confirmed Major Damages: While some missiles reportedly reached the vicinity of the Al Udeid base, both U.S. and Qatari authorities stated damage was minimal and there were no reported deaths or injuries.  

Why Qatar and Iraq? Strategic Targets

Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar: This sprawling U.S. hub near Doha hosts thousands of troops and serves as the operational center for many American air missions across the region. Its targeting highlighted Iran’s intent to send a strategic message to Washington.  

U.S. Bases in Iraq: While less confirmed than the Qatar strike, reports suggested that Iranian missiles or drones may have also targeted U.S. positions in Iraq — a deployment long subject to attacks by Iran-aligned militia groups.  

Reactions Across the Region and Beyond

Regional governments expressed deep concern and condemnation. Qatar called the assault a violation of its sovereignty and international law, even as it defended U.S. personnel from the missile threat. Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and Bahrain denounced Iran’s actions as destabilizing and a breach of territorial integrity.  

Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump labelled Iran’s strike a “very weak response” and insisted the U.S. had effectively intercepted nearly all missiles launched. He also suggested that the warning provided by Iran was a factor in preventing casualties.  

Global Security Implications

This confrontation feeds into a wider Middle East crisis, involving the Iran-Israel conflict and U.S. efforts to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The strikes marked one of the first direct Iranian military responses to U.S. operations in recent conflicts and indicate Tehran’s willingness to retaliate against American military assets if its strategic interests are attacked.  

Analysts have noted that the assault was likely calibrated to be symbolic rather than fully destructive — aimed at demonstrating capability and resolve without triggering a full regional war. The prior notice to Qatar and the U.S. supports this interpretation.  

What Happens Next

The attack has heightened tensions across the Middle East and disrupted civil aviation due to precautionary airspace closures in Kuwait, Bahrain, and other Gulf states. Efforts at diplomatic de-escalation continue even as both sides strengthen their defenses.  

Conclusion

Iran’s June 2025 missile strikes on U.S. military bases in Qatar and Iraq marked a significant escalation in the long-standing tensions between Tehran and Washington. While the strikes caused no reported casualties, they underscored the fragility of regional security and the potential for rapid escalation following military confrontations over nuclear facilities and influence in the Middle East.

Attached is a news article regarding Iran attacking us bases in Qatar and Iraq 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjxdgjpd48o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Wednesday, 7 January 2026

Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

ICE Officer Fatally Shoots Woman in Minneapolis During Immigration Operation

A 37-year-old woman, identified as Renee Nicole Good, was shot and killed by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer in south Minneapolis on the morning of January 7 2026 as federal agents conducted a large immigration enforcement operation.  

The shooting took place near East 34th Street and Portland Avenue, a residential neighbourhood weeks after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) deployed hundreds of agents to the area as part of an intensified immigration crackdown.  

According to eyewitness video and bystander accounts, the woman’s SUV was stationary across the roadway, reportedly blocking traffic. As federal agents approached, the vehicle began to move. At that point, at least one ICE officer fired multiple shots into or through the vehicle, striking the driver, who was later pronounced dead at a hospital.  

DHS and ICE officials have described the incident as an act of self-defense, claiming the woman attempted to “weaponize her vehicle,” allegedly trying to run over officers. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem labelled the woman’s actions as a potential act of “domestic terrorism.”  

However, local officials and witnesses strongly dispute that narrative. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Police Chief Brian O’Hara said video evidence does not clearly show the woman posing a deadly threat before she was shot, and Frey publicly demanded that ICE leave the city.  

The killing occurred on streets not far from where George Floyd was killed in 2020, adding to the tense atmosphere and sparking anger among community members, activists, and residents. Vigils and protests broke out near the scene, with hundreds paying tribute to Good and condemning the federal agents’ actions.  

Conflicting Accounts and National Debate

The incident has quickly become a flashpoint in the larger national debate over immigration enforcement and use of force by federal law enforcement:

Federal officials maintain that the ICE officer acted lawfully in the face of a perceived threat during a broader operation targeting alleged immigration fraud cases in Minnesota.  

Local leaders and civil liberties advocates argue the shooting was unnecessary and reckless, pointing to bystander video they say contradicts the claim that the woman was actively trying to harm officers.  

The Minnesota governor, Tim Walz, joined local criticism, expressing outrage and saying the state will ensure a thorough investigation.  

Multiple investigations are now underway, including inquiries by state authorities and federal agencies, to determine whether the use of deadly force was justified and to establish the full circumstances surrounding the incident.  

