Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

In early October 2025, a new chapter opened in the sprawling intersection of celebrity, justice, and presidential power: music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs—having recently been convicted on federal charges and sentenced to 50 months in prison—asked former President Donald Trump to consider a presidential pardon or commutation.  

Here’s a detailed breakdown of the situation, the stakes, and the broader implications.

Background: The conviction and sentencing

• In 2025, Combs was tried in the Southern District of New York. He faced charges including racketeering, sex-trafficking by force, and transportation for purposes of prostitution.  

• Ultimately, the jury acquitted him of the more serious racketeering and sex-trafficking counts but found him guilty on two counts of transportation for the purposes of prostitution (related to moving individuals for prostitution) under the federal Mann Act.  

• On October 3, 2025, he was sentenced to 50 months (just over four years) in prison plus a fine of $500,000.  

So we have a high-profile celebrity, convicted of serious but not the top-level predicted charges, now appealing decisions and exploring clemency.

Trump’s Role & Pardon Request

• Trump publicly acknowledged that Combs’s legal team has asked him for clemency: “A lot of people have asked me for pardons… I call him Puff Daddy; he has asked me for a pardon.”  

• In earlier months (May and August 2025) Trump gave mixed statements. In May he said he would “look at the facts” if someone had been mistreated.  

• In August, Trump suggested the pardon would be more difficult because Combs — once friendly — later became “very hostile” after Trump ran for office. “Makes it more… I’m being honest, makes it more difficult to do.”  

• Recent reports (October 21–22) indicate conflicting signals: A tabloid reported Trump was “vacillating” and might commute the sentence soon, but the White House officially denied the claim that any decision was imminent or under serious consideration.  

Why This Matters

1. Use of Presidential Clemency

Presidential pardons and commutations are controversial in any era. A pardon or commutation for a figure like Combs raises questions about fairness, influence, and the optics of celebrity justice.

2. Political Implications

• Trump’s decision could be interpreted as favoring a celebrity ally or as intervening on grounds of fairness.

• It also reflects on his sense of loyalty, personal relationships, and how he weighs political vs. legal/ethical factors.

3. Public Perception & Legal Precedent

• The optics: A billionaire entertainer asking for leniency.

• Legal precedent: How often do such high-profile celebrity clemencies occur? What message does it send to the justice system?

• Impact on victims and public trust: Those harmed by the crimes may view a pardon as undermining justice.

4. Timing & Strategy

• Combs is in federal prison, has appealed parts of his conviction, and his team is working his clemency effort.

• Trump is in the mix of other pardon decisions (e.g., the recent commutation of former congressman George Santos) which may influence both precedent and public expectations.  

Possible Scenarios & Outcomes

Scenario A: Trump grants a pardon or commutation

• Combs would be released or have his sentence reduced significantly.

• Trump could claim to be correcting a “mistreatment” or “over-punishment.”

• Backlash: Critics would argue it’s favoritism, undermining the rule of law; victims may feel justice was denied.

• Supporters: Might argue Truman-style clemency for inequitable sentences or unfair prosecutions.

Scenario B: Trump denies clemency

• Maintains the position that conviction stands and no pardon is warranted.

• Could be seen as upholding accountability regardless of celebrity.

• Might disappoint Combs’s camp and cause personal/brand friction.

Scenario C: Decision delayed / no action

• Leaves the matter unresolved and hanging, creating ambiguity and further speculation.

• Allows both sides to posture but not commit.

Considerations and Constraints

• The President’s power to pardon federal crimes is broad but political. Past pardons often consider factors like rehabilitation, service, remorse, disproportionate sentence. It’s unclear how much Combs’s case aligns with those.

• Trump himself has noted Combs’s past statements and relationship changes as complicating factors.  

• The White House denies active consideration, meaning the official position remains ambiguous. If the public believes the pardon decision is influenced by celebrity or money, trust may erode.

• There’s also the personal dimension: Combs and Trump had a friendly relationship prior to politics, but that shifted. That dynamic may influence whether Trump sees a reason to act.

What to Watch Next

• Official announcement (or lack thereof) of clemency decision.