Community Response and Wider Implications

Residents and activists have expressed profound anger and grief, with many calling the shooting symbolic of broader issues around federal enforcement tactics. Demonstrations at the scene have drawn sharp criticism of ICE’s presence in Minneapolis, and political figures on both sides of the aisle are weighing in as the case unfolds.  

The shooting has reignited debates over law enforcement’s authority to fire on moving vehicles, especially in crowded urban settings, and has raised broader questions about how federal immigration operations intersect with local community safety. national civil rights groups have also called for transparency and accountability.  

Attached is a News article regarding ICE officers killing a women in her car in Minneapolis 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c7510l1135wt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News



Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

UK Geography Teacher Found Guilty of Sexual Abuse of Pupils

A former geography teacher has been convicted at Plymouth Crown Court on multiple counts of sexual abuse and indecency involving female pupils, in a case that has shocked the local community and highlighted ongoing concerns around safeguarding in schools.

Anthony Redmond, 54, was found guilty on eight counts of sexual abuse relating to his conduct with two female students while teaching at a school in Plymouth during the 2000s. The offences occurred in several locations, including school premises, a hotel, and his own home. On one occasion, the court heard that an abuse incident took place in a school cupboard — intensifying the distressing nature of the case. 

Details of the Case

The prosecution successfully proved that Redmond engaged in sexual activities with both pupils, including taking the virginity of each girl, despite his repeated denials of guilt. Several of the charges included abuse of a position of trust, a serious offence under UK law designed to protect children from exploitation by adults in authority. 

One of the victims gave a powerful impact statement to the court, saying she had been left feeling “used and worthless” as a result of Redmond’s actions. 

Legal Process and Next Steps

Redmond maintained his innocence throughout the trial, but a jury convicted him following a full hearing. He has since been granted bail ahead of his sentencing scheduled for 10 February. A pre-sentence report has been ordered at his lawyer’s request — a standard procedure where the judge seeks background information to help determine the appropriate sentence. 

Broader Context

Cases of teachers abusing their position of trust are taken extremely seriously in the UK. When convicted, individuals face potential imprisonment, placement on the sex offenders register, and prohibition from working with children. They also contribute to broader efforts to strengthen safeguarding measures across schools and educational settings to protect young people from predatory behaviour. Redmond’s conviction adds to a growing number of high-profile cases in recent years involving educators found guilty of sexual misconduct or grooming relating to pupils. 

Attached is a News article regarding a teacher called Anthony redmond convicted of having sex with pupils 

https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/world-news/teacher-caught-sickening-sex-act-36512648.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Threatens to Arrest Zohran Mamdani if He Obstructs ICE Operations in New York

In a heated escalation of the ongoing national debate over immigration and federal authority, President Donald Trump publicly warned that he would pursue the arrest of Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral nominee for New York City, should Mamdani attempt to block or interfere with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations.

Speaking during a July 2025 news briefing while visiting a federal migrant detention facility in Florida, Trump directly targeted Mamdani’s campaign pledge to protect immigrant communities from aggressive federal enforcement actions. When asked how he would respond if Mamdani followed through on his promise to curtail ICE’s activities, the president stated flatly: “Well then, we’ll have to arrest him.”  

Trump, who has consistently taken a hard line on immigration enforcement throughout his presidency, framed his remarks as an assertion of federal authority. He suggested that any attempt by a city mayor to obstruct federal law enforcement — particularly in carrying out arrests of undocumented immigrants — could be met with swift legal action by the Justice Department.  

The president’s comments also included unfounded personal attacks and accusations about Mamdani’s political ideology and background, language that drew sharp rebukes from Mamdani and his supporters. Mamdani, a state legislator and democratic socialist who moved to the United States as a child, responded that the threat was an attempt to intimidate him and discourage civic engagement. He called the remarks “an attack on our democracy,” saying he would not be deterred from defending New York’s immigrant residents.  

Clash Over Sanctuary Policies

New York City — and the state at large — has been at the forefront of sanctuary policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Mamdani’s campaign has emphasized protecting immigrant rights and resisting federal incursions that critics say undermine trust between communities and local authorities.  

Federal law generally vests immigration enforcement authority in agencies such as ICE, but sanctuary cities push back by restricting local cooperation. Legal experts note that while mayors cannot legally block federal agents from performing their duties, clashes over jurisdiction and enforcement often wind up in court. Trump’s threat to arrest Mamdani underscored the contentious nature of these jurisdictional conflicts.  

Political and Legal Backdrop

The confrontation is unfolding against a backdrop of heightened tensions between federal immigration officials and progressive city leaders. Trump’s administration has ramped up ICE operations in major cities, prompting protests and legal challenges. In New York, activists and politicians have rallied to resist what they describe as a heavy-handed federal crackdown in a city deeply rooted in immigrant history.  

While Trump’s rhetoric was forceful, many legal scholars say that the practical likelihood of a sitting mayor being arrested simply for opposing ICE policies remains low — absent clear evidence of unlawful obstruction. The clash is emblematic of broader political battles over federal immigration policy, local autonomy, and the rule of law in a deeply divided political climate.

Attached is a news article regarding Mandani will be arrested if he stops ICE operations in New York 

https://www.axios.com/2025/07/01/trump-mamdani-arrest-ice-immigration

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

US Seizes Russian-Flagged Tanker in Atlantic as UK Confirms Support for Operation

The United States has seized a Russian-flagged oil tanker in the North Atlantic in a high-profile maritime operation that has drawn sharp criticism from Moscow and highlighted growing Western efforts to clamp down on sanctions evasion. The UK government has confirmed it provided support to the mission at Washington’s request.

The vessel, reportedly operating under the name Marinera, was intercepted by U.S. forces after being tracked across the Atlantic for more than two weeks. American officials say the tanker was part of a so-called “shadow fleet” used to move sanctioned oil while obscuring ownership, flag registration and cargo origin. The tanker had allegedly changed names and flags multiple times in recent years, a tactic commonly associated with attempts to bypass international sanctions.

According to the U.S. Coast Guard, the operation was carried out under existing sanctions enforcement powers, with the tanker suspected of transporting oil in violation of U.S. restrictions linked to Russian and Venezuelan energy exports. The crew has been detained and may face legal proceedings, although U.S. officials have yet to confirm specific charges.

The UK Ministry of Defence confirmed that British forces provided logistical and intelligence support to the operation. This included aerial surveillance by RAF aircraft and coordination at sea, though the UK stressed that American forces led the seizure itself. A government spokesperson said the support was provided “in full compliance with international law” and formed part of the UK’s broader commitment to countering sanctions evasion and protecting maritime security.

Russia has condemned the seizure, accusing the United States of acting unlawfully on the high seas. Russian officials argued that the tanker was legally registered and that the operation set a dangerous precedent for international shipping. Washington has rejected these claims, maintaining that the vessel’s registration status was unclear and that there was sufficient evidence of sanctions violations.

The incident underscores intensifying enforcement efforts by the U.S. and its allies against networks used to move sanctioned oil, particularly as revenues from energy exports remain critical to Russia’s war economy. Analysts say the operation also sends a strong signal to shipping operators and insurers that Western governments are prepared to take direct action against vessels suspected of evading sanctions.

Beyond the immediate diplomatic fallout, the seizure highlights the deepening security cooperation between the U.S. and the UK at a time of heightened geopolitical tension. As sanctions enforcement becomes increasingly assertive, further confrontations at sea may test the boundaries of international maritime law and escalate disputes between major powers.

Attached is a news article regarding the US seizes Russian flagged ship tanker in Atlantic 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cwynjdqgellt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored hy smileband, 

Man Fined for Posing as Army Veteran at Remembrance Day Service

A man who falsely claimed to be a member of the British Army has been fined after being exposed for wearing fake military medals and posing as a decorated serviceman at a Remembrance Day ceremony.

The incident occurred during a public Remembrance Day service, where the man was seen wearing full military-style clothing along with medals he had not earned. Witnesses, including genuine veterans and serving personnel, became suspicious after noticing inaccuracies in the uniform and the medals displayed.

An investigation later confirmed that the man had never served in the British Army or any branch of the armed forces. Despite this, he attended the solemn event, which is held each year to honour those who have served and died in military conflicts, presenting himself as a former soldier.

The court heard that the man’s actions caused significant distress and anger among veterans and families attending the service. Prosecutors described his behaviour as “deeply disrespectful,” particularly given the emotional significance of Remembrance Day for the armed forces community.

He was found guilty of wearing military decorations without entitlement, an offence under UK law, and was fined by the court. The judge stated that impersonating a serviceman undermines public trust and disrespects those who have made genuine sacrifices for their country.