• Any filing for executive pardon or commutation by Combs’s legal team.

• Public statements by Trump or the White House clarifying reasoning.

• Reaction from victims, advocacy groups, legal community.

• Impact on Trump’s broader pardon/executive-clemency strategy and reputation.

In Conclusion

The potential pardon of Sean “Diddy” Combs by Donald Trump is not just a celebrity legal story—it’s a microcosm of broader tensions: justice vs privilege, the power of the presidency, and the influence of public perception. Whether Trump grants clemency or not, the decision (or indecision) will signal something significant about how such powers are used—or constrained—in the modern era.

Attached is a news article regarding p diddy pardoned by Donald Trump 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna238847

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Teenage Killer Harvey Willgoose Named by Judge After Brutal Attack

In a shocking turn of events, a judge has lifted the anonymity order protecting the identity of teenage killer Harvey Willgoose, allowing the public to finally learn the name behind one of the most disturbing crimes of recent years.

Harvey Willgoose, aged 17, was convicted of murdering another teenager in a frenzied and unprovoked attack that sent shockwaves through his local community. The crime, described by prosecutors as “cold-blooded and remorseless,” took place in broad daylight, leaving residents horrified at the level of violence committed by someone so young.

The court heard that Willgoose, who had a history of violent behaviour and obsession with knives, attacked his victim without warning. Witnesses described scenes of chaos as the victim, also a teenager, tried desperately to escape. Emergency services were called to the scene, but despite their efforts, the victim was pronounced dead shortly after arrival at hospital.

During sentencing, the judge condemned Willgoose’s “utter lack of remorse” and “deeply troubling fascination with violence.” The decision to reveal his name came after careful consideration, with the judge ruling that the public had a right to know the identity of such a dangerous individual, even though he was under 18 at the time of the offence.

“Harvey Willgoose represents a grave threat to society,” the judge stated. “The brutality of his actions, combined with his complete absence of empathy, demand transparency. The public must be aware of the severity of his crimes.”

Family members of the victim expressed relief that Willgoose could finally be named, saying it marked the first step towards justice and closure. “For too long, we’ve had to watch his face hidden while our child’s name was everywhere,” one family member said outside court. “Now, everyone will know who he really is and what he’s done.”

Willgoose has been sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of at least 15 years before he will be eligible for parole. The court also heard chilling details of his online activity, which included violent videos and disturbing social media posts glorifying aggression.

The case has reignited debates over youth violence, knife crime, and whether anonymity should continue to protect young offenders who commit the most serious crimes. Campaigners are calling for stronger intervention measures in schools and communities to prevent teenagers from spiralling into violence.

Attached is a news article regarding Harvey willgoose killer name by judge 

https://news.sky.com/story/boy-15-who-murdered-harvey-willgoose-sentenced-to-life-with-minimum-term-of-16-years-13454896

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Daylight Tragedy: The Lee Rugby Case That Shook the Nation

In what has been described as one of the most shocking daylight incidents in recent memory, the town of Lee has been left reeling after a violent altercation erupted near a local rugby ground, ending in tragedy. The event, now referred to as the Lee Rugby Case, unfolded in full public view, leaving witnesses horrified and authorities scrambling for answers.

According to early reports, the incident took place during the early afternoon when the area was bustling with families and sports fans. A dispute, believed to have started near the sidelines, quickly escalated into a violent confrontation. Eyewitnesses described chaotic scenes as emergency services rushed to the location, where one individual was found critically injured. Despite the swift arrival of paramedics, the victim was later pronounced dead at the scene.

Police have since launched a major investigation, cordoning off the area for several hours while forensic teams collected evidence. Officers confirmed that multiple people were involved and that arrests have already been made in connection with the incident. However, they are appealing for anyone with video footage or information to come forward to help piece together the sequence of events.

The tragedy has sparked widespread shock and sadness across the community. Local residents have been laying flowers and tributes outside the rugby club, while coaches and players expressed their disbelief that such violence could occur in a place associated with teamwork and sportsmanship.