Veterans’ organisations welcomed the ruling, saying it sent a strong message that so-called “stolen valour” would not be tolerated in the UK. They stressed that Remembrance Day is a time for reflection, respect, and honour—not personal attention or deception.

Police have since reminded the public that wearing military medals or uniforms without authorisation, particularly at official events, can be a criminal offence and may result in prosecution.

Attached is a news article regarding a man posing as a army officer at remembrance veterans day 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78e548p9nno.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Venezuela: A Hub for Very Dangerous Criminal Gangs

In recent years, Venezuela has increasingly been described by international officials and experts as a centre of activity for some of the Western Hemisphere’s most dangerous criminal organisations. Once known primarily for its oil wealth and political turbulence, the country’s power vacuum, economic collapse and weakened rule of law have transformed it into fertile ground for violent gangs and transnational criminal networks.

Political Instability and Criminal Power

The crisis gripping Venezuela is not only political but intensely criminal. British and other Western figures have explicitly warned that the country has become a hub for dangerous criminals, complicating diplomatic efforts and exerting a spill-over effect across the region.  

During the chaotic recent U.S. operation that resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, it was again highlighted how deeply intertwined criminal networks are with the Venezuelan state and security situation.  

Mega-Gangs and Narco-Networks

Among the most notorious groups are so-called “megabandas” — large, heavily armed gangs that operate with little interference. These organisations routinely engage in drug trafficking, extortion, kidnappings, and contract killings. Many emerged from Venezuela’s densely populated urban barrios, exploiting weakened law enforcement and social breakdown.  

The Tren de Aragua gang, once confined to the overcrowded Tocorón prison, is among the most infamous. Originally a prison gang, it has expanded its reach throughout Venezuela and into other Latin American countries. Tren de Aragua’s activities include extortion, human trafficking, commercial crime syndicates and drug distribution — operations so expansive that they have drawn U.S. law enforcement and overseas indictments.  

State Links and International Ties

Venezuela’s criminal landscape is complicated by allegations of collusion between some officials and illegal networks. A recent U.S. indictment against Maduro and several high-ranking figures accused them of enriching themselves through alliances with cartels and Venezuelan gangs, including using state infrastructure to facilitate drug shipments.  

International groups — including Colombian guerilla remnants such as the ELN and dissident FARC factions — also operate along border regions, integrating into drug and smuggling routes. Domestic criminal organisations frequently navigate and exploit these porous frontiers.  

Wider Social Impact

The presence of criminal gangs has deeply affected everyday Venezuelan life. In cities like Caracas and Maracaibo, local gangs exert control over neighbourhoods, often outgunning police, and contribute to chronic insecurity and public fear. In some cases, militias and “colectivos” — political paramilitary groups allied with the former regime — have blurred lines between political violence and criminal conduct.  

Regional and Global Reach

What was once a primarily domestic problem is now a regional security concern. Venezuelan criminal networks have been implicated in cocaine trafficking routes that stretch into Europe and the United States, teaming up with Islamist militants and African criminal groups in some smuggling corridors.  

Reports from Brazil and other neighbours document the spread of Venezuelan gangs across borders, where they engage in turf wars and integrate with local criminal factions — a trend that underlines how the country’s internal decay has external consequences.  

Conclusion

Venezuela’s descent into chaos has created fertile ground for very dangerous and powerful criminal gangs. From sprawling urban megabandas to transnational networks like Tren de Aragua, these groups have filled vacuums left by weakened institutions, profiting from drug routes, exploitation, and violence. The impacts are felt not just within Venezuela’s borders, but across Latin America and into Europe and the United States — making the problem one of international urgency.

Attached is a News Article on the uk government addressing Venezuela was a hub for very dangerous criminal gangs 

https://news.sky.com/story/politics-latest-keir-starmer-pressed-on-extra-bank-holiday-if-england-win-the-euros-12593360

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Tuesday, 6 January 2026

Smileband News

 


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband

China Demands U.S. Immediately Release Maduro, Condemns ‘Violation’ of Sovereignty

Beijing, January 7, 2026 — China has issued a forceful diplomatic rebuke of the United States after Caracas’ President Nicolás Maduro and his wife were seized in a bold U.S. operation and flown to New York to face federal charges. Beijing urged Washington to release Maduro and his wife at once, warning that the U.S. action violates international law and undermines global norms on sovereignty and non-interference.  