A spokesperson for the club released a statement saying, “We are deeply saddened by what has happened. Our hearts go out to the victim’s family and everyone affected by this unimaginable tragedy. The club will be cooperating fully with the authorities as investigations continue.”

Community leaders have also called for calm and unity, urging residents not to let fear or anger divide the town. The Lee Rugby Case serves as a sobering reminder of how quickly everyday moments can turn into scenes of devastation — and how communities must stand together in the face of senseless violence.

Police are expected to release further details in the coming days as the investigation continues. For now, the town of Lee mourns — its sense of safety shattered by a tragedy that unfolded in broad daylight.

222 News sends out full condolences to the family of Lee rigby as his murder was a horrible incident that shocked the whole of Woolwich. 

Attached is a news article regarding Lee rigby case a daylight tragedy 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25450555.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Background — The Student Debt Landscape

The U.S. student-loan system has been under intense scrutiny for years: trillions in federal loan debt, millions of borrowers struggling to repay, and various federal repayment and forgiveness programs that many borrowers found difficult to navigate.

Earlier this year, the Biden Administration announced multiple rounds of debt cancellation (for example targeting defrauded students, permanently disabled borrowers, etc.), and had sought broad “mass forgiveness” using executive authority.  

However, in June 2023 the Supreme Court of the United States struck down a major Biden-era plan to cancel student debt for up to ~40 million borrowers.  

In the interim, there has been a legal and administrative tug-of-war over income-driven repayment programs (IDR), the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (PSLF), and how/when forgiveness should be implemented.

What’s the New Agreement?

In October 2025, the Department of Education and the AFT reached a legal settlement/agreement under the case AFT v. U.S. Department of Education, which sets out a roadmap by which the federal government will:

• Resume processing and approving loan cancellations for borrowers enrolled in certain income-driven repayment (IDR) plans, specifically the Income‑Contingent Repayment (ICR) and Pay As You Earn (PAYE) plans.  

• Refund borrowers who made payments after they already qualified for forgiveness but before the processing was completed.  

• Protect eligible borrowers from receiving a tax bill on the forgiven amount — for debts cancelled on or before December 31, 2025, the forgiven balances will not be treated as taxable income.  

• Provide transparency: require the Department to submit monthly (or six monthly) progress reports detailing the pace of discharges, the processing of applications, and the backlog.  

• Apply to borrowers who have been long-enrolled in these programs and have made the required years of payments. The estimate of those affected is in the millions (some sources point to ~2–2.5 million borrowers in the two plans combined).  

In short: this agreement marks a shift from a period of stalling/cancellation of IDR processing towards an active commitment to discharge debt for qualifying borrowers under specified programs.

Why This Matters

Relief for stranded borrowers. Many borrowers have been in these IDR plans for decades, making what they believed were qualifying payments only to find themselves still owing large balances or trapped by administrative delays. This agreement offers a pathway to finally clear those.

Tax-treatment clarity. One of the major concerns was that even if forgiveness is granted, the canceled amount could be taxed as income (which would create a huge tax bill). By declaring that cancellations occurring by the end of 2025 will not trigger such tax consequences, the deal removes a major barrier.  

Administrative accountability & transparency. By requiring progress reports and oversight, the Agreement seeks to ensure the process isn’t just announced but actually executed.

Political/administrative pivot. This marks a noticeable policy shift: after legal setbacks and criticism for stalling, the White House/ED is committing to move forward and honour long-held commitments under IDR/PSLF programs.

Who is Eligible / Key Features to Know

• Borrowers enrolled in ICR or PAYE plans (two specific types of income-driven repayment).  

• Borrowers who have made the required number of payments under those plans (typically 20–25 years, depending on when loans were taken out and plan rules) and meet other eligibility criteria.  

• Borrowers who made payments after the point at which they qualified for forgiveness (before it was processed) may receive refunds.  

• Borrowers whose debt is cancelled on or before December 31, 2025 will not have the forgiven amount taxed.  

Limitations and Open Questions

• The agreement still awaits court approval to become legally binding.  

• This is not a mass-cancellation of all student debt or the broad cancellation that some advocates had sought; it is focused on specific programs (ICR, PAYE) and those who have met long-standing eligibility.

• Borrowers not enrolled in those qualifying plans or who do not meet the long payment-history/eligibility may not benefit under this agreement.

• Implementation remains a concern: processing, backlog clear-out, accurate tracking and timely disbursement are all still to be seen.

• Although the tax relief condition covers forgiveness by Dec 31 2025, what happens for those whose paperwork/process finishes later remains subject to possible tax risk or further rules.

• Because student-loan policy is politically charged, future administrations or Congress may alter rules or create uncertainty around long-term durability of the commitments.

Potential Impact

The agreement could relieve millions of borrowers of burdensome student debt, especially those who have been repaying for decades under IDR plans but still owe large balances. Some estimated figures: >2 million borrowers in the two targeted IDR plans.  

By reducing repaying burdens, this relief may free up borrowers to spend on housing, saving, entrepreneurship, etc., which could have broader economic ripple effects.

However, because this is not sweeping cancellation, and because it focuses on specific groups, the overall outstanding student-debt burden (currently over $1 trillion in U.S. federal student loans) will remain largely unaddressed in total. The relief therefore is significant for eligible individuals, but partial in scope.

Why the Shift?

Several factors likely contributed:

• Legal pressure: The AFT lawsuit challenged the government’s failure to process forgiveness for eligible borrowers, leading to the settlement.

• Political and reputational pressure: Borrowers have long complained of being trapped in repayment loops, and institutions (including unions, advocacy groups) have been vocal.

• Tax-law change looming: There was concern for a “tax bomb” if the forgiven debt were treated as taxable. The agreement addresses that.  

• Administrative reset: After years of contested policy (IDR reform, mass forgiveness attempts, pandemic payment pause, etc.), the administration may be seeking a more stable, legally defensible path.

What Borrowers Should Do

If you are a borrower, keep the following in mind:

• Check whether you are enrolled in one of the qualifying plans (ICR or PAYE).

• Confirm how many years of qualifying payments you’ve made; if you believe you’ve already met the requirement, you may soon be eligible for discharge under the agreement.

• Monitor communications from the Department of Education or your student-loan servicer for notices of forgiveness, or for options to file/refile any necessary paperwork.

• Be mindful of the Dec 31 2025 deadline for tax-safe discharge; act proactively to avoid being caught in processing delays.

• Keep documentation of your payments, correspondence, and plan enrollment status in case of dispute.

• Watch for updates: court approval is pending, and the implementation timeline may shift.

Conclusion

This agreement between the White House (via the Department of Education) and the AFT represents a meaningful milestone for student-loan relief: rather than broad, sweeping cancellation, it targets long-awaited relief for borrowers of specific IDR plans who have made decades of payments. It addresses both administrative inertia and tax-related concerns, providing a clearer path forward for eligible borrowers.

That said, the relief is not universally applicable, and full implementation remains to be seen. For millions of borrowers who have been navigating the repayment system for years, however, this offers hope that their burdens may finally ease.

Attached is a news article regarding the White House cancellation of student debt 

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/10/19/trump-student-loan-forgiveness.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Case at a Glance

Mohammed Zahid, aged 65 and also known by the moniker “Boss Man”, has been sentenced to 35 years in prison for his central role in a grooming gang that exploited two highly vulnerable teenage girls in the town of Rochdale (Greater Manchester) between 2001 and 2006.  

Zahid operated a lingerie stall at the local indoor market, where he used his position to groom and exploit the victims.  

The Offences and Operation

• The two girls in the case (referred to in court as “Girl A” and “Girl B”) were just 13 years old when the abuse began.  

• Zahid and his co-accused gave the victims gifts, free underwear from the stall, money, food and alcohol in order to manipulate them into sexual activity.  

• The abuse occurred in multiple locations: filthy flats, cars, car parks, alleyways and other indoor/outdoor spaces.  

• At trial, prosecutors emphasised Zahid’s sense of impunity: they depicted him as believing he was “almost untouchable”.  