At a regular press briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning stated that the United States’ prosecution of Maduro — a sitting head of state — in a U.S. domestic court is “a clear violation of Venezuela’s sovereignty and international law.” She reiterated that China wants Maduro and his wife freed immediately and their safety guaranteed, calling on Washington to resolve the crisis through political dialogue rather than force. 


China’s criticism goes beyond a single statement. Officials have framed the U.S. operation as hegemonic behaviour that tramples on the United Nations Charter’s core principles — including sovereign equality and non-interference in internal affairs — and threatens peace in Latin America and the wider world. At a United Nations Security Council session this week, Chinese delegates echoed these themes, denouncing what they described as unilateral U.S. military action and demanding the immediate release of Maduro and his wife.  

Chinese diplomats also expressed concern that the precedent set by the U.S. capture of a foreign leader could be exploited by other powers in ways that destabilise global order. Beijing has stressed that no country should act as “the world’s judge or policeman,” and reaffirmed its official policy of resolving disputes through negotiation and adherence to international law.  

The diplomatic clash comes amid extraordinary turmoil following the U.S. military operation in Venezuela. Maduro was captured by U.S. special forces in Caracas and transported to New York, where he has pleaded not guilty to federal narcotics and weapons charges. The raid provoked widespread debate globally, with Russia also condemning the U.S. action as a violation of international norms.  

China’s vocal response underscores the growing geopolitical tensions between Beijing and Washington. While analysts say China is unlikely to escalate beyond diplomatic protest, its stance signals an assertive pushback against U.S. actions that it views as undermining the sovereign rights of other nations and the international legal order.  

Attached is a news article regarding china told to release maduro with immediate affect 


Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36












Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Living as One: The Unique Lives of Conjoined Twins

Conjoined twins are among the rarest and most medically complex births in the world. Occurring in approximately one in every 200,000 live births, conjoined twins are identical twins who are physically connected at birth, sharing parts of their bodies or vital organs. Their lives differ profoundly from those of other people, not because of who they are, but because of the extraordinary physical, medical, and social realities they face every day.

Unlike most individuals, conjoined twins must navigate life in constant physical proximity to another person. This shared existence shapes everything—from movement and personal space to decision-making and independence. While most people take autonomy for granted, conjoined twins must cooperate in even the simplest tasks, such as walking, sleeping, eating, or choosing where to go. Every action is a joint effort, requiring communication, patience, and compromise.

Medically, the challenges are significant. Many conjoined twins share organs such as the liver, intestines, or even parts of the heart or brain. This makes routine healthcare more complicated and increases the risk of infections, chronic pain, or organ failure. Surgical separation, when possible, carries immense risk and is often debated not just medically but ethically. In many cases, separation may endanger one or both twins, forcing families and doctors to make heartbreaking decisions early in life.

Beyond the physical realities, conjoined twins experience a vastly different social world. Public curiosity can be overwhelming. From stares in public places to intrusive questions and media attention, they often grow up under a spotlight most people never experience. This can lead to social isolationanxiety, or a strong desire for privacy. At the same time, some conjoined twins choose to embrace public life, using their visibility to educate others and challenge misconceptions about disability and difference.

Education and employment also present unique hurdles. Schools and workplaces are rarely designed with conjoined twins in mind. Simple logistics—such as desk space, transportation, or accessibility—can become daily obstacles. Yet many conjoined twins go on to achieve academic success, build careers, and pursue creative or intellectual passions, proving that physical difference does not limit ambition or capability.

Emotionally, the bond between conjoined twins is unlike any other human relationship. They are siblings, companions, and lifelong partners rolled into one. While disagreements and frustrations naturally occur, many describe a deep sense of connection and understanding that surpasses ordinary relationships. For them, individuality does not disappear—it evolves. Each twin develops their own personality, preferences, and dreams, even while sharing a body.

Compared to what society often labels as “normal” life, the lives of conjoined twins reveal how narrow that definition can be. Their experiences challenge assumptions about independence, identity, and what it means to live fully. Rather than being defined by limitation, many conjoined twins redefine resiliencecooperation, and humanity itself.

In a world that often struggles to accept difference, conjoined twins remind us that human life does not come in a single standard form. Their lives may be different, but they are no less meaningful—rich with complexity, strength, and an extraordinary perspective on what it means to be human.

Attached is a news article regarding conjoined twins 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/conjoined-twin-who-survived-separation-36461771.amp 

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Smileband News

Dear 222 Mews viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Norfolk Couple Ordered to Repay £3 Million Over Ed Sheeran Ticket Touting Fraud A Norfolk co...