Co-convicted individuals

Six other men were convicted alongside Zahid of related sexual offences. Some of their sentences:

• Kasir Bashir: 29 years (fled the country before trial).  

• Mushtaq Ahmed: 27 years.  

• Mohammed Shahzad: 26 years.  

• Naheem Akram: 26 years.  

• Nisar Hussain: 19 years.  

• Roheez Khan: 12 years.  

Institutional Failures and Vulnerability

A key component of the case is the role of the victims’ backgrounds and the failings of the system meant to protect them:

• Both girls had “deeply troubled home lives” and were already known to social services and other agencies.  

• One of the victims had been described in a social-services document as having “prostituted herself at 10 years old”.  

• Despite this, the court found that the perpetrators continued their abuse for years, highlighting profound failures in oversight. Judge Jonathan Seely said that “both girls were seriously let down by those whose job it was to protect them.”  

Why This Sentence Matters

• The 35-year sentence for Zahid marks a very significant punishment in the UK for this type of criminal exploitation.

• It sends a message about the gravity of organised, long-term child sexual exploitation (CSE) and the culpability of leadership within grooming rings.

• The case continues the broader scrutiny of CSE rings within the UK and has renewed calls for better safeguarding, earlier intervention and systemic reform.

Commentary and Reflection

This case is tragic on many levels: the youth and vulnerability of the victims, the brazen nature of the offenders, and the repeated failures of agencies to intervene early. Some key reflections:

• Victim impact: One of the victims described how the abuse “has affected every part of my life… what I look like, relationships, health, to my mental health.”  

• Grooming methods: The offenders used a range of manipulative tactics—gifts, money, alcohol, free items, friendship—and then imposed sexual demands. This pattern of grooming is now well-documented in such exploitation cases.

• Location and role of the stall: Zahid’s market stall gave him access and a facade of normality which he abused. It demonstrates how exploiters embed themselves in everyday settings.

• Systemic challenge: The fact that the victims were known to care services and still came to harm underscores the complexity and seriousness of safeguarding these children.

• Justice served – but long road ahead: While the convictions are a milestone, the ongoing consequences for the victims are long-term. Rehabilitation, support, and healing will take many years.

What Comes Next

• Supporting the victims in long-term recovery is crucial: mental-health services, counselling, and social support will be essential.

• Monitoring release and managing risk: Though 35 years is a long sentence, ensuring the offender cannot harm others in the future remains vital.

• System reform: Learning from the case to strengthen early identification, proactive intervention, and inter-agency coordination.

• Public awareness and prevention: Recognising the signs of grooming and exploitation in communities, schools and care settings.

• Further investigations: This is part of a broader investigation in Rochdale by Greater Manchester Police (GMP) under, among others, “Operation Lytton”.  

In Summary

Mohammed Zahid’s conviction and 35-year sentence highlight a deeply disturbing chapter of sexual exploitation in Rochdale. The brutality of the crimes, the vulnerability of the victims, and the systemic failings laid bare in court combine to make this a case of serious gravity. At the same time, the sentence offers a measure of justice, though it does not erase the damage done. What remains is the challenge of rebuilding lives and ensuring such exploitation is prevented going forward.

Attached is a news article regarding the Rochdale ring leader jailed for 35 years 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/oct/01/rochdale-manchester-grooming-girls-sex-slaves-court

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smielband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Breakthrough in Orthopaedics: China’s “Bone-Glue” for Rapid Fracture Repair

A research team in China has introduced a promising new adhesive, dubbed Bone‑02, which reportedly can fix broken or shattered bones in around 2–3 minutes with a single injection.   Below is a detailed look at how it works, why it may matter, and what questions remain.

1. What is Bone-02?

• Developed by a team led by Lin Xianfeng, an associate chief orthopaedic surgeon at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province.  

• The adhesive is inspired by how oysters cling firmly to wet surfaces — the researchers sought to replicate that adhesive strength in the wet, blood-rich environment of bone fractures.  

• It is described as an injectable biomaterial: via a small (2–3 cm) incision, the glue is injected into the fracture site, then cures/hardens in about 2–3 minutes to secure the fragments.  

• Laboratory metrics: It reportedly achieves a bonding force of over 400 pounds, shear strength ~0.5 MPa, compressive strength ~10 MPa.  

• Additional key feature: It is bioabsorbable — meaning, once the bone heals, the glue material is naturally absorbed by the body, eliminating the need for a second surgery to remove hardware.  

2. Why this matters

• Faster surgery / less invasive: Traditional bone fracture repair often requires open surgery, placement of metal plates and screws, long operating time, risks of infection, and often another operation for hardware removal. The glue promises to shorten the procedure dramatically.  

• Reduced foreign-hardware complications: Metal implants can cause discomfort, stress shielding, infection, metal allergy issues, and often necessitate removal. A glue that is absorbed removes that long-term foreign body burden.  

• Potential for complex fractures: The adhesive formulation claims to handle not just simple fractures but also comminuted ones (bones broken into many fragments) by bonding them in situ.  

• Broad implications: If validated, this could shift orthopaedic practice toward more minimally invasive interventions, lower hospital time, faster recovery, and possibly lower cost.

3. How it works – Mechanism & procedure

• Inspiration from nature: Oysters create underwater adhesive proteins that set even in water and hold against shear and erosion. The research team used this insight to design a glue that works in a moist, blood-filled fracture site.  

• Application: A small incision (≈2-3 cm) is made, the glue is injected into the fracture gap and around fragments, and in ~3 minutes it sets and stabilises the fragments.  

• Absorption: Over time, as the patient’s bone heals, the glue material is gradually resorbed by the body (reports suggest ~6 months). Thus, the glue acts as a temporary fixation scaffold rather than permanent hardware.  

4. Current status & evidence

• According to Chinese media reports, Bone-02 has been tested in more than 150 patients so far.  

• One reported case: a wrist fracture fixed in under 3 minutes with the glue rather than a plate and screws.  

• Lab testing shows promising mechanical strength and biocompatibility parameters (as above) in controlled settings.

5. Limitations & open questions

While the breakthrough is exciting, there are several caveats and questions before it becomes routine:

• Published peer-review data: The reports so far are mainly media‐based, summarising clinical use and lab metrics. It’s unclear how many full clinical trials (with long-term follow-up, multiple centres, randomised controls) have been published.

• Long-term outcomes: How do glued fractures fare at 1-2-5 years compared to traditional plates/screws? What about healing quality, re-fracture risk, bone strength, function?

• Scope & limitations: Which fracture types is this suitable for? E.g., load-bearing long bones (femur, tibia) vs smaller bones (wrist, ankle)? Are there anatomical/fragmentation constraints?

• Regulatory/approval status outside China: It’s unclear how far the adhesive is in terms of regulatory approval (in China and internationally). Adoption in practice may lag.

• Cost & accessibility: Will the new method be cost-effective compared to traditional implants? Will it require specialised equipment/training. 

• Risk & complications: While bioabsorbable glue removes hardware, are there new risks (e.g., glue failure, delayed absorption, adverse reactions)?

• Infection & environment: Although the glue is designed for wet environments, how does it perform in contaminated/infected fractures or open fractures. 

6. Implications for the UK / Europe

From a UK/European perspective (relevant to you in Sittingbourne, England):

• This technology could eventually reduce hospital stays for fracture repair, lower resource use (less theatre time, less hardware logistics).

• The UK’s NHS and European health systems often adopt proven international innovations – but widespread adoption will await regulatory approval (e.g., MHRA in UK), cost-effectiveness studies, and surgeon training.

• Patients might benefit from faster recovery, fewer operations, and less implant-related hardware removal – this could improve outcomes and quality of life.

• As with any new technology, surgeon awareness, infrastructure, and evidence will determine when it becomes available locally.

7. Conclusion

The development of Bone-02, the oyster-inspired, injectable bone-glue from China, represents a potential game-changer in fracture management. Its ability to bond bone fragments within minutes, in a minimally invasive way, and be absorbed by the body offers an exciting alternative to traditional metal plates and screws.

However, while early results are promising, the technology is not yet a fully established standard worldwide. Further clinical trials, long-term data, and regulatory approvals will determine how quickly it becomes mainstream.

Attached is a news article regarding glue that repairs a broken bone in 3 minutes made in china 

https://nypost.com/2025/09/28/health/china-made-bone-02-glue-fixes-fractures-in-just-three-minutes-with-one-injection/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Miley Cyrus Sparks Buzz After Debuting Striking New Look

Pop icon Miley Cyrus has once again set social media alight — this time for her dramatically different new appearance. Fans were left stunned after the singer was spotted looking almost unrecognisable from her usual style, prompting speculation and admiration in equal measure.

The “Flowers” hitmaker, known for her ever-evolving image and fearless fashion statements, appeared at a recent event sporting darker hair, a softer makeup look, and a minimalist outfit that marked a sharp contrast from her typically bold and edgy persona. Many fans took to social media to comment on how “elegant,” “grown-up,” and “completely different” she looked.

“Miley looks amazing — she’s glowing!” one fan wrote on X (formerly Twitter), while another added, “I had to do a double take. This is such a different vibe, and I love it.”

Over the years, Cyrus has built a reputation for reinvention — from her Disney Channel days as Hannah Montana, through her rebellious Bangerz era, to her current evolution as a mature and reflective artist. Her latest look seems to signal yet another new chapter in her career and personal journey.

Sources close to the star suggest that Miley’s transformation may align with new music on the horizon. “She’s been working on a more soulful, stripped-back sound,” one insider hinted, “and her appearance reflects that creative shift.”

Whether this is a temporary style change or a full rebranding, one thing is certain — Miley Cyrus continues to prove that she’s a master of transformation, unafraid to surprise her audience and redefine herself on her own terms.

Attached is a news article regarding milly Cyrus not looking her self 

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/miley-cyrus-practically-unrecognizable-bold-140137127.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Sleeping Late Could Shorten Your Life, New Research Warns

A growing body of research suggests that being a “night owl” — someone who regularly stays up late and sleeps in — could increase the risk of dying earlier than those who rise and rest with the sun. Scientists say that the habit of going to bed late disrupts the body’s natural rhythm, leading to serious long-term health consequences.

According to a study published in the Chronobiology International Journal, people who consistently sleep late are up to 10% more likely to die prematurely compared to early risers. The findings are based on data collected over several years, examining sleep patterns, health conditions, and mortality rates among thousands of adults.

Experts believe the reason lies in the body’s internal “clock,” or circadian rhythm, which governs the sleep-wake cycle. When individuals go against this natural rhythm — staying awake at night and sleeping late into the morning — it can lead to chronic sleep deprivation, hormone imbalances, and elevated stress levels. Over time, this disruption increases the risk of heart disease, diabetes, depression, and stroke.

Dr. Karen O’Reilly, a sleep researcher at the University of Oxford, explains:

“Our bodies are programmed to follow light and darkness. When we ignore those signals by staying up until 2 or 3 a.m., we throw off critical biological functions — everything from blood sugar regulation to brain activity.”

Lifestyle factors also play a role. Night owls are more likely to engage in unhealthy late-night habits such as snacking, drinking alcohol, or excessive screen time — all of which can compound health risks.

However, experts say change is possible. Gradually adjusting bedtime by 15 to 30 minutes earlier each night, limiting caffeine intake after midday, and avoiding bright screens before bed can help reset the body’s internal clock. Exposure to natural sunlight in the morning is also a simple yet powerful way to encourage healthier sleep timing.

While some may naturally prefer the quiet of late nights, researchers warn that ignoring your body’s natural cues could come with a heavy price. As Dr. O’Reilly adds,

“Sleep is not just about rest — it’s one of the most important predictors of long-term health. How and when you sleep can literally determine how long you live.”

Attached is a news article regarding people who sleep late are at risk of dying early 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-43711631.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Big Headlines — and What They Actually Mean

Media outlets across the world ran attention-grabbing stories with headlines like: “Ireland will pay you $90,000 to start fresh on a quiet island.” In reality, the situation is more nuanced. The scheme behind those headlines is genuine — but it isn’t a free relocation payment.  

What is the scheme

Our Living Islands is a policy introduced in 2023 by Ireland’s Department of Rural and Community Development aimed at revitalising the remote, offshore islands of Ireland that have experienced population decline.  

As part of that, there is a refurbishment grant scheme which offers up to €84,000 (≈ US $90,000) for eligible vacant or derelict properties on certain islands.  

What the grant is, and what it is not

• It is: A government grant intended only for the refurbishment of a vacant or derelict home on one of the qualifying islands.  

• It is not: A payment simply for moving to the island, buying property, or using it as a holiday home.  

• The property must be used as the applicant’s main residence, not a holiday let.  

• Applicants must already have the right to live in Ireland, meaning it’s not a ready-made visa/immigration route.  

Who is eligible

• The property must be located on one of the designated offshore islands (those with no bridge/land link to the mainland).  

• It must have been vacant for at least two years and built before a certain date (often pre-1993) to qualify as “derelict” for the larger grant.  

• Grant amounts differ based on condition: up to around €50,000 for a typical vacant home; up to €84,000 for a derelict one requiring major works.  

Why Ireland Is Doing This

Many of Ireland’s offshore islands have suffered from population decline, especially among younger residents, as jobs, transport, and services have become more challenging. The policy aims to:

• Sustain vibrant island communities by encouraging people to live permanently rather than holiday-ing.

• Put vacant/derelict properties back into use instead of them becoming derelict ruins.

• Support broader infrastructure and service improvements on those islands (housing, broadband, transport) as part of the 10-year plan.  

In short: it’s not just about giving people a dreamy island life, it’s about reviving and sustaining small communities that face risk of disappearing.

The Reality — What to Consider

If you’re thinking: “Great – a beautiful Irish island, ocean views, quiet life, €84k grant!” — here are some practical realities:

The positives

• You could get substantial support to refurbish an old home (if you meet the criteria).

• The setting: remote, scenic, peaceful — a very different pace of life.

• For someone working remotely or running a location-independent business, this could be a genuine lifestyle change.

• Being part of a smaller, community-oriented place can be rewarding in ways big city life isn’t.

 The trade-offs & challenges

• The grant only covers refurbishment: you still need to buy or own the property, pump in the funds for works, manage logistics.  

• On remote islands: logistics, transport, weather and service access (shops, healthcare, schools) can be far more challenging than mainland life.  

• Just because a headline says “£70,000” or “$90,000” doesn’t mean that covers everything or that life is easy. People on those islands talk of ferry costs, higher supplier costs, isolation, weather disruptions.  

• You must commit to using the home as your primary residence, so this is more a lifestyle decision, not a speculative investment or holiday home.  

• The number of applicants so far has been relatively small — indicating that the scheme, while headline-grabbing, may be less straightforward than it sounds.  

So — Is It “Free Money to Move to a Quiet Island”

No — not exactly. The headline “Ireland will pay you 90k to move to a quiet island” is misleading, though rooted in a real government scheme. The nuance is:

• The money is for refurbishing homes, not for relocation only.

• You must meet many eligibility criteria (ownership or buying the property; rights to reside; main residence; property condition).

• It’s a long-term commitment to live on the island, not just a vacation.

• It’s about reviving communities — the government is not paying people simply to move.  

Final Thoughts

If you’re drawn to the idea of island life off Ireland’s wild coastline — dramatic cliffs, sea-spray, a strong sense of community — this scheme could represent an exciting opportunity. But treat it as a serious lifestyle & property project, not a casual relocation with a cheque attached.

You’ll need:

• The legal right to live in Ireland.

• The financial means to purchase (if buying) and refurbish a property.

• A willingness to embrace the challenges of remote living (transport, weather, services).

• The mindset of being part of a small community, rather than simply finding a holiday home.

Attached is a news article regarding Ireland paying people to move to a island for 90k 

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/ireland-92000-to-move-to-remote-islands-heres-how-it-works/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

In-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc

894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36

https://www.legalentityidentifier.co.uk/leicert/894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36/

https://www.zoominfo.com/c/smileband/541441